According to recent guidelines, patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction LVEF ≤40% are considered to have heart failure with reduced ejection with a LVEF ≥50% and symptoms of h
Trang 1FORWARDING OR COPYING IS A VIOLATION OF U.S AND INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT LAWS
The Medical Letter, Inc publications are protected by U.S and international copyright laws Forwarding, copying or any distribution of this material is prohibited.
Sharing a password with a non-subscriber or otherwise making the contents of this site available to third parties is strictly prohibited.
By accessing and reading the attached content I agree to comply with U.S and international copyright laws and these terms and conditions of The Medical Letter, Inc.
or call customer service at: 800-211-2769
Important Copyright Message
IN THIS ISSUE
ISSUE
1433
Volume 56
Published by The Medical Letter, Inc • A Nonprofi t Organization
ISSUE No
1460 Drugs for Chronic Heart Failure p 9
Metreleptin (Myalept) – A Leptin Analog for Generalized Lipodystrophy .p 13
In Brief: Concerns About Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) .p 14
on Drugs and Therapeutics Objective Drug Reviews Since 1959
Trang 2
9
on Drugs and Therapeutics Objective Drug Reviews Since 1959
Take CME Exams
ISSUE
1433
Volume 56
ISSUE No
1460
ALSO IN THIS ISSUE
Metreleptin (Myalept) – A Leptin Analog for Generalized Lipodystrophy .p 13
In Brief: Concerns About Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) .p 14
II (hypotension and renal insuffi ciency), and reduction
of aldosterone production (hyperkalemia) Cough and angioedema can usually be relieved by replacing the ACE inhibitor with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB); ARBs do not increase concentrations of kinins
to the same degree Rash, taste disturbances, and neutropenia can occur with captopril, but appear to be uncommon at the currently recommended dosage
Choice of an ACE Inhibitor – No data are available
showing that any one ACE inhibitor is more effective than any other for treatment of heart failure Some ACE inhibitors (perindopril and benazepril) have not been approved by the FDA for treatment of heart failure
ARBs — Long-term therapy with an angiotensin
receptor blocker (ARB) reduces the risk of death
Heart failure is usually associated with left ventricular
dysfunction According to recent guidelines, patients
with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% are
considered to have heart failure with reduced ejection
with a LVEF ≥50% and symptoms of heart failure
are considered to have heart failure with preserved
ejection fraction (HFpEF) or diastolic heart failure;
there is little evidence that drug treatment improves
acute heart failure is not included here
ACE INHIBITORS — All patients with heart failure
with reduced ejection fraction should receive an
angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor These
drugs improve symptoms (generally over 4-12 weeks),
decrease the incidence of hospitalization, and prolong
survival in patients with heart failure
Dosage – ACE inhibitors should be started at low doses
and titrated to the highest tolerated dose, targeting the
maximum daily dosages listed in Table 1 on page 11
Cautions – ACE inhibitors should be used cautiously
in patients with systolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg,
serum creatinine >3 mg/dL, serum potassium >5.0
mEq/L, or bilateral renal artery stenosis They should
not be used in patients with a history of angioedema
Blood pressure, renal function, and serum potassium
levels should be monitored in patients taking an ACE
inhibitor ACE inhibitors can increase fetal mortality
and should not be used during pregnancy
Adverse Effects – The most common adverse
effects of ACE inhibitors are related to inhibiting
breakdown of endogenous kinins (cough and, less
commonly, angioedema), suppression of angiotensin
Drugs for Chronic Heart Failure
Chronic Heart Failure 1,2
▶ Unless there is a specifi c contraindication, all patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤40%) should take both an ACE inhibitor and a beta blocker, and if volume overloaded, a diuretic as well
▶ An angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) is recommended for patients who cannot tolerate an ACE inhibitor
▶ Addition of an aldosterone antagonist can reduce mortality and hospitalization in patients with symptomatic heart failure or with left ventricular dysfunction after a myocardial infarction
▶ Addition of a combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate to standard therapy has been shown to reduce mortality and symptoms in black patients with NYHA class III-IV heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
▶ Digoxin can decrease symptoms and lower the rate of hospitalization for heart failure, but it does not reduce mortality
▶ There is little evidence that drug treatment improves clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
1 CW Yancy et al Circulation 2013; 118:e240.
2 J Lindenfeld et al J Card Fail 2010; 16:e1.
Related article(s) since publication
Trang 3in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection
fraction; results appear to be similar to those obtained
with ACE inhibitors ARBs can be used in patients
who cannot tolerate (primarily due to cough) an ACE
inhibitor Routine use of an ACE inhibitor and an ARB
together is generally not recommended
Dosage – ARBs should be started at low doses and
titrated to the highest tolerated dose, which is usually
achieved by doubling the dose until the maximum
daily dose (listed in Table 1) is reached
Cautions – As with ACE inhibitors, blood pressure,
renal function, and serum potassium concentrations
should be monitored in patients taking an ARB
Angioedema could occur in patients taking an ARB
who had previously developed it while taking an ACE
inhibitor Like ACE inhibitors, ARBs can increase fetal
mortality and should not be used during pregnancy
Adverse Effects – ARBs, like ACE inhibitors, block the
effects of angiotensin II and may cause hypotension,
renal insuffi ciency, and hyperkalemia, but they do not
cause cough Angioedema occurs less frequently with
ARBs than with ACE inhibitors
Choice of an ARB – Candesartan and valsartan are the
only ARBs approved by the FDA for treatment of heart
failure; losartan, which is available generically, has
BETA BLOCKERS — Unless there is a specifi c
contraindication, all patients with stable heart failure
with reduced ejection fraction should receive a
beta blocker in addition to an ACE inhibitor Use of
bisoprolol, carvedilol, or extended-release metoprolol
succinate in addition to an ACE inhibitor consistently
leads to a 30-40% reduction in hospitalization and
mortality in adults with New York Heart Association
(NYHA) class II–IV heart failure The effi cacy of
adding a beta blocker to standard therapy for heart
failure is less certain in children and adolescents and
in patients with a reduced ejection fraction who are
rate of all-cause mortality.6
Dosage – Beta blockers should be started at low
doses and increased gradually, usually at 2-week
intervals, to the highest tolerated dose Full clinical
benefi ts may not occur for 3-6 months or more
Cautions – Beta blockers should be used cautiously, if at
all, in patients with asthma or severe bradycardia
Adverse Effects – Fatigue, hypotension,
brady-cardia, asymptomatic fluid retention, and worsening heart failure may occur during the fi rst 2-4 weeks of treatment Increasing the dose of a concurrent diuretic may be helpful for fluid retention
Choice of a Beta Blocker – Carvedilol, extended-release
metoprolol succinate, and bisoprolol have been shown
to reduce mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction Bisoprolol
is not approved by the FDA for treatment of heart failure There is no defi nitive clinical trial comparing extended-release metoprolol succinate with carvedilol Carvedilol has been shown to reduce the incidence of
extended-release metoprolol succinate are once-daily dosing, less hypotension, and more selective beta-1 blockade that may reduce the risk of bronchospasm
ALDOSTERONE ANTAGONISTS — The addition of an
aldosterone antagonist is recommended for patients with NYHA Class II-IV heart failure with a LVEF
≤35% When added to standard therapy in patients with heart failure, aldosterone antagonists have been shown to reduce the risk of hospitalization and
in patients with heart failure after myocardial infarction, one study found that eplerenone signifi cantly reduced the primary endpoints of all-cause mortality and mortality or hospitalization for
adding an aldosterone antagonist after an acute myocardial infarction in patients with heart failure symptoms and an LVEF ≤40%
In a study in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, spironolactone improved non-invasive measures of diastolic function, but it did not
trial, use of spironolactone did not signifi cantly reduce the incidence of the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, cardiac arrest, or heart failure
Cautions – Aldosterone antagonists should be avoided
in patients with serum potassium >5.0 mEq/L and in those with reduced renal function (baseline serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL for women or >2.5 mg/dL for
function and serum creatinine concentrations should
be monitored during treatment
Adverse Effects – Hyperkalemia occurs frequently with
Trang 4Table 1 Some Drugs for Chronic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction 1
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors
Captopril 5 – generic 12.5, 25, 50, 100 mg tabs 6.25 mg tid 50 mg tid $130.00 4
Enalapril – generic 2.5, 5, 10, 20 mg tabs 2.5 mg bid 20 mg bid 12.00 4
Fosinopril 5 – generic 10, 20, 40 mg tabs 5-10 mg once/d 40 mg once/d 10.40 Lisinopril – generic 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 mg tabs 2.5-5 mg once/d 40 mg once/d 1.80
Perindopril* – generic 2, 4, 8 mg tabs 2 mg once/d 16 mg once/d 20.20
Quinapril – generic 5, 10, 20, 40 mg tabs 5 mg bid 20 mg bid 24.10
Ramipril – generic 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 mg caps 1.25-2.5 mg once/d 10 mg once/d 9.70
Trandolapril – generic 1, 2, 4 mg tabs 1 mg once/d 4 mg once/d 17.20
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs)
Azilsartan medoxomil* –
Edarbi (Arbor) 40, 80 mg tabs 40-80 mg once/d 80 mg once/d 135.60 Candesartan cilexetil – generic 4, 8, 16, 32 mg tabs 4-8 mg once/d 32 mg once/d 103.10
Losartan* – generic 25, 50, 100 mg tabs 25-50 mg once/d 150 mg once/d 6.00
Valsartan 5 – generic 40, 80, 160, 320 mg tabs 20-40 mg bid 160 mg bid 264.40
Beta-Adrenergic Blockers
Bisoprolol* – generic 5, 10 mg tabs 5 1.25 mg once/d 10 mg once/d 24.50
Carvedilol – generic 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25 mg tabs 3.125 mg bid 25 mg bid 5.40 4
extended-release – Coreg CR 10, 20, 40, 80 mg ER caps 10 mg once/d 80 mg once/d 173.60 Metoprolol succinate ER –
generic 25, 50, 100, 200 mg ER tabs 5 12.5-25 mg once/d 200 mg once/d 50.20
Aldosterone Antagonists
Eplerenone – generic 25, 50 mg tabs 25 mg once/d 6 50 mg once/d 6 104.10
Spironolactone 5 – generic 25, 50, 100 mg tabs 12.5-25 mg once/d 6 25 mg once/d or bid 6 5.80 4
Vasodilators
Isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine 7 –
BiDil (Arbor)8 20/37.5 mg tabs 20 mg/37.5 mg tid 40 mg/75 mg tid 228.60
Loop Diuretics
Bumetanide – generic 0.5, 1, 2 mg tabs 0.5-1 mg once/d or bid 10 mg once/d or 117.80 4
in divided doses Furosemide – generic 20, 40, 80 mg tabs 20-40 mg once/d or bid 600 mg once/d or 192.00 4
Torsemide – generic 5, 10, 20, 100 mg tabs 10-20 mg once/d 200 mg once/d or 73.60
Digitalis Glycoside
Digoxin – generic 0.125, 0.25 mg tabs 0.125 mg once/d 0.125-0.25 mg once/d 36.10 4
Lanoxin (Covis) 0.0625, 0.125, 0.1875, 0.25 mg tabs or once every other day 67.80
ER = extended-release
* Not approved by the FDA for treatment of heart failure.
1 For treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
2 Dosage adjustment may be needed for hepatic or renal impairment.
3 Approximate WAC for 30 days’ treatment at the lowest maximum dosage WAC = wholesaler acquisition cost or manufacturer’s published price to
wholesalers; WAC represents a published catalogue or list price and may not represent an actual transactional price Source: AnalySource® Monthly January
5, 2015 Reprinted with permission by First Databank, Inc All rights reserved ©2015 www.fdbhealth.com/policies/drug-pricing-policy.
4 A 30-day supply costs $4.00 at some large discount pharmacies.
5 Available as scored tablets.
6 For patients with an eGFR ≥50 mL/min/1.73 m 2 For patients with an eGFR 30-49 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , the initial dose is 25 mg every other day for eplerenone and 12.5 mg once daily or every other day for spironolactone and the maintenance dose is 25 mg once daily for eplerenone and 12.5-25 mg once daily for spironolactone
7 Both of these drugs are available generically as single agents Isosorbide dinitrate is available in 5, 10, 20, and 30-mg tablets and hydralazine in 10, 25, 50, and 100-mg tablets.
8 FDA-approved as adjunctive therapy for treatment of heart failure in black patients.
Trang 5addition of an aldosterone antagonist can sometimes overcome diuretic resistance
Adverse Effects – The most common adverse effect
of diuretic therapy is hypokalemia Diuretics can also cause worsening of renal function
Choice of a Diuretic – Torsemide is better absorbed
than furosemide and has a longer duration of action, but there is no clinical evidence that torsemide or bumetanide is more effective than furosemide, which has been in use much longer
DIGOXIN — Digoxin can decrease the symptoms of
heart failure, increase exercise tolerance, and decrease the rate of hospitalization, but it does not prolong survival
Dosage – A low dose of digoxin (0.125 mg/d) is
generally recommended for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction Dose adjustments based
on renal function, age, and concomitant medications may be required Digoxin levels of 0.5-0.9 ng/mL are recommended
Adverse Effects – The most common adverse effects
of digoxin are conduction disturbances, cardiac arrhythmias, nausea, vomiting, confusion, and visual disturbances
OTHER DRUGS — A large trial in patients with NYHA
class II-IV systolic heart failure (GISSI-HF) found
that the addition of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids
1 gram daily to standard therapy for a median of 3.9 years modestly reduced all-cause mortality and
Aliskiren (Tekturna) is a direct renin inhibitor approved
for treatment of hypertension Although it offers the theoretical benefi t of upstream renin-angiotensin system inhibition, one study in patients hospitalized for heart failure found that addition of aliskiren to standard therapy did not reduce cardiovascular death
or rehospitalization for heart failure at 6 months or 12
Sacubitril plus Valsartan – A recent trial
(PARADIGM-HF) found that the combination of the investigational neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril and the ARB valsartan was superior to the ACE inhibitor enalapril alone
in reducing the rate of death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure, the primary composite endpoint, in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.19,20 ■
also taking an ACE inhibitor or an ARB, and in those with
renal impairment Spironolactone has anti-androgenic
activity and can cause erectile dysfunction and painful
gynecomastia in men and menstrual irregularities
in women; the incidence of these effects has been
reported to be lower with eplerenone
Choice of an Aldosterone Antagonist – Eplerenone
may be similar in effectiveness to spironolactone and
may have less anti-androgenic activity, but it costs
much more Comparative studies of their use in heart
failure are lacking
VASODILATORS — Use of hydralazine plus isosorbide
dinitrate may be benefi cial for some patients The
addition of a fi xed-dose combination of
hydrala-zine and isosorbide dinitrate (BiDil) to standard
therapy in African-American patients who remained
symptomatic despite standard therapy signifi cantly
non-African-American patients is less well established, but
the combination can be considered in those intolerant
to an ACE inhibitor or an ARB or in those who need
additional blood pressure control despite maximal
doses of standard therapy
Adverse Effects – Hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate
frequently causes headache and dizziness
Hydrala-zine alone can cause tachycardia, peripheral neuritis,
and a lupus-like syndrome Phosphodiesterase
inhibitors, such as sildenafi l (Viagra, Revatio, and
generics), should not be taken concurrently with
hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate because of the risk of
additive hypotension
DIURETICS — Most patients with heart failure have
fluid retention In such patients, diuretics relieve
symptoms, but their effect on survival is unknown
Diuretics provide symptomatic relief of pulmonary and
peripheral edema more rapidly than other drugs used
for the treatment of heart failure Diuretics that act on
the loop of Henle, such as furosemide, bumetanide,
or torsemide, are more effective for treatment of
heart failure than thiazide-type diuretics, such as
hydrochlorothiazide or chlorthalidone, which act on
the distal tubule
Dosage – Diuretics should be started at a low dose,
which can be titrated upward until urine output
increases and weight decreases Patients with renal
dysfunction or prior refractoriness to loop diuretics can
be started at higher doses Intravenous administration,
concurrent use of 2 diuretics (1 loop, 1 thiazide-like), or
Trang 61 CW Yancy et al 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management
of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology
Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice
guidelines Circulation 2013; 128:e240.
2 J Lindenfeld et al HFSA 2010 comprehensive heart failure
practice guideline J Card Fail 2010; 16:e1.
3 H Svanström et al Association of treatment with losartan vs
candesartan and mortality among patients with heart failure
JAMA 2012; 307:1506.
4 MA Konstam et al Effects of high-dose versus low-dose
losartan on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure
(HEAAL study): a randomised, double-blind trial Lancet 2009;
374:1840.
5 RE Shaddy et al Carvedilol for children and adolescents
with heart failure: a randomized controlled trial JAMA 2007;
298:1171.
6 LH Lund et al Association between use of β-blockers and
outcomes in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection
fraction JAMA 2014; 312:2008.
7 C Torp-Pederson et al Effects of metoprolol and carvedilol on
pre-existing and new onset diabetes in patients with chronic
heart failure: data from the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European
Trial (COMET) Heart 2007; 93:968.
8 MH Ruwald Impact of carvedilol and metoprolol on
inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defi brillator therapy:
the MADIT-CRT trial (Multicenter Automatic Defi brillator
Implantation with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) J Am
Coll Cardiol 2013; 62:1343.
9 G Sayer and G Bhat The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system
and heart failure Cardiol Clin 2014; 32:21.
10 F Zannad et al Eplerenone in patients with systolic heart failure
and mild symptoms N Engl J Med 2011; 364:11.
11 B Pitt et al The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and
mortality in patients with severe heart failure Randomized
Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators N Engl J Med 1999;
341:709.
12 B Pitt et al Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in
patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial
infarction N Engl J Med 2003; 348:1309.
13 F Edelmann et al Effect of spironolactone on diastolic
function and exercise capacity in patients with heart failure
with preserved ejection fraction: the Aldo-DHF randomized
controlled trial JAMA 2013; 309: 781.
14 B Pitt et al Spironolactone for heart failure with preserved
ejection fraction N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1383.
15 KB Shah et al The adequacy of laboratory monitoring in patients
treated with spironolactone for congestive heart failure J Am
Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:845.
16 AL Taylor et al Early and sustained benefi t on event-free
survival and heart failure hospitalization from fi xed-dose
combination of isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine: consistency
across subgroups in the African-American Heart Failure Trial
Circulation 2007; 115:1747.
17 GISSI-HF Investigators et al Effect of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty
acids in patients with chronic heart failure (the GISSI-HF trial):
a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Lancet
2008; 372:1223.
18 M Gheorghiade et al Effect of aliskiren on postdischarge
mortality and heart failure readmissions among patients
hospitalized for heart failure: the ASTRONAUT randomized trial
JAMA 2013; 309:1125.
19 JJ McMurray et al Angiotensin-neprilysin versus enalapril in
heart failure N Engl J Med 2014; 371:993.
20 O Vardeny et al Combined neprilysin and renin-angiotensin
system inhibition for the treatment of heart failure JACC Heart
Fail 2014; 2:663.
Metreleptin (Myalept – Amylin), a recombinant leptin analog produced in E coli, has been approved by the
FDA to treat the complications of leptin defi ciency
in patients with congenital or acquired generalized lipodystrophy It has not been approved to date for the treatment of partial lipodystrophies, including those associated with the use of protease inhibitors in patients with HIV Metreleptin is approved in Japan for the treatment of any lipodystrophy disorder
Metreleptin (Myalept) – A Leptin
Analog for Generalized Lipodystrophy
▶
LEPTIN — Leptin is a protein hormone secreted by
adipose tissue that acts on the hypothalamus to induce satiety In patients with leptin defi ciency, exogenous leptin administration results in weight loss and reductions in blood insulin, glucose, and triglyceride levels It has not been effective in treating ordinary obesity
CLINICAL STUDIES — FDA approval of metreleptin was
based on an unpublished, open-label, single-arm clinical trial (summarized in the package insert) in 48 patients with congenital or acquired generalized lipodystrophy and diabetes mellitus, hypertriglyceridemia, and/or
Table 1 Pharmacology
Drug class Leptin analog Route Subcutaneous Formulation 11.3 mg lyophilized powder
(5 mg/mL after reconstitution)
Half-life 3.8-4.7 hours in healthy subjects Elimination Primarily renal
Pronunciation Key Metreleptin: met' re lep' tin Myalept: mye' a lept'
THE DISORDER — Generalized lipodystrophy is a rare
Congenital and acquired generalized lipodystrophy are characterized by a near total lack of adipose tissue Fat is deposited ectopically in muscle and liver tissue and can cause metabolic complications including insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, diabetes mellitus, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Severe hypertri-glyceridemia is common in patients with generalized lipodystrophy and can lead to acute pancreatitis The metabolic abnormalities associated with generalized li-podystrophy are often aggravated by overconsumption
HIV-associated lipodystrophy, the most common form
of lipodystrophy, is also associated with reduced leptin levels, dyslipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and insulin resistance
Trang 7hyperinsulinemia Compared to baseline, mean HbA1c
and fasting glucose levels and median fasting triglyceride
levels were all signifi cantly reduced after 12 months
of therapy with metreleptin Earlier small uncontrolled
clinical trials in patients with generalized lipodystrophy
produced similar results Some other small studies
have found that metreleptin can correct metabolic
abnormalities and decrease truncal fat mass in patients
ADVERSE EFFECTS — The most common adverse effects
reported in patients taking metreleptin have been
head-ache, hypoglycemia, weight loss, and abdominal pain A
boxed warning states that anti-metreleptin antibodies,
serious infections, and worsening metabolic control have
been reported in patients taking the drug, and that some
patients with acquired generalized lipodystrophy taking
metreleptin (as well as some not taking the drug) have
developed T-cell lymphoma As part of a Risk Evaluation
and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), the FDA has required
healthcare providers to be trained in the use of metreleptin
before prescribing it and to attest that patients for whom
they prescribe metreleptin have a labeled indication for
the drug Metreleptin is classifi ed as category C (no
ad-equate studies in women) for use during pregnancy
DOSAGE, ADMINISTRATION, AND COST — Metreleptin
is administered subcutaneously once daily at starting
doses of 0.06 mg/kg, 2.5 mg, and 5 mg for patients ≤40 kg,
males >40 kg, and females >40 kg, respectively, and
may be titrated to a maximum daily dose of 0.13 mg/kg
in patients ≤40 kg or 10 mg in those >40 kg The drug is
available in vials containing 11.3 mg of metreleptin as a
lyophilized powder, which should be refrigerated during
storage Each vial is reconstituted with 2.2 mL of sterile
water for injection (WFI) or sterile bacteriostatic water
for injection (BWFI) to a fi nal concentration of 5 mg/mL
If reconstituted with BWFI, metreleptin solution can
be refrigerated and used within 3 days of preparation;
solution prepared with WFI must be used immediately
or discarded Neonates and infants should not receive
metreleptin solution prepared with BWFI because of its
benzyl alcohol content A 30-day supply of Myalept at a
CONCLUSION — The results of an unpublished,
single-arm, open-label trial indicate that the leptin analog
metreleptin (Myalept) can ameliorate the metabolic
abnormalities found in patients with generalized
lipodystrophy, but controlled trials are lacking and
the drug’s long-term safety is unknown Metreleptin
may also be effective in treating HIV-associated
lipodystrophy, but more data are needed, and it has not
1 A Garg Acquired and inherited lipodystrophies N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1220.
2 MA Tsoukas et al Leptin in congenital and HIV-associated lipo-dystrophy Metabolism 2015; 64:47.
3 Approximate WAC for 30 days’ treatment WAC = wholesaler acquisition cost, or manufacturer’s published price to whole-salers; WAC represents published catalogue or list prices and may not represent actual transactional prices Source: Analy-Source® Monthly January 5, 2015 Reprinted with permission
by First Databank, Inc All rights reserved ©2015 www.fdb-health.com/policies/drug-pricing-policy.
IN BRIEF
Concerns about Oseltamivir (Tamiflu)
Some readers of our article on Antiviral Drugs for Seasonal Influenza1 have expressed concerns regarding our recommendation for use of the oral neuraminidase
inhibitor oseltamivir (Tamiflu) to treat high-risk patients
with confi rmed or suspected influenza illness, citing the
British Medical Journal and The Cochrane Collaboration,
which have contended that there is no acceptable evidence that the drug prevents complications or hospitalizations and have questioned the completeness
of the results of controlled trials conducted by the manufacturer (Roche).2
Randomized controlled trials, mainly in patients with mild influenza illness, have shown that treatment
with oseltamivir or zanamivir (Relenza), an inhaled
neuraminidase inhibitor, started within 48 hours of the onset of illness can shorten the duration of symptoms
by about one day Most controlled trials of the effectiveness of these drugs in preventing pneumonia or other serious complications of influenza have not been powered adequately to provide convincing evidence of effi cacy, but a broad consensus of expert clinicians has interpreted the combined results of controlled trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses as showing that early antiviral treatment of high-risk patients with influenza can reduce the risk of complications such as pneumonia, respiratory failure, and death.3,4
Influenza kills about 50,000 patients annually in the US Oseltamivir and zanamivir are generally well tolerated, and there is no alternative treatment (Since this article
was fi rst posted online, peramivir (Rapivab), an IV
neur-aminidase inhibitor, has been approved by the FDA It will be reviewed in our February 2, 2015 issue.)
1 Antiviral drugs for seasonal influenza 2014-2015 Med Lett Drugs Ther 2014; 56:121.
2 T Jefferson et al Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults and children Cochrane Data-base Syst Rev 2014; 4:CD008965.
3 CDC Influenza antiviral medications: summary for clinicians Available at http://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/antivirals/ summary-clinicians.htm Accessed December 23, 2014
4 IDSA Statement by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA)
on the recent publication on "Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults and children." April 2014 Available at: http://www.idsociety.org/Influenza_Statement.aspx Accessed December 23, 2014.
Trang 8Questions start on next page
Choose CME from The Medical Letter in the format that’s right for you!
▶ Comprehensive Exam – Available online or in print to Medical Letter subscribers, this 78 question test enables you to earn 13 credits immediately
upon successful completion of the test A score of 70% or greater is required to pass the exam Our comprehensive exams allow you to test at your own pace in the comfort of your home or offi ce Comprehensive tests are offered every January and July enabling you to earn up to 26 credits per year Starting with our January 2015 comprehensive exam, there will be 130 questions, enabling you to earn 26 credits upon successful completion
of the test (or up to 52 credits if also taking the July 2015 exam) $49/exam.
▶ Free Individual Exams– Free to active subscribers of The Medical Letter Answer 10 questions per issue and submit answers online Earn two credits/exam.
▶ Paid Individual Exams – Available to non-subscribers Answer 10 questions per issue and submit answers online Earn two credits/exam $12/exam.
ACCREDITATION INFORMATION:
ACCME: The Medical Letter is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians The Medical
Letter designates this enduring material for a maximum of 2 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™ Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity This CME activity was planned and produced in accordance with the ACCME Essentials and Policies.
AAFP : This enduring material activity, The Medical Letter Continuing Medical Education Program, has been reviewed and is acceptable for up to 52 Prescribed credits by the
American Academy of Family Physicians Term of approval begins January 1, 2015 Term of approval is for one year from this date Credit may be claimed for one year from the date of each issue Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity
ACPE: The Medical Letter is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education This exam is acceptable
for 2.0 hour(s) of knowledge-based continuing education credit (0.2 CEU)
The American Academy of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) and the American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA) accept AMA Category 1 credit for the Physician’s
Recognition Award from organizations accredited by the ACCME.
This activity, being ACCME (AMA) approved, is acceptable for Category 2-B credit by the American Osteopathic Association (AOA)
Physician Assistants: The National Commission on Certifi cation of Physician Assistants (NCCPA) accepts AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ from organizations accredited by
ACCME NCCPA also accepts AAFP Prescribed credits for recertifi cation The Medical Letter is accredited by both ACCME and AAFP.
Physicians in Canada: Members of The College of Family Physicians of Canada are eligible to receive Mainpro-M1 credits (equivalent to AAFP Prescribed credits) as per our
reciprocal agreement with the American Academy of Family Physicians
MISSION:
The mission of The Medical Letter’s Continuing Medical Education Program is to support the professional development of healthcare providers including physicians, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and physician assistants by providing independent, unbiased drug information and prescribing recommendations that are free of industry influence The program content includes current information and unbiased reviews of FDA-approved and off-label uses of drugs, their mechanisms of action, clinical trials, dosage and administration, adverse effects, and drug interactions The Medical Letter delivers educational content in the form of self-study material.
The expected outcome of the CME program is to increase the participant’s ability to know, or apply knowledge into practice after assimilating, information presented in
materials contained in The Medical Letter.
The Medical Letter will strive to continually improve the CME program through periodic assessment of the program and activities The Medical Letter aims to be a leader in supporting the professional development of healthcare providers through Core Competencies by providing continuing medical education that is unbiased and free of industry influence The Medical Letter is supported solely by subscription fees and accepts no advertising, grants, or donations.
GOAL:
Through this program, The Medical Letter expects to provide the healthcare community with unbiased, reliable, and timely educational content that they will use to make independent and informed therapeutic choices in their practice.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
Activity participants will read and assimilate unbiased reviews of FDA-approved and off-label uses of drugs and other treatment modalities Activity participants will be
able to select and prescribe, or confi rm the appropriateness of the prescribed usage of, the drugs and other therapeutic modalities discussed in The Medical Letter with
specifi c attention to clinical trials, pathophysiology, dosage and administration, drug metabolism and interactions, and patient management Activity participants will make independent and informed therapeutic choices in their practice.
Upon completion of this program, the participant will be able to:
1 Explain the current approach to the management of chronic heart failure.
2 Discuss the pharmacologic options available for treatment of chronic heart failure and compare them based on their effi cacy, dosage and administration, and potential adverse effects.
3 Determine the most appropriate therapy given the clinical presentation of an individual patient with chronic heart failure.
4 Review the effi cacy and safety of metreleptin (Myalept) for treatment of leptin defi ciency in patients with congenital or acquired generalized lipodystrophy.
Privacy and Confi dentiality: The Medical Letter guarantees our fi rm commitment to your privacy We do not sell any of your information Secure server software (SSL) is used
for commerce transactions through VeriSign, Inc No credit card information is stored.
IT Requirements: Windows XP/Vista/7/8, Mac OS X+; current versions of Microsoft IE, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Safari, or any other compatible web browser
High-speed connection.
Have any questions? Call us at 800-211-2769 or 914-235-0500 or e-mail us at: custserv@medicalletter.org
medicalletter.org/cme
Earn Up To 52 Credits Per Year
Trang 9The Medical Letter ®
Online Continuing Medical Education
DO NOT FAX OR MAIL THIS EXAM
To take CME exams and earn credit, go to:
medicalletter.org/CMEstatus Issue 1460 Questions
(Correspond to questions #11-20 in Comprehensive Exam #72, available July 2015)
7 A 59-year-old white man presents post-MI with heart failure symptoms and a LVEF of 29% He is currently being treated with
an ACE inhibitor and extended-release metoprolol succinate Addition of which of the following drugs has been shown to prolong survival in such a patient?
a digoxin
b hydrochlorothiazide
c eplerenone
d hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate
8 A 68-year-old white man with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction being treated with enalapril and carvedilol comes to your offi ce complaining of shortness of breath On physical examination, he has bilateral rales and edema in both lower extremities Which of the following would you recommend for acute relief of symptoms in this patient?
a a combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate
b valsartan
c a loop diuretic
d digoxin
Metreleptin (Myalept) – A Leptin Analog for Generalized
Lipodystrophy
9 Metreleptin (Myalept) has been approved by the FDA for treatment of:
a any partial lipodystrophy
b lipodystrophy associated with use of protease inhibitors in patients with HIV
c congenital or acquired generalized lipodystrophy
d all of the above
10 Adverse effects of metreleptin have included:
a hypoglycemia
b weight loss
c abdominal pain
d all of the above
Drugs for Chronic Heart Failure
1 In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, ACE
inhibitors have been shown to:
a improve symptoms
b decrease hospitalizations
c prolong survival
d all of the above
2 The most common adverse effect of ACE inhibitors is:
a cough
b angioedema
c hypokalemia
d dizziness
3 ARBs:
a are less effective than ACE inhibitors for treatment of
chronic heart failure
b are more likely than ACE inhibitors to cause angioedema
c do not cause cough
d all of the above
4 Potential advantages of extended-release metoprolol succinate
over carvedilol include:
a less hypotension
b a lower risk of bronchospasm
c once-daily dosing
d all of the above
5 Hyperkalemia can occur with:
a ACE inhibitors
b ARBs
c aldosterone antagonists
d all of the above
6 In patients with heart failure, digoxin has not been shown to:
a improve symptoms
b decrease hospitalizations
c prolong survival
d all of the above
ACPE UPN: Per Issue Exam: 0379-0000-15-460-H01-P; Release: January 19, 2015, Expire: January 19, 2016 Comprehensive Exam 72: 0379-0000-15-072-H01-P; Release: July 2015, Expire: July 2016
EDITOR IN CHIEF: Mark Abramowicz, M.D.; EXECUTIVE EDITOR: Gianna Zuccotti, M.D., M.P.H., F.A.C.P., Harvard Medical School; EDITOR: Jean-Marie Pflomm, Pharm.D.; ASSISTANT EDITORS, DRUG INFORMATION: Susan M Daron, Pharm.D., Corinne Z Morrison, Pharm.D., Michael P Viscusi, Pharm.D.; CONSULTING EDITORS: Brinda M Shah, Pharm.D.,
F Peter Swanson, M.D; SENIOR ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Amy Faucard
CONTRIBUTING EDITORS: Carl W Bazil, M.D., Ph.D., Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; Vanessa K Dalton, M.D., M.P.H., University of Michigan Medical
School; Eric J Epstein, M.D., Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Jane P Gagliardi, M.D., M.H.S., F.A.C.P., Duke University School of Medicine; Jules Hirsch, M.D., Rockefeller University; David N Juurlink, BPhm, M.D., Ph.D., Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Richard B Kim, M.D., University of Western Ontario; Hans Meinertz, M.D., University Hospital, Copenhagen; Sandip K Mukherjee, M.D., F.A.C.C., Yale School of Medicine; Dan M Roden, M.D., Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Esperance A.K Schaefer, M.D., M.P.H., Harvard Medical School; F Estelle R Simons, M.D., University of Manitoba; Neal H Steigbigel, M.D., New York University School of Medicine; Arthur M F Yee, M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.R.,
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
MANAGING EDITOR: Susie Wong; ASSISTANT MANAGING EDITOR: Liz Donohue; EDITORIAL ASSISTANT: Cheryl Brown
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF SALES: Gene Carbona; FULFILLMENT & SYSTEMS MANAGER: Cristine Romatowski; DIRECTOR OF MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS: Joanne F Valentino; VICE PRESIDENT AND PUBLISHER: Yosef Wissner-Levy
Founded in 1959 by Arthur Kallet and Harold Aaron, M.D.
Copyright and Disclaimer: The Medical Letter, Inc is an independent nonprofi t organization that provides healthcare professionals with unbiased drug prescribing recommendations The editorial
process used for its publications relies on a review of published and unpublished literature, with an emphasis on controlled clinical trials, and on the opinions of its consultants The Medical Letter, Inc is supported solely by subscription fees and accepts no advertising, grants, or donations No part of the material may be reproduced or transmitted by any process in whole or in part without resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission.
Subscription Services
The Medical Letter, Inc Call: 800-211-2769 or 914-235-0500 To reproduce any portion of this issue, 1 year - $98; 2 years - $189; E-mail: info@medicalletter.org
145 Huguenot St Ste 312 Fax: 914-632-1733 please e-mail your request to: 3 years - $279 $49 per year Call: 800-211-2769 ext 315 New Rochelle, NY 10801-7537 E-mail: custserv@medicalletter.org permissions@medicalletter.org for students, interns, residents, and Special rates available for bulk www.medicalletter.org fellows in the US and Canada subscriptions.
Reprints - $12 each