Ultrasonic assistance offered lower feed force and higher process temperatures as compared to conventional drilling.. Recently, ultrasonic vibration has been applied as a process assisti
Trang 1Analysis of ultrasonic-assisted drilling of Ti6Al4V
J Pujanaa, A Riveroa, A Celayab, L.N Lo´pez de Lacalleb,
a
Fundacio ´n Fatronik, Paseo Mikeletegi 7, 20009 Donostia-San Sebastia ´n, Spain
b
Departamento de Ingenierı´a Meca ´nica de la Escuela Superior de Ingenieros de Bilbao, Universidad del Paı´s Vasco, Alameda de Urquijo s/n, E-48013 Bilbao, Spain
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 25 September 2008
Received in revised form
22 December 2008
Accepted 23 December 2008
Available online 20 January 2009
Keywords:
Ti6Al4V
Ultrasonic-assisted drilling
Cutting temperature
Machining
a b s t r a c t
In this study ultrasonic vibration was applied on the drilling of Ti6Al4V workpiece samples Several parameters of ultrasonic-assisted drilling were monitored, including feed force, chip formation by means of high-speed imaging, and temperature measurement on the drill tip by means of infrared radiation thermometry Ultrasonic assistance offered lower feed force and higher process temperatures
as compared to conventional drilling It has also shown higher force reductions and higher temperature increments when vibration amplitude was increased
&2009 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved
1 Introduction
The widespread use of titanium alloys both in structural and
corrosion-resistant applications is well known There is growing
interest concerning the process ability of titanium alloys since
they exhibit a good compromise between density and yield
strength and also have good creep and fatigue resistance at mid
temperatures The Ti6Al4V alloy is inside thea+bphase alloys,
and it is most widely used among the different titanium alloys
employed in aerospace industry [1] Their characteristics allow
lightweight structures to be achieved at temperatures above
600 1C[2]
Nowadays, there has been a growing interest and tendency to
employ more friendly processing techniques In the machining
process, minimum use of lubricant and dry machining are
good solutions for reducing the wastage, but the lack or
reduction of cutting fluid tends to derive into problems associated
with heat generation and chip removal These problems become
more prominent when dealing with titanium Low thermal
conductivity and good thermal resistance make machining of
titanium, especially drilling[3,4] The fact being that temperature
is the major wear factor on coated tools being tested on dry
drilling experiments[5], the US-assisted drilling of Ti6Al4V alloy
is a prospective alternative to fluid-assisted cutting where
achieved temperatures will be lower than those achieved by
conventional drilling
The use of ultrasonic vibration in different manufacturing processes is well documented for more than 50 years [6] Ultrasonic machining has been mainly applied on brittle materi-als, and although removal rates are not high, ultrasonic technol-ogy suits very well this type of material Recently, ultrasonic vibration has been applied as a process assisting conventional machining operations (turning and drilling) instead of the vibro-impact regime of the ultrasonic movement being the main cutting mechanism This technique is called ultrasonic machining (USM)
or rotary ultrasonic machining (RUM) [7] Process assistance involves applying the ultrasonic technology in the machining of non-brittle and difficult-to-cut materials[8] Assisted ultrasonic machining has been proven to be an efficient technique for improving the machinability of several aeronautic materials such
as aluminum [9,10] or Inconel 718 [11] Chip breaking, burr generation, workpiece roughness, tool life or torque and cutting forces are some parameters studied with vibration applied in conventional cutting processes[12–14]
Although some researchers have observed chip fragmentation
in materials such as inconel[11,14] or aluminum [15,16] when ultrasonic vibration was applied in the drilling process, some others did not address the chip-breaking effect either in drilling
[8]or turning[17] However, the mechanism that produced chip segmentation has not been well explained Regarding chip segmentation and serrated chip formation, catastrophic shear failure and adiabatic shear forming mechanisms are considered the main causes[18] At this point, difficulties associated with the determination of appropriate constitutive equations[19,20]and the establishment of adequate failure modes [21] of titanium alloys in simpler laboratory and orthogonal cutting tests limit the
Contents lists available atScienceDirect
journal homepage:www.elsevier.com/locate/ijmactool
International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture
0890-6955/$ - see front matter & 2009 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.
Corresponding author Tel./fax: +94 6014216.
E-mail address: implomal@bi.ehu.es (L.N Lo´pez de Lacalle).
Trang 2understanding of more complex material behaviors encountered
in drilling operations
There might be two reasons for chip breaking when vibration is
superimposed on the drilling process The first one is purely
geometrical: due to the periodic nature of tool vibration and its
spin, chip breaking is dependent on tool vibration amplitude
calculated on the phase shift between vibratory motion and tool
spinning frequency Therefore, the vibration amplitude A which is
necessary to achieve segmented chips is given according to[22]
4A
f ¼
1
where A indicates vibration amplitude, f feed per revolution and
Wfthe number of vibration cycles per tool revolution.Fig 1shows
the chip-breaking area (above each set of points) and
non-chip-breaking area (below) and curves generated with feeds ranging
from 10 to 100mm have been drawn
In ultrasonic-assisted machining, it is almost necessary to work
in a resonant vibration state of the tool if high amplitudes have to
be achieved[23] When vibro-impact regimes are reached, there is
a non-linear type force acting on the tool and the system tends to
have unstable resonant states Auto-resonant control strategies
are used to tune phase shift in addition to frequency by means of a
closed-loop control system[24,25]
The second reason for segmented chip formation is the
strain–stress state of the material The analysis and study of chip
formation in Ti6Al4V has been long reported[26], but it is still not
clear which conditions generate serrated chip Several theories
have been formulated to explain the non-homogeneous chip
formation assuming different crack initiation criteria and different
crack initiation regions The first theory addressed the
cata-strophic shear instability in machining due to slope of the true
stress–true strain curve reaching of zero However, several of the
modern theories are based on adiabatic shear theory, a more
prominent thermal softening than the strain hardening effect of
the material, or crack initiation due to surface irregularities[27]
In the case of Ti6Al4V, segmented chip formation occurs as a
consequence of adiabatic shear leading to a large strain concen-tration in a narrow band [26] Due to the low thermal conductivity, all the heat generated concentrates on the shear band If temperature in the shear band is high enough, heat generation also might increase due to the possibility of allotropic transformation in titanium[18] Recently, the use of simulation by finite element method (FEM)-based software permits the predic-tion and recreapredic-tion of severely deformed shear bands [19] and serrated chip morphology[20] In this case, the results obtained are directly dependent on the employed material’s flow stress, but aspects such as surface cracks, phase transformations, disconti-nuities and allotropic transformations are not yet taken into account
Regarding tool wear, research indicates that ultrasonic-assisted machining yields longer tool lives There is evidence of maximum vibration amplitude over which tool life shortens
as a consequence of the impact regime reached [14] Similar working mechanism exists in modulation-assisted machining (MAM) [28] for particulate powder production This research group has also investigated the use of vibrating tools in drilling and turning operations where tools with high amplitudes
in the range 100–200mm were employed with notorious improvements in tool life especially concerning deep drilling operations This apparent contradiction might be due to the huge difference in the number of impact-cutting cycles between the tool and the workpiece on both techniques; while
in ultrasonic-assisted machining, working frequencies are of the order of 20 kHz, in the case of MAM, these are of the order
of 100 Hz
This study aims to analyze the effect ultrasonic assistance has
on the drilling of Ti6Al4V alloy To our knowledge, no study has been reported in the literature on applying ultrasonic assistance
to the drilling process in order to achieve more favorable cutting conditions Here, aspects such as measurement of force, high-speed imaging of chip formation and temperature measurement
of the drill will be studied in order to analyze the material behaviors
Trang 32 Experimental investigation
The experimental investigation of this work has been divided
into several aspects beginning with the construction of an
ultrasonic vibration device and then the monitoring of the drilling
process, including its feed force and temperature measurements
Titanium alloy Ti6Al4V was drilled in the aged condition, with
mechanical properties su 1100 MPa, hardness 41 HRC and
modulus of elasticity 114 GPa
2.1 Vibration system
In this study, ultrasonic vibration has been applied over
Ti6Al4V samples supplied by the Airbus aeronautic manufacturer
The samples were 3 mm thick with a diameter of 55 mm We
employed the two-flute uncoated tungsten carbide Gu¨hring drills
with a diameter of 4 mm, ref A2 2120 according to the DIN 338
standard
Ultrasonic vibration has been achieved by means of
a piezoelectric transducer, MPI 5020S-6PS, and a power
generator, MastersonicTM MSG-2000, which works in the
17.5–27.5 kHz frequency range The transducer was attached to
the aluminum cylindrical workpiece clamp The exact
vibration frequency yielding an axial vibration mode was
calculated using the FEM Nastran-PatranTM software
package The samples’ vibration control was measured using a
Polytec OFV 505 laser head and a PolytecTMOFV-5000 vibrometer
controller Fig 2 shows the US vibration system with details
of the clamping system and FEM modeling of the 17,688 Hz
axial vibration mode
According to the axial vibration analysis, FEM simulations
result in good agreement with experimentally measured
fre-quency values Amplitudes achieved were of the range 3–9mm
depending on the tuning frequencies of the system
As shown inFig 3, there are three vibrating stages In the first
stage, there is no tool–workpiece interaction In the second stage,
the drilling process starts, and due to the deflection of the
workpiece clamping system, a jump in the measured amplitude
can be observed in the graph In the third stage, the process stabilizes while the drill cuts the material In cases when the drilling feeds are of the order of the ultrasonic vibration amplitude (10–20mm), a vibro-impact working regime can be reached according toFig 1
2.2 Force measurements and chip formation Feed forces were measured using a Kistler 9046B4 dynam-ometer composed of four quartz charge cells.Table 1shows the values of feed force variation when a vibration frequency of 17,700 Hz was applied to the sample at different working conditions The ultrasonic vibration is not recorded by the Kistler plate because this frequency is 20 times higher than the device natural frequency Therefore, the cutting force reduction is related
to the chip formation mechanism, affected by the ultrasonic assistance
Feed force reductions of the order of 20% have been attained when ultrasonic-assisted drilling was employed Higher force reductions have been documented in the literature for different materials [23], but in the present experiments, the working regime has not reached a vibro-impact as might happen elsewhere
A high-speed camera, PhotronTM Ultima APX-RS, was em-ployed for the observation of in-process chip formation The recording rates employed have been of 9000 frames per second (fps) with a shutter frequency of 91,000 Hz halide lighting and a fiber optic system for light guiding have been employed in order
to ensure good image quality Fig 4 shows the images of conventional drilling (left) and ultrasonic-assisted drilling (right)
of Ti6Al4V at a spindle speed of 2000 rpm and a feed rate of
200 mm/rev
According to our images and further optic microscope analysis, slight difference was observed when ultrasonic-assisted and conventional drill produced chips were compared Some geome-trical distortion and chip breakage of chip when US was applied could be mentioned (see Fig 4 right, the extreme case of difference)
Trang 4Regarding the aspects related to chip formation, burr height
has also been analyzed No difference was observed at this point
because these drilling tests have been based on new drills and
short machining time samples Due to this fact and to the very
little worn-out tool edges, burr height was inexistent when
drilling 3-mm thick Ti6Al4V samples using new tools
2.3 Temperature measurements
The thermal analysis of drilling was a key factor because it is
directly related to tool wear and tool life Temperature
measure-ment in drilling was itself a task [4,29–33] With respect to
temperature measurements, some attempts were made with
ultrasonic-assisted turning of Inconel 718[34], but no reference
has been observed in the drilling of Ti6Al4V
For the estimation of temperatures, a thermographic camera,
NikonTMLaird-270 A with a Schottky-Barrier IR charge-coupled
device working in the 3–5mm range, was employed Temperature measurements have been done in two zones The upper zone corresponded to the zone where the drill enters the sample and the lower zone corresponded to the zone where the drill tip exits the sample.Fig 5shows the disposition of the measuring setup of the tool, the sample and the IR camera
Spectral emissivity of the tool for different temperatures
in the normal direction of view was employed according to former investigations over uncoated WC tool samples carried out by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometry
[35,36] Due to its null influence on temperature, a value of spectral emissivity between 0.35 and 0.45 was assumed for hard metal (tungsten carbide sintered with cobalt) in the spectral band corresponding to the camera sensor employed Fig 6
shows the curves of emissivity of WC as a function of temperature and wavelength According to these curves, the measurements of temperatures on WC were more accurate using near infrared sensors than using far infrared sensors because emissivity values at short wavelengths are much higher than at long wavelengths
Temperature can be calculated by equating the relation of radiances between the real body, Ll, and the radiances of the black body, Ll , b, multiplied by the spectral emissivity of the hot body,el:
Expressing the exitances of the hot body in integral form is possible once spectral emissivity and black body temperature, Tb, are known Then the definition of temperature of the real body, T,
is found by solving the next equation
Z l 2
l1
l5
ec 2 = l b1d ¼
Z l 2
l1
ll5
where the first integral expresses the exitance of the black body at
a known temperature, Tb, and the second integral expresses the exitance of the real body;l1andl2indicate the sensing shorter and longer wavelengths; and c2 is a constant with a value of 1.4388 102m K For temperature calculations according to the images acquired with the high-speed camera, we observed
Table 1
Data corresponding to different drilling experiments of Ti6Al4V.
Test Spindle speed,
n (rpm)
Feed, f (mm/min)
US Fz (N) Reduction
(%)
Fig 3 Vibration amplitude measurement employing laser vibrometry at rotation speed n 2000 rpm and feed rate, f, 150 mm/min.
Trang 5that the chip did not interfere with the field of view of the drill.
The image acquisition rate of the thermographic camera was set
to a frequency of 30 Hz According to the emissivity variation due
to viewing angle at different points of the body clearance of the
drill, it was assumed that this value keeps constant and equals
normal emissivity values Aspects such as emissivity variation due
to grease and dust or machined material adhering to the drill have
not been considered here It is also important to note that the
measured temperature did not correspond to the machining
instant but corresponded to a time instant just after finishing the
machining process
The use a 1:1.2 lens that allowed enough spatial resolution in
order to measure temperatures on different areas of the drill
Fig 7 shows two thermographs of the upper view of the drill
where US-assisted and non-assisted drilling temperature fields
are shown
Fig 8shows the thermal field of the drill tip at the exit of the sample drilling process where it is clearly observed that temperatures achieved with US assistance are noticeably higher than that in the case of non-US assistance In conventional drilling, temperatures near 800 K are measured, whereas in US-assisted drilling, temperatures close to 1100 K are measured It makes a differential of 300 K higher when US assistance is employed In both Figs 7 and 8, the white line indicates the border between the sample and the air Consequently, a double image corresponding to the direct radiation and reflected radiation can be observed in both figures Reflected radiation corresponds to the area below the white light inFig 7and above the line inFig 8 Temperatures measured as the tool exited the work sample were higher than temperatures encountered on the tool as the tool entered the material Thus, as an approximation to real temperatures during the drilling process, it was assumed that temperatures at the exit of the tool are more accurate
When temperature measurements were compared to feed forces at different sample vibration amplitudes, it was observed that, whereas temperature increased with tool vibration ampli-tude, feed force decreased as vibration amplitude grew Fig 9
shows the double graph of measured average feed force, Fz, and maximum temperature at the tool tip exit of the sample against vibration amplitude variation
As observed in Fig 9, when no vibration was applied, feed forces lay in 350 N approximately, whereas amplitudes of vibration up to 9mm produced force reductions down to 170 N
In the case of temperatures, a contrary effect was observed When
no US vibration was applied, temperature of the drill tip at the exit
of the work sample was of the order of 750 K, whereas when US vibration of 9mm was applied, this temperature went beyond the limit of the camera filter, which is 823 K for black body radiation Although our results concerning the machining of aluminum were not treated in this work, it has been observed in experimental tests that aluminum 7075-T6 drilling yielded, as in the case of Ti6Al4V, lower feed forces and higher tool temperatures when US-assisted drilling was applied
3 Discussion of results Our results appear to describe the results in some points as confusing compared to those found in literature Temperature
Fig 4 Chip formation of Ti6Al4V without ultrasonic assistance (a, left) and with ultrasonic assistance (b, right).
Fig 5 Schedule of temperature measuring zones on the drill.
Trang 6increment during the cutting process accelerates the diffusion of
the work material into the tool, decreases the hardness of the tool
making it more prone to abrasion and wear, and promotes
thermal softening either in the work or in the tool From one side,
temperature increments are directly related to reductions in tool
life[37, p 515], whereas from the other, some authors indicate
that the application of ultrasonic assistance promotes tool life
[10,11] With respect to the application of ultrasonic assistance on Ti6Al4V, our experiments indicate that a general reduction of feed force occurs parallel to an increase of temperatures, both variables being dependent on vibration amplitude Thus, higher vibration amplitudes yield higher feed force reductions and higher
Fig 6 Emissivity of WC as a function of wavelength (a) and temperature (b).
Fig 7 Thermograms of the drill where (a) there is no US assistance and (b) with US assistance captured at sample entering.
Trang 7temperatures when Ti6Al4V is machined Temperature increment
observed with ultrasonic-assisted drilling is higher than when no
assistance is applied
This experimental evidence confirms the FEM-simulated
results found in the literature[34,38], where ultrasonic-assisted
machining over Inconel 718 test samples presented higher
temperatures than conventional machining samples When
US-assisted drilling was applied, FEM simulations carried out by
Mitrofanov have shown that the mean level of stress in the
primary shear zone was lower than when ultrasonic-assisted
machining was applied [39] Fig 10 shows the curves of flow
stress variation on Ti6Al4V material assuming different
conven-tional drilling and ultrasonic-assisted drilling temperatures
according to Johnson–Cook (Eq (4)) and Zerilli–Armstrong’s (Eq
(5)) flow stress,s, expressions:
s¼A þ Bn
1 þ C ln _
_
0
1 T Troom
TmeltTroom
(4) where A ¼ 782.7 MPa, B ¼ 498.4 MPa, C ¼ 0.028, n ¼ 0.28 and
m ¼ 1 for _0¼105s1 are the constants of Johnson and Cook’s
material flow stress law according to Lee and Lin[40]; Tmeltand
Troomindicate the melting temperature of the material employed
and the room temperature;eis the strain and _¼105s1is the supposed strain rate of the material in the primary shear zone In the case of Zerilli–Armstrong flow stress expression, we have
s¼C0þC1e½C3C4ln _ ð ÞT
þC5n
(5) where C0¼810 MPa, C1¼1800 MPa, C3¼0.009, C4¼0.0005,
C5¼530 MPa and n ¼ 0.5 are specific constants of Zerilli–Arm-strong’s relation for each material[21];sindicates the flow stress value, andeindicates stress strain (0.8)
As shown inFig 10, a thermal softening effect that yields flow stress variations proportional to the observed force reductions is only achieved when it is considered that Ti6Al4V behaves corresponding to the Johnson–Cook model [40] and achieves temperature differences of more than 250 1C If material behavior corresponding to Zerilli–Armstrong is considered[21], variation of flow stress will be under 10% even when conventional and US-assisted drilling chip temperature differences are above 300 K According to these results, suppose that chip temperature in US-assisted drilling is notoriously higher than in conventional drilling, feed force reductions achieved cannot be explained by the thermal softening effect A new look to explain the force reduction
is found by Calamaz et al.[19]where a new model with a TANH (Hyperbolic Tangent) material law is proposed, in which a new term is added to the Johnson and Cook equation to model the strain softening effect
In future investigations, it would be desirable to have the analysis of chip–tool–workpiece contact and tool life analysis in order to better understand the temperature increment source and its effects on the economy and quality of machined parts
4 Conclusion After constructing a US-assisted workpiece holder, drilling of Ti6Al4V was carried out and different parameters were monitored
In situ chip formation was analyzed and no difference was observed with regard to chip geometry Similarly, when new tools were employed in drilling, burr formation was null
When ultrasonic-assisted drilling was applied, the feed force decreased by 10–20% on average, and the decrease in force was more notorious as the vibration amplitude was higher
Fig 8 Thermograms of the drill where (a) there is no US assistance and (b) with
US assistance at the sample exit.
Trang 8Tool tip temperature was higher when ultrasonic-assisted
drilling was applied In this case, the higher the vibration
amplitude, the higher the temperature variations at the
tool tip
There exists a correlation between temperature variation and
feed force variation, but it cannot be explained due to the
thermal softening effect of Ti6Al4V only At this point, it is
necessary to carry out further research in quantifying the
existent heat generation mechanism and its effect on tool wear
and workpiece tensional state (residual stress, phase
transfor-mation, etc.)
Acknowledgements
This research was sponsored by the Basque Government
Project Advance Manufacturing Technologies and coordinated by
the marGUNE Cooperative Research Center Special thanks to
marGUNE researches working on US, especially O Gonzalo and
R Alberdi Thanks are also addressed to Prof Girot, for his valuable
suggestions
References
[1] R.R Boyer, An overview on the use of titanium in the aerospace industry,
Materials Science and Engineering A 213 (1996) 103–114.
[2] L.N Lopez de Lacalle, J Perez, J.I Llorente, J.A Sanchez, Advanced cutting
conditions for the milling of aeronautical alloys, Journal of Materials
Processing Technology 100 (2000) 1–11.
[3] R.P Zeilmann, W.L Weingaertner, Analysis of temperature during drilling of
Ti6Al4V, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 179 (2006) 124–127.
[4] R Li, A.J Shih, Spiral point drill temperature and stress in high-throughput
drilling of titanium, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture
47 (2007) 2005–2017.
[5] I.L Cantero, M.M Tardio, J.A Canteli, M Marcos, M.H Miguelez, Dry drilling of
alloy Ti-6Al-4V, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing 45
(2005) 1246–1255.
[6] O.V Abramov, High-Intensity Ultrasonics—Theory and Industrial
Applica-tions, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdan, ISBN
90-5699-041-1, 1998.
[7] N.J Churi, Z.J Pei, C Treadwell, Rotary ultrasonic machining of titanium alloy:
effects of machining variables, Machining Science and Technology 10 (2006)
301–321.
[8] C.S Liu, B Zhao, G.F Gao, X.H Zhang, Study on ultrasonic vibration drilling of
particulate reinforced aluminium matrix composites, Key Engineering
[9] H Suzuki, H Yagishita, Burrless Drilling by Vibration Cutting Applying Ultrasonic Torsional Mode Vibration, NAMRC 33, New York, 2005 [10] D.E Brehl, T.A Dow, Review of vibration-assisted machining, Precision Engineering 32 (2007) 153–172.
[11] B Azarhoushang, J Akbari, Ultrasonic-assisted drilling of Inconel 738-LC, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 47 (2008) 1027–1033.
[12] D Zhang, X Feng, L Wang, D Chen, Study on the drill skidding motion in ultrasonic vibration microdrilling, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 34 (6) (1994) 847–857.
[13] K.l Kuo, Experimental investigation of ultrasonic vibration-assisted tapping, Journal of Material Processing Technology 192–193 (2007) 306–311 [14] Y.S Liao, Y.C Chen, H.M Lin, Feasibility study of the ultrasonic vibration assisted drilling of inconel superalloy, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 47 (2007) 1988–1996.
[15] R Neugebauer, A Stoll, Ultrasonic application in drilling, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 192–193 (2004) 306–311.
[16] S.S.F Chang, G.M Bone, Burr size reduction in drilling by ultrasonic assistance, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 21 (2005) 442–450.
[17] C Nath, M Rahman, Effect of machining parameters in ultrasonic vibration cutting, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 48 (2008) 965–974.
[18] R Komanduri, Some clarifications on the mechanics of chip formation when machining titanium alloys, Wear 76 (1982) 15–34.
[19] M Calamaz, D Coupard, F Girot, A new material model for 2D numerical simulation of serrated chip formation when machining titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 48 (2008) 275–288.
[20] D Umbrello, Finite element simulation of conventional and high speed machining of Ti6Al4V alloy, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 196 (2008) 79–87.
[21] D.A.S Macdougall, J Harding, A constitutive relation and failure criterion for Ti6Al4V alloy at impact rates of strain, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics
of Solids 47 (1999) 1157–1185.
[22] Z Deyuan, W Lijiang, Investigation of chip in vibration drilling, International Journal of Machine Tool and Manufacture 38 (1998) 165–176.
[23] V.K Astashev, V.I Babitsky, Ultrasonic Processes and Machines—Dynamics, Control and Applications, Springer, Berlin, ISBN 978-3-540-72060-7, 2007 [24] V.I Babitsky, I.J Sokolov, Autoresonant Homeostat concept for engineering application of nonlinear vibration modes, Nonlinear Dynamics 50 (2007) 447–460.
[25] S Voronina, V Babitsky, Autoresonant control strategies of loaded ultrasonic transducer for machining applications, Journal of Sound and Vibration 313 (2008) 395–417.
[26] R Komanduri, B.F Von Turkovich, New observations on the mechanism
of chip formation when machining titanium alloys, Wear 69 (1981) 179–188.
[27] To¨nshoff, H.K., Arendt, C., Ben Amor, R., 2000 Cutting of hardened steel, Annals of the CIRP, Keynote Paper, vol 49/2/2000, pp 547–566.
[28] J.B Mann, C Saldana, S Chandrasekar, W.D Compton, K.P Trumble, Metal particulate production by modulation-assisted machining, Scripta Materalia Fig 10 Flow stress curves at different strains and temperatures according to Johnson–Cook [40] and Zerilli–Armstrong [21] models.
Trang 9[29] M Bono, J Ni, A model for predicting the heat flow into the workpiece in dry
drilling, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 124 (2002)
773–777.
[30] S Kalidas, S Kapoor, R.E DeVor, Influence of thermal effects on hole quality in
dry drilling, Part 1: A thermal model of workpiece temperatures, Transactions
of the ASME 124 (2002) 258–266.
[31] R Li, A.L Shih, Spiral point drill temperature and stress in high-throughput
drilling of titanium, International Journal of Machine Tool and Manufacture
47 (2007) 2005–2017.
[32] T Ueda, R Nozaki, A Hosokawa, Temperature measurement of cutting edge
in drilling-effect of oil mist, Annals of the CIRP 56/1/2007 (2007) 93–96.
[33] C.H Huang, L.C Jan, R Li, A Shih, A three-dimensional inverse problem in
estimating the applied heat flux of a titanium drilling—theoretical and
experimental studies, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 50
(2007) 3265–3277.
[34] A.V Mitrofanov, V.I Babitsky, V.V Silberschmidt, Thermomechanical finite
element simulations of ultrasonically assisted turning, Computational
Materials Science 32 (2005) 463–471.
[35] del Campo, L., 2007 Disen ˜ o, Montaje y Calibracio´n de un Dispositivo Experimental para Medir Emisividad Espectral Direccional: Aplicacio´n a Materiales de Intere´s Tecnolo´gico Doctoral Thesis, Departamento de Fı´sica de
la Materia Condensada, University of the Basque Country.
[36] J Pujana, L Del Campo, R.B Perez-Saez, M.J Tello, I Gallego, P.J Arrazola, Radiation thermometry applied to temperature measurement in the cutting process, Measurement Science and Technology 18 (2008) 1–8.
[37] D.A Stephenson, J.S Agapiou, Metal Cutting: Theory and Practice, second ed, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, ISBN 978-0-8247-5888-2, 2006.
[38] N Ahmed, A.V Mitrofanov, V.I Babitsky, V.V Silberschmidt, Analysis of material response to ultrasonic vibration loading in turning Inconel 718, Materials Science and Engineering A 424 (2006) 318–325.
[39] A.V Mitrofanov, V.I Babitsky, V.V Silberschmidt, Finite element simulations
of ultrasonically assisted turning, Computational Materials Science 28 (2003) 645–653.
[40] W.S Lee, C.F Lin, High-temperature deformation behaviour of Ti6Al4V alloy evaluated by high strain-rate compression tests, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 75 (1998) 127–136.