The BEACON Better Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain with Computed Tomography Angiography, n= 500 pts... MEDIC Coronary CT Angiography for Suspected ACS The BEACON Better Evaluation of Acut
Trang 1Emerging Roles of MSCT for Patient with
Acute Chest Pain
Bs CK II Nguyễn Xuân Trình
Bs Phan Thanh Hải
Department of Cardiology MEDIC Medical Center
MEDIC
Trang 2Acute Chest Pain(ACP) And the ED
2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation
• Several cardiac and non-cardiac conditions may mimic NSTE-ACS
• Differential diagnosis of NSTE-ACS:
• Aortic dissection,
• Pulmonary embolism
Trang 3MEDIC
Acute Coronary Syndrome and the ED
• 8-10 million ED chest pain presentations/ yr in US
• 85-95% have a final diagnosis other than MI or UA
• Unnecessary admissions (60-80%) and testing to exclude ACS
• But, big downside for missed diagnosis (up to 5%)
• General agreement in USA, <1% miss rate is needed
• Clinical exam, risk factors, and markers can’t do it
Harold Litt Available online at www.nasci.org
Udo Hoffmann Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:251-263
Trang 4MEDIC
Goals for ED ACP Evaluation
• Exclude or diagnose causes with morbidity if untreated
• Discharge safely if negative - Sens, NPV
Goal is <1% 30-day event rate
• Provide good “warranty period” for negative evaluation
• Provide risk assessment for outpatient treatment
• Do it efficiently and as cheaply as possible
Harold Litt Available online at www.nasci.org
Trang 5MEDIC
Trang 6Coro CTA in Acute Chest Pain and ED
Trang 7MEDIC
Cardiac MSCT as the Solution
• Single center trials (some large):
- CT is safe (<1% 30-day event rate )
- CT is efficient (8-12 hrs vs 24 hrs usual care)
- CT costs less ($250 - $2500 savings per pt)
- CT reduces repeat ED visits and readmissions
• Multicenter trials:
– CT-STAT – ACRIN PA 4005 and ROMICAT II – Why does CT work? It acts as a surrogate for cath
– ED physicians and patients believe the results
Harold Litt Available online at www.nasci.org
Trang 8(American College of Radiology Imaging Network / Pennsylvania Department of Health)
Multicenter randomized, controlled Trial
N=1,370 patients
Trang 9MEDIC
(n=501)
Standard Evaluation
(n=499)
P- Value
Missed ACS /72h 0% 0%
28-day MACE (Safety) 0.4% 1.0% 0.37
ED Costs of care 2053 2532 < 0.0001
ROMICAT II
Udo Hoffmann et al N Engl J Med 2012 Jul 26; 367(4): 299–308
• N = 1000 pts low-intermediate risk patients
• CCTA (n=501) vs Standard Evaluation(n= 499)
Trang 10MEDIC
J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67(1):16-26
The BEACON (Better Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain with Computed Tomography Angiography), n= 500 pts
Trang 11MEDIC
Coronary CT Angiography for Suspected ACS
The BEACON (Better Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain with Computed Tomography Angiography), n= 500 pts
J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67(1):16-26
Trang 12MEDIC
Coronary CT Angiography for Suspected ACS
The BEACON (Better Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain with Computed Tomography Angiography), n= 500 pts
J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67(1):16-26
Trang 13MEDIC
Smulders et al Am Heart J July 2016; Vol 177:102-11
Trang 14MEDIC
Smulders et al Am Heart J July 2016; Vol 177:102-11
Trang 15MEDIC
Trang 16Rybicki et al Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Imaging in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13:e1-e29
Trang 17MEDIC
Rybicki et al Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Imaging in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13:e1-e29
Trang 18MEDIC
Imaging of Patients for Whom the Initial Workup Is Diagnostic for STEMI or Noncardiac
Rybicki et al Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Imaging in Emergency
Department Patients With Chest Pain J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13:e1-e29
Trang 19MEDIC
Suspected Non–ST-Segment Elevation ACS:
Early Assessment Pathway Based on Initial ECG, Biomarker Analysis, and Symptoms
Rybicki et al Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Imaging in Emergency
Department Patients With Chest Pain J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13:e1-e29
Trang 20MEDIC
Suspected Non–ST-Segment Elevation ACS:
Observational Pathway—After Assessment of Serial Cardiac Troponin
Rybicki et al Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Imaging in Emergency
Department Patients With Chest Pain J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13:e1-e29
Trang 21MEDIC
Suspected PE
Rybicki et al Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Imaging in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13:e1-e29
Trang 22MEDIC Suspected AAS
Rybicki et al Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Imaging in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13:e1-e29
Trang 23MEDIC
Rybicki et al Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Imaging in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13:e1-e29
Trang 24MEDIC
CONCLUSION: CCTA in the ACP
• CCTA has a high sensitivity (98-100%), Specificity 85% , NPV 100%
• Hs- Troponin is highly sensitive but less specific
• Appropriate indications of CCTA :
CCTA as first test for low-intermediate risk pts with potential ACS
Safety: 30-day MACE < 1%
Efficiency
Lower ED costs of care
Equivocal initial diagnosis of NSTEMI/ACS
Serial troponins or ECG not positive for NSTEMI/ACS
strategies for the management of patients with ACP
Trang 25MEDIC