A study on the prosodic features in responses via English and the equivalent expressions in Vietnamese

Nguyễn Thị Bích Ngọc Năm bảo vệ: 2010 Abstract: The study aims at prosodic features in responses via English and the equivalent expressions in Vietnamese.. On the other hands, the the

via English and the equivalent expressions in

Vietnamese Nguyễn Thị Việt Hoa

Trường Đại học Ngoại Ngữ Luận văn ThS Chuyên ngành: English Linguistics; Mã số: 60 22 15

Người hướng dẫn: M.A Nguyễn Thị Bích Ngọc

Năm bảo vệ: 2010

Abstract: The study aims at prosodic features in responses via English and the equivalent

expressions in Vietnamese This paper includes three main parts: Introduction, Development and Conclusion Each part is the illustration of the researcher with an aim to prove and find out new things in linguistics This is a kind of case study because it researches the responses

in class setting All the contributions were collected from data of interviews and observation

On the other hands, the thesis focuses on the analyzing of agreement and disagreement responses between teachers and students so that intonation, speech acts were taken into consideration The results of the study were established in the last chapter in which all the questions and aims were done

Keywords: Tiếng Anh; Kỹ năng nói; Ngôn điệu; Ngữ điệu

Content:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

DECLARATION i

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ii

ABSTRACT iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS iv

LIST OF SYMBOLS vii

LIST OF TABLES viii

PART A: INTRODUCTION 1

1 Rationale 1

2 Aims of the study 1

3 Scope of the study 2

4 Method of the study 2

5 Structure of the study 2

PART B: DEVELOPMENT 4

CHAPTER 1: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 4

1.1 Sentence and Utterance 4

1.1.1 Sentence 4

1.1.2 Utterance 5

1.1.3 Response as an utterance 6

1.2 Speech Acts 7

1.2.1 Classification of speech acts 7

1.2.2 Response as an act of speech 9

1.3 Prosodic Features 10

1.4 Intonation 10

1.4.1 Definition of intonation 10

1.4.2 Structure of intonation 11

1.4.2.1 The falling tune 13

1.4.2.2 The first rising tune 14

1.4.2.3 The second rising tune 14

1.4.2.4 The falling rising tune 15

1.4.3 Functions of intonation 15

1.4.3.1 The attitudinal function 16

1.4.3.2 The accentual function 16

1.4.3.3 Grammatical function 16

1.4.3.4 The discourse function 17

1.5 Summary 17

CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGY 18

2.1 Context setting 18

2.2 Participants 18

2.3 Data collection 19

2.4 Research questions 19

2.5 Data analysis framework 20

2.6 Summary 20

CHAPTER 3: FINDINGS 21

3.1 Findings 21

3.1.1 Differences in responses between teachers and students 21

3.1.2 Agreeing samples via English and equivalent expressions in Vietnamese 22

3.1.2.1 Teacher towards students 23

3.1.2.2 Students towards teacher 24

3.1.3 Disagreeing samples via English and equivalent expressions in Vietnam 26

3.1.4 The functions of intonation in responses 27

3.1.4.1 Intonation of agreement 28

3.1.4.1.1 The attitudinal function 28

3.1.4.1.2 The accentual function 29

3.1.4.1.3 The discourse function .30

3.1.4.1.4 Grammatical function 31

3.1.4.2 Intonation of disagreement 32

3.1.4.2.1 The attitudinal function 32

3.1.4.2.2 The accentual function 33

3.1.4.2.3 The discourse function 33

3.1.4.2.4 Grammatical function 34

3.2 Summary 34

PART C: CONCLUSION 35

1 Recapitulation 35

2 Limitations and suggestions for further study 36

REFERENCES 37 APPENDIX 1 I

LIST OF SYMBOLS

1 Symbol of stress: '

2 Symbols of intonations

- The glide down:

- The glide up:

- The take - off:

- The Dive:

3 Tonic syllable: Underlined part in an utterance

4 Utterance is pulled:

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page Table 1 Agreeing samples of teachers towards students 23 Table 2 Agreeing samples of students towards teachers 25 Table 3 Disagreeing samples of teachers towards students 27

PART A: INTRODUCTION

In this part, the rationale which explains the reasons for choosing this topic, the aims of the study which illustrates typical goals, the scope of the study which narrows down the research scale and the structure of the study which builds up a frame are established clearly

1 Rationale

Prosody plays an important role in communication Through prosody, people can express their emotion state or sentiment tone People can use prosody to show their attitudes such as happiness, sadness, anger, love or hate However, during communicative process, it is easy to recognize that many speakers cope with problems in using prosody They sometimes do not know exactly how to use prosody in speaking and even in some cases not understand the real meaning of utterances from speakers Consequently, understanding and choosing suitable prosodies will fill in the gaps in communication

Moreover, choosing fitted prosodic features is necessary because this will help speakers in reaching their aims in communication For example, speakers may raise their tone at the end of the utterance in asking instead of using question words as in: ''While the teacher is teaching, students can talk''

One more reason for choosing responses as the topic of the study is that response is

a factor in communication that helps speakers or hearers go on the conversation, depending

on the way they response to the others

We hope that the study not only contributes a small part in the success of each conversation but also can be considered as the ground stage for further researches

2 Aims of the study

Due to the study is limited in the context of classroom in general and prosodic features in responses between the teachers and students in particular as stated in scope of the study, therefore, the goals of the study are as follows:

* To find out the similarities and differences in the responses between teacher and students in context of a class

* To look at the way how teachers and students express their responses showing agreement and disagreement in classroom context

* To find out the prominent intonation strategies preferably used in agreeing and disagreeing responses by teacher and students

3 Scope of the study

The study investigates responses in the level of speech acts There are many kinds

of responses such as responses to a letter, responses to a question, responses to an invitation and so on Nevertheless, this study focuses on responses of teachers and students

in showing agreements and disagreements In addition, the study examines chiefly prosodic features in which intonation in utterances will be paid attention

Moreover, due to the limitation of time, ability as well as knowledge, the research context chosen is in English classes in grade 11 at Ischool Hatinh where the researcher observes and describes mostly the actions and responses between teacher and students

4 Method of the study

The study bases on quantitative research, which is to determine the relationship between one thing and another Quantitative research designs are either descriptive or experimental, which means that we use personal observation and facts to form general rules

The participants of the study include teacher and students at Ischool Hatinh high school

5 Structure of the study

The study is divided into three main parts: Introduction, Development and Conclusion

Part A Introduction:

As many other studies, this part introduces briefly the rationale, aims, the scope, methods and organization of the study

Part B Development

This part includes three chapters:

* Chapter 1: Theoretical background

This is an overview of the related theories It also concerns the previous works and issues on speech acts and prosodic features In each part, there are many sub-terms that explain Speech Acts theory, sentence and utterance, similarities and differences in the

responses between teacher and students, response as an utterance, definition of intonation, structures and functions of intonation

* Chapter 2: Methodology

This chapter introduces quantitative method as the main method for the research In particular, it describes the research questions, participants, data collection and data analysis

framework

* Chapter 3: Findings

This chapter presents findings on intonation in agreeing and disagreeing responses

of teacher and students in class context

Part C Conclusion

The last part will summarize the over all of the study and provide limitation and suggestions for further study

REFERENCES

Vietnamese:

1 Diệp Quang Ban (1996), Ngữ pháp tiếng Việt Tập 2-Nhà xuất bản giáo dục

2 Đỗ Hữu Châu (1995), Giáo trình giản yếu về ngữ dụng học, Nhà xuất bản giáo dục

Huế

3 Đỗ Hữu Châu & Bùi Minh Toàn (1993), Đại cương ngôn ngữ học Tập 2 Nhà xuất bản

giáo dục

4 Nguyễn Hòa (1999), Lực ngôn trung và các kiểu câu, trong những vấn đề ngữ dụng học

kỷ yếu Hội thảo khoa học "ngữ dụng học " lần thứ nhất Hà Nội Nhà xuất bản Khoa

Học Xã Hội Hà Nội

5 Nguyễn Huy Kỷ (2006), Ngữ điệu tiếng Anh ở người Việt Nhà xuất bản Văn hóa thông

tin

6.Nguyễn Quang (2009), Cú điển dụng Anh-Việt Nhà xuất bản Từ điển bách khoa

7 Võ Đại Quang (2009), Một số phương tiện biểu đạt nghĩa tình thái trong tiếng Anh và

tiếng Việt Nhà xuất bản Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội

8 Lê Quang Thêm (2004), Nghiên cứu đối chiếu các ngôn ngữ Nhà xuất bản Đại học

Quốc gia Hà Nội

9 Trần Ngọc Thêm (1997), Cơ sở văn hóa Việt Nam Nhà xuất bản giáo dục

English:

1 Arne Vanvik et al (1979), English Intonation CUP

2 Austin, J L (1962), How to Do Things with Words CUP London-Oxford-New York

3 Backmann, N (1997), Learner Intonation: A pilot study in CA Henning (Ed),

Proceedings the second language research forum

4 Brown, P., Levison, S (1987), Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage CUP

5 Brown, P and Yule, G (1989), Discourse Analysis CUP

6 Checketts, S (1993), Thoughts on Pronunciation New Straits Times,

7 Cook, G (1989), Discourse London: Oxford University Press

8 Crystal, D (1980), A First Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics Boulder, CO: West

view

9 Crystal, D (1991), A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics 3rd edition Cambridge,

MA: Basil Blackwell

10 Ericsson, K & Simon, H (1987), Protocol Analysis Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

11 Fromkin, V and Rodman, R (1998), An Introduction to Language Harcourt Brace

College Publishers

12 Fromkin and Rodman, R (1993), An Introduction to Language New York : Holt,

Rinehart, and Winston

13 Goshgarian, G (1995), Exploring Language London: Oxford University Press

14 Halliday, M A K (1992), Spoken and Written Language London: Edward Amorl

15 Halliday, M A K (1992), Spoken and Witten Language London: Edward Amorl

16 Hartmann, R.R.K., F.C Stork (1972), Dictionary of Language and Linguistics

London: Applied Science

17 Hawkins, P (1984), Introducing Phonology London : Hutchinson

18 Hurford, J R, Heasley B (2003), Semantics a Course Book New edition Cambridge

University Press

19 Jonhson, D M (1987), The Organization of Instruction in Migrant Education:

Assistance for Children and Youth at Risk TESOL Quarterly Chapter 4

Approaches to Research in Second language learning

20 Juliah, M B (1993), Stress and Meaning: Malay UKM Students’ Ability to Apply

English Wrd Stress Academic exercise University Kebangsaan Malaysia

21 Ladefoged, P (1982), A Course in Phonetics San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich

22 Leech, G (1983), Principles of Pragmatics London: Longman

23 Levinson, S (1983), Pragmatics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

24 O'Connor, J D & Arnold (1973), Intonation of Colloquial English London: Longman

25 Phuong, Nguyen Thu (2007), An Investigation into Some Types of Verbal Responses to

Questions in English and Vietnamese Conversion MA thesis Vietnam national

university

26 Quang,Vo Dai & Tam, Ha Cam (2009), English Phonetics and Phonology Hanoi

27 Richards, J C., Platt, J., Platt, H (1992), Dictionary of Language Teaching and

Applied Linguistics (second edition) London: Longman

28 Richards, J C., Platt, J., Platt, H (1985), Dictionary of Language Teaching and

Applied Linguistics London: Longman

29 Richards, J C., Platt, J., Platt, H (1992), Dictionary of Language Teaching and

Applied Linguistics (second edition) London: Longman

30 Roach, P (1988), English Phonetics and Phonology: a Practical-Course (7th Ed.)

Cambridge : Cambridge University Press

31 Searl, J R (1976), Speech Acts Cambridge, England OUP

32 Searle, J R (1976), “Indirect Speech Acts”, in Cole, P and Morgan, J (eds.): Syntax

and Semantics 3: Speech Acts New York: Academic Press

33 Sit, Hoang Van (1980), Tone in Modern Vietnamese MA thesis University of Sydney

34 Tam, Dao Thi (2007), Contrastive Analysis of Intonation in English Yes-No Questions

and Vietnamese Equivalent Expressions MA thesis Vietnam national university

35 Tench, P (1996), The Intonational System of English New York: Wellington House

36 Thomson, D (1996), Second Language Acquisition PPP-ITM : Mass Lecture

37 Wierzbicka, A (1987), English Speech Acts Verbs- A Semantic Dictionary Academic

Press Australia

38 Yule, G (1996), Pragmatics Oxford: Oxford University Press

Websites:

1 http://en.wikipedia.Org/wili/Intonation

2 http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Celik-Intonation.html