Chapter 1: Organometallic chemistry of clusters containing osmium or ruthenium and the heavier group 15 elements 2.1... Chapter 1 Organometallic chemistry of clusters containing osmium
Trang 1REACTIVITY OF THE OSMIUM-ANTIMONY CLUSTER Os3(CO)10(µ-H)(µ-SbPh2) WITH SOME GROUP 16
2010
Trang 2Acknowledgements
First of all, I would like to thank my supervisors, A/P Fan Wai Yip, A/P Leong Weng Kee and A/P Richard Wong Chee Seng for their patient guidance and invaluable advice throughout the project
Next, I would like to thank all the members of the groups In particular, I would like to express my gratitude to Seah Ling, Kien Voon, Garvin, Xue Ping, Rakesh, Boon Ying and Kai Ning, for their help, support and fruitful discussions
I am also grateful to all the staff in the instrument labs for making data acquisition possible
Last but not least, I would like to thank my lovely family members for their prayers and motivation support that made the project complete
Trang 3Chapter 1: Organometallic chemistry of clusters containing osmium
or ruthenium and the heavier group 15 elements
2.1 Reaction of Os3(CO)10(µ-H)(µ-SbPh2) with REER and PhEH p.16
Trang 44.3 Synthesis of organometallic clusters containing transition
metal- lanthanide bonds
(a) Synthesis of Os3(CO)11[P(CH2CH2C9H7)Ph2], 13
(b) Synthesis of Os3(CO)11[P(OC4H3)Ph2], 14
p.44
p.44 p.44 4.4.3 Reaction of Cp*2Sm(THF)2 with 13 or 14
(a) Reaction with Os3(CO)11[P(CH2CH2C9H7)Ph2], 13
(b) Reaction with Os3(CO)11[P(OC4H3)Ph2], 14
p.45 p.45 p.45 4.4.4 Synthesis of (THF)Yb[(C9H7CH2CH2)PPh2]3, 15 p.45
4.4.5 Reaction of (THF)Yb[(C9H7CH2CH2)PPh2]3 with
Trang 6MOLECULAR NUMBERING SCHEME
The short line extending from Os (in the molecular structure diagrams) represents a
coordinative bond from carbon monoxide to osmium (Os-CO)
1 Os3(CO)10(µ-H)(µ-SbPh2)
Os
H Os
Os SPh
3b Os3(CO)10(µ-H)(µ-SePh)
Os
H Os
Os SePh
Trang 73c Os3(CO)10(µ-H)(µ-TePh)
Os
H Os
Os TePh
5a
5b
5c Unknown compounds from reaction of 1 or 2 with REER or REH
5d (R = Ph, Me, p-tolyl; E = S, Se, Te)
Trang 916 Unknown compounds from reaction of 11 with 15
Os Os
Os L
H
D HOs3(CO)10(µ-SbPh2)L
Os Os
Os H
L
Trang 10E HOs3(CO)10(µ-SbPh2)L
Os Os
Os L
E R
Trang 11H HOs3(CO)10(µ-SbPh2)( R2E2)or HOs3(CO)10(µ-SbPh2)(REH),
R = Ph or Me; E = S, Se or Te
Os Os
Os E
H
R
ER or H
Trang 12Abbreviations
EA Elemental Analyses
ESI Electrospray Ionization
FAB Fast Atom Bombardment
Q-Tof Quadrupole Time-of-Flight
NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
ORTEP Oak Ridge Thermal Ellipsoid Plot
THF Tetrahydrofuran
TLC Thin Layer Chromatography
Trang 13LIST OF TABLES
Trang 14
p.26
Trang 15LIST OF SCHEMES
bonds through ligand assistance
p.40
bonds through ligand assistance
p.41
Trang 16Chapter 1 Organometallic chemistry of clusters containing osmium or
ruthenium and the heavier group 15 elements
Organometallic clusters are compounds with two or more metal atoms in which metal-metal bonding is present.1 Beginning from the 1970s, numerous novel clusters have been reported every year.2 The initial stimulus was the cluster-surface analogy, i.e., a metal cluster may serve as a structural model for the interaction of organic ligands on the surface of bulk metal The gradual evolution of cluster structure, magnetic behavior, and ionization potential with increasing cluster size is another reason for the interest in cluster compounds When several transition metal atoms bind together, they tend to agglomerate in order to form the maximum number of metal-metal bonds, instead of forming chains. 3
Main group-transition metal cluster compounds have been of great interest in the field
of organometallic chemistry due to their unique structural and reactivity patterns The introduction of main group elements into a transition metal cluster framework enhances its polarity and changes the reactivity chemistry from that of the homometallic system; this is the interplay between the differing properties of the elements Furthermore, there is a steady movement towards the view that the main group elements in many such compounds should be better regarded as an integral part
of the cluster core, rather than as ligands.4-6
Of the transition metals, among those most well-studied because of their propensity to form metal-metal bonded compounds are the heavier group 8 metals – ruthenium and osmium The chemistry of these two metals are often similar, differing mainly in their reactivity The next section will therefore examine the structural types that are known
Trang 17for mixed metal clusters containing ruthenium or osmium and the heavier group 15
elements, viz., As, Sb and Bi
1.1 Structural feature
In contrast to the large number of structures known for Os-P and Ru-P clusters, there are very few examples of clusters containing osmium or ruthenium with the heavier group 15 elements Many of the clusters containing a heavier group 15 element have them present as a terminal ER3 (E = As, Sb, Bi) ligand Examples include
Os3(CO)10(AsPh3)2,7 Os3(CO)11(SbPh3),8 and Ru3(CO)9(SbPh3)(Ph2PCH2PPh2).9Clusters in which the E atom is bonded to two or more metal atoms are given in Table 1.1
In comparison with Os-P clusters, those containing a heavier group 15 element tend to adopt an open structure via M-M bond cleavage This may be due to the larger size of the heavier group 15 elements favoring bridging over a longer M…M distance As has been observed elsewhere, metal-metal bond lengths involving transition metals vary over a wide range and are very prone to steric and electronic effects of the substituents.10-11 The Ru-Ru bond lengths for the clusters in Table 1.1 span the range 2.731(1) to 3.1700(5) Å, i.e., a spread of 0.44 Å; the corresponding range for the Os-
Os bond is 2.7524(6) to 3.2332(12) Å, i.e., a spread of 0.48 Å The bridging hydride is
an example of ligand effects on metal-metal bond lengths The presence of a bridging hydride tends to lengthen the Os-Os bond, while a doubly hydride-bridged Os-Os bond tends to be contracted.10-11 The range from the M-E bond lengths are given in Table 1.2 The ranges reflect the covalent radii of the group 15 elements (1.19 Å, 1.38
Å and 1.46 Å for As, Sb and Bi, respectively.)
Trang 18Table 1.1 Known EM clusters (M = Ru, Os; E = As, Sb, Bi)
HOs2(CO)6(AsMe2)(C6H4)
H2Os3(CO)11(AsR); R = H, Me Ph
Ru2(CO)6(µ-H)(AsMe2){C6H4Cr(CO)3}
Trang 19-C6H4)L ; L = PPh3, PMe2Ph
Os3(CO)9(AsC6H4Me)(C6H3Me)
Os3(CO)8(AsC6H4Me)(C6H3Me){As(p-tolyl)3}
H2Os3(CO)9(AsC5H4SiMe3)
Os3(CO)9(µ-H)(SbPh2)(AsPh3)
Os3(CO)10(µ-H)(SbPh2)
Os3(CO)9(µ-H)(SbPh2)(C6H5)L ; L = PPh3, PMe2Ph
Ru3(CO)8(µ-H)(AsMe2){C6H4Cr(CO)3}
Ru3(CO)6(µ-CO)(AsPh2)(µ-OCC12H7)
Trang 20H2Ru3(CO)8(AsPh3)(AsPh)
H2Ru3(CO)7(AsPh3)2(AsPh)
Trang 22E E
Trang 23Table 1.2 Ranges of the M-E bond lengths
Ru-As 2.366(1)-2.8568(4) Os-As 2.406(1)-2.5730(7)
Ru-Sb 2.5973(4)-2.7905(5) Os-Sb 2.5376(11)-2.8916(6)
Ru-Bi 2.756(1)-2.839(1) Os-Bi 2.799(2)-2.923(1)
Trang 241.2 Reactivity
Earlier work from our group has shown that osmium-antimony clusters often show novel reactivity patterns which are different from the phosphorus or arsenic analogues One of the more well-studied cluster among these is Os3(CO)10(µ-H)(µ-SbPh2), 1,
which can be obtained in reasonable yield from the salt elimination reaction of [Os3(µ-H)(CO)10(µ-CO)]- and an excess of Ph2SbCl in THF (Scheme 1.1) Two other products, Os3(CO)10(µ-SbPh2)2, A, with an SbPh2 bridging a closed Os-Os edge, and [Os3(CO)10(µ-H)(µ-SbPh2)]2, B, a dimeric version of cluster 1 which comprises two
Os3(CO)10(µ-H)(µ-SbPh2) moieties linked via two SbPh2 bridges, are also obtained
Cluster A can also be obtained from the reaction of 1 and Ph2SbCl, and the Os-Os bond bridged by the SbPh2 moiety is fluxional.39
Cluster 1 undergoes nucleophilic addition reactions with two-electron donors L
(where L = EPh3, CO or tBuNC) via an Os-Os bond cleavage Depending on the identity of L, up to three isomers have been observed (Scheme 1.2).21-22 It has been established that tertiary phosphines and arsines tend to occupy equatorial positions while N and C donor ligands which are rod-like, such as nitriles and isonitriles, tend
to occupy axial positions; this has been attributed to stereoelectronic reasons;2 The axial position is electronically favored as it places poorer π-acid ligands trans to a CO,
as opposed to mutually trans COs if the ligand is in an equatorial position For phosphines and related sterically bulky ligands, the greater steric hindrance of the
axial position disfavors it In the reaction of cluster 1 with tBuNC, however, three isomers were observed, in which the isonitrile ligand occupied equatorial and axial positions.22 These adducts can undergo decarbonylation, especially at elevated
temperatures For example, the reaction of cluster 1 with AsPh3 at 65°C gave
Trang 26Os3(CO)9(µ-H)(µ-SbPh2)(AsPh3), F, in which all the three Os-Os bonds remained
intact and the AsPh3 occupied an equatorial position on the unique unbridged osmium.21
Os
H Os
Os L
Os H
L SbPh2 +
L = EPh3, CO, tBuNC;
Trang 27In contrast to the above, the reactivity of 1 with the chalcogens are unexplored The
contribution of transition metal-carbonyl compounds and the chalcogens introduces novel structural and reactivity features For example, it has been found that
Os3(CO)12-n(NCCH3)n (n = 1 or 2) reacted with R2E2 (R = Ph or Me; E = S, Se or Te)
to afford clusters Os3(CO)10(µ-ER)2, G, in two isomeric forms G1 and G2. 46-48 In line with our general interest in transition metal-main group element mixed-metal clusters,
we embarked on an exploration of the chemistry of 1 with some compounds of the
E R
Trang 281.3 References
1 Mingos, D M P.; Wales, D J Introduction to Cluster Chemistry, 1990
2 Deeming, A J In Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry II; Abel, E W.; Stone,
F G A.; Wilkinson, G.; Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, 1995; Vol 7, Chap 12, pp
5 Whitmire, K H Adv Organomet Chem 1998, 42, 1
6 Leong, W K Bull Sing N I C 1996, 24, 51
7 Bradford, C W.; Nyholm, R S J Chem Soc., Dalton Trans 1973, 529
8 J N Nicholls, M D Vargas, Inorg Synth 1989, 28, 232
9 Shawkataly, O.; Ramalingam, K.; Fun, H K.; Abdul Rahman, A.; Razak, I A J
Cluster Sci 2004, 15, 387
10 Pomeroy, R K In Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry II; Abel, E W.; Stone,
F G A.; Wilkinson, G.; Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, 1995; Vol 7, Chap 15, pp
14 Guldner, K.; Johnson, B F G.; Lewis, J J Organomet Chem 1988, 355, 419
15 Cullen, W R.; Rettig, S J.; Zhang, H Organometallic 1993, 12, 1964
16 Arce, A J.; Deeming, A J J Chem Soc., Dalton Trans 1982, 1155
17 Cooksey, C J.; Deeming, A J.; Rothwell, I P J Chem Soc., Dalton Trans 1981,
1718
18 Guldner, K.; Johnson, B F G.; Lewis, J.; Owen, S M.; Raithby, P R J
Organomet Chem 1988, 341, C45
Trang 2919 Tay, C T.; Leong, W K J Organomet Chem., 2001, 625, 231
20 Chan, K H; Leong, W K.; Mak, K H Garvin Organometallic, 2006, 25, 250
21 Chen, G.; Leong, W K J Chem Soc., Dalton Trans 1998, 2489
22 Chen, G.; Leong, W K J Organomet Chem 1999, 574, 276
23 Deng, M.; Leong, W K Organometallics 2002, 21, 1221
24 Chen, G.; Leong, W K Organometallic 2001, 20, 2280
25 Chen, G.; Deng, M.; Lee, C K.; Leong, W K.; Tan, J.; Tay, C T J Organomet
Chem 2006, 691, 387
26 Chen, G.; Deng, M.; Lee, C K.; Leong, W K Organomeallic 2002, 21, 1227
27 Knox, S A R.; Lloyd, B R.; Morton, D A V.; Nicholls, S M.; Orpen, A G.;
Vinas, J M.; Weber, M.; Williams, G K J Organomet Chem 1990, 394, 385
28 Ang, H G.; Ang, S G.; Du, S W J Organomet Chem 1999, 590, 1
29 Johnson, B F G.; Lewis, J.; Massey, A D.; Braga, D.; Grepioni, F J Organomet
Chem 1989, 369, C43
30 Jackson, P A.; Johnson, B F G.; Lewis, J.; Massey, A D.; Braga, D.; Gradella, C.;
Grepioni, F J Organomet Chem 1990, 391, 225
31 Arce, A J.; Deeming, A J.; DeSanctis, Y.; Garcia, A M.; Manzur, J.; Spodine, E
34 De Silva, R M.; Mays, M J.; Solan, G A J Organomet Chem 2002, 664, 27
35 Süss-Fink, G.; Guldner, K.; Herberhold, M.; Gieren' A.; Huebner, T J Organomet
Chem 1985, 279, 447
36 Chen, G.; Leong, W K J Cluster Sci 2006, 17, 111
37 Ang, H G.; Hay, C M.; Johnson, B F G.; Lewis, J.; Raithby, P R.; Whitton, A J
J Organomet Chem 1987, 330, C5
38 Gremaud, G.; Jungbluth, H.; Stoeckli-Evans, H.; Süss-Fink, G J Organomet Chem
1990, 388, 351
Trang 3039 Chen, G.; Leong, W K J Chem Soc., Dalton Trans 2000, 4442
40 Lee, Y W.; Ph.D thesis, National University of Singapore, 1995
41 Ang, H G.; Ang, S G.; Du, S.; Sow, B H.; Wu, X J Chem Soc., Dalton Trans
1999, 2799
42 Cullen, W R.; Rettig, S J; Zheng, T C Organometallic 1995, 14, 1466
43 Field, J S.; Haines, R J.; Smit, D N J Organomet Chem 1982, 240, C23
44 Deng, M.; Leong, W K J Chem Soc., Dalton Trans 2002, 1020
45 Chen, G.; Leong, W K Organometallic 2001, 20, 5771
46 Johnson, B F G In Transition Metal Clusters; Johnson, B F G.; Ed.; Wiley:
Chichester, 1980; Chap 1
47 Arce, A J.; Arrojo, P.; De Sanctis, Y Polyhedron 1992, 11, 1013
48 Zhang, J.; Leong, W K J Chem Soc., Dalton Trans 2000, 1249
Trang 31Chapter 2 Reaction of Os 3 (CO) 10 (µ-H)(µ-SbPh 2 ), 1 with group 16 compounds
As mentioned in the previous chapter, antimony-containing osmium clusters are known to undergo nucleophilic addition.1-2 While triosmium clusters are known to react with group 16 elements, in contrast, the reactivity of antimony-containing osmium clusters with group 16 elements has not been explored In this section, the synthesis and reactivity of the cluster Os3(CO)10(µ-H)(µ-SbPh2), 1 with some group
16 compounds are reported
The cluster Os3(CO)10(µ-H)(µ-SbPh2), 1 reacted with an equimolar of REER or PhEH (R = Ph, Me; E = S, Se, Te) in hexane at room temperature to afford a yellow solid (5);
TLC separation of the supernatant gave several bands in low yields, of which the two
major ones (3 and 4) have been characterised (Scheme 2.1)
Os
H Os
Os RE
Os
ER
Unknown Hex RT
5a: R = Ph, E = S 5b: R = Ph, E = Se 5c: R = Ph, E = Te 5d: R = Me, E = Se
Trang 32The identities of Os3(CO)10(µ-H)(µ-SPh) (3a), Os3(CO)10(µ-H)(µ-SePh) (3b),
Os3(CO)10(µ-H)(µ-TePh) (3c) and Os3(CO)10(µ-H)(µ-SeMe) (3d) were made on the
basis of their IR spectra in the carbonyl region and bridging hydride resonance in their 1
H NMR spectra, which matched those reported earlier;3-5 the IR spectrum for 3a
2000 2050
2100 2150
Trang 33The profiles of the CO stretching vibrations of 4a and 4b were similar, indicating that
they were analogous products (Figure 2.2) The pattern was also different from that for the two known clusters Os3(CO)10(µ-SbPh2)(µ-EPh2) (E = P or Sb, 4e and 4f,
respectively), in particular, an extra peak at 2031 cm-1 or 2029 cm-1 was observed for
2000 2050
2100 2150
tabulated values for 4b, 4e and 4f.6