Impacts of the Safe Routes to School Program on Walking and BicyclingNoreen McDonald University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1... Safe Routes to School Program Impacts8... School Bus
Trang 1Impacts of the Safe Routes to School Program on Walking and Bicycling
Noreen McDonald University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
1
Trang 3Children’s Travel
3
Trang 7Why do we need to understand
Physical Activity Opportunities
Trang 8Safe Routes to School Program Impacts
8
Trang 9School Bus
Transit
US Mode to School, 5-18 year olds
Source: McDonald, et al 2011 AJPM 41(2): 146-151.
Trang 11SRTS by the Numbers
11
Funding
$1.2 Billion
Schools
Source: McDonald, et al 2013 AJPM 45(4): 401-406.
1 in 5
Trang 12Research Question
• Do SRTS programs affect the proportion of
children walking and bicycling to school?
12
Trang 13Quasi-• 4 states
• 801 schools
• 2007-2012
Trang 14Proportion Walking
and Bicycling to School
SRTS Interventions
School Characteristics
Neighborhood Characteristics
Time Period
14
it f SRTS X Z D
Trang 16Source: National Center for Safe Routes to School
Trang 17• 4Es
• Engineering
• Education, Encouragement
• Enforcement
Trang 18Linear Function
% Walk Bike
SRTS
Combined
Time
Presence (1/0)
Number of
Presence Number of
Years
Trang 19School and Neighborhood
• US Dept of Education
• Census
• WalkScore
Trang 20Methods: Functional Form
Source: Papke and Wooldridge, 2008; Papke and Wooldridge, 1996
Trang 2121
Trang 22Walking and Biking to School
0.1-1.0 years
1.1-2.0 years
2.1-3.0 years
3.1-4.0 years
4.1-5.0 years
>5.0 years
Source: McDonald, et al 2015 JAPA 80(2).
Trang 23Results: SRTS Program Impacts
23
0.8 0.9
1.2 1.2
3.2 -1
Trang 24Results: SRTS Program Impacts
24
0.8 0.9
1.2 1.2
3.2 -1
• 0.9 point increase per year
• Over 5 years, a relative increase
of 25%
Source: McDonald, et al 2015 JAPA 80(2).
Trang 25Results: SRTS Program Impacts
25
0.8 0.9
1.2 1.2
3.2 -1
Trang 26Results: SRTS Program Impacts
26
Enforcement
• No statistically significant effect
0.8 0.9
1.2 1.2
3.2 -1
Trang 27Results: SRTS Program Impacts
27
0.8 0.9
1.2 1.2
3.2 -1
Trang 28Results: SRTS Program Impacts
28
0.8 0.9
1.2 1.2
3.2 -1
• Relative increase
of 20%
Source: McDonald, et al 2015 JAPA 80(2).
Trang 30Work @ ITS
30
Image Source: http://www.basf-new-business.com/
Trang 31Source: The Atlantic
31
Declining licensure & mobility
Impacts and explanations
Millennial Travel
Image Source: New York Times Image Source: The Atlantic
Trang 32The Millennial Economy: Links between
Transport and Work for a New
Generation
Image Source: https://www.sccsc.edu/client/NewsDetail.aspx?id=9381
Changing Nature of Workforce Transition
& Role of Transport
as Barrier/Facilitator
32
Trang 33Tradeoffs between Environmental
Benefits and Social Exclusion: Are There Risks to the Downturn in Driving?
Trang 34Children’s Travel
34
Image Source: http://www.perey.com/images/social_networking.jpg
Walking and Biking Health
Physical Activity
Pollution Intake
-Air Quality &
Physical Activity
Trang 35noreen@unc.edu
N.McDonald@leeds.ac.uk
35