In the FM region, experimental results for the critical exponent β ¼0.171 and 0.262 for x¼0.09 and 0.12, respectively reveal twofirst samples exhibiting tricriticality associated with the
Trang 1Critical behavior of La 0.7 Ca 0.3 Mn 1 x Ni x O 3 manganites exhibiting the
The-Long Phana,b,1, Q.T Tranb,e, P.Q Thanhb,c, P.D.H Yenb,d, T.D Thanhb,e, S.C Yua,b
Q1
a
Department
Q2 of Physics, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 361-763, South Korea
b Center for Science
Q3 and Technology Communication, Ministry of Science and Technology, 113 Tran Duy Hung, Hanoi, Vietnam
c
Faculty of Physics, Hanoi University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam
d
Faculty of Engineering Physics and Nanotechnology, VNU – University of Engineering and Technology, Xuan Thuy, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam
e
Institute of Materials Science, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 29 October 2013
Received in revised form
28 December 2013
Accepted 29 December 2013
by F Peeters
Keywords:
A Perovskite manganites
D Critical behavior
D Magnetic entropy change
a b s t r a c t
We used Banerjee0s criteria, modified Arrott plots, and the scaling hypothesis to analyze magnetic-field dependences of magnetization near the ferromagnetic–paramagnetic (FM–PM) phase-transition tem-perature (TC) of perovskite-type manganites La0.7Ca0.3Mn1xNixO3(x¼0.09, 0.12 and 0.15) In the FM region, experimental results for the critical exponent β (¼0.171 and 0.262 for x¼0.09 and 0.12, respectively) reveal twofirst samples exhibiting tricriticality associated with the crossover of first- and second-order phase transitions Increasing Ni-doping content leads to the shift of theβvalue (¼0.320 for
x¼0.15) towards that expected for the 3D Ising model (β¼0.325) This is due to the fact that the substitution of Ni ions into the Mn site changes structural parameters and dilutes the FM phase, which act asfluctuations and influence the FM-interaction strength of double-exchange Mn3þ–Mn4þpairs, and the phase-transition type For the critical exponent γ (¼0.976–0.990), the stability in its value demonstrates the PM behavior above TCof the samples Particularly, around TCof La0.7Ca0.3Mn1xNixO3 compounds, magnetic-field dependences of the maximum magnetic-entropy change can be described by
a power law of |ΔSmax|pHn, where values n¼0.55–0.77 are quite far from those (n¼0.33–0.48) calculated from the theoretical relation n¼1þ(β1)/(βþγ) This difference is related to the use of the mean-field theory for the samples exhibiting the magnetic inhomogeneity
& 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd
1 Introduction
It is known that hole-doped lanthanum manganites of
La1x(Ca, Sr, Ba)xMnO3 with x¼0.3 (corresponding to Mn3 þ/
Mn4þ¼7/3) usually exhibit colossal magnetoresistance (MR) and
magnetocaloric (MC) effects around their the ferromagnetic–
paramagnetic (FM–PM) phase-transition temperature (the Curie
temperature, TC)[1] With this doping content, double-exchange
(DE) FM interactions between Mn3 þ and Mn4 þ are dominant as
comparing with super-exchange anti-FM interactions of Mn3 þ–
Mn3þ and Mn4þ–Mn4 þ pairs The strength of magnetic
interac-tions thus depends on the average bond length〈Mn–O〉, and bond
angle 〈Mn–O–Mn〉 of the perosvkite structure Different
com-pounds have different bond parameters, which are related to
Jahn–Teller lattice distortions due to strong electron–phonon
coupling[2] In reference to the symmetry of MnO6octahedra, it
has been noted that cooperative Jahn–Teller distortions are
present in an orthorhombic structure rather than in the rhombo-hedral one[3]
Among hole-doped manganites, orthorhombic La0.7Ca0.3MnO3
is known as a typical material exhibiting MR and MC effects much greater than those obtained from the other compounds Particu-larly, depending on bulk or nanostructured sample types, its TCin the range of 222–265 K [3–9] can be tuned towards room temperature by doping Sr, Ba or Pb [10–14] Meanwhile, the transition-metal doping (such as Co, Fe, Ni and so forth) lowers
TC[15–17] Additionally, its discontinuous FM–PM transition at TC
is followed up with structural changes, and is known as a first-order magnetic phase transition (FOMT)[8,9,12] This discontin-uous phase transition can be rounded to a contindiscontin-uous one of a second-order magnetic phase transition (SOMT) upon the doping, and reduced dimensionality (i.e.,finite-size effects), and external fields[5,7,11,12,16,18,19] The assessment of a continuous SOMT can base on the success in determining the critical exponentsβ,γ, and δ associated with temperature dependences of the sponta-neous magnetization, Ms(T), inverse initial susceptibility, χ0 –1(T), and critical isotherm at TC, respectively[20,21] Distinguishing the FOMT from the SOMT can be based on the criteria proposed by
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93
Contents lists available atScienceDirect
journal homepage:www.elsevier.com/locate/ssc
Solid State Communications
0038-1098/$ - see front matter & 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2013.12.032
E-mail address: ptlong2512@yahoo.com (T.-L Phan).
1 Tel.: þ82 43 261 2269.
Please cite this article as: T.-L Phan, et al., Solid State Commun (2014),http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2013.12.032i
Trang 2thefield, and M is the magnetization) in the vicinity of TC, and then
suggested that their positive or negative slopes are indication of a
second- or first-order phase transition, respectively Reviewing
previous
studies, one can see that many works focused on La0.7Ca0.3
-MnO3-based materials showing the FOMT and/or SOMT However,
the crossover region from first-order to second-order phase
transitions, and some related physical properties, such as the
magnetic entropy change versus T and H, ΔSm(T, H), have not
been widely studied Furthermore, there is no much attention
given to the assessment of a magnetic ordering parameter (n)
determined from the relations n¼1þ(β1)/(βþγ)[23], and from
a power law|ΔSmax(H)|pHn[24](where|ΔSmax| is the maximum
magnetic entropy change around TC) To get more insight into the
above problems, we prepared La0.7Ca0.3Mn1 xNixO3compounds,
and have studied their critical behaviors upon Banerjee0s criteria
[22], modified Arrott plots and the scaling hypothesis[20,21] The
determined critical values are then discussed together with the
magnetic ordering parameter n
2 Experimental details
Three polycrystalline perovskite-type manganites La0.7Ca0.3
Mn1xNixO3with x¼0.09, 0.12 and 0.15 were prepared by
solid-state reaction as using purity commercial powders La2O3, CaO,
NiO, and MnCO3(99.9%) as precursors These powders combined
with stoichiometrical quantities were well mixed and ground, and
then pre-annealed at 9001C for 24 h After pre-annealing, three
mixtures were re-ground and pressed into pellets, and annealed at
13001C for 72 h in air For reference, the parent compound
La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 was also prepared with the same conditions as
described X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of thefinal products
checked by an X-ray diffractometer (Bruker AXS, D8 Discover)
revealed the single phase in an orthorhombic structure (the space
group Pbnm) of La0.7Ca0.3Mn1xNixO3samples, seeFig 1(a) Basing
on the XRD data, we calculated the lattice parameters (a, b, and c)
and unit cell (V), as shown in Table 1 The variation of these
parameters indicates the substitution of Ni ions (could be
Ni2þ, Ni3þ, and/or Ni4þ) for Mn in the perovskite structure
Magnetic measurements were performed on a superconducting
quantum interference device magnetometer (SQUID) The TC
values obtained from the flexion points in temperature
depen-dences of magnetization, M(T), with the appliedfield H¼100 Oe,
Fig 1(b) are about 200, 185 and 170 K for x¼0.09, 0.12 and 0.15,
respectively, which are lower than the value TCE260 K of the
parent compound
3 Results and discussion
Fig 2shows M–H data and inverse Arrott plots (H/M versus M2)
at different temperatures around the FM–PM phase transition of
La0.7Ca0.3Mn1xNixO3 It appears from the M–H data that there is
no saturation magnetization value in spite of the H variation up to
40 kOe This is assigned to the existence of the magnetic
inhomo-geneity or short-range FM order At a given temperature, higher
Ni-doping content reduces the magnetization With increasing
temperature, nonlinear M–H curves in the FM region become
linear because the samples enter the PM state Different from the
parent compound[5,7–9,12], there is no S-like shape in the M–H
curves, and negative slopes in the H/M versus M2curves, seeFig 2
These tokens demonstrate our Ni-doped samples undergoing the
FOMT[22,25]
According to the mean-field theory (MFT) proposed for a ferro-magnet exhibiting the SOMT and long-range FM interactions[26], the free energy GLis expanded in even powers of M: GL¼aM2þ
bM4þ⋯ – HM, where a and b are temperature-dependent para-meters Minimizing GLas∂GL/∂M¼0 results in the relation H/M¼ 2aþ4bM2 It means that if magnetic interactions of the FM system exactly obey the MFT, M2versus H/M curves in the vicinity of TC
are parallel straight lines At TC, the M2 and H/M line passes through the origin [27,28] However, these features are absent from the Arrott performance shown inFig 2(b, d, and e) It means that magnetic interactions in the samples could not be the long-range type The critical exponentsβ¼0.5 andγ¼1.0 (in the normal Arrott plots[20,27]) based on the MFT are thus not suitable to describe magnetic interactions taking place in our samples Within the framework of the MFT, we need to find other sets of the critical-exponent values reflecting more frankly the magnetic properties of the samples This work is based on the modified Arrott plot (MAP) method [20], which is generalized by the scaling equation of state, (H/M)1/ γ¼c1εþc2M1/ β, where c
1and c2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0.0
0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2
x = 0.15
x = 0.12
x = 0.09
x = 0
T (K)
x = 0 x = 0.09
x = 0.12 x = 0.15
H = 100 Oe
Fig 1 (Color online) (a) Room-temperature XRD patterns, and (b) normalized M(T) curves with the applied field of H¼100 Oe for La 0.7 Ca 0.3 Mn 1x Ni x O 3 (x ¼0, 0.09, 0.12, and 0.15).
Table 1 Values of the lattice parameters and unit cell calculated from XRD analyses of
La 0.7 Ca 0.3 Mn 1x Ni x O 3 with x¼0.09, 0.12 and 0.15.
)
Please cite this article as: T.-L Phan, et al., Solid State Commun (2014),http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2013.12.032i
Trang 3are temperature-dependent parameters, andε¼(TTC)/TCis the
reduced temperature βand γ values can be obtained from the
asymptotic relations[18,20]
where M0, h0, and D are the critical amplitudes Additionally,
according to the static-scaling hypothesis[21], M is a function ofε
and H, MðH;εÞ ¼ jεjβf7ðH=jεjβþγÞ This equation reflects that, with
determinedβandγvalues, plotting M/εβversus H/εβ þ γmakes all
data points falling on the fand fþbranches for ToTCand T4TC,
respectively Here, determining the critical parameters is based on
the MAP method, and started from the scaling equation of state
Correctβandγ values make M–H data points falling on a set of
parallel straight lines in the performance of M1/ βversus (H/M)1/ γ.
Moreover, the M1/ βversus (H/M)1/ γline passes through the origin
at TC Similar to the MFT case, our analyses indicated that the
exponent values β¼0.365 and γ¼1.336 expected for the 3D
Heisenberg model [21] do not match with the descriptions of
the MAP method Only β¼0.25 and γ¼1.0 expected for the
tricritical MFT model (T-MFT), andβ¼0.325 andγ¼1.241 expected
for the 3D Ising model[12,29]can be used as initially trial values
tofind optimal exponent values for the samples with x¼0.09 and 0.12, and for x¼0.15, respectively With these trial values, Ms(T) andχ0(T) data would be obtained from the linear extrapolation in the high-field region for the isotherms to the co-ordinate axes of
M1/ βand (1/χ0)1/ γ¼(H/M)1/ γ, respectively The M
s(T) andχ0(T) data obtained from the linear extrapolation are thenfitted to Eqs.(1) and (2), respectively, to achieve betterβ,γand TCvalues, as can be seen fromFig 3 These new values ofβ,γ, and TCare continuously used for next MAP processes until their optimal values are achieved Notably, the TC values of the samples obtained from
M–T measurements were also used as reference in the fitting With such the careful comparison, only the sets of critical parameters with TCE199.4 K, β¼0.17170.006 and γ¼0.97670.012 for x¼ 0.09; TCE184.4 K, β¼0.26270.005 and γ¼0.97970.012 for
x¼0.12; and TCE170 K, β¼0.32070.009 and γ¼0.99070.082 for x¼0.15 are in good agreement with the MAP descriptions, see
Fig 4 With the obtained critical exponents, the scaling perfor-mance of M/|ε|βversus H/εβ þ γcurves, seeFig 5and their inset, reveals the M–H data points at high-magnetic fields falling into two f and fþ universal branches for ToTCand T4TC, respec-tively These results prove the reliability in value of the critical values obtained from our work It should be noticed that the MAP method only works well for thefields (HL) higher than 28, 24 and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132
0 20 40 60 80
2 4 6 8
0 20 40 60
2 4 6 8
0 20 40 60 80
2 4 6 8
206 K
168 K
206 K
168 K
220 K
182 K
220 K
182 K
2, Oe.g/emu)
190 K
152 K
H (kOe)
190 K
152 K
Fig 2 (Color online) M–H data and inverse Arrott plots for La 0.7 Ca 0.3 Mn 1x Ni x O 3 with (a, b) x¼0.09, (c, d) x¼0.12, and (e, f) x¼0.15.
Please cite this article as: T.-L Phan, et al., Solid State Commun (2014),http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2013.12.032i
Trang 412 kOe for x¼0.09, 0.12 and 0.15, respectively At the fields lower
than HL, there may be rearrangement of magnetic domains, the
effect due to the uncertainty in the calculation of demagnetization
factor, and/or the persistence of the FOMT (particularly for the
samples with x¼0.09 and 0.12) [12,30] Unexpected errors for
critical values can thus be occurred, leading to the scattering of the
M–H data points (at the fields lower than HL) from the universal
curves[5,12], as can be seen inFig 5 For the exponentδ, its value
can be obtained from fitting the isotherms at T¼TC to Eq (3)
Basically, theδvalues determined from Eq.(3)would be equal to
those calculated from the Widom relation δ¼1þγ/β [21] In
our work, δ values are about 6.7, 4.7, and 4.1 for x¼0.09, 0.12
and 0.15, respectively Clearly, with increasing Ni concentration in
La0.7Ca0.3Mn1 xNixO3, there is a shifting tendency of the exponent values (β,γandδ) towards those of the MFT (withβ¼0.5,γ¼1 and
δ¼3) This is tightly related to the FOMT–SOMT transformation The better applicability of the MAP method has been found for the samples with high-enough Ni concentrations as x40.12 We believe that the substitution of Ni ions into the Mn site not only changes structural parameters of 〈Mn–O〉 and 〈Mn–O–Mn〉, but also leads to the additional presence of anti-FM interactions related to Ni ions (for example, super-exchange pairs of Ni2 þ
–Ni2 þ, Ni3 þ–Ni3 þ, Ni4 þ–Ni4 þ, and/or Ni2þ ,3 þ ,4 þ–Mn3 þ ,4 þ) beside pre-existing anti-FM interaction pairs of Mn3 þ–Mn3þ and
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132
56 64 72
200 205 210 215
0 2 4
170 175 180 185 30
40 50 60
190 195 200 0
2 4
155 160 165 170 30
40 50
175 180 1850
1 2 3
T (K)
Ms
χ0
2, Oe.g/emu)
β = 0.171 ± 0.006
γ = 0.976 ± 0.012
β = 0.262 ± 0.005
γ = 0.979 ± 0.012
β = 0.320 ± 0.009
γ = 0.990 ± 0.082
Fig 3 (Color online) M s (T) and χ 1
0 ðTÞ data fitted to Eqs (1 ) and ( 2 ) for La 0.7 Ca 0.3 Mn 1x Ni x O 3 with (a) x¼0.09, (b) x¼0.12, and (c) x¼0.15.
0 10 20 30
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6
0 4 8
214 K
186 K
β (x10
6, emu/g)
200 K
174 K
180 K
152 K
x104
x = 0.09
x = 0.15
β = 0.320
γ = 0.990
β = 0.262
γ = 0.978
β = 0.171
γ = 0.976
Fig 4 (Color online) MAPs of M 1/β versus (H/M) 1/γ with the critical exponents obtained for La 0.7 Ca 0.3 Mn 1x Ni x O 3 with (a) x¼0.09, (b) x¼0.12 and (c) x¼0.15.
Please cite this article as: T.-L Phan, et al., Solid State Commun (2014),http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2013.12.032i
Trang 5Mn4þ–Mn4 þ These factors act asfluctuations, reduce the strength
of Mn3þ–Mn4 þ FM interactions (which thus reduce the
magne-tization and TCvalues), and influence the phase transition as well
Comparing with the theoretical models [21,29], one can see
that the values ofγ(¼0.976–0.990) are quite stable,
demonstrat-ing the complete PM state in the samples at temperatures above
TC For the FM region, however,β¼0.262 for x¼0.12 is close to that
expected for the T-MFT (β¼0.25) This sample thus exhibits
tricriticality associated with the crossover offirst- and
second-order phase transitions Similar results were also found in some
manganites [9,12,29] A smaller value of β¼0.171 for x¼0.09
reveals this sample lying in the region close to the crossover,
where the FOMT is still persistent It is also known that the
MAP application for the materials with the presence of the FOMT
makes of their exponent values different from those expected for
the theoretical models, such as the cases of La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 and
La0.9Te0.1MnO3[5,31] With a higher Ni-doping content of x¼0.15,
one can see that itsβvalue (¼0.320) is close to that expected for
the 3D Ising model (β¼0.325), indicating the existence of
short-range FM order associated with the magnetic inhomogeneity, and
FM/anti-FM mixed phase It comes to our attention that the β
value tends to shift towards the values of the Heisenberg model
and MFT if Ni content (x) in La0.7Ca0.3Mn1xNixO3is higher than
0.15 For inhomogeneous ferromagnets, the critical values usually
depend on the magneticfield ranges employed for MAP analyses
because of a significant field-induced change in the nature and
range of the FM interaction[9,32] Performing a renormalization
group analysis of exchange-interaction systems, Fisher et al found
the exponent values depending on the range of exchange
interac-tion characterized by J(r)¼1/rd þ s(where d, andsare the
dimen-sion of the system, and the interaction range, respectively)[33]
The MFT exponents are valid for so1/2 while the Heisenberg
ones are valid fors42 The exponents belong to other
univers-ality classes (such as the T-MFT and 3D Ising models) if 1/2oso2,
which can be the case taking place in our samples
Together with assessing the critical behaviors of La0.7Ca0.3Mn1x
-NixO3 samples, we have also considered the magnetic-entropy
change (ΔSm) and its field dependence, as shown in Fig 6 At a
given temperature for each sample,ΔSmincreases with increasing
H Around TC, ΔSm(T) curves reach the maxima, |ΔSmax| The
|ΔSmax| values determined for x¼0.09, 0.12, and 0.15 in the field
H¼40 kOe are about 7.1, 5.2, and 3.4 J kg1K1, respectively, which are smaller than those obtained from the parent compound [7] Though the Ni doping reduces the|ΔSmax| value, the linewidth of the
ΔSm(T) curves become broadened due to the FOMT–SOMT trans-formation, enhancing the refrigerant capacity (RC) Particularly, at TC the H dependences of|ΔSmax| can be well described by a power law
of|ΔSmax|pHn[24], where values n¼0.55, 0.68, and 0.77 for x¼0.09, 0.12, and 0.15, respectively These values are different from those (n¼0.33, 0.41, and 0.48 for x¼0.09, 0.12, and 0.15, respectively) calculated from the relation n¼1þ(β1)/(βþγ)[23] As shown in Ref.[34], n is known as a function of T, H and|ΔSm|, which can also be obtained from the relation n¼d ln|ΔSm|/d ln H Depending on the variation of these parameters, n would be different It reaches the minimum at temperatures in the vicinity of TC[23] We believe that a large deviation of the n values obtained from two routes is because the exponent valuesβandγdetermined from the MAP method are much different from those expected for the MFT In other words,
La0.7Ca0.3Mn1xNixO3 samples are not conventional ferromagnets There are the magnetic inhomogeneity, and the existence of FOMT and/or SOMT properties (particularly for two samples with x¼0.09 and 0.12 lying in the crossover region) For conventional ferro-magnets obeyed the MFT, n is equal to 2/3 However, experimental results based on the framework of the SOMT (MFT) theory for inhomogeneous ferromagnets, like the present cases, introduce the values n different from 2/3[23,24]
4 Conclusions
We studied the critical behavior and related physical properties
of manganites La0.7Ca0.3Mn1xNixO3 (x¼0.09, 0.12 and 0.15) around their TCvalues Detailed analyses of the M–H–T data based
on the MAP method revealed the stability in value of γE1, demonstrating the real PM behavior above TC in the samples However, in the FM region, experimental results revealed the
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132
β (emu/g)
Fig 5 (Color online) Scaling performance of M/|ε| β versus H/|ε| β þ γ in the log scale at temperatures ToT C and T4T C for La 0.7 Ca 0.3 Mn 1x Ni x O 3 with (a) x¼0.09, (b) x¼0.12 and (c) x¼0.15 The insets plot the same data in the linear scale.
Please cite this article as: T.-L Phan, et al., Solid State Commun (2014),http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2013.12.032i
Trang 6sample x¼0.15 undergoing the SOMT Its βexponent is close to
that expected for the 3D Ising model For the samples with lower
Ni-doping contents, their exponents β (¼0.171 and 0.262 for
x¼0.09 and 0.12, respectively) indicate the samples exhibiting
tricriticality associated with the FOMT–SOMT transformation; in
which, the FOMT is dominant at thefields lower than HL
Short-range FM interactions are thus found in all the samples
Interest-ingly, around TC,field dependences of |ΔSmax| can be described by
a power law |ΔSmax|pHn The n values (¼0.55–0.77) obtained
from the power-lawfitting are higher than those (n¼0.33–0.48)
calculated from the relation n¼1þ(β1)/(βþγ) We believe that
the deviation of the n values obtained from two ways is related to
the using of the approximate MFT (the MAP method) for
uncon-ventional ferromagnets (with the existence of the magnetic
inhomogeneity, and FOMT and/or SOMT properties), where the
exponent values β and γ determined are much different from
those expected for the MFT
Acknowledgment
This research was supported by the Converging Research
Center Program through the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future
Planning, Korea (2013K000405)
References [1] A.P Ramirez, J Phys.: Condens Matter 9 (1997) 8171.
[2] A.J Millis, B.I Shraiman, R Mueller, Phys Rev Lett 77 (1996) 175.
[3] J Mira, J Rivas, L.E Hueso, F Rivadulla, M.A Lopez Quintela, J Appl Phys 91 (2002) 8903.
[4] A Berger, G Campillo, P Vivas, J.E Pearson, S.D Bader, E Baca, P Prieto,
J Appl Phys 91 (2002) 8393.
[5] H.S Shin, J.E Lee, Y.S Nam, H.L Ju, C.W Park, Solid State Commun 118 (2001) 377.
[6] S Taran, B.K Chaudhuri, S Chatterjee, H.D Yang, S Neeleshwar, Y.Y Chen,
J Appl Phys 98 (2005) 103903.
[7] P Lampen, N.S Bingham, M.H Phan, H Kim, M Osofsky, A Pique, T.L Phan, S.C Yu, H Srikanth, Appl Phys Lett 102 (2013) 062414.
[8] J Mira, J Rivsa, F Rivadulla, C.V Vazquez, M.A.L Quintela, Phys Rev B 60 (1999) 2998.
[9] P Zhang, P Lampen, T.L Phan, S.C Yu, T.D Thanh, N.H Dan, V.D Lam,
H Srikanth, M.H Phan, J Magn Magn Mater 348 (2013) 146.
[10] D.T Hanh, M.S Islam, F.A Khan, D.L Minh, N Chau, J Magn Magn Mater 310 (2007) 2826.
[11] N Moutis, I Panagiotopoulos, M Pissas, D Niarchos, Phys Rev B 59 (1999) 1129 [12] M.H Phan, V Franco, N.S Bingham, H Srikanth, N.H Hur, S.C Yu, J Alloys Compd 508 (2010) 238.
[13] M.H Phan, S.B Tian, S.C Yu, A.N Ulyanov, J Magn Magn Mater 256 (2003) 306.
[14] T.D Thanh, L.H Nguyen, D.H Manh, N.V Chien, P.T Phong, N.V Khiem, L.V Hong, N.X Phuc, Physica B 407 (2012) 145.
[15] S.H Hua, P.Y Zhang, H.F Yang, S.Y Zhang, H.L Ge, J Magn 18 (2013) 34.
[16] P.J Lampen, Y.D Zhang, T.L Phan, P Zhang, S.C Yu, H Srikanth, M.H Phan,
J Appl Phys 112 (2012) 113901.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132
0 2 4 6 8
0 2 4 6
1 2 3 4
0 2 4 6 8
0 2 4 6
0 1 2 3
40 kOe
30 kOe
20 kOe
10 kOe
40 kOe
30 kOe
20 kOe
Sm
-1.K
-1)
10 kOe
40 kOe
30 kOe
20 kOe
10 kOe
T (K)
|ΔSmax| α Hn
|ΔSmax| α Hn
(with n = 0.77) (with n = 0.68) (with n = 0.55)
Smax
-1K
-1)
H (kO e) Fig 6 (Color online) ΔS m (T) curves with the fields H¼10, 20, 30 and 40 kOe, and field dependences of |ΔS max | at T C fitted to a power law |ΔS max |pH n
for
La 0.7 Ca 0.3 Mn1xNi x O 3 with (a, b) x ¼0.09, (c, d) x¼0.12 and (e, f) x¼0.15.
Please cite this article as: T.-L Phan, et al., Solid State Commun (2014),http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2013.12.032i
Trang 7[17] Y.D Zhang, T.L Phan, S.C Yu, J Appl Phys 111 (2012) 07D703.
[18] S Rößler, U.K Rößler, K Nenkov, D Eckert, S.M Yusuf, K Dörr, K.-H Müller,
Phys Rev B 70 (2004) 104417.
[19] L.E Hueso, P Sande, D.R Miguéns, J Rivas, F Rivadulla, M.A López-Quintela,
J Appl Phys 91 (2002) 9943.
[20] A Arrott, J.E Noakes, Phys Rev Lett 19 (1967) 786.
[21] H.E Stanley, Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Oxford
University Press, London, 1971.
[22] S.K Banerjee, Phys Lett 12 (1964) 16.
[23] V Franco, J.S Blázquez, A Conde, Appl Phys Lett 89 (2006) 222512.
[24] H Oesterreicher, F.T Parker, J Appl Phys 55 (1984) 4336.
[25] J Mira, J Rivas, M Vazquez, J.M.G Beneytez, J Arcas, R.D Sanchez, M.A.
S Rodriguez, Phys Rev B 59 (1999) 123.
[26] J.M.D Coey, Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Cambridge University Press, Q4 2010.
[27] A Arrott, Phys Rev 108 (1957) 1394.
[28] S Mukherjee, P Raychaudhuri, A.K Nigam, Phys Rev B 61 (2000) 8651.
[29] D Kim, B Revaz, B.L Zink, F Hellman, J.J Rhyne, J.F Mitchell, Phys Rev Lett 89 (2002) 227202.
[30] N Khan, P Mandal, K Mydeen, D Prabhakaran, Phys Rev B 85 (2012) 214419 [31] J Yang, Y.P Lee, Y Li, Phys Rev B 76 (2007) 054442.
[32] T.L Phan, Y.D Zhang, P Zhang, T.D Thanh, S.C Yu, J Appl Phys 112 (2012) 093906.
[33] M.E Fisher, S.K Ma, B.G Nickel, Phys Rev Lett 29 (1972) 917.
[34] A Biswas, T.L Phan, N.H Dan, P Zhang, S.C Yu, H Srikanth, M.H Phan, Appl Phys Lett 103 (2013) 162410.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Please cite this article as: T.-L Phan, et al., Solid State Commun (2014),http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2013.12.032i