1. Trang chủ
  2. » Kỹ Thuật - Công Nghệ

KẾT CẤU MỚI PRINCIPLES OF CONSTRUCTION FOR WIDESPAN STRUCTURES FROM THE MILLENNIUM DOME

10 270 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 10
Dung lượng 2,15 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

OUTLINE OF THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEME Each of the 12 masts and the pyramids that support them were assembled and fully site welded in an area adjacent to the permanent site. The pyramids were carried to the site and were placed on the concrete piled foundations with a crawler crane. The masts were also carried with the same crane and laid out adjacent to their final position. Whilst there, they were fitted out with the temporary erection gear that was subsequently used for the cable pulling and also had the restraint cables attached, before being lifted into position with a large 1000 tonne capacity strut jib crane. W M R A Hi it Fig 1 A 90 metere mast is reared up prior to being placed on the pyramid The masts were guyed off with four restraining cables before the crane was released. The front two of the cables were temporary but for the rear two, the permanent backstay cables, which ran directly to ground anchors could be utilised. In order to restrict the movement of the masthead under wind loads the four restraining cables were post tensioned to a predetermined force in the order of 200KN before the crane was released. This operation was further complicated by the fact that the mast head position in space was monitored and was required to be within 150mm of theoretical when the stressing was completed. The mast was mounted on a rubber bearing located on top of the pyramid which allowed this small amount of rotational movement.

Trang 1

PRINCIPLES OF CONSTRUCTION FOR WIDE-SPAN

STRUCTURES WITH EXAMPLES FROM THE MILLENNIUM DOME

Peter W Miller Watson Steel Limited

S Y N O P O S I S

There are a number of key issues that need to be

considered in planning the construction of any

complicated structure and the Millennium Dome was no

different

This paper gives a brief description of the construction

method adapted for the Dome and then describes the

major issues that had to be dealt with in the planning and

construction of the Structural steelwork and cable net

that forms the structural framework for the Dome An

explanation of the thought processes leading to the

eventual construction scheme is given and it will be

shown that many of the principles described here also

apply to any wide-span structure

I N T R O D U C T I O N

In late 1996 Watson Steel were invited to submit a tender

for the supply and construction of the steel and cable

frame for the Millennium Dome In order to begin to

estimate the construction costs of such an unusual and

large-scale structure a workable and economic

construction scheme had to be developed The

construction scheme produced at that time, whilst just a

series outline sketches, was fundamentally the same as

that which was eventually used A great amount of

detailed development post contract award took place

however and some of the attention to detail that was

required will be demonstrated in the following pages

O U T L I N E O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N

S C H E M E

Each of the 12 masts and the pyramids that support them

were assembled and fully site welded in an area adjacent

to the permanent site

The pyramids were carried to the site and were placed on

the concrete piled foundations with a crawler crane

The masts were also carried with the same crane and laid

out adjacent to their final position Whilst there, they

were fitted out with the temporary erection gear that was

subsequently used for the cable pulling and also had the

restraint cables attached, before being lifted into position

with a large 1000 tonne capacity strut jib crane

Hi

it

Fig 1 A 90 metere mast is reared up prior to being placed

on the pyramid The masts were guyed off with four restraining cables before the crane was released The front two of the cables were temporary but for the rear two, the permanent back­ stay cables, which ran directly to ground anchors could

be utilised In order to restrict the movement of the masthead under wind loads the four restraining cables were post tensioned to a predetermined force in the order

of 200KN before the crane was released This operation was further complicated by the fact that the mast head position in space was monitored and was required to be within 150mm of theoretical when the stressing was completed The mast was mounted on a rubber bearing located on top of the pyramid which allowed this small amount of rotational movement

Trang 2

Fig 2 These three sketches show the rearing

procedure for the masts

The cable net, which consisted of over 2600 cables was

assembled and lifted in four main sections Each section

formed a large concentric circle which when pulled

simultaneously at 36 positions was elevated to its final

height The missing infill cables between the circular

sections were installed individually using a combination of

abseiling techniques for the higher locations and powered

access equipment where practical

Fig 3 The second cable net being reared up

When all cables had been installed they were tensioned

to their final design stress by progressively jacking at the anchor points of the 72 pairs of radial cables The stressing operation was carried out in a balanced manner around the dome in three stages

The erection of the masts commenced on 15t h October

1997 and the stressing was completed by the end of March 1998 A period of only 16 working weeks

P L A N N I N G

The key to all successful site construction projects is detailed planning and the more complicated the project the more important detailed planning becomes Inevitably wide-span projects tend to be unique and challenging where the need for lateral thinking combined with attention to detail becomes even more important

On the Dome an internal system for planning and developing the construction method was established within Watson's that proved to work very well This was based on regular brainstorming sessions where the most experienced and practical engineers within our business with both fabrication and erection experience debated specific topics and put all the ideas on the table The project team would go away and examine all the options and develop the ideas The project team would then present their conclusions back to the gathered engineers for critique Meetings were held weekly at the outset of the project when the construction scheme was formed and thereafter as and when required

When the options had been narrowed down to a few options they would all be costed out to determine which was the most economic

Fig 4 A full scale trial was carried out on the first mast section to 'prove' the planned net pulling method

Trang 3

Quite often practical trials were required to determine the

best options When the stage had been reached where the

scheme was finalised on paper it was decided to carry out

a full-scale trial This was carried out in the Bolton

factory using the first of the mast head sections that was

fabricated in July 1997 This trial proved to be a good

investment

The outcome of this planning / development stage was a

detailed method statement which was developed

gradually over several months

P R E - A S S E M B L Y

For any construction scheme to be successful it must be:

-a) Safe

b) Economic

c) Fit within programme constraints

d) Comply with specification

One method commonly employed to ensure that these

criteria are met is to pre-assemble as much of the structure at

ground level as possible

In the case of the Dome this principle was applied to the

pyramids, the main masts and to the erection of the cable net

that forms the structural framework of the Dome and

supports the fabric covering The final decision on which

elements and to what extent they should be pre-assembled

depends on many factors including cost, availability of large

cranes, programme, height above ground, and the alternative

safe means of man access In the following paragraphs the

decisions that were taken on the pre-assembly of the

principle elements of the Dome are described

P R E - A S S E M B L Y O F P Y R A M I D S

The four-legged pyramids that support the 12 masts are over

8 metres wide and 10 metres high and therefore had to be

constructed on site The design forces and architectural

requirements meant that site welding of the node joints was

the only feasible option The overall construction

programme however could not be achieved if the

construction of the pyramids was delayed until the

permanent foundations were available The solution was to

pre-assembly the pyramids on a temporary foundation in a

separate area away from the main construction zone The

completed pyramids were then stored and eventually carried

to their permanent location, using a large crane, once the

foundations were released

The advantage of pre-assembling all the twelve pyramids in

a specific assembly area was that once the assembly jig was

set up and checked it could be used twelve times and all the

pyramids were sure to be identical and therefore

interchangeable The fact that a large crawler crane in excess

of 200 tonnes nominal capacity was required was not a

disadvantage because the crane was planned to be on site

anyway throughout the period to assemble the mast sections

Fig 5 One of the completed pyramids being placed

on to the foundations

P R E - A S S E M B L Y O F M A S T S

It was a fairly obvious solution to build the main 90 metre masts on the ground and to lift them with a large crane The original cross sectional diameter of the masts however was greater than we could transport on the public roads by conventional trailers This would mean that there were either very expensive transport costs or else only half the mast cross section was fabricated in the factory and the remaining fabrication completed on site Both options were considered undesirable and following discussions with the Engineers it was agreed that the overall diameter of the masts could be reduced in size and the design compensated by increasing the wall thickness of the eight tubes that made up the octagonal cross section of the mast

Fig 6 May 1997 A completed mast section-.ready for dispatch to the painters

Trang 4

This small structural change had a significant effect on the

costs since it was now possible to fabricate the masts almost

entirely within the factory leaving just five joints along the

length to be completed on site in the pre-assembly yard

Fig 7 A Fully painted section arrives in the site assembly area

As in the case of the pyramids described in the previous

paragraph, the decision was taken to pre-assemble the masts

away from their permanent location This was due to the fact

that the foundation works for the masts had to be carried out

in parallel with the mast build because of the overall

programme constraints The moving of the completed

masts, however, which were 90 metres long and weighed 95

tonnes, was a much more difficult problem Various options

were considered and evaluated These included using special

multi-axial transporters, using a bogey system on a track etc

The solution which was eventually selected was to pick and

carry the masts with the large 200 tonne capacity crawler

crane This was only possible if a flat and well-compacted

route could be provided and a great deal of investigation was

carried out to select and subsequently prove the route This

exercise was further complicated because of limitations to

the ground loading pressure that could be applied in the

region around the Blackwall tunnel that crossed the site

Fig 8 A full mast being carried from the assembly area on

to the site

P R E - A S S E M B L Y O F C A B L E N E T S

There are over 2600 separate cables that form the ' w e b '

structure of the dome This presented, perhaps, the

biggest challenge to the Watson Steel construction team

The initial objective in developing the scheme for the installation of the cables was to assemble the complete net at ground level and lift it in to position in one operation This would have the massive advantage of removing almost all the risk of the high level work It is also many times faster to install a cable in to a net at ground level under zero load, than

it is to install it into a existing framework of cables at high level

This initial objective however was found to be impracticable and over ambitious due to the weight, and the many complications, technical difficulties and costs that it introduced

It was next considered splitting the net into two sections and lifting these individually and just mstalling the 72 radial cables between them at high level Again it was found that the technical issues were too difficult and so the next preferred option of three sections was investigated This iterative process was continued until, after much debate, the eventual decision was to opt for the pre-assembly of four separate rings and to complete the infill between these rings

by lifting one cable at a time at high level

This sort of compromise is necessary and indeed often essential, when developing any complicated erection method Having to satisfy Safety, programme, and budget considerations inevitably involves compromise

It was possible using this chosen method to assemble over 75% of the cables at ground level under a zero load condition The difference in terms of man-hours between a cable laid out on the ground and one installed at high level is estimated to be at least six-fold The saving in terms of cost and time of maximising the pre-assembly of a cable structure

is therefore enormous

The following figures 9,10,11 show the lifting arrangement for the first two nets This was complicated because the temporary restraint cables for the masts passed over the top

of the second net where it was pre-assembled on the ground The temporary restraint to the masts therefore had to be re-diverted via the previously erected central cable truss, once the initial central net was lifted

Masts restrained b y t e m p o r a r y forestays with first c a b l e ring r e a d y for lifting

Fig 9

Trang 5

163

S I T E W E L D I N G

N I E R N N

W O R M N G

M M I f W JMPowWl :

\ / I B * O M W \ /\ gwyj | |

' 1 H Q W '

Central ring lifted - mast restraint

transferred to new tie downs

Figure 10

Temporary forestays removed masts now

restrained by tie downs to central ring

Fig 11

The handling of cables is a key issue that needs careful

consideration It is very easy to cause accidental damage

during laying out and handling that may necessitate

having to replace the cable The sequence of the

assembly operation has to be planned in-depth to ensure

that access routes are maintained and that the site

equipment that is being used to handle the cables does

not have to run over previously laid cables The cables

used on the Dome were of the spiral strand type, which

are highly susceptible to damage caused by kinking or

squashing And any cables that showed signs of

distortion had to be replaced

On the Dome, a method for laying out the cables using a

forklift truck and a turntable on a flat wagon was

developed The cables were delivered in coils of a

standard inside diameter The coils were placed on a

turntable on the back of a small flat bed wagon The

loose end of the cable was restrained using the fork lift

truck while the wagon drove slowly away allowing the

cable to unwind on to ground in a predetermined

position Some of the larger cables which ranged up to

90mm diameter also required auxiliary craneage to assist

in the laying out

Many engineers tend to avoid site welding wherever possible This may be due to preconceptions about quality, time or cost In reality site welding can often be more economic and can provide a better engineering solution than bolting The difficulty however is that there

is no golden rule and the only way to determine which is actually the 'best' method for a particular application is

to carry out a detailed comparison on a job by job basis

On the Dome, for example, the original specification was for the mast joints to be site bolted using a pipe flange detail as it was considered to be the more economic solution The architect however preferred a smooth site welded detail and so an option was included within the tender for the contractor to specify the 'extra-over' costs

he would require to site weld, grind and paint the 480 joints in-lieu of bolting When the actual cost of the options was calculated cost it was cheaper to give the architect and engineer what they preferred and to site weld the complete mast! A good example of a win-win solution!

Fig 12 One of the 480 mast joints being welded on site using a flux cored wire process

The reason why site welding is sometimes cheaper is because it can dramatically simplify the shop fabrication element of the works If the site operation is considered

in isolation then welding will always be more expensive than bolting but when the savings in fabrication and bolts are taken into account the cost advantage often swings the other way There are other aspects to consider as well The site programme will often be extended if welding is involved but in the case of the Dome this was not critical because the welding was taken off the critical path by

Trang 6

pre-assembling the masts away from the main site area in

parallel with the foundation works Another factor is the

corrosion protection to the welded areas which has to be

applied in site conditions and can also effect the cost and

programme equation

Fig 13 The semi-automatic welding equipment used on site

For most site welding applications the preferred process is to

use a flux cored wire with a semi-automatic hand held gun

This system is quite robust, can withstand a reasonable

amount of draught and has a much higher deposition rate

than conventional MMA welding

One of the major advantages that the wire feed processes has

is that they do not require the baking and control systems that

the MMA electrodes require The working areas are also a lot

cleaner and there is less waste because there are no leftover

electrode ends

If site welding is to be considered then it must be well

organised with a professional set-up There is a significant

cost to estabUshing a well-controlled site environment and

usually there is a minimum scope of work below which it is

not usually economic to introduce site welding Conversely,

however, once the decision to site weld has been taken, there

are often many other opportunities which present themselves

and site welding becomes the preferred solution for that site

The important thing to remember is that there is nothing to

be fearful of by introducing site welding Provided that it is

well organised and controlled it can be a major benefit to the

project

T E M P O R A R Y E R C T I O N G E A R

One of the common elements with wide span structures is

that they usually involve complicated and unique erection

methods Where cables are involved the erection method

also usually demands special equipment for lifting, jacking,

pulling etc There can be a substantial investment required in

such equipment before the construction can commence, in

the case of the Dome this was in the order of £0.5m

The major fabricators experienced in such operations often

have large stockpiles of specialist equipment that can be

adapted for future schemes

J A C K S

The attached sketch shows the arrangement of the pulling equipment that was developed for lifting the nets on the Dome Most of the equipment was designed specifically for this purpose

Fig 14 Original Sketch of the proposed arrangement for pulling

up the cables

Each mast was equipped with three pull jacks The jacks were each capable of pulling a six tonne force The pulling wires were then double reeved which increased the pulling force provided by each jack to almost 12 tonne force A pull test carried out in site conditions found that the theoretical 12 tonne force at the clamp position had been reduced to 10.5 tonnes due the friction loss in the system The friction loss is

a significant factor that should be allowed for in the design

of any lifting arrangement such as the one developed for the Dome The friction loss would normally vary between 5-20% however it can be reduced by using special low friction bearings and divertors but this also adds significantly to the cost of the system The actual design therefore is a trade off between the capacity of the jacks used and the sophistication

of the equipment On the Dome it was found that the most economic solution was to provide enough jacks so that there was plenty of spare capacity and hence the relatively high friction loss did not cause concern

In total 36 jacks were used which generated a combined pulling force at the clamps of 375 tonnes

Trang 7

T E M P O R A R Y C L A M P S

The design of the clamps, which attached to the ends of

the permanent cables in order to transfer the pulling

force, was an important issue on the Dome It was

expected at the outset of the contract that propriety

clamps would be available for each of the 3 different

diameters that required pulling

It was found however, that due to the necessary

restrictions on the local stresses that could be applied to

the spiral strand cables it was not possible to locate

clamps 'off the shelf It was necessary therefore to

design and fabricate purpose made clamps The design

was based on limiting the compressive stress to 28

n/mm2 which lead to the clamping length of 500 mm

Fig 15 The purpose made clamps used to pick up the permanent cables

without damage

The clamps also required a lining material to enhance the

friction capacity Various pull tests were carried out during

the design period to determine an appropriate lining material

Initially a rubber-based material was used which was found

to generate the required friction during the trials During the

first net lift carried out under site conditions however, It was

found that the clamps tended to slip in certain circumstances

The subsequent investigation resulted in the conclusion that

the friction properties of the rubber material had altered since

the initial tests This was due to the fact that the test was

carried out in dry warm conditions and the actual conditions

in the middle of winter on site were very different The

problem was resolved by changing the lining material to a

type similar to that used in the manufacture of car brake

linings Once the linings had been changed no further

problems were experienced

Fig 16 The clamps in action at the start of a lifting operation

S T R E S S I N G O F T H E C A B L E S

The final stressing of the cables was carried out at the 72 perimeter adjustment points Each pair of radial cables incorporated a pair of turnbuckles that were used to take

up the adjustment The cable attachment points were detailed to accommodate a 50 tonne capacity pull jack A hydraulic pump that had an accurate oil pressure gauge operated the pull jack The force that was being introduced into the cable was calculated from a calibrated chart based on the hydraulic pressure reading

Fig 17 Arrangement of the stressing equipment

Trang 8

E X A M P L E S O F O T H E R S T E E L W O R K

S T R U C T U R E S O N W H I C H S I M I L A R

C O N S T R U C T I O N P R I N C I P L E S W E R E

A D A P T E D

T G V I N T E R C H A N G E , C H A R L E S D E G A U L L E

A I R P O R T , PARIS

Site welding was chosen as the preferred method for

constructing the trusses primarily for aesthetic reasons but

also because of the difficulty achieving the required force

transfer between the members The 50 metre span trusses

were pre assembled in an assembly yard some 200 metres

away from the construction area and transported by tractor &

trailer

The unusual features on this completed structure are the

inverted bowstring trusses, which are post tensioned by

pulling down the perimeter cable ties

Client Aeroports de Paris

Architect Aeroports de Paris

Consulting Engineer R.F.R Partnership, Paris

Fig 18 One of the Bow string trusses being assembled in the factory

It was subsequently dismantled for transport to France

R E E B O K STADIUM, BOLTON The steel roof trusses were pre-assembled by site welding in to sections up to 20 metres x 20 metres The pre-assembly sizes were determined by the size of the available lifting crane The trusses were then joined together by insitu welding at heights of up to 50 metres The complete suspended roof was erected on a series of

72 temporary props The roof trusses were supported from the propped rafters until all the welding was completed The props were then struck and the trusses allowed to span the full length of 150 metres Tie rods from the truss support the front edges of the rafters, which in turn provide lateral support to the top boom of the truss in certain circumstances

Client Bolton Wanderer E C Architect Lobb Partnership Steel Designer Watson Steel

Fig 20 View of the south stand under construction Note the temporary props to the rafters and the roof truss sections being prepared for site welding

Fig 21 View on the completed stadium

Trang 9

HULME ARCH ROAD BRIDGE, MANCHESTER

The 52 metre span bridge was constructed on a series of

temporary trestles The deck sections were

pre-assembled on the adjacent ground and site welded in

sections up to 18 metres square The arch sections were

also partially pre-assembled and the remaining joints in

the 28 metre high arch were welded insitu and ground

smooth afterwards

The cables were installed individually once the welding

had been completed and the props removed from the

arch The cables were then tensioned by jacking before

the remaining temporary trestles were removed from

under the deck

Client Manchester City Council

Architect Chris Wilkinson Architects

Engineer Ove Arup & Partners

Fig 22 The bridge was erected over the busy dual carriageway

during a series of road closures

CHEK LAP KOK AIRPORT, HONG KONG

The 490,000 square metre roof structure was pre-assembled as 129 large panels up to 36m * 36m square Each roof panel was fully site welded and painted and then carried over one kilometre to the final location before being lifted and slid in to position

The overall construction programme could only be achieved by pre-assembling the roof in parallel with the concrete substructure

Massive amounts of temporary works were required to assemble, transport and place the roof panels into position

Client Hong Kong Airport Authority Architect Sir Norman Foster & Partners Consulting Engineer Ove Arup & Partners

Fig 24 The first fully welded roof panel in position

Fig 25 Aerial view during construction The separate modules have yet to be joined together by site welding

Fig 23 Note the continuously changing cross section of the plated

box section

Trang 10

THE GREAT GLASSHOUSE, LLANARTHNE,

CARMARTHENSHIRE

The steel and glass roof has a total area of 4300 square

metres The geometry of the complex, doubly curved

roof structure is part of a torus The roof was constructed

insitu on temporary trestles by site welding The curved

tubular ribs span up to 55 metres The site joints were full

strength butt welds and were ground smooth

Client National Botanic Garden of

Wales Architect Sir Norman Foster & Partners

Consulting Engineer Anthony Hunt Associates

Fig 26 The tubular curved arches were site welded insitu

Fig 27 The completed Glass house inclined to face the south

S U M M A R Y

On Wide-span and complicated structures each and every erection scheme will have different priorities and different conditions which have to be taken into account The one common and essential factor however is detailed planning and attention to detail

Also the principles outlined in this paper with regard to pre-assembly, welding, temporary equipment etc can be applied to most structures and will be equally valid

A C K N O W L E D G E M A N T S

Client The New Millennium Experience Ltd Architects Richard Rogers Architects Ltd Engineers Buro Happold

Construction Managers McAlpine / Laing J.V

Ngày đăng: 09/06/2015, 17:23

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm