Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Machine Fault Diagnosis and Condition Prognosis using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System and Classification and Regression Trees by Van
Trang 1Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
Machine Fault Diagnosis and Condition
Prognosis using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System and Classification and Regression Trees
by Van Tung Tran Department of Mechanical Engineering
The Graduate School Pukyong National University
February 2009
Trang 2Machine Fault Diagnosis and Condition
Prognosis using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System and Classification and Regression Trees
기계 결함진단 및 예지를 위한 ANFIS 와 CART
Advisor: Prof Bo-Suk Yang
by Van Tung Tran
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Graduate School,
Pukyong National University
February 2009
Trang 4Contents
List of Figures v
List of Tables viii
List of Symbols ix
Abstract
I Introduction 1
1 Background 1
2 Motivation of This Research 6
3 Research Objectives 6
4 Tools and Approaches 7
5 Scientific Contribution of This Research 7
6 Organization of Thesis 8
References 9
II The State-of-The-Art of Machine Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis 11
1.Machine Fault Diagnosis 11
1.1 Model-based approaches 11
1.2 Knowledge-based approaches 13
1.3 Pattern recognition-based approaches 15
2 Machine Fault Prognosis 19
2.1 Statistical approaches 20
2.2 Model-based approaches 21
2.3 Data-driven based approaches 22
References 22
Trang 5III Background Knowledge 36
1 Feature-Based Diagnosis and Prognosis: a Review 36
1.1 Feature extraction techniques 37
1.2 Feature selection techniques 39
2 Feature Representation 40
2.1 Features in time domain 40
2.1.1 Cumulants 40
2.1.2 Upper and lower bound histogram 44
2.1.3 Entropy estimation and error 45
2.1.4 Auto-regression coefficients 45
2.2 Feature in frequency domain 46
2.2.1 Fourier transform 46
2.2.2 Spectral analysis 47
2.2.3 Frequency parameter indices 48
3 Classification and Regression Trees (CART) 49
3.1 Introduction 49
3.2 Tree growing 50
3.2.1 Classification tree 50
3.2.2 Regression tree 52
3.3 Tree pruning 54
3.3.1 Classification tree 54
3.3.2 Regression tree 55
3.4 Cross-validation for selecting the best tree 56
4 Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) 57
4.1 Architecture of ANFIS 57
4.2 Learning algorithm of ANFIS 60
5 Conclusions 61
Trang 6References 61
IV CART and ANFIS Based Fault Diagnosis for Induction Motors 67
1 Introduction 67
2 Induction Motor Faults 67
2.1 Bearing faults 70
2.2 Stator or armature faults 72
2.3 Broken rotor bar and end ring faults 74
2.4 Eccentricity related faults 75
3 The Proposed Fault Diagnosis System for Induction Motors 77
3.1 Experiment and data acquisition 79
3.2 Feature calculation 81
3.3 Feature selection and classification 83
4 Conclusion 90
References 91
V Machine Condition Prognosis 94
1 Introduction 94
2 Prediction Strategies 97
2.1 Recursive prediction strategy 97
2.2 DirRec prediction strategy 98
2.3 Direct prediction strategy 98
3 Time Delay Estimation 99
4 Determining Embedding Dimension 100
4.1 Cao’s method 100
4.2 False nearest neighbor method (FNN) 101
5 Proposed System for Machine Condition Prognosis 103
6 Experiment 105
Trang 77 Case Studies of Machine Condition Prognosis 108
7.1 Case study 1: CART and OS prediction 108
7.2 Case study 2: parallel CART and MS direct prediction 115
7.2.1 Parallel structure of CART 115
7.2.2 Results and discussions 116
7.3 Case study 3: ANFIS and MS direct prediction 124
8 Conclusions 130
References 132
VI Conclusions and Future Works 134
1 Conclusions 134
2 Future Works 135
Acknowledgements
Trang 8List of Figures
Fig 1.1 System costs depending on type of maintenance strategy 3
Fig 1.2 Architecture of a CBM system 4
Fig 3.1 Histogram for bearing signal with different condition 44
Fig 3.2 Classification tree 51
Fig 3.3 Regression tree 53
Fig 3.4 Schematic of ANFIS architecture 58
Fig 4.1 View of a squirrel cage induction motor 68
Fig 4.2 Four types of rolling-element bearing misalignment 70
Fig 4.3 Bearing sizes marked 71
Fig 4.4 Proposed system for fault diagnosis 78
Fig 4.5 Test rig for experiment 79
Fig 4.6 Faults on the induction motors 80
Fig 4.7 Vibration and current signals of each fault condition 81
Fig 4.8 Decision tree of features obtained from vibration signal 84
Fig 4.9 Decision tree of features obtained from current signal 84
Fig 4.10 Topology of ANFIS architecture for vibration signals 85
Fig 4.11 The network RMS error convergence curve 86
Fig 4.12 Bell shaped membership functions for vibration signals 87
Fig 5.1 Hierarchy of prognostic approaches 96
Fig 5.2 Proposed system for machine fault prognosis 104
Fig 5.3 Low methane compressor: wet screw type 105
Fig 5.4 The entire of peak acceleration data of low methane compressor
106
Trang 9Fig 5.5 The entire of envelope acceleration data of low methane compressor
107
Fig 5.6 The faults of main bearings of compressor 108
Fig 5.7 Training and validating results of peak acceleration data (the first 300 points) 109
Fig 5.8 Predicted results of peak acceleration data 110
Fig 5.9 Peak acceleration of low methane compressor 110
Fig 5.10 The values of E1 and E2 of peak acceleration data of low methane compressor 111
Fig 5.11 Training and validating results of peak acceleration data 112
Fig 5.12 Predicted results of peak acceleration data 112
Fig 5.13 Data trending of envelope acceleration of low methane compressor 113
Fig 5.14 The values of E1 and E2 of envelope acceleration data 114
Fig 5.15 Training and validating results of envelope acceleration data
114
Fig 5.16 Predicted results of envelope acceleration data 115
Fig 5.17 Architecture and input values for sub-model of parallel-structure of CART 116
Fig 5.18 Time delay estimation 117
Fig.5.19 The relationship between FNN percentage and embedding
dimension 118
Fig 5.20 Training and validating results of peak acceleration data 120
Fig 5.21 Training and validating results of envelop acceleration data 121
Fig 5.22 Predicted results of peak acceleration data 123
Fig 5.23 Predicted results of envelop acceleration data 124
Fig 5.24 Training and validating results of the ANFIS model for peak acceleration data 126
Trang 10Fig 5.25 Training and validating results of the ANFIS model for envelope
acceleration data 126
Fig 5.26 RMSE convergent curve 127
Fig 5.27 The changes of MFs after learning 128
Fig 5.28 Predicted results of ANFIS model for peak acceleration data
129
Fig 5.29 Predicted results of the ANFIS model for envelope acceleration data 130
Fig 6.1 The general hybrid system 136