MAKE Camden Lock Village canal building Stage C report 25 Oct 2006

This design for Camden Lock Village Phase 1 comprises a major new building along the Regents Canal at Chalk Farm Road: The canal building. This building comprises a new, 21st century re imagining of the street and canal levels, together with apartments on the upper levels

Camden Lock Village Canal Building

Stage C report

25 October 2006

Camden Lock Village - Canal Building

25 October 2006

Dear David and Piers,

We are delighted to present our stage C report for the Camden Lock Village Canal Building The illustrated scheme has been developed and co-ordinated with your other appointed design team, together with yourselves, and represents what was shown to Camden earlier this month We believe the design is in a robust condition to move forward to the next stages

This design for Camden Lock Village Phase 1

comprises a major new building along the Regent’s Canal at Chalk Farm Road: The Canal Building

This building comprises a new, 21st century

re-imagining of the existing successful markets at

the street and canal levels, together with

apartments on the upper levels.

The building opens up the currently impenetrable site Public routes and spaces alongside the canal are created, together with a new route adjacent to the railway arches, which are themselves re-

modelled and restored.

Public terraces at the intermediate levels offer

new access for dining and relaxation These are

linked via a grand public ramp, enabling all the

floors to be reached seamlessly.

This design offers an exciting and important new development in the regeneration of Camden.

Site location within Camden Town Centre 10

The site: relationship to the town centre 12

Development within Regent’s Canal conservation area 16

Optimization of areas: June to September 2006 40

Chalk Farm Road public roof terrace 84

01

Brief History of the site

This is a triangular site, bounded on the northwest by the

railway, to the southwest by Chalk Farm Road and to the

south by the Canal.

There are currently nine buildings along the Chalk Farm Road

boundary, numbers 1- 9 Number 7-8 is a public house

currently called the Camden Rock Café, but previously, and

for the majority of its life, known as the Carnarvon Castle

This row of properties was previously known as Frances

Terrace, and the map regression suggests that they were

built in 1841 The road was renamed and renumbered in 1863,

with no 2 Frances Terrace becoming 7-8 Chalk Farm Road.

The 1870-3 OS map indicates the presence of a pub on this

site and the rate books and census returns for the 1860s

indicate that this was called the Pickford Arms By 1874 it had

changed its name to the Carnarvon Castle and drainage

records dated 1874 from LB Camden suggest that this was a

new building by an unnamed architect on the same site

Drainage records for the remaining terrace of houses to the

right of the Carnarvon Castle indicate that these have been

extensively rebuilt and that substantial alterations have

been made to plan form, use and finishes.

The only other building(s) on the site is a clearly marked canal

facility which existed as early as 1834, and can clearly be seen

in the very centre of the study area in each of the maps, until

the present-day OS map 2006 Aerial photography shows the

site at present to be a car park and there appears to be no

standing remains of this element of the site’s history.

1870-73 OS Map, showing the existence of the buildings on Chalk Farm Road (including the Carnarvon Castle Pub) The red line indicates part of the Phase 1 proposed development

1834 Parish Map of St Pancras - area near canal has not been developed

Site history

Kentish Town

Chalk Farm Road

Camden High Street

Mornington Crescent

Kentish Town

Hampstead / the North

Chalk Farm Road Kentish

Camden High Street

West End

The site: relationship to the town centre

The site is located at the heart of the existing markets and borders on the North edge of Camden’s shopping centre.

Therefore it is important that the design does not destroy the character

of the markets, but fosters them and celebrates its unique characteristics.

The site is easily accessible by public transport.

10 11

14

13

12 15

16

17 18

1 Residential Development

2 The Roundhouse

3 Stables Market, Buildings A & B

4 Henson’s Mixed Use Scheme

5 Camden Lock Middle Market

6 35 Oval Road

Completed developmentCurrently being implementedPotential development site

17 Stables Market, Building C

18 Stables Market, Building D

Within the conservation area some of the old industrial sites have become available for development:

the completed sites are shown in green, those currently being implemented in magenta and potential sites are shown in yellow.

to King’s Cross

Improvements to Silver Link Line

- doubling capacity

Metropolitan Walks and green chain

Camden Road Station

Cross river tram terminus

NORTH LITTLE VENICE

hampstead road lock

Camden Town

Angel

city road lock

city road basin

wenlock basin REGENT’S PARK

bottle bridge tunnel cumberland arm

maida hill tunnel

RIVER THAMES

DLR

kentish town lock hawley lock

saint pancras basin saint pancras lock

kingsland basin

islington tunnel

limehouse tide lock commercial road lock salmon’s lane lock johnson’s lock

limehouse basin

sturt’s lock

old ford lock

mile end lock VICTORIA PARK

PADDINGTON BASIN

acton’s lock

The Regent’s Canal

Camden Road Station is within a 5

minute walk from the site

Improvements to the Silver Link Line

will double its capacity.

With the Metropolitan Walk running

along the canal there lies a great

opportunity in developing the site as

part of the green chain.

Links to public transport

Camden LockMiddle Market Chalk

Farm Road

Kentish

Town Road

Stables Market

Clarence Way Estate

Hawle

y Road Playground

and Community Centre

Phase 1Phase 2

The site and its environs

Shown in red is the boundary of Phase 1, comprising of the Torbay street development to the North of the railway arches and the Canal building along the Regent’s Canal.

The Regent’s Canal conservation area

Development within the Regent’s Canal conservation area

Suffolk Wharf & 32-36 Jamestown Rd Gilbeys Warehouse

Camden Lock Middle Market Gilbeys Warehouse

Low density underdeveloped site

The site is currently underdeveloped

because of its historical use The

primary activity is the Canal market as

well as the shops within the Victorian

terraces along Chalk Farm Road

Currently the potential of the site is

restricted due to the lack of access and

routes into the site.

Currently no public access to the canal

is provided from Chalk Farm Road.

The market is accessed through a steeply sloping claustrophobic tunnel.

The original facade of the terrace is affected by a significant amount of additions.

Chalk Farm Road frontage

There is no direct access from Chalk Farm Road down to

the canal side.

An iron fence separates the Canal market from the

quayside As a result the canal side is deserted in sharp

contrast to Camden Lock Middle Market, just the other

side of Chalk Farm Road.

•

•

Visualisation of arches adjacent to buildings A + B

Currently the railway arches to the North of the site are largely hidden and their potential unfulfilled.

no access to and no relationship with canal

C

halk F

armo ad

Canal sit e

animated, strong relationship with canal

Within Camden’s UDP the scheme

responds to the Regent’s Canal area

of special character, the conservation

area.

The Parliament Hill - Palace of

Westminster view cone wider context

clips the western edges of the site

Camden’s UDP has designated the site

for mixed use residential and retail

development.

Key UDP designations

wider context

02

Maximise views outwards to the surroundings.

by the canal.

• Increase permeability across the site, create new public routes

•

MTV studios

Ambitions

to Camden Rd Station

Link to Metropolitan Walk

The masterplan generates clearly definable plots and creates a network

of public routes through the site extending westwards towards Stables Market, eastwards towards Camden Road station and northwards towards a re-modelled Hawley Road garden and the established Metropolitan Walk.

On the Canal Market site a new building fronts the canal and Chalk Farm Road

It acts as a gateway into the heart of the development.

Hawley Rd Garden

Development of the

Canal Building:

April - September 2006

03

First floor: Retail restaurants and terrace

Second floor: restaurants and terrace

Third floor: restaurants and residential

April 2006

The curved form of the building draws people in and through to the site beyond

At first floor a public dining terrace fronts onto Chalk Farm Road Within the building a series of ramps connects the various levels, offering ease of movement and mitigating the requirement for stairs and escalators.

A ramp creates a clear pedestrian

connection between Chalk Farm Road

and the quay.

The public roof terrace on second floor with various types of

restaurants and small food units will form a destination

point

Different options were investigated to optimise the size of

enclosed area in relation to open spaces

Although the floor plates are staggered

to follow the ramped circulation system the structural grid is designed

to allow a variety of possible retail layouts

180: Camden: Canal Building

Schedule of areas 05.07.2006

Floor Anchor R1 indoor R1 outdoor R2 indoor R2 outdoor R3 indoor R3 outdoor Footcourt

indoor

Footcourt outdoor

Staff Rooms Core/plant

Second - - - 1,440 640 5,870 1,600 3,230 4,270 - 1,350

First - 4,020 1,400 1,440 800 - - - 1,450

Upper Ground Floor 2,570 - - - 1,500

Lower Ground Floor 2,140 - - - 2,800

Basement 1 28,560 - - - 1,690

Basement 2 8,790 1,200 1,300 - 1,760 - - - 1,560 9,155

Total 42,060 5,220 1,400 4,180 1,440 7,630 1,600 3,230 4,270 1,560 17,945

Kitchen area 30% of indoor restaurant area

The client is advised to seek specialist advice with regard to the measurement of areas.

All areas are indicative only and should not be relied upon The areas given relate to the likely areas of the building at the current state of the design.

Any decisions to be made on the basis of these predictions, whether as to project viability, pre-letting, lease agreements or the like, should include due allowance for the increases and decreases inherent in the design development and building

processes.

Kitchen areas are located in the second

basement, with dumb waiters servicing

the finishing kitchens on the restaurant

levels

residential would bring the total gross

area of the building from 189 000 sq ft

to 205 000 sq ft (incl 30 000 sq ft

residential)

Optimization of areas: June to September 2006

Planning meeting scheme Chalk Farm Rd view

Current scheme Chalk Farm Rd view

Extra floor schemeChalk Farm Rd view

Planning meeting scheme Camden Bridge view

Current scheme Camden Bridge view

Extra floor schemeCamden Bridge view

Planning meeting scheme Stables Market view

Current scheme Stables Market view

Extra floor schemeStables Market view

Base Scheme - Camden Bridge view

Chalk Farm Rd view Canal bridge view

Massing study development

Retail Retail Retail within

arches

Anchor Store

Anchor Store

Anchor Store Retail Restaurant

Duplex Appartment

Two additional floors along the back and one along the

canal frontage

Increase of enclosed area on second floor by reducing

the size of canal facing terrace.

•

•

July 2006 September 2006

Development of sections

July 2006 September 2006

Usage options analysis

04

Option 1

Floors 2, 3, 4, 5 are residential Floors B2, B1, LG, UG, and 1 are mainly retail and restaurant

Option 2

Floors 3, 4, 5 are hotel Floors B2, B1, LG, UG, 1 and 2 are mainly retail and restaurant

Option 3

Floors 2, 3, 4, 5 are hotel Floors B2, B1, LG, UG, and 1 are mainly retail and restaurant

The client is advised to seek specialist advice with regard to the measurement of areas.

All areas are indicative only and should not be relied upon The areas given relate to the likely areas of the building at the current state of the design.

Any decisions to be made on the basis of these predictions, whether as to project viability, pre-letting, lease agreements or the like, should include due allowance for the increases and

On August 9th, 2006, Make, Davis Langdon and CBRE were at

the request of the client developing a study involving various

options to the upper floors 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the Canal Building

and specifically the valuation and cost model refers to which

of these performs the best.

This chapter details the findings of the study It has been

produced in collaboration with the appointed design team

and should be read in conjunction with Davis Langdon’s cost

and area schedule

The following options have formed the basis for this study:

Base scheme

Scheme as signed off in mid July.

Option 1

Floors 2, 3, 4 and 5 are residential

Floors B2, B1, LG, UG and 1 are mainly retail and

restaurant (for this option the sloping floors and ramps

stop on level 1)

Option 2

Floors 3, 4 and 5 are hotel

Floors B2, B1, LG, UG, 1 and 2 are mainly retail and

restaurant, though there will be a hotel presence at the

front on UG and a hotel-related restaurant and bar on

first and second.

Option 3

Floors 2, 3, 4 and 5 are hotel

Floors B2, B1, LG, UG and 1 are mainly retail and

restaurant, though there will be a hotel presence at the

front on UG and a hotel-related restaurant and bar on

Indicative Rental Value psf

Indicative Yield

Completed Value psf Comments

Option 1& 2 Retail (2nd floor) 10 units £15.00-25.00 5.00% £275- £450

View based on traditional national multiple retailer, as opposed to market trader model Reduction of demand at upper levels

Degree of concern over saturation of retail accommodation in Camden

Option 1& 2 Restaurant Space (2nd Floor) 3 units £20.00-40.00 5.50% £300 - £500

Option 1 Residential (3rd floor - 5th

Lower value units to the rear; higher value overlook the lock Best local comparables include Star Wharf, Camden & Angel Wharf in Islington Estimate shows premium over these levels and assumes exclusively rivate units

Option 1A Residential (2nd floor) £500 - £700 Units with railway viaduct discounted

Option 3 Hotel (2nd floor) Total 85 - 110 rooms across

Based on £100,000 - £120,000 per room Quantum of available rooms would not appeal to a major luxury hotel brand Likely users wold be independent theme hotel or budget operator

Option 2 & 3 Hotel (3rd - 5th floors) Total 85 - 110 rooms across

Camden Lock Village, ‘Canal Building’ Upper Floor Scheme Options – Fire Safety Design Summary

The information below summarises the respective fire safety strategies which would be used to meet Building Regulation requirements depending on the use of the upper floors of the Canal Building:

leading directly to outside These routes would be separated from the non-residential accommodation by protected lobbies

Protected escape stairs and fire-fighting shafts to ground level leading directly to outside These routes would be separated from the non-residential accommodation by protected lobbies

Protected escape stairs and fire-fighting shafts to ground level leading directly to outside

evacuate upon fire alarm activation within the specific apartment

Further evacuation of other spaces would be possible, if necessary, following instructions from the attending Fire Service via a “full evacuation” control in the fire control centre

Simultaneous evacuation of the hotel upon fire alarm activation within the hotel

Further evacuation of other spaces would be possible,

if necessary, following instructions from the attending Fire Service via a “full evacuation” control in the fire control centre

Simultaneous evacuation of the entire building

Type LD3 fire alarm system The installed detectors will relay information to the landlord fire alarm panel indicating activation and mains failure of a particular unit Landlord-based detection will

be provided in the common areas of the residential building elements.

Category L2 fire alarm system designed, installed and maintained in accordance with BS 5839 part 1:2002 including a PAVA system (voice alarm)

Category L2 fire alarm system designed, installed and maintained

in accordance with BS 5839 part 1:2002 including a PAVA system (voice alarm)

No requirement for compartment floors or walls unless:

1 The building exceeds 30m in height > need compartment floors

2 a retail unit exceeds 4000m2 (assumed sprinkler protected)

on any single floor > need compartment walls

Following Section 20 guidance, smoke clearance would be needed

on every above-ground level, via either openable windows or by mechanical smoke extract system If natural ventilation is adopted each floor will need to be fitted with manually openable windows, totalling 2.5% of the floor area Any mechanical smoke extract system should be designed to achieve 6 air changes per hour

guidance, complying with BS 5306 part 2 or BSEN 12845

proposed, together with significant quantities of glazed façade

Simone Gauss make SimoneGauss@makearchitects.com

     





Make Architects have requested that NDY provide a brief review of the principal services that are likely to

be applicable to levels 3, 4 and 5 if they are:-

a) Residential units

b) Hotel Accommodation The current design philosophy for the Canal Building assumes that the upper floors will be residential units The design philosophy would be as follows:-

is not included, but this will be considered as part of the overall review in order to achieve the 10%

renewable requirement

The heating pipework to each residential unit would be sized to satisfy heating and hot water service requirements Each residential unit would be individually metered to allow the landlord to recover energy usage costs

With a centralised heating plant solution, it is not anticipated that gas pipework would be provided to residential units, with electricity being used for cooking purposes

An alternative to this centralised solution could be localised gas fired boilers to each residential unit

These localised boilers would require individual gas supplies and these installations would provide the heat source for local hot water systems as well as local heating Individual metering of each residential unit gas supply would be required

Should cooling be required to residential units, this could be achieved by centralised chiller plant serving water–cooled fan coil units or by a ground source (geothermal) system from which water would be distributed to residential units to provide a heat sink for localised room cooling units Individual meters would be required to each residential unit connection This system could permit room units to provide

NORMAN DISNEY & YOUNG 

3.00 Fire Services

The current fire strategy does not require fire protection services to the residential accommodation

An analogue addressable fire detection system would be provided in corridors, stairwells etc, however, supplemented by “domestic” detectors in residential units

4.00 Public Health Services

A centralised boosted cold water system shall provide potable cold water to each residential unit These supplies would each be sub-metered

Within each residential unit, cold water would be distributed to sanitary fixtures Hot water shall be derived from local calorifiers served by the primary heating system

5.00 Lift Services

The current proposal incorporates lifts that are allied to the cores serving residential accommodation

In the event that the upper floors provide hotel accommodation, the design philosophy would be as follows:-



1.00 Mechanical Services

Hotel rooms will almost certainly need cooling as well as heating and the centralised plant shall be procured accordingly Heating/cooling from room units would be provided Primary plant could be centralised boilers and chillers or ground source plant; the final solution be reviewed in consideration of GLA requirements The greater centralised HWS requirement would enhance the viability of CHP plant Supporting areas such as kitchens, toilets, staff accommodation etc would all require heating/cooling and ventilation The kitchens will require a gas supply These provisions will increase plant requirements above those of a residential scheme

2.00 Electrical Services

The hotel accommodation could be served from a dedicated HV meter and dedicated sub-station (dependant upon load) with sub-main distribution, generally as for the residential scheme The associated loads are likely to be higher to accommodate air conditioning and ancillary area requirements

Alternatively, a landlord sub-station could be provided, as for the residential scheme, which would satisfy all “non-anchor” loads

Supplementary systems such as telephony systems, music system (possibly), centralised TV/radio systems, access control systems etc would be in addition to te basics provisions required by the residential scheme

3.00 Fire Services

A full analogue addressable detection system would be provided throughout., including within accomaodation

Sprinkler protection may be required by Insurers

4.00 Public Health Services

The cold water system would be similar to the residential solution without the need for sub-metering

Hot water would be provided from a centralised boiler and storage unit with flow and return distribution to each room

In respect of foul and waste pipework, suspended drawings within rooms would be possible which may reduce quality of stacks

Additional hot and cold water storage and distribution services including drainage provisions etc would be required to serve the ancillary accommodation (eg kitchens, communal toilets etc)

Architect’s Statement The current scheme contains two elements which would need further detailed analysis, if any of the options were pursued.

Primarily the current design allows for the ramps, the major part of the circulation They go to level 2, where they arrive at

a grand terrace.

If either residential or a hotel occupied level 2 in place of the current retail and restaurant use, the ramps would no longer need to go to this level, so would terminate at level 1 In addition they would no longer terminate at a terrace.

The existence of a terrace at level 2 is questionable if the accommodation is either residential or a hotel at this floor, and therefore it is probable that this part of the design would be removed.

Bettridge, Turner & Partners

A hotel normally requires access for a variety of vehicles for

a number of purposes If there is no car parking customers and a hotel operator would at least expect there to be a pick

up and drop off point for taxies and private vehicles at or close to the hotels main entrance In addition to this we have been advised by Court Catering that hotels generate a significant demand for servicing with vehicles associated with food deliveries and laundry operations requiring access

at frequent intervals throughout the day The number of deliveries is difficult to determine at this stage, although CC have advised that 20 deliveries per day by small and medium sized vans would not be unusual and could be a conservative estimate This is in addition to customers being picked up and dropped off.

Although it is not clear where precisely the hotel entrance would be at ground floor level, we are assuming that it would

be positioned towards the western (Chalk Farm Road) end of the Hawley Lock building With the scheme design as it stands it is proposed that access for some small delivery vehicles would be gained from Chalk Farm Road, with the majority of deliveries taking place at the eastern end of the

site via Torbay Street There are no arrangements in the design at present to allow any cars or taxis to enter the site

It may be possible for a pick up/off point to be located at the end of Torbay Street, but this does run the risk of this area being congested and some vehicles movements being restricted/blocked from time to time It should be noted that this area will have to accommodate HGV movements

associated with a delivery bay, refuse collections and most

of the deliveries for the whole scheme, including the hotel, i.

e there will be a considerable amount of activity in a very small area Hotel customers being dropped of and collected here would have to carry or have their luggage portered a significant distance to the Hotel entrance, which is not desirable In addition having customer access to the hotel in

an area where deliveries and refuse collections take place may not be attractive to a potential operator There could be one solution to this problem, but this would impact on a design for phase 2 of the development This solution would involve maintaining Haven Street, the existing site access as

a route for traffic which could allow a pick up/drop of point for hotel customers to be located closer to its entrance and away from the sites servicing area However this will clearly impact on the design of a scheme at phase 2.

I apologize if this summary appears a little pessimistic but a traditional hotel operation does usually require a customer entrance with highway access at or very close to its This does appear to be difficult to achieve given the constraints

of the Hawley Lock site However if the client wishes to take matters further we can look in more detail at the access options outlined above as part of your overall assessment into the feasibility of a hotel

Consultant’s Statements

to be presented to Camden’s planning officials.

This option was chosen because:

CBRE’s study shows that residential has the highest capital and rental values for Camden Lock.

Options 2 & 3 require a highly engineered solution for the fire safety strategy to work - this will result in a significant increase in cost.

For options 2 & 3 more area is needed for plant rooms due to additional sprinkler requirement and smoke ventilation of upper floors.

The evacuation strategy for hotel use will require more area for means of escape.

Hotel floors require air-conditioning what will increase costs and required plant room area

Any type of hotel requires an area for pick-up and drop-off, difficult to accommodate on Chalk Farm Road.

Servicing for a hotel will increase areas for delivery and refuse significantly Additional volume of delivery traffic would have a negative impact on access routes and neighbouring developments.

The ratio between required ‘support areas’ (catering, servicing) and area available for hotel rooms is unfavourable.

The scheme was presented to Camden on 26 September 2006 and was warmly received It is in a robust state to take to public consultation and forward to planning This scheme is illustrated on the following section.

The major implication of providing a hotel on the upper

floors of the building is that the hotel would be evacuated

simultaneously in the event of a fire within the hotel (the

other areas of the building would only be evacuated

following instructions from the attending fire service).

This would mean that the required minimum storey exit and

stair widths from the hotel levels would wider than the

minimum requirements for a residential apartment scheme

(where only the fire-affected apartment would be evacuated,

not all of the apartments)

Other implications that a hotel will have on the scheme

include:

- A fire detection and alarm system installed to a L2 standard

and provided with voice alarm, would be required in the hotel;

- The corridors serving the hotel bedrooms would need to be

constructed to achieve at least 30 minutes fire resistance

Section 20 would require that smoke ventilation is provided

from each level of the hotel building However, if an ‘open

balcony’ approach is used to design the corridors then the

smoke ventilation would not be required.

- Section 20 would also require sprinklers to be installed in

the building, however It is planned to justify against this

requirement with statutory authorities The installation of

sprinklers would be considered as a design risk item.

Court Catering

Camden Lock Village

Catering / Hotel Operation

The comments enclosed are consistent with either option 2

or option 3 as regards the possible hotel facility.

Delivery

First indications from the outline scheme would lead us to

believe that there will be logistic issues as far as the number

of deliveries and refuse collections are concerned with just

the restaurant scheme If there is a hotel as well this will only

increase the problem with additional deliveries throughout the day of linen, housekeeping products as well as any additional catering requirements.

Hotel Catering There would also appear to be no clear definition as to the catering facilities within the hotel Where is breakfast to be served and will there also be a room service facility? Is there

to be an in-house restaurant or are guests to use the other restaurants in the complex?

Storage This does not appear to be adequately catered for

Consideration should be given to the following likely additional storage requirements:-

Refuse General Equipment Store Beverages Mini Bar Store

Dry Goods Dirty and Clean Linen Staff

Consideration must also be given to staff welfare facilities.

Staff Restaurant Male & Female changing rooms & showers Staff Toilets

Offices Hotel operation will require additional office space for the following functions:-

Food and Beverage operations Chef’s Office

Human resources

• General

• Is there to be a main hotel bar

• Are there going to be meeting/function rooms

• What standard of operation is the hotel? 3 or 4 star.

These are just some initial thoughts which can be expanded upon as the project develops but let me know if you require any further information.

Design drawings

05

Staff Staff

Plant

Plant

Plant Market

Servicing

Plant Plant

Plant Plant

Market Market

Lower ground floor

Upper ground floor

Retail

Market

Market

Market Market

Market

Public resi terrace

Apartments

Apartments Apartments

Apartments

Apartments

Apartments

Apartments

Circulation in retail floors

Circulation in residential floors

Access from Chalk Farm Road

Access from canal side

3 private residential entrances

Short-cuts via escalators

Access from ‘Mews’

Destination point on second floor terrace

Circulation diagrams

Long section Cross section

Camden Lock Village Canal Building - Stage C report 25 October 2006 Page 70

Camden Lock Village Canal Building - Stage C report 25 October 2006 Page 72

Living spaces are fully glazed whilst intimate ‘slot windows’

in the bedrooms provide privacy.

The brass cladding responds to the tone and character of local materials like the brick railway viaduct.

Cladding study

Camden Lock Village Canal Building - Stage C report 25 October 2006 Page 76

06