1920s and 1930s:▪ Adler’s influence: birth order and social connectedness ▪ First non psychoanalytically oriented groups ▪ More group guidance in the schools Emergence of Modern-Day
Trang 1Group Work
Trang 2 Can be viewed from systemic and cybernetics perspective
Dynamic interaction of its members
Hierarchies
Trang 3 Groups have become much more popular
But, why choose a group over individual counseling?
See advantages and disadvantages, Table 7.1, p 227
Trang 4 Prior to 1900:
Functional and pragmatic groups (e.g., daily living skills)
▪ Often moralistic in nature
Jane Addams and Mary Richmond community groups to make systemic change
Turn of century:
Vocational and moral guidance in schools
Dr Henry Pratt: Physician groups with tuberculosis patients
▪ Started with a lecture
▪ Then had patients tell personal stories about their illness
Trang 5 Around 1900: Psychoanalytic principles explained
groups behavior
▪ Primal urges, instincts, parental influences
▪ Herb instincts
▪ Mob instincts
▪ Recapitulation of family issues
1914: Moreno started “psychodrama” and coined the
phrase “group psychotherapy”
Trang 6 1920s and 1930s:
▪ Adler’s influence: birth order and social connectedness
▪ First non psychoanalytically oriented groups
▪ More group guidance in the schools
Emergence of Modern-Day Groups
1947, Kurt Lewin and others: NTL
1940s: Rogers worked with returning GIs from WWII– led to first encounter groups
Trang 7 1960s: Groups reflect freedom and love
Esalen, Michael Murphy, and encounter Groups emerge
Encounter Group Leaders: Rogers, Maslow, Perls, Schutz
Read quote, bottom of p 230
Soon, other groups arise: marathon groups, confrontational
groups, gestalt groups
APA publishes “Guidelines for Psychologists Conducting Growth Groups” (1973)
1960s and 1970s: books on group counseling flourish
1973: ASGW
Trang 8 Groups become alternative to individual counseling
Decline of more “outrageous” groups
Common-theme, task groups, and time-limited (brief groups) become popular
Rise in self-help groups
ASGW:
Best Practice Guidelines
Professional Standards for the Training of Group Workers
CACREP requires group work
Almost all programs now include group work
Trang 9 Five Categories of Groups:
Group dynamics and group process occur in all groups
Group dynamics: internal dynamics
Group process: how group unravels over time
Trang 10 Around for more than 50 years
Particularly popular for last 30 years
Purpose: education, affirmation, and enhancement of
strengths
No paid leader, usually
Sometimes, no leader
Leader is not trained in group process, usually
Leader does help “organize” group
Nominal fee
Focus on specific issues, usually (AA, eating disorders)
See Box 7.1, p 233
Trang 11Focus on conscious behaviors and group dynamics
National Training Laboratory (NTL) first group to do this
Task group specialists usually enter a system and help to
analyze and diagnose problems
Task group leaders help facilitate changes in system
Often focuses on differences among people in a system and how to help people get a long
See Box 7.2, p 234
Trang 12 Formerly: “Guidance Groups”
Focus: Disseminate mental health education to promote
personal group and empowerment
Found in many settings
Designated, well-trained group leader
Focuses on preventive education
Often begins with didactic presentation and then leaders to discussion that may included limited self-disclosure
See Box 7.3, p 235
Trang 13Usually, focused on prevention and wellness, enhancement, increased insight, self-actualization
self- Focus more on conscious than unconscious
Usually, not dealing with severe pathology
Often, focuses on issues related tonormal human
development
Usually, 4-12 members
Well trained leader
See Box 7.3, p 235
Trang 14 Focus on deep-seated, long-term issues
Focus on remediation of severe pathology and personality
reconstruction
Well-trained leader
Usually 4-12 members
Usually, meets for a minimum of 8 sessions
Usually, meet at least once a week for 1-3 hours
Leader facilitates deep expression of feelings and helps
clients work on change
See Box 7.4
Trang 15See Figure 7.1, p 237
Comparison of Psychoeducational, Counseling, and Therapy Groups
Trang 16 Theory in reference to group work allows one to
1. Can show efficacy
2. Have a comprehensive approach
3. Help us understand client
4. Help us decide on techniques
5. Help us predict course of treatment
6. Is researchable—we can see its efficacy
Trang 17Most theories can be applied to group work Use their basic tenets along with a systems framework
Theories that have been successfully applied include:
Trang 18 Securing Appropriate Space
Group Leadership Style
Trang 19Pregroup Stage (Forming a Group)
Trang 20 Initial Stage (Forming)
Members anxious, apprehensive, and want to get started
Focus on others, not self
There and then conversation, not “here and now”
Resistance exhibited
Leader task: define ground rules and build trust
Structure, empathy, and positive regard important
Leaders: genuine and only slightly self-disclosing
Leaders: watch for scapegoating
Trang 21 Transition Stage (Storming than Norming)
Beginning to feel comfortable with technical issues and ground rules– but still some anxiety initially
Members positioning themselves in groups
May project onto leader and have transference to leader
As stage continues, attacking and scapegoating may occur
Leader must deal with attacks and scapegoating
Slowly, trust builds and resistance diminishes
Ownership of feelings occurs
Here and now focus begins
Identification of problems and goals happens
Trang 22 Work Stage (Performing)
Trust occurs, conflict lessens, cohesion occurs
Can give and hear feedback
Work on identified behavioral change
Gain in self-esteem from positive feedback and sense of accomplishment
Use of advanced counseling skills by leader
Systemically: A system has been developed– but make sure the system continues to encourage change and forward movement
Trang 23 Closure (Adjourning)
Increased sense of accomplishment
Saying good-bye
Share what has been learned
Express feelings about one another
Summarize with use of empathy
Consider who might want follow-up in counseling
Evaluation of group?
Trang 24 Principles for Diversity-Competent Group Workers (ASGW)
Social Justice in Group Work:
Can help “privileged” clients see their privilege
Prejudice and the Group as Microcosm of Society
Groups can mimic what happens in society
Cultural Differences between a Group Member and the Group
Trang 25Ethical Issues
Ethical code of ACA and Best Practices Statement of ASGW
Informed Consent and Confidentiality (see p 249)
▪ Can you ensure confidentiality?
Professional Associations: A number exist ASGW is division
Trang 26 Allowing Groups to Unfold Naturally
“Push a group to open up to quickly, and it will push back”
Thus, your ability at facilitating growth in a group is the key mark to allowing the group process to occur