1. Trang chủ
  2. » Tất cả

The medical letter on drugs and therapeutics june 22 2015

9 298 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 9
Dung lượng 267,38 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

...p 89p 91 Droxidopa Northera for Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension ...p 92 Bellafi ll for Acne Scars ...p 93 In Brief: Ketoacidosis with SGLT2 Inhibitors ...p 94 Addendum: Nivolumab O

Trang 1

FORWARDING OR COPYING IS A VIOLATION OF U.S AND INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT LAWS

The Medical Letter, Inc publications are protected by U.S and international copyright laws Forwarding, copying or any distribution of this material is prohibited.

Sharing a password with a non-subscriber or otherwise making the contents of this site available to third parties is strictly prohibited.

By accessing and reading the attached content I agree to comply with U.S and international copyright laws and these terms and conditions of The Medical Letter, Inc.

For further information click: Subscriptions, Site Licenses, Reprints

or call customer service at: 800-211-2769

Important Copyright Message

IN THIS ISSUE

ISSUE

1433

Volume 56

Published by The Medical Letter, Inc • A Nonprofi t Organization

ISSUE No

1471 Liraglutide (Saxenda) for Weight Loss Which PPI? p 89p 91

Droxidopa (Northera) for Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension p 92

Bellafi ll for Acne Scars p 93

In Brief: Ketoacidosis with SGLT2 Inhibitors .p 94

Addendum: Nivolumab (Opdivo) for Metastatic Melanoma and Metastatic NSCLC p 94

on Drugs and Therapeutics

Adapted for Canada Objective Drug Reviews Since 1959

Trang 2

89

on Drugs and Therapeutics

Objective Drug Reviews Since 1959

Take CME Exams

ISSUE

1433

Volume 56

ISSUE No

1471

ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Which PPI? p 91

Droxidopa (Northera) for Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension p 92

Bellafi ll for Acne Scars p 93

In Brief: Ketoacidosis with SGLT2 Inhibitors p 94

Addendum: Nivolumab (Opdivo) for Metastatic Melanoma and Metastatic NSCLC p 94

Liraglutide (Saxenda) for

Weight Loss

The injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)

receptor agonist liraglutide, previously approved by the

FDA for treatment of type 2 diabetes as Victoza,1 has

now also been approved at a higher dose as Saxenda

(Novo Nordisk) for chronic weight management

in adults with a BMI ≥30, or a BMI ≥27 with a

weight-related comorbidity such as hypertension,

dyslipidemia, or diabetes

Pronunciation Key Liraglutide: lir” a gloo’ tide Saxenda: sax end ah

DRUGS FOR WEIGHT LOSS – Pharmacologic treatment

of obesity has been limited by modest effi cacy, adverse

effects, low adherence rates, and regain of weight with

drug cessation.2 Drugs approved by the FDA for

long-term treatment of obesity are listed in Table 2 on page 90

Phentermine/topiramate ER (Qsymia) is the most

effective drug available to date for weight loss

Lorcaserin (Belviq) is only modestly effective, but is

generally well tolerated.3 The lipase inhibitor orlistat

(Xenical, Alli) is also modestly effective, but it can

cause unpleasant adverse effects such as flatulence

with discharge, oily spotting, and fecal urgency The

fi xed-dose combination (Contrave) of bupropion

(Wellbutrin SR, Zyban, and others) and naltrexone

(ReVia, and others) has been effective, but nausea is

common, and serious neuropsychiatric reactions have

been reported.4

MECHANISM OF ACTION — Liraglutide decreases

caloric intake The exact mechanism is unknown;

delayed gastric emptying and agonist effects on GLP-1

Table 1 Liraglutide Clinical Trials 1

Mean % of Patients

Study Design Drug Regimen Loss (%) Loss ≥5% Patients with Diabetes

RA DeFronzo et al 2,3 Liraglutide 3 mg 5.9% 49.9%

56 weeks (n=846) Liraglutide 1.8 mg 4 4.6% 35.6%

Patients without Diabetes

X Pi-Sunyer et al 5 Liraglutide 3 mg 8.0% 63.2%

56 weeks (n=3731) Placebo 2.6% 27.1%

Patients without Diabetes after ≥5% Initial Weight Loss 6

TA Wadden et al 7 Liraglutide 3 mg 6.2% 8 50.5% 8

56 weeks (n=422) Placebo 0.2% 8 21.8% 8

1 In addition to diet and exercise in adults with a BMI ≥30 or a BMI ≥27 with a weight-related comorbidity

2 RA DeFronzo et al Effects of liraglutide 3.0 mg and 1.8 mg on body weight and cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight and obese adults with type

2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM): the SCALE Diabetes randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 56-week trial The Endocrine Society’s 96th annual meeting and expo, Chicago, June 21-24, 2014 Poster SAT-0930

3 Effect of liraglutide on body weight in overweight or obese subjects with type 2 diabetes: SCALE Diabetes Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov Ac-cessed June 11, 2015

4 FDA-approved as a titration dose, but not for maintenance.

5 X Pi-Sunyer et al N Engl J Med 2015; 373:11.

6 Patients were fi rst treated with a low-calorie diet and lost ≥5% of initial body weight in 4-12 weeks during the run-in phase.

7 TA Wadden et al Int J Obes (Lond) 2013; 37:1443.

8 Weight loss observed after randomization.

receptors in areas of the brain involved in appetite regulation have been implicated

CLINICAL STUDIES – Table 1 summarizes the results

of some randomized trials of liraglutide for weight loss

in overweight or obese adults

ADVERSE EFFECTS – Common adverse effects of

liraglutide include nausea, diarrhea, constipation, vom-iting, hypoglycemia, headache, decreased appetite, and dyspepsia Acute pancreatitis and cholelithiasis, acute renal failure and worsening of chronic renal failure, increased heart rate, suicidal thoughts, and

Trang 3

neuropsychiatric reactions have been reported in clinical

trials Serious hypersensitivity reactions, including

angioedema and anaphylaxis, have occurred in patients

treated with liraglutide Thyroid C-cell tumors have been

reported in rodents given liraglutide, and the FDA has

required a boxed warning about the risk of thyroid C-cell

tumors in the package insert The drug is contraindicated

in patients with a personal or family history of medullary

thyroid carcinoma and in those with Multiple Endocrine

Neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2)

PREGNANCY – Saxenda is contraindicated (category

X) for use during pregnancy because weight loss is not

benefi cial for pregnant women and may harm the fetus

DRUG INTERACTIONS – Liraglutide delays gastric

emptying and may decrease the rate of absorption

of other drugs For patients who are taking an insulin

secretagogue concurrently, the dose of the insulin

secretagogue should be reduced

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION – Saxenda is available

in packages containing either three or fi ve 18 mg/3 mL

pre-fi lled multi-dose pens that deliver doses of 0.6,

1.2, 1.8, 2.4, or 3 mg The starting dose for treatment

of obesity is 0.6 mg injected subcutaneously in the abdomen, thigh, or upper arm once daily The dose

is titrated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg up to the recommended daily dosage of 3 mg once daily (the recommended daily dose for diabetes is 1.8 mg) If weight loss of ≥4% is not achieved within 16 weeks of starting treatment, liraglutide should be discontinued

CONCLUSION – Use of the glucagon-like peptide-1

(GLP-1) receptor agonist liraglutide (Saxenda) as an

ad-junct to diet and exercise resulted in placebo-corrected weight loss of about 6 kg after one year As with other drugs approved for this indication, its effectiveness may wane in the second year and thereafter Liraglutide must be injected daily, gastrointestinal adverse effects are common, and it is expensive ■

1 Liraglutide (Victoza) for type 2 diabetes Med Lett Drugs Ther 2010; 52:25.

2 Diet, drugs, and surgery for weight loss Med Lett Drugs Ther 2015; 57:21.

3 Two drugs for weight loss Med Lett Drugs Ther 2012; 54:69

4 Contrave – a combination of bupropion and naltrexone for weight loss Med Lett Drugs Ther 2014; 56:112

Table 2 Some FDA-Approved Drugs for Long-Term Treatment of Obesity 1

Some Available Usual Mean Drug Formulations Adult Dosage Weight Loss 2 Cost 3

Sympathomimetic Amine/Antiepileptic Combination

Phentermine/topiramate ER – Qsymia (Vivus) 7.5/46, 15/92 mg ER caps 4 7.5/46-15/92 mg once/d 4.1-10.7 kg 5-7 $170.70

Lipase Inhibitor

Orlistat – Xenical (Genentech) 120 mg caps 120 mg tid 2.5-3.4 kg 8 512.10

Serotonin Receptor Agonist

Lorcaserin – Belviq (Eisai) 10 mg tabs 10 mg bid 2.9-3.6 kg 10-12 199.50

Opioid Antagonist/Antidepressant Combination

Naltrexone/bupropion – Contrave 8/90 mg ER tabs 16/180 mg bid 3.7-5.2 kg 7,13-15 199.50 (Orexigen/Takeda)

GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

Liraglutide – Saxenda (Novo Nordisk) 18 mg/3 mL prefi lled pen 16 3 mg SC once/d 5.8-5.9 kg 17,18 1068.30

ER = extended-release

1 Weight loss drugs, including over-the-counter medications, are not recommended for use during pregnancy.

2 Placebo-corrected weight loss above diet and lifestyle modifi cations alone after one year

3 Approximate WAC for 30 days’ treatment with the lowest usual dosage WAC = wholesaler acquisition cost or manufacturer’s published price to wholesalers; WAC represents a published catalogue or list price and may not represent an actual transactional price Source: AnalySource® Monthly June 5, 2015 Reprinted with permission by First Databank, Inc All rights reserved ©2015 www.fdbhealth.com/policies/drug-pricing-policy Medicare does not cover weight loss drugs.

4 Also available in 3.75/23 mg and 11.25/69 mg capsules, which are intended for use only during titration.

5 DB Allison et al Controlled-release phentermine/topiramate in severely obese adults: a randomized controlled trial (EQUIP) Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012; 20:330.

6 KM Gadde et al Effects of low-dose, controlled-release, phentermine plus topiramate combination on weight and associated comorbidities in overweight and obese adults (CONQUER): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial Lancet 2011; 377:1341

7 The range includes weight loss observed with titration and maintenance dosages.

8 SZ Yanovski and JA Yanovski Long-term drug treatment for obesity: a systematic and clinical review JAMA 2014; 311:74.

9 Available over the counter.

10 SR Smith et al Multicenter, placebo-controlled trial of lorcaserin for weight management N Engl J Med 2010; 363:245.

11 MC Fidler et al A one-year randomized trial of lorcaserin for weight loss in obese and overweight adults: the BLOSSOM trial J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96:3067.

12 PM O’Neil et al Randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of lorcaserin for weight loss in type 2 diabetes mellitus: the BLOOM-DM study Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012; 20:1426

13 FL Greenway et al Effect of naltrexone plus bupropion on weight loss in overweight and obese adults (COR-I): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial Lancet 2010; 376:595

14 CM Apovian et al A randomized, phase 3 trial of naltrexone SR/bupropion SR on weight and obesity-related risk factors (COR-II) Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013; 21:935

15 TA Wadden et al Weight loss with naltrexone SR/bupropion SR combination therapy as an adjunct to behavior modifi cation: the COR-BMOD trial Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011; 19:110

16 Each pen can deliver doses of 0.6, 1.2, 1.8, 2.4, or 3 mg Sold in packages containing 3 or 5 multi-dose pens.

17 A Astrup et al Safety, tolerability and sustained weight loss over 2 years with the once-daily human GLP-1 analog, liraglutide Int J Obes (Lond) 2012; 36:843.

18 TA Wadden et al Weight maintenance and additional weight loss with liraglutide after low-calorie-diet-induced weight loss: the SCALE Maintenance

randomized study Int J Obes (Lond) 2013; 37:1443.

Trang 4

Which PPI?

An article published in the New York Times on May 1,

2015 listed the 10 drugs on which Medicare Part D

spent the most in 2013 The most costly ($2.53

billion) was the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) Nexium

(esomeprazole magnesium), which has recently

be-come available generically

EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY – PPIs are effective

in relieving symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux

disease (GERD) and in healing erosive esophagitis

and peptic ulcers, and they are generally well

tolerated There is no convincing evidence that any

one PPI is more effective or better tolerated than

any other.1,2

DRUG INTERACTIONS – Omeprazole and

esomep-razole are inhibitors of CYP2C19 and can increase

serum concentrations of drugs metabolized by this

pathway, such as diazepam (Valium, and generics)

and phenytoin (Dilantin, and others) They can also

inhibit conversion of the antiplatelet drug clopidogrel

Table 1 Oral Proton Pump Inhibitors

Drug Some Available Formulations Usual Adult Dosage 1,2 Cost 3

Dexlansoprazole – Dexilant (Takeda) 30, 60 mg DR caps 30-60 mg once/d $222.10 Esomeprazole magnesium – generic 20, 40 mg DR caps 20-40 mg once/d 204.50

Nexium 24HR (OTC) (Pfi zer) 22.3 mg DR caps 5 16.40 6

Lansoprazole – generic 15, 30 mg DR caps 15-30 mg once/d 64.60

Prevacid 24HR (OTC)7 (Novartis) 15 mg DR caps 17.80 6

Omeprazole – generic 10, 20, 40 mg DR caps 20-40 mg once/d 16.30

Prilosec (AstraZeneca) 10, 20, 40 mg DR caps 4 218.70

Omeprazole/sodium bicarbonate 8 – generic 20, 40 mg packets for susp 9 ; 20-40 mg once/d 344.70

Zegerid (Salix) 20 mg/1.1 g, 40 mg/1.1 g caps 10 383.40

Pantoprazole – generic 20, 40 mg DR tabs 40 mg once/d 6.40

Rabeprazole – generic 20 mg DR tabs 20 mg once/d 52.40

Aciphex Sprinkle (Eisai) 5, 10 mg DR sprinkle caps 11 699.80

DR = delayed-release; OTC = over the counter; ODT = orally disintegrating tablets

1 The lower end of the range is generally used for initial treatment of GERD Higher or more frequent doses may be needed for patients with erosive

esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, hypersecretory conditions such as Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, or for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection.

2 PPIs are generally taken 30-60 minutes before the fi rst meal of the day Taking one before the evening meal or taking the drug twice daily may be more effective for nocturnal acid control PPIs should generally be swallowed whole and should not be crushed or chewed Omeprazole/sodium bicarbonate

(Zegerid) should be taken on an empty stomach at least 1 hour before a meal Dexlansoprazole (Dexilant) can be taken with or without food.

3 Approximate WAC for 30 days’ treatment with the lowest usual adult dosage WAC = wholesaler acquisition cost or manufacturer’s published price to wholesalers; WAC represents a published catalogue or list price and may not represent an actual transactional price Source: AnalySource® Monthly June 5,

2015 Reprinted with permission by First Databank, Inc All rights reserved ©2015 www.fdbhealth.com/policies/drug-pricing-policy.

4 Also available in delayed-release powder or granules for suspension.

5 Equivalent to 20 mg of esomeprazole.

6 Cost for 28 tablets or capsules.

7 Also available generically.

8 Immediate-release formulation that contains sodium bicarbonate as a buffer; it should be used with caution in patients on a low-sodium diet.

9 Each packet also contains 1680 mg of sodium bicarbonate.

10 Each capsule contains 1.1 g of sodium bicarbonate; therefore, two 20-mg caps are not equivalent to one 40-mg cap.

11 Contents of the capsule should be sprinkled on soft food or liquid and taken within 15 minutes.

(Plavix, and generics) to its active form Whether

concurrent use of clopidogrel and omeprazole or esomeprazole results in clinically signifi cant adverse cardiovascular outcomes is not clear.3,4 Nevertheless,

in patients taking clopidogrel, it might be prudent to use pantoprazole, dexlansoprazole, lansoprazole, or rabeprazole instead

CONCLUSION — All PPIs appear to be similarly

effective and well tolerated for treatment of peptic ulcer disease and GERD Most are available generically and over the counter for a fraction of the cost of

Nexium or other expensive brand name products

1 Drugs for peptic ulcer disease and GERD Treat Guidel Med Lett 2014; 12:25.

2 PO Katz et al Guidelines for the diagnosis and management

of gastroesophageal reflux disease Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108:308.

3 LB Gerson Proton pump inhibitors and potential interactions with clopidogrel: an update Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2013; 15:329.

4 SD Bouziana and K  Tziomalos Clinical relevance of  clopido-grel-proton pump  inhibitors interaction World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2015; 6:17.

Trang 5

Droxidopa (Northera) for Neurogenic

Orthostatic Hypotension

The FDA has approved droxidopa (Northera –

Lundbeck) for oral treatment of adults with symptomatic

neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (NOH) caused

by primary autonomic failure (Parkinson's disease,

multiple system atrophy, or pure autonomic failure),

dopamine beta-hydroxylase defi ciency, or nondiabetic

autonomic neuropathy This is the fi rst approval for

droxidopa in the US It has been available in Japan for

use in NOH since 1989

Pronunciation Key Droxidopa: drox" i doe' pa Northera: nor ther ah

THE DISORDER — NOH occurs in many

neuro-degenerative and metabolic diseases and is also

associated with aging Lightheadedness and dizziness

are common symptoms, but weakness, fatigue, and

cognitive dysfunction also occur

STANDARD TREATMENT — Lifestyle modifi cations

such as avoiding rapid changes in posture, increasing

fluid and salt intake, and wearing compression

stockings can be helpful, but pharmacotherapy may

be necessary for patients with persistent symptoms

Midodrine, an alpha1-selective adrenergic agonist,

was approved earlier for treatment of severe

symptomatic orthostatic hypotension based on its

effectiveness in increasing standing blood pressure,

but symptomatic or functional improvement in

patients with NOH has not been documented

Other drugs commonly used (off-label) to treat

symptomatic NOH include fludrocortisone and

pyridostigmine.1

MECHANISM OF ACTION — Droxidopa is a prodrug of

norephinephrine Norepinephrine increases peripheral

vascular resistance

CLINICAL STUDIES — Approval of droxidopa was

based on the results of a randomized,

double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 171 patients with

symptomatic NOH associated with Parkinson’s

disease After titration to an optimized dosage of

droxidopa and one week of maintenance treatment,

the mean patient-reported symptom score for

dizziness/lightheadedness decreased (from a

baseline of 5.1 on a scale of 0-10) by 2.3 points with

droxidopa compared to 1.3 points with placebo, a

statistically significant difference About 40% of

patients taking droxidopa required the maximum

dosage (600 mg three times daily) The mean

increase in standing systolic blood pressure was 6.4 mm Hg with droxidopa compared to 0.7 mm Hg with placebo Symptom scores after 2, 4, and 8 weeks

of maintenance treatment were not significantly different in the droxidopa and placebo groups, but the patients taking droxidopa reported fewer falls.2

In an earlier multicenter trial, 162 patients with symptomatic NOH who responded to droxidopa during

an initial dose-titration period were randomized, after

a 7-day washout period, to droxidopa or placebo for

found some of the results implausible, and the results for only 122 patients are summarized in the package insert The mean dizziness/lightheadedness score for these patients decreased by only 0.7 points more with droxidopa than with placebo, which was not a statistically signifi cant difference

A withdrawal study randomized 101 patients with NOH who had been titrated to an optimized dose of droxidopa and treated for 1-3 weeks to continue droxidopa or switch to placebo for 14 days Mean dizziness/lightheadedness scores increased in both groups and were not signifi cantly different from each other at the end of the study.4

ADVERSE EFFECTS — In short-term clinical trials,

headache, dizziness, nausea, and hypertension were reported in >5% of patients taking droxidopa and with at least a 3% higher incidence than with placebo Droxidopa may cause or exacerbate supine hypertension Postmarketing reports in Japanese patients taking droxidopa have described a symptom complex resembling neuroleptic malignant syndrome Droxidopa may exacerbate existing ischemic heart disease, arrhythmias, and congestive heart failure

PREGNANCY — Droxidopa is classifi ed as category C

(fetal and maternal toxicity in animals; no adequate studies in women) for use during pregnancy

Table 1 Pharmacology

Class Norepinephrine prodrug Route Oral

Formulation 100, 200, 300 mg capsules Tmax 1-4 hrs (delayed by ~2 hrs with a high-fat meal) Distribution Crosses the blood-brain barrier

Metabolism Via catecholamine system; by dopa

decarboxylase to norepinephrine, by COMT

to 3-OM-DOPS, and by DOPS aldolase to protocatechualdehyde

Half-life ~2.5 hrs Excretion Urine (~75%)

Trang 6

DRUG INTERACTIONS — Concurrent administration

of droxidopa and other drugs that increase

blood pressure could increase the risk of supine

hypertension Concomitant use of the peripheral

dopa decarboxylase inhibitor carbidopa, particularly

at high doses, could prevent conversion of droxidopa

to norepinephrine outside the CNS In clinical trials,

concomitant administration of levodopa/carbidopa

decreased the clearance of droxidopa, but did not

increase the incidence of adverse effects

DOSAGE, ADMINISTRATION, AND COST — The

rec-ommended starting dosage of droxidopa is 100 mg

three times daily (on arising in the morning, at midday,

and in the late afternoon at least 3 hours before

bedtime) The dose can be increased in increments

of 100 mg three times daily every 24-48 hours to

a maximum of 600 mg three times daily The drug

should be administered consistently either with or

without food

A boxed warning in the labeling states that supine

blood pressure should be monitored before starting

droxidopa and during treatment, particularly after

increasing the dose Patients should be told to elevate

the head of the bed when resting or sleeping

The cost of a 30-day supply of Northera ranges,

depending on the dose, from $1548 to $9291,

compared to about $272 for generic midodrine 10 mg

three times daily.5

CONCLUSION — Droxidopa (Northera) appears to

be only marginally effective for treatment of the

symptoms of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, and

it is expensive It may decrease the risk of falling in

some patients with Parkinson’s disease ■

1 MJ Berger and K Kimpinski A practical guide to the treatment

of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension Can J Neurol Sci 2014;

41:156

2 RA Hauser et al Droxidopa for the short-term treatment of

symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension in

Parkin-son’s disease (nOH306B) Mov Disord 2015; 30:646.

3 H Kaufmann et al Droxidopa for neurogenic orthostatic

hypo-tension: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

Neu-rology 2014; 83:328.

4 I Biaggioni et al Randomized withdrawal study of patients with

symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension responsive

to droxidopa Hypertension 2015; 65:101.

5 Approximate WAC WAC = wholesaler acquisition cost or

man-ufacturer’s published price to wholesalers; WAC represents a

published catalogue or list price and may not represent an

ac-tual transactional price Source: AnalySource® Monthly June

5, 2015 Reprinted with permission by First Databank, Inc All

rights reserved ©2015

www.fdbhealth.com/policies/drug-pricing-policy.

Bellafi ll (Suneva), a dermal fi ller approved earlier for

correction of nasolabial folds, has now also been approved by the FDA for correction of moderate to severe, atrophic, distensible facial acne scars on the cheek in adults ≥21 years old It is the only dermal fi ller approved in the US for correction of facial acne scars

MECHANISM OF ACTION — Bellafi ll contains 80%

bovine collagen solution (including 0.3% lidocaine) and 20% non-resorbable polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) microspheres The collagen adds volume below pitted acne scars to lift them to the level of the surrounding skin, while the PMMA microspheres, according to the manufacturer, create a matrix that supports endogenous collagen production and provides long-term structural support

A CLINICAL STUDY — Approval of Bellafi ll for atrophic

facial acne scars was based on a double-blind trial in

147 patients with ≥4 moderate to severe atrophic facial acne scars Patients were randomized to an injection

with ArteFill (which was rebranded as Bellafi ll in 2014) or

saline, with a touch-up injection 4 weeks later if needed The primary endpoint, at least a 2-point improvement on the 4-point Acne Scar Rating Scale in ≥50% of scars at 6

months, occurred in 64% of patients treated with Bellafi ll

and in 33% of those treated with saline Response rates were maintained through 12 months.1

ADVERSE EFFECTS — Swelling, redness, pain,

bruis-ing, lumps/bumps, itchbruis-ing, and discoloration at the treatment site can occur, but usually resolve within

7 days Bellafi ll should not be used in patients with

bleeding disorders or in those with known suscepti-bility to keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring

As with other long-acting dermal fi llers, granulomas can appear days to years after injection.2 The FDA recently warned that serious injuries including vision impairment, blindness, stroke, and tissue necrosis can occur from unintentional injection of dermal fi llers into facial blood vessels.3

DOSAGE, ADMINISTRATION, AND COST — Bellafi ll is

available in a sterile 0.8-mL single-use syringe with a 26-gauge needle Skin allergy testing should be done before administration of the drug Bellafi ll should be

injected into the deep dermis or dermal/subdermal junction If the desired result is not achieved, one or two touch-up injections can be given at least 2 weeks apart The safety of injecting more than 3.5 mL per treatment site or more than 8.9 mL overall has not been

Bellafi ll for Acne Scars

Trang 7

IN BRIEF

Ketoacidosis with SGLT2 Inhibitors

The FDA has warned that use of an SGLT2

(sodium-glucose co-transporter 2) inhibitor for treatment of

SGLT2 inhibitors, canagliflozin (Invokana, Invokamet),

dapagliflozin (Farxiga, Xigduo XR), and empagliflozin

(Jardiance, Glyxambi), are approved for treatment of type

2 diabetes in the US Between March 2013 and June 2014,

20 cases of ketoacidosis requiring emergency room visits

or hospitalization were reported in patients who had

recently started taking an SGLT2 inhibitor; the median

time to onset of symptoms after initiation of therapy was

2 weeks (range 1-175 days) SGLT2 inhibitors decrease

renal glucose reabsorption and increase urinary glucose

excretion, resulting in a reduction in blood glucose levels

The mechanism by which these drugs could cause

ketoacidosis has not been established

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) occurs primarily in patients

with type 1 diabetes; it is characterized by elevated blood

glucose levels (usually ≥250 mg/dL), a high anion gap,

glucosuria, and ketonuria.2 Unlike typical cases of DKA,

most ketoacidosis cases associated with SGLT2 inhibitors

have occurred in patients with type 2 diabetes, and in

some patients glucose levels were <200 mg/dL Only

half of the 20 cases were associated with a recognizable

DKA-precipitating factor, such as infection, reduced

caloric intake, or reduced insulin dose Other factors that

may contribute to the development of high anion gap

metabolic acidosis, such as hypovolemia, hypoxemia,

reduced oral intake, acute renal impairment, and a history

of alcohol use, were identifi ed in some patients.1 ■

View our detailed online table: SGLT-2 Inhibitors

1 FDA drug safety communication: FDA warns that SGLT2

inhibi-tors for diabetes may result in a serious condition of too much

acid in the blood Available at: www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/

ucm446845.htm Accessed June 11, 2015.

2 AE Kitabchi et al Hyperglycemic crises in adult patients with

diabetes Diabetes Care 2009; 32:1335.

Addendum: Nivolumab (Opdivo) for Metastatic

Melanoma and Metastatic NSCLC

After our article on nivolumab (Opdivo – BMS) for

treatment of metastatic melanoma and metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was

published in the most recent issue of The Medical

supporting the effi cacy of the drug in previously untreated melanoma and previously treated nonsquamous NSCLC

MELANOMA – In a double-blind trial, 945 patients

with previously untreated, unresectable stage III or IV melanoma were randomized to receive ipilimumab, nivolumab, or combination therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab Progression-free survival, a primary endpoint, improved by 43% with nivolumab (median 6.9 months) and by 58% with combination therapy (median 11.5 months), compared to ipilimumab (median 2.9 months)

In patients with tumors that expressed the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on ≥5% of cells, median progression-free survival was similar in the nivolumab and combination groups (both 14.0 months); in those with tumors that expressed PD-L1 on <5% of cells, it was 5.3 months with nivolumab alone and 11.2 months with both drugs Rates of complete or partial response were 19.0% with ipilimumab, 43.7% with nivolumab, and 57.6% with combination therapy At least one severe (grade 3-4) drug-related adverse effect occurred in 27.3% of patients receiving ipilimumab, 16.3% of those receiving

NONSQUAMOUS NSCLC – In an open-label trial

(avail-able only as an abstract), 582 patients with advanced

nonsquamous NSCLC that had progressed during or after

treatment with a platinum doublet-based regimen (and,

if appropriate, a kinase inhibitor) were randomized to re-ceive nivolumab or docetaxel until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred Nivolumab signifi cantly improved overall survival, the primary endpoint, by 27% compared to docetaxel (median 12.2 vs 9.4 months) Survival rates in the two groups were similar in patients with tumors expressing PD-L1 on <1% of cells, but in patients with tumors expressing PD-L1 on ≥1%, ≥5%, and

≥10% of cells, nivolumab improved overall survival by 41%, 57%, and 60%, respectively, compared to docetaxel Patients receiving nivolumab were signifi cantly more likely to have an objective response (19.2% vs 12.4%) Severe (grade 3+) drug-related adverse effects occurred

in 10.5% of patients receiving nivolumab and in 53.7% of those receiving docetaxel.3 ■

1 Nivolumab (Opdivo) for metastatic melanoma and metastatic NSCLC Med Lett Drugs Ther 2015; 57:85.

2 J Larkin et al Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or mono-therapy in untreated melanoma N Engl J Med 2015 May 31 (epub).

3 L Paz-Ares et al Phase III, randomized trial (CheckMate 057) of nivolumab (NIVO) versus docetaxel (DOC) in advanced non-squa-mous cell (non-SQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) J Clin On-col 2015; 33 (suppl; abstr LBA109) Available at: abstracts.asco org/156/AbstView_156_154634.html Accessed June 11, 2015.

1 J Karnik et al A double-blind, randomized, multicenter,

con-trolled trial of suspended polymethylmethacrylate

micro-spheres for the correction of atrophic facial acne scars J Am

Acad Dermatol 2014; 71:77.

2 SM Daines and EF Williams Complications associated with

in-jectable soft-tissue fi llers: a 5-year retrospective review JAMA

Facial Plast Surg 2013; 15:226

3 FDA Unintentional injection of soft tissue fi ller into blood

vessels in the face: FDA safety communication Available at:

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/

ucm448255.htm Accessed June 11, 2015.

4 Cost according to the manufacturer.

CONCLUSION — Bellafi ll appears to be cosmetically

effective in improving moderate to severe atrophic

facial acne scars Its safety remains to be established;

as with other dermal fi llers, granulomas can appear

days to years after injection, and serious injuries have

occurred from unintentional injection of dermal fi llers

into facial blood vessels ■

Trang 8

Questions start on next page

ACCREDITATION INFORMATION:

ACCME: The Medical Letter is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians The Medical

Letter designates this enduring material for a maximum of 2 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™ Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity This CME activity was planned and produced in accordance with the ACCME Essentials and Policies.

AAFP : This enduring material activity, The Medical Letter Continuing Medical Education Program, has been reviewed and is acceptable for up to 52 Prescribed credits by the

American Academy of Family Physicians Term of approval begins January 1, 2015 Term of approval is for one year from this date Each issue is approved for 2 Prescribed credits Credit may be claimed for one year from the date of each issue Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity

ACPE: The Medical Letter is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education This exam is acceptable

for 2.0 hour(s) of knowledge-based continuing education credit (0.2 CEU)

The American Academy of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) and the American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA) accept AMA Category 1 credit for the Physician’s

Recognition Award from organizations accredited by the ACCME.

This activity, being ACCME (AMA) approved, is acceptable for Category 2-B credit by the American Osteopathic Association (AOA)

Physician Assistants: The National Commission on Certifi cation of Physician Assistants (NCCPA) accepts AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ from organizations accredited by

ACCME NCCPA also accepts AAFP Prescribed credits for recertifi cation The Medical Letter is accredited by both ACCME and AAFP.

Physicians in Canada: Members of The College of Family Physicians of Canada are eligible to receive Mainpro-M1 credits (equivalent to AAFP Prescribed credits) as per our

reciprocal agreement with the American Academy of Family Physicians

MISSION:

The mission of The Medical Letter’s Continuing Medical Education Program is to support the professional development of healthcare providers including physicians, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and physician assistants by providing independent, unbiased drug information and prescribing recommendations that are free of industry influence The program content includes current information and unbiased reviews of FDA-approved and off-label uses of drugs, their mechanisms of action, clinical trials, dosage and administration, adverse effects, and drug interactions The Medical Letter delivers educational content in the form of self-study material.

The expected outcome of the CME program is to increase the participant’s ability to know, or apply knowledge into practice after assimilating, information presented in

materials contained in The Medical Letter.

The Medical Letter will strive to continually improve the CME program through periodic assessment of the program and activities The Medical Letter aims to be a leader in supporting the professional development of healthcare providers through Core Competencies by providing continuing medical education that is unbiased and free of industry influence The Medical Letter is supported solely by subscription fees and accepts no advertising, grants, or donations.

GOAL:

Through this program, The Medical Letter expects to provide the healthcare community with unbiased, reliable, and timely educational content that they will use to make independent and informed therapeutic choices in their practice.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES:

Activity participants will read and assimilate unbiased reviews of FDA-approved and off-label uses of drugs and other treatment modalities Activity participants will be

able to select and prescribe, or confi rm the appropriateness of the prescribed usage of, the drugs and other therapeutic modalities discussed in The Medical Letter with

specifi c attention to clinical trials, pathophysiology, dosage and administration, drug metabolism and interactions, and patient management Activity participants will make independent and informed therapeutic choices in their practice.

Upon completion of this program, the participant will be able to:

1 Review the effi cacy and safety of liraglutide (Saxenda) for chronic weight management.

2 Discuss the comparative effi cacy and tolerability of proton pump inhibitors.

3 Review the effi cacy and safety of droxidopa (Northera) for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension.

4 Discuss the FDA warning about the risk of ketoacidosis in patients taking SGLT2 inhibitors.

5 Review the new data supporting the effi cacy of nivolumab (Opdivo) for treatment of metastatic melanoma and NSCLC

Privacy and Confi dentiality: The Medical Letter guarantees our fi rm commitment to your privacy We do not sell any of your information Secure server software (SSL) is used

for commerce transactions through VeriSign, Inc No credit card information is stored.

IT Requirements: Windows XP/Vista/7/8, Mac OS X+; current versions of Microsoft IE, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Safari, or any other compatible web browser

High-speed connection.

Have any questions? Call us at 800-211-2769 or 914-235-0500 or e-mail us at: custserv@medicalletter.org

medicalletter.org/cme-program Earn Up To 52 Credits Per Year

Choose CME from The Medical Letter in the format that’s right for you!

upon successful completion of the test A score of 70% or greater is required to pass the exam Our comprehensive exams allow you to test at your own pace in the comfort of your home or offi ce Comprehensive exams are offered every January and July enabling you to earn up to 52 credits per year (The July 2014 exam contains 78 questions and provides 13 credits) $49/exam.

A score of 70% or greater is required to pass the exam.

A score of 70% or greater is required to pass the exam.

Trang 9

The Medical Letter ®

Online Continuing Medical Education

DO NOT FAX OR MAIL THIS EXAM

To take CME exams and earn credit, go to:

medicalletter.org/CMEstatus Issue 1471 Questions

(Correspond to questions #121-130 in Comprehensive Exam #72, available July 2015)

6 Droxidopa is a prodrug of:

a levodopa

b carbidopa

c epinephrine

d norepinephrine

7 Droxidopa has been reported to:

a reduce falls in patients with Parkinson’s disease

b reduce relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis

c exacerbate diabetes

d all of the above

Bellafi ll for Acne Scars

8 In the double-blind trial on which the approval of Bellafi ll was

based, 64% of patients treated with the active drug achieved at least a 2-point improvement on the Acne Scar Rating Scale in

≥50% of acne scars, the primary endpoint What percentage of those treated with saline achieved the primary endpoint?

a 0%

b 10%

c 14%

d 33%

In Brief: Ketoacidosis with SGLT2 Inhibitors

9 In the cases of ketoacidosis reported in patients taking an SGLT2 inhibitor:

a all patients had blood glucose levels >250 mg/dL

b symptoms developed after a median of 2 weeks

c all patients had type 1 diabetes

d none of the above

Addendum: Nivolumab (Opdivo) for Metastatic Melanoma and

Metastatic NSCLC

10 In the trial in patients with previously untreated melanoma, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab:

a improved progression-free survival more than either drug alone

b was more likely to induce a complete or partial response than either drug alone

c was more toxic than either drug used alone

d all of the above

Liraglutide (Saxenda) for Weight Loss

1 Liraglutide is administered:

a orally

b subcutaneously

c intramuscularly

d intravenously

2 Mean weight loss with the recommended dose of liraglutide for

chronic weight management has been about:

a <2%

b 2-4%

c 6-8%

d 8-10%

3 A 28-year-old woman in good health with a BMI of 27 asks you

if she should take Saxenda to lose weight You could tell her

that:

a the drug is not recommended for adults with a BMI

<30 unless they have a weight-related disease such as

diabetes

b there are some concerns about its safety, particularly that

it may cause thyroid C-cell tumors

c it costs more than any other drug approved by the FDA for

long-term weight loss

d all of the above

Which PPI?

4 Compared to other PPIs, esomeprazole is:

a more effective

b better tolerated

c less likely to interact with other drugs

d none of the above

Droxidopa (Northera) for Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension

5 Droxidopa:

a is the fi rst drug to be approved in the US for treatment of

orthostatic hypotension

b is a new drug

c has been available in Japan for NOH since 1989

d was associated with limb-shortening fetal deformities in

the UK

ACPE UPN: Per Issue Exam: 0379-0000-15-471-H01-P; Release: June 22, 2015, Expire: June 22, 2016 Comprehensive Exam 72: 0379-0000-15-072-H01-P; Release: July 2015, Expire: July 2016

EDITOR IN CHIEF: Mark Abramowicz, M.D.; EXECUTIVE EDITOR: Gianna Zuccotti, M.D., M.P.H., F.A.C.P., Harvard Medical School; EDITOR: Jean-Marie Pflomm, Pharm.D.; ASSISTANT EDITORS, DRUG INFORMATION: Susan M Daron, Pharm.D., Corinne Z Morrison, Pharm.D., Michael P Viscusi, Pharm.D.; CONSULTING EDITORS: Brinda M Shah, Pharm.D.,

F Peter Swanson, M.D; SENIOR ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Amy Faucard

CONTRIBUTING EDITORS: Carl W Bazil, M.D., Ph.D., Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; Vanessa K Dalton, M.D., M.P.H., University of Michigan Medical

School; Eric J Epstein, M.D., Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Jane P Gagliardi, M.D., M.H.S., F.A.C.P., Duke University School of Medicine; Jules Hirsch, M.D., Rockefeller University; David N Juurlink, BPhm, M.D., Ph.D., Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Richard B Kim, M.D., University of Western Ontario; Hans Meinertz, M.D., University Hospital, Copenhagen; Franco M Muggia, M.D., New York University Medical Center; Sandip K Mukherjee, M.D., F.A.C.C., Yale School of Medicine; Dan M Roden, M.D., Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Esperance A.K Schaefer, M.D., M.P.H., Harvard Medical School; F Estelle R Simons, M.D., University of Manitoba; Neal H Steigbigel, M.D., New York University School of Medicine; Arthur M F Yee, M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.R., Weill Medical College of Cornell University

MANAGING EDITOR: Susie Wong; ASSISTANT MANAGING EDITOR: Liz Donohue; EDITORIAL ASSISTANT: Cheryl Brown

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF SALES: Gene Carbona; FULFILLMENT & SYSTEMS MANAGER: Cristine Romatowski; DIRECTOR OF MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS: Joanne F Valentino; VICE PRESIDENT AND PUBLISHER: Yosef Wissner-Levy

Founded in 1959 by Arthur Kallet and Harold Aaron, M.D.

Copyright and Disclaimer: The Medical Letter, Inc is an independent nonprofi t organization that provides healthcare professionals with unbiased drug prescribing recommendations The editorial

process used for its publications relies on a review of published and unpublished literature, with an emphasis on controlled clinical trials, and on the opinions of its consultants The Medical Letter, Inc is supported solely by subscription fees and accepts no advertising, grants, or donations No part of the material may be reproduced or transmitted by any process in whole or in part without resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission.

Subscription Services

The Medical Letter, Inc Call: 800-211-2769 or 914-235-0500 To reproduce any portion of this issue, 1 year - $98; 2 years - $189; E-mail: info@medicalletter.org

145 Huguenot St Ste 312 Fax: 914-632-1733 please e-mail your request to: 3 years - $279 $49 per year Call: 800-211-2769 ext 315 New Rochelle, NY 10801-7537 E-mail: custserv@medicalletter.org permissions@medicalletter.org for students, interns, residents, and Special rates available for bulk www.medicalletter.org fellows in the US and Canada subscriptions.

Reprints - $12 each

Ngày đăng: 12/04/2017, 22:32

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm