9 2011 490-493 Conference IWAMN2009 -Degradation of Phenol Using the Mixed Al-Fe Pillared Bentonite as a Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton Catalyst∗ Nguyen Thi Dieu Cam† Faculty of Chemistry,
Trang 1e-Journal of Surface Science and Nanotechnology 27 December 2011
e-J Surf Sci Nanotech Vol 9 (2011) 490-493 Conference IWAMN2009
-Degradation of Phenol Using the Mixed (Al-Fe) Pillared Bentonite as a
Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton Catalyst∗
Nguyen Thi Dieu Cam†
Faculty of Chemistry, Quy Nhon University, 170 An Duong Vuong, Quy Nhon, Binh Dinh, Vietnam
Dao Thanh Phuong, Ha Van Tai, Nguyen Dinh Bang, and Nguyen Van Noi
Faculty of Chemistry, Hanoi University of Science VNU-Hanoi,
334 Nguyen Trai, Thanh Xuan, Hanoi, Vietnam
(Received 16 December 2009; Accepted 21 June 2010; Published 27 December 2011)
In this work the mixed Al-Fe pillared bentonite was developed and tested as a heterogeneous catalyst for the photo-Fenton oxidation of phenol under solar light irradiation The structural characteristics of the catalyst were examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) The Al-Fe pillared clay exhibits higher basal distance than original bentonite The effect of pH to the degradation of phenol and the reusability of the catalyst were addressed.The results of photocatalytic experiments indicate that the heterogeneous photo-Fenton process employing the Al-Fe pillared clay as a photocatalyst possesses a high potential for phenol degradation During the photocatalytic reaction, the amount of iron leaching out increases as a function of time Significantly lower concentration of Fe2+and Fe3+in the solution after the treatment could give a great advantage to the mixed Al-Fe pillared bentonite/H2O2system over the homogeneous Fenton system [DOI: 10.1380/ejssnt.2011.490]
Keywords: Pillared clay; Heterogeneous Fenton; Phenol; Catalytic activity, Solar light irradiation
In Fenton reaction, hydroxyl radical - a strong oxidant
[1–4] - is produced OH• can oxidize non-biodegradable
pollutants into CO2 and H2O
Fe2++ H2O2→ Fe3++ OH−+ HO• (1)
Fe3++ H2O2 → Fe(OOH)2++ H+
→ Fe2++ HO•
Fe3++ HO•
Fe(OH)2++ hv → Fe2++ HO• (4)
However, homogeneous Fenton reaction requires high
con-centration of Fe (II), and iron ions must be treated after
used In addition, low pH condition of this reaction makes
it impractical because of the high cost of acidifying before
treatment and neutralizing after treatment Therefore,
immobilizing transition metal ions to improve efficient of
Fenton process is the objective of this project
In order to decrease the price and increase the
availabil-ity of catalysts, clay is one of the most promising carriers
to immobilize metal ions Pillared interlayered process
is employed to immobilize metal ions into interlayers of
clay Pillared interlayered clay is used as catalyst to
de-grade organic pollutants in Fenton process Clay can be
pillared with only iron cation [5, 6] or with the mixture of
iron and other cations, such as aluminum [7–9], zirconium
[10] In pillaring process, clays are swelled in water, and
∗This paper was presented at the International Workshop on
Ad-vanced Materials and Nanotechnology 2009 (IWAMN2009), Hanoi
University of Science, VNU, Hanoi, Vietnam, 24-25 November, 2009.
†Corresponding author: nguyendieucam@hus.edu.vn
TABLE I: Mineral composition of enriched Thanh Hoa clay Mineral concentration Concentration (% wt)
Zeolite (Heulandit +Chabazit) 3-5
then oligomeric metal cation complexes are added to ex-change with the interlayer cations After that, materials are dried and calcined, transforming metal polyoxocations into metal oxide pillared Properties of pillared clays de-pend on many conditions, such as origin, size of clays, polyoxocation solutions, and calcinating temperature, Pillared clay catalysts are easy to be collected after used
so that secondary pollution is prevented Moreover, the stability of catalysts is tested and this kind of catalyst is reusable
In this research, we present our results about catalytic properties of Al-Fe pillared clay We use this material to catalyze phenol degradation using advanced Fenton pro-cess with H2O2 Effects of pH on heterogeneous Fenton process are investigated
A Materials
Thanh Hoa bentonite (CEC = 71 meq/100g dried clay) provided by Truong Thinh company (mineral and chemi-cal composition is showed in Tables I, II and III), AlCl3, FeCl3, NaOH, phenol, H2O2(Merck), deionized water
Trang 2e-Journal of Surface Science and Nanotechnology Volume 9 (2011)
TABLE II: Chemical composition of original Thanh Hoa clay
FIG 1: XRD pattern of (a) bentonite and (b) modified bentonite
B Al-Fe pillared clay preparation
1 Pillared solution
Pillared solution was prepared at 338K by adding
NaOH solution gradually into AlCl3 and FeCl3 solution
while continuously stirring until the molar ratio OH/(Al
+ Fe) is 2/1 The molar ratio Al/Fe was 8.5/1.5 The
pillared solution was aged overnight
2 Al-Fe pillared clays
A 2 wt% clay suspension was adjusted to pH 9.1 and
swelled for 2 days Pillared solution was added into clay
suspension until achieving 10 mmol Al-Fe/1g clay The
suspension was stirred in 4 hours and aged for one day
at room temperature After that, the suspension was
fil-tered and washed with deionized water repeatedly until
completely eliminate chloride ion, then dried at 313, 343
and 383 K in 12 hour Finally the dried solid was calcined
at 673 K in 3 hours
C Phenol photocatalytic oxidation
The reaction was carried out in a sequencing batch
re-actor 300 mL of approximate 100 mg/L phenol solution
was added to the 500 mL beaker, then 0.5 g pillared clay
was added, and the suspension was stirred continuously
to make uniform suspension H2O2was added to the
sus-pension at the beginning of solar light irradiation The pH
of the solution was adjusted by HCl and NaOH solution
Phenol and iron ion concentration was determined
D Analytical method
Catalytic characterization was investigated by X-ray
diffraction method using D8 ADVANCE instrument
(Bruker-Germany), SEM (JEOS JSM - 5410 LV, Japan)
TABLE III: Chemical composition of enriched Thanh Hoa clay
TABLE IV: Interlayer distances of bentonite and modified bentonite
Concentration of phenol was determined by spectropho-tometric method using UV-VIS Novaspec II instrument (Germany) with 4-amino antipyrine as a color agent at
510 nm Concentration of iron was measured using 1,10 – phenanthroline as a color agent Cation exchange capac-ity of clay was measured by methylene blue adsorption method according to American Petroleum Institute
III RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A Material characterization
Chemical composition and physicochemical properties
of original bentonite and Al-Fe pillared clay were repre-sented in Tables I, II, III and IV
XRD patterns (Fig 1) showed that interlayer distance
FIG 2: SEM pattern of (a) bentonite and (b) modified ben-tonite
Trang 3Volume 9 (2011) Cam, et al.
FIG 3: UV pattern of (a) initial phenol solution and (b) phenol solution after 3 h of treatment
TABLE V: Interlayer distances of bentonite and modified
ben-tonite
Phenol conversion (%) 56.42 93.81 99.00 -
-Iron leaching (mg/L) 1.04 1.04 2.62 3.24 4.36
of bentonite modified by Fe/Al mixture was higher than
that of original bentonite From SEM patterns (Fig 2),
there is difference between pillared clay and original
Ben-tonite It proves that pillared clay was successfully
syn-thesized
B Catalytic efficiency of Al-Fe pillared clay
Preliminary test proved that phenols can not be
de-graded by H2O2 without Al-Fe pillared clay Phenol
re-moval caused by adsorption process on pillared clay was
not significant in comparison with that caused by
oxi-dation process Experiments proved that unpillared
ben-tonite can not degrade phenol Experimental data of
phe-nol conversion degree is presented in Table V and Fig 3
Reaction condition: 129 mg/L phenol solution, room
tem-perature, sunlight
Figure 3 shows that Al-Fe/Bent material has high
ef-ficiency under sunlight and room temperature condition
This is a promising material to apply in practice to treat
wastewater polluted by phenol in particular, and by
or-ganic pollutants, in general
C Effect of pH on heterogeneous Fenton reaction
Fenton reaction takes place rapidly at pH < 3 (if higher,
Fe(II) is precipitated, so that the efficiency decreases
sig-nificantly) To investigate the effect of pH on catalytic
property of Al-Fe pillared clay, experiments were carried
out at different pH Reaction was carried out at room
tem-perature with sunlight irradiation Results are showed in
Fig 4
FIG 4: atalytic property of Al-Fe pillared clay versus phenol conversion
From obtained data it can be concluded that the
cat-alytic efficiency of the material is significant when pH >3,
while homogeneous Fenton process is not efficient How-ever, when increasing pH, the induction period increases,
so that time for phenol to degrade completely is longer When pH = 3, after only 90 mins, the phenol conver-sion is 93.80%, but when increasing pH to 3.5, 4 and 4.4, the conversion of phenol decreases to 88.73%, 86.53% and 6.42% respectively Consequently, induction period is a function of pH
Many scientists think that the induction periods occur
in condensed phase, involving polymers [11], and it is not
in solution state Aqueous Fenton reactions catalyzed by pillared clay were observed several times [12], but their mechanism can not be clarified yet, because of lack of de-tails and involvement of condensed phases and adsorption onto material surface There can be two factors in re-sponse for induction periods: activation processes of sur-face iron by formation of complex with reactant sursur-face before oxidation takes place; or the need of time to dis-solve iron so that homogeneous Fenton reaction can occur The second reason has less possibility because
concentra-tion of iron is small (<2.5 mg/L) Inducconcentra-tion period might
result from protonation of iron surface
Trang 4e-Journal of Surface Science and Nanotechnology Volume 9 (2011)
FIG 5: Catalytic property of Al-Fe pillared clay versus phenol
conversion
FIG 6: Concentration of phenol and iron
D Test on the iron leaching
During reaction, iron from pillared clay is dissolved into
solution Concentration of iron tends to decrease when
in-creasing pH (Fig 5) Iron keeps leaching even when
phe-nol is completely degraded At higher pH, amount of iron
is smaller (at pH = 4.4, after reaction, concentration of
iron is 0.22 mg/L) It shows that amount of iron leaching
out and reusability not only depend on gradually oxida-tion between iron and phenol but also depend on pH In this work, concentration of iron after 7 hours of reaction
is smaller than 0.25 mg/L at pH 4.4 Consequently, the higher the pH, the smaller the leaching of iron However, optimum pH is chosen as 4.0 because of the shortest con-version time (1.5 h) and the lowest concentration of iron (0.48 mg/L)
E Reusability of Al-Fe – bent catalyst
The used material was collected, washed with large amount of deionized water and dried at room temper-ature It was then reused as catalyst for Fenton reac-tion Conditions were: 107.63 mg/L phenol solution, pH
4, room temperature, sunlight irradiation Results are presented in Fig 6
It can be seen from Fig 6 that Al-Fe-bent material still has catalytic activity, although it decreases For new material, it takes 1.5 hours to completely degrade phenol, but for reused material, it takes 2.5 hours
Al-Fe pillared clay was successfully synthesized from Thanh Hoa bentonite and Al, Fe ions Results proved that phenol treatment by adsorption is insignificant in comparison to that by catalysis process The experimen-tal data show that phenol degradation decreases while pH increases, and the optimum achieves at pH 4 Amount of iron leaching into wastewater strongly depends on pH, and it decreases sharply when pH increases
Acknowledgments
The support of this work by the National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (Project code 104.99.153.09) is gratefully acknowledged
[1] A Vlyssides, E M Barampouti, S Mai, and A Vlyssides,
Environ Eng Sci 25, 327 (2008).
[2] C Walling, Acc Chem Res 8, 125 (1975).
[3] D H Bremner, A E Burgess, D Houllemare, and K.-C
Namkung, Appl Catal B 63, 15 (2006).
[4] H J H Fenton, J Chem Soc Trans 65, 899 (1894).
[5] Y J Feng, X Hu, and P L Yue, Environ Sci Technol
38, 5773 (2004).
[6] J Feng, X Hu, and P L Yue, Environ Sci Technol 38,
269 (2004)
[7] F Tomul and S Balci, G U J Science 21, 21 (2008).
[8] J T Kloprogge, R Evans, L Hickey, and R L Frost,
Appl Clay Sci 20, 157 (2002).
[9] N Ksontini, W Najjar, and A Ghorbel, J Phys Chem
Solids 69, 1112 (2008).
[10] C B Molina, J A Casas, J A Zazo, and J J Rodr´ıguez,
Chem Eng J 118, 29 (2006).
[11] P Simon, J Therm Anal Calorim 84, 263 (2006).
[12] J Fraga-Dubreuil, J Garcia-Serna, E Garcia-Verdugo, L
M Dudd, G R Aird, W B.Thomas, and M Poliakoff, J
Supercrit Fluids 39, 220 (2006).