Magnetocaloric Effect in Fe-Ni-Zr Alloys Preparedby Using the Rapidly-quenched Method Nguyen Huy Dan,∗ Nguyen Huu Duc, Tran Dang Thanh, Nguyen Hai Yen and Pham Thi Thanh Institute of Mate
Trang 1Magnetocaloric Effect in Fe-Ni-Zr Alloys Prepared
by Using the Rapidly-quenched Method
Nguyen Huy Dan,∗ Nguyen Huu Duc, Tran Dang Thanh, Nguyen Hai Yen and Pham Thi Thanh Institute of Materials Science, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Hanoi, Vietnam
Ngac An Bang and Do Thi Kim Anh
Hanoi University of Science, 334 Nguyen Trai, Hanoi, Vietnam
The-Long Phan and Seong-Cho Yu† Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 361 - 763, South Korea
(Received 31 May 2012, in final form 21 July 2012)
Fe90−xNixZr10 (x = 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25) ribbons with various thicknesses were prepared by
using a melt-spinning technique The Curie temperature, T C, of the alloys dramatically decreased
from∼960 K to room temperature at high quenching rates When the alloys had an amorphous
structure, their T C strongly depended on the Ni concentration The maximum entropy change,
|∆S m | max , with ∆H = 12 kOe, of the alloys was around 1 J·kg −1K−1 at room temperature On
the other hand, the full width at half maximum the entropy-change peak was quite large,∼ 85 K,
which was suitable for applications in magnetic refrigerators at room temperature
PACS numbers: 75.30.Sg, 07.20.Mc, 75.50.Kj
Keywords: Magnetocaloric effect, Refrigeration, Amorphous magnetic materials
DOI: 10.3938/jkps.62.1715
I INTRODUCTION
The giant magnetocaloric effect (GMCE) in materials
is of interest in research virtue of its potential
applica-tions in the field of magnetic refrigeration Magnetic
re-frigeration is based on the principle of magnetic entropy
change in materials under a varying magnetic field The
application of magnetocaloric materials in refrigerators
has the advantages of avoiding environmental pollution
(unlike the refrigerators using compressed gases),
im-proving the cooling efficiency (saving energy), reducing
noise, and fitting some special cases The main problems
to be addressed to improve the practical applications of
magnetocaloric materials are: i) creating the GMCE in a
low field, because creating a large magnetic field in civil
devices is very difficult, ii) taking the magnetic phase
transition temperature (working temperature) of
mate-rials with the GMCE to room temperature, and iii)
ex-tending the working temperature range (range with the
GMCE) for materials to be cooled to a large temperature
range In addition, some other properties of materials,
such as the heat capacity, electrical conductivity,
ther-mal conductivity, durability, price,etc., also need to be
∗E-mail: dannh@ims.vast.ac.vn
†E-mail: scyu@chungbuk.ac.kr
addressed for the application of GMCE materials Along with the goal of saving energy and protecting the environmental, searches for magnetocaloric mate-rials with capabilities for applications in magnetic re-frigeration at room temperature are increasingly of in-terest in research Notably, the results obtained for
Gd-containing magnetocaloric alloys (GdSiGe, GdCo .)
[1, 2] have shown capabilities for extensive applications
of magnetic refrigeration technology A number of de-vices using magnetic refrigerants have been experimen-tally produced with Gd-containing magnetocaloric al-loys However, Gd-containing alloys have very high costs due to the scarcity of raw materials and the strict manufacturing technology In addition, Gd-containing alloys do not satisfy a number of other requirements such as strength and thermal conductivity Besides Gd-containing alloys, some of other magnetocaloric materials are of interest in studies on the mechanisms and possible applications These materials include As-containing
al-loys (MnAsSb, MnFePAs .) [3,4], La-containing alal-loys (LaFeSi), Heusler alloys (CoMnSi, NiMnSn, NiMnGa .)
[5,6] and ferromagnetic perovskite maganites [7,8] Recently, many researchers have focused on magne-tocaloric materials with amorphous or nanocrystalline structures [9–12] The main advantages of amor-phous or nanocrystalline materials are their capabilities
Trang 2-1715-for the GMCE, low coercivity, high resistivity,
room-temperature magnetic phase transition and low cost,
which are necessary requirements for practical
applica-tions Among this kind of GMCE materials, the
Fe-Zr-based alloys have been attracting the attention of many
scientists [13–19] In this work, we investigate the
mag-netocaloric effect in Fe-Ni-Zr alloys prepared by using
the rapidly-quenched method
II EXPERIMENTS AND DISCUSSION
The alloys with nominal compositions of
Fe90−xNixZr10 (x = 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25) were
prepared from pure metals (99.9%) of Fe, Ni and Zr
An arc-melting method was first used to ensure the
homogeneity of the alloys A melt-spinning method
with various quenching rates was then used to fabricate
the ribbon samples The variation of the quenching rate
depended on such factors as the tangential velocity of
the copper wheel, the hole in the quartz crucible, the
injection pressure, etc The thickness (d) of the ribbon
is commonly used to distinguish the quenching rate of
the ribbon In this work, the ribbons with thicknesses
of 15 and 30 µm were investigated The structure of the
samples was examined by using powder X-ray diffraction
(XRD) The magnetic properties of the samples were
characterized by using magnetization measurements
Figure 1 shows XRD patterns of Fe90−xNixZr10
rib-bons with various thicknesses Diffraction peaks
cor-responding to the crystalline phases of α-Fe, FeNi and
NiZr2are observed in these patterns However, the
crys-talline fraction in all the samples is small,i.e., the
amor-phous phase is dominant We can see that the diffraction
peaks of the thinner (d = 15 m) ribbons, especially the
ones with x = 0 - 15, are very weak, which means these
ribbons are almost amorphous The structural phase
fraction strongly influences the magnetic properties of
the alloys as presented below
Thermomagnetization measurements was performed
for Fe90−xNixZr10 ribbons with different thickness
Fig-ure 2 presents reduced thermomagnetization curves for
some typical ribbons The thermomagnetization curves
of the ribbons with d = 30 µm manifest their multi-phase
behaviors These ribbons have a magnetic phase
transi-tion in the temperature range of 250 - 500 K
correspond-ing to the amorphous phase After the first transition,
the magnetization of these ribbons does not decrease to
zero, but maintains values characterizing the crystalline
phase The magnetic transition in the temperature range
of 250 - 500 K is thought to be of an amorphous nature
because the ribbons prepared at a high quenching rate
(their structure is fully amorphous) only have this
transi-tion As for the ribbons prepared at a low queching rate,
their structure is partly crystalline (the lower the
quench-ing rate, the higher the crystalline fraction) The
magne-tization of the ribbon prepared at temperature above 500
Fig 1 XRD patterns of Fe90−xNixZr10ribbons with d = (a) 30 µm and (b) 15 µm.
Fig 2 (Color online) Reduced thermomagnetization curves in a magnetic field for 100 Oe of Fe90−xNixZr10ribbons
with d = 30 µm The inset shows the thermomagnetization
curves in a magnetic field of 10 Oe of Fe90−xNixZr10ribbons
with d = 15 µm.
K is that of a crystalline phase, which has a Curie tem-perature higher than that of an amorphous phase, and its magnitude is directly proportional to the crystalline
Trang 3Table 1 Influence of Ni concentration on the coercivity (Hc), Curie temperature (T C), maximum entropy change (|∆S m | max), full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the entropy-change peak and refrigerant capacity (RC) of Fe90−xNixZr10ribbons with
d = 15 µm (∆H = 12 kOe).
Ni (%) H c (Oe) T C (K) |∆S m | max(J·kg −1K−1) FWHM (K) RC (J·kg −1)
Fig 3 (Color online) Hysteresis loops at 300 K of
Fe90−xNixZr10 ribbons with d = 15 µm The inset shows
the magnetization at a field of 12 kOe vs Ni concentration in
the samples
fraction; i.e., it depends on the quenching rate The
magnetization is then increased considerably by heating
the ribbons This is due to the overall crystallization
in the ribbons The magnetization of all the ribbons
reaches zero after the last magnetic transition at a
tem-perature of about 960 K As for the ribbons with d =
15 µm, their magnetization is almost zero after the first
magnetic transition This is in agreement with the above
structure analysis These ribbons are almost amorphous
resulting in a single magnetic phase transition Thus,
the quenching rate plays an important role in reducing
the Curie temperature from a high value to a value in
the room temperature region The quenching rate must
be high enough to make the alloys fully amorphous in
the solid state It should be noted that the Curie
tem-perature of the amorphous phase is considerably raised
with increasing Ni concentration in the alloy To the
con-trary, the Curie temperature of Fe90−xMnxZr10 ribbons
is decreased with increasing Mn concentration [5] These
different trends in the variation of the Curie temperature
of the alloy can be understood in terms of the exchange
interaction The exchange interaction of atoms in the
al-loy is enhanced by Ni, but reduced by Mn The effect of
the Ni concentration on the Curie temperature has a
sig-Fig 4 (Color online) Thermomagnetization curves in var-ious magnetic field of Fe90−xNixZr10ribbons with d = 15 µm.
The inset shows the magnetization vs magnetic field at 300
K obtained from virgin magnetization (dir.) and thermomag-netization (ind.) curves
nificant meaning in controlling the working temperature
of the magnetic refrigerants Figure 3 shows the depen-dence of the magnetization on the external field and the
Ni concentration of the ribbons with d = 15 µm We
can see that, the ribbons have a soft magnetic feature and that their magnetization increases with increasing
Ni concentration The results indicate that the addition
of Ni can decrease the coercivity (see Table 1) and in-crease the saturation magnetization of the alloy These two effects of Ni improve its capacity for applications in magnetic refrigeration
According to the obtained results, we selected four samples of Fe90−xNixZr10(x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) ribbons with d = 15 µm to investigate their GMCE These
sam-ples showed a single magnetic phase transition at tem-peratures near room temperature, which is necessary for practical applications of magnetic refrigerants In this
study, we calculate the magnetic entropy change, ∆S m,
based on thermomagnetization data (Fig 4) From the thermomagnetization curves for the samples in var-ious magnetic fields, we can deduce the magnetization
vs magnetic field, M (H), at various temperatures (Fig.
Trang 4Fig 5 (Color online) Magnetization vs magnetic field at
various temperatures an deduced from the
thermomagnetiza-tion curves of Fe85Ni5Zr10ribbons with d = 15 µm.
5) This derivation was checked by comparing data
(di-rect data) for a virgin magnetization curve with those
(indirect data) deduced from the thermomagnetization
curves (inset of Fig 4) We found that the data
ob-tained from the two different ways agreed The ∆S m
was then determined from the M (H) data by using the
following relation:
∆S m=
H2
H1
∂M
∂T
By using the proposed method to calculate the entropy
change of magnetocaloric materials, we could save
exper-imental time and expense This method is also useful for
avoiding the effect of thermal fluctuations in the
mea-surement systems
Figure 6 presents ∆S m (T ) curves (∆H = 12 kOe) for
the Fe90−xNixZr10 (x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) ribbons with
d = 15 µm The maximum entropy change (|∆S m | max)
of the alloy is nearly unchanged (∼1 J·kg −1K−1 with
∆H = 12 kOe) while the full width at half maximum
(FWHM) of the entropy change peak gradually decreases
(from 92 K to 74 K) with increasing Ni concentration
(see Table 1) The refrigerant capacity (RC) of the
sam-ples, which is defined as the product of the maximum
entropy change (∆S max) and the full width at half
max-imum (FWHM) of the entropy change peak, was also
calculated (see the inset of Fig 6) The RC of the
al-loy first increases and then decreases with increasing Ni
concentration from 0 to 15 at% Nevertheless, a
max-imum RC of about 90 J·kg −1 is achieved at a Ni
con-centration of 5 at% for temperature around room
tem-perature This RC of the Fe90−xNixZr10 alloys is higher
than those of some amorphous and nanocrystalline alloys
such as Finemet (Fe68.5Mo5Si13.5B9Cu1Nb3),
Nanop-erm (Fe83−xCoxZr6B10Cu1, Fe91−xMo8Cu1Bx),
HiT-Fig 6 (Color online) ∆S m (T ) curves (∆H = 12 kOe) of
Fe90−xNixZr10ribbons with d = 15 µm The inset indicates
the refrigerant capacity (RC) vs Ni concentration of the alloy
perm (Fe60−xMnxCo18Nb6B16), and bulk amorphous
al-loys (FexCoyBzCuSi3Al5Ga2P10) [6].
Table 1 present a summary of the influence of the Ni
concentration on the coercivity (H c), Curie temperature (T C), maximum entropy change (|∆S m | max), full width
at half maximum (FWHM) of entropy change peak, re-frigerant capacity (RC) of the Fe90−xNixZr10 (x = 0, 5,
10 and 15) ribbons with d = 15 µm In comparison with
other materials, we can see that the Fe-Ni-Zr alloy is
a good candidate for practical applications in magnetic refrigeration technology
III CONCLUSION
The Curie temperature of the Fe-Ni-Zr alloy can be regulated in the region of room temperature by choos-ing an appropriate quenchchoos-ing rate and Ni concentration The quite high maximum entropy change,|∆S m | max >
1 J·kg −1K−1 for ∆H = 12 kOe, and the wide work-ing range around room temperature, ∆T ∼ 85 K, reveal
potential applications of the rapidly-quenched Fe-Ni-Zr-based alloys in magnetic refrigeration technology
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Founda-tion for Science and Technology Development (NAFOS-TED) of Vietnam under grant number of 103.02-2011.23 and the Converging Research Center Program funded
by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2012K001431), South Korea A part of the work was
Trang 5done in the Key Laboratory for Electronic Materials and
Devices, and Laboratory of Magnetism and
Supercon-ductivity, Institute of Materials Science, in Vietnam
REFERENCES
[1] V Provenzano, A J Shapiro and R D Shull, Nature
429, 853 (2004).
[2] V K Pecharsky and K A Gschneidner, Phys Rev Lett
78, 4494 (1997).
[3] O Tegus, B Fuquan, W Dagula, L Zhang, E Br¨uck,
P Z Si, F R de Boer and K H J Buschow, J Alloy
Comp.396, 6 (2005).
[4] L G Medeiros, N A Oliveira and A Troper, J Alloy
Comp.501, 177 (2010).
[5] T Krenke, E Duman, M Acet, E F Wassermann, X
Moya, L Manosa and A Planes, Nature Materials4, 450
(2005)
[6] X Zhou, W Li, H P Kunkel and G Williams, J Phys.:
Condens Matter16, L39 (2004).
[7] M H Phan, H X Peng and S C Yu, J Magn Magn
Mater.316, 562 (2007).
[8] D N H Nam, N V Dai, L V Hong, N X Phuc, S
C Yu, M Tachibana and E Takayama-Muromachi, J
Appl Phys.103, 043905 (2008).
[9] V Franco, C F Conde, A Conde and L F Kiss, Appl Phys Lett.90, 052509 (2007).
[10] J Kovac, P Svec and I Skorvanek, Rev Adv Mater Sci.18, 533 (2008).
[11] D Wua, S Xue, J Frenzel, G Eggelerc, Q Zhai and H Zheng, Mater Sci Eng A534, 568 (2012).
[12] R Zeng, S Q Wang, G D Du, J L Wang, J C Deb-nath, P Shamba, Z Y Fang and S X Dou, J Appl Phys.111, 07E144 (2012).
[13] S G Min, K S Kim and S C Yu, H S Suh and S W Lee, J Appl Phys.97, 10M310 (2005).
[14] V Franco, J S Bl´azquez, M Mill´an, J M Borrego, C
F Conde and A Conde, J Appl Phys 101, 09C503
(2007)
[15] D Mishra, M Gurram, A Reddy, A Perumal, P Sar-avanan and A Srinivasan, Mater Sci Eng B 175, 253
(2010)
[16] R Caballero-Flores, V Franco, A Conde, K E Knipling and M A Willard, Appl Phys Lett.96, 182506 (2010).
[17] Z M Stadnik, P Griesbach, G Dehe and P Giitlich, T Miyazaki, Phys Rev B35, 430 (1987).
[18] K S Kim, B S Kang, S C Yu and Y S Kim, J Korean Phys Soc.57, 1605 (2010).
[19] K S Kim, Y S Kim, J Zidanic, S G Min and S C
Yu, Phys Stat Solid.204, 4096 (2007).