ICD Therapy Presents Patient Identification, Clinical and Economic Challenges • Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia VT/Ventricular Fibrillation VF are at risk of sudden cardiac death
Trang 1Aditya Vaidya
BS Electrical Engineering
M Eng Management IBHRE Certified
Trang 2ICD Therapy Presents Patient Identification,
Clinical and Economic Challenges
• Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia (VT)/Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) are at risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD)
• ICD is the most successful therapy to prevent SCD 1
• Many patients without symptoms die from SCD if not rescued timely
• Some patients often face accessibility to care and economic challenges 2,3
1 http://www.hrsonline.org/PatientInfo/Treatments/ICD/icd_faqs.cfm
2 Lyne J Inappropriate ICD shocks – challenges and advances Arrhythmiawatch Published online September 28, 2011
3 Boriani G, Biffi M, Martignani C, et al Expenditure and value for money: the challenge of implantable cardioverter defibrillators QJM May 2009;102(5):349-356
Trang 4Challenges in Patient
Selection:
Access to Appropriate
Diagnostic Tools
Trang 5Automatic detection added
Longevity and ECG memory increased (to
3 yrs., 49.5 minutes), with episode logs, ICD sensing technology, MRI labeling, and remote monitoring added
AF detection and long-term trended diagnostics (the Cardiac Compass and AF
Summary Reports) added Reveal is developed to help diagnose
unexplained syncope
Trang 6ScreenLink Medtronic ScreenLink is an evidence-based app designed to facilitate screening of patients qualifying for ICD and/or CRT therapies
Trang 8Sprint Quattro ® Family of Defibrillation Leads
Sprint Quattro Secure ® S
Model 6935 Active Fixation, Single Coil
Sprint Quattro
Model 6944 Passive Fixation, Dual Coil
Sprint Quattro Secure
Model 6947 Active Fixation, Dual Coil
The Standard for Exceptional Performance
Backed by the Most Comprehensive Performance Monitoring System in the Industry1
1 Sweeney MO, et al J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001;12:402-410
Trang 9Sprint Quattro Family of Leads
1 Medtronic Product Performance Report,
2011 First Edition, Issue 64
2 St Jude Medical Product Performance
Report, April 2011
3 Boston Scientific Product Performance
Report 2011, Q3 Summary Edition
4 Borleffs CJ, van Erven L, van Bommel
RJ, et al Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol
2009;2:411-416
Trang 10The Standard for Performance 1
survival rate at 9 years when measured by this active
1 Medtronic PPR 2012 2nd edition – 6947 Sprint Quattro Secure lead
1 yr 99.5 2364
%
#
2 yr 99.2 1675
3 yr 98.9 963
4 yr 98.6 733
5 yr 98.1 579
6 yr 97.7 425
7 yr 97.2 280
8 yr 96.7 152
9 yr 96.0 53
90
100
80
10 9
8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1
0
6947 Sprint Quattro Secure
DEVICE SURVIVAL PROBABILITY
Trang 11Medtronic DF4 Connector and Lead System
Designed for Simplicity, Engineered
for Reliability Tested for Safety 1
Lead Pin
• additional visual confirmation
1 Tekmen, Mohac “Worldwide Sales Memo 2012.” Medtronic DF4 system is designed to perform beyond the 1.5x safety factor for electrical isolation defined in ISO 27186 Medtronic data on file January 26, 2012
2 Himes, Adam “Worldwide Sales Memo 2012.” The new DF4 lead has over 58% reduction in lead connector volume Medtronic data on file
January 26, 2012
3 Medtronic Product Performance Report, 2011 First Edition, Issue 64
Device
• Smoother contouring
Trang 13Evolution of Device Shape
Evera® XT DR 34cc
Trang 14Benefits of PhysioCurve ® Shape
Potential benefits of this fully tapered design include 2-7 :
• Enhanced patient comfort
• Improved cosmetic appearance at the
implant site
• Minimal pocket preparation for replacement
procedures
• Designed with lead wrap in mind: landing area to
minimise additional stress on the lead 8
Reduces overall skin pressure by
30% versus non-contoured devices
while maintaining a 35 J output 1
1 Flo, Daniel IS4/DF4 Device Shape Analysis January 2013 Medtronic data on file
2 Gold MR, et al J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:1278-1282
3 Kolker AR, et al Ann Plast Surg 2007;59:26-29
4 Kadish A, et al Circulation 2005;111:3327-3335
5 Sowell LV, et al J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2006;15:830-835
6 Ceelen KK, et al J Biomech 2008;41:3399-3404
7 Shapiro M, et al Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2004;4:213-216
8 Medtronic data on file October 30, 2009
Trang 15Up to 25% Greater Longevity*
1 Medtronic Evera XT and Protecta XT Manuals
*As compared to Protecta XT DR
Evera ® XT’s Longevity increase is
due to 1 :
• Increased battery capacity
and reduced current drain
Trang 17Why Avoiding Shocks is Important
To Reduce Pain and
Anxiety and Increase Device Acceptance 1
To Reduce Healthcare Burden and Improve Patient Quality of Life 1
Avoiding Shocks May Improve Survival/Heart Failure 2
1 Wathen MS,, et al, for the PainFREE Rx II Investigators Circulation 2004;110:2591-2596
2 Sweeney MO, et al Differences in effects of electrical therapy type on health care utilization in the MVP ICD Trial HRS, 2010
Trang 18With SmartShock Technology, 98% of Patients Are Free of Inappropriate Shocks at 1 Year 1
1 Volosin KJ, et al J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2011;22:280-289
Trang 19SmartShock ™ Technology Includes Six Exclusive Algorithms that Discriminate True Lethal Arrhythmias from Other Arrhythmic
and Nonarrhythmic Events 1,2
1 Heintze J, Schloss E, Auricchio A, Zeng C, Sterns L No compromise in VT/VF detection with novel tachyarrhythmia discrimination features in implantable cardioverter defibrillators
2 Wilkoff BL Current topics in ICD Primary Prevention December 28, 2006
3 Volosin KJ, et al J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010;22:280-289
4 Poole JE, et al N Engl J Med 2008;359:1009-1017
See Protecta XT CRT-D, DR, and VR Clinician Manuals for technical details
Protecta ™ XT Predicted Performance 3,4
At nominal settings (SmartShock Technology, ATP During Charging™, NID 18/24)
PR Logic does not apply to the VR devices
Trang 20Anti-Tachycardia Pacing Improves Quality of Life
• A study concluded that shocked Ventricular Arrythmia (VA) episodes are associated with mortality risk Shocked patients have substantially higher
VA episode burden and poorer survival compared with ATP-only-treated patients 1
• A quality of life meta-analysis study found that activation of
anti-tachycardia pacing should be performed in every ICD patient in order to minimize painful shocks and consequent deterioration of quality of life 2
1 Sweeney MO, et al Heart Rhythm 2010;7:353-360
2 Francis J, et al Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2006;1:173-181
Trang 21SmartShock ® 2.0 Evidence
• In Primary Prevention Patients
– PREPARE showed a 63% reduction in shocks for patients
programmed with strategically chosen programming, including a NID of 30/40, as compared to historical trials 1
• In Secondary Prevention Patients
– ADVANCE III showed a 37% reduction of shock and ATP
therapies for patients programmed to 30/40 as compared to
18/24 with no difference in syncopal events 3
1 Wilkoff BL, et al J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:541-550
2 Sweeney MO, et al Circulation 2005;111:2898-2905
3 Gasparini M, et al Late Breaking Trial Session 1-4, HRS 2012
Reducing shocks for both primary and secondary patients is important 1,2
Trang 22OMNI 3,000 patients
PainFREE SST
Trang 23Medtronic Exclusive Technology:
Industry-Leading AT/AF Solutions
Trang 24Challenges in Patient Therapy:
Longevity
Trang 25Studies Confirm that Medtronic Defibrillation Devices Last Longer 1-5
1 Knops P, et al PACE 2009;32:1276-1285
2 Schaer BA, et al Heart Rhythm 2009;6:1737-1743
3 Biffi M, et al Europace 2008;10:1288-1295
4 Kallinen L, et al 2009 http://spo.escardio.org/eslides/view.aspx?eevtid=33&id=1913
US Experience 4 Kaplan-Meier curve for event-free survival of ICDs replaced because of battery depletion for the manufacturers 5
5 Joep Thijssen, MD, et al Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands Available online 15 November 2011;pg 5
Trang 27Challenges in Patient Care:
Device Diagnostic Data
Trang 28OptiVol ® Fluid Status Monitoring
Volume overload is a major
complication for patients with
moderate-to-severe HF and is a frequent cause of
the “revolving door” of hospital
admissions and discharges 1
OptiVol Fluid Status Monitoring provides
unique insight into thoracic fluid buildup
for more informed patient care 2
Combined diagnostics including OptiVol
Fluid Status Monitoring identified
patients at 5.5 times increased risk for
HF hospitalization 3
1 Sackner-Bernstein J What is heart failure and what are the treatment options? Complex questions In: Hayes DL, Wang PJ, Sackner-Bernstein J, Asirvatham SJ, eds
Resynchronization and Defibrillation for Heart Failure: A Practical Approach Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing; 2004:1-2
2 Medtronic Consulta®, Concerto®, and InSync Sentry® CRT-Ds and Secura® and Virtuoso® DR/VR ICDs System Reference Guides
3 Whellan DJ, Ousdigian KT, AL-Khatib SM, et al, for the PARTNERS Study Investigators Combined heart failure device diagnostics identify patients at higher risk of subsequent heart failure hospitalizations: results from PARTNERS HF (Program to Access and Review Trending Information and Evaluate Correlation to Symptoms in Patients With Heart Failure) study J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55(17):1803-1810
Trang 29Cardiac Compass ® Trends
and Heart Failure Management Report
Trang 30Patient information can be entered in the patient
information screen prior to implant, and that data is
automatically populated to TherapyGuide
Explains parameter suggestions based
on results of clinical studies and common best practices
Provides parameter suggestions based on
a patient’s condition and status
Trang 31Ask The ICD
Trang 32Select the right therapy for the patient
Implant reliable leads with good
defibrillation threshold
Reduce inappropriate shocks
Patient Alerts and Device Diagnostic Data
Trang 34Thank You
The Medtronic Mission
Alleviate pain, Restore health, and Extend life