DSpace at VNU: An Exploration of How Perceptions of the Risk of Avian Influenza in Poultry Relate to Urbanization in Vie...
Trang 1An Exploration of How Perceptions of the Risk of Avian
Influenza in Poultry Relate to Urbanization in Vietnam
Melissa L Finucane,1,2 Tuyen Nghiem,3Sumeet Saksena,1Lam Nguyen,4Jefferson Fox,1
James H Spencer,5and Trinh Dinh Thau4
1 East-West Center, 1601 East-West Rd, Honolulu, HI 96848
2 RAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
3 Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam
4 Hanoi University of Agriculture, Hanoi, Vietnam
5 Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634
Abstract: This research examined how perceptions of outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI)
subtype H5N1 in poultry are related to urbanization Via in-depth interviews with village leaders, household
farmers, and large farm operators in modern, transitional, and traditional communes in the north of Vietnam,
we explored behaviors, attitudes, cultural values, and traditions that might amplify or attenuate HPAI
out-breaks We also explored conceptualizations of urbanization and its impacts on animal husbandry and disease
outbreaks Qualitative theme analyses identified the key impacts, factors related to HPAI outbreaks, and disease
prevention and management strategies The analyses also highlighted how urbanization improves some aspects
of life (e.g., food security, family wealth and health, more employment opportunities, and improved
infra-structure), but simultaneously poses significant challenges for poultry farming and disease management
Awareness of qualitative aspects of HPAI risk perceptions and behaviors and how they vary with urbanization
processes may help to improve the prevention and management of emerging infectious diseases
Keywords: risk perception, urbanization, avian influenza, HPAI, poultry, Vietnam
INTRODUCTION
Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) subtype H5N1
emerged in Southeast Asia in 2003, with repeated outbreaks
causing poultry and economic losses on a large scale
Anthropogenic and ecological studies suggest that the spread
of HPAI may be related to the ongoing process of replacing
traditional farming methods (e.g., multispecies livestock
husbandry) with industrial, mass-production-oriented
operations (e.g., Mallin and Cahoon2003); especially when the number of poultry houses and other connected estab-lishments increases without proper planning (Capua and Marangon 2000) Opportunities for disease transmission increase with industrial poultry production because of in-creases in livestock pools, intensive rearing of multiple spe-cies, and semi-vertical integration systems where, for instance feed trucks, abattoir delivery, and other vehicles, may visit several farms daily (Dent et al.2008) Gilbert et al (2008) demonstrated that a few key factors, such as human popu-lation density, rice cropping intensity, and poultry density, explain a large proportion of the spatial variation in HPAI
Correspondence to: Melissa L Finucane, e-mail: Melissa.Finucane@EastWestCenter.
Original Contribution
Ó 2014 International Association for Ecology and Health
Trang 2disease risk The same study also highlighted that a
consid-erable variation remains unexplained and factors, such as
poultry production, marketing systems, or other dimensions
of human behavior, should be considered
Only a few studies have examined the perceived risk of
HPAI in poultry Studies in Thailand (Takeuchi2006), Laos
(Barennes et al.2007), and Cambodia (Ly et al.2007) suggest
that few people are aware of HPAI symptoms in poultry and
that many think it is unlikely to occur in their flocks Few
people report that they would notify authorities of poultry
deaths, despite believing that it is important to report the
deaths The most common reasons for non-reporting include
lack of knowledge about or inaccessibility of the reporting
procedure, fears of culling, and fears of being unable to sell the
remaining poultry The above studies were sampled from
areas reflecting different levels of urbanization but did not
report differences among urban, semi-urban, and rural
sub-samples, even though the level of urbanization may be related
to avian influenza outbreaks (Spencer2013) Thus, we do not
know (1) whether perceived risk varies with levels of
urban-ization and (2) how people conceptualize urbanurban-ization and its
impacts on animal husbandry and disease outbreaks
Vietnam provides an excellent site for this research because
as a result of its rapidly growing economy (5% GDP real growth
rate for 2012; Central Intelligence Agency 2013) it is
experi-encing rapid environmental transformations Urbanization in
Vietnam has substantially changed farmers’ interactions with
natural systems For example, transportation has become
motorized, increasing the potential for disease to spread further
and more easily from one farm or commune to another via
feces on moped or truck tires Understanding perceptions of
urbanization and its relationship with HPAI outbreaks in
poultry is important because urbanization and the resulting
infrastructure create a filter which distances people from the
environment and affects their ability to perceive changes in
natural resources (Lilian et al.2007) Failing to perceive change
potentially threatens a community’s ability to respond
appro-priately To fill the gap in knowledge about whether and how
HPAI outbreaks are related to urbanization, we conducted two
exploratory studies with village leaders, household farmers, and
large farm operators in the north of Vietnam
Research Design
A qualitative research design was used to allow participants
to describe beliefs and experiences about HPAI in poultry
and urbanization in their own words, rather than as a choice between the predetermined survey responses (Morgan 1998; O’Brien 1993; Pope and Mays 1995) We established sampling frames (see below) that included tra-ditional settings (customary agricultural practices, housing, and water sources), modern settings (agricultural mod-ernization, industrial cities, and modern water sources), and transitional settings (a mix of traditional and modern agricultural practices, housing, and water sources) The variables we used to identify these settings were reported previously as metrics of urbanization potentially associated with outbreaks of HPAI in poultry (e.g., Spencer 2013; Pfieffer et al.2007; Fang et al.2008; Gilbert et al.2008)
Participants
For both Studies 1 and 2, a research assistant from Hanoi University of Agriculture arranged permissions and scheduled people to attend the interviews Individuals were recruited using a purposive sampling technique with the goal of obtaining diverse samples regarding age, gender, and farming activities Participants were informed about the purpose of the study, the nature of the questions, and that they could refuse to answer questions or withdraw from the study at any time Each participant was paid 30,000–200,000 VND (approximately $1.44–$9.60 USD) to compensate for their time and travel expenses
The sample for Study 1 included 43 people recruited from four communes1in Bac Ninh Province, Vietnam The communes were selected as representative of different levels
of urbanization based on an index of water source coher-ence (Spcoher-encer2013) calculated from variables in the 1999 Vietnam census The index reflects the amount of ‘‘mixing’’
of different types of household-level water supply (well, rain, bottled, or surface water) Table1 shows the demo-graphics and other characteristics of the sample
To identify participants for Study 2, we created a sampling frame using the 2006 Vietnam agricultural census following the methods developed by Saksena et al (2013) All the communes were classified into three groups reflecting different levels of urbanization (traditional, transitional, or modern) using hierarchical cluster analysis with the following criteria: (1) percent of houses whose main income is from agricultural, fishing, or forestry activities and (2) percent of houses that have a modern
1 The smallest administrative unit in Vietnam is usually the commune, but in more urban areas they may be called a ward or town.
Trang 3toilet system The resulting characteristics of these three groups are shown in Table2
The Study 2 sample included a total of 33 participants from communes at all the three levels of urbanization, but with an emphasis on transitional areas because of our interest in understanding perceptions of change Table3
shows the demographics and other characteristics of the sample
Materials and Procedures
For both studies, individual and small-group interviews followed a semi-structured protocol Study 1 participants were asked first to comment on their experience of avian influenza in poultry (e.g., ‘‘Tell me what you know about avian influenza in birds and how it affects you, your family,
Table 1 Study 1 Participant Characteristics (n = 43)
Commune, Province (urbanization level), n (%)
Thai Bao, Bac Ninh (modern) 14 (32.6)
Quang Pho Thanh, Bac Ninh (transitional) 15 (34.9)
Ninh Xa, Bac Ninh (transitional) 10 (23.3)
Dai Dong, Bac Ninh (traditional) 4 (9.3)
Participant type, n (%)
Gender, n (%)
Age, years, range (mean) 29–61 (46.57)
Ethnicity, n (%)
Education, n (%)
Vocational school or some college 11 (25.6)
Completed 4-year college or more 5 (11.6)
Primary profession, n (%)
Manager/Deputy Manager 3 (7.0)
Professional (e.g., lawyer, doctor, teacher) 1 (2.3)
Other (Head of Village
and Agricultural Extension Officer)
2 (4.7)
Annual household income,
VND, range (mean)
150,000–
300,000,000 (49,335,135) Housing, n (%)
Solid (concrete walled) 19 (44.2)
Semisolid (bamboo or concrete) 6 (14.0)
Wood frame with cottage roof
(bamboo, thatch)
11 (25.6) Temporary one-floor house 5 (11.6)
Two- or three-floor strong house 2 (4.7)
Type of latrine, n (%)
Household septic latrine 31 (72.1)
Pour-flush filtered latrine 2 (4.7)
Ventilated improved pit latrine 8 (18.6)
Table 1 continued
Main source of fresh water, n (%)
Purchased water (tank, jar, bottle, etc.) 0 (0)
River, lake, pond water 0 (0)
Animals farmed in the previous 12 months, (n participants raising animal),
livestock count range (mean) Chicken (n = 36) 5–10,000 (972.6)
Other bird (n = 3) 10–1,200 (28.6)
Fish (n = 13) 300–30,000 (1757.9) Other animals (e.g., dog, goose) (n = 4) 1–50 (2.6) Crops, n farming crop (percent)
Other cereals (e.g., corn) 18 (21.2)
Trang 4and your community?’’) Then more specific probes asked
about their understanding of risk exposure processes, HPAI
effects, risk assessment and management, and Vietnamese
values and traditions relevant to animal husbandry and
disease management (e.g., ‘‘What role do spiritual beliefs
play in preventing or managing disease outbreaks among
your animals?’’) Study 2 participants were asked to
com-ment on their understanding of ‘‘rural’’ and ‘‘urban’’ (e.g.,
‘‘What does rural mean to you?’’) and how urbanization
affects: the built and natural landscapes, farming practices,
livelihoods, quality of life, waste management systems, and
HPAI in poultry
The interviews were facilitated jointly by the first
au-thor (asking questions in English) and the second auau-thor
(translating questions and responses) During individual
and small-group interviews, the facilitators and two
assis-tants recorded by hand the information about participants’
remarks and nonverbal responses Audio recordings were
not made because the topic was deemed too sensitive Each
interview took 1–2 h
For Study 1, nine small-group interviews (with 3–6
individuals per group) were held with 43 participants over
3 days (May 25–27, 2010) in meeting rooms at the
com-mune headquarters of each of the three comcom-munes in Bac
Ninh Province: Thai Bao (Day 1), Quang Pho Thanh (Day
2), and Ninh Xa (Day 3) Three groups were interviewed
each day One group comprised village leaders, one group
comprised household farmers, and one group comprised
large farm operators
For Study 2, three small-group interviews (with 5–12
individuals per group) were held with 23 participants over
3 days (July 25–27, 2011) at each of the three communes in
Quang Ninh Province: Viet Hung (Day 1), Bang Ca (Day
2), and Cam Tay (Day 3) Two groups were held in meeting
rooms at the commune headquarters and one was held at a farmer’s house Individual interviews were held with ten participants
Data Analysis
For Study 1, qualitative theme analysis (Bernard and Ryan 1998; Crabtree and Miller1999) using ATLAS.ti (version 5) was used to distinguish the salient constructs and to identify words commonly used to describe attitudes and experiences Following the guidelines presented by Fereday and Muir-Cochrane (2006), the coding template was developed using a hybrid of the data-driven inductive ap-proach of Boyatzis (1998) and the deductive a priori tem-plate of codes approach outlined by Crabtree and Miller (1999) Core themes that repeatedly appeared in notes of the interview discussions were identified by the lead author and confirmed by a research assistant Consensus was achieved via discussion For Study 2, the key-words-in-context technique (Tesch1990) was used to find instances
of key words in field notes Themes were then identified by sorting the examples into groups of similar meaning, retaining information about the sources of the examples Given that this research focused largely on identifying perceptions that do not necessarily have a correct answer, respondents’ trustworthiness was assessed by asking knowledgeable locals (e.g., village veterinarian) or members
of the local research team to corroborate the plausibility of responses Confirmability was assessed, where possible, by asking respondents to verify some statements (e.g., that there is no place to take dead animals) via a tour of their vicinity Credibility was assessed frequently during inter-views by checking respondents’ agreement with paraphra-sings of their comments
FINDINGS
Study 1: HPAI Risk Perceptions
Key Impacts
Overall, participants were very concerned about HPAI outbreaks, referring to the disease as an ‘‘epidemic,’’ ‘‘a scary disease,’’ ‘‘a big worry,’’ and ‘‘very dangerous,’’ par-ticularly because of the relatively high fatality rate of HPAI
in poultry One participant described the death of chickens from HPAI as ‘‘equal to robbing because it takes away our
Table 2 Characteristics of three groups (traditional,
transi-tional, and modern) of communes
Type of
commune
Percent of houses whose main income
is from agricultural, fishing, or forestry activities
Percent of houses with modern toilets
Trang 5livelihood with no warning or reason.’’ Participants from
all the communes agreed that the most worrisome aspect of
HPAI was at the household level when substantial
invest-ments and their main income source were lost
Factors Related to HPAI Outbreaks
Modernization and Pollution Participants varied in the
factors they emphasized as important in the spread of
HPAI in poultry, but many focused on the process of
modernization and associated increase in pollution prob-lems Participants from all the communes observed that rapid population increase and economic development had
a detrimental impact on their environment The increased volume of waste from livestock and household garbage, which was perceived to be poorly managed and hard to control, was viewed as a key source of air, land, and water pollution (e.g., dead chickens are thrown onto the street or into fish ponds) Many participants noted the importance
of keeping a clean farm to prevent disease One participant (from a transitional commune) indicated that he kept his farm clean; but that he could not control the whole system, which he observed to be increasingly interdependent Par-ticipants from the traditional commune emphasized the role of transportation in spreading the virus (e.g., trucks spread disease via their tires when transporting feed and international movement of livestock)
Farming Practices The trade-offs of new versus old farming practices were emphasized For instance, some participants (modern commune) commented that the new, industrial way is good because ‘‘the feed is more relaxing’’ (i.e., farmers do not have to collect or prepare the feed) and the livestock have more economic value However, they also noted that the industrial feed may use too many chemicals, be moldy, or cause chickens to put on weight too fast, causing the livestock to be more prone to disease Farm Size Participants had differing opinions on the role
of the farm size Some participants (modern and transi-tional communes) tended to believe that small and large operations were equally likely to experience an outbreak of disease Some participants in transitional communes, however, emphasized that the high-volume farming oper-ations caused environmental problems because the chicken density was too high and that small-scale operations posed fewer problems Others noted that large operators were more cautious and thus more likely to vaccinate their livestock, but that small-scale farmers were more able to check each chicken and to detect a problem early
Poultry Varieties Most participants agreed that traditional Vietnamese chickens have a higher resistance (and do not require much care) than industrial broiler or layer chickens, but that the latter were more profitable Some noted that compared with broiler chickens, layer chickens were probably less vulnerable because they were kept on a high floor (for easy egg retrieval)
Table 3 Study 2 Participant Characteristics (n = 33)
Commune, Province (urbanization level), n (%)
Mo Lao, Ha Dong (modern) 1 (3.0)
Cam Tay, Quang Ninh (modern) 8 (24.2)
Viet Hung, Quang Ninh (transitional) 13 (39.4)
Phu Luong, Ha Dong (transitional) 1 (3.0)
Quoc Oai, Ha Tay (transitional) 1 (3.0)
Phung Xa, Thach That (transitional) 2 (6.1)
Bang Ca, Quang Ninh (traditional) 7 (21.2)
Participant type, n (%)
Gender, n (%)
Age, years, range (mean) (n = 29) 25–69 (47.9)
Ethnicity, n (%)
Education, n (%)
Vocational school or some college 3 (9.1)
Completed 4-year college or more 0 (0)
Primary profession, n (%)
Non-agricultural wage laborer 3 (9.1)
Professional (e.g., lawyer, doctor, teacher) 0 (0)
Other (e.g., student, homemaker) 8 (24.2)
Annual household income,
VND, range (mean) (n = 22)
10,000,000–
168,000,000 (49,154,545)
Trang 6Seasonal Variation Most participants noted that
out-breaks were more likely around Teˆt, the Vietnamese New
Year, which usually falls in the western calendar months of
January or February and is a period when more chickens
are raised and exposure is more likely One participant
noted that the powder of xoan (Melia azedarach) flower
(which flowers in spring) causes HPAI
Wild Birds When asked about the role of wild birds, some
said that they had heard about this issue in the media, but
thought it was unlikely to be an important factor because of
a lack of wild birds in their area (in part because villagers
shoot them) Others suggested that wild birds may play a
role in disease outbreaks
Disease Management Strategies
Vaccination Vaccination was generally thought to be
effective, though problematic when poultry are already sick
Some participants from the traditional commune indicated
that they might not buy the vaccine until their poultry was
sick because it was too expensive Both the household
farmers and large operators in transitional and traditional
communes expressed reservations about vaccine
effective-ness Some participants stressed the problems in obtaining
high-quality vaccines (e.g., distributors might dilute it, not
keep it cool during transportation, or sell expired bottles)
and that the availability of too many brands of unknown
quality was confusing
Waste and Disease Management Systems Participants
dis-cussed the need for better waste and disease management
systems Several noted that there was no place to take dead
animals (so they were buried in the paddy fields near the
communes with lime) and there was little systematic
guid-ance about how to deal with waste or disease One participant
in a transitional commune stressed that there was noone to
identify and quarantine the source of an outbreak and that
sometimes quarantine restrictions were implemented too
late One participant (modern commune) observed that
people do not always report poultry deaths Another
par-ticipant (transitional commune) stressed that reporting
deaths brought little extra support Some participants
indi-cated that they were not willing to make reports because they
did not want to precipitate in new culling campaigns
Uncertainty, Knowledge, and Training In general,
partici-pants expressed a desire for more knowledge and training
about disease management options and more consultation opportunities (e.g., about which vaccine to use) One participant (transitional commune) suggested that an early warning system would be helpful (e.g., providing forecasts about when each province will be most likely to experience
an outbreak) Others reflected on the importance of mass media (television and newspapers) as a source of infor-mation about HPAI origins and impacts
Support Systems Key sources of support for understand-ing and managunderstand-ing HPAI included village veterinarians, village leaders, and faculty at the Hanoi University of Agriculture When asked about the role of spirituality, some participants said it did not play an important role in disease management, but others noted that they thought it was important to put food on their altars or to pray internally to ask their ancestors for good health and pro-duction
Figure 1schematically depicts these qualitative themes and their relationships as described in the interview dis-cussions
Study 2: Perceptions of Urbanization and its Impacts
Characteristics of Rural and Urban Settings
Participants from all the communes agreed that the key characteristics of a rural setting include: good or support-ive, sharing relationships and emotional ties among resi-dents; a feeling of coolness and clean, pure air; and agricultural activities (using the land for farming to pro-duce food and raise livestock) They also noted that rural houses were spacious with old-style (pit) toilets In con-trast, key characteristics of an urban setting include: weaker emotional ties among residents; large-scale industrial development; better quality houses with more furniture; a closed sewage system; piped water for cooking; less space (e.g., to raise children); and more closed doors and private spaces Participants noted that income in urban areas typically comes from trading and selling services, that there are a lot of jobs, and that it is easier to make money
Process of Urbanization
Participants from the traditional commune of Bang Ca said that the process of urbanization had been mostly
Trang 7worth-while, but that it came with both positive and negative
aspects (e.g., the modernization of agriculture increased the
spraying of chemicals to improve crop productivity but
posed a human health risk) Participants in the traditional
settings noted that there has been no change in the type of
toilets or home gardens, but that forested areas have
de-creased (the land is being used for roads, houses, and
mines) and environmental pollution has increased One
man noted that the environment was ‘‘cooler’’ in the past
when their houses were made from wood (rather than
ce-ment) and were placed lower in the valley (rather than
higher up the hillside) Residents in the traditional areas
can now take advantage of more and different (nonfarm)
income sources (e.g., making baskets), but some people still
did not have enough money to cover the basic living
ex-penses They reported that ‘‘civilization is more accessible’’
(e.g., through television, which is available in every house),
but that the traditional customs (praying, ceremonies, and
shamans) remained the same
Participants in the transitional communes (Viet Hung,
Phu Luong, Quoc Oai, and Phung Xa) noted rapid change
over the past 20 years They highlighted not only
improv-ing food security and food diversity, but also new envi-ronmental and health problems (e.g., pesticides and diabetes) One female farmer said that urbanization brought more needs (e.g., her children want to go out for breakfast instead of staying at home like they used to) and that it is more difficult to earn money Another participant noted that the number and types of houses were changing (‘‘no more bamboo fences or simple tile roof houses’’) and that the environment felt ‘‘hotter.’’ Participants described how land value has decreased because it was rezoned for industry; but then industries were not developed, leaving them in ‘‘suspense,’’ not knowing how long they can keep farming their land Participants mentioned that there are more nonfarm income sources and that people now worked for individuals or households rather than the cooperative Despite the negative aspects of transition, participants generally agreed that transition is worthwhile because their living standard and well-being has improved and they have more time to rest
Participants in the modern communes (Cam Tay and
Ha Dong) thought that in general urbanization is worth-while, but that sometimes people cannot keep up with a Figure 1 A mental model of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreaks as reflected in interview discussions with village leaders, household farmers, and large farm operators in modern, transitional, and traditional communes in Bac Ninh Province, Vietnam
Trang 8rapid rate or high number of changes They noted how
urbanization has changed the ‘‘coolness’’ of their
envi-ronment, primarily by the removal of trees Other
partici-pants reported that the amount and type of housing was
changing in their area (e.g., from thatched or tile roofs to
brick roofs), but not too fast Every house now has its own
toilet and reliable electricity Stream flow has decreased so
residents buy trucked water for cooking and use catchment
water for washing Participants noted that food security has
improved and there is less hardship Human health is also
better because of improved access to health care and
awareness of disease prevention strategies Families have
fewer children Also, relationships among neighbors have
changed, with more private spaces and less visits because
people are spending more time working
Impact of Urbanization on Poultry and Disease Outbreaks
Participants in the traditional commune reported difficulty
in controlling poultry disease, especially when poultry are
bought from outside the commune and have an unknown
vaccination record They said that their poultry’s health was
not affected by water pollution or human waste, but was
affected by increasing animal density and chemicals in the
environment Modern treatments were available to deal
with disease, but there was uncertainty about what is most
effective One farmer said that they cannot prepare
effec-tively because they do not know what is needed
In contrast, participants in transitional communes
commented that their ability to raise poultry has improved
because they have more medicines and training from the
government on how to use those medicines and deal with
disease They reported vaccinating frequently, so their
exposure to disease is less They felt that it is easier to
quarantine sick animals with the increases in fences and
walls
Participants in the modern communes noted that
animal and human waste can cause disease, but that it does
not happen in their commune Air and water pollution
were identified as causing poultry disease One participant
said that it was easier for poultry to get sick now because
the weather was unstable (changing between extremely hot
to extremely cold) and food is now freely exchanged among
areas (e.g., sickness spreads across the commune easily
when a sick chicken is brought in from another commune)
Animal density was also thought to cause disease because
there was less air for the poultry to breathe
DISCUSSION
HPAI is Perceived as Risky and Disease Manage-ment is Linked with Urbanization Processes
Across the communes, HPAI in poultry was viewed by the participants as a dangerous epidemic with worrying eco-nomic consequences The role of change in agriculture in the spread of HPAI was recognized Both new and old farming practices were perceived as having advantages and disadvantages Participants were sensitive to the roles of farm size, type of chicken, seasonal variation, and wild birds in the spread of HPAI The most prominent disease management strategies focused on vaccination, quarantine, and farm and commune hygiene; with calls for better information and training programs to assist farmers These findings are not only consistent with Fielding
et al.’s (2009) description of lay explanations for the cause
of HPAI in humans, but also extend our understanding of risk mental models to explain the perceived causes of HPAI
in poultry The present results are consistent with studies finding a reluctance to report poultry deaths to authorities because of fears of culling and economic impacts (Barennes
et al 2007; Ly et al 2007; Sultana et al 2012; Takeuchi 2006) However, participants in our study seemed to ex-press more motivation for improving waste and disease management practices compared with the previous studies The results of the present research support the notion that urbanization changes people’s ability to respond appropriately to variations in their environment The inability to respond is not necessarily because of an inability to perceive change (cf Lilian et al.2007) Rather, our participants described a rapid and extensive change that poses different challenges for poultry management as communes move from rural to transitional to urban set-tings
Limitations
The first limitation of this research is that samples were drawn from people willing and able to participate in a 2-h interview and may not represent the general population of farmers in Vietnam in terms of sociodemographic variables such as age, education, and income There is also a gender imbalance in each study, potentially biasing the perspec-tives obtained toward issues most relevant to the majority gender However, the consistency of the findings from this
Trang 9study with those reported elsewhere encourages the
confi-dence that many of the observations are generalizable
A second limitation concerns the small size of samples
in these studies It is possible that additional information
would have been obtained with a broader sample of
indi-viduals Within this sample, however, we believe that the
questions posed were thoroughly addressed at least by
modern and transitional commune participants because
little new information was obtained in the final interviews
This phenomenon is called saturation in qualitative
re-search and indicates that a topic has been adequately
sampled (i.e., enough interviews conducted) Another
limitation of the small sample sizes is that they do not
permit statistical differences to be analyzed and thus
con-clusions are restricted to the descriptive statements elicited
Finally, the topic of avian influenza is a sensitive issue
that participants may have been reluctant to discuss openly,
especially in a group setting Other research suggests that
farmers are reluctant to report cases of animal illness
be-cause of fears of culling and loss of income (e.g., Sultana
et al 2012) This is a limitation of most investigations
relying on self-report, but was minimized in the present
research by building good rapport and selecting a diverse
sample to increase the chance of including some more open
participants Nonetheless, constrained responses limit our
capacity to draw conclusions
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
The exploratory nature of this research established preliminary
qualitative information about a topic poorly documented to
date, namely how perceptions of HPAI risk in poultry relate to
urbanization in Vietnam The research findings offer a first step
toward understanding mental models of disease risk and
urbanization in a developing country context The findings
raise several interesting questions for future research: What
research methods (e.g., anonymous surveys) are effective at
capturing representative perspectives of a sensitive issue in a
rapidly changing environment? How well do risk perceptions
correspond with the actual outbreaks of disease in poultry and
does the relationship vary with setting (traditional, transitional,
modern)? What analytic methods are needed to identify the
components of urbanization that best predict the perceived risk
and the actual outbreaks of avian influenza in poultry?
Addressing these and other questions will help policymakers be
better informed about the optimal risk prevention and
man-agement strategies in diverse settings
The authors are grateful to colleagues at the Hanoi University of Agriculture for assistance in conducting interviews; to Boonyarit Itsara and Charles Nguyen for assistance in verifying and analyzing data The authors also thank Michael DiGregorio, Nancy Lewis, and Bruce Wilcox for assistance in developing the interview protocol This work was funded by the National Science Foundation Grant # DEB-0909410
REFERENCES Barennes H, Martinez-Aussel B, Vongphrachanh P, Strobel M (2007) Avian influenza risk perceptions, Laos (letter) Emerging Infectious Diseases 13(7):1126
Bernard HR, Ryan GW (1998) Text Analysis: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods In: Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology, Bernard HR (editor), Walnut Creek: Altamira Boyatzis R (1998) Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development, Thousand Oaks: Sage
Capua I, Marangon S (2000) The avian influenza epidemic in Italy, 1999–2000: a review Avian Pathology 29:289–294 Central Intelligence Agency (2013) The World Factbook
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/ geos/vm.html Accessed 25 July 2013
Crabtree B, Miller W (1999) A template approach to text analysis: developing and using codebooks In: Doing Qualitative Research, Crabtree B, Miller W (editors), Newbury Park: Sage, pp 163–177 Dent JE, Kao RR, Kiss IZ, Hyder K, Arnold M (2008) Contact structures in the poultry industry in Great Britain: exploring transmission routes for a potential avian influenza virus epi-demic BMC Veterinary Research 4:27
Fang L, de Vlas SJ, Liang S, Looman CWN, Gong P, Xu B, et al (2008) Environmental factors contributing to the spread of H5N1 avian influenza in mainland China PLoS One 3(5):e2268–e2268 Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development International Journal of Qual-itative Methods 5(1):1–11
Fielding R, Leung GM, Lam WWT, Jiang CQ, Sitthi-Amorn C, Ahn LV, et al (2009) A pan-Asian survey of risk perception, attitudes and practices associated with live animal markets Hong Kong Medical Journal 15(5):17–20
Gilbert M, Xiangming X, Pfeiffer DU, Epprecht M, Boles S, Czarnecki C, et al (2008) Mapping H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza risk in Southeast Asia Proceedings of the Na-tional Academy of Sciences 105:4769–4774
Lilian A, Kliskey A, Williams P (2007) The distancing effect of modernization on the perception of water resources in Arctic communities Polar Geography 30(3–4):175–191
Ly S, Van Kerkhove MD, Davun Holl D, Froehlich Y, Vong S (2007) Interactions between humans and poultry, rural Cam-bodia Emerging Infectious Diseases 13(1):130–132
Mallin MA, Cahoon LB (2003) Industrialized animal production?
A major source of nutrient and microbial pollution to aquatic ecosystems Population and Environment 24:369–385
Trang 10Morgan D (1998) The Focus Group Guidebook, Thousand Oaks:
Sage
O’Brien K (1993) Improving Survey Questionnaires Through
Focus Groups In: Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State
of the Art, Morgan D (editor), Newbury Park: Sage, pp 105–117
Pfieffer DU, Minh PQ, Martin V, Epprecht M, Otte MJ (2007) An
analysis of the spatial and temporal patterns of highly
patho-genic avian influenza occurrence in Vietnam using national
surveillance data The Veterinary Journal 174:302–309
Pope C, Mays N (1995) Researching the parts other methods
cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health
and health services research British Medical Journal 311:42–45
Saksena S, Trinh DT, Pham NL, Sultana N, Finucane ML, Fox JM
(2013) Animal husbandry and farm-level bio-security practices
across the rural to urban gradient in Vietnam and their
rela-tionship to avian influenza Paper presented at the American Association of Geographers, Los Angeles, CA, April 11, 2013 Spencer JH (2013) The urban health transition hypothesis: empirical evidence of an avian influenza Kuznets curve in Viet Nam? Journal of Urban Health 90(2):343–357
Sultana R, Rimi NA, Azad S, Islam MS, Khan MSU, Gurley ES,
et al (2012) Bangladeshi backyard poultry raisers’ perceptions and practices related to zoonotic transmission of avian influ-enza Journal of Infection in Developing Countries 6(2):156–165 Takeuchi MT (2006) Avian influenza risk communication, Thai-land (letter) Emerging Infectious Diseases 12(7):1172–1173 Tesch R (1990) Qualitative research: analysis types and software tools New York: Falmer