Map showing annual estimated agricultural pesticide herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides use in the conterminous United States, by county.. Map showing annual estimated agricultural
Trang 1PESTICIDES IN SURFACE WATERS
Distribution, Trends, and Governing Factors
Trang 2Pesticides in Surface Waters
Distribution, Trends, and Governing Factors
Steven J Larson, U.S Geological Survey, Minneapolis, Minnesota Paul D Capel, U.S Geological Survey, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Michael S Majewski, U.S Geological Survey, Sacramento, California
Volume Three of the Series
Pesticides in the Hydrologic System
U.S Geological Survey National Water Quality Assessment Program
Ann Arbor Press, Inc
Chelsea, Michigan
Trang 3Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Larson, Steven J
Pesticides in surface waters : distribution, trends, and governing factors
1 Steven J Larson, Paul D Capel, Michael S Majewski
Includes bibliographical references and index
1 Pesticides-Environmental aspects-United States
Neither this book nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S Government
No claim to original U.S Government works
International Standard Book Number 1-57504-006-9
Library of Congress Card Number 97-
Printed in the United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
Printed on acid-free paper
Trang 4INTRODUCTION TO THE SERIES
Pesticides in the Hydrologic System is a series of comprehensive reviews and analyses of our
current knowledge and understanding of pesticides in the water resources of the United States and of the principal factors that influence contamination and transport The series is presented according to major components of the hydrologic system-the atmosphere, surface water, bed sediments and aquatic organisms, and ground water Each volume:
summarizes previous review efforts;
presents a comprehensive tabulation, review, and analysis of studies that have measured pesticides and their transformation products in the environment;
maps locations of studies reviewed, with cross references to original publications; analyzes national and regional patterns of pesticide occurrence in relation to such factors as the use of pesticides and their chemical characteristics;
summarizes processes that govern the sources, transport, and fate of pesticides in each component of the hydrologic system;
synthesizes findings from studies reviewed to address key questions about pesticides
in the hydrologic system, such as:
How do agricultural and urban areas compare?
What are the effects of agricultural management practices?
What is the influence of climate and other natural factors?
How do the chemical and physical properties of a pesticide influence its behavior
in the hydrologic system?
How have past study designs and methods affected our present understanding? Are water quality criteria for human health or aquatic life being exceeded? Are long-term trends evident in pesticide concentrations in the hydrologic system?
This series is unique in its facus on review and interpretation of reported direct measurements of pesticides in the environment Each volume characterizes hundreds of studies conducted during the past four decades Detailed summary tables include such features as spatial and temporal domain studied, target analytes, detection limits, and compounds detected for each study reviewed
Pesticides in the Hydrologic System is designed for use by a wide range of readers in the
environmental sciences The analysis of national and regional patterns of pesticide occurrence, and their relation to use and other factors that influence pesticides in the hydrologic system, provides a synthesis of current knowledge for scientists, engineers, managers, and policy makers at all levels of government, in industry and agriculture, and in other organizations The interpretive analyses and summaries are designed to facilitate comparisons of past findings to current and future findings Data of a specific nature can be located for any particular area of the country For educational needs, teachers and students can readily identify example data sets that meet their requirements Through its focus on the United States, the series covers a large portion
of the global database on pesticides in the hydrologic system, and international readers will find
Trang 5much that applies to other areas of the world Overall, the goal of the series is to provide readers from a broad range of backgrounds in the environmental sciences with a synthesis of the factual data and interpretive findings on pesticides in the hydrologic system
The series has been developed as part of the National Water Quality Assessment Program of the U S Geological Survey, Department of the Interior Assessment of pesticides in the nation's water resources is one of the top priorities for the Program, which began in 1991 This comprehensive national review of existing information serves as the basis for design and interpretation of studies of pesticides in major hydrologic systems of the United States now being conducted as part of the National Water Quality Assessment
Series Editor Robert J Gilliom
U S Geological Survey
Trang 6The use of pesticides in the United States has increased dramatically during the last several decades Hundreds of different chemicals have been developed for use in agricultural and non-agricultural settings Concerns about the potential adverse effects of pesticides on the environment and human health have spurred an enormous amount of research into their environmental behavior and fate Much of this concern has focused on the potential for contamination of the hydrologic system, including surface waters Pesticides in Surface Waters
is the first comprehensive summary of research on the occurrence, distribution, and significance
of pesticides in surface waters of the United States
The primary goal of this book is to assess the current understanding of the occurrence and behavior of pesticides in surface waters To accomplish this, we have compiled and evaluated most of the published studies in which pesticide concentrations in surface waters of the United States have been measured The primary focus of the literature search was on studies published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature and in reports of government agencies The literature search covered studies published up to 1993, but many articles and reports published after 1993 were included as they became available A number of studies-including laboratory studies and studies using microcosms and artificial streams and ponds-also were included in which factors affecting the behavior and fate of pesticides in the environment were investigated Pertinent studies listed in a series of tables provide concise summaries of study sites, targeted pesticides, and results Information obtained from these studies is used to develop an overview
of the existing knowledge of pesticide contamination of surface waters
Pesticides in Surface Waters is intended to serve as a resource, text, and reference to a
wide spectrum of scientists, students, and water managers, ranging from those primarily interested in the extensive compilations of references, to those looking for interpretive analyses and conclusions For those unfamiliar with the studies of pesticides in surface waters, it can serve as a comprehensive introduction
The preparation of this book was made possible by the National Water Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program of the U.S Geological Survey (USGS) The authors wish to thank Naomi Nakagaki, who produced nearly all of the maps used in this book, and Theresa Gilchrist for her assistance in organizing and summarizing many of the articles obtained as part
of the review Robert Gilliom of the USGS provided excellent technical advice and guidance in the preparation of this book Tom Sklarsky, Susan Davis, Yvonne Gobert, and Glenn Schwegmann provided excellent and conscientious editing and manuscript preparation We are greatly indebted to Dr Michael Meyer of the USGS and to Dr R Peter Richards of Heidelberg College (Ohio) for their thorough reviews of the manuscript Their suggestions greatly improved the quality of the book
Steven J Larson Paul D Cape1 Michael S Majewski
Trang 7EDITOR'S NOTE
This work was prepared by the United States Geological Survey Though it has been edited for commercial publication, some of the style and usage incorporated is based on the United States Geological Survey's publication guidelines (i.e., Suggestions to Authors, 7th edition, 1991) For example, references with more than two authors cited in the text are written
as "Smith and others (19xx)," rather than "Smith, et al (lgxx)," decades are written with an apostrophe (e.g., 19801s), and common-use compound adjectives are hyphenated when used as a modifier (e.g., quality-control procedures) Hyphenation and capitalization are repeated when used in an original reference (e.g., State-Wide) For units of measure, the metric system is used except for the reporting of pesticide use, which is commonly expressed in English units The original system of units is used when data are quoted from other sources The Abbreviations and Acronyms in the front of the book do not include the names of some models mentioned, either because the name was not formed from first parts of a series of words or because only the name was given in the original source
Every attempt has been made to design figures and tables as "stand-alone," without the need for repeated cross reference to the text for interpretation of graphics or tabular data Some exceptions have been made, however, because of the complexity or breadth of the figure or table In some cases, for example, a figure caption makes reference to a table when the same data are used for both As an aid in comparison, the same shading patterns are shown in the Explanation of all pesticide usage maps, though each pattern may not necessarily apply to every map Some of the longer tables are located at the end of the chapter to maintain less disruption
of text
As an organizational aid to the author and reader, chapter headings, figures, and tables are identified in chapter-numbered sequence The Abbreviations and Acronyms in the front of the book do not include chemical names, which are listed in the Appendix
Trang 8CONTENTS
IntroductiontotheSeries
Preface
Editor'sNote
ListofFigures
ListofTables
ConversionFactors
Abbreviations and Acronyms
Abstract
Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1hrpose
1.2 Previous Reviews 1.3 Approach
Chapter 2 Characteristics of Studies Reviewed
2.1Introduction
2.2 General Design Features
2.3TargetAnalytes
2.4 Geographic Distribution
2.5 Temporal Distribution
2.6 Matrices Sampled
2.7 Analytical Limits of Detection
2.8 Influence of Study Design Chapter 3 Overview of Occurrence and Distribution of Pesticides in Relation to Use
3.1Occurrence
3.2 National Pesticide Use
Agriculturaluse Pesticide Use in Urban Areas
Pesticide Use in Forestry
Pesticide Use on Roadways and Rights-of-way
Aquatic Pesticide Use
3.3 Occurrence and Distribution in Relation to Use Introduction
Organochlorine Insecticides
Organophosphorus Insecticides Triazine and Acetanilide Herbicides
Phenoxy Acid Herbicides
Other Herbicides Insecticides and Fungicides
Herbicides
Insecticides
Fungicides 3.4 Long-Term Trends in Pesticide Occurrence in Surface Waters
Organochlorine Insecticides
Organophosphorus and Other Insecticides
Triazine and Acetanilide Herbicides v vii
V l l l
xi xiv
xv xvi
1
Trang 9Chapter 4 Factors Controlling the Behavior and Fate of Pesticides in Surface Waters 217
4.1 Sources of Pesticides to Surface Waters 217
Introduction 217
Pesticides from Agricultural Applications 217
Pesticides from Forestry Applications 219
Pesticides from Roadways and Rights-of-way 220
Pesticides from Urban and Suburban Applications 221
Pesticides from Aquatic Applications 222
Pesticides from Manufacturing Waste and Accidental Spills 223
Pesticides from Ground Water 224
Pesticides from the Atmosphere 225
Pesticides from Bed Sediments 226
4.2 Behavior and Fate of Pesticides in Surface Waters 227
Introduction 227
Transformation Processes 227
Phase-Transfer Processes 230
Transport of Pesticides in Surface Waters 232
Chapter 5 Analysis of Key Topics-Sources Behavior and Transport 235
5.1 Seasonal Patterns of Pesticide Occurrence 235 5.2 Sources and Concentrations of Pesticides in Remote Water Bodies 244
5.3 Impact of Urban-Use Pesticides on Surface Water Quality 246
5.4 Impact of Forestry-Use Pesticides on Surface Water Quality 248
5.5 Pesticide Transformation Products in Surface Waters 250
5.6 Modeling of Pesticides in Surface Waters 253
Structure-Activity Models 254
Runoff Models 256
Surface Water Transport Models 258
Multimedia Models 258
Use of Models 260 Chapter 6 Analysis of Key Topics-Environmental Significance 263
6.1 Implications for Human Health 263
6.2 Implications for Health of Aquatic Organisms 275
Pesticide Concentrations Exceeding Aquatic-Life Criteria Values 275
Fish Kills Attributed to Pesticides 278 Effects of Atrazine on Aquatic Organisms and Ecosystems 279
6.3 Environmental Significance of Pesticide Transformation Products in Surfacewaters 280
Chapter 7 Summary and Conclusions 285 Appendix: Glossary of Common and Chemical Names of Pesticides 288
Trang 10
LIST OF FIGURES
1.1 Diagram showing potential routes for pesticide movement into and through
components of the hydrologic cycle 2.1 Map showing sampling sites of selected national and multistate studies conducted
predominately during the 1950's-1960's
2.2 Map showing sampling sites of selected national and multistate studies conducted predominately during the 1970's 2.3 Map showing sampling sites of selected national and multistate studies conducted predominately during the 1980's 2.4 Map showing sampling sites of selected national and multistate studies conducted during1990-1992
2.5 Maps showing geographic distribution of reviewed state and local monitoring
studies and process and matrix distribution studies
2.6 Bar graph showing distribution of pesticide study efforts by decade 3.1 Map showing geographic distribution of expenditures for agricultural chemicals,
excluding fertilizer, in 1987
3.2 Map showing annual estimated agricultural pesticide (herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides) use in the conterminous United States, by county 3.3 Map showing annual estimated agricultural herbicide use in the
conterminous United States, by county 3.4 Map showing annual estimated agricultural insecticide use in the
conterminous United States, by county 3.5 Map showing annual estimated agricultural fungicide use in the conterminous United States, by county 3.6 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the herbicide alachlor in the conterminous United States, by county 3.7 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the herbicide atrazine in the conterminous United States, by county 3.8 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the herbicide butylate in the conterminous United States, by county 3.9 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the herbicide cyanazine in the conterminous United States, by county 3.10 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the herbicide 2,4-D in the
conterminous United States, by county 3.11 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the herbicide EPTC in the
conterminous United States, by county 3.12 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the herbicide glyphosate in the conterminous United States, by county 3.13 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the herbicide MCPA in the conterminous United States, by county 3.14 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the herbicide metolachlor in the conterminous United States, by county 3.15 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the herbicide molinate in the conterminous United States, by county 3.16 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the herbicide simazine in the conterminous United States, by county 3.17 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the herbicide trifluralin in the conterminous United States, by county 3.18 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the insecticide aldicarb in the conterminous United States, by county
Trang 113.19 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the insecticide carbaryl in the
conterminous United States, by county 158 3.20 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the insecticide carbofuran in the conterminous United States, by county 159 3.21 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the insecticide chlorpyrifos in the conterminous United States, by county 160 3.22 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the insecticide diazinon in the
conterminous United States, by county 161 3.23 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the insecticide disulfoton in the conterminous United States, by county 162 3.24 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the insecticide malathion in the conterminous United States, by county 163 3.25 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the insecticide methidathion
in the conterminous United States, by county 164 3.26 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the insecticide methomyl in the conterminous United States, by county 165 3.27 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the insecticide methyl parathion
in the conterminous United States, by county 166 3.28 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the insecticide oxamyl in the
conterminous United States, by county 167 3.29 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the insecticide permethrin in the conterminous United States, by county 168 3.30 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the insecticide phorate in the
conterminous United States, by county 169 3.3 1 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the insecticide propargite in the conterminous United States, by county 170 3.32 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the insecticide terbufos in the
conterminous United States, by county 171 3.33 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the fungicide captan in the
conterminous United States, by county 172 3.34 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the fungicide chlorothalonil in the conterminous United States, by county 173 3.35 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the fungicide mancozeb in the
3.36 Map showing annual estimated agricultural use of the fungicide maneb in the
3.39 Map showing combined regional agricultural use of aldrin and dieldrin in 1971,
and detection frequency of dieldrin in rivers and streams of the western
3.40 Map showing regional agricultural use of lindane in 1971, and detection
frequency of lindane in rivers and streams of the western United States from
1967to1971 188 3.41 Map showing geographic distribution of herbicide and metabolite detections
in midwestern reservoirs, and locations of reservoirs in which concentrations of
one or more herbicides exceeded a U.S Environmental Protection Agency
maximum contaminant level or health advisory level for drinking water 196
Trang 123.42 Bar graph showing riverine flux of herbicides at three sites on the Mississippi River and at sites on six major tributaries in 1991, expressed as a percentage of the amount applied agriculturally in each basin 197 3.43 Graph showing riverine flux of herbicides in relation to the amount applied
agriculturally in the drainage basins at three sites on the Mississippi River
and at sites on six tributaries in 1991 198 3.44 Map showing regional agricultural use of 2,4-D in 1971, and detection frequency
of 2,4-D in rivers and streams of the western United States, 1967-1971 203 3.45 Scatter charts showing seasonal patterns of 2,4-D and atrazine
concentrations in the Susquehanna River at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, from
Mxch1980toApril1981 205 3.46 Line graph showing seasonal patterns of atrazine, alachlor, and cyanazine
concentrations, and river discharge in the Minnesota River at Mankato,
Minnesota, from April 1990 to October 1991 2 12 3.47 Line graphs showing monthly, time-weighted mean concentrations of alachlor,
atrazine, and metolachlor in Honey Creek, Ohio, 1983-1991 213 3.48 Bar graphs showing annual mean concentrations of atrazine at four sites on the
Mississippi River, 1975-1 99 1 214 3.49 Bar graphs showing annual mean concentrations of atrazine in three midwestern
and selected degradation products in 147 midwestern streams in 1989, and in
76 midwestern reservoirs in 1992 238 5.3 Line graphs showing loads (fluxes) of diazinon and methidathion in the Sacramento River at Sacramento and the San Joaquin River at Vernalis in January and
February 1993 239 5.4 Line graphs showing concentrations of three rice pesticides in the Colusa Basin
Drain in the Sacramento Valley, California 240 5.5 Line graph showing concentrations of 2,4-D and river discharge in the Yakima River
at Kiona, Washington, 1966-1971 241 5.6 Bar graph showing concentrations of the herbicides MCPP, MCPA, dicamba,
and 2,4-D in storm drains that drain a residential watershed in Minneapolis,
Minnesota, from April to October 1993 241 5.7 Line graphs showing comparison of river discharge, atrazine concentrations,
and diazinon concentrations in the White (Indiana), Ohio, and Illinois Rivers,
1991-1992 243 5.8 Bar graph showing detection frequencies of selected organochlorine pesticides
and their transformation products in ambient waters, 1980-1982 252 5.9 Diagram of a conceptual model for runoff from agricultural fields 257