Our calculations show that the SiAH bonds that are oriented toward the center of the ring of a CPS molecule play a significant role in the interaction between CPS molecules.. This study h
Trang 1Ab-initio study of intermolecular interaction and structure of liquid
cyclopentasilane
Pham Tien Lama, Ayumu Sugiyamaa,b, Takashi Masudab, Tatsuya Shimodaa,b, Nobuo Otsukaa,
Dam Hieu Chia,b,c,⇑
a
Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 1-1 Asahidai, Nomi, Ishikawa 923-1292, Japan
b Japan Science and Technology Agency, ERATO, Shimoda Nano-Liquid Process Project, 2-5-3 Asahidai, Nomi, Ishikawa 923-1211, Japan
c
Faculty of Physics, Hanoi University of Science, 334 Nguyen Trai, Thanh Xuan, Hanoi, Viet Nam
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 13 May 2011
In final form 15 February 2012
Available online 13 March 2012
Keywords:
DFT
Cyclopentasilanes
Liquid silicon
a b s t r a c t
We report on an ab initio calculation study of intermolecular interactions between cyclopentasilane (CPS) molecules in liquid CPS Our calculations show that the SiAH bonds that are oriented toward the center of the ring of a CPS molecule play a significant role in the interaction between CPS molecules This interac-tion results in the formainterac-tion of special bonds between CPS molecules, which resemble hydrogen bonds These hydrogen bonds cause a red shift of IR absorption peaks corresponding to the SiAH stretch vibra-tion The formation of hydrogen bonds in the liquid phase of CPS was further confirmed by ab-initio molecular dynamics simulations The analysis of pair correlation functions has shown a significant con-tribution of hydrogen bonds to the structure of the CPS liquid system
Ó 2012 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved
1 Introduction
In recent years, liquid processes for fabricating electronic
de-vices have attracted considerable attention In contrast to
conven-tional processes, liquid processes improve the material utilization
efficiency, simplify the processing method, and involve smaller
and low-cost manufacturing apparatus [22,14,18,17,25,31,7]
Li-quid processes enable us to fabricate large-scale electronic circuits
and introduce novel applications that would be difficult to develop
using conventional techniques[23]
The preparation of functional solutions, which are stable
solu-tions containing materials, for a target device is the most
impor-tant step in the liquid processes For the fabrication of electronic
devices, cyclopentasilane (Si5H10-CPS) is the most suitable
candi-date for a source material of functional solutions among various
silicon compounds because it has the ability to undergo
ring-open-ing polymerization and transform into high-purity Si In addition,
CPS can also act as a solvent of polysilanes Recently, Shimoda
et al successfully synthesized liquid silicon from CPS by
photo-polymerization[23]; the obtained solution of polysilanes can be
transformed into an amorphous Si film via thermal decomposition
The results of the described above study have raised a realistic
possibility of the large-scale applications of liquid processes to the
fabrication of Si-based electronic devices by using CPS To this end,
however, it is necessary to clarify and control the entire micro-scopic process of polymerization, because such processes occur
in the liquid state; hence, they involve complex interactions of the constituent molecules For this purpose, both a first principles simulation approach and an experimental approach are required
In this study, we have investigated the structure of the liquid CPS We have focused on interactions between CPS molecules and the bonding nature in CPS solution The investigations were mainly based on ab initio calculations, including density functional theory (DFT)[11,13]calculations, Hartree–Fock (HF) calculations, and second order Møller–Plesset (MP2) perturbation theory calcu-lations Ab-initio molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of liquid CPS were performed using the Car–Parrinello method [1] This study has shown that the SiAH bonds of a CPS molecule that are oriented toward the centers of the rings of the other CPS molecules play a significant role in the interaction between the CPS mole-cules This interaction results in the formation of special bonds be-tween CPS molecules which resemble hydrogen bonds Similarly to hydrogen bonds in the water system, these hydrogen bonds cause the red shift of IR absorption peaks corresponding to the SiAH stretch vibration The formation of hydrogen bonds in liquid CPS was further confirmed via ab initio molecular dynamics simula-tions using a system of 27 CPS molecules The pair correlation ra-dial distribution functions (RDFs) between the centers of mass of CPS molecules and H atoms, gCenterH(r), and those between the center of mass of CPS molecules and Si atoms, gCenterSi(r), were analyzed gCenterH(r) shows a peak at approximately 2.1 Å, which
is attributed to the hydrogen atoms which are involved in a
0301-0104/$ - see front matter Ó 2012 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
⇑ Corresponding author at: Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology,
1-1 Asahidai, Nomi, Ishikawa 923-1292, Japan.
E-mail address: dam@jaist.ac.jp (D.H Chi).
Contents lists available atSciVerse ScienceDirect
Chemical Physics
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w e l s e v i e r c o m / l o c a t e / c h e m p h y s
Trang 2hydrogen bond, while gCenterSi(r) shows a peak at approximately
3.3 Å of the Si atom in a hydrogen bond The results indicate a
sig-nificant contribution of hydrogen bonds to the structure of the CPS
liquid system Further, we believe that the hydrogen bonds
inves-tigated in this study play a key role in the reactions in CPS solution
2 Calculation method
It is well known that DFT calculations involve low
computa-tional costs; however, they fails in describing the intermolecular
interaction that is mainly driven by dispersion forces The
calcula-tion results strongly depend on the employed
exchange–correla-tion funcexchange–correla-tionals employed Local density approximaexchange–correla-tion (LDA) for
exchange–correlation functionals has been reported to
overesti-mate the intermolecular interaction, whereas generalized gradient
approximation (GGA) functionals underestimate it [16,30,19]
Therefore, in this study, in order to select appropriate calculation
methods for evaluating the interaction between CPS molecules,
the interaction between 2 CPS molecules was evaluated using the
HF method and DFT methods with various functionals, including
the LDA–VWN functional, the GGA–PBE functional, and the hybrid
B3LYP functional The results were compared with those of the
MP2 method The calculations were performed using Dmol3code
[3,4]and Gaussian 03 code[8]
The interaction between CPS molecules was described on the
basis of potential energy surfaces (PES) The PES were calculated
by changing the distance between the centers of mass of the two
CPS molecules The binding energies between these two CPS
mol-ecules were estimated by the depth of the potential well on the
PES The reference potential energies were chosen as the total
en-ergy of the two CPS molecules system with a separation of 10 Å
Fig 1shows typical PES for the interaction between two CPS
mol-ecules, calculated using Dmol3code and Gaussian 03 code These
PES were calculated for the configuration in which the two CPS
molecules are aligned nearly parallel to each other (configuration
A in the later discussion and Fig 3) Among molecular orbital
methods, the HF method predicts the repulsive interaction
be-tween CPS molecules, whereas the MP2 method predicts the
attraction between CPS molecules, as shown in Fig 1 It implies
that the correlation effect plays an important role in the interaction
between CPS molecules because the MP2 theory has been reported
to recover 80–90% of the correlation effect[12]
The same tendency is observed for DFT calculations because the
prediction of the interaction between CPS molecules strongly
de-pends on the employed exchange–correlation functionals The
GGA–PBE functional calculations and the hybrid B3LYP functional
calculations predict a weak interaction between CPS molecules, whereas the LDA–VWN functional calculations predict an attrac-tion The VWN-functional with the standard double numerical plus polarization function (DNP) formulated in Dmol3code predicts a binding energy of 0.507 eV and an equilibrium distance between the CPS molecules of 4.25 Å, while the VWN functional with the standard 6-311G⁄⁄basis set formulated in the Gaussian 03 code predicts the binding energy of 0.579 eV and the equilibrium dis-tance between CPS molecules of 4.20 Å The MP2 calculation with the 6-311G⁄⁄basis set formulated in the Gaussian 03 code predicts
a binding energy of 0.437 eV and an equilibrium distance between CPS molecules of 4.55 Å Although the LDA–VWN functional slightly overestimates the binding energy and underestimates the equilibrium distance between CPS molecules, it is clearly seen that the results of the LDA–VWN functional are in reasonable agree-ment with those of the MP2 theory calculations, as shown in
Fig 1 Therefore, the LDA–VWN functional can be used to simulate the interaction between CPS molecules
The interactions of CPS molecules were investigated using DFT molecular dynamics (MD) simulations (Born–Oppenheimer MD simulations) The LDA–VWN functional describes well the interac-tion between two CPS molecules; hence the simulainterac-tions were car-ried out using the LDA–VWN functional with DNP basis set formulated in the Dmol3code The simulations were carried out within microcanonical ensemble for 10 ps with the time step of
1 fs Minimum energy structures derived from the simulations were fully relaxed for reaching more accurate minimum energy structures All optimizations were calculated using the LDA–VWN functional, the GGA–PBE functional, the hybrid B3LYP functional, and MP2 the method along with standard 6-311G⁄⁄basis set for-mulated in Gaussian 03 code
For ab initio MD simulations of liquid CPS with a supercell con-taining 27 CPS molecules, we employed the Car–Parrinello method formulated in CPMD code[1,2] The fictitious mass of electrons was
500 au which enables us to integrate equations of motion with time step of 0.121 fs and to maintain the adiabaticity of the simu-lations The total length of simulation is 10 ps, and the result of the last 5 ps was used for the analysis The computations were per-formed only at theCpoint of the Brillouin zone We used ultra-soft pseudo-potentials[29]with a plane wave cutoff of 30 Ry The LDA functional with a Pade form for the exchange correlation energy optimized by S Goedecker, M Teter, and J Hutterin[9]is applied This functional was tested by calculations of the interactions be-tween 2 CPS molecules The results are in a good agreement with MP2 and LDA–VWN functional calculations We have used a super-cell with a side length of 19.123 Å Such a supersuper-cell size represent CPS under ambient conditions at density of 0.963 g cm1
3 Electronic structure of isolated CPS molecule
In a recent report we presented the results of ab initio studies of
an isolated a CPS molecule with three stable configurations[5] We found that the twist configuration of CPS molecule with the C2 symmetry is the most stable, even though the differences in energy
of the three configurations is quite small, i.e, < 0.1 eV
As in the case of other silane compounds, the delocalization of molecular orbitals (MOs) i.e., conjugation ofrorbitals,[15,27]is
an important characteristic of CPS.Fig 2shows the lowest unoccu-pied molecular orbital (LUMO) and highest occuunoccu-pied molecular orbital (HOMO) of CPS molecule The LUMO appears similar to the lowestp-bonding orbital of the Si penta-ring, but it shows nodes at the center of SiAH bonds This can, therefore, be seen as
an anti-bonding orbital from conjugatedp-orbitals of the penta-ring and s-orbitals of the hydrogen atoms in a CPS molecule On the other hand, the HOMO is an anti-bonding molecular orbital
Trang 3from ar-orbital of Si atoms with s-orbitals of a specific pair of
hydrogen atoms The shape of the LUMO strongly suggests a mode
of interaction between MOs of two molecules in the liquid phase as
the mutual delocalization of MOs[6,20], in which the molecules
that constitute the LUMO act as electron acceptors
4 Intermolecular interaction between CPS molecules
All the typical configurations of a system that consists of two
CPS molecules with minimum energy are searched using first
prin-ciples molecular dynamic simulations The obtained configurations
are shown inFig 3 These configurations were fully relaxed for
reaching more accurate minimum energy configurations The
bind-ing energies were calculated usbind-ing Eq.(1)
in which ECPSis the total energy of an isolated CPS molecule with
the twist configuration, and E2CPSis the total energy of the system
consists of two CPS molecules The optimization calculations were
carried out using Gaussian 03 package The obtained results are
summarized inTable 1
According to the LDA–VWN and MP2 calculations, configuration
A and configuration B are significantly more stable than the
remaining configurations, as seen inTable 1 The binding energy
and the equilibrium distance between the CPS molecules in
config-uration A, which are given by LDA–VWN with the 6-311G⁄⁄basis
set, are approximately 0.481 eV and 4.19 Å, respectively, while
those given by the MP2/6-311G⁄⁄ calculations are 0.440 eV and
4.53 Å, respectively In comparison with MP2, the GGA–PBE
func-tional and hybrid B3LYP funcfunc-tional calculations show a weak
inter-action between CPS molecules This further confirms that GGA
functionals fail to represent weak interactions
One can clearly see that the binding energies strongly depend
on the number of SiAH bonds that are oriented toward the centers
of the rings of other CPS molecule In the case of configuration A, two SiAH bonds of two CPS molecules are oriented toward the cen-ter of the ring of each molecule In the case of configuration B, only one SiAH bond of a CPS molecule is oriented toward the ring of the other CPS molecule In contrast, no SiAH bond is oriented toward the ring of another CPS molecule in the case of configurations C and D; however the SiAH bond is oriented toward the SiASi bond
of the other CPS molecule From this result, we can suggest that the
SiAH bonds that are oriented toward the center of the ring or the
SiASi bond of the other CPS molecule plays a crucial role in the interaction between CPS molecules
In order to gain an insight into the nature of the interaction be-tween CPS molecules and the role of SiAH bonds that are oriented toward the center of the ring of a CPS molecule in the interaction, electronic structures of these configurations were analyzed The deformation of the electron density distribution of two CPS mole-cules approaching each other was calculated by using Eq.(2)
whereq2CPSis the electron density of the two interacting CPS mol-ecules;qCPS1andqCPS2are electron densities of the two isolated CPS molecules The cross sections of the deformation of the electron density distribution of two mutually interacting CPS molecules in configurations A, B, C, and D are shown inFig 4 A significant defor-mation of the electron density can be found in the area between CPS molecules, as compared to the original electron density distribution
of the isolated molecules For configuration A and configuration B,
we can see the special deformation in electron density in the area where SiAH bonds is oriented toward the center of the CPS rings
It is clearly seen that electron density decreases at the center of the SiAH bonds and increases in the area between the H atom of the SiAH bonds and the center of the penta-rings The existence
of such areas implies that a significant bi-directional charge transfer between two CPS molecules has occured The shape of the deforma-tion of electron density shown inFig 4suggests that there is charge transfer from SiAHr-bonding orbitals to the LUMO of CPS mole-cues A similar phenomenon has also observed for the well-estab-lished case of hydrogen bonds in others systems[20,24] Further, from the viewpoint of MO theory, we can explain this result by a significant overlapping between the electronic states the molecules
or the delocalization of MOs[6,20]
A These wavefunctions may be assigned to the bonding state and anti-bonding states that arise from the overlapping of the molecu-lar orbitals of the two molecules.Fig 5(a) clearly shows that the sign of the wavefunction does not change along the line connecting two molecules, while inFig 5(b), the sign of wavefunction changes along this line This result confirms the suggestion that the mode of interaction between orbitals of two CPS molecules is the mutual delocalization between the HOMO and LUMO It should be noted that the such a picture is not observed in the case of two cyclopen-tane (C5H10) molecules in the similar configurations No significant deformation of the electron density distribution is observed in the region between cyclopentane molecules
In the cases of configurations C and D the deformation of elec-tron density distribution is much smaller than that in the cases of configurations A and B The SiAH bonds that are oriented toward the center of the rings, therefore, significantly enhance the overlap-ping of electronic states of CPS molecules in the configurations A and B We can hence suggest that the interaction between two CPS molecules in which the SiAH bond of one molecule is oriented toward the center of the other CPS molecule constitutes a local bond and the SiAH bond acts as an electron donor to the other
Fig 2 The LUMO and the HOMO of a CPS molecule: the red part is the positive part,
and the blue part is the negative part (For interpretation of the references to colour
in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig 3 Typical minimum structures extracted from first principles molecular
dynamics.
Trang 4CPS molecule This interaction is similar to the well-known weak
hydrogen bond with p proton acceptors or electron donnors
(p= benzene ring, C„C triple bond, C@C double bond, Py, Im)
[24] However, the bond energies of such hydrogen bonds
(65 meV[28]) are much smaller than those of the interactions
be-tween CPS molecules (0.5 eV) The interaction bebe-tween CPS
mol-ecules can therefore be considered as ‘‘hydrogen bond’’ between
SiAH bonds and penta-rings of CPS molecules It should be noted
that the suggestion about the mode of interaction between orbitals
of two CPS molecules being the mutual delocalization between
LU-MOs and occupied orbitals is well consistent with the model of a
hydrogen bond in which the penta-ring of CPS the serves as an
electron acceptor Further, the symmetry of the deformation of
the electron density distribution with the bonding state and the
anti-bonding state suggests that the formation of hydrogen bonds
between the CPS molecules can be attributed to the overlapping
between ther orbital corresponding to the SiAH bond, electron
donor, and the LUMO of the remaining CPS molecule, electron acceptor This is similar to the concept ofr-conjugation in silane compounds in which the overlapping ofrSiASi orbitals was used
to explain the optical properties and photochemistry of oligomeric silanes[15,26,21]
The fact that the hydrogen bonds are induced by the SiAH bonds that are oriented toward the center of the ring of a CPS mol-ecule can be inferred as the reason for the relatively high boiling points of cyclopentasilane and cyclohexasilane as compared to those of silanes with the comparable molecular mass As shown
inTable 2 [10], the melting points of n-Si5H12and iso-Si5H12are
72.8 °C and 109.8 °C, respectively, while those of CPS and cyclo-hexasilane are 10.5 °C and +16.5 °C, respectively A similar ten-dency is observed for the boiling point data in Table 2 This implies that the hydrogen bonds formed by the SiAH bonds ori-ented toward the center of the CPS ring may play a significant role
in the interaction between CPS molecules and also between cyclo-hexasilane molecules in their liquid and solid states
It is well known that in the water, the hydrogen bonds strongly modify the infrared (IR) spectrum of single water molecules; the hydrogen bonds broaden and red-shift the peaks corresponding
to the OAH stretch vibration of the OAH bond To confirm this
Table 1
The binding energies [DE (eV)] and the equilibrium distances between the centers of mass of the two CPS molecules [D e (Å)].
6-311G ⁄⁄
aug-cc-pvdz 6-311G ⁄⁄
aug-cc-pvdz 6-311G ⁄⁄
aug-cc-pvdz 6-311G ⁄⁄
aug-cc-pvdz
-Fig 4 Cross section of the deformation of electron density distribution.
Fig 5 Bonding state (HOMO-4, 0.3 eV below HOMO level) (a) and anti-bonding
state of (LUMO) (b) of hydrogen bonds of 2 CPS molecules.
Table 2 Melting point (MT) and boiling point (BP) data of certain silane compounds [10]
Frequency (cm -1 )
NVE 400K 500K CPS
1800 1900 2000 2100
Fig 6 IR spectra of liquid CPS calculated from molecular dynamic simulations Magenta line corresponds to the IR spectrum of a single CPS molecule.
Trang 5property, we carried out a frequency analysis of a 2 CPS molecules
system (by analytical methods) Our analysis result shows that the
stretch vibration of the SiAH bonds that get involved into
hydro-gen bonds significantly shifts in the red direction from that of
the single CPS molecule This implies that the formation of
hydro-gen bonds also modifies the stretch vibration of SiAH bonds This
similarity to the water system provides further evidence of the
for-mation of hydrogen bonds between CPS molecules The calculation
of IR spectrum from molecular dynamics simulation shows the
same result as shown inFig 6
5 Structural and bonding properties of liquid CPS
We have carried out first principle molecular dynamics
simula-tions of liquid CPS with a system of 27 CPS molecules The
struc-ture of liquid CPS is characterized using pair correlation radial
distribution functions (RDFs) between the center of mass (CM) of
CPS molecules and silicon (gCenterSi(r)) and those between the
CM of the CPS molecules and hydrogen gCenterH(r) The main
pur-pose of the simulations is to evaluate the hydrogen bond to the
structure of liquid CPS
We compared the computed RDFs of the liquid system with the
geometrical structure of a single CPS molecule.Fig 7(a) and (b)
show the obtained pair correlation RDFs gCenterH(r) and gCenterSi(r),
respectively, of the liquid system
The gCenterH(r) function of a simulation for a pseudo-liquid
structure at 50 K exhibits a pronounced peak located at
approxi-mately 2.1 Å, which does not correspond to any structure of a
sin-gle CPS molecule This peak can be attributed to the hydrogen
atoms that are involved in the hydrogen bonds (SiAH bonds of which are oriented toward the center of the ring of the CPS mole-cule), as discussed earlier At 300 K, this peak becomes a shoulder
of a high peak located at 3.0 Å These results suggest that the ther-mal motion of molecules at high temperatures weaken the hydro-gen bonds A detailed analysis shows that the ratio between the number of H atoms involved in the hydrogen bonds and the num-ber of CPS molecules is nearly 1:1 This is a clear evidence of the formation of the hydrogen bond in the liquid phase of CPS Since the structure of CPS molecules is not ideally planar, the hydrogen atoms are at different distances from the center of mass
of a molecule, ranging from 2.6 Å to 3.3 Å The peaks appearing in the range of 2.6–3.4 Å, therefore, arise from these hydrogen atoms Our analysis confirms that each CPS molecule has 10 hydrogen atoms within this range A broad peak is observed around 5.0 Å
at 300 K At 50 K, this peak decomposes into three peaks located
at 4.4 Å, 5.3 Å, and 5.8 Å For a single CPS molecule, no peaks exist
in this range These peaks, hence, correspond to the distances from the center of mass of one CPS molecule to hydrogen atoms of its neighboring CPS molecule in the configurations A and B, as shown
inFig 3
An analysis of gCenterSi(r) of the liquid system was carried out in the same manner gCenterSi(r) exhibits a sharp peak at approxi-mately 2.1 Å, which corresponds to the distance from the center
of mass of a CPS molecule to its Si atoms We can also observe broad peaks in the range of 3.5–5.5 Å These peaks can be assigned
to the contribution of the Si atoms of a neighboring CPS molecules that are involved in the hydrogen bonds (SiAH bonds of which are oriented to the center of the ring of the CPS molecule) in configu-rations A and B The results of the simulations for the liquid sys-tem, therefore, have a good correspondence with those for two CPS molecules, previously presented The most important finding
in the simulations is the significant role of hydrogen bonds in the structure of the liquid system
6 Conclusion Ab-initio calculations were carried out to investigate the inter-actions between CPS molecules, and the structure of liquid CPS The simulations were carried out by using DFT methods, HF meth-ods, and MP2 methods formulated in the Dmol3code and the G03 package We found that the SiAH bonds that are oriented toward the center of the ring of a CPS molecule play a significant role in the interaction between CPS molecules as these bonds enhance the overlapping of the electronic states of the CPS molecules This interaction results in the formation of special bonds between CPS molecules which resemble hydrogen bonds These hydrogen bonds cause the red shift of IR absorption peaks corresponding to the
SiAH stretch vibration The pair correlation radial distribution function gCenterH(r) shows a peak at approximately 2.0 Å, which
is attributed to the hydrogen atom involved in the hydrogen bond, while gCenterSi(r) shows a peak at approximately 3.3 Å of the Si atom in a hydrogen bond The results show that hydrogen bonds have a significant contribution to the structure of the CPS liquid system The hydrogen bonds found in this study are considered
to play a key role in the reactions in CPS solution
References
[1] R Car, M Parrinello, Phys Rev Lett 55 (1985) 2471.
[2] CPMD, <http://www.cpmd.org/> , 2011.
[3] B Delley, Chem Phys 92 (1990) 508.
[4] B Delley, Chem Phys 113 (2000) 7756.
[5] P.V Dung et al., J Comput Mater Sci 49 (2010) S21.
[6] K Fukui, Science 218 (1982) 747.
[7] M Furusawa, SID International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, Society
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00
gCenter-H
CPS
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00
gCenter-Si
CPS
0.00 1.50 3.00
3.00 4.50 6.00
(a)
(b)
Fig 7 Pair correlation radial distribution functions: Center of mass of CPS
molecules and hydrogen (a), center of mass of CPS molecules and silicon (b) Red
lines corresponds to the pair correlation radial distribution functions of a single CPS
molecule (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the
Trang 6[8] Gaussian 03, Revision B.01, M.J Frisch, G.W Trucks, H.B Schlegel, G.E Scuseria,
M.A Robb, J.R Cheeseman, J.A Montgomery, Jr., T Vreven, K.N Kudin, J.C.
Burant, J.M Millam, S.S Iyengar, J Tomasi, V Barone, B Mennucci, M Cossi, G.
Scalmani, N Rega, G.A Petersson, H Nakatsuji, M Hada, M Ehara, K Toyota, R.
Fukuda, J Hasegawa, M Ishida, T Nakajima, Y Honda, O Kitao, H Nakai, M.
Klene, X Li, J.E Knox, H.P Hratchian, J.B Cross, C Adamo, J Jaramillo, R.
Gomperts, R.E Stratmann, O Yazyev, A.J Austin, R Cammi, C Pomelli, J.W.
Ochterski, P.Y Ayala, K Morokuma, G.A Voth, P Salvador, J.J Dannenberg, V.G.
Zakrzewski, S Dapprich, A.D Daniels, M.C Strain, O Farkas, D.K Malick, A.D.
Rabuck, K Raghavachari, J.B Foresman, J.V Ortiz, Q Cui, A.G Baboul, S.
Clifford, J Cioslowski, B.B Stefanov, G Liu, A Liashenko, P Piskorz, I.
Komaromi, R.L Martin, D.J Fox, T Keith, M.A Al-Laham, C.Y Peng, A.
Nanayakkara, M Challacombe, P.M.W Gill, B Johnson, W Chen, M.W.Wong,
C Gonzalez, J.A Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA., 2003.
[9] S Goedecker, M Teter, J Hutter, Phys Rev B 54 (1996) 1703.
[10] N Greenwood, A Earnshaw, Chemistry of the Elements,
Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997.
[11] P Hohenberg, W Kohn, Phys Rev 136 (1964) 5188.
[12] Kohanoff, Electroic structure calculations for solides and molecules.
Cambridge, 2006.
[13] W Kohn, L.J Sham, Phys Rev 140 (1965) 1133.
[14] Miyashita, S., The 21st International Display Research Conference in
Conjunction with 8th International Display Workshop (Asia Display/ IDW
f01), 2001, pp 1399–1402.
[15] Nalwa H.S., Hand book of Photochemistry and photobiology, vol 1, American scientific, 2003.
[16] Y Okamoto, Y Miyamoto, Phys Chem B 105 (2001) 3470.
[17] S Okamura, R Takeuchi, T Shiozaki, Jpn J Appl Phys 41 (2002) 6714 [18] P Peumans, S Uchida, S.R Forrest, Nature 425 (2003) 158.
[19] T.L Pham et al., COMMAT 49 (2010) s15.
[20] A.E Reed, L.A Curtiss, F Weinhold, Chem Rev 88 (1988) 899.
[21] C Sandorly, Can J Chem 33 (1955) 1337.
[22] Shimoda, T., 1999 SID International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, Society for Information Display, San Jose, 1999, 376–379.
[23] T Shimoda, Y Matsuki, M Furusawa, T Aoki, I Yudasaka, H Tanaka, H Iwasawa, D Wang, M Miyasaka, Y Takeuchi, Nature 440 (2006) 783 [24] T Steiner, Angew Chem Int Ed 41 (2002) 48.
[25] R.B.H Tahar, T Ban, Y Ohya, Y Takahashi, J Appl Phys 82 (1997) 865 [26] K Takeda et al., Acta Chemica Scandinavica 108 (1985) 8186.
[27] J.R.G Thorne, S.A Williams, R.M Hochstrasser, P.J Fagan, Chem Phys 157 (1991) 401.
[28] S Tsuzuki, K Honda, T Uchimaru, M Mikami, K Tanabe, Am Chem Soc 122 (2000) 11450.
[29] D Vanderbilt, Phys Rev B 41 (1990) 7892.
[30] M Vanin et al., PRB 81 (2010) 08140.
[31] Yudasaka, I., Tanaka, H., Miyasaka, M., Inoue, S., Shimoda, T., SID International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, Society for Information Display, San Jose, 2004, pp 964–967.