1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Marine Environmental Impact Assessment of Abalone, Haliotis discus hannai, Cage Farm in Wando, Republic of Korea

11 392 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 11
Dung lượng 566,14 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

2015 504:657667http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12601-015-0060-y Available online at http://link.springer.com pISSN 1738-5261 eISSN 2005-7172 Article Marine Environmental Impact Assessment of

Trang 1

Ocean Sci J (2015) 50(4):657667

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12601-015-0060-y

Available online at http://link.springer.com

pISSN 1738-5261 eISSN 2005-7172

Article

Marine Environmental Impact Assessment of Abalone, Haliotis discus hannai,

Cage Farm in Wan-do, Republic of Korea

Hyun-Taik Oh1*, Rae-Hong Jung2, Yoon-Sik Cho3, Dong-Woon Hwang2, and Yong-Min Yi1

1 Marine and Fisheries Environmental Impact Assessment Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS), Busan 46083, Korea

2 Marine Environment Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS), Busan 46083, Korea

3 Coastal Wetland Research Institute, National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS), Gunsan 54014, Korea

Received 22 February 2015; Revised 10 August 2015; Accepted 30 August 2015

 KSO, KIOST and Springer 2015

Abstract To assess the marine environmental impacts of abalone,

Haliotis discus hannai, cage farms in Wan-do, we monitored the

benthic environment on top of the sediment underneath cage farm

stations and reference stations We applied two methods for this

assessment One was the A- and B-investigation of the MOM system

(Modeling – On fish farm – Monitoring) developed in Norway

The other was a general environmental monitoring method which

is widely used In this study, we found benthic animals in all samples

that belonged to condition 1 which were based on group 1(presence

of macrofauna) of the B-investigation method The values of redox

potential (group 2 – pH, redox potential) in all samples were above

+65 mV belonging to condition 1 Based on sensory results (group

3 – gas, color, odor, thickness of deposits), five out of seven experiment

samples showed condition 1 while stations 2 and 7 showed condition

2, which have been cultured for 10 years in semi-closed waters As

group 2 takes precedence over group 3, the level of the conditions

for B-investigation results consequently showed condition 1 in all

stations We found that pollutants and trace metals in the sediment

underneath cage farms were lower than the pollution standard This

led us to conclude that the environmental impacts of the cage farms

in this study were not significant

Key words environmental impact assessment, abalone cage

farm, MOM, benthic environment

1 Introduction

Concerns about the marine environmental impact of fish

farms have grown as marine pollution caused by fish farming

has increased Marine cage farming affects the marine

environment in a variety of ways In general, the impact of

fish cage farms is more serious than that of shellfish cage farms like abalone cultures and long-line cultures like oysters and clams This is due to overfeeding, nutrient loading of individual organisms, and waste from fish farm facilities (Silvert 1992; Naylor et al 2000; Sarà et al 2004) The enrichment of organic materials both from fish and abalone cage farms may cause the reduction of demanded oxygen (DO) in lower levels of water, not only generating a high concentration of acid-volatile sulfide (AVS) in sediment, but changing benthic communities around the farms (Yokoyama 2002, 2003; Kalantzi and Karakassis 2006) The environmental impact assessment (EIA)

of cage farms has been studied and monitored in Africa, Asia-Pacific, Europe, and America with different specialized methods for each case (FAO 2009) The highest application

of EIA to cage farms has been found in the finfish aquaculture industries of salmon, seabream, sea bass, and tuna around Europe and also in shellfish and seaweed farming in Europe, Norway, Australia, and China (Hansen et al 2001; Crawford et

al 2003; Borja et al 2009; Zhang et al 2009)

A report from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations documented that the Norwegian Modeling – On fish farming – Monitoring (MOM) is reliable, fit for the purpose, and is cost-effective to assess the marine environmental impact of cage culture (FAO 2009) Even though the MOM system was developed primarily as an environmental impact assessment tool for fish cage farming, it is based on the general parameters for proper marine environmental management of cage farms, including finfish, shellfish, and seaweed culture (Zhang et al 2009) The MOM has A-B-C investigation methods according to temporal and spatial features

*Corresponding author E-mail: ohtek@korea.kr

Trang 2

The A-investigation is a monthly or seasonal measurement

of the sedimentation rate of the organic material underneath

a cage farm It provides fish-farmers with immediate information

regarding the load as a part of their internal control routines,

which do not have any environmental quality standards

(Hansen et al 2001) The B-investigation is performed annually

or biannually in the local impact zone, and combines benthic

communities from Group 1, the pH-redox potential from

Group 2, and sensory parameters from Group 3 The

C-investigation is performed from the intermediate impact zone

to the regional impact zone, and is the study of a benthic

community structure (Ervik et al 1997; Maroni 2000) The

frequency of monitoring depends on the degree of environmental

impact For A-investigation and B-investigation, the frequencies

of monitoring are every month, every 2nd month, every 3rd

month and twice a year, every year, every 2nd year, respectively

Abalone, Haliotis discus hannal, production in South

Korea soared to 1,065 tons in 2003 from 85 tons at the

beginning of 2000 thanks to the development of net cage

technology which is a coastal water-based culture (Park and

Kim 2013) The cost of abalone farming is generally much

cheaper than that of land-based culture In 2011, Korea

produced 6,800 tons of abalone and it was the second largest

amount in the world Jeollanam-do is the leading producer

of abalone, accounting for 99% of the total production in S

Korea Located within Jeollanam-do, Wan-do produces

about 94% of this total and this is why the island is called the

Mecca of the abalone industry in Korea The gravest threat

to the abalone industry in Wan-do is the increasing mortality

rate The reasons for the increasing mortality rate are very

complicated and diverse Causes include: deteriorated currents

due to the densely distributed farms, depleted-oxygen due to

long-chained farms and seaweed Vulnerability caused by

storms and typhoons during the summer also contributes to

this problem Nonetheless, most of the studies that have

been conducted have focused on the environmental impact

of fish farming and research on shell farming has seldom

been carried out

In this context, this study is aimed at evaluating the impacts

of bio-deposits excreted by abalone and fall-offs of seaweed

in the benthic environment using the Norwegian MOM system

at a variety of licensed abalone farms in Wan-do Through

this experiment, we aim to determine two things Firstly, we

will determine the immediate quantification of the benthic

environment on site using the B-investigation methods

Secondly, we will collect detailed environmental information

including the condition of benthic communities and the concentration of pollutants and trace metals underneath abalone farms through laboratory analysis

2 Data and Methods

Study sites

The study sites are located in Wan-do, Jeollanam-do, in the southern seas of the Korean peninsula The sampling stations for the benthic environmental assessment are underneath the abalone cage farms near Saengil-do and Geumil-do (Fig 1) The average depth of the study sites are approximately 18

m, and the depth of each station and license information are shown in Table 1 The field trip for sediment sampling and investigation on site took place between November 1 and November 3, 2013 The tidal range in Wan-do is about 2 m and the sea water is exchanged by the tide through open channels The average velocities of the currents are between 89.2 cm·s-1 and 93.9 cm·s-1 (Yang 2011) Around these islands, sea-farmers have developed abalone culture facilities next

to seaweed farms since 2003 with the supplementation of abalone seedling production in the waters (Park and Kim 2013) As the abalone eat the abundant forms of seaweed

such as kelp, Saccharina japonica, and undaria, Undaria pinnatitida, Wan-do has become an optimal location for

abalone farms since the early 2000s

Sampling and analysis

For this study, 9 stations for benthic samples and investigation were selected on the basis of the period of time they had been involved in abalone aquaculture Taking vessel tracks into account, we chose 3 stations in possession of licenses for abalone aquaculture for almost 9–10 years (1, 2, 7) and 4 stations that were in possession of the same licenses for 4–6 years (3, 4, 5, 6) (Table 1) We chose two reference stations which were neither utilized for abalone culture nor seaweed culture in the inner waters (8) and on the way to a channel (9) Samples for the benthic environmental assessment were

in accordance with MOM B-investigation data and were collected at abalone farms (1 to 7) and reference stations (8

to 9) by a van Veen grab (0.05 m2) Using the first collection

of the samples, we monitored the pH-redox potential and sensory parameters on site, and then moved those samples to

a sieve and added two more collections for the macrofauna abundance experiment (0.15 m2) Finally, benthic samples were sieved with a 1-mm mesh sieve, checked for remaining

Trang 3

macrofauna left on the sieve, and then preserved for laboratory

analysis and macrofauna classification In addition, the

unsieved sediment samples were preserved on site and

transferred to the laboratory to analyze the total organic

carbon (TOC, mg·g-1), total nitrogen (TN, mg·g-1), ignition

loss (IL, %), and trace metals such as Arsenic (As, mg·kg-1),

Cadmium (Cd, mg·kg-1), Chromium (Cr, mg·kg-1), Copper

(Cu, mg·kg-1), Lead (Pb, mg·kg-1), Zink (Zn, mg·kg-1) and

IL, and TOC based on the standard experimental method for

the marine environment For the analysis of trace metals,

dried samples were digested in a mixture of HNO3, HF and

mass spectrometer (ICP-MS, Perkin Elmer Elan-6000) at the National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS) The recovery rates for the target heavy metals in the standard reference materials were reasonably good (82–100%)

MOM modeling

In each station, we followed the scoring system of the MOM B-investigation and this generally means that the lower the score is, the better the benthic environment is, following the Norwegian Standards Association (Ervik et al 1997; Hansen et al 2001) For macrofauna, we assigned a score of

0 if materials remaining on the mesh screen contained macrofauna, or 1 otherwise For the investigation of the benthic

Fig 1 (a) The research site in Wan-do and sampling stations for experiment (#1–#7) and reference (#8–#9), (b) The sampling station of

abalone cage farms and the research vessel, (c) abalone net cage culture

Table 1 The information of sampling stations including license number, first date of license, name of species for culture, renew date, area of

farms, and water depth (* indicates 910 years old abalone cage farms)

No License No License Date Species Renew Date Area(Ha) Depth(m)

#1 11711 2003-06-24 * Net cage (Abalone) 2013-06-23 3 20

#2 12076 2004-09-23 * Net cage (Abalone) 2015-09-22 5 15

#7 11792 2004-08-10 * Net cage (Abalone) 2014-08-09 4 20

Trang 4

communities underneath the abalone farms, a qualified

taxonomist investigated the macrofauna species Based on

the observation results of the pH and redox potential at 2 cm

depth in all sites, we assigned the score of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 5 in

accordance with the Norwegian standards(Schaanning and

Hansen 2005) Sensory parameters such as outgassing, color,

smell, consistency, grab volume and the thickness of deposits

were scored 0, 1, 2 or 4 depending on the extent to which a

parameter is affected by organic enrichment The more the

sediment is affected by organic materials, the higher the

score assigned to the sensory parameters (Table 2) The

analysis of the aforementioned parameters is shown in Table

2 below

3 Results

Group 1 (benthic community)

The group 1 parameter is a determinant of whether sediment

samples contain macrofauna or not Macrofauna were found

in all of the samples from all stations after sieving through a 1-mm mesh sieve, so all sites were given the score of 0 which means that circumstances at all stations were acceptable or satisfactory The mean score of all the samples at the study sites was 0, indicating that the group 1 condition was normal

at the study sites The most abundant species at each sample station were polychaetes A total of 41 polychaetes were identified

with Paralacydonia paradoxa, Sternaspis scutata, Amaeana occidentalis, Cirrophorus branchiatus and Flabelligeridae unid making up the majority, and their appearance frequencies

were 67%, 78%, 44%, 44% and 56%, respectively (Table 3) The number of the species in each station ranged from 4–18 per 0.15 m2 The highest quantities were found at the inner sites near the islands (#5, #7, #8) The lowest quantity was found at the reference station #9 in the open channel where

we could take only small sediment samples due to strong currents and hard consistency with no cage farms around Even if a taxonomist could classify the lowest number polychaete species at sampling station 9, its evaluated

Table 2 Environmental monitoring methodology of both Norwegian MOM investigation A-B and general environmental monitoring in

Korea

A-Investigation Sedimentation rate mm/year Value

B-Investigation

Group 1 (Presence of macrofauna) ind./0.15m2 Presence = 0 Absence = 1 mean score  0.5: condition 1, 2 or 3

mean score > 0.5: condition 4

Group 2

0, 1, 2, 3, 5 (Schaanning and Hansen, 2005)

mean score  1: condition 1

1 < mean score  2: condition 2

2 < mean score  3: condition 3

mean score > 3: condition 4

Group 3 (Sensory parameters)

Outgassing Quantitative assessment of

gas bubbles

Absence = 0 Presence = 4

mean score < 4: condition 1

4  mean score < 10: condition 2

10  mean score  14: condition 3

mean score > 14: condition 4

Color Subjectivevisual

assessment

Pale/Gray = 0 Brown/Black = 2

Smell Subjectiveolfactory

assessment

None = 0 Medium = 2 Strong = 4 Consistency Subjectivetactile

assessment

Firm = 0 Soft = 2 Loose = 4 Grab volume Quantitativeassessment of

grab volume

< 1/4 = 0 1/4 ~3/4 = 1

> 3/4 = 2 Thickness of

deposits

Quantitative assessment of seposits

< 2 cm = 0

2 ~ 8 cm = 1

> 8 cm = 2 General

investigation

Sedimentary parameters (TOC, TN, IL) Concentration TOC, TN : mg

-1

IL : % Trace metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Zn, Hg)Concentration mg kg-1

Trang 5

sediment condition was still based on group 2 and 3,

showing that nutrient concentration and trace metals were

still good (Table 4, Table 5)

The Shannon-Wiener index ranged between 1.91–3.92

Table 3 The macrofauna abundance (ind./0.15 m2) at experiment sites (#1#7) and reference sites (#8#9)

Level of condition (1~3) (1~3) (1~3) (1~3) (1~3) (1~3) (1~3) (1~3) (1~3)

Paraonis glacilis japonica 15

Diversity index 2.61 2.91 2.65 2.93 3.53 2.04 3.92 3.38 1.91

Trang 6

which indicated that the conditions of all stations in our study

were better than those of shellfish and seaweed farming areas in a

similar study (1.8–2.3) carried out in China (Zhang et al

2009) Group 1 and polychaete community results revealed

that there were not any significant differences between sampling

stations in terms of the number of species, as the results of

ANOVA showed that the significance probability was above

0.05 Overall, the sediments underneath abalone cage farms

in the study sites were still in an acceptable or satisfactory

condition

Group 2 (chemical values)

Group 2 parameters for the Norwegian B-investigation

are based on the measurement of pH and redox potential

ascertained by inserting electrodes into the sediment (Hansen et

al 1997) The pH and redox potential in the sediment was measured immediately after the samples were collected from a depth of 20 mm at all stations The pH and redox potential (Eh) values ranged between 7.71–8.09 and 65.0–135.1 mV, respectively The assigned scores based on the pH and redox potential values are 0 (#4, #6, #7, #8, #9) and 1 (#1, #2, #3, #5), so the level of the conditions at all sites is 1 (Table 4) Scores for the pH and redox potential were analyzed 0 or 1 according to

a previous study by Schannig and Hansen (2005), and the scores were applicable to all sampling stations for condition

1 This was based on group 2 of the B-investigation method Even though the values of reference stations (#8, #9) were higher than those of the experimental stations (#1–#7), the

Table 4 The pH and redox potential values, concentration of nutrients, and trace metals in the sediment

B-Investigation

(Group 2)

redox potential mV 99.5 79.9 85.2 115.5 65.5 110.5 105.5 135.5 130.5

Sedimentary

parameters

IL % 5.47 5.58 4.46 5.78 3.58 5.16 5.21 5.61 5.45

TN mg·g-1

1.45 1.41 0.71 1.35 0.45 1.15 0.95 1.25 1.15 TOC mg·g-1 10.31 9.95 5.51 9.85 3.35 8.31 6.95 9.35 7.85

Sediment grain

Silt % 50.1 48.2 36.6 33.2 43.6 53.6 56.1 40.7 53.1 Clay % 48.8 51.0 58.2 65.3 29.1 43.3 41.2 53.8 45.0

Harmful

substances

As mg·kg-1 6.78 6.66 6.01 6.93 5.34 5.99 6.14 5.29 6.12

Cd mg·kg-1

0.03 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.03

Cr mg·kg-1 50.19 52.39 49.81 53.38 40.13 48.14 57.95 51.37 54.02

Cu mg·kg-1

16.95 18.14 14.72 18.39 11.81 16.31 17.72 17.13 17.41

Pb mg·kg-1 25.73 26.72 22.37 27.41 19.78 22.45 26.96 23.43 24.07

Zn mg·kg-1

86.17 90.42 80 92.41 64.19 96.6 89.86 85.13 85.3

Hg mg·kg-1 0.02 0.015 0.008 0.014 0.008 0.013 0.013 0.014 0.014

Table 5 Sensory results both for abalone cage farm stations (#1–#7) and reference stations (#8–#9)

Trang 7

differences were trivial and all values were mostly

concentrated in the border of 0 and 1 According to the group

2 result, the environmental conditions in all stations meet the

standards for a well-oxygenated marine environment with

low organic input and favorable conditions for the presence

of benthic communities Our measurements were not made

at different levels of depth but only at a depth of 20 mm to

examine the systematic pH and redox potential differences

between farming grounds and reference stations

The sand, silt, and clay amounts or ratios were collected

underneath the cage farms using a ternary figure based on

the Shepard classification scheme (Shepard 1954) The average

composition of gravel, sand, silt and clay were recorded as

0%, 5.5%, 46.1% and 48.4% respectively (Table 4) The

sediments mostly consisted of silty clay and clayish silt

except at station 5 which was primarily made up of sand at

27.3% The grain size ranged between 6.2–9.2 Ф which

means that it consisted of very fine silt which was mostly

clay The sorting values and skewness values ranged between

3.0–3.4 Ф and -0.3–0.9, which means very poorly sorted and

very coarse skewed, respectively The sorting kurtosis showed

very leptokurtic curves with the value of 1.6–2.4 Our study

sites have cultured abalone since 2004, but the sedimentary

composition has not yet been affected by abalone cage

farms

The concentration of sedimentary parameters such as IL

(%), TN (mg·g-1), and TOC (mg·g-1) ranged between 3.58–

5.78%, 0.45–1.45 mg·g-1, 3.35–10.30 mg·g-1 respectively

The values of IL were mostly within the range of 5.1–5.8%,

but station 5 had the lowest value of 3.58% due to its higher

composition of sand at 27.3% At station 9, both the TN and

TOC concentrations were lower than those at other stations,

too

Results indicated that the finer the sediment, the higher the

concentration of pollutants This is similar to the results of

other related studies conducted at the surface sediment of

cage farms (Matthaei et al 2006) In Japan, if the concentration

of TOC is above 10.3 mg·g-1 in a fish farm, the responsible

local authority would issue a warning to farmers to take action

to preserve the marine environment according to environmental

quality status (EQS) (Yokoyama 2003) In Europe, if the

concentration of TOC is lower than 11.9 mg·g-1, farmers get

a “Good” or “High” rating based on the European EQS (Bakke

et al 2010) If the TOC standard of Europe was applied to

abalone cage farms in this study, the values of TOC in all

stations would have been lower than the standard, which indicates

that sediment conditions are quite good The concentrations

of TOC in most of stations were lower than the standards applied in Japan except for station 1 (10.31 mg·g-1) where the cage culture has been established since 2003 These parameters

at the cage farms did not reveal any significantly lower values than those at the reference stations (Table 4) We found that sedimentary environmental conditions in 8 out of 9 stations were still good based on the standards of Japan, and all stations were still environmentally healthy according to European standards

The trace metals in the sediment are measured to check the safety of the abalone cage farming grounds In this study, the content of trace metals such as As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Zn and Hg were measured underneath cage grounds and reference stations According to the United States National Ocean and Atmosphere Administration (NOAA)’s reference tables for trace metals in sediment, the critical values of effect range low (ERL) for As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Zn and Hg are 8.2 mg·kg-1, 1.2 mg·kg-1, 81.0 mg·kg-1, 34.0 mg·kg-1, 46.7 mg·kg-1, 150.0 mg·kg-1 and 0.15 mg·kg-1 respectively (Buchman 2008) The values for harmful substances at all stations were lower than those of the sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) This suggests that the impacts of trace metals on benthic communities were negligible The study sites in Wan-do were also found not to be significantly polluted by harmful substances, and healthy sediment conditions had been maintained The As value of station 4 was below the standard but close to the threshold (85%), so more studies are required to identify the potential causes of metal pollution in abalone cage farms (Table 4)

Group 3 (sensory values)

Group 3 parameters of the B-investigation show many sensory variables representing organic enrichment such as gas ebullition, color, odor, consistency and thickness of sludge The results of sensory parameters are shown in Table 5 Outgassing was not found in any of the sample stations, so

we assigned an on- site score of 0 to them The colors of sample sites were gray (score = 0) except at station 7 which was brown-black (score 2) There was no smell from the sediment samples, but there was a slight sulfide smell from station 7 The consistency of the sediment was soft and gentle (score = 2), but station 9 was hard (score = 0) Mostly, the grab volume was not greater than 3/4 except at station 2 which got a full volume grab The thickness of sludge accumulated

on top of the original sediment ranged between 0.6–1.5 cm,

Trang 8

so we a score of 0 was assigned for all stations The total

scores of group 3 in the B-investigation ranged from 1–7,

with station 7 with the highest score and station 9 with the

lowest score A sum less than 4 falls into condition 1 while

the sum equal to or greater than 4 and less than 9 falls into

condition 2 Therefore, the level of condition based on the

sum of scores was condition 1 for (#1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8)

and condition 2 for (#2, #7) (Table 5)

As a whole, general conditions were given by the results

of the group 1, 2, 3 of the B-investigation Most sample

stations (#1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #9) showed the same level of

conditions with both group 2 and 3 containing macrofauna

Therefore, we determined that the general condition of

stations 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9 were 1 However, samples from

station 2 and 7 were different from group 2 and 3 If they are

different, group 2 takes precedence over group 3 (Ervik et al

1997; Hanse et al 2001) Therefore we determined that the

general conditions of station 2 and 7 were 1 because the

condition of the station is determined by group 2 (Table 6)

We found that sedimentary environmental conditions in all

sites were still good judging by the concentration of IL, TN and TOC, even though the value of TOC in station 1 was similar

to the value of standard applied in Japan for marine environmental fish farm preservation In Wan-do, the concentrations of trace metals were below the limit of ERL, which indicates that the environment is still clean (Table 4)

4 Discussion

The increasing age of a farm is likely related to worsening conditions

Abalone cage farms in Wan-do, Jeollanam-do have been intensely developed since the early 2000s with the development

of net cage technology in coastal waters With the increasing abalone mortality rate, farmers have become seriously concerns about the environmental impacts of the abalone cage farms and the densely distributed facilities in a limited site area

Table 6 General level of condition of the sediment in Wan-do

Sedimentary condition Normal Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Trace metals (ERL) None None None None None None None None None

Fig 2 The results of pH and redox potential based on previous

measurements from various cage farms in Europe (Schanning

and Hansen 2005)

Fig 3 Ternary diagram for sedimentary composition around cage

farm in Wan-do

Trang 9

Meanwhile, a marine environmental monitoring program

by the NIFS has been undertaken in the coastal waters of S

Korea Even though there are a number of observation

stations, they are not close to the abalone farms in Wan-do

The nearest station of the NIFS is located 3.2 km to the north

and 4.7 km to the west of the abalone cage farms in this

study To assess the marine environmental impacts of cage

farms, regular monitoring is needed directly underneath

cage farms because the impacts of sedimentary parameters

should be measured within 30 to 50 m of cage centered

grounds In this study, we concluded that the general conditions

underneath abalone cage farms were pretty good, though the

values of some stations were a little higher than those of the

reference stations In particular, the 10 year-old licensed

cage farms (stations 2 and 7) showed the level of condition

2 according to the sensory parameters of the B-investigation

method Also, the value of TOC at station 1, a 10 year-old

licensed cage farm, was higher than the standard applied at

fish farms in Japan (Yokoyama 2003) More extensive and

regular interdisciplinary studies in close proximity to abalone

cage farms are required to investigate the potential pollution

of bio-deposits excreted by abalone, fall-off from seaweed,

and harmful substances in the sediment Without the environmental

impact assessment of abalone cage farms, a local authority

cannot take prompt action to determine the causes of unexpected

deaths among abalone cultures which may be related to

oxygen-depletion and environmental changes

K-MOM necessity

The MOM system was developed for the assessment of

the marine environmental impacts of intensive marine fish

farming in Norwegian waters (Ervik et al 1997) It covers the

environmental impacts not only in local and intermediate

zones through the A and B investigation methods but also in

intermediate and regional zones by C-investigation methods

And it allows for an immediate assessment to be carried out

on site and can be conducted easily and the results sent to the

laboratory for analysis by professionally skilled technicians

and taxonomists This convenient method allows local

fishermen to receive the training to carry out the measurements

The general concept of the MOM system is based on a general

assessment of the marine environment regardless of the

species being reared or cultivated Both fish cage farming

and abalone cage farming have similar impacts on the benthic

environment, even though fish cage farming affects the

marine environment in a slightly more detrimental manner

than abalone cage farming To date, most of the researches conducted have been focusing on fish farming However, environmental problems have started to occur in the abalone cage farming industry and this has led to a decrease in productivity We have ascertained that the environmental impact around abalone cage farms in Wan-do can also be assessed using this system We assigned a score range to a schematic assessment map based on our observation results

To use this pH-redox potential method frequently, we need

to collect more measurements from several more culture grounds Measurements need to be made at different levels

of depth in core samples, and then the lowest pH and the corresponding redox potential should be used to assign scores The group 3 parameters provide reliable information

on sediment conditions Visual observation is also a good way to obtain valuable information on the marine environment, but it has been underestimated as an adequate tool to obtain measurement results with respect to sedimentary parameters and trace metals More extensive studies on sensory parameters are required to improve them as a reliable method This can

be accomplished through a questionnaire survey by experts based on a dataset Eventually, we need to put in place Korea – MOM (K-MOM) to properly evaluate the licensed culture farms

Better understanding of hydrodynamics

The marine environmental impacts of cage farms are closely related to farming locations (Karakassis et al 2000) The stronger the current is, the less polluted the environment

is with fewer deposits of pollutants and pseudofaeces by abalone and the absence of excessive input of seaweed deposits underneath farms Densely distributed facilities of abalone cage farms and long-chained farms cause the slowing

of water flow and water exchange, especially in semi-closed waters Although we have data on average current speeds and tidal range from Wan-do, these are not reliable as they were not measured close to the cage farms In the study sites, the speed and patterns of currents as well as the amount of sea water exchanges could be one of the main reasons for variations in biological and chemical parameters, but those physical characteristics were beyond the scope of this study

On a national and regional level, the concerned authorities should consider those physical characteristics when they prepare the relocation of and new licenses for abalone cage farms in the near future Our knowledge of hydrodynamic conditions can help us better understand the parameters that

Trang 10

are represented and where alternative farming sites should

be located

5 Conclusion

In this study, we evaluated the marine environmental impacts

of abalone cage farms using the MOM system and compared

sedimentary parameters and trace metals in Wan-do, S

Korea We found the general level of the condition which

was given by the results of group 1, 2, 3 of B-investigation

methods was 1 in all abalone cage and references stations

We found macrofauna in all stations The most abundant

species was polychaete with Sternaspis scutata, Paralacydonia

paradoxa, Cirrophorus branchiatus, Flabelligeridae unid

and Amaeana occidentalis as the major variety The pH and

65.0–135.1 mV, respectively The assigned scores based on

the pH and redox potential are 0 (#4, #6, #7, #8, #9) and 1

(#1, #2, #3, #5), so the level of conditions in all sites is 1 The

total scores of group 3 in the B-investigation ranged between

1–7, and the level of the conditions based on the sum of the

scores was condition 1 (#1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8) and

condition 2 (#2, #7) If group 2 and group 3 bring a different

result, group 2 takes precedence over group 3 Therefore, we

determined the level of the general condition as condition 1

We found that sedimentary environmental conditions are

still good in all sites judging by the concentration of IL, TN,

and TOC The concentration of the trace metals was below

the limit of ERL which indicates that the areas are in a good

environmental condition

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by a grant from the National Institute

of Fisheries Science (RP-2015-ME-036)

References

Bakke T, Källqvist T, Ruus A, Breedveld GD, Hylland K (2010)

Development of sediment quality criteria in Norway J Soils

Sediments 10(2):172–178

Borja Á, Rodríguez JG, Black K, Bodoy A, Emblow C, Fernandes

TF, Forte J, Karakassis I, Muxika I, Nickell TD, Papageorgiou

N, Pranovi F, Sevastou K, Tomassetti P, Angel D (2009) Assessing

the suitability of a range of benthic indices in the evaluation of

environmental impact of fin and shellfish aquaculture located

in sites across Europe Aquaculture 293(3–4):231–240

Buchman MF (2008) NOAA screening quick reference tables National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, NOAA OR&R Report 08-1, 34 p

Crawford CM., Macleod CKA, Mitchell IM (2003) Effects of shellfish farming on the benthic environment Aquaculture

224(1):117–140

Ervik A, Hansen PK, Aure J, Stigebrandt A, Johannessen P, Jahnsen T (1997) Regulating the local environmental impact of intensive marine fish farming I The concept of the MOM system (Modelling-Ongrowing fish farms-Monitoring) Aquaculture

158(1):85–94

FAO (2009) Environmental impact assessment and monitoring in aquaculture FAO, Rome, FAO fisheries and aquaculture technical paper 527, 57 p

Hansen PK, Ervik A, Aure K, Johannessen J, Jahnsen P, Stigebrandt T, Schaanning A (1997) MOM Concept and revised edition of monitoring program 1997 Institute of Marine Research, Bergen,

51 p Hansen PK, Ervik A, Schaanning M, Johannessen P, Aure J, Jahnsen T, Stigebrandt A (2001) Regulating the local environmental impact

of intensive, marine fish farming: II The monitoring programme

of the MOM system (Modelling–Ongrowing Fish farms–

Monitoring) Aquaculture 194(1):75–92

Kalantzi I, Karakassis I (2006) Benthic impacts of fish farming: meta-analysis of community and geochemical data Mar Pollut

Bull 52(5):484–493

Karakassis I, Tsapakis M, Hatziyanni E, Papadopoulou KN, Plaiti

W (2000) Impact of cage farming of fish on the seabed in three

mediterranean coastal areas ICES J Mar Sci 57(5):1462–1471

Maroni K (2000) Monitoring and regulation of marine aquaculture in

Norway J Appl Ichthyol 16(4–5):192–195

Matthaei CD, Weller F, Kelly DW, Townsend CR (2006) Impacts

of fine sediment addition to tussock, pasture, dairy and deer

farming streams in New Zealand Freshwater Biol 51(11):2154–

2172 Naylor RL, Goldburg RJ, Primavera JH, Kautsky N, Beveridge MCM, Clay J, Folke C, Lubchenco J, Mooney H, Troell M (2000)

Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies Nature 405:1017–

1024 Park CJ, Kim SY (2013) Abalone aquaculture in Korea J Shellfish

Res 32(1):17–19

Sarà G, Scilipoti D, Mazzola, Modica A (2004) Effects of fish farming waste to sedimentary and particulate organic matter

in a southern Mediterranean area (Gulf of Castellammare, Sicily):

a multiple stable isotope study Aquaculture 234(1):199–213

Schaanning MT, Hansen PK (2005) The suitability of electrode measurements for assessment of benthic organic impact and their use in a management system for marine fish farms In: Hargrave B (ed) Environmental effects of marine finfish aquaculture Springer, Berlin, pp 381–408

Shepard FP (1954) Nomenclature based on sand-silt-clay ratios J

Sediment Res 24(3):151–158

Ngày đăng: 17/05/2016, 10:41

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm