1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Báo cáo y học: "Early venovenous haemodiafiltration for sepsis-related multiple organ failure" pptx

2 234 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 2
Dung lượng 32,07 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Page 1 of 2page number not for citation purposes Available online http://ccforum.com/content/10/2/409 In a prospective observational study that included 60 consecutive patients over a 10

Trang 1

Page 1 of 2

(page number not for citation purposes)

Available online http://ccforum.com/content/10/2/409

In a prospective observational study that included 60

consecutive patients over a 10-year period, Page and

coworkers [1] studied the effects of early continuous

veno-venous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) during sepsis-induced

multiple organ failure In two-thirds of the patients rapid

metabolic improvement during CVVHDF was associated with

circulatory improvement and a low mortality rate, whereas lack

of metabolic improvement after 12 hours of CVVHDF (mainly

based on changes in base excess) was associated with a

100% mortality rate The authors concluded that early

CVVHDF may improve the prognosis of sepsis-related multiple

organ failure, and that failure to correct metabolic acidosis

rapidly during the procedure is a strong predictor of mortality

In that study, metabolic acidosis was assessed using base

excess values, and the authors highlighted the influence of

individual changes 6-12 hours after initiation of CVVHDF on

predicted outcome However, despite the findings reported,

the usefulness of base excess is questionable First, because

of the high incidence of circulatory failure occurring after

several days of hospitalization, base excess may be

influenced by large volume crystalloid infusion, resulting in

altered protein status Second, the link between base excess

and lactate concentration was weak (r2= 0.36 for the

patients studied) We believe that lactate values may be more

important in predicting outcome than base excess Indeed, it

is widely accepted that early lactate clearance is associated with improved outcomes in septic shock [2] and that lactate levels are not affected by CVVHDF [3] In the study by Page and coworkers [1] one cannot exclude the possibility that the lack of improvement in base excess in the nonresponder group was linked to persistent lactate production, and so metabolic improvement during the procedure is not necessarily superior to the trend in blood lactate as a predictive tool

Although beneficial effects of early high-volume isovolaemic haemofiltration have been reported [4,5], such benefits may not be realized with standard volume procedures [6] Furthermore, a randomized study design would have enhanced the strength of the findings reported by Page and coworkers [1] Moreover, we believe that a comparison between observed mortality and that predicted by Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II does not permit one to draw conclusions regarding whether CVVHDF has a beneficial effect [7], at least for secondary shock, in view of the poor performance of physiological scores for delayed acute renal failure

In summary, this study of standard volume CVVHDF in sepsis [1] is undoubtedly important, but its findings should be viewed with caution until further investigations have been undertaken

Letter

Early venovenous haemodiafiltration for sepsis-related multiple organ failure

Frédéric M Jacobs and François G Brivet

Service de Réanimation Médiacle, Hôpital Antoine Béclère-Assistance, Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Corresponding author: Frédéric M Jacobs, frederic.jacobs@abc.aphp.fr

Published: 27 April 2006 Critical Care 2006, 10:409 (doi:10.1186/cc4906)

This article is online at http://ccforum.com/content/10/2/409

© 2006 BioMed Central Ltd

See related research by Page et al., http://ccforum.com/content/9/6/R755

Authors’ response

Antoine Vieillard-Baron and François Jardin

We thank Drs Jacobs and Brivet for their remarks

Beyond the pertinence of comparing predicted mortality by

SAPS II with observed mortality, the overall mortality rate of our

population was 53%, which is far from the 85% and 92%

mortality rates previously reported in similar populations [8,9]

Moreover, in a previous prospective study conducted by Dr Brivet himself and his coworkers [10], the mortality rate in patients who exhibited acute renal failure related to septic shock was as high as 79.4%, whereas the mean SAPS score was 19, corresponding to a mean SAPS II score of about 50, which is much lower than the SAPS II score in our population [1]

Trang 2

Page 2 of 2

(page number not for citation purposes)

Critical Care Vol 10 No 2 Jacobs and Brivet

Drs Jacobs and Brivet consider base excess to be of

questionable usefulness in assessing metabolic acidosis

However, as they point out above, it appears not to perform

so poorly because the change in base excess after 12 hours

of CVVHDF strongly discriminated those patients with a

100% mortality rate They also suggest that base excess

could in part reflect hyperchloraemic acidosis induced by

large volume crystalloid infusion However, as reported in

Table 2 of our report [1], plasma chloride concentration was

in the normal range and did not differ between the two

groups On the other hand, we agree that base excess

reflects not only lactic acidosis but also renal acidosis

However, in our opinion, this is better for evaluating the

severity of illness in such patients because it takes into

account two of the main parameters that have been reported

to be associated with high mortality rates in sepsis (i.e renal

failure and persistent lactic acidosis) [11]

Drs Jacobs and Brivet point out that we did not use

high-volume haemofiltration It is true that we used a flow rate of

only 2000 ml/hour, leading to an average convection

exchange of 28 ml/kg per hour However, because we

performed CVVHDF, we also used 1000 ml/hour of dialysis,

leading to a ‘global exchange’ of about 40 ml/kg per hour

Finally, Drs Jacobs and Brivet suggest that the lack of

improvement in base excess in nonresponders may have been

linked to persistent lactate production Indeed, it was caused

by persistent lactate production! However, on reading the

latter comment by Drs Jacobs and Brivet, we wonder whether

they completely understood our report, in which CVVHDF is

proposed to be an additional means to ameliorate circulatory

failure, not a treatment for acidosis per se.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

References

1 Page B, Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Peyrousset O, Rabiller A,

Beauchet A, Aegerter P, Jardin F: Early veno-venous

haemodi-afiltration for sepsis-related multiple organ failure Crit Care

2005, 9:R755-R763.

2 Marecaux G, Pinsky MR, Dupont E, Kahn R J, Vincent JL: Blood

lactate levels are better prognostic indicators than TNF and

IL-6 levels in patients with septic shock Intensive Care Med

1996, 22:404-408.

3 Levraut J, Ciebiera JP, Jambou P, Ichai C, Labib Y, Grimaud D:

Effect of continuous venovenous hemofiltration with dialysis

on lactate clearance in critically ill patients Crit Care Med

1997, 25:58-62.

4 Honore PM, Jamez J, Wauthier M, Lee PA, Dugernier T, Pirenne B,

Hanique G, Matson JR: Prospective evaluation of short-term, high

volume isovolemic hemofiltration on the hemodynamic course

and outcome in patients with intractable circulatory failure

resulting from septic shock Crit Care Med 2000, 28:3581-3587.

5 Piccini P, Dan M, Barbacini S, Carraro R, Lieta E, Marafon S,

Zam-peretti N, Brendolan A, D’Intini V, Tetta C, et al.: Early

iso-volaemic haemofiltration in oliguric patients with septic

shock Intensive Care Med 2006, 32:80-86.

6 Cole L, Bellomo R, Journois D, Davenport P, Baldwin I, Tipping P:

High-volume haemofiltration in human septic shock Intensive

Care Med 2001, 27:978-986.

7 The EPISEPSIS Study Group: EPISEPSIS: a reappraisal of the epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis in French

inten-sive care units Inteninten-sive Care Med 2004, 30:580-588.

8 Abid O, Akça S, Haji-Michael P, Vincent JL: Strong vasopressor support may be futile in the intensive care unit patient with

multiple organ failure Crit Care Med 2000, 28:947-949.

9 Martin C, Viviand X, Leone M, Thirion X: Effect of norepinephrine

on the outcome of septic shock Crit Care Med 2000,

28:2758-2765

10 Neveu H, Kleinknecht D, Brivet F, Loirat P, Landais P: Prognostic factors in acute renal failure due to sepsis Results of a prospective multicentre study The French Study Group on

Acute Renal Failure Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996, 11:293-299.

11 Smith L, Kumar P, Molloy S, Rhodes A, Newman P, Grounds R,

Bennett E: Base excess and lactate as prognostic indicators

for patients admitted to intensive care Intensive Care Med

2001, 27:74-83.

Ngày đăng: 12/08/2014, 23:23

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm