LHCb Collaboration, Measurement ofJ=ψ production inpp collisions atpffiffiffis¼ 7 TeV,Eur.. CDF Collaboration, Measurement of theb-hadron production cross section using decays to μ − D0X final
Trang 1Measurement of the b-Quark Production Cross Section in 7 and 13 TeV pp Collisions
R Aaijet al.* (LHCb Collaboration)
(Received 15 December 2016; revised manuscript received 9 January 2017; published 3 February 2017)
Measurements of the cross section for producingb quarks in the reaction pp → bbX are reported in
7 and 13 TeV collisions at the LHC as a function of the pseudorapidityη in the range 2 < η < 5 covered
by the acceptance of the LHCb experiment The measurements are done using semileptonic decays of
b-flavored hadrons decaying into a ground-state charmed hadron in association with a muon The cross
sections in the coveredη range are 72.0 0.3 6.8 and 154.3 1.5 14.3 μb for 7 and 13 TeV The ratio
is 2.14 0.02 0.13, where the quoted uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively The
agreement with theoretical expectation is good at 7 TeV, but differs somewhat at 13 TeV The measured
ratio of cross sections is larger at lowerη than the model prediction
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.052002
Production ofb quarks in high energy pp collisions at the
LHC provides a sensitive test of models based on quantum
chromodynamics[1] Searches for physics beyond the
stan-dard model (SM) often rely on the ability to accurately predict
the production rates ofb quarks that can form backgrounds in
combination with other high energy processes[2] In addition,
knowledge of theb-quark yield is essential for calculating
the sensitivity of experiments testing the SM by measuring
CP-violating and rare decay processes[3]
We present here measurements of production cross
sec-tions for the average ofb-flavored and b-flavored hadrons,
denotedpp → HbX, where X indicates additional particles,
inpp collisions recorded by LHCb at both 7 and 13 TeV
center-of-mass energies, and their ratio These measurements
are made as a function of the Hb pseudorapidity η in the
interval2 < η < 5, where η ¼ − ln ½tanðθ=2Þ, and θ is the
angle of the weakly decayingb or b hadron with respect to
the proton direction We report results over the full range
ofb-hadron transverse momentum, pT TheHbcross section
has been previously measured at LHCb in 7 TeV collisions
using semileptonic decays to D0μ−X [4] and b → J=ψX
decays [5] Previous determinations were made at the
Tevatron collider inpp collisions near 2 TeV center-of-mass
energy [6] Other LHC experiments have also measured
b-quark production characteristics at 7[7], and 13 TeV[8]
The method presented in this Letter is more accurate because
the normalization is based on well-measured semileptonicB0
andB−branching fractions, and the equality of semileptonic
widths for all b hadrons, in contrast to inclusive J=ψ
production which relies on the assumption that theb-hadron
particle species are produced in the same proportions as at LEP[9], or those that just use one specificb hadron, which needs theb-hadron fractions to extrapolate to the total The production cross section for a hadron Hb that
contains either ab or b quark, but not both, is given by
σðpp → HbXÞ ¼1
2½σðB0Þ þ σðB0Þ þ
1
2½σðBþÞ þ σðB−Þ
þ12½σðB0
sÞ þ σðB0
sÞ
þ1 þ δ
2 ½σðΛ0bÞ þ σðΛ0
where δ is a correction that accounts for Ξb and Ω−
b
baryons; we ignoreBcmesons since their production level
is estimated to be only 0.1% ofb hadrons[10] Our estimate ofδ is based on a paper by Voloshin[11],
in which two useful relations are given:
ΓðΞ−
b → Ξ−Xμ−νÞ ¼ ΓðΛ0
b→ ΛXμ−νÞ;
and σðΞ−
bÞ σðΛ0
bÞ¼ 0.11 0.03 0.03; ð2Þ where the latter is determined from Tevatron data, and the second uncertainty is assigned from the allowable SU(3) symmetry breaking The b-hadron fractions determined there[9]agree with the ones measured by LHCb for other b-flavored hadrons[12] Since the lifetimes of theΛ0
band
Ξ−
b are equal within their uncertainties[9], assuming that
the two branching fractions are equal gives us an estimate
of 0.11 for theΞ−
b=Λ0
b semileptonic decay ratio However,
this must be doubled, using isospin invariance, to account for theΞ0
b To this we must add theΩ−
b contribution, taken
as 15% of the Ξb, thus arriving at an estimate of δ of 0.25 0.10, where the uncertainty is the one in Eq (2)
*Full author list given at end of the article
Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license
Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to
the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation,
and DOI
PRL 118, 052002 (2017)
Trang 2added in quadrature to our estimate of the uncertainties
from assuming isospin and lifetime equalities
To measure these cross sections we determine the signal
yields ofb decays into a charm hadron plus a muon for a
given integrated luminosity L and correct for various
efficiencies described below Explicitly,
σðpp → HbXÞ
¼ 1
2L
nðD0μÞ
ϵD0×BD0þ nðDþμÞ
ϵDþ×BDþ
1 BðB → DXμνÞ þ
nðDþ
sμÞ
ϵDþ
s ×BDþ
s
1 BðBs→ DsXμνÞ þ
nðΛþ
cμÞ
ϵΛþ
c ×BΛþ
c
1 þ δ BðΛ0
b→ Λþ
cXμνÞ
wherenðXcμÞ means the number of detected charm hadron
plus muon events and their charge conjugates, with
corresponding efficiencies denoted by ϵXc The charm
branching fractions,BXc, used in this analysis, along with
their sources, are listed in the Supplemental Material[13]
The PDG average is used for theD0andDþ
s modes[9] For
theDþ mode there is only one measurement by CLEO III,
so that is used[14] For theΛþ
c we average measurements
by BES III [15] and Belle [16] The expression
BðB → DXμνÞ denotes the average branching fraction
for B0 andB− semileptonic decays.
The B0 and B− semileptonic branching fractions are
obtained with a somewhat different procedure than that
adopted by the PDG, whose actual estimate is difficult
to derive from the posted information We take three
measurements that are mostly model independent and average them The first one was made by CLEO using inclusive leptons at the ϒð4SÞ resonance without distin-guishing whether they are from B0 or B− meson decays [17] The ϒð4SÞ, however, does not have an equal branching fraction intoB0 B0 andB− Bþ mesons In fact
the fraction into neutralB pairs is α ¼ 0.486 0.006[9], with the remainder going into chargedB pairs Therefore,
to compute theB0andB−semileptonic branching fractions
we need to use the following coupled equations
αB0
SLþ ð1 − αÞB−
SL¼ ð10.91 0.09 0.24Þ%;
B0
SL=B−
SL¼ τ0=τ−¼ 0.927 0.004; ð4Þ whereτiare the lifetimes[9] The numbers extracted from
the solution are listed in Table I, along with direct measurements from CLEO [17], BABAR [18], and Belle
[19] These latter two analyses measure the semileptonic decays ofB0andB− mesons separately They do not cover
the full momentum range so a correction has to be applied; this was done by the PDG[9] SinceD0andDþmesons are
produced in bothB0and B− decays, we sum their yields
and use the average semileptonic branching fraction forB0
andB− decays,hB0þ B−i
The semileptonicB branching fractions we use are listed
in TableII Since we are detecting onlyb → cμν modes, we have to correct later for the fact that there is a small 1%
b → uμν component[9] The semileptonic widthsΓSLare equal for allHbspecies used in this analysis except for a small correction for Λ0
b
decays (BSL¼ ΓSL=Γ ¼ ΓSL×τ) This has proven to be true in the case of charm hadron decays even though the lifetimes ofD0andDþdiffer by a factor of 2.5 The decays
of theΛ0
b are slightly different due to the absence of the
chromomagnetic correction that affects B-meson decays but is absent inb baryons[20–22] ThusΓSL, and alsoBSL, are increased for theΛ0
b byð4 2Þ%[12] The input for theB0
s lifetime listed in TableIIuses only
measurements in the flavor-specific decay B0
s→ Dþ
sπ−
from CDF [23] and LHCb [24] Other measurements can in principle be used, e.g., in J=ψϕ or J=ψf0ð980Þ final states, but they then involve also determining ΔΓs Older measurements involving semileptonic decays are
TABLE I Measured semileptonic decay branching fractions for
¯B0andB−mesons The correlation of the errors in the underlying
measurements in the average is taken into account The CLEO
numbers result from solving Eq.(4)
B0
TABLE II Measured semileptonic decay branching fractions forB mesons and derived branching fractions for ¯B0
s andΛ0 based on
the equality of semileptonic widths and the lifetime ratios
¯B0
PRL 118, 052002 (2017)
Trang 3suspected of having larger uncontrolled systematic
uncer-tainties [25] Finally, the Λ0
b lifetime is taken from the
HFAG average [26]
Corrections due to cross feeds among the modes, for
example, from B0
s → DKμ−X events or Λ0
b → DNμ−X decays are well below our sensitivity, and thus we do
not include them
The data used here correspond to integrated luminosities
of 284.10 4.86 pb−1 collected at 7 TeV and 4.60
0.18 pb−1 at 13 TeV [27], where special triggers were
implemented to minimize uncertainties The LHCb detector
[28,29]is a single-arm forward spectrometer covering the
pseudorapidity range 2 < η < 5 Components include a
high-precision tracking system consisting of a silicon-strip
vertex detector surrounding the pp interaction region, a
large-area silicon-strip detector located upstream of a
dipole magnet with a bending power of about 4 Tm, and
three stations of silicon-strip detectors and straw drift tubes
placed downstream of the magnet Different types of
charged hadrons are distinguished using information from
two ring-imaging Cherenkov detectors (RICH) Muons
are identified by a system composed of alternating layers
of iron and multiwire proportional chambers
Events of potential interest are triggered by the
identi-fication of a muon in real time with a minimum pT of
1.48 GeV in the 7 TeV data[30], and 0.9 GeV in the 13 TeV
data (further restricted in the higher level trigger to
pT > 1.3 GeV)[31] In addition, to test for inconsistency
with production at the primary vertex (PV), theχ2
IPfor the muon is computed as the difference between the vertex fit
χ2of the PV reconstructed with and without the considered
track We require thatχ2
IPbe larger than 200 at 7 TeV (16 at
13 TeV), and in the 7 TeV data only, the impact parameter
of the muon must be greater than 0.5 mm There is a
prescale by a factor of 2 for both energies and an additional
prescale of a factor of 2 for the D0μ− channel in the
7 TeV data
These events are subjected to further requirements in
order to select those with a charmed hadron decay which
forms a vertex with the identified muon that is detached
from the PV The charmed hadron must not be consistent
with originating from the PV We use the decays
D0→ K−πþ, Dþ → K−πþπþ, Dþ
s → KþK−πþ, and
Λþ
c → pK−πþ (The related branching fractions are given
in the Supplemental Material [13]) The RICH system is
used to determine a likelihood for each particle hypothesis
We use selections on the differences of log-likelihoods
(L) to separate protons from kaons and pions, LðpÞ −
LðKÞ > 0 and LðpÞ − LðπÞ > 10, kaons from pions
LðKÞ − LðπÞ > 4, and pions from kaons LðKÞ − LðπÞ < 4
for 7 and< 10 for 13 TeV In addition, in order to suppress
background, the averagepT of the charm hadron daughters
must be larger than 700 MeV for three-body and 600 MeV
for two-body decays, and the invariant mass of the charm
hadron plus muon must range from approximately 3 to
5 GeV Furthermore, the charm plus μ vertex must be within a radius less than 4.8 mm from the beam line to remove contributions of secondary interactions in the detector material due to long-lived particles, and the charm hadron must decay downstream of this vertex
Since detection efficiencies vary over the available phase space, we divide the data into two-dimensional intervals in
pT of the charm plusμ system, and η, where the latter is determined from the relative positions of the charm plusμ vertex and the PV We fit the data for each charm plusμ combination in each interval simultaneously in invariant mass of the charm hadron and ln(IP=mm) variables, where
IP is the measured impact parameter of the charmed hadron with respect to the PV in units of mm
As an example of the fitting technique consider Dþ
sμ−
candidates integrated over pT and η for the 7 TeV data Figure1(a)shows the KþK−πþ invariant mass spectrum,
while (b) shows the lnðIP=mmÞ distribution The invariant mass signal is fit for theDþ
s yield with a double-Gaussian
function where the means of the two Gaussians are con-strained to be the same The common mean and the widths are determined in the fit (A second double-Gaussian shape
is used to fit the higher mass decay of Dþ→ πþD0,
D0→ KþK−, an additional consideration only in this
mode.) The lnðIP=mmÞ shape of the signal component, determined by simulation, is a bifurcated Gaussian where the peak position and width parameters are determined by the fit The combinatorial background is modeled with a linear shape (The other modes at both energies are shown
in the Supplemental Material[13].) The signal yields for charm hadron plus muon candidates integrated overη are also given in the Supplemental Material[13]
The major components of the total efficiency are the off-line and trigger efficiencies The latter is measured with respect to the off-line, which has several components from tracking, particle identification, event selection, and overall event size cuts These have been evaluated in a data-driven manner whenever possible Only the event selection effi-ciencies have been simulated Samples of simulated events, produced with the software described in Refs.[32–34], are used to characterize signal and background contributions The particle identification efficiencies are determined from calibration samples ofDþ→ πþD0,D0→ K−πþ decays
for kaons and pions, andΛ → pπ−for protons The trigger
efficiencies including the muon identification efficiency are determined using samples of b → J=ψX, J=ψ → μþμ−
decays, where one muon is identified and the other used
to measure the efficiencies For the overall sample they are typically 20% for the 7 TeV data and 70% for the 13 TeV data, only weakly dependent onη The difference is caused primarily by the impact parameter cut on the muon of 0.5 mm in the 7 TeV data The efficiency for the overall event size requirement is determined usingB− → J=ψK−
decays where much looser criteria were applied These efficiencies are all above 95% and are determined with PRL 118, 052002 (2017)
Trang 4negligible uncertainties The total efficiencies given as a
function of η and pT for both energies are shown in the
Supplemental Material [13]
There is dwindling efficiency toward smallpT values of
the charmed hadron plus muon Data in the regions with
negligible efficiency are excluded, and a correction is made
using simulation to calculate the fraction of events that fall
within inefficient regions These numbers are calculated for
each bin of η for 7 and 13 TeV data separately, and the
averages are 38% at 7 TeV and 46% at 13 TeV The pT
distributions from simulation in each η bin have been
checked and found to agree within error with those
observed in the data in bins with sufficient statistics
The signal yields are obtained from fits that subtract the
uncorrelated backgrounds There are, however, two
back-ground sources that must be dealt with separately One
results from real charm hadron decays that form a vertex
with a charged track that is misidentified as a muon and the
other is fromb decays into two charmed hadrons where one
decays either leptonically or semileptonically into a muon
In most cases the requirement that the muon forms a vertex
with the charmed hadron eliminates this background, but
some remains The background from fake muons combined
with a real charmed hadron, and a real muon combined with
a charm hadron from another b decay as estimated from
wrong-sign muon and hadron combinations is 0.7% at
7 TeV and 2.0% at 13 TeV The fake rates caused by b
decays to two charmed hadrons where one decays
semi-leptonically have been evaluated from simulation and are
about 2% when averaged over all charmed species
The inclusiveb-hadron cross sections as functions of η are given in Fig 2, along with a theoretical prediction called FONLL[35] These results are consistent with and super-sede our previous results at 7 TeV[4] The ratio of cross sections is predicted with less uncertainty, and indeed most
of the experimental uncertainties (discussed below) also cancel, with the largest exception being the luminosity error
In Fig.2(c), we compare theη-dependent cross-section ratio for 13 TeV divided by 7 TeV with the FONLL prediction
We see higher ratios at lower values ofη than given by the prediction, which indicates that the cross section atη values near 2 is growing faster than at larger values
The results as a function of η are listed in Table III The total cross sections at 7 and 13 TeV integrated over
2 < η < 5 are 72.0 0.3 6.8 and 154.3 1.5 14.3 μb for 7 and 13 TeV The ratio is 2.14 0.02 0.13 This agrees with the theoretical prediction at 7 TeV of62þ28
−22 μb, and is a bit larger than the 13 TeV prediction of111þ51
−44 μb While the measured ratio is consistent with the prediction
of1.79þ0.21
−0.15, it disagrees with the combination of shape and
normalization
Systematic uncertainties are considerably larger than the statistical errors The ones that are independent of η are listed in TableIV The luminosity and muon trigger efficiency uncertainties in the ratio are each obtained by assuming a−50% correlated error[36] The uncertainty in the tracking efficiency is given by taking 0.5% per muon track and 1.5% per hadron track [37] The various final states used to simulate the efficiencies can contribute to an overall efficiency change This is estimated by taking the
[MeV]
)
π
m(KK
1900 1950 2000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
3500
LHCb 7 TeV (a)
/mm)
IP
ln(
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
10000 LHCb 7 TeV (b)
[MeV]
)
π
m(KK
1900 1950 2000
1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
LHCb 7 TeV (c)
/mm)
IP
ln(
1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10 LHCb 7 TeV (d)
FIG 1 Fits to theKþK−πþinvariant mass (a) and lnðIP=mmÞ (b) distributions for data taken at 7 TeV data integrated over 2 < η < 5 The data are shown as solid circles (black), and the overall fits as solid lines (blue) The dot-dashed (green) curve shows theDþ
s signal
fromb decay, while the dashed (purple) curve Dþ
s from prompt production The dotted curve (orange) shows theDþcomponent The
dashed line (red) shows the combinatorial background The same fits using a logarithmic scale are shown in (c) and (d)
PRL 118, 052002 (2017)
Trang 5difference between the efficiencies of the higher
multi-plicityDμ−ν states and Dμ−ν states, where Drefers to
excited states that decay into a charmed particle and pions,
and taking into account the uncertainties on the measured
branching fractions These are then added in quadrature
and referred to as the b decay cocktail in Table IV
The fraction of higher massb-baryon states with respect
to theΛ0
b is given byδ ¼ 0.25 0.10, which represents a
40% relative uncertainty that affects only the baryon
contribution to Eq (3)
There are also η-dependent systematic uncertainties in
the cross section that arise from the trigger efficiency,
the event selection, the hadron identification, and the
corrections for the low pT region with low efficiencies
When added in quadrature with the η-independent
uncer-tainties, the total errors range from (8.5–11.0)% at 7 TeV to
(8.7–-9.7)% at 13 TeV There is some cancellation in the ratio giving a range of (5.6–7.3)%
In conclusion, new results for the bb production cross section at 7 TeV are in good agreement with the original η-dependent cross-section measurement previously reported
[4], and are in agreement with the theoretical prediction (FONLL)[35] The 13 TeV results are somewhat higher in magnitude than the theory, and generally agree with the shape and magnitude measured using inclusiveb → J=ψX decays [36] The cross-section ratio of 13 to 7 TeV as a function ofη differs from the FONLL model by 5 standard deviations, including the systematic uncertainties This discrepancy is mainly the difference in the low η bins
To get an idea of the cross section in the fullη range we use
η
X)/b
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
(a) FONLL Data
LHCb 7 TeV
η
X)/b
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
(b) FONLL Data
LHCb 13 TeV
η
X)/b
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
4
(c) FONLL Data
7 TeV
13 TeV LHCb
5
FIG 2 The differential cross section as a function ofη for σðpp → HbXÞ, where Hbis a hadron that contains either ab or a ¯b quark, but not both, at center-of-mass energies of 7 TeV (a) and 13 TeV (b) The ratio is shown in (c) The smaller error bars (black) show the statistical uncertainties only, and the larger ones (blue) have the systematic uncertainties added in quadrature The solid line (red) gives the theoretical prediction, while the solid shaded band gives the estimated uncertainty on the predictions at1σ, the cross-hatched at
2σ, and the dashes at 3σ
TABLE III pp → HbX differential cross sections as a function
of η for 7 and 13 TeV collisions and their ratio The first
uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic To get the
cross section in each interval divide by a factor of 2
TABLE IV Systematic uncertainties independent ofη on the
pp → HbX cross sections at 7 and 13 TeV and their ratio
PRL 118, 052002 (2017)
Trang 6multiplicative factors derived from Pythia 8 simulations of
4.1 at 7 TeV and 3.9 at 13 TeV[33,34]and extrapolate the
totalbb cross sections as ≈ 295 μb at 7 TeV and ≈ 600 μb
at 13 TeV
We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN
accelerator departments for the excellent performance of the
LHC We thank the technical and administrative staff at the
LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and
from the national agencies: CAPES, CNPq, FAPERJ and
FINEP (Brazil); NSFC (China); CNRS/IN2P3 (France);
BMBF, DFG and MPG (Germany); INFN (Italy); FOM
and NWO (Netherlands); MNiSW and NCN (Poland);
MEN/IFA (Romania); MinES and FASO (Russia);
MinECo (Spain); SNSF and SER (Switzerland); NASU
(Ukraine); STFC (United Kingdom); NSF (USA) We
acknowledge the computing resources that are provided
by CERN, IN2P3 (France), KIT and DESY (Germany),
INFN (Italy), SURF (Netherlands), PIC (Spain), GridPP
(United Kingdom), RRCKI and Yandex LLC (Russia),
CSCS (Switzerland), IFIN-HH (Romania), CBPF (Brazil),
PL-GRID (Poland) and OSC (USA) We are indebted to the
communities behind the multiple open source software
packages on which we depend Individual groups or
members have received support from AvH Foundation
(Germany), EPLANET, Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
and ERC (European Union), Conseil Général de
Haute-Savoie, Labex ENIGMASS and OCEVU, Région Auvergne
(France), RFBR and Yandex LLC (Russia), GVA, XuntaGal
and GENCAT (Spain), Herchel Smith Fund, The Royal
Society, Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851 and
the Leverhulme Trust (United Kingdom)
[1] M Cacciari, S Frixione, N Houdeau, M L Mangano, P
Nason, and G Ridolfi, Theoretical predictions for charm
and bottom production at the LHC,J High Energy Phys 10
(2012) 137;B A Kniehl, G Kramer, I Schienbein, and H
Spiesberger, Inclusive B-meson production at the LHC in
the GM-VFN scheme,Phys Rev D 84, 094026 (2011)
[2] E Halkiadakis, G Redlinger, and D Shih, Status and
implications of beyond-the-standard-model searches at the
LHC,Annu Rev Nucl Part Sci 64, 319 (2014)
[3] R Aaij et al (LHCb Collaboration), Implications of LHCb
measurements and future prospects,Eur Phys J C 73, 2373
(2013)
[4] R Aaij et al (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of
σðpp → bbXÞ atpffiffiffis¼ 7 TeV in the forward region,Phys
Lett B 694, 209 (2010)
[5] R Aaij et al (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement ofJ=ψ
production inpp collisions atpffiffiffis¼ 7 TeV,Eur Phys J C
71, 1645 (2011)
[6] B Abbott et al (D0 Collaboration), The bb production
cross section and angular correlations inffiffiffi pp collisions at
s
p
¼ 1.8 TeV,Phys Lett B 487, 264 (2000); T Aaltonen
et al (CDF Collaboration), Measurement of theb-hadron
production cross section using decays to μ − D0X final states inpp collisions atpffiffiffis¼ 1.96 TeV,Phys Rev D 79,
092003 (2009); T Aaltonen et al (CDF Collaboration), Measurement of correlatedbb production in p−p collisions
at ffiffiffi s
p
¼ 1960 GeV,Phys Rev D 77, 072004 (2008) [7] S Chatrchyan et al (CMS Collaboration), Measurement of the strangeB meson production cross section with J=ψϕ decays inpp collisions atpffiffiffis¼ 7 TeV,Phys Rev D 84,
052008 (2011); R Aaij et al (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the B production cross-section in pp collisions atpffiffiffis¼ 7 TeV,
J High Energy Phys 04 (2012) 093; S Chatrchyan et al (CMS Collaboration), Measure-ment of the cross section for production ofbbX, decaying
to muons inpp collisions atpffiffiffis¼ 7 TeV,J High Energy Phys 06 (2012) 110;S Chatrchyan et al (CMS Collabo-ration), Measurement of theΛ0 cross section and theΛ0to
Λ0ratio withJ=ψΛ decays in pp collisions atpffiffiffis¼ 7 TeV, Phys Lett B 714, 136 (2012); B Abelev et al (ALICE Collaboration), Measurement of prompt J=ψ and beauty hadron production cross sections at mid-rapidity in pp collisions atpffiffiffis¼ 7 TeV,
J High Energy Phys 11 (2012) 065; G Aad et al (ATLAS Collaboration), Measurement
of the b-hadron production cross section using decays to
Dμ−X final states in pp collisions atpffiffiffis¼ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Nucl Phys B864, 341 (2012); G Aad
et al (ATLAS Collaboration), Measurement of the differ-ential cross-section of Bþ meson production in pp colli-sions at ffiffiffi
s
p
¼ 7 TeV at ATLAS,J High Energy Phys 10 (2013) 042;R Aaij et al (LHCb Collaboration), Measure-ment of B meson production cross-sections in proton-proton collisions at pffiffiffis¼ 7 TeV,
J High Energy Phys
08 (2013) 117
[8] V Khachatryan et al (CMS Collaboration), Measurement
of the total and differential inclusive Bþ hadron cross
sections in pp collisions at pffiffiffis¼ 13 TeV, arXiv: 1609.00873 [Phys Lett B (to be published)]
[9] K A Olive et al (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics,Chin Phys C 38, 090001 (2014), and 2015 online update
[10] R Aaij et al (LHCb Collaboration), Precision Measurement
of CP Violation in B0s → J=ψKþK− Decays, Phys Rev.
Lett 114, 041801 (2015) [11] M B Voloshin, Remarks on measurement of the decay
Ξ−
b → Λ0π−,arXiv:1510.05568.
[12] R Aaij et al (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of b-hadron production fractions in 7 TeV pp collisions, Phys Rev D 85, 032008 (2012)
[13] See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/ supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.052002for the de-cay modes and charm hadronic branching fractions used in this analysis; The signal yields in the different b decay modes, fits to the different invariant mass spectra and ln (IP=mm) distributions for charm hadron plus muon events, and efficiencies for differentη and pT intervals.
[14] G Bonvicini et al (CLEO Collaboration), Updated measurements of absoluteDþand D0 hadronic branching
fractions and σðeþe−→ DDÞ at Ecm¼ 3774 MeV, Phys Rev D 89, 072002 (2014); Erratum, Phys Rev D 91,
019903 (2015)
PRL 118, 052002 (2017)
Trang 7[15] M Ablikim et al (BESIII Collaboration), Measurements
of Absolute Hadronic Branching Fractions ofΛþ
c Baryon,
Phys Rev Lett 116, 052001 (2016)
[16] A Zupanc et al (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of the
Branching FractionBðΛþc → pK−πþÞ,Phys Rev Lett 113,
042002 (2014)
[17] A H Mahmood et al (CLEO Collaboration), Measurement
of the B-meson inclusive semileptonic branching fraction
and electron energy moments, Phys Rev D 70, 032003
(2004)
[18] B Aubert et al (BABAR Collaboration), Measurement of
the ratio BðBþ→ XeνÞ=BðB0→ XeνÞ, Phys Rev D 74,
091105 (2006)
[19] P Urquijo et al (Belle Collaboration), Moments of the
electron energy spectrum and partial branching fraction
ofB → XðcÞeν decays at Belle,Phys Rev D 75, 032001
(2007)
[20] A V Manohar and M B Wise, Inclusive semileptonic B
and polarizedΛ0decays from QCD,Phys Rev D 49, 1310
(1994)
[21] I I Bigi, M A Shifman, N G Uraltsev, and A I
Vainshtein, QCD Predictions for Lepton Spectra in
Inclusive Heavy Flavor Decays, Phys Rev Lett 71, 496
(1993)
[22] I I Bigi, T Mannel, and N Uraltsev, Semileptonic width
ratios among beauty hadrons, J High Energy Phys 09
(2011) 012
[23] T Aaltonen et al (CDF Collaboration), Measurement of the
Bs Lifetime in Fully and Partially Reconstructed Bs→
D−
sðϕπ−ÞX Decays in p − p Collisions atpffiffiffis¼ 1.96 TeV,
Phys Rev Lett 107, 272001 (2011)
[24] R Aaij et al (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of theB0
s
Meson Lifetime in Dþ
sπ− Decays, Phys Rev Lett 113,
172001 (2014)
[25] S Stone, Lifetimes of some b-flavored hadrons, in 12th
Conference on Flavor Physics and CP Violation (FPCP
2014) Marseille, France, May 26-30, 2014, 2014, arXiv:
1406.6497
[26] Y Amhis et al (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group), Averages
ofb-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of summer
2014 and online update at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/
xorg/hfag, arXiv:1412.7515, updated results and plots available at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/ [27] R Aaij et al (LHCb Collaboration), Precision luminosity measurements at LHCb,J Instrum 9, P12005 (2014) [28] A A Alves Jr et al (LHCb Collaboration), The LHCb detector at the LHC, J Instrum 3, S08005 (2008) [29] R Aaij et al (LHCb Collaboration), LHCb detector performance,Int J Mod Phys A 30, 1530022 (2015) [30] R Aaij et al., The LHCb trigger and its performance in
2011,J Instrum 8, P04022 (2013) [31] R Aaij et al., Tesla: An application for real-time data analysis in high energy physics,Comput Phys Commun
208, 35 (2016) [32] T Sjostrand, S Mrenna, and P Z Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual,J High Energy Phys 05 (2006) 026 [33] T Sjöstrand, S Mrenna, and P Skands, A brief introduction
to PYTHIA 8.1,Comput Phys Commun 178, 852 (2008) [34] I Belyaev et al., Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss, the LHCb simulation framework,J Phys Conf Ser 331, 032047 (2011); D J Lange, The EvtGen particle decay simulation package,Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res., Sect A 462, 152 (2001); P Golonka and Z Was, PHOTOS Monte Carlo: A precision tool for QED correc-tions in Z and W decays,Eur Phys J C 45, 97 (2006);
J Allison et al., Geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 53, 270 (2006); S Agostinelli et al (GEANT4 Collaboration), GEANT4: A simulation toolkit, Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res., Sect A 506, 250 (2003); M Clemencic et al (LHCb Collaboration), The LHCb simulation application, Gauss: Design, evolution and experience, J Phys Conf Ser 331, 032023 (2011) [35] M Cacciari, M L Mangano, and P Nason, Gluon PDF constraints from the ratio of forward heavy-quark production at the LHC atpffiffiffis¼ 7 and 13 TeV,
Eur Phys J
C 75, 610 (2015) [36] R Aaij et al (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of forwardffiffiffi J=ψ production cross-sections in pp collisions at s
p ¼ 13 TeV,
J High Energy Phys 10 (2015) 172 [37] R Aaij et al (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the track reconstruction efficiency at LHCb, J Instrum 10, P02007 (2015)
R Aaij,40B Adeva,39 M Adinolfi,48 Z Ajaltouni,5 S Akar,6 J Albrecht,10F Alessio,40M Alexander,53S Ali,43
G Alkhazov,31P Alvarez Cartelle,55A A Alves Jr.,59S Amato,2 S Amerio,23Y Amhis,7 L An,41L Anderlini,18
G Andreassi,41M Andreotti,17,g J E Andrews,60R B Appleby,56F Archilli,43P d’Argent,12
J Arnau Romeu,6
A Artamonov,37M Artuso,61E Aslanides,6G Auriemma,26M Baalouch,5I Babuschkin,56S Bachmann,12J J Back,50
A Badalov,38C Baesso,62S Baker,55W Baldini,17R J Barlow,56C Barschel,40S Barsuk,7W Barter,40M Baszczyk,27
V Batozskaya,29B Batsukh,61V Battista,41A Bay,41L Beaucourt,4J Beddow,53F Bedeschi,24I Bediaga,1L J Bel,43
V Bellee,41 N Belloli,21,iK Belous,37I Belyaev,32E Ben-Haim,8 G Bencivenni,19 S Benson,43J Benton,48
A Berezhnoy,33R Bernet,42A Bertolin,23F Betti,15M.-O Bettler,40M van Beuzekom,43Ia Bezshyiko,42S Bifani,47
P Billoir,8T Bird,56A Birnkraut,10A Bitadze,56A Bizzeti,18,uT Blake,50F Blanc,41J Blouw,11,†S Blusk,61V Bocci,26
T Boettcher,58A Bondar,36,wN Bondar,31,40W Bonivento,16A Borgheresi,21,iS Borghi,56M Borisyak,35M Borsato,39
F Bossu,7M Boubdir,9T J V Bowcock,54E Bowen,42C Bozzi,17,40S Braun,12M Britsch,12T Britton,61J Brodzicka,56
E Buchanan,48C Burr,56A Bursche,2J Buytaert,40S Cadeddu,16R Calabrese,17,gM Calvi,21,iM Calvo Gomez,38,m PRL 118, 052002 (2017)
Trang 8A Camboni,38P Campana,19D Campora Perez,40D H Campora Perez,40L Capriotti,56A Carbone,15,eG Carboni,25,j
R Cardinale,20,hA Cardini,16P Carniti,21,iL Carson,52K Carvalho Akiba,2G Casse,54L Cassina,21,iL Castillo Garcia,41
M Cattaneo,40Ch Cauet,10G Cavallero,20R Cenci,24,tM Charles,8Ph Charpentier,40G Chatzikonstantinidis,47
M Chefdeville,4 S Chen,56S.-F Cheung,57V Chobanova,39 M Chrzaszcz,42,27X Cid Vidal,39G Ciezarek,43
P E L Clarke,52M Clemencic,40H V Cliff,49J Closier,40V Coco,59J Cogan,6 E Cogneras,5 V Cogoni,16,40,f
L Cojocariu,30G Collazuol,23,oP Collins,40A Comerma-Montells,12A Contu,40A Cook,48G Coombs,40
S Coquereau,38G Corti,40M Corvo,17,gC M Costa Sobral,50B Couturier,40G A Cowan,52D C Craik,52
A Crocombe,50M Cruz Torres,62S Cunliffe,55R Currie,55C D’Ambrosio,40
F Da Cunha Marinho,2E Dall’Occo,43
J Dalseno,48 P N Y David,43A Davis,59O De Aguiar Francisco,2 K De Bruyn,6S De Capua,56M De Cian,12
J M De Miranda,1 L De Paula,2 M De Serio,14,dP De Simone,19C.-T Dean,53D Decamp,4 M Deckenhoff,10
L Del Buono,8 M Demmer,10D Derkach,35O Deschamps,5 F Dettori,40B Dey,22 A Di Canto,40H Dijkstra,40
F Dordei,40M Dorigo,41A Dosil Suárez,39A Dovbnya,45K Dreimanis,54L Dufour,43G Dujany,56K Dungs,40
P Durante,40R Dzhelyadin,37A Dziurda,40A Dzyuba,31N Déléage,4S Easo,51M Ebert,52U Egede,55V Egorychev,32
S Eidelman,36,w S Eisenhardt,52U Eitschberger,10R Ekelhof,10L Eklund,53Ch Elsasser,42 S Ely,61S Esen,12
H M Evans,49T Evans,57A Falabella,15N Farley,47S Farry,54 R Fay,54D Fazzini,21,iD Ferguson,52
V Fernandez Albor,39A Fernandez Prieto,39 F Ferrari,15,40 F Ferreira Rodrigues,1 M Ferro-Luzzi,40S Filippov,34
R A Fini,14M Fiore,17,gM Fiorini,17,gM Firlej,28C Fitzpatrick,41T Fiutowski,28F Fleuret,7,bK Fohl,40M Fontana,16,40
F Fontanelli,20,hD C Forshaw,61R Forty,40V Franco Lima,54M Frank,40C Frei,40J Fu,22,qE Furfaro,25,jC Färber,40
A Gallas Torreira,39D Galli,15,eS Gallorini,23 S Gambetta,52M Gandelman,2 P Gandini,57Y Gao,3
L M Garcia Martin,68J García Pardiñas,39J Garra Tico,49L Garrido,38P J Garsed,49D Gascon,38C Gaspar,40
L Gavardi,10G Gazzoni,5D Gerick,12E Gersabeck,12M Gersabeck,56T Gershon,50Ph Ghez,4S Gianì,41V Gibson,49
O G Girard,41L Giubega,30K Gizdov,52V V Gligorov,8D Golubkov,32A Golutvin,55,40A Gomes,1,aI V Gorelov,33
C Gotti,21,iM Grabalosa Gándara,5 R Graciani Diaz,38 L A Granado Cardoso,40E Graugés,38E Graverini,42
G Graziani,18A Grecu,30P Griffith,47L Grillo,21,40,iB R Gruberg Cazon,57O Grünberg,66E Gushchin,34Yu Guz,37
T Gys,40C Göbel,62T Hadavizadeh,57C Hadjivasiliou,5G Haefeli,41C Haen,40S C Haines,49S Hall,55B Hamilton,60
X Han,12S Hansmann-Menzemer,12 N Harnew,57S T Harnew,48J Harrison,56M Hatch,40J He,63T Head,41
A Heister,9K Hennessy,54P Henrard,5L Henry,8J A Hernando Morata,39E van Herwijnen,40M Heß,66A Hicheur,2
D Hill,57C Hombach,56H Hopchev,41W Hulsbergen,43T Humair,55M Hushchyn,35N Hussain,57D Hutchcroft,54
M Idzik,28P Ilten,58R Jacobsson,40A Jaeger,12J Jalocha,57E Jans,43A Jawahery,60F Jiang,3M John,57D Johnson,40
C R Jones,49C Joram,40B Jost,40N Jurik,61S Kandybei,45W Kanso,6M Karacson,40J M Kariuki,48S Karodia,53
M Kecke,12M Kelsey,61I R Kenyon,47M Kenzie,49T Ketel,44E Khairullin,35B Khanji,21,40,iC Khurewathanakul,41
T Kirn,9 S Klaver,56K Klimaszewski,29S Koliiev,46M Kolpin,12I Komarov,41R F Koopman,44P Koppenburg,43
A Kosmyntseva,32A Kozachuk,33M Kozeiha,5 L Kravchuk,34K Kreplin,12M Kreps,50P Krokovny,36,w F Kruse,10
W Krzemien,29W Kucewicz,27,lM Kucharczyk,27V Kudryavtsev,36,wA K Kuonen,41K Kurek,29T Kvaratskheliya,32,40
D Lacarrere,40G Lafferty,56A Lai,16D Lambert,52 G Lanfranchi,19C Langenbruch,9 T Latham,50C Lazzeroni,47
R Le Gac,6 J van Leerdam,43J.-P Lees,4 A Leflat,33,40J Lefrançois,7 R Lefèvre,5 F Lemaitre,40E Lemos Cid,39
O Leroy,6T Lesiak,27B Leverington,12Y Li,7 T Likhomanenko,35,67 R Lindner,40C Linn,40 F Lionetto,42B Liu,16
X Liu,3D Loh,50I Longstaff,53J H Lopes,2D Lucchesi,23,oM Lucio Martinez,39H Luo,52A Lupato,23E Luppi,17,g
O Lupton,57 A Lusiani,24X Lyu,63F Machefert,7 F Maciuc,30O Maev,31K Maguire,56S Malde,57A Malinin,67
T Maltsev,36G Manca,7 G Mancinelli,6 P Manning,61J Maratas,5,vJ F Marchand,4 U Marconi,15C Marin Benito,38
P Marino,24,tJ Marks,12G Martellotti,26M Martin,6 M Martinelli,41 D Martinez Santos,39 F Martinez Vidal,68
D Martins Tostes,2L M Massacrier,7A Massafferri,1R Matev,40A Mathad,50Z Mathe,40C Matteuzzi,21A Mauri,42
B Maurin,41A Mazurov,47M McCann,55J McCarthy,47A McNab,56R McNulty,13B Meadows,59F Meier,10
M Meissner,12D Melnychuk,29M Merk,43A Merli,22,qE Michielin,23D A Milanes,65M.-N Minard,4D S Mitzel,12
A Mogini,8 J Molina Rodriguez,62I A Monroy,65S Monteil,5 M Morandin,23 P Morawski,28A Mordà,6
M J Morello,24,tJ Moron,28A B Morris,52R Mountain,61F Muheim,52M Mulder,43M Mussini,15 D Müller,56
J Müller,10K Müller,42V Müller,10P Naik,48T Nakada,41R Nandakumar,51A Nandi,57I Nasteva,2 M Needham,52
N Neri,22S Neubert,12N Neufeld,40M Neuner,12A D Nguyen,41C Nguyen-Mau,41,nS Nieswand,9 R Niet,10
N Nikitin,33T Nikodem,12A Novoselov,37D P O’Hanlon,50
A Oblakowska-Mucha,28V Obraztsov,37S Ogilvy,19 PRL 118, 052002 (2017)
Trang 9R Oldeman,49C J G Onderwater,69J M Otalora Goicochea,2 A Otto,40P Owen,42 A Oyanguren,68P R Pais,41
A Palano,14,dF Palombo,22,q M Palutan,19 J Panman,40A Papanestis,51M Pappagallo,14,dL L Pappalardo,17,g
W Parker,60C Parkes,56G Passaleva,18 A Pastore,14,d G D Patel,54M Patel,55C Patrignani,15,e A Pearce,56,51
A Pellegrino,43G Penso,26M Pepe Altarelli,40S Perazzini,40P Perret,5 L Pescatore,47K Petridis,48 A Petrolini,20,h
A Petrov,67 M Petruzzo,22,qE Picatoste Olloqui,38B Pietrzyk,4 M Pikies,27D Pinci,26A Pistone,20A Piucci,12
S Playfer,52M Plo Casasus,39T Poikela,40F Polci,8 A Poluektov,50,36 I Polyakov,61E Polycarpo,2 G J Pomery,48
A Popov,37D Popov,11,40B Popovici,30 S Poslavskii,37C Potterat,2 E Price,48J D Price,54J Prisciandaro,39
A Pritchard,54 C Prouve,48 V Pugatch,46A Puig Navarro,41G Punzi,24,pW Qian,57R Quagliani,7,48B Rachwal,27
J H Rademacker,48M Rama,24 M Ramos Pernas,39M S Rangel,2I Raniuk,45G Raven,44 F Redi,55S Reichert,10
A C dos Reis,1C Remon Alepuz,68V Renaudin,7S Ricciardi,51S Richards,48M Rihl,40K Rinnert,54V Rives Molina,38
P Robbe,7,40A B Rodrigues,1 E Rodrigues,59J A Rodriguez Lopez,65 P Rodriguez Perez,56,† A Rogozhnikov,35
S Roiser,40A Rollings,57V Romanovskiy,37A Romero Vidal,39J W Ronayne,13M Rotondo,19M S Rudolph,61
T Ruf,40P Ruiz Valls,68J J Saborido Silva,39 E Sadykhov,32N Sagidova,31 B Saitta,16,f V Salustino Guimaraes,2
C Sanchez Mayordomo,68B Sanmartin Sedes,39R Santacesaria,26 C Santamarina Rios,39M Santimaria,19
E Santovetti,25,jA Sarti,19,kC Satriano,26,sA Satta,25D M Saunders,48D Savrina,32,33S Schael,9 M Schellenberg,10
M Schiller,40H Schindler,40M Schlupp,10M Schmelling,11T Schmelzer,10B Schmidt,40O Schneider,41A Schopper,40
K Schubert,10M Schubiger,41M.-H Schune,7 R Schwemmer,40B Sciascia,19A Sciubba,26,k A Semennikov,32
A Sergi,47N Serra,42J Serrano,6L Sestini,23P Seyfert,21M Shapkin,37I Shapoval,45Y Shcheglov,31T Shears,54
L Shekhtman,36,w V Shevchenko,67A Shires,10B G Siddi,17,40R Silva Coutinho,42L Silva de Oliveira,2 G Simi,23,o
S Simone,14,dM Sirendi,49N Skidmore,48T Skwarnicki,61E Smith,55I T Smith,52J Smith,49M Smith,55H Snoek,43
M D Sokoloff,59F J P Soler,53B Souza De Paula,2 B Spaan,10P Spradlin,53 S Sridharan,40F Stagni,40M Stahl,12
S Stahl,40P Stefko,41S Stefkova,55O Steinkamp,42S Stemmle,12O Stenyakin,37S Stevenson,57S Stoica,30S Stone,61
B Storaci,42S Stracka,24,p M Straticiuc,30U Straumann,42 L Sun,59W Sutcliffe,55K Swientek,28 V Syropoulos,44
M Szczekowski,29T Szumlak,28S T’Jampens,4
A Tayduganov,6 T Tekampe,10M Teklishyn,7 G Tellarini,17,g
F Teubert,40E Thomas,40J van Tilburg,43M J Tilley,55V Tisserand,4 M Tobin,41S Tolk,49L Tomassetti,17,g
D Tonelli,40S Topp-Joergensen,57F Toriello,61E Tournefier,4 S Tourneur,41 K Trabelsi,41 M Traill,53M T Tran,41
M Tresch,42A Trisovic,40A Tsaregorodtsev,6 P Tsopelas,43A Tully,49N Tuning,43A Ukleja,29 A Ustyuzhanin,35
U Uwer,12C Vacca,16,f V Vagnoni,15,40A Valassi,40S Valat,40G Valenti,15A Vallier,7R Vazquez Gomez,19
P Vazquez Regueiro,39S Vecchi,17M van Veghel,43J J Velthuis,48M Veltri,18,rG Veneziano,41A Venkateswaran,61
M Vernet,5M Vesterinen,12B Viaud,7D Vieira,1M Vieites Diaz,39X Vilasis-Cardona,38,mV Volkov,33A Vollhardt,42
B Voneki,40A Vorobyev,31V Vorobyev,36,w C Voß,66J A de Vries,43C Vázquez Sierra,39R Waldi,66C Wallace,50
R Wallace,13J Walsh,24J Wang,61D R Ward,49H M Wark,54 N K Watson,47D Websdale,55A Weiden,42
M Whitehead,40J Wicht,50G Wilkinson,57,40M Wilkinson,61M Williams,40M P Williams,47M Williams,58
T Williams,47 F F Wilson,51 J Wimberley,60J Wishahi,10W Wislicki,29 M Witek,27G Wormser,7 S A Wotton,49
K Wraight,53S Wright,49K Wyllie,40Y Xie,64Z Xing,61Z Xu,41 Z Yang,3 H Yin,64J Yu,64X Yuan,36,w
O Yushchenko,37K A Zarebski,47 M Zavertyaev,11,c L Zhang,3 Y Zhang,7 Y Zhang,63 A Zhelezov,12Y Zheng,63
A Zhokhov,32 X Zhu,3 V Zhukov,9and S Zucchelli15
(LHCb Collaboration)
1
Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
3
Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
4LAPP, Université Savoie Mont-Blanc, CNRS/IN2P3, Annecy-Le-Vieux, France
5
Clermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France
6CPPM, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, Marseille, France
7
LAL, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay, France
8
LPNHE, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Université Paris Diderot, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
9
I Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
10
Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
PRL 118, 052002 (2017)
Trang 1011Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK), Heidelberg, Germany
12
Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
13School of Physics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
14
Sezione INFN di Bari, Bari, Italy
15Sezione INFN di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
16
Sezione INFN di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
17Sezione INFN di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
18
Sezione INFN di Firenze, Firenze, Italy
19Laboratori Nazionali dell’INFN di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
20
Sezione INFN di Genova, Genova, Italy
21Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy
22
Sezione INFN di Milano, Milano, Italy
23Sezione INFN di Padova, Padova, Italy
24
Sezione INFN di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
25Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
26
Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
27Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
28
AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland
29National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Warsaw, Poland
30
Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
31Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI), Gatchina, Russia
32
Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP), Moscow, Russia
33Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University (SINP MSU), Moscow, Russia
34
Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN), Moscow, Russia
35Yandex School of Data Analysis, Moscow, Russia
36
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS), Novosibirsk, Russia
37Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP), Protvino, Russia
38
ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
39Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
40
European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
41Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
42
Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
43Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
44
Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
45NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT), Kharkiv, Ukraine
46
Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR), Kyiv, Ukraine
47University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
48
H.H Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
49Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
50
Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
51STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom
52
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
53School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
54
Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
55Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
56
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
57Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
58
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
59University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
60
University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
61Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
62
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, associated to Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
63
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, associated to Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
64
Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, associated to Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
65
Departamento de Fisica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia, associated to LPNHE, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Université Paris Diderot, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
PRL 118, 052002 (2017)