Proline rich acidic protein 1 in life and death 5

These results strongly suggest that PRAP1 knockdown increases the sensitivity of cells to DNA damage by genotoxic agents and modulates cell fate by increasing cell death via caspase 8- a

pathways were activated in this caspase-dependent apoptosis induced by the inhibition of PRAP1 in response to 5-FU treatment

Collectively, our results indicate that PRAP1 repression enhanced caspase-dependent apoptosis in cells treated with 5-FU These results strongly suggest that PRAP1 knockdown increases the sensitivity of cells to DNA damage by genotoxic agents and modulates cell fate by increasing cell death via caspase 8- and 9-dependent apoptosis

3.11 Other m echanisms em ployed b y PRAP1 inhibition is e nhancing cell death

3.11.1 Effect of PRAP1 on cytoskeleton

3.11.1.1 Effects of PRAP1 on cellular morphology

Our results showed that repression of PRAP1 in p53-/- cells enhanced the cell death at high dose of 5-FU independent of cell cycle arrest interference, suggesting the involvement of other mechanism in addition to its role in p21 regulation As the PRAP1 knockdown cells showed a distinct morphology, we investigated whether PRAP1 plays a role in the maintenance of cytoskeleton As shown in phase contrast pictures of Figure 3.67, the morphology of cells with perturbed PRAP1 expression was distinctively different from that of their respective controls In cells with overexpression of PRAP1, a more elongated morphology was displayed, and the volume of the cells was much reduced as compared to control The cells grew in less-defined clusters, and were more scattered The nuclei of cells with overexpression of PRAP1 were also smaller and disoriented, compared to the nuclei of the control cells that were well-spaced in an orderly manner Conversely, in cells with PRAP1 knockdown, a more rounded

139

morphology was observed (Figure 3.67) The cellular volume was also reduced and the organization of cells in a cluster was less orderly These results indicated that perturbation of PRAP1 expression either by overexpression or knockdown resulted in cellular morphological changes

3.11.1.2 Effects PRAP1 on actin filament

To study the effect of PRAP1 on the organization of F-actin, an important cytoskeletal protein, we stained F-actin with Phalloidin-Alexa Fluor 488 As shown in Figure 3.67, the untransfected and vector control cells displayed an extensive network of actin filaments The actin microfilaments are mainly found

in cortical structures forming characteristic ruffles There are also numerous long stress fibers that traversed the cells Interestingly, in cells with PRAP1 overexpression, there was an obvious reorganization of actin filaments There was

a significant reduction in the amount of stress fibers formed F-actin was found to accumulate at the periphery of the cell

The organization of actin in the control siRNA treated cells was similar to that of the untransfected and vector control cells, indicating that transfection of siRNA did not affect the actin network Conversely, in cells with PRAP1 knockdown, reorganization of actin filaments were observed The architecture of actin network was severely disrupted There was also a marked reduction in the number of stress fibers formed The actin microfilaments were highly concentrated on the periphery of the cells Both overexpression and knockdown of PRAP1 gene resulted in similar effect on the actin network, suggesting that PRAP1 may act as a biphasic protein Collectively, these results indicated that

Figure 3.67 Effects of PRAP1 on actin network

Representative immunofluorescence images of F-actin in HCT 116 cells stably expressing PRAP1 (PRAP1) and its empty vector control stable cell line (Vector), or after transfection of control siRNA and PRAP1 siRNA for 72 hours F-actin was stained using Palloidine conjugated to FITC (Green) and nuclear was counter stained with Hoechst (Blue)

141

3.11.1.3 Effects of PRAP1 on microtubules

To further study the effect of PRAP1 on cytoskeleton, we also looked at the other important cytoskeletal network, the microtubules As shown in Figure 3.68, the vector control cells displayed a very organized network of tubulin with a distinct microtubule organizing center (MTOC) Similar findings were also observed with the control siRNA treated cells Interestingly, in the cells with overexpression of PRAP1, there was no obvious MTOC found The intensity of staining was also much reduced than that of the control cells The architecture of the microtubulin network was not well-organized as that of the control cells Similar findings were also observed in the cells with PRAP1 knockdown These results indicated that PRAP1 affects the organization of microtubules with a major defect in the formation of MTOC

3.11.2 PRAP1 interacts with Hsp 70

In order to study the possible mechanism employed by PRAP1 in protecting the cells against genotoxic stress, we investigated its potential binding partners Briefly, cells were treated with 5-FU or UV and cell lysates were harvested Possible binding partners of PRAP1 were pulled down using glutathione beads conjugated to GST-PRAP1 Proteins bound to GST-PRAP1 were then analyzed on SDS-PAGE gel and visualized using silver staining Figure 3.69 shows a representative SDS-PAGE gel picture of the pulled down proteins Unique bands (indicated in arrow) from GST-PRAP1 beads alone or GST beads alone were excised and processed for MS-MS analysis After subjecting these bands to peptide mass fingerprinting analysis, Hsp 70 was identified as a possible

Figure 3.68 Effects of PRAP1 on microtubulin network

Representative immunofluorescence images of microtubules in HCT 116 cells stably expressing PRAP1 (PRAP1) and its empty vector control stable cell line (Vector), or after transfection of control siRNA and PRAP1 siRNA for 72 hours Anti-tubulin antibody was used to stain the microtubulin network (Green) and nuclear was counter stained with Hoechst (Blue)

143

binding partner for PRAP1 (Figure 3.71) To validate our pull-down result, immunoprecipitation was performed Briefly, cells were transfected with pcDNA-PRAP1

Figure 3.69 GST-PRAP1 pull-down

Representative silver staining picture of pull-down assay with GST-PRAP1 using HCT 116 lysate treated with 5-FU for 24 hours Lane 1: GST beads alone; Lane 2: GST-PRAP1 beads with lysate; Lane 3: GST-PRAP1 beads alone; Lane 4: protein ladder Unique bands (arrow) as compared to controls (the glutathione beads conjugated with GST and the GST-PRAP1 bead) were excised for MS-MS

analysis

Figure 3.70 Identification of PRAP1 binding protein by MS-MS

Representative figure showing the identification of PRAP1 binding proteins after performing MS-MS

Figure 3.71 PRAP1 physically interacts with Hsp 70

Representative western blot of PRAP1 after immunoprecipitation (IP) with Hsp

70 antibody Total: Input lysate; IgG: IP with IgG antibody; Hsp 70: IP with Hsp

70 antibody