The influence of pre-failure soil stiffness on the numerical analysis of tunnel construction.. Three-dimensional simulation of slurry shield tunneling, Geotechnical Aspects of Undergroun
Trang 1REFERENCES
Abu-Farsakh M Y and Voyiadjis G Z (1999) Computational model for the simulation of the shield tunnelling process in cohesive soils International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 23, pp.23-44
ACI (1989) Building code requirements for structural concrete (318-99) and commentary 99), American Concrete Institute
(318R-Addenbrooke T I, Potts D M and Puzrin A M (1997) The influence of pre-failure soil stiffness on the numerical analysis of tunnel construction Geotechnique 47, No 3, pp.693-712
Anand S, Leong E C and Cheong H K (2001) The use of a Continuous Surface Wave Measurement System for in situ characterisation of soil Proceedings of the International Conference on Insitu Measurement of Soil Properties and Case Histories, Bali, pp 139-144
Augarde C E, Burd H J and Houlsby G T (1998) Some experiences of modelling tunnelling in
Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering, Udine, 14-16 October 1998, pp.603-612
Augarde C E and Burd H J (2001) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of lined tunnels International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 25, pp 243-262 Bezuijen A and Schrier J V D (1994) The influence of a bored tunnel on pile foundations CENTRIFUGE 94, Singapore Leung, Lee & Tan (eds)., pp.681-686
Bloodworth A G (2002) Three-dimensional analysis of tunnelling effects on structures to develop design methods, PhD thesis, University of Oxford
Bond A J and Jardine R J (1991) Effects of installing displacement piles in a high OCR clay Geotechnique 41, No 3, pp 341-363
Bransby and Springman (1996) 3-D Finite element modelling of pile groups adjacent to surcharge loads Computers and Geotechnics, Vol 19, No 4, pp.301-324
Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Singapore, Volume 2, pp.41-75
Broms B B and Pandey P C (1987) Influence of ground movements from tunnelling on adjacent piles and remedial measures 5th International Geotechnical Seminar, Case Histories in Soft Clays, Singapore
Brown D A and Shie C F (1990) Three dimensional finite element model of laterally loaded piles Computers and Geotechnics, pp.59-79
BS5930 (1981) Code of Practice for Site Investigations British Standards Institution, London BS8004 (1986) Code of practice for foundations British Standards Institution, London
Trang 2BS8110 (1997) Structure use of concrete Part 1: Code of practice for design and construction British Standards Institution, London
Buhan P D and Salencon J (1987) Analyse de la stabite des ouvrages en sols renforces par une methode d’homogeneisation Revue Francasise de Geotechnique, No 41, pp.29-43
Burland J B, Standing J R and Jardine F M (2002) Building response to tunnelling Case studies from construction of the Jubilee Line Extension, London Thomas Telford, London
Chandler R J and Martins J P (1982) An experimental study of skin friction around piles in clay Geotechnique 32, No 2, pp 119-132
Chapman DN, Rogers C D F and Hunt D V L (2004) Predicting the settlements above twin
Cheng C Y, Dasari G R, Leung C F, Chow Y K and Rosser H B (2004) 3D numerical study of
Cheung Y K, Lee P K K and Zhao W B (1991) Elastoplastic analysis of soil-pile interaction Computers and Geotechnics 12, pp.115-132
Chow Y K, Lim C H and Karunaratne G P (1996) Numerical modeling of negative skin friction
on pile groups Computer and Geotechnics, 18, No 3, pp.201-224
Professional
Comodromos E M, Anagnostopoulos C T and Georgiadis M K (2003) Numerical assessment of axial pile group response based on load tests Computer and Geotechnics, Vol 30 (6), pp.505-516 Coutts D R and Wang J (2000) Monitoring of reinforced concrete piles under horizontal and vertical loads due to tunneling Tunnels and Underground Structures, Zhao, Shirlaw & Khrisnan (eds), Singapore, pp 541-546
Dames and Moore (1983) Mass rapid transit system, Singapore: Detailed geotechnical study Interpretative Report, Provisional Mass Rapid Transit Authority, Singapore
Trang 3Dasari G R (1996) Modelling the variation of soil stiffness during sequential construction PhD thesis, Cambridge University
Deane A P and Bassett R H (1995) The Heathrow trial tunnel Proceeding of Institution of Civil Engineering: Geotechnical Engineering, 113, pp.144-156
Dias D, Kastner R & Maghazi M (2000) Three-dimensional simulation of slurry shield tunneling, Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, Kusakabe, Fujita & Miyazaki (eds), pp 351-356
Ding W Q, Yue Z Q, Tham L G, Zhu H H, Lee C F and Hashimoto T (2004) Analysis of shield tunnel Int’ Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 28, pp.57-91
International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm
Ellis E A and Springman S M (2001) Full-height piled bridge abutments constructed on soft clay Geotechnique 51, No 1, pp 3-14
Ellis E A and Springman S M (2001) Modelling of soil-structure interaction for a piled bridge abutment in plane strain FEM analyses Computer and Geotechnics 28, pp.79-98
Fellenius B H (1989) Tangent modulus of piles determined from strain data Foundation Engineering: Current principles and practices, Vol 1 (F H Kulhawy eds.) Proceeding of the congress, Eyanston, Illinois, June 25-29, 1989
Fellenius B H (2001) From strain measurements to load in an instrumented pile Geotechnical News Magazine, Vol 19, No 1, pp 35-38
Feng S H, Leung C F, Chow Y K and Dasari G R (2002) Centrifuge modeling of pile responses
2002, pp G31-36
Intenational Symposium on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, Mair & Taylor (eds), pp 677-682
Fujita K (1989) Special Lecture B: Underground construction, tunnel, underground
de Janeiro, 19892, pp.159-2176
Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, pp.77-80
Georgiannou V N, Rampello S and Silvestri F (1991) Static and dynamic measurement of
on Soil Mechanics, Florence, Vol 1, pp.91-96
Goh A T C, Wong K S, Teh C I and Wen D (2003) Pile response adjacent to braced excavation Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, April 2003, pp.383-386
Trang 4Guedes P F M de Melo and Pereira C S (2000) The role of the soil Ko value in numerical analysis
of shallow tunnels Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground Kusakabe, Fujita & Miyazaki (eds), pp.379-384
Gunn M J (1993) The prediction of surface settlement profiles due to tunnelling Predictive soil mechanics Thomas Telford, London, pp.305-316
Hergarden H J A M, Poel J T and Schrier J S (1996) Ground movements due to tunnelling:
Underground Construction in Soft Ground, Mair & Taylor (eds), pp 519-524
Hermann L R and Al-Yassin Z (1978) Numerical analysis of reinforced soil systems Proc ASCE Earth Reinforcement Symposium, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, pp.428-457
Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorenson Inc (2001) ABAQUS User’s manual, Version 6.31
Hull T S (1987) The behaviour of laterally loaded piles PhD thesis University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Ikeda S, Saito T, Huang Y and Mori A (1996) Settlement of storehouses during the passage of
Underground Construction in Soft Ground Mair & Taylor (eds), pp 367-372
Inose J, Irie H and Saitoh S (1992) Construction of large cross-section shield tunnel directly below extremely large building in Tokyo Towards New Worlds in Tunnelling, Vieitez-Utesa & Montanez-Cartaxo (eds), pp.549-556
Jacobsz S W, Standing J R, Mair R J and Hagiwara T (2002) Centrifuge modelling of tunnelling
Construction in Soft Ground, Toulouse, France, pp.89-94
Jacobsz S W, Bowers K H, Moss N A and Zanardo G (2005) The effects of tunneling on piled
Construction in Soft Ground, 15-17 June 2005, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Jardine R J (1991) The cyclic behaviour of offshore piles Chapter in ‘The cyclic Loading of Soils’, Brown and O’Reilly eds, Blackie & Son
Jardine R J, Potts D M, Fourie A B and Burland J B (1986) Studies of the influence of non-linear stress-strain characteristics in soil-structure interaction Geotechnique 36, No 3, pp.377-396 Jeong S, Kim S and Briaud J L (1997) Analysis of downdrag on pile groups by the finite element method Computers and Geotechnics, Vol 21, No 2, pp.143-161
Kaalberg F J, Teunissen E A H, van Tol A F and Bosch J W (2005) Dutch research on the impact
Underground Construction in Soft Ground, 15-17 June 2005, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
KarWinn, Rahardjo H and Seh C P (2001) Characterisation of residual soils in Singapore Geotechnical Engineering, 23(1), pp 1-14
Trang 5Kimura T and Mair R J (1981) Centrifugal testing of model tunnels in soft clay 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm
Kitiyodom P, Matsumoto T and Kawaguchi K (2004) Analysis of piled raft foundation subjected
Conference, 22-26 November 2004, Bangkok, Thailand, pp 183-188
Knight-Hassell C K and Tan K B (2000) Tunnelling through challenging ground conditions in Singapore Proceeding of the International Conference on Tunnels and Underground Structures, Singapore, 26-29 November 2000, pp.633-638
Komiya K, Soga K, Akagi H, Hagiwara T and Bolton M (1999) Finite element modeling of excavation and advancement processes of a shield tunnlling machine Soils and Foundations, Vol
39, No 3, pp.37-52
Kovacevic N, Edmonds H E, Mair R J, Higgins K G and Potts D M (1996) Numerical modeling
Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, Mair & Taylor (eds),
Lee C H, Tan S A and Dasari G R (2002) 2-Dimensional and 3-dimensional comparisons of finite
Lee K M and Rowe R K (1989) Deformation caused by surface loading and tunnelling : the role
of elastic anisotropy Geotechnique 39, No 1, pp.125-140
Lee K M and Rowe R K (1991) An analysis of three-dimensional ground movements: the Thunder Bay tunnel Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 28, pp.25-41
Lee K M, Rowe R K and Lo K Y (1992) Subsidence owing to tunneling 1: Estimating the gap parameter Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 29, pp.929-940
Trang 6Lee R G, Turner A J and Whitworth L J (1994) Deformations caused by tunneling beneath a piled structure XIII ICSMFE, New Delhi, India, pp 873-878
Leong E C, Rahardjo H and Tang S K (2003) Characterisation and engineering properties of Singapore residual soils Proceeding of the Characterisation and engineering properties of natural soils Tan et al (eds), Singapore, pp.1279-1304
Lim K C (2003) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of earth pressure balance tunnelling PhD thesis, National University of Singapore
Lin D G, Tseng C T, Phienwej N and Suwansawat S (2002) 3-D deformation analysis of earth pressure balance shield tunneling in Bangkok subsoil Journal of Southeast Asian Geotechnical Society, April 2002, pp.13-27
Loganathan N and Poulos H G (1998) Analytical prediction for tunneling-induced ground movements in clays Journal of Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 124(9), pp.846-856
Loganathan N (1999) Effect of tunnelling adjacent to pile foundations PhD thesis University of Sydney
Loganathan N, Poulos H G and Xu K J (2001) Ground and pile-group responses due to tunnelling, Soils and Foundations, Vol 41, No 1, pp.57-67
LTA (2000) Guide to carrying out restricted activities within railway protection and safety zones, Development & Building Control Department, Land Transport Authority, Singapore
Mair R J (1979) Discussion: Effects of tunnelling on the bearing capacity and settlement of piled foundations by Morton J D and King K H, Tunnelling ’79, pp 65
Mair R J (1993) Unwin Memorial Lecture - Developments in geotechnical engineering research: application to tunnels and deep excavations Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Civil Engineering, 1993, 97 (1), pp.27-41
Mair R J, Taylor R N and Bracegirdle A (1993) Subsurface settlement profiles above tunnels in clays Geotechnique, Vol 43, No 2, pp 315-320
Mair R J, Taylor R N and Burland J B (1996) Prediction of ground movement and assessment of
Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, Mair & Taylor (eds), pp 713-718
Mair R J and Standing J R (2001) Discussion Session 3.3: Underground work in urban areas including its impact on existing infrastructure Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Volume 2, 27-31 August 2001, Istanbul, Turkey, pp.2715-2717
Maranha J R and Neves E M (2000) 3D analysis of ground displacements due to the construction
of Lisbon underground Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnical & Geological Engineering (GeoEng 200), Melbourne
Trang 7Matsumoto T, Kitiyodom P and Kawaguchi K (2005) Three-dimensional analyses of piled raft
on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, 15-17 June 2005, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Melis M, Medina L and Rodriguez J (2002) Prediction and analysis of subsidence induced by shield tunneling in the Madrid Metro extension Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39, pp.1273-
1287
Mhroueh H and Shahrour I (2002) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the interaction between tunneling and pile foundations, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol.26, pp.217-230
Moroto N, Ohno M and Fujimoto A (1995) Observational control of shield tunneling adjacent to
Japan, Fujita & Kusakabe (eds), pp 241-244
Morton J D and King K H (1979) Effects of tunneling on the bearing capacity and settlement of piled foundations, Tunnelling ’79, pp 57-64
Nakajima M, Saitoh S and Nakamura H (1992) Planning of underground railway directly below extremely large overhead expressway piers in Tokyo Towards New Worlds in Tunnelling, Vieitez-Utesa & Montanez-Cartaxo (eds), pp 81-88
Naylor D J (1982) A study of reinforced earth walls allowing strip slip Proc ASCE Earth Reinforcement Symposium, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, pp.618-643
Ng C W W, Sun Y F and Lee K M (1998) Laboratory measurements of small strain stiffness of granitic saprolites Geotechnical Engineering Journal, SEAGS, Vol 29, No 2
Ng C W W, Pun W K and Pang R P L (2000) Small strain stiffness of natural granitic saprolite in Hong Kong Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol 126, No 9
Ng C W W and Wang Y (2001) Field and laboratory measurements of small strain stiffness of decomposed granites Soils and Foundations, Vol 41, No 3, pp.57-71
Ong J C W, Chen D C and Nadarajah P (1999) A summary of preliminary pile load test results for North East Line Proceeding of International Conference on Rail Transit, Singapore, pp.689-702 Osborne N, Noren C, Li G J, Chinniah R and Jonsson P (2004) Design and construction of MRT
Trang 8Peck R B (1969) Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground Proceeding of 14th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol 3, Hamburg, pp.1469-1472
Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Hamburg, Germany
Plaxis B V (2004) Validation and verification manual for Plaxis 3D Tunnel, Version 2 (Brinkgreve and Broere eds.)
Southeast Asian Geotechnical Conference, Kuala Lumpur, pp 3.1-3.9
Potts D M and Zdravkovic L (2001) Finite element analysis in geotechnical engineering: Application, Thomas Telford, London
Richards D J and Powrie W (1994) Finite element analysis of construction sequences for propped retaining walls Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Engineering, 107, pp.207-216
Rowe R K, Lo K Y and Kack G J (1983) A method of estimating surface settlement above tunnel constructed in soft ground Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol 20, pp.11-22
Sawatparnich A and Kulhawy F H (2004) Simplified model to predict pile response caused by
Bangkok, Thailand, pp 697-702
Geotechnique 20, No 2, pp.129-170
Selemetas D, Standing J R, Mair R J, Sharrocks D M, Parker F and Allen R (2002) The response
Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, Toulouse, France
Trang 9Selemetas D, Standing J R and Mair R J (2005) The response of full-scale piles to tunnelling 5thInternational Symposium on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, 15-17 June 2005, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Shirlaw J N (2000) Discussion: Can settlement be accurately predicted using advanced numerical method Geotechnical Aspect of Underground Construction in Soft Ground Fujita & Miyazaki (eds)
Shirlaw J N, Ong J C W, Rosser H B, Tan C G, Osborne N H and Heslop P E (2003) Local settlements and sinkholes due to EPB tunneling Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Geotechnical Engineering Issue GE4, pp.193-211
Shirlaw J N, Richards D P, Ramond P and Longchamp P (2004) Recent experience in automatic tail void grouting with soft ground tunnel boring machines ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress, 22-27 May 2004, Singapore
Sousas L M R, Arslan U, Katzenbach R, Festag G and Dolz K (2001) Numerical analysis of a shield driven tunnel in Lisbon Modern Tunneling Science and Technology, Adachi et al (eds.), pp.625-628
Stewart D P (1992) Lateral loading of piled bridge abutments due to embankment construction PhD thesis, University of Western Australia
Stewart D P, Jewell R J and Randolph M F (1993) Numerical modelling of piled bridge abutments on soft ground Computer and Geotechnics 15, pp.21-46
Sujardinata J, Carter J P, Hull T S and Poulos H G (2005) Analysis of effects of tunnelling on
in Soft Ground, 15-17 June 2005, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Swoboda G (1979) Finite element analysis of the New Austrian Tunnelling Method (NATM),
pp.581-586
Swoboda G and Abu-Krisha A (1999) Three-dimensional numerical modeling for TBM tunneling
in consolidated clay Journal of Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol 14, No 3, pp.327-333
Takahashi K, Fukazawa N, Hagiwara T and Hosoda M (2004) Observational control of slurry
World Tunnel Congress, Singapore
Tan S B, Tan S L, Lim T L and Yang K S (1988) Landslide problems and their control in
1, pp 25-36
Taylor R N and Grant R J (1998) Centrifuge modelling of the influence of surface structures on tunnelling induced ground movements Tunnels and Metropolises, Negro Jr & Ferreira (eds), pp.261-266
Trang 10Teh C I and Wong K S (1995) Analysis of downdrag on pile groups Geotechnique 45, No 2, pp.191-207
Tham K S and Deutscher M S (2000) Tunnelling under Woodleigh Workers’ Quarters on Contract C705 Tunnels and Underground Structures, Zhao, Shirlaw & Krishnan (eds), pp 241-
249
Tomlinson M J (1977) Pile design and construction practice Viewpoint publication
Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Florence, Italy, pp.869-872
Viggiani G and Atkinson J H (1995) Stiffness of fine-grained soil at very small strains Geotechnique 45, No.2, PP.249-265
Wakai A, Gose S and Ugai K (1999) 3-D elasto-plastic finite element analyses of pile foundations subjected to lateral loading Soils and Foundations, Vol 39, No 1, pp.97-111
Wang X N (2003) Field monitoring and back-analysis of soldiers piles retaining wall for deep excavation PhD thesis, National University of Singapore
Wood D M (1990) Soil behaviour and critical state soil mechanics Cambridge University Press Yang K S and Tang S K (1997) Stabilising the slope of Bukit Gombak Proceedings of 3YGEC, Singapore, pp 589-605
Yang Z H and Jeremic B (2003) Numerical study of group effects for pile groups in sands International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 27, pp.1255-1276 Yong K Y, Lee F H, Tan T S and Lee S L (1998) Excavation near critical structures bridging
November 1998, Taipei, Taiwan, pp 69-80
Yong K Y and Pang C H (2004a) Geotechnical challenges of the mass rapid transit (MRT) system
in Singapore Special lecture, Malaysian Geotechnical Conference, 15-17 March 2004, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia, pp.119-130
Yong K Y and Pang C H (2004b) Effects of construction of underground Mass Rapid Transit on
November 2004, Bangkok, Thailand
Zhou Y (2001) Engineering geology and rock mass properties of the Bukit Timah Granite Proceedings of Underground Singapore 2001, Singapore, pp.308-314
Zhu H (1999) Evaluation of load transfer behavior of bored piles in residual soil incorporating construction effect PhD thesis, Nanyang Technological University
Zhu H and Chang M F (2002) Load transfer curves along bored piles considering modulus degradation Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental engineering, September issue, pp 764-774
Trang 11APPENDIX A PILE STIFFNESS FOR MRT NEL C704
First, the tangent modulus method proposed by Fellenius (1989) was used to derive the variation
of modulus with strain based on a pile load test carried out The pile tested had a similar concrete mix, reinforcement and installation procedure as other piles at the viaducts The pile was instrumented with thirty-two vibrating wire strain gauges and three telltale extensometers According to Fellenius (1989), the tangent modulus is represented as follow:-
B A
Where as the secant modulus to be used for converting strain to stress is as follow:-
B A
i.e initial tangent modulus (GPa) Figure A.1 shows a plot of the tangent modulus against the strain based on all the strain gauges and tell-tales in the pile By curve fitting, At is derived as -0.02 GPa/µε and B is within 30 to 50 GPa There seems to be a large variation between the upper and lower bounds This is likely to be due to the amount of shaft resistance mobilised at different depth The larger the shaft resistance, the lower the tangent modulus line (Fellenius, 2001) Another possibility could be due to the bored pile installation method The concrete was poured by tremie pipe and did not go through vibrating compaction, which leads to non-uniform property at different depth
approximate method by ACI (1989) as follows:
Trang 12c
from cube strength Ultimately, the modulus was derived as 28.65GPa
Strain gauge and telltale data at 1st cycle
A B D E F G H I J K L M N O TT2 TT1
Figure A.1 Tangent modulus derived from a pile load test
Trang 13-100 -50
SB
Tunnel springline
NB Tunnel
SB Tunnel
Tunnel springline
(a) (b) Figure A.2 Influence of (a) non-uniform strain distribution and (b) pile stiffness in the
interpretation of axial force in pile
Trang 14APPENDIX B PILE MOMENT OF INERTIA FOR MRT NEL C704
interpretation of bending moment Depending on the significance of bending moment, the pile section could be in an un-cracked state (Ipile=Igross), fully cracked (Ipile=Icracked) or in between In order to investigate the appropriateness of the moment of inertia adopted, all the bending moments
z
I f
where fr is the modulus of rupture of concrete and is equal to 19 7 fc' (in kPa) as recommended
by ACI (1989), z is the distance from the centroid to the extreme fibre of the pile in tension (m)
and Igross is the gross moment of inertia (m4) which is calculated as
64
.D pile4
π
Figure B.1 shows the bending moment computed for all the 1.2m diameter instrumented piles
of the piles stayed within the cracked moment envelope after the two tunnels were driven However, there were some points within the piles where bending moment exceeded the cracked moment (particularly at Pier 11) It is observed that the bending moments exceeding the cracked moment were developed during the construction of the viaduct bridge (which exerted further loading on the piles)
Trang 15Despite some points exceeding the cracked state, bending moment to be presented subsequently is
exceeding cracked moment would over-estimate the actual bending moment Further assessment
of the effective moment of inertia is not within the scope of this research
-1500 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500
Trang 16-2000 -1000
1.6m
P2 P1
-3 -2
-1 0
P2 P1
-10 -5
0 Pile lateral deflection - transverse (mm)
Pile P1 (SDMCC) Pile P1 (NLES)
SB
1.6m
P2 P1
Trang 17C.2 Comparison of pile responses between 3-D tunnel advancement and plane strain tunnel procedures
-10000 -5000
Plane strain tunnel (WL) With WL, Gmax/p'=800, VL=1%, Lp/Htun=3.0, Xpile/Dtun=1.0
-5 0
-5 0
Pile lateral deflection - transverse (mm)
With WL, Gmax/p'=800, VL=1%, Lp/Htun=3.0, Xpile/Dtun=1.0
Figure C.2 Comparison of pile responses with respect to different numerical simulation procedures (a) Pile axial force (b) Pile
settlement (c) Pile lateral deflection
Trang 18APPENDIX D OTHER INFLUENCING FACTORS IN
PLANE STRAIN FE ANALYSIS
The calibration charts as presented in Chapter 6 only hold for the assumed cases particularly the
simulation These assumptions are further investigated here
D.1 Effect of soil model
To-date, there are probably hundreds of constitutive models available which allows the characteristics of soil to be modelled Therefore, it is impossible to investigate every one of the models At here, the commonly used ‘Mohr-Coulomb’ model is compared to the ‘Non-linear elastic’ model The tunnel-pile configuration and dimension remained the same in both analyses Total stress analysis was carried out with the Young’s modulus of soil, Eu of 30,000kPa, undrained
convergence plots for both the pile horizontal deflection and pile head settlement It can be observed that the modification factors differ up to two times for the two different models Strictly speaking, it is hard to justify the variation of modification factors for different soil models since the input parameters also play a role in determining the factors It is not within the scope of this study to quantify the effect of soil model
D.2 Effect of soil earth pressure at-rest
All the analyses that have been presented so far assumed the soil earth pressure at-rest, Ko of 1.0
than 1.0 in stiff over-consolidated soil Figure D.2 shows a comparison of convergence and the
Trang 19corresponding modification factor between Ko of 1.0 and 1.5 in non-linear elastic model As can
pile horizontal deflection and pile head settlement However, it should be noted that the influence
of Ko parameter is highly dependent on the type of soil model adopted
Figure D.1 Influence of soil model on pile stiffness modification factor
0 50 100 150 200 250
2D response = 3D single pile response
2D response = 3D single pile response
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Pile head sett (Mohr Coulomb)
Trang 20D.3 Effect of twin tunnel simulation
The modification factor as investigated in Chapter 6 assumed a single tunnel simulation However,
in practice, there is a likelihood of encountering multiple tunnels interaction Study was also carried out to investigate the sensitivity of twin tunnels on the modification factor Two cases were simulated; single pile and one-row pile group Figures E.3a and b show respectively the typical 3-
D and 2-D mesh adopted for simulation of the twin tunnels which are located on each side of the single pile Equal distance between tunnel and pile was modelled on each side of the pile (i.e
described in Section 6.4.2 Figures D.4a and b compare the convergence obtained for pile horizontal deflection and pile head settlement respectively From the negligible differences, it can
be concluded that the modification factor is not affected by the twin tunnels in both single pile and one-row pile group