1. Trang chủ
  2. » Tất cả

The medical letter on drugs and therapeutics august 3 2015

9 195 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 9
Dung lượng 244,49 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Rifaximin Xifaxan for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea ...p 107p 109 Polidocanol Varithena for Varicose Veins ...p 111 In Brief: Duopa – A Carbidopa/Levodopa Enteral Suspension for

Trang 1

FORWARDING OR COPYING IS A VIOLATION OF U.S AND INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT LAWS

The Medical Letter, Inc publications are protected by U.S and international copyright laws Forwarding, copying or any distribution of this material is prohibited.

Sharing a password with a non-subscriber or otherwise making the contents of this site available to third parties is strictly prohibited.

By accessing and reading the attached content I agree to comply with U.S and international copyright laws and these terms and conditions of The Medical Letter, Inc.

or call customer service at: 800-211-2769

Important Copyright Message

IN THIS ISSUE

ISSUE

1433

Volume 56

Published by The Medical Letter, Inc • A Nonprofi t Organization

ISSUE No

1474 Sacubitril/Valsartan (Entresto) for Heart Failure . Rifaximin (Xifaxan) for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea p 107p 109

Polidocanol (Varithena) for Varicose Veins p 111

In Brief: Duopa – A Carbidopa/Levodopa Enteral Suspension for Parkinson’s Disease p 112

on Drugs and Therapeutics

Objective Drug Reviews Since 1959

Trang 2

107

on Drugs and Therapeutics

Objective Drug Reviews Since 1959

Take CME Exams

ISSUE

1433

Volume 56

ISSUE No

1474 Rifaximin (Xifaxan) for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea Polidocanol (Varithena) for Varicose Veins p 109p 111

In Brief: Duopa – A Carbidopa/Levodopa Enteral Suspension for Parkinson’s Disease p 112

ALSO IN THIS ISSUE

The FDA has approved Entresto (Novartis), an oral

fi xed-dose combination of the neprilysin inhibitor

sacubitril and the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)

valsartan, to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death

and heart failure hospitalization in patients with

heart failure with reduced ejection fraction Sacubitril

is the fi rst neprilysin inhibitor to become available in

the US

(Vasotec, and generics) 10 mg twice daily, both in

addition to other drugs The study was stopped early because a prespecifi ed interim analysis showed lower cardiovascular mortality in patients

randomized to Entresto After a median follow-up

of 27 months, the primary endpoint, a composite of

fi rst hospitalization for worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death, occurred in signifi cantly fewer patients taking the combination compared to those taking enalapril (21.8% vs 26.5%) The combination signifi cantly reduced the risk of fi rst hospitalization for worsening heart failure (12.8% vs 15.6%), death from cardiovascular causes (13.3% vs 16.5%), and all-cause mortality (17.0% vs 19.8%).3 It also slowed the progression of heart failure.4

ADVERSE EFFECTS — Hypotension and hyperkalemia

were the most common adverse effects in the clinical trial; symptomatic hypotension occurred

in 14% of patients taking Entresto, even though the

study excluded those with baseline hypotension Cough (11.3%) and elevated serum creatinine (3.3%) occurred in patients treated with the combination, but less frequently than with enalapril Neprilysin inhibition can cause angioedema, which occurred

in 0.5% of patients treated with the combination compared to 0.2% of those treated with enalapril

Sacubitril/Valsartan (Entresto) for

Heart Failure

Pronunciation Key Sacubitril: sak ue’ bi tril Entresto: en tress’ toh

Valsartan: val sar’ tan Neprilysin: nep" ri lye' sin

STANDARD TREATMENT — Patients with symptomatic

heart failure with reduced ejection fraction generally

take an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor,

a beta blocker, and an aldosterone antagonist If

volume overloaded, they may take a diuretic as well

An ARB is recommended for patients who cannot

tolerate an ACE inhibitor.1

MECHANISM OF ACTION — Neprilysin is a neutral

endopeptidase that degrades some vasoactive

pep-tides, including natriuretic peppep-tides, bradykinin, and

adrenomedullin Inhibition of neprilysin by LBQ657, the

active metabolite of sacubitril, increases the levels of

these peptides, decreasing vasoconstriction, sodium

retention, and maladaptive remodeling Valsartan

blocks the angiotensin II type-1 (AT1)receptor, inhibiting

angiotensin II and the release of aldosterone.2

CLINICAL STUDIES — Approval of Entresto was

based on a double-blind trial (PARADIGM-HF) in

8442 patients with class II-IV heart failure and a

reduced ejection fraction who were randomized

to Entresto 200 mg (sacubitril 97 mg/valsartan

103 mg) twice daily or the ACE inhibitor enalapril

Table 1 Pharmacology

Class Angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor Formulation Sacubitril/valsartan - 24/26 mg, 49/51 mg,

97/103 mg tablets Route Oral Tmax 0.5 hrs (sacubitril); 2 hrs (LBQ657) 1 ;

1.5 hrs (valsartan) Elimination Sacubitril (52-68% urine; 37-48% feces);

Valsartan (~13% urine; 86% feces) Half-life 1.4 hrs (sacubitril); 11.5 hrs (LBQ657) 1 ;

9.9 hrs (valsartan)

1 Active metabolite of sacubitril.

Trang 3

The Medical Letter ® Vol 57 (1474) August 3, 2015

Table 2 Some Drugs for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors

Captopril – generic 12.5, 25, 50, 100 mg tabs 3 6.25 mg tid 50 mg tid $151.50 Enalapril – generic 2.5, 5, 10, 20 mg tabs 2.5 mg bid 20 mg bid 39.90

Fosinopril – generic 10, 20, 40 mg tabs 3 5-10 mg once/d 40 mg once/d 10.40 Lisinopril – generic 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 mg tabs 2.5-5 mg once/d 40 mg once/d 2.70

Prinivil (Merck) 5, 10, 20 mg tabs 94.10

Zestril (Almatica) 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 mg tabs 48.00 Perindopril erbumine 4 – generic 2, 4, 8 mg tabs 2 mg once/d 16 mg once/d 37.30

Quinapril – generic 5, 10, 20, 40 mg tabs 5 mg bid 20 mg bid 23.60

Ramipril – generic 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 mg caps 1.25-2.5 mg once/d 10 mg once/d 15.80

Trandolapril – generic 1, 2, 4 mg tabs 1 mg once/d 4 mg once/d 16.20

Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs)

Azilsartan medoxomil 4 – Edarbi (Arbor) 40, 80 mg tabs 40-80 mg once/d 80 mg once/d 162.60 Candesartan cilexetil – generic 4, 8, 16, 32 mg tabs 4-8 mg once/d 32 mg once/d 103.30

Losartan 4 – generic 25, 50, 100 mg tabs 25-50 mg once/d 150 mg once/d 16.20

Valsartan – generic 40, 80, 160, 320 mg tabs 3 20-40 mg bid 160 mg bid 52.40

Beta-Adrenergic Blockers

Bisoprolol 4 – generic 5, 10 mg tabs 3 1.25 mg once/d 10 mg once/d 24.60

Carvedilol – generic 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25 mg tabs 3.125 mg bid 25 mg bid 14.70

Coreg (GSK) (50 mg bid for pts >85kg) 218.70

extended-release – Coreg CR 10, 20, 40, 80 mg ER caps 10 mg once/d 80 mg once/d 219.60 Metoprolol succinate ER – generic 25, 50, 100, 200 mg ER tabs 3 12.5-25 mg once/d 200 mg once/d 45.00

Aldosterone Antagonists

Eplerenone – generic 25, 50 mg tabs 25 mg once/d 5 50 mg once/d 5 104.10

Spironolactone – generic 25, 50, 100 mg tabs 3 12.5-25 mg once/d 5 25 mg once/d or bid 5 6.30

Vasodilators

Isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine 6 –

BiDil (Arbor)7 20/37.5 mg tabs 20 mg/37.5 mg tid 40 mg/75 mg tid 528.70

Loop Diuretics

Bumetanide – generic 0.5, 1, 2 mg tabs 0.5-1 mg once/d or bid 10 mg once/d or 166.10

in divided doses Furosemide – generic 20, 40, 80 mg tabs 20-40 mg once/d or bid 600 mg once/d or 31.10

Lasix (Sanofi ) in divided doses 274.50 Torsemide – generic 5, 10, 20, 100 mg tabs 10-20 mg once/d 200 mg once/d or 54.20

Demadex (Meda) in divided doses 585.00

Digitalis Glycoside

Digoxin – generic 0.125, 0.25 mg tabs 0.125 mg once/d 0.125-0.25 mg once/d 16.70

Lanoxin (Covis) 0.0625, 0.125, 0.1875, 0.25 mg tabs or once every other day 34.80

Hyperpolarization-Activated Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channel Blocker

Ivabradine – Corlanor (Amgen) 5, 7.5 mg tabs 2.5-5 mg bid 7.5 mg bid 375.00

Angiotensin-Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor

Sacubitril/valsartan – Entresto (Novartis) 24/26, 49/51, 97/103 mg tabs 49/51 mg bid 8 97/103 mg bid 375.00 9

ER = extended-release

1 Dosage adjustment may be needed for hepatic or renal impairment.

2 Approximate WAC for 30 days’ treatment at the lowest usual maximum adult dosage WAC = wholesaler acquisition cost or manufacturer’s published price to wholesalers; WAC represents a published catalogue or list price and may not represent an actual transactional price Source: AnalySource® Monthly July 5,

2015 Reprinted with permission by First Databank, Inc All rights reserved ©2015 www.fdbhealth.com/policies/drug-pricing-policy.

3 Available as scored tablets.

4 Not approved by the FDA for treatment of heart failure.

5 For patients with an eGFR ≥50 mL/min/1.73 m 2 For patients with an eGFR 30-49 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , the initial dose is 25 mg every other day for eplerenone and 12.5 mg once daily or every other day for spironolactone and the maintenance dose is 25 mg once daily for eplerenone and 12.5-25 mg once daily for spironolactone

6 Both of these drugs are available generically as single agents Isosorbide dinitrate is available in 5, 10, 20, and 30-mg tablets and hydralazine in 10, 25, 50, and 100-mg tablets.

7 FDA-approved as adjunctive therapy for treatment of heart failure in black patients.

8 For patients with an eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or for those with moderate hepatic impairment, the dose is 24/26 mg bid.

9 WAC according to the manufacturer.

Trang 4

PREGNANCY — ARBs should not be used during

pregnancy because they can reduce fetal renal function

and increase fetal and neonatal morbidity and death

DRUG INTERACTIONS — Concurrent use of Entresto

with an ACE inhibitor is contraindicated because

of the risk of serious angioedema, which occurs

more often in black patients Concurrent use of the

combination with potassium-sparing diuretics or

potassium supplements could lead to hyperkalemia,

especially in patients with renal impairment, diabetes,

or hypoaldosteronism Worsening of renal function

and acute renal failure could occur in patients taking

Entresto and NSAIDs concurrently Lithium toxicity

has occurred in patients taking lithium and an ARB

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION — The valsartan salt

in Entresto is different from the one in Diovan; 103 mg

of valsartan in Entresto is equivalent to 160 mg of

valsartan in Diovan The recommended starting

dosage of Entresto is 49/51 mg twice daily The dose

should be doubled after 2-4 weeks as tolerated to

reach the target maintenance dosage of 97/103 mg

twice daily ACE inhibitor treatment should be stopped

for 36 hours before starting treatment with Entresto

For patients not currently taking an ACE inhibitor or

an ARB, or for those with severe renal impairment

(eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) or moderate hepatic

impairment, the starting dosage of Entresto is 24/26

mg twice daily The dose should be doubled every 2-4

weeks as tolerated to reach a fi nal dose of 97/103

mg Entresto is not recommended for patients with

severe hepatic impairment

CONCLUSION — Entresto, a combination of the

neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril and the ARB valsartan,

was signifi cantly more effective than the ACE

inhibitor enalapril in reducing the rate of death from

cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart

failure in patients with heart failure with reduced

ejection fraction It should be considered for use

instead of an ACE inhibitor or an ARB for fi rst-line

treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection

fraction Hypotension and angioedema could be

problematic ■

1 Drugs for chronic heart failure Med Lett Drugs Ther 2015; 57:9.

2 O Vardeny et al Combined neprilysin and renin-angiotensin

system inhibition for the treatment of heart failure JACC Heart

Fail 2014; 2:663.

3 JJ McMurray et al Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus

enalapril in heart failure N Engl J Med 2014; 371:993.

4 M Packer et al Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition

com-pared with enalapril on the risk of clinical progression in

surviv-ing patients with heart failure Circulation 2015; 131:54.

Rifaximin (Xifaxan) for Irritable

Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea

Rifaximin (Xifaxan – Salix), a minimally absorbed

oral antibiotic approved previously to treat travelers’ diarrhea and to reduce the risk of recurrent hepatic encephalopathy, has now been approved by the FDA for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea

(IBS-D) Eluxadoline (Viberzi – Actavis), a mu-opioid

receptor agonist, was also recently approved for IBS-D and will be reviewed in a future issue

Pronunciation Key Rifaximin: rif ax' i min Xifaxan: zye' fax in

SOME TREATMENTS FOR IBS — Symptoms of IBS

can include abdominal pain, bloating, flatulence, diarrhea, and constipation Extra-intestinal complaints are also common IBS is subtyped, according to the predominant bowel symptom, as IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D), IBS with constipation (IBS-C), mixed-type (IBS-M), or unclassifi ed (IBS-U) The goal of treatment

is symptom control; dietary modifi cations may help improve symptoms of all subtypes of IBS

For patients with IBS-D, antidiarrheals such as

loperamide (Imodium A-D, and others), taken as

needed, may reduce stool urgency and frequency, but they have not been shown to improve other symptoms

Alosetron (Lotronex, and generics), a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist that decreases intestinal motility and pain signals, is FDA-approved for treatment of women with severe IBS-D that has not responded to conventional therapy, but its use has been limited by a risk of serious GI adverse effects including ischemic colitis Fiber is often effective in reducing overall symptoms of

IBS-C Laxatives such as polyethylene glycol (Miralax,

and others) can increase the frequency of bowel movements in patients with IBS-C, but may not improve

overall symptoms Linaclotide (Linzess), a guanylate

cyclase-C receptor agonist that increases intraluminal fluid and accelerates intestinal transit, and lubiprostone

(Amitiza), a prostaglandin derivative that stimulates

intestinal fluid secretion, can be used to treat IBS-C that has not responded to fi ber and laxatives.1,2

MECHANISM OF ACTION — Rifaximin is a minimally

absorbed, broad-spectrum antibiotic Some studies suggest that changes in gut microbiota, sometimes following a GI infection, may play a role in the development of IBS.3 The exact mechanism of action

of rifaximin for treatment of IBS-D is unclear; it alters gut microbiota and may reduce mucosal inflammation and visceral hypersensitivity.4

Trang 5

The Medical Letter ® Vol 57 (1474) August 3, 2015

CLINICAL STUDIES — In two identical double-blind

trials (TARGET 1 and 2), a total of 1260 adults with

IBS without constipation were randomized to receive

either rifaximin 550 mg three times daily or placebo

for 14 days, and were then followed for an additional

10 weeks.5 Signifi cantly more patients taking rifaximin

(40.7% vs 31.7% with placebo) had adequate relief

from IBS symptoms for at least 2 of the fi rst 4 weeks

after treatment, the primary endpoint Adequate relief

of bloating, a secondary endpoint, was reported in

signifi cantly more patients taking rifaximin (40.2% vs

30.3% with placebo) More rifaximin-treated patients

also achieved an exploratory endpoint, a composite

of a reduction in daily abdominal pain and discomfort

(≥30% decrease from baseline) and improvement in

stool consistency for ≥2 weeks during the fi rst 4 weeks

after treatment (46.6% vs 37.4% with placebo) Over

the 10 weeks of follow-up, the percentage of patients

reporting adequate symptom relief decreased in both

groups, but the rifaximin group had a signifi cantly

higher percentage of patients with adequate symptom

relief at all time points

A third trial (TARGET 3), summarized in the package

insert, evaluated retreatment with rifaximin among

adults with IBS-D whose symptoms recurred after

initially responding to a single open-label course of

the drug Among the 1074 initial responders (44% of

2438), 636 had recurrent symptoms; these patients

were randomized to 2 additional 14-day courses of

rifaximin separated by a 10-week treatment-free

period, or to placebo Signifi cantly more patients in the

rifaximin group met the primary endpoint of achieving

both a reduction in abdominal pain scores and an

improvement in stool consistency for at least 2 of the 4

weeks following the fi rst repeat treatment course (38%

vs 31% with placebo) Among patients who responded

to the fi rst repeat treatment course, 17.1% of

rifaximin-treated patients and 11.7% of placebo-rifaximin-treated patients

did not experience a recurrence of symptoms during

the 10-week treatment-free period

ADVERSE EFFECTS — In clinical trials of rifaximin for

IBS-D, adverse events were generally similar to those

with placebo.6 The most common adverse effects reported in ≥2% of patients treated with the drug were

headache, nausea, and ALT increases Clostridium diffi cile-associated colitis, increased blood creatinine

phosphokinase, and myalgia have occurred rarely Hypersensitivity reactions have been reported Whether long-term use of rifaximin for IBS-D could lead to bacterial resistance remains to be established

PREGNANCY — Teratogenic effects occurred when

pregnant rats and rabbits were given rifaximin at doses higher than those recommended for humans

DRUG INTERACTIONS — Rifaximin is a substrate of

P-glycoprotein (P-gp) Concomitant administration of cyclosporine, a P-gp inhibitor, resulted in an 83-fold increase in the Cmax and a 124-fold increase in the AUC of rifaximin Other P-gp inhibitors may have a similar effect.7 Whether such large increases in serum concentrations of the drug could have adverse effects

is unclear

Table 2 Some Drugs for IBS with Diarrhea

Alosetron 2 – generic 0.5-1 mg bid $1264.20

Lotronex (Prometheus) 1635.00 Loperamide 3 – generic 2 mg as needed 3.90 4

(max 16 mg/d)

Rifaximin – Xifaxan (Salix) 550 mg tid x 14 d 5 1176.80 6

1 Approximate WAC for 30 days’ treatment with the lowest usual dosage WAC = wholesaler acquisition cost, or manufacturer's published price

to wholesalers; WAC represents published catalogue or list prices and may not represent actual transactional prices Source: AnalySource®

Monthly July 5, 2015 Reprinted with permission by First Databank, Inc All rights reserved ©2015 www.fdbhealth.com/policies/drug-pricing-policy

2 Only FDA-approved for use in women with severe IBS-D that has not responded to conventional therapy As part of a Risk Evaluation and Mit-igation Strategy (REMS), the FDA has required that healthcare providers receive special training in the use of alosetron before prescribing the drug

3 Available over the counter

4 Cost for 30 2-mg tablets or capsules.

5 Can be repeated up to 2 times if symptoms recur.

6 Cost for one 14-day treatment course.

Table 1 Pharmacology

Class Rifamycin antimicrobial

Route Oral

Formulation 200, 550 mg tabs

Bioavailability <0.4% absorbed from GI tract

Half-life 6.1 hours in IBS-D patients (after 14 days)

Metabolism Primarily by CYP3A4

Excretion Feces (unchanged, 97% ); urine (unchanged,

<1%); possible biliary excretion

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION — The recommended

dosage of rifaximin for treatment of IBS-D is 550 mg three times daily for 14 days, which can be repeated

up to 2 times if symptoms recur Rifaximin should

be used with caution in patients with severe hepatic impairment

CONCLUSION — The minimally absorbed oral

antibiotic rifaximin (Xifaxan) has been modestly

more effective than placebo in relieving symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D), but relapse is common, its long-term effi cacy and safety for treatment of IBS-D have not been established, and

it is expensive ■

Trang 6

1 Drugs for irritable bowel syndrome Treat Guidel Med Lett 2011;

9:41.

2 AC Ford et al American College of Gastroenterology monograph

on the management of irritable bowel syndrome and chronic

id-iopathic constipation Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109:S2.

3 L Laterza et al Rifaximin for the treatment of

diarrhoea-pre-dominant irritable bowel syndrome Expert Opin Pharmacother

2015; 16:607.

4 N Iorio et al Profi le of rifaximin and its potential in the treatment

of irritable bowel syndrome Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2015; 8:159.

5 M Pimentel et al Rifaximin therapy for patients with irritable

bow-el syndrome without constipation N Engl J Med 2011; 364:22.

6 P Schoenfeld et al Safety and tolerability of rifaximin for

the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome without

constipa-tion: a pooled analysis of randomised, double-blind, placebo-

controlled trials Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014; 39:1161.

7 Inhibitors and inducers of CYP enzymes and P-glycoprotein

Med Lett Drugs Ther 2013; 55:e44.

Polidocanol (Varithena) for

Varicose Veins

An injectable foam formulation of the sclerosing

agent polidocanol (Varithena – Provensis/BTG)

has been approved by the FDA for treatment of

incompetent veins and visible varicosities of the great

saphenous vein system It is the fi rst foam therapy to

be approved for this indication, but polidocanol and

other sclerosants have been used for years as foam

formulations compounded by physicians Polidocanol

is also available in a liquid formulation (Asclera)

to treat smaller veins Sodium tetradecyl sulfate

(Sotradecol) is FDA-approved in a liquid formulation

for use in sclerotherapy

complications than conventional surgery involving vein ligation and stripping.1

A meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials in

˃3000 patients with great saphenous varicose veins found that ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, endovenous laser therapy, and radiofrequency ablation were at least as effective as surgical ligation and stripping.2 Randomized trials comparing foam sclerotherapy, laser ablation, and radiofrequency ablation with each other for treatment of great saphenous varicose veins found that one-year success rates were lowest with foam sclerotherapy.3,4

CLINICAL STUDIES — Approval of polidocanol

injectable foam 1% was based on the results of two trials (VANISH-1 and VANISH-2), only the second

of which has been published, in 511 patients with varicose veins who were randomized to polidocanol 0.5%, 1%, or 2% (VANISH-1), 0.5% or 1% (VANISH-2), or 0.125% (as a subtherapeutic control in both studies),

or to placebo.5 Most patients received one treatment, but patients in VANISH-2 could receive a second treatment 1 week later

Improvement in patient-reported varicose vein symptoms (heaviness, achiness, swelling, throbbing, and itching) from baseline to week 8, the primary endpoint, was signifi cantly greater with polidocanol than with placebo in both studies A clinically meaningful improvement in symptoms was reported by 64.7% and 75.9% of patients treated with polidocanol 1% in the 2 studies compared to 5.4% and 19.6% of those treated with placebo More patients treated with polidocanol 1% also reported improvement in the appearance of visible varicosities (54.9% and 69.0% vs 3.6% and 7.1% with placebo)

ADVERSE EFFECTS — In clinical trials, adverse effects

that occurred in more patients treated with polidocanol foam than with placebo included thrombosis (16%), hematoma (15%), and pain (11%) at the injection site, leg pain (17%), venous thrombosis (8%), superfi cial thrombophlebitis (5%), and deep vein thrombosis (5%) Skin discoloration occurred rarely Severe allergic reactions, including fatal anaphylaxis, can occur Extravasation of the foam could cause necrosis, ischemia, or gangrene Polidocanol should not be used during pregnancy

Use of foam sclerosants has been associated with a risk of intracerebral gas emboli, which can result in neurologic adverse events, including stroke, migraine, and visual disturbances The risk may be lower with

Pronunciation Key Polidocanol: pol" i doe kay' nol Varithena: var i thee' nuh

MECHANISM OF ACTION — Intravenous injection of

polidocanol displaces blood from the vein The foam

attaches to the lipid cell membrane of the venous

endothelium, which leads to endothelial damage,

thrombus formation, and venous occlusion The

occluded vein is eventually replaced by fi brous tissue

Delivering the solution as a foam rather than a liquid

increases the surface area of the sclerosant, allowing

use of lower doses

TREATMENT OF VARICOSE VEINS — Minimally

invasive techniques, such as ultrasound-guided foam

sclerotherapy and endovenous thermal ablation using

laser or radiofrequency energy, are now being used

more frequently A procedure that uses an

ultrasound-guided catheter to deliver an injection of cyanoacrylate

adhesive into the vein to seal it off (VenaSeal) has

recently become available These techniques are

generally associated with faster recovery and fewer

Trang 7

The Medical Letter ® Vol 57 (1474) August 3, 2015

Varithena than with manually compounded foams,

which are typically nitrogen/oxygen gas mixtures

with large bubbles and wide bubble size distribution

No clinically signifi cant neurologic adverse events

occurred during clinical trials with Varithena, which

is a low-nitrogen oxygen/carbon dioxide mixture with

smaller bubbles and a narrow bubble size distribution.6

DOSAGE, ADMINISTRATION, AND COST — Varithena

is supplied in a pouch containing 2 canisters One

contains a 1% polidocanol solution under a carbon

dioxide atmosphere and the other pressurized oxygen;

joining the 2 canisters activates the product, which then

has a shelf-life of 7 days The freshly generated foam

is transferred to a syringe and injected intravenously

within 75 seconds under ultrasound guidance Up

to 5 mL of foam can be given in one injection, with a

maximum of 15 mL per treatment session Additional

treatments may be needed; sessions should be

separated by at least 5 days Compression bandages

are applied after treatment and should be kept in place

for 48 hours; compression stockings should be worn

for 2 weeks The cost for 1 pouch of Varithena that

supplies 45 mL of usable foam is $3195.7

CONCLUSION — Polidocanol injectable foam 1%

(Varithena) improves the symptoms and appearance of

varicose veins How it compares in effi cacy and safety

to physician-compounded foam or to other treatments

for varicose veins remains to be established ■

1 P Gloviczki et al The care of patients with varicose veins and

associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice

guide-lines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American

Ve-nous Forum J Vasc Surg 2011; 53(5 suppl):2S.

2 C Nesbitt et al Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser)

and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous

vein varices Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 7:CD005624.

3 LH Rasmussen et al Randomized clinical trial comparing

en-dovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam

sclero-therapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose

veins Br J Surg 2011; 98:1079.

4 AA Biemans et al Comparing endovenous laser ablation, foam

sclerotherapy, and conventional surgery for great saphenous

varicose veins J Vasc Surg 2013; 58:727.

5 KL Todd 3rd et al The VANISH-2 study: a randomized, blinded,

multicenter study to evaluate the effi cacy and safety of

poli-docanol endovenous microfoam 0.5% and 1.0% compared with

placebo for the treatment of saphenofemoral junction

incom-petence Phlebology 2014; 29:608.

6 D Carugo et al Benefi ts of polidocanol endovenous microfoam

(Varithena) compared with physician-compounded foams

Phlebology 2015 Jun 1 (epub).

7 Approximate WAC WAC = wholesaler acquisition cost or

manufac-turer’s published price to wholesalers; WAC represents a published

catalogue or list price and may not represent an actual

transaction-al price Source: Antransaction-alySource® Monthly July 5, 2015 Reprinted

with permission by First Databank, Inc All rights reserved ©2015

www.fdbhealth.com/policies/drug-pricing-policy.

IN BRIEF

Duopa – A Carbidopa/Levodopa

Enteral Suspension for Parkinson’s Disease

The FDA has approved Duopa (Abbvie), a carbidopa/

levodopa enteral suspension, for treatment of motor fluctuations in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) It has been available in Europe since 2001

In patients with advanced PD, emptying of the stomach may be delayed and unpredictable, which can affect the rate and amount of absorption of carbidopa/levodopa and its effi cacy To bypass the stomach, the new form-ulation is delivered through a nasojejunal (NJ) tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal (PEG-J) tube

A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, 12-week trial in 66 levodopa-responsive patients with advanced

PD and motor complications found that Duopa reduced

daily mean “off” time from baseline signifi cantly more than oral immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa (by 4.04 hours vs 2.14 hours) Mean “on” time without troublesome dyskinesia increased by 4.11 hours with the new formulation and by 2.24 hours with immediate-release tablets.1

Duopa is available in a 100-mL single-use cassette

containing 4.63 mg of carbidopa and 20 mg of levodopa per mL It should be administered over 16 hours through

a NJ or PEG-J tube with the CADD-Legacy 1400

portable infusion pump Patients should be switched

to oral immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa before

starting Duopa; the labeling has instructions for conversion from immediate-release tablets to Duopa

The maximum recommended daily dose of levodopa is

2000 mg (1 cassette/day) Patients must also take oral immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa in the evening after disconnecting the pump The medication cassette should be stored in the refrigerator and removed 20 minutes before administration

One month's supply of Duopa costs $60542; PEG-J tube insertion and administration-related expenses will signifi cantly increase the cost of treatment.3

1 CW Olanow et al Continuous intrajejunal infusion of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease: a randomised, controlled, double-blind,

double-dum-my study Lancet Neurol 2014; 13:141

2 Approximate WAC WAC = wholesaler acquisition cost or man-ufacturer’s published price to wholesalers; WAC represents a published catalogue or list price and may not represent an ac-tual transactional price Source: AnalySource® Monthly July

5, 2015 Reprinted with permission by First Databank, Inc All rights reserved ©2015 www.fdbhealth.com/policies/drug-pricing-policy

3 F Valldeoriola et al Cost analysis of the treatments for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease: SCOPE study J Med Econ 2013; 16:191.

Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook

Trang 8

Questions start on next page

ACCREDITATION INFORMATION:

ACCME: The Medical Letter is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians The Medical

Letter designates this enduring material for a maximum of 2 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™ Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity This CME activity was planned and produced in accordance with the ACCME Essentials and Policies.

AAFP : This enduring material activity, The Medical Letter Continuing Medical Education Program, has been reviewed and is acceptable for up to 52 Prescribed credits by the

American Academy of Family Physicians Term of approval begins January 1, 2015 Term of approval is for one year from this date Each issue is approved for 2 Prescribed credits Credit may be claimed for one year from the date of each issue Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity

ACPE: The Medical Letter is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education This exam is acceptable

for 2.0 hour(s) of knowledge-based continuing education credit (0.2 CEU)

The American Academy of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) and the American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA) accept AMA Category 1 credit for the Physician’s

Recognition Award from organizations accredited by the ACCME.

This activity, being ACCME (AMA) approved, is acceptable for Category 2-B credit by the American Osteopathic Association (AOA)

Physician Assistants: The National Commission on Certifi cation of Physician Assistants (NCCPA) accepts AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ from organizations accredited by

ACCME NCCPA also accepts AAFP Prescribed credits for recertifi cation The Medical Letter is accredited by both ACCME and AAFP.

Physicians in Canada: Members of The College of Family Physicians of Canada are eligible to receive Mainpro-M1 credits (equivalent to AAFP Prescribed credits) as per our

reciprocal agreement with the American Academy of Family Physicians

MISSION:

The mission of The Medical Letter’s Continuing Medical Education Program is to support the professional development of healthcare providers including physicians, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and physician assistants by providing independent, unbiased drug information and prescribing recommendations that are free of industry influence The program content includes current information and unbiased reviews of FDA-approved and off-label uses of drugs, their mechanisms of action, clinical trials, dosage and administration, adverse effects, and drug interactions The Medical Letter delivers educational content in the form of self-study material.

The expected outcome of the CME program is to increase the participant’s ability to know, or apply knowledge into practice after assimilating, information presented in

materials contained in The Medical Letter.

The Medical Letter will strive to continually improve the CME program through periodic assessment of the program and activities The Medical Letter aims to be a leader in supporting the professional development of healthcare providers through Core Competencies by providing continuing medical education that is unbiased and free of industry influence The Medical Letter is supported solely by subscription fees and accepts no advertising, grants, or donations.

GOAL:

Through this program, The Medical Letter expects to provide the healthcare community with unbiased, reliable, and timely educational content that they will use to make independent and informed therapeutic choices in their practice.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES:

Activity participants will read and assimilate unbiased reviews of FDA-approved and off-label uses of drugs and other treatment modalities Activity participants will be

able to select and prescribe, or confi rm the appropriateness of the prescribed usage of, the drugs and other therapeutic modalities discussed in The Medical Letter with

specifi c attention to clinical trials, pathophysiology, dosage and administration, drug metabolism and interactions, and patient management Activity participants will make independent and informed therapeutic choices in their practice.

Upon completion of this program, the participant will be able to:

1 Review the effi cacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto) for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

2 Review the effi cacy and safety of rifaximin (Xifaxan) for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea.

3 Review the effi cacy and safety of polidocanol injectable foam (Varithena) for treatment of varicose veins.

4 Review the effi cacy and safety of carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension (Duopa) for treatment of Parkinson’s disease.

Privacy and Confi dentiality: The Medical Letter guarantees our fi rm commitment to your privacy We do not sell any of your information Secure server software (SSL) is used

for commerce transactions through VeriSign, Inc No credit card information is stored.

IT Requirements: Windows XP/Vista/7/8, Mac OS X+; current versions of Microsoft IE, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Safari, or any other compatible web browser

High-speed connection.

Have any questions? Call us at 800-211-2769 or 914-235-0500 or e-mail us at: custserv@medicalletter.org

Continuing Medical Education Program

medicalletter.org/cme-program Earn Up To 52 Credits Per Year

Choose CME from The Medical Letter in the format that’s right for you!

Comprehensive Exam – Available online or in print to Medical Letter subscribers, this 130 question exam enables you to earn 26 credits immediately

upon successful completion of the test A score of 70% or greater is required to pass the exam Our comprehensive exams allow you to test at your own pace in the comfort of your home or offi ce Comprehensive exams are offered every January and July enabling you to earn up to 52 credits per year $49/exam.

Free Individual Exams– Free to active subscribers of The Medical Letter Answer 10 questions per issue and submit answers online Earn 2 credits/exam

A score of 70% or greater is required to pass the exam.

Paid Individual Exams – Available to non-subscribers Answer 10 questions per issue and submit answers online Earn 2 credits/exam $12/exam

A score of 70% or greater is required to pass the exam.

Trang 9

The Medical Letter ®

Online Continuing Medical Education

DO NOT FAX OR MAIL THIS EXAM

To take CME exams and earn credit, go to:

medicalletter.org/CMEstatus

Issue 1474 Questions

(Correspond to questions #21-30 in Comprehensive Exam #73, available January 2016)

6 Initial treatment of IBS with diarrhea includes:

a dietary modifi cation

b linaclotide

c alosetron

d all of the above

7 In the two double-blind trials (TARGET 1 and 2), signifi cantly more patients treated with rifaximin than with placebo achieved relief from IBS symptoms for at least 2 of the 4 weeks after treatment, the primary endpoint The absolute difference between the 2 groups was:

a 5%

b 9%

c 16%

d 25%

Polidocanol (Varithena) for Varicose Veins

8 For treatment of great saphenous varicose veins, success rates with foam sclerosants appear to be:

a lower than those with laser ablation

b lower than those with radiofrequency ablation

c similar to those with surgical ligation and stripping

d all of the above

9 In the 2 clinical trials supporting approval of Varithena (VANISH 1

and 2), about what percentage of patients reported improvement

in varicose vein symptoms at week 8?

a 15-25%

b 30-40%

c 50-60%

d 65-75%

In Brief: Duopa – A Carbidopa/Levodopa Enteral Suspension for

Parkinson’s Disease

10 In patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease, Duopa reduced

“off” time and increased “on” time compared to oral immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa by about:

a 30 minutes

b 45 minutes

c 1 hour

d 2 hours

Sacubitril/Valsartan (Entresto) for Heart Failure

1 Inhibition of neprilysin:

a decreases vasoconstriction

b decreases sodium retention

c decreases maladaptive remodeling

d all of the above

2 In the PARADIGM-HF trial, the composite endpoint (fi rst

hospital-ization for worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death)

oc-curred in fewer patients treated with Entresto than with enalapril

The absolute difference between the 2 groups was about:

a 5%

b 10%

c 15%

d 20%

3 Entresto can cause:

a hypokalemia

b hypertension

c angioedema

d all of the above

4 A 66-year-old man with asymptomatic (NYHA class I) heart

failure with preserved ejection fraction and cirrhosis asks if he

should take Entresto for his heart failure You could tell him that

he cannot because:

a his heart failure is asymptomatic

b his ejection fraction is not reduced

c Entresto is not recommended for patients with severe liver

impairment

d all of the above

Rifaximin (Xifaxan) for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea

5 A 44-year-old woman with IBS with diarrhea complains of

diarrhea, bloating, and abdominal cramps She asks if she should

take an antidiarrheal such as loperamide You could tell her that:

a she should only take loperamide as needed to reduce stool

urgency and frequency

b she should take loperamide 4 mg every 4 hours to prevent

diarrhea

c loperamide has been shown to improve symptoms of IBS other

than diarrhea

d she should take alosetron instead

ACPE UPN: Per Issue Exam: 0379-0000-15-474-H01-P; Release: August 3, 2015, Expire: August 3, 2016 Comprehensive Exam 73: 0379-0000-16-073-H01-P; Release: January 2016, Expire: January 2017

EDITOR IN CHIEF: Mark Abramowicz, M.D.; EXECUTIVE EDITOR: Gianna Zuccotti, M.D., M.P.H., F.A.C.P., Harvard Medical School; EDITOR: Jean-Marie Pflomm, Pharm.D.; ASSISTANT EDITORS, DRUG INFORMATION: Susan M Daron, Pharm.D., Corinne Z Morrison, Pharm.D., Michael P Viscusi, Pharm.D.; CONSULTING EDITORS: Brinda M Shah, Pharm.D.,

F Peter Swanson, M.D; SENIOR ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Amy Faucard

CONTRIBUTING EDITORS: Carl W Bazil, M.D., Ph.D., Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; Vanessa K Dalton, M.D., M.P.H., University of Michigan Medical

School; Eric J Epstein, M.D., Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Jane P Gagliardi, M.D., M.H.S., F.A.C.P., Duke University School of Medicine; Jules Hirsch, M.D., Rockefeller University; David N Juurlink, BPhm, M.D., Ph.D., Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Richard B Kim, M.D., University of Western Ontario; Hans Meinertz, M.D., University Hospital, Copenhagen; Franco M Muggia, M.D., New York University Medical Center; Sandip K Mukherjee, M.D., F.A.C.C., Yale School of Medicine; Dan M Roden, M.D., Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Esperance A.K Schaefer, M.D., M.P.H., Harvard Medical School; F Estelle R Simons, M.D., University of Manitoba; Neal H Steigbigel, M.D., New York University School of Medicine; Arthur M F Yee, M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.R., Weill Medical College of Cornell University

MANAGING EDITOR: Susie Wong; ASSISTANT MANAGING EDITOR: Liz Donohue; EDITORIAL ASSISTANT: Cheryl Brown

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF SALES: Gene Carbona; FULFILLMENT & SYSTEMS MANAGER: Cristine Romatowski; DIRECTOR OF MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS: Joanne F Valentino; VICE PRESIDENT AND PUBLISHER: Yosef Wissner-Levy

Founded in 1959 by Arthur Kallet and Harold Aaron, M.D.

Copyright and Disclaimer: The Medical Letter, Inc is an independent nonprofi t organization that provides healthcare professionals with unbiased drug prescribing recommendations The editorial

process used for its publications relies on a review of published and unpublished literature, with an emphasis on controlled clinical trials, and on the opinions of its consultants The Medical Letter, Inc is supported solely by subscription fees and accepts no advertising, grants, or donations No part of the material may be reproduced or transmitted by any process in whole or in part without prior permission in writing The editors do not warrant that all the material in this publication is accurate and complete in every respect The editors shall not be held responsible for any damage resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission.

Subscription Services

The Medical Letter, Inc Call: 800-211-2769 or 914-235-0500 To reproduce any portion of this issue, 1 year - $129; 2 years - $232; E-mail: info@medicalletter.org

145 Huguenot St Ste 312 Fax: 914-632-1733 please e-mail your request to: 3 years - $345 $65 per year Call: 800-211-2769 ext 315 New Rochelle, NY 10801-7537 E-mail: custserv@medicalletter.org permissions@medicalletter.org for students, interns, residents, and Special rates available for bulk www.medicalletter.org fellows in the US and Canada subscriptions.

Reprints - $12 each

Ngày đăng: 12/04/2017, 22:32

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm