Students’ preferences for and Responses to Teacher Written Feedback on Grammatical Errors A case study at Le Quy Don Private Primary School

Students’ preferences for and Responses to Teacher Written Feedback on Grammatical Errors: A case study at Le Quy Don Private Primary School Trần Thị Phương Chi Trường Đại học Ngoại ng

Students’ preferences for and Responses to Teacher Written Feedback on Grammatical Errors: A case study at Le Quy Don Private

Primary School Trần Thị Phương Chi

Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ Luận văn ThS Chuyên ngành: English Teaching Methodology; Mã số: 60 14 10

Người hướng dẫn: Pham Minh Tam, M.Ed

Năm bảo vệ: 2013

Keywords: Tiếng Anh; Phương pháp giảng dạy; Ngữ pháp

Content

Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION

This chapter begins with the presentation of the statement of the problem and rationale for the study Next, it presents the aims and scopes of the study as well as the research questions to which the study seeks to find answers This is followed by a brief description of methodology used in the present study Finally, the chapter concludes with a description of the organization of

the thesis

1.1 Statement of the Problem and Rationale for the Study

Teacher feedback has long been regarded as an essential part in language teaching and learning because it not only helps students to correct their own mistakes but also enhances more confidence about their language competences Feedback may focus on either forms or contents

or both

It was clearly seen that young learners of English as a foreign language often commit grammatical errors in their writing Therefore, teachers’ giving feedback on their errors is

considered to be necessary for students’ proficiency However, the effectiveness of feedback does not lie in itself but by many other factors such as students’ preferences for and responses to the teacher feedback That is the reason why teachers need to take into account some questions:

“What feedback strategies does a teacher actually use when providing feedback on grammatical errors”, “Do students like their teachers’ feedback type?”, “How do they react when receiving feedback?”

Up to now, studies of language education have given considerable attention to the issue

of how to provide feedback on students’ writing (Diab, 2005, Wang, 2010; Katayama; 2007) Yet, the effectiveness of written feedback on grammatical errors has been under-explored (Russel, J.M 2003) Some attention has been given to investigate whether certain types of written feedback may be more effective than the others, but the findings are not inclusive Additionally, which feedback strategies would fit the needs of particular students is still questioned Addressing these issues will require time and commitment of a number of researchers The research being reported in this study contributes to the agenda by investigating the fit between teachers’ practices, students’ preferences and strategies for handling feedback on their written work

Much as important written feedback on grammatical errors is, there have been few studies comprehensively dealing with the issue There is also a lack of consensus over such matters as what feedback strategies is the most effective to correct grammatical errors in particular context, what feedback types are preferred by students and how students respond when they receive teacher feedback Moreover, almost all of the feedback studies on students’ preferences and responses have been conducted in college/ university setting

Owing to the lack of consensus on the effectiveness of teacher feedback, this study aims

to gain more insights into giving effective feedback by asking what students think, want and do after they receive teacher feedback

There is a paucity of research that addresses the elementary context In Vietnam, a focus

on primary school students is important since they are those who have chances to access English

as a foreign language from the very young ages (7-11) This study is an attempt to examine the

real situation of written feedback on grammatical errors conducted at the Le Quy Don Private Primary School and to propose some suggestions for the betterment of the current practice

As most of the past studies have pursued the inquiry of teacher feedback in two general ways, namely students’ preferences for teacher feedback (Hedgcock & Lefkowitz, 1994; Hiroko, 1994; Leiki, 1999) and students’ responses to teacher feedback (Cohen,1987; Ferris, 1995, Chiang, 2004), this study follow the similar traits and attempts to find out how students perceive teacher feedback, what they are concerned about, and what they do after receiving teacher feedback

1.2 Objectives of the Study

This research is conducted for the following purposes:

1 To explore the teachers’ written feedback types in respond to students’ grammatical errors

2 To investigate the students’ preferences towards different types of feedback

3 To find out the students’ strategies for handling feedback after they have received their

written work

1.3 Research Questions

This study is conducted to answer the following research questions:

1 What are the types of teacher written feedback on the students’ grammatical errors?

2 What are the students’ preferences for different types of teacher feedback on grammatical errors?

3 How do students handle the feedback they receive?

1.4 Scope of the Study

This study limits itself to the exploration of the types of written feedback on grammatical errors that were commonly used by the teachers in the study, the students’ preferences for and responses to each feedback type Alternative types such as oral corrective feedback by teachers and peer-to-peer feedback from the students are beyond the scope of this study The impact of teacher feedback on learners’ proficiency is also not the objective of the study

The present research was conducted at a private primary school in Hanoi, with two teachers and two classes of young learners enrolled in Let’s Go 4 course Teachers and students

in classes that are not in primary school system are outside the scope of this study

1.5 Methodology of the Study

This is a case study with the presence of two teachers and two groups of students The teachers were teaching English to fourth-graders at Le Quy Don Private Primary School in Hanoi Data were then analyzed by means of descriptive statistics to identify the patterns of feedback employed by the teachers The students’ preferences were elicited through the questionnaires and students’ responses to teacher feedback on grammatical errors were collected from teacher’s interviews

1.6 Significance of the Study

Providing feedback involves in teachers’ regular practice Feedback, as a means of communication from the teachers, needs the responses from the learners in order to enhance its efficacy Consequently, the link between teachers’ practice of giving feedback, students’ preferences and students’ responses in primary school context are taken into account in this study

Feedback provides students with the information on their performance and learning progress Therefore, it is important to know the feedback types preferred by the young learners in the primary language classroom Additionally, it offers teachers of English a number of pedagogical implications in terms of written grammar correction to the learners in this context Specifically, teachers can be informed about the effects of different feedback patterns, based on which they can choose the ones that suit their students’ preferences and work for the types of feedback that students react positively

1.7 Organization of the Study

The thesis is composed of 5 chapters

Chapter 1 presents the research focus and provides the rationale for it as well as its aims, scopes,

method, research questions and the significance of the study

Chapter 2 reviews the relevant literature, setting the theoretical foundation for the data collection

and analysis

Chapter 3 presents the methodology employed to carry out the present study This includes a

discussion of the participants, the data collection instruments and the procedures for data collection and analysis

Chapter 4 presents the findings of the study with reference to the teacher written feedback

strategies and students’ preferences and response to feedback and also their relationship

Chapter 5 gives a brief summary of the main findings, from which pedagogical implications are

derived This chapter also acknowledges the limitations of the present study and provides suggestions for further studies

REFERENCES

Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D (2005) The effect of different types of corrective

feedback on ESL student writing Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191-205

Bitchener, J., &Knoch, U (2009).The value of a focused approach to written corrective

feedback ELT Journal, 63(3), 204–211

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U (2010).Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers

with written corrective feedback Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207–217

doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002

Brannon, L., & Knoblauch, C H (1982) On students’ rights to their own texts: A model of

teacher response College Composition and Communication, 33(2), 157-166

Brown, H Douglas (2004) Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (fifth edition), 216 -

219

Burt, M K., & Kiparsky, C (1972) The gooficon: A repair manual for English Rowley, MA:

Newbury House

Chandler, J (2003) The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the

accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing Journal of Second Language Writing,

12(3), 267–296

Chaney, S J (1999) The effect of error types on error correction for improvement in the

accuracy of L2 student writing Paper presented at the American

Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, March 11-14, 2000, Vancouver, B C

Cohen, A D & Cavalcanti, M C (1990) Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student

verbal reports In B Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing (pp 155-177) Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press

Condelli, L & Wrigley, H.S (2004) Real world research: Combining qualitative and

quantitative

Creswell, J (1998) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches

(2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage research for adult ESL [Word document] Retrieved from www.leslla.org/files/resources/RealWorldResearch.doc

Diab, R L (2005) Teachers’ and students’ beliefs about responding to ESL writing: A case

study TESL Canada Journal, 23(1), 28–42

Fathman, A K & Whalley, E (1990) Teacher response to student writing: focus on form

versus content In B Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing (pp 178-190) Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press

Ferris, D R (1997) The influence of teacher commentary on student revision TESOL

Quarterly, 31, 315-339

Ferris, D R., Chaney, S J., Komura, K., Roberts, B J., & McKee, S (2000, March)

Perspectives, problems, and practices in treating written error Colloquium presented at TESOL Convention, Vancouver, BC

Ferris, D.R., & Roberts, B (2001) Error feedback in L2 writing classes how explicit does it

need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184

Ferris, D (2003) Response to student writing: implications for second language students

Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum

Ferris, D (2009) Responding to writing In B Kroll, Exploring the Dynamics of Second

Language Writing (p 122) New York City, NY: Cambridge University Press

Ferris, D., Pezone, S., Tade, C., & Tinti, S (1997) Teacher commentary on student writing:

Descriptions and implications Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 155-182

Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J (2009) Teaching ESL composition New York City, NY: Routledge Fraenkel, J R & Wallen, N E (2000) How to design & evaluate research in education (4th

ed.) Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill

Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N (1994) Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to

teacher response in L2 composing Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141–163 Hendrickson, J M (1978) Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory,

research, and practice Modern Language Journal, 62, 387–398

Hong, P C (2003) Investigating teachers’ and secondary students’ preferences towards direct

or indirect feedback on students’ writing: Which way is more helpful [Online]

Available: www.2.ied.edu.hk/mentoring/wals08/download.asp?code=057&ptype

Hyland, F (1998) The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers Journal of

Second Language Writing, 7, 255-286

Hyland, F (2003) Focusing on Form: Student Engagement with Teacher Feedback System,

31(2), 217-230

Lalande, J.F 1982 “Reducing composition errors: An experiment” Modern Language Journal

66 (2): 140-149

Larsen-Freeman, D., M Long, (1991) An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition

Research, Longman

Lee, N., (1990) Notions of “Error” and Appropriate Corrective Treatment, Hong Kong Papers

in Linguistics and Language Teaching 13

Lee, I (1997) ELS learners’ performance in error correction in writing System, 25, 465-477

Lee, I (2003) L2 writing teachers’ perspectives, practices and problems regarding error

feedback Assessing Writing, 8(3), 216–237

Lee, I (2004) Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong

Journal of Second language Writing, 13, 285-312

Leki, I (1991) The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing

classes

Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203–218

Long, M (1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology In K de

Bot, R B Ginsberg, & C Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural

perspective (pp 39– 52) Amsterdam: Benjamins

Lyster, R 1998 “Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse” Studies in

Second Language Acquisition 20(1): 51-81

Matveev, A (2002) The advantages of employing quantitative and qualitative methods in

intercultural research: Practical implications from the study of the perceptions of intercultural communication competence by American and Russian managers Retrieved on March 9, 2009 from http://www.russcomm.ru/eng/rca_biblio/m/matveev01_eng.shtml

Merriam, S (1998) Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education San

Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc Publishers

Nunan, D (1999) Second language teaching and learning Boston: Heinle & Heinle

Publishers

Radecki, P M & Swales, J M (1988) ESL student reaction to written comments on their

written work System, 16(3), 355-365

Raimes, A (1991) Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing TESOL

Quarterly, 25, 407-430

Saiko, H (1994) Teachers Practices and Students’ Preferences for Feedback on Second

Language Writing: A case study of Adult ESL Learners TESL Canada Journal.11(2), 46-70

Sheen, Y (2009) Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the

accurate use of grammatical forms by adult esl learners System: An International

Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 37(4)

Stake, R E (1995) The Art of Case Study Research Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

Van Lier (1988) The classroom and the language learner New York: Longman

Yin, R K (2003) Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA:

Sage

Zamel, V (1985) Responding to student writing TESOL Quarterly, 19, 79–97