RESEARCHES & DISCUSSIONSDEVELOPING THE DIMENSIONS TO MEASURE THE SERVICE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT by Dr.. Unlike other service organizations, pro-fessional service prov
Trang 1"
~~- t~ \ ;; _._ , ~ _ •
VIETNAMESE ACCOUNTING
Trang 2Sep t ember 2010 Number 193
ISSN1859-1116
F s t p b li hed i n 1 99 4
16th year , 20 1
Pub l ished month l y on the 1 st
WWW.tcptkt.ueh.edu.vn
TOPIC VIETNAMESE ACCOUNTING AND INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Ba ck-Fl ush Acco unt ing i n Jus t- in -ti me Bus in es s
Deba t es and Rea lit y o f V i e t nam
Adaptat i on on t he Success of Accounting Pac k a ed So ft w are
Implemen t a t ion
Accou nti ng in V i etnam
Consumer Behavior i n the Soft Dr i nk Ma r ke t in HC M C
Dimensions to Measure the Serv i ce Qual i ty of Cons tr uc ti on Pro j ec t
Management
'0 'ECONOMY& LIFE £;o~:~:
44. News i n B ri ef
Letters and art i cles , ple a se send to
T r an L e Ph u c Th i nh
Economic Development Review
59C Nguy § n E> in h Ch i ~u , D i st ri c t 3 , H oCh i M i nh C ity
Te l : 38295635 - 22413173 - Fax : 8 8 38295635
Ema i : ptk t@U e h edu v n
VND 18 , 000
Trang 3RESEARCHES & DISCUSSIONS
DEVELOPING THE DIMENSIONS TO MEASURE THE SERVICE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT
by Dr HA NAM KHANH GIAO · & NGUY EN £)OAN TRAN G, M BA
services are in the first two categories As a kind
of credence-based services, professional servic s are also intangible, inseparable, variable and per-ishable Unlike other service organizations, pro-fessional service providers have to deal with high level of uncertainty, limited service differentiabil -ity, and difficulties in quality control; have to face some distinctive problems that have not been faced by other types of service organizations such
as client uncertainty, limited service differentia-bility, quality control difficulties, and several
ob-stacles to mounting a successful marketing effort (Kotler et al, 2002) Named as goods of credence,
the professional services attract the buyer by great faith in consultants who sell the servic be -cause services are usually lack many attributes that a buyer can confidently and competently eva
l-uate before, or even after, making a purchase de -cision (Bloom, 1984)
Although the construction industry produces tangible items and has been categorized as a pro-duction instead of service activity, the industry still has some following features that have been characterized for service sector: they cannot be
stored (perishability); i is impossible to sell the expertise inside the landmark once i is commit
-ted or used; the processes of service producton and service consumption are inseparable (insepa -rability); the fact that construction products ca
n-not be standardized makes the nature of
heterogeneity of the industry; the intangible in the construction process can be shown in the p re-liminary design (intangibility)
There are various definitions of proje t ma n-agement provided by Cleland (1990), Kerzner (1992), Turner (1994), and Pinto & Kharbanda (1995) Emphasized on the client satisfaction,
Walker (2002)conceptualized project management
as the planning, control and coordination of a proj-ect from conception to completion on behalf of a
Abstract
In construction industry today, the consultancy
companies need to improve their service quality
-an import-ant part of consultancy service in order
to enhance the customer's loyalty, boosting the
business for future projects and word of mouth
rep-utation The question arises as to whether or not
the dimensions used for measuring the quality of
the generic services can be applied to the profe
s-sional services such as the construction project
management service If yes, how to do so?This
re-search is based on the literature review, especially
Parasuraman et al (1985, 1988), Hoxley (2004),
Murugavarothayan et al (2000) and Ong (2007);
and the qualitative method to suggest possible set
of dimensions to measure the service quality of the
construction project management
1 Basic concepts
A service has been defined by many scholars:
Kotler et al (2002), Gronroos (1979, 2001),
Gummesson (1993), and Lovelock (1991) In a
brief way, Kotler & Amstrong (2001, p 291)
shaped "services are a form of a product that con
-sist of activities, benefits, or satisfactions offered
for sale that are essentially intangible and do not
result in the ownership of anything." Services
have the following four key distinguishing at
trib-utes: Intangibility, Inseparability, Heterogeneity,
and Perishability (Kotler & Bloom, 2002)
Kotler & Keller (2006) classify products/se
r-vices into three categories in the continuum based
on the difficulty of evaluation of products/services
quality: (1) Credence-based qualities: the buyers
find hard to evaluate even after purchase such as
legal service, medical service, and education
serv-ice; (2)Experience-based q alities: the buyers can
evaluate after purchase such as hairdressing,
travel, accommodation, and hotel service; and (3)
Search-based qualities: the buyers can evaluate b
e-fore purchase such as clothing, in which most of
- • International University - Vietnam Nation University HCMC
Economic Development Review - September 2010
Trang 4R ESEARCHES & D ISCUSSI O NS
c. Service qual i ty:
(1985),Zeithaml & Bitner (1996), Harvey (1995),
Lewis & Mitchell, 1990;Dotchin & Oakland, 1994;
2 Dimensions of service quality of the
construc-tion proitlCi management
b U nder s tand i n 12e ssential el e m e n ts for
Trang 5RESE A R C HES & DISCUSSIONS
Table 1:Corespondence between effective elements of project management to original ten dimensio s of
SERVaUAL
III
0
sary in formulating and fa- Q) I - III
cilitating effective project Cl .s III C Q)Q. .: :: I "t : :::I U U C :::I -III
III
Q)
a:
1.Understandingofthe ob
2.Understan ing ofthe pro
tics
3 Management of the project
x risks
4.Selection of a suitable
S.Using of a suitable building
procurement system
6.Use of a suitable
7.Effective organization
structure
8.Having proper and
priate planning
9.Effective monitoringan
controlsystems
1a.Good informatonreco
rd-ing andretrievalsystems x x
11.Abilityto adapt and man
-x age change
12 Good commercial/busi
SERVQUAL model, the framework of service qu
al-ity evaluation proposed by Murugavarothayan et
al (2000) is similar to those ofGronroos's service
quality model (1982, 1990) on the aspect that it
tries to emphasize on what client is left when
service production process has ended
d Mi chael Ho xl e y' s SUR V EYQUAL (2 000 ,
2 00 4):
Hoxley (2000) has discussed the develo ment
of a 26-item scale for assessing servic quality in
a UK construction professional service context
The data collection involves the assessment of244
professionals by their clients The findings of the
research are that construction profes io al servic
q ality can be described as a four-dimensional con-struct (the writer has called the factors "what",
"how", "when" and "who") In 2004, an additional scale item which demonstrates good awareness of
he lth and safety issues was added Thus, it is a
27-item sc le for assessing service quality in the
construction professional service The contents of
criteria are listed on table 2, in which a
SERVQUAL framework is referred and basically
used to construct the SURVEYQUAL measure scale for the construction professional services
e Developing the dimensions to measur e the servi c e quality in construction project management:
Trang 6RESEARCHES & DISCUSSIONS
;
FACTORS
~
ing
x
ca-x
x
,
x XYZ.
Trang 7RESEARCHES & DISCUSSIONS
Employees always courteous
to me
XYZ and its employees have experience relevant to the serv
-x ice I require
Firm gives you individual
tention
Operating hours convenient
to customers
-The partners or d i rectors of XYZ stay involved with my pro]
-x ects.
Employees give you personal
Firm has your best interests
at heart
Employees understand your
specific needs
XYZ and I have similar views about things that are important x
The standard of verbal presentation by e m p l oyees of XYZ is
x
E c n mic Developme nt Review - September 2010
Trang 8RESEARCHES & DISCUSSIONS
Table 3 : Pr , 6posed criteria to measure the service quality of construction project management
1991) (2000)
>
G i
Ul
cu
Ul_
c cu
>-s:
E;
-th e ntic proje ct do c um e nts
=
'0
t
Fo c us o n so l v i n th e p r
ob-cu
If they fa il to do , they do not
0
7 le ' m w i t h n o e x u s e i f f a il
-cu
'0
solve cus t omer
c
>-cu Cooperation and openness Cooperation ad openness
,!!! E
0
'0
>- P r ov i de Serv i ce at Keep promise to do som e- Providing servic e a t
Ul
0
Solutions t o problem C ar ryi ng ou t t as k te c hn i
-t:
Ins i s t on er r or - e Carry out task accu r ate l y ,
0
Ul
Ul
e
Ul=
cu E
t:_
cu •.•
W i ll in gness to re ce i ve
o t:
0
-(1)'0
cu =
a:e
rn
Respond to cus- ' " Always being available
c
Economic Development Review -September 2010
Trang 9RESEARCHES & DISCUSSIO N S
[2J
in-[3J
.,
2
~
:5
Customer feel safe Anticip te future problem and Customer feel safe in
"0
cu ' "
-e cu
:::I ,.,
Em ployee is
cour-., 0
E
2 Effectively coordinate with project par icipators
The ability to do what they say
.
[6J cu
they will do
t:
" 0 Employee has
'" knowledge to
c
swer your question
0
Relevant experienced and
professional knowledge j
c
ere-ativity and cap bility 24 Innovation in methods and approac Clients are treated importantly Having similar view
with Customer
~
25 clients' needs for a project
0
:::I
"
26 Respect the commitment to the proje t and clients
=~ c-C Keep your best in- Keep commitment to project
!:!
" 0
33 Complete buildings are durable and maintainable a
~ 0
:::I "
36 Compromise between quality and cost is achieved
Achieve higher quality than expected [11 J :::I
expected
a
Eu
Notes : the number i n [1comes from the 12 essential elements of effect i ve pro j ect management p r oposed by O n ,
H T (2007)
Economic Development Review - September 2010
Trang 10RE SEARC H ES & D ISCUSS IO NS
The dimensions to me sure the quality of the
project management service in this paper will be
(1985), Murugavarothayan et al (2000), Hoxley
(2004) an On (2007) wih some minor adjust
-ments in order to suit the current construction
en-viro ment specifically Dimensions used for
per the proposed scale of Murugavarothayan et al
(2000) and Hoxley (2 0 ) However, the
ef-fective proje t management proposed b Ong
(2007) There will be 41 su -criteria employed in
he scale with the main contents as shown below:
be based on the original 5 dimensions of
Reliability (6sub-criteria); Responsiveness (4
(7sub-criteria);
sub-criteria);
It is found that there is no conflict among de
-fessio al service quality by Hoxley (2004), Mur
u-gavarothayan et al (2000) and Ong (2007) Since
Parasur~man et al.'s SERVQUAL is widely used
u-gavarothayan's project process and outcome crite
-ria are accepted in UK and Australia; and Ong's
-gap re, Hong Kong and Taiwan A consideration
should be made when constructin a preliminary
framework to the construction industry in general,
qualiy are addressed comprehensively (See table 3)
4 Conclusions
The construction industry is vital for the deve
are massive in size, not only in terms of dollar value but also in terms of number of entities
in-volved Thus, to achieve effective control of a
proj-e t is a real challenge to investors, especially for those who do not come from the industry or have
no experience of building process One of manage-ment solutions that have been widely used to
im-prove efficiency of a proje t is the engagement of
a kind of construction consultancy service: Project Management Consultant (PMC)
In practice, due to the fierce compet ion inthe consultancy service market nowadays, i is evident that more and more consulancy service organiza-tions are showing greater concern to the quality
of service The higher the quality of service, the higher customer satisfaction; this is supported by Wilkie's (1990) concern of quality as a fundamen- tal element to achieve customer satisfactio , and
profes-sional service
This paper checked through the literatures, es-pecially Parasuraman et al (1985, 1988), Hoxley
pos-sible set of nine dimensions, including 4 sub-cri-teria, to measure the service quality of the construction project management Obvio sly,
these dimensions needed to be checked in the other quantitative research studies to asses how far they can be applied to the whole constructio project management servic a
References
1 Asubonteng,P K J McCleary& J Swan(1 9 96 )
Quality".Journa l of Se r vices Ma r keting , Vol 10(6),pp
6 2- 8
2 Berry, L.L A Parasuraman & V.A.Zeithaml
( 1 98 5) , "Qual ycounts in Services too".Business Hor i
-zo n s
Ser vi ce Qualit y, November,Vol.2 ( 1 ) pp.31-3 3
4.Buzzell,R.D.&B.T.Gale(1987) , T e P IM S Princ i
-p le s , Linking Str a teg y t o P e o r manc e The Free Press
Economic Development Review - September 2010
Trang 11RESEARCHES & DISCUSSIONS
Design and lmotementetion Blue Ridge Summit, PA : TAB
Books Inc , pp 299-322
6 Dotchin , J.A & J S Oakland (1994) , " Total
Quality Management in Services Part 3 : Distinguishing
Percept i ons of Service ' Quality", International Journal of
Quality and Reliability Management , Vol 11 (4) , pp 6
-28
7 Gale, T B (1990) , " The Role of Marketing in
Tota l Qua li ty Management " in QUIS-2 Quality Services
Conference Proceedings, Un i versity of St John's
Market i ng : A Customer Relationship Management
Ap-proach , (2nd ed ) Cbs Publi s hers & Distributors
9 Groonroos , C (1979) , " Service-oriented
Inter-national Market i ng Strategies: An Overview" , Working
Adm i nistration ; No 16
Service Organization ISQA , New York
11 Hoxley , M (2004) , "Are Competitive Fee
Mutually Exclusive? ", Construction Management & Eco
-nomics , Vol 10, pp 599-605
12 Juran , J M (1988) Juran on Planning for Quality
13 Kotler , P & A Amstrong (2001) , Principles of
Marketing , (9th ed.) P r ent i ce Hall International Inc
14 Kotler , P & K.L Keller (20 0 6) , Marketing Man
-agement (6th ed ) , Pearson Int e rnational Ed iti o P
15 Kotler , P T Hayes & N.P Bloom (2002),
Mar-keting Professional Service , NJ : Prenti c e-H a ll , 2002
16 Kotler , P & P N Bloom (1984), Marketing
Pro-fess i onal Services , Pr e ntice-Hall
17 Kotler , P (2003) , Marketing Insights from A to Z :
80 Concepts every Manage r s Nee d s to Know Wiley
18 Lewis , B R & V.W Mitchell (1990) , "Defining
and Measur i ng the Quality o f Customer Service " , Mark e
ing Intelligence & Planning , Vol 8 , No.6 , pp 11-17
19 Lewis , B.R (1993) , "Qua l ity in the Service
Sec-tor : A Review ", International Journal of Banking and
Man-agement , Vol 7 , No 5 , pp 4-12
20 Lovelock , C (1991) , Se r vices Marketing,
Pren-t ce-Hail, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
21 Murugavarothayan (a k.a Ken Morgan) , J R &
Ec ono mi c Deve l opmen t Rev i ew - Septembe r 2010
M C Partners ( 20 0 ) , " P e rtorrnance Indicators of Profes-sional S ervices Used b y Clients " , The Construction and Bui l ding Research Conference of the Royal Inst i tut i on of
Uni-versity of Greenwich
2 Ong , H T (20 0 7) , Conference Paper at the in-augural C o nstruct io n Conference 2007 jointly organized
by CIOB Singap o re and National University of Singapore
23 Parasuraman , A , V.A Zeithml & L L Berry (1985) , " A Conceptual M o del of Serv i ce Qual i ty and i ts Implication " , Journal of Marketing , Vol 49 , Fall , pp 41-45
24 P a rasuraman , A , V A Zeithml & L L Berry (1988) , " S RVQU A L : A Multi-Item Scale for Measuring Cust o mer P erception s of Service Quality " , Report No
86 - 108 M a rketing S cience Institute , Cambridge , MA
25 P e ter s , T J & N Austin (1985) , A Pass i on for Excellence New York : Random House , Inc
26 Pinto , J K & O P Kharbanda (1995 ), Successful Project Manag e rs, Van Nostrand Re i nhold , NY
27 Rudie , M.J & B H Wans l ey (1984 ) , Services Marketing in a Changing Env i ronment , The Merr i ll Ly n ch
28 Schneider , B , & D.E Bowen (1995) , Winning the Service Game , Boston , MA : Harvard Bus i ness School Press
Con-struction O xf o rd , Blackwel l Science Ltd
3 Wilkie , W L (1990) , Consumer Behavior , ( 2nd
ed ), N e w York : Wiley
31 Win s ni e wski , M & M Donnelly (1996 ) , " Measur-ing Servi c e Q u lity in the Public Sector: The Potentia l for SERVQUAL " , Total Quality Management , Vol 7 ( 4 )
32 Z eithaml , V A (2000) , " Service Quality , Prof-itability , an d the E c o o mic Worth of Customers : What We Know a nd Wh a t We N e ed to Know ", Journal of the Acad
-emy o f Marketing Science , Vol 28 , pp 67-85
33 Z ithaml, V A L L Berry & A Parasuraman (19 88 ) , "C o mmunication and Control Process in the De-livery of Se rvice Quality " , Journal of Marketing , Vol 52 ,
pp.39-48