1. Trang chủ
  2. » Thể loại khác

DSpace at VNU: Improving the efficacy of type 1 diabetes therapy by transplantation of immunoisolated insulin-producing cells

10 149 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 10
Dung lượng 813,22 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

DSpace at VNU: Improving the efficacy of type 1 diabetes therapy by transplantation of immunoisolated insulin-producing...

Trang 1

R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E

Improving the efficacy of type 1 diabetes therapy

by transplantation of immunoisolated insulin-producing cells

Phan Kim Ngoc•Pham Van Phuc•

Truong Hai Nhung•Duong Thanh Thuy •

Nguyen Thi Minh Nguyet

Received: 14 February 2011 / Accepted: 19 April 2011 / Published online: 13 May 2011

Ó Japan Human Cell Society and Springer 2011

Abstract Type 1 diabetes occurs when pancreatic islet

b-cells are damaged and are thus unable to secrete insulin

Pancreas- or islet-grafting therapy offers highly efficient

treatment but is limited by inadequate donor islets or

pancreases for transplantation Stem-cell therapy holds

tremendous potential and promises to enhance treatment

efficiency by overcoming the limitations of traditional

therapies In this study, we evaluated the efficiency of

preclinical diabetic treatment Diabetes was induced in

mice by injections of streptozotocin Mesenchymal stem

cells (MSCs) were derived from mouse bone marrow or

human umbilical cord blood and subsequently

differenti-ated into insulin-producing cells These insulin-producing

cells were encapsulated in an alginate membrane to form

capsules Finally, these capsules were grafted into diabetic

mice by intraperitoneal injection Treatment efficiency was

evaluated by monitoring body weight and blood glucose

levels Immune reactions after transplantation were

moni-tored by counting total white blood cells Allografting or

xenografting of encapsulated insulin-producing cells

(IPCs) reduced blood glucose levels and increased body

weight following transplantation Encapsulation with

algi-nate conferred immune isolation and prevented graft

rejection These results provide further evidence supporting

the use of allogeneic or xenogeneic MSCs obtained from

bone marrow or umbilical cord blood for treating type 1

diabetes

Keywords Mesenchymal stem cells Insulin-producing cells Encapsulation  Allograft  Xenograft  Diabetes  Diabetic mouse model Umbilical cord blood  Bone marrow

Introduction Transplantation of insulin-producing cells (IPCs) offers a potential cell replacement therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes However, because of the inadequate number of cells obtained from donors, sources of stem cells to pro-vide IPCs have drawn much attention from many research groups Various studies proved that IPCs could be derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from bone marrow, umbilical cord, fresh or frozen umbilical cord blood, and fat tissue Moreover, numerous studies have been per-formed to test the efficacy of these cell types, as well as IPCs, in type 1 and 2 diabetes in preclinical and clinical settings [3, 7, 12, 16–20, 22–24, 30–34] However, the efficacy of these approaches has remained limited because they typically necessitate administration of immunosup-pressive agents to prevent rejection of transplanted cells The use immunosuppressive drugs can lead to deleterious side effects, such as increased susceptibility to infection, liver and kidney damage, and increased risk of cancer

In addition, immunosuppressive drugs may have unex-pected effects on transplanted tissues, as some reports have shown that cyclosporine A (CsA) can inhibit insulin secretion from pancreatic cells [1, 2, 6, 14, 15, 29] Immunoisolation is a promising technique to protect implanted tissues from rejection One of the most common immunoisolation techniques is to encapsulate cells in a semipermeable membrane, such as alginate, which physi-cally protects the grafts against the host’s immune cells

P K Ngoc  P V Phuc (&)  T H Nhung 

D T Thuy  N T M Nguyet

Laboratory of Stem Cell Research and Application,

University of Science, Vietnam National University,

227 Nguyen Van Cu, District 5, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam

e-mail: pvphuc@hcmuns.edu.vn

DOI 10.1007/s13577-011-0018-z

Trang 2

while allowing nutrients and metabolic products to diffuse

into or out of the capsule To achieve this, the cells are

encapsulated within a hydrogel or alginate membrane using

gravity, electrostatic forces, or coaxial airflow to form the

capsule

Allogeneic and xenogeneic transplantation of

encap-sulated islets of Langerhans cells have been shown to

restore normal blood glucose levels in animals in which

diabetes was induced by autoimmune diseases or

chemi-cal injury—mice [8,10,21], dog [25–27], and nonhuman

primates [28]—without relying on immunosuppressive

agents In most of these studies, the transplantations were

performed by intraperitoneal injection of islets Recently,

however, Dufrane et al [8] reported the generation of

encapsulated porcine islets in a Ca–alginate material and

implanted these capsules under the kidney capsule of

nondiabetic Cynomolgus maccacus In that study, the

implanted porcine islets survived for up to 6 months after

implantation without immunosuppression, even in animals

administered with porcine immunoglobulin G (IgG)

Moreover, C-peptide was detected in 71% of the animals

After 135 and 180 days, the explanted capsules still

synthesized insulin and responded to glucose stimulation

[8]

In this study, we encapsulated IPCs that were

differen-tiated from MSCs and tested their efficacy in type 1

dia-betes To evaluate the capabilities of the encapsulated IPCs,

we conducted both allogeneic and xenogeneic

transplanta-tion The former was conducted using IPCs derived from

mouse bone marrow MSCs and the latter using cells

pro-duced by mesenchymal tissue from human umbilical cord

blood

Materials and methods

Isolation of MSCs from human umbilical cord blood

MSCs were isolated as previously described [23] Briefly,

human umbilical cord blood was obtained from the

umbilical cord vein of mothers attending Hung Vuong

Hospital (Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam) with informed

consent from the mother All donors must have signed an

agreement with our laboratory prior to donation All blood

sample procedures and manipulations were approved by

our Institutional Ethical Committee (Laboratory of Stem

cell Research and Application, University of Science,

VNU-HCM, VN) and the Hospital Ethical Committee

(Hung Vuong Hospital, HCM, VN) To isolate

mononu-clear cells (MNCs), each unit of blood was diluted to 1:1

with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and loaded onto

Fi-coll–Hypaque solution (1.077 g/ml, Sigma-Aldrich, St

Louis, MO, USA) After density gradient centrifugation at

8009g for 16 min at room temperature, MNCs were har-vested from the interphase, washed twice with PBS, and resuspended in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM) Next, the cell suspension was transferred to a T-25 culture flask (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) containing

3 ml of IMDM, 20% FBS, 10 ng/ml fibroblast growth factor, 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF), and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic solution (all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich) The cultures were then maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% carbon dioxide (CO2), and the medium was changed 2 days later When the fibroblast-like cells at the base of the flask reached high confluence, they were harvested with 0.25% trypsin–ethy-lenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) (Sigma-Aldrich) and subcultured at a 1:3 dilution as passage one to yield human (h)MSCs

Isolation of MSCs from mouse bone marrow

To obtain bone marrow, 6- to 8-week-old mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation The hind limbs were dissected and stored on ice in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 19 penicillin/strep-tomycin Bone marrow cells were collected by flushing the femurs and tibias with DMEM/F12 plus 10% FBS (Sigma-Aldrich) The bone marrow cell suspension was plated on a T-25 flask at a density of 4 9 106cells/cm2 The culture media were replaced 2 days later to remove nonadherent cells The cells were maintained for 3–4 weeks and sub-cultured following harvest with 0.25% trypsin–EDTA to yield mouse (m)MSCs

Characterization of MSCs Adipogenic differentiation assays were performed as pre-viously described [23] Briefly, MSCs were incubated in medium supplemented with 10-8M dexamethasone and

10-4M L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich) with changes in media every 5 days After 30 days, the cultures were fixed in 3% formaldehyde in PBS for 10 min and stained with Oil Red O The phenotype of MSCs was analyzed by flow cytometry using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA) The following monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA) were used: fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled CD13, CD14; CD34, CD45, CD44, anti-CD90, anti-c-kit, and anti-CD73 Isotype controls were used in all cases

Differentiation of hMSCs and mMSCs into IPCs

To differentiate cells into a pancreatic endocrine lineage, the expanded MSCs from passage 5 were allowed to reach

Trang 3

80–90% confluence and induced to differentiate into IPCs

by an enhanced three-step protocol [13,23] Briefly, in step

1, the cell monolayer was treated for 24 h with high-glucose

DMEM (H-DMEM, 25 mmol/L glucose) supplemented

with 10% FBS and 10-6 mol/L retinoic acid

(Sigma-Aldrich), followed by H-DMEM containing 10% FBS alone

for a further 2 days In step 2, the medium was replaced

with low-glucose DMEM (L-DMEM, 1,000 mg glucose/L)

supplemented with 10% FBS, 10 mmol/L nicotinamide

(Sigma-Aldrich), and 20 ng/ml EGF for 6 days In step 3, to

mature the IPCs, cells were cultured with L-DMEM

sup-plemented with 10% FBS and 10 nmol/L exendin-4

(Sigma-Aldrich) for 6 days

Characterization of differentiated IPCs

Cellular differentiation was monitored by observing the

3D formation of islet-like cell clusters, the expression of

insulin detected by immunocytochemistry As a control

group, cells were cultured in L-DMEM containing only

10% FBS Immunocytochemistry was also performed

Briefly, the induced cells were fixed in 4%

paraformal-dehyde, washed three times with PBS, permeabilized with

PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) and

blocked with 10% normal serum for 40 min at room

temperature The cells were then incubated with the

pri-mary antibody (mouse anti-human C-peptide antibody)

followed by FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG In all

immunocytochemistry assays, negative staining controls

were established by omitting the primary antibody

Nuclei were detected using Hoechst 33342

(Sigma-Aldrich) staining Images were captured using a Carl

Zeiss Cell Observer microscope with a monochromatic

cool-charged coupled camera (Carl Zeiss AG, Jena,

Germany)

Encapsulation of IPCs

Sodium alginate was dissolved in sterile water at 2.2% w/v,

followed by the addition of sterile 0.9% sodium chloride

(NaCl) (0.2 ml per 1.8 ml alginate solution) The solution

was mixed and centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for 5 min The

IPCs were washed twice with 0.9% saline and pelleted by

centrifugation The alginate was mixed evenly with the

cells at a volume of 800 ll alginate per 100 ll of cell

suspension This mixture was then loaded into a 1-ml

syringe connected to a 32.5-gauge needle The capsules

were formed by pushing the syringe To provide

mechan-ical strength, the capsules were incubated in 30 ml of

20 mM barium chloride (BaCl2) for 2 min The

differen-tiated IPCs derived from mouse and human MSCs were

labeled as mIPCs and hIPCs, respectively

Measurement of insulin secretion in vitro Insulin secretion was measured in vitro by radioimmuno-assay (RIA) after static stimulating Briefly, 30 capsules or IPCs (mIPCs or hIPCs) were picked and transferred into 1.5-ml tubes The capsules or IPCs were left to settle for a few minutes and the supernatant was then discarded Samples were incubated with 250 ll of the stimulation buffers [oxygenated Krebs–Ringer bicarbonate buffer:

137 mM NaCl, 20 mM potassium chloride (KCl), 1.2 mM potassium di-hydrogen phosphate(KH2PO4),1.2 mM mag-nesium sulfate water (MgSO4-7H2O), 2.5 mM calcium chloride (CaCl2-2H2O), 25 mM sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), 0.25% bovine serum albumin (BSA)] for 1 h at 37°C and 5% CO2, with each sample prepared in triplicate After lightly mixing the samples a few times, the superna-tant was collected into new 1.5-ml tubes for insulin mea-surement using RIA IPCs were used as control samples Transplantation of encapsulated IPCs

Male Swiss mice were obtained from the Pasteur Institute (Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam) All procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Ethics Committee of our university and laboratory Diabetes was induced in these mice by intraperitoneal injection of 50 mg/kg streptozotocin (Sigma-Aldrich) once daily for 5 days before transplanta-tion The mice were considered to be diabetic if two con-secutive blood glucose readings were [250 mg/dl Mice were anesthetized with ketamine (50 mg/kg) and 200 ll PBS containing 200–300 capsules, or 105IPCs were injected directly into the portal vein using a 14-gauge catheter A negative control, diabetic group received PBS alone Evaluation of immune responses, body weight, and blood glucose and insulin levels

To monitor immune responses, peripheral blood was col-lected on days 7, 15, and 30, suspended in PBS, and counted using a Nucleocounter (Chemomotec, Denmark) Briefly, blood samples were lysed with lysis solution to permeabilize the cell membrane and then neutralized using neutralization solution The samples were then loaded onto

a cassette, stained with propidium iodide, and counted Blood glucose was evaluated by measuring glucose levels

in tail-vein blood using an Accu-ChekÒ glucose monitor (Hoffmann-La Roche Inc) Body weight was measured every 2–3 days

Statistical analysis All data are presented as means ± standard error (SE) Comparisons between the two groups were performed

Trang 4

using Student’s two-sample t test or analysis of variance

(ANOVA), as appropriate Values of P \ 0.05 were

con-sidered statistically significant

Results

hMSCs and mMSCs expressed MSC markers

and successfully differentiated into adipocytes

Although there were some slight differences in the

mor-phology of MSCs obtained from the umbilical cord blood

and bone marrow—the hMSCs tended to be larger than the

mMSCs (Fig.1a, d)—the fibroblast-like shape was still

recognizable in both cell lines Furthermore,

characteriza-tion for specific markers by flow cytometry revealed

sim-ilar profiles of both cell lines Both lines were positive for

CD13, CD44, CD90, and CD166 but negative for CD14,

CD34, CD45, and HLA-DR (Fig.2), whereas mMSCs

showed higher expression of CD90 and CD44 Overall,

90.23 ± 1.25%, 85 ± 1.95%, 92 ± 2.15% and 50 ± 3.29%

(n = 3) of mMSCs and 72 ± 1.34%, 75 ± 2.18%, 83 ±

2.52%, and 73 ± 4.32% of hMSCs were positive for

CD13, CD44, CD90, and CD166, respectively (Fig.2) All

MSCs from both sources could be induced into adipocytes

(Fig.1b, c, e, f)

Differentiation of MSCs into IPCs and capsulation

Following exposure to the differentiation media, hMSCs

and mMSCs differentiated IPCs using the same culture

conditions Both cell types started to aggregate by day 5

and formed islet-like clusters by days 7–9 (Fig.3a, b, d, e) Immunocytochemistry analysis confirmed that the cells expressed insulin protein (Fig.3c, f) During capsulation,

we measured the size of 100 capsules per preparation, and the mean capsule size was 325 ± 30.5 lm (n = 5) Although detectable insulin was measured in the superna-tant after encapsulation, its secretion was significantly reduced compared with that of controls after stimulation (3.2 ± 1.5 vs 21.3 ± 9.1 lU/h; P = 0.05)

Effects of IPC transplantation on the body weight

of diabetic mice

As shown in Fig.4, the body weight of the control group increased gradually over the 30-day study period, from 33.2 ± 1.03 to 43.7 ± 0.97 g, whereas that in the negative control/diabetic group that received PBS decreased from 25.16 ± 1.00 to 15.66 ± 0.64 g Furthermore, only two (of five) mice in the negative control group survived to day 30 Significant differences in body weight were observed among the other experimental groups Noticeably, the body weight of mice given unencapsulated hIPCs showed the lowest treatment efficacy, with a slight decrease in body weight from 20.88 ± 0.68 g on day 1 to 20.28 ± 1.63 g on day 30 Similarly, the body weight of mice treated with unencapsulated mIPCs decreased from 25.14 ± 1.00 to 24.62 ± 0.96 g Despite the absence of weight gain, four (of five) mice in both groups survived until day 30, which was higher than that in the negative control group The body weight of mice increased significantly over mice that received encapsulated hIPCs—from 26.82 ± 0.68 g at day

1 to 29.46 ± 0.17 g at day 30—whereas weight gain was

Fig 1 Isolation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells

(MSCs) isolated from human umbilical cord blood (a, hMSCs) and

mouse bone marrow (d, mMSCs) were capable of differentiation into

adipocytes (b, c for hMSCs and e, f for mMSCs) The differentiated MSCs stored triglyceride in the cytoplasm (b, e) and the lipid vacuoles turned red following Oil Red O staining (c, f)

Trang 5

more pronounced in mice that received encapsulated

mI-PCs (from 23.34 ± 0.88 to 34.16 ± 0.65 g), corresponding

to a mean weight gain of 10.82 g over 30 days This

increase in weight was comparable with that observed in

the control group, in which mean weight gain was 10.5 g

Accordingly, these changes in body weight confirmed the

beneficial effects of IPC transplantation, particularly

encapsulated IPCs, on the status of diabetic mice, and also

confirmed that encapsulated mIPCs had the greatest effects

on body weight

Effects of IPC transplantation on blood glucoses levels

in diabetic mice

As would be expected, the blood glucose level of the control (nondiabetic) mice was broadly stable during the study, being 98 ± 9.20 mg/dl on day 1 and 105.8 ± 9.26 mg/dl on day 30 On the other hand, marked changes

in blood glucose levels were noted in the other groups

In the negative control diabetic group, the blood glucose level increased from 318 ± 25.43 mg/dl on day 1 to Fig 2 Cell-surface markers expressed on human (hMSC) and mouse (mMSC) mesenchymal stem cells

Trang 6

377.8 ± 21.96 mg/dl on day 30 Interestingly, the greatest

increase in blood glucose was observed in mice treated

with unencapsulated hIPCs, increasing from 281.8 ±

21.19 mg/dl on day 1 to 464.8 ± 21.03 mg/dl on day 30

An increase, although with a slightly smaller increment,

was also noted in mice treated with unencapsulated mIPCs,

with blood glucose strongly increasing from 217.4 ±

14.63 mg/dl on day 1 to 408.8 ± 18.20 mg/dl on day 30

In contrast, the blood glucose level in the encapsulated

hIPC group tended to slightly increase over time

(263.3 ± 17.64 mg/dl on day 1 to 299.2 ± 32 mg/dl on

day 30), whereas a more pronounced decrease was noted in the encapsulated mIPC group (from 277.4 ± 15.11 mg/dl

on day 1 to 144.8 ± 6.57 mg/dl on day 30) (Fig.5) These results mean that transplantation of IPCs derived from different sources may have different effects on glucose levels in diabetic mice Of note, transplantation of unen-capsulated IPCs was unable to reduced blood glucose levels, whereas mice given unencapsulated hIPCs experi-enced greater increases in glucose levels compared with untreated diabetic mice In contrast, transplantation of encapsulated IPCs delivered positive effects on glucose

Fig 3 Encapsulation of insulin-producing cells (IPCs) Human (a–

c) and mouse (d–f) mesenchymal stem cells were differentiated into

IPCs, which resulted in marked changes in shape (a, d: before

differentiation; b, e: after differentiation) The resulting IPCs were stained with C-peptide antibody (c, f), confirming insulin production

Fig 4 Changes in body weight

of mice treated with

unencapsulated and

encapsulated human- (hIPCs) or

mouse-derived (mIPCs)

insulin-producing cells Diabetic mice

were injected with

unencapsulated or encapsulated

IPCs derived from human or

mouse mesenchymal stem cells.

Control nondiabetic mice (no

transplantation of IPCs) PBS

PBS-treated diabetic mice

(negative control)

Trang 7

control in diabetic mice, with stabilization of blood glucose

levels in the hIPC group and a marked decrease in the

mIPC group

Immune responses in mice treated with IPCs

The immune response showed differences between the

individual groups As shown in Fig.6, the white blood cell

count in untreated control and in PBS-treated diabetic mice

showed a small but nonsignificant change over time In the

PBS-treated diabetic mice, the white blood cell count had

decreased slightly on day 15 but returned to the baseline

level on day 30 In mice given unencapsulated IPCs, the

white blood cell count increased over time in the hIPC

group by day 15, indicating marked immune activity at this

time, whereas a further increase was noted by day 30

Increases in white blood cell counts between days 1 and 15

were similar in both groups of mice given encapsulated

IPCs, although there was a gradual reduction in the hIPC

group versus a slight increase in the mIPC group between

days 15 and 30 Among the four groups of mice given

IPCs, those given the encapsulated mIPC exhibited the

lowest immune response, with a moderate but statistically

insignificant increase in white blood cell count compared

with the PBS-treated diabetic group This indicates

rela-tively little antigen presentation following implantation of

encapsulated IPCs, particularly mIPCs, by preventing the

cells’ surface antigens from being detected by the host

Discussion

MSCs are an important source of stem cells, with enormous

potential for use in regenerative medicine MSCs have long

been considered for treating several diseases, including

diabetes, by implanting MSCs and IPCs derived from MSCs

A major hurdle, however, when using these cells, is tissue rejection by the host Although immunosuppressant drugs can be used, they are associated with potentially serious side effects, such as infection, cancer, and kidney and liver damage Therefore, to overcome these issues, we encapsu-lated the cells with a biocompatible membrane composed of alginate To determine the efficacy of this technique, we compared transplantation of encapsulated or nonencapsu-lated IPCs derived from allogeneic or xenogeneic sources into diabetic mice To date, several studies have evaluated allogeneic and xenogeneic transplantation of encapsulated islets to improve grafting efficiency animals with diabetes induced by autoimmune disease or chemical induction, including in mice [9,10,21], dogs [25–27] and monkeys [28]

in the absence of immunosuppression

Based on these earlier studies, we proposed a novel encapsulation technique to protect from rejection the implanted IPCs derived from mMSCs (for allografting) or hMSCs (for xenografting) Cells harvested from mouse bone marrow or human umbilical cord blood expressed typical characteristics of MSCs Their shape was similar to that of fibroblasts, and they were positive for CD13, CD44, CD90, and CD166 and negative for hematopoietic markers such as CD14 (a monocyte marker), CD34 (a hematopoi-etic stem cell marker), CD45 (a white blood cell marker), and HLA-DR (a leucocyte marker) The differentiation potency of these MSCs was also confirmed by in vitro adipogenesis following culture in an inducing medium These results indicate that we successfully isolated MSCs from mouse bone marrow and human umbilical cord blood Next, we differentiated the MSCs into IPCs using a three-step protocol, as previously described [23] The induced cells exhibited a change in morphology and aggregated in islet-like clusters As reported elsewhere [13,23], we confirmed the differentiation of MSCs into IPCs by immunocyto-chemistry After staining, we observed that the induced cells

Fig 5 Changes in blood

glucose levels of mice treated

with unencapsulated and

encapsulated human- (hIPCs) or

mouse-derived (mIPCs)

insulin-producing cells Diabetic mice

were injected with

unencapsulated or encapsulated

IPCs derived from human or

mouse mesenchymal stem cells.

Control nondiabetic mice (no

transplantation of IPCs) PBS

phosphate-buffered-saline-treated diabetic mice (negative

control)

Trang 8

expressed C-peptide, confirming that the MSCs were

dif-ferentiated into IPCs and were capable of producing insulin

The resulting cells were then encapsulated in the alginate

solution In this step, we encapsulate the IPCs in an alginate

membrane to achieve a size suitable for transplantation The

in vitro efficacy of encapsulation was evaluated by

meaing insulin secretion from the IPC capsules to the

sur-rounding environment Following stimulation with KCl for

1 h, we measured the concentration of insulin in the medium

by RIA Insulin could go out the membrane Using the RIA

method, we detected the presence of insulin in inducible

medium supernatant Of course, the insulin quantity was

lower compared with controls The results were consistent

with those reported elsewhere, as David et al [4]

demon-strated that liver cells encapsulated in alginate exerted

nor-mal metabolic activity

To demonstrate that transplantation of encapsulated

cells will help avoid immune rejection, we next compared

the efficacy of allogeneic and xenogeneic IPCs with or

without encapsulation on body weight, blood glucose

lev-els, and white blood cell count of diabetic mice without

immunosuppression The mice that received encapsulated

IPC showed significant differences in these parameters

compared with mice that received unencapsulated IPCs

Allogeneic transplantation of encapsulated IPCs (i.e.,

mI-PCs) yielded greater treatment efficacy compared with

transplantation of unencapsulated IPCs Indeed, the body

weight of mice given encapsulated mIPCs increased

stea-dily and was similar to that of control/nondiabetic mice,

whereas no weight gain was noted in mice given

unen-capsulated IPCs Meanwhile, the blood glucose level of

mice given an allogeneic transplantation of encapsulated

IPCs decreased after day 6, reaching a level similar to that

in nondiabetic mice on day 30 In contrast, no improve-ments in blood glucose levels were noted in the two groups

of mice given unencapsulated IPCs We explain these findings in terms of the host’s immune responses, as allo-geneic transplantation of encapsulated IPCs ameliorated the effects of rejection compared with unencapsulated cells Thus, allogeneic transplantation of encapsulated IPCs derived from mMSCs helped protect the grafts from rejection and enhanced treatment efficiency in diabetic mice These results are consistent with a study reported by

De Vos [5], who allografted encapsulated islets in diabetic mice and achieved normal blood glucose levels 5 days after transplantation

With xenografting, as with allografting, the effects of encapsulation of IPCs were also evident on body weight and blood glucose levels Indeed, compared with unencapsulated hIPCs, the implantation of encapsulated hIPCs enabled weight gain, stabilized blood glucose levels, and reduced rejection via the immune response Accordingly, the mice given encapsulated hIPCs showed a remarkable recovery, although the magnitude of these effects was less than those achieved with encapsulated mIPCs Nevertheless, encapsu-lated IPCs derived from xenogeneic and allogeneic sources had beneficial effects on the diabetic step, indicating that encapsulation plays a critical role in reducing immune rejection and thus improving treatment efficiency

Because implantation of encapsulated IPCs derived from a xenogeneic source did not completely overcome rejection, if xenotransplantation is necessary, it may be prudent to use encapsulation in combination with short-term immunosuppression to avoid rejection This approach

Fig 6 Immune responses in

mice treated with

unencapsulated and

encapsulated human- (hIPCs) or

mouse-derived (mIPCs)

insulin-producing cells Diabetic mice

were injected with

unencapsulated or encapsulated

IPCs derived from human or

mouse mesenchymal stem cells.

The white blood cell count was

determined on day 7 (blue), day

15 (red), and day 30 (green).

Control nondiabetic mice (no

transplantation of IPCs) PBS

phosphate-buffered-saline-treated diabetic mice (negative

control)

Trang 9

was investigated by Figliuzzi et al [11], who showed that

xenotransplantation of encapsulated islets in combination

with short-term immunosuppression prolong the life of the

implanted islets

Taken together, the results of our study indicate that

MSCs can be induced to differentiate into IPCs, thus

offering an important source of cells for treating diabetes

Allogeneic or xenogeneic transplantation of induced IPCs

confers higher treatment efficacy when the cells are

im-munoisolated by encapsulation in an alginate membrane

Our findings shed light on the potential use of stem cells,

particularly MSCs, for treating diabetes Because the use of

autografts faces many technical problems, particularly the

limited availability of stem cells, immunoisolating the cells

by encapsulation before transplantation may offer a better

choice to treat diabetes and other diseases using stem cells

Moreover, these findings open a new direction to treat

diabetes using stem cells preserved in a stem cell bank or

blood bank for patients themselves or for their relatives

Conclusions

In conclusion, immunoisolated MSCs can be used with

high efficacy to treat type 1 diabetes MSCs can be

dif-ferentiated into IPCs and encapsulated in alginate

Trans-plantation of the encapsulated IPCs obtained from

allogeneic or xenogeneic sources had greater efficacy than

unencapsulated cells for treating type 1 diabetes in a mouse

model Encapsulation of cells in an alginate membrane

reduced IPC rejection by the host’s immune response The

treated mice achieved normal blood glucose levels and

gained weight by 30 days after transplantation of the

encapsulated IPCs These results demonstrate the

enor-mous potential of using cells induced from stem cells to

treat type 1 diabetes We believe that the approach

described here is not only suitable for treating type 1

dia-betes but also other diseases in which differentiated stem

cells can be used

Acknowledgments This work was funded by grants from Vietnam

National University, Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM), Laboratory of

Stem Cell Research and Application, University of Science (SCL),

GeneWorld Ltd company We thank Hung Vuong Hospital for

sup-plying umbilical cord blood samples to perform this research.

Conflict of interest None.

References

1 Alejandro R, Feldman EC, Bloom AD, Kenyon NS Effects of

cyclosporin on insulin and C-peptide secretion in healthy beagles.

Diabetes 1989;6:698–703.

2 Bani-Sacchi T, Bani D, Filipponi F, Michel A, Houssin D Immunocytochemical and ultrastructural changes of islet cells in rats treated long-term with cyclosporine at immunotherapeutic doses Transplantation 1990;5:982–7.

3 Chandra VGS, Phadnis S, Nair PD, Bhonde RR Generation of pancreatic hormone-expressing islet-like cell aggregates from murine adipose tissue-derived stem cells Stem Cells 2009;8: 1941–53.

4 David B, Dufresne M, Nagel MD, Legallais C In vitro assess-ment of encapsulated C3A hepatocytes functions in a fluidized bed bioreactor Biotechnol Prog 2004;4:1204–12.

5 De Vos P, De Haan BJ, Wolters GH, Strubbe JH, Van Schilfg-aarde R Improved biocompatibility but limited graft survival after purification of alginate for microencapsulation of pancreatic islets Diabetologia 1997;3:262–70.

6 Dean SK, Scott H, Keogh GW, Roberts S, Tuch BE Effect of immunosuppressive doses of cyclosporine on pancreatic beta cell function in pigs Am J Vet Res 2002;11:1501–6.

7 Dong QY, Chen L, Gao GQ, Wang L, Song J, Chen B, Xu YX, Sun L Allogeneic diabetic mesenchymal stem cells transplanta-tion in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat Clin Invest Med 2008;6:E328–37.

8 Dufrane D, Steenberghe M, Goebbels RM, Saliez A, Guiot Y, Gianello P The influence of implantation site on the biocom-patibility and survival of alginate encapsulated pig islets in rats Biomaterials 2006;17:3201–8.

9 Duvivier-Kali VF, Omer A, Parent RJ, O’Neil JJ, Weir GC Complete protection of islets against allorejection and autoim-munity by a simple barium–alginate membrane Diabetes 2001;8:1698–705.

10 Fan MY, Lum ZP, Fu XW, Levesque L, Tai IT, Sun AM Reversal of diabetes in BB rats by transplantation of encapsulated pancreatic islets Diabetes 1990;4:519–22.

11 Figliuzzi M, Plati T, Cornolti R, Adobati F, Fagiani A, Rossi

L, Remuzzi G, Remuzzi A Biocompatibility and function of microencapsulated pancreatic islets Acta Biomater 2006;2: 221–7.

12 Gabr MM, Sobh MM, Zakaria MM, Refaie AF, Ghoneim MA Transplantation of insulin-producing clusters derived from adult bone marrow stem cells to treat diabetes in rats Exp Clin Transplant 2008;3:236–43.

13 Gao F, Wu DQ, Hu YH, Jin GX, Li GD, Sun TW, Li FJ In vitro cultivation of islet-like cell clusters from human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells Transl Res 2008;6:293–302.

14 Gillison SL, Bartlett ST, Curry DL Inhibition by cyclosporine of insulin secretion–a beta cell-specific alteration of islet tissue function Transplantation 1991;5:890–5.

15 Hahn HJ, Dunger A, Laube F, Besch W, Radloff E, Kauert C, Kotzke G Reversibility of the acute toxic effect of cyclosporin A

on pancreatic B cells of Wistar rats Diabetologia 1986;8: 489–94.

16 Kadam S, Muthyala S, Nair P, Bhonde R Human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells and islet-like cell clusters gen-erated from these cells as a novel source for stem cell therapy in diabetes Rev Diabet Stud 2010;2:168–82.

17 Kim SC, Han DJ, Lee JY Adipose tissue derived stem cells for regeneration and differentiation into insulin-producing cells Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2010;2:190–4.

18 Koblas T, Zacharovova´ K, Berkova´ Z, Leontovic I, Dovolilova´ E, Za´mecnı´k L, Saudek F In vivo differentiation of human umbil-ical cord blood-derived cells into insulin-producing beta cells Folia Biol (Praha) 2009;6:224–32.

19 Li M, Abraham NG, Vanella L, Zhang Y, Inaba M, Hosaka N, Hoshino S, Shi M, Ambrosini YM, Gershwin ME, Ikehara S Successful modulation of type 2 diabetes in db/db mice with

Trang 10

intra-bone marrow–bone marrow transplantation plus concurrent

thymic transplantation J Autoimmun 2010;4:414–23.

20 Neshati Z, Matin MM, Bahrami AR, Moghimi A Differentiation

of mesenchymal stem cells to insulin-producing cells and their

impact on type 1 diabetic rats J Physiol Biochem 2010;2:181–7.

21 Omer A, Keegan M, Czismadia E, De Vos P, Van Rooijen N,

Bonner-Weir S, Weir GC Macrophage depletion improves

sur-vival of porcine neonatal pancreatic cell clusters contained in

alginate macrocapsules transplanted into rats

Xenotransplanta-tion 2003;3:240–51.

22 Parekh VS, Joglekar MV, Hardikar AA Differentiation of human

umbilical cord blood-derived mononuclear cells to endocrine

pancreatic lineage Differentiation 2009;4:232–40.

23 Phuc PV, Nhung TH, Loan DT, Chung DC, Ngoc PK

Differ-entiating of banked human umbilical cord blood-derived

mes-enchymal stem cells into insulin-secreting cells In Vitro Cell Dev

Biol Anim 2011;1:54–63.

24 Shao S, Gao Y, Xie B, Xie F, Lim SK, Li G Correction of

hyperglycemia in Type 1 diabetic models by transplantation of

encapsulated insulin-producing cells derived from mouse embryo

progenitor J Endocrinol 2011 (epub ahead of print).

25 Soon-Shiong P, Feldman E, Nelson R, Heintz R, Merideth N,

Sandford P, Zheng T, Komtebedde J Long-term reversal of

diabetes in the large animal model by encapsulated islet

trans-plantation Transplant Proc 1992;6:2946–7.

26 Soon-Shiong P, Feldman E, Nelson R, Heintz R, Yao Q, Yao Z,

Zheng T, Merideth N, Skjak-Braek G, Espevik T Long-term

reversal of diabetes by the injection of immunoprotected islets.

Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;12:5843–7.

27 Soon-Shiong P, Feldman E, Nelson R, Komtebedde J, Smidsrod

O, Skjak-Braek G, Espevik T, Heintz R, Lee M Successful

reversal of spontaneous diabetes in dogs by intraperitoneal

mi-croencapsulated islets Transplantation 1992;5:769–74.

28 Sun Y, Ma X, Zhou D, Vacek I, Sun AM Normalization of diabetes in spontaneously diabetic cynomologus monkeys by xenografts of microencapsulated porcine islets without immu-nosuppression J Clin Invest 1996;6:1417–22.

29 van Schilfgaarde R, van der Burg MP, van Suylichem PT, Fro¨lich

M, Gooszen HG, Moolenaar AJ Interference by cyclosporine with the endocrine function of the canine pancreas Transplan-tation 1987;1:13–6.

30 Wang HS, Shyu JF, Shen WS, Hsu HC, Chi TC, Chen CP, Huang

SW, Shyr YM, Tang KT, Chen TH Transplantation of insulin producing cells derived from umbilical cord stromal mesenchy-mal stem cells to treat NOD mice Cell Transplant 2010 (epub ahead of print).

31 Wu LF, Wang NN, Liu YS, Wei X Differentiation of Wharton’s jelly primitive stromal cells into insulin-producing cells in com-parison with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells Tissue Eng Part A 2009;10:2865–73.

32 Xie QP, Huang H, Xu B, Dong X, Gao SL, Zhang B, Wu YL Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into insulin-producing cells upon microenvironmental manipulation in vitro Differentiation 2009;5:483–91.

33 Zhang Y, Ren Z, Zou C, Wang S, Luo B, Li F, Liu S, Zhang YA Insulin-producing cells from human pancreatic islet-derived progenitor cells following transplantation in mice Cell Biol Int.

2010 (Epub ahead of print).

34 Zhang Y, Shen W, Hua J, Lei A, Lv C, Wang H, Yang C, Gao Z, Dou Z Pancreatic islet-like clusters from bone marrow mesen-chymal stem cells of human first-trimester abortus can cure streptozocin-induced mouse diabetes Rejuvenation Res 2010;6: 695–706.

Ngày đăng: 14/12/2017, 17:57

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm