Advanced patellofemoral arthritis TREATMENT Patellofemoral arthroplasty SUBMITTED BY Tom Minas, MD, and Tim Bryant, RN, Cartilage Repair Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Chestnut
Trang 1Case 24 83
FIGURE C24.3 Posteroanterior 45-degree flexion weight-bearing (A) and lateral (B) radiograph obtained 14 months after allograft medial meniscus transplantation and revision ACL reconstruction
mattress sutures and seating of the posterior
bone plug into its recipient tunnel The anterior
horn was fixed into a blind tunnel at the
anatomic insertion of the native meniscus
inser-tion site Finally, the ACL was passed and
secured with a staple on the tibia and a Ugament
button on the femur due to slight graft
mis-match and partial compromise of the posterior
cortex of the femur (Figure C24.2D,E)
Postop-erative rehabilitation was guided primarily by
the ACL protocol except for restriction of
weight bearing beyond 90 degrees of knee
flexion for the first 6 weeks Return to
unre-stricted activities was permitted at 6 months
FOLLOW-UP
At 18 months, the patient had full range of
motion, denied any medial-sided knee pain, and
had no complaints of instability He had a grade
I Lachman examination with a firm endpoint
and a negligible pivot shift Radiographs
demonstrated excellent positioning of the ACL
graft and proper seating of the meniscus
trans-plant bone plugs No evidence of joint space
narrowing was present (Figure C24.3) Repeat KT-2000 evaluation revealed a 2-mm side-to-side difference on maximum manual testing The patient recently returned to participating
in competitive soccer
DECISION-MAKING FACTORS
1 Young, high-demand patient with ipsilateral symptoms related to a prior subtotal menis-cectomy with a chief complaint of pain and instabiUty
2 Loss of the primary (ACL) and secondary (posterior horn of the medial meniscus) restraints to anterior translation of the left knee
3 Intact articular cartilage
4 A relative contraindication to performing
an isolated medial meniscus transplant without ACL reconstruction Similarly, revi-sion ACL reconstruction without improving the secondary restraints for anterior tibial translation may place the newly recon-structed ACL at continued risk for prema-ture failure
This is trial version www.adultpdf.com
Trang 2Advanced patellofemoral arthritis
TREATMENT
Patellofemoral arthroplasty
SUBMITTED BY
Tom Minas, MD, and Tim Bryant, RN, Cartilage Repair Center, Brigham and
Women's Hospital, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA
CHIEF COMPLAINT AND
HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS
The patient is a 41-year-old man with a
long-standing history of anterior right knee pain As
a teenager he sustained a patellar dislocation
with an osteoarticular fracture An open VMO
quadriceps repair and removal of loose body
was performed Since then, five further
arthro-scopic debridements have been performed
Presently he complains of chronic right anterior
knee pain He uses antiinflammatories and ice
for pain management only He has pain that
awakens him at night when he rolls over in bed
He is able to walk better on level surfaces than
on inclines or up and down stairs Additionally,
he must use a handrail one step at a time to
ascend or descend the stairs He has frequent
activity-related effusions He requests a
defini-tive operation that will relieve him of his pain
and allow him to rapidly return to work to
support his family His job does not require
physical or labor-intensive activities
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
Height, 6ft, lin.; weight, 2101b Clinical
exami-nation demonstrates a relatively fit 41-year-old
man with clinically neutral ahgnment He walks
with an antalgic gait He must use his hands to
get out of a seated position; he is unable to
crouch or squat His range of motion is from 0
to 125 degrees of flexion Other findings include severe patellofemoral crepitation, a large joint effusion, and a relatively normal quadriceps angle of 15 degrees His ligament and meniscal examination is unremarkable
RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION
Standing radiographs demonstrate a well-maintained tibiofemoral joint space Radi-ographs demonstrate a narrowed patello-femoral joint space (Figure C25.1)
SURGICAL INTERVENTION
At arthrotomy, the tibiofemoral articulations were intact The patellofemoral joint demon-strated severe erosive grade IV changes to the trochlea and the patella with a convex hypoplastic trochlea (Figure C25.2) A patellofemoral arthroplasty was performed (Figure C25.3) Postoperatively, the patient advanced readily to weight bearing and range
of motion as tolerated
FOLLOW-UP
Within 3 weeks of his patellofemoral prosthe-sis, the patient was pain free and returned to work Two years after implantation, he remains satisfied with the result
84
This is trial version www.adultpdf.com
Trang 3Case 25 85
FIGURE C25.1 Preoperative plain standing anteroposterior (A) and skyline (B) radiographs demonstrate normal tibiofemoral joint space with central and lateral patellofemoral compartment joint space narrowing
FIGURE C25.2 Appearance at the time of open
arthrotomy The trochlea is convex, hypoplastic, and
has severe erosive changes Similarly, the patella has
a large area of exposed bone and has a dysplastic concave appearance
This is trial version www.adultpdf.com
Trang 4FIGURE C25.3 Postoperative plain lateral (A), anteroposterior (B), and skyline (C) radiographs demonstrate inset trochlear cobalt-chrome prosthe-sis and onset patellar polyethylene prostheprosthe-sis
DECISION-MAKING FACTORS
1 Advanced, highly symptomatic, isolated
patellofemoral arthritis unresponsive to
prior efforts at debridement and
conserva-tive management
2 Disease extent poses a highly guarded
prognosis for autologous chondrocyte
implantation (ACI) Although
osteochon-dral allograft remains a viable treatment
option, it also carries a more guarded
prog-nosis, and the patient is unwilling to undergo
the prolonged rehabilitation required of this cartilage transplantation procedure
A willingness to maintain relatively reduced activity levels to maximize the longevity of patellofemoral arthroplasty The patient desires a predictable outcome and has low-demand requirements
Informed consent that should the patellofemoral arthroplasty fail, revision to total knee arthroplasty is unHkely to be compromised
This is trial version www.adultpdf.com
Trang 5PATHOLOGY
Multiple chondral defects
TREATMENT
Autologous chondrocyte implantation of the trochlea and medial and lateral
femoral condyles
SUBMITTED BY
Jack Farr, MD, Cartilage Restoration Center of Indiana, Ortholndy,
Indi-anapolis, Indiana, USA
CHIEF COMPLAINT AND
HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS
This patient is a 43-year-old man with a 10-year
history of lateral- greater than medial-sided
knee pain as well as anterior knee pain He
complains of catching and effusions in his right
knee At the time of evaluation, he provided a
history of having undergone arthroscopic
treat-ment previously that provided minimal relief of
his symptoms The patient works as a full-time
firefighter and complained of difficulty
per-forming all his duties because of
activity-related pain His desire is to return to higher
levels of activity that he previously enjoyed,
including jogging and racquetball At the time
of initial presentation, he limited his activities
to golf and biking and had gained 401b during
the previous 2 years
Review of the operative record indicates that
6 years previously he underwent chondroplasty
and drilling of his femoral condyle A repeat
chondroplasty and drilling was performed 1
year before presentation Despite these
treat-ments, his symptoms recurred
with a slightly antalgic gait on the right He has
a trace effusion He has no gross atrophy His range of motion is 0 to 130 degrees on the right compared to 0 to 135 degrees on the left His ligament exam is unremarkable He has marked tenderness on the lateral joint line and, to a lesser degree, at the medial joint line and patellofemoral joint There are no mechanical signs, and patellar tracking is normal
RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION Weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs show slight medial joint space nar-rowing and ossification changes in the lateral femoral condyle (due to prior drilling) (Figure C26.1).The Merchant view shows the patella to
be centrally located His long-leg alignment views show only 2 degrees of varus compared
to the contralateral side His magnetic reso-nance image (MRI) is consistent with a chronic osteochondritis dissecans of the lateral femoral condyle and chondrosis of the medial and patellofemoral compartments
Height, 5 ft, 9 in.; weight, 2281b The patient
stands in slight varus alignment compared to
neutral on the contralateral hmb He ambulates
At the time of staging arthroscopy and biopsy for autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), grade IV chondrosis was noted at the
87
This is trial version www.adultpdf.com
Trang 6trochlea (2.0cm by 3.0cm), medial (1.5cm by
2.0 cm), and lateral (1.2 cm by 1.1cm) femoral
condyles (Figure C26.2) These lesions were
contained The opposing articular cartilage was
intact At the time of definitive treatment, ACI
was performed for all three lesions (Figure
C26.3) No realignment was performed
FIGURE C26.2 At index arthroscopy, lesions of the (A) medial femoral condyle, (B) trochlea, and (C) lateral femoral condyle are visualized
FIGURE C26.1 Anteroposterior (A) and lateral
(B) radiographs demonstrate maintenance of joint
spaces
This is trial version www.adultpdf.com
Trang 7Case 26 89
A DRB
FIGURE C26.3 Autologous chondrocyte
implanta-tion (ACI) periosteal patches in place: (A) medial
and lateral femoral condyles and (B) trochlea
Postoperatively, the patient was made
pro-tected weight bearing with crutches for 6 weeks
and utilized continuous passive motion for 3
weeks initially with restricted motion The
patient slowly advanced to full, unrestricted
activities by 18 months
FOLLOW-UP
The patient had returned to high-level activities
including full-time firefiighting Second-look
arthroscopy 3 years following the implantation
revealed excellent fill and marginal integration
of all defects (Figure C26.4)
FIGURE C26.4 Second-look arthroscopy demon-strates excellent fill and marginal integration of (A) trochlea, (B) medial femoral condyle, and (C) lateral femoral condyle
This is trial version www.adultpdf.com
Trang 8DECISION-MAKING FACTORS
1 Active patient with multiple focal chondral
defects with limited alternatives to ACI,
especially because of the concomitant
symp-tomatic trochlear defect
2 Despite a mild varus deformity, the presence
of lateral compartment disease led to the
decision to avoid osteotomy
3 Shallow osteochondral lesion of the lateral femoral condyle amenable to single-stage ACI without bone grafting
4 Failure of two prior attempts at standard drilling and chondroplasty
5 Comphant patient willing to tolerate a prolonged rehabilitation period with a desire to return to high-level activities if possible
This is trial version www.adultpdf.com
Trang 9PATHOLOGY
Traumatic patellar instability with focal chondral defect of the patella
TREATMENT
Autologous chondrocyte implantation of the patella with distal realignment
(Note that the use of ACI for the patella is considered off-label usage, but was
indicated and performed with explicit patient and family informed consent
and under the guidance of an Institutional Review Board protocol allowing
prospective study of this patient at the author's institution.)
SUBMITTED BY
Brian J Cole, MD, MBA, Rush Cartilage Restoration Center, Rush
Univer-sity Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
CHIEF COMPLAINT AND
HISTORY OF PRESENT
ILLNESS
The patient is a 17-year-old female who initially
presented with a 3-year history of left knee
problems She first injured her knee while
playing basketball when she dislocated her
patella She complains of anterior left knee
pain, giving-way, catching of the patellofemoral
joint, and residual symptoms consistent with
patellar instability Her symptoms have been
getting progressively worse She rates her
overall knee function as being poor and states
that before her injury her knee was nearly
normal Previously, she had undergone an
arthroscopy during which a small
osteochon-dral lesion of the patella was noted A L5-cm
loose body was found and removed The loose
piece was derived from the patella, leaving a
full-thickness cartilage lesion of the patella
approximately 1.5 cm in diameter with minimal
bone loss At the time of loose body removal, a
lateral release was performed She underwent
extensive physical therapy, emphasizing a
patellofemoral rehabilitation program Before
this injury, she was a very active adolescent girl participating in multiple sports at her school At the time of presentation, she was unable to par-ticipate in any sports because of her significant knee-related complaints
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION Height, 5 ft, 2 in.; weight, 1051b The patient ambulates with a nonantalgic gait She stands
in approximately 4 degrees of symmetric mechanical-axis valgus She has a mild bilateral pronation deformity of both hindfeet She has
a moderate-sized joint effusion She has signif-icant patellar apprehension with two-quadrant laxity medially and three-quadrant laxity later-ally There is no excessive patellar tilt or sub-luxation when measured passively She has a positive J sign and a Q angle of 10 degrees She has crepitus with active flexion and extension with an audible and palpable catching sensation
of the patella at approximately 45 degrees of flexion The medial and lateral joint lines are not painful Her ligament examination is within normal Hmits
91
This is trial version www.adultpdf.com
Trang 10RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION
Plain radiographs revealed no significant
sub-chondral sclerosis or joint space narrowing, but
did reveal a definite central irregularity of the
patella best seen on the lateral view Merchant
views demonstrated the patella to be centered
within the trochlea There was no evidence
of trochlear hypoplasia Magnetic resonance
images demonstrate a central patellar chondral
defect with slight edema in the subchondral
bone in the region of the defect
SURGICAL INTERVENTION
The patient underwent her second left knee
arthroscopy during which a full-thickness
chon-dral defect was noted in the central aspect of
the patella measuring approximately 16 mm by
16 mm (Figure C27.1) At the same time, an
articular cartilage biopsy was performed with
the intention to perform autologous
chondro-cyte implantation (ACI) of the patella within 3
months of this intervention
Approximately 10 weeks later, the patient
underwent ACI through a lateral arthrotomy FIGURE 0212 Intraoperative photographs at the
time of autologous chondrocyte implantation proce-dure Patellar lesion before (A) and after (B) the periosteal patch is sewn in place
FIGURE C27.1 Arthroscopic photograph reveals
full-thickness chondral defect of the patella
measur-ing approximately 16 mm by 16 mm in diameter
centered over the lateral retinaculum (Figure C27.2) A concomitant distal realignment pro-cedure was also performed (Figure C27.3).The patellar defect was essentially central and cir-cular, measuring 16 mm by 16 mm with minimal bony involvement Postoperatively, she was made heel-touch weight bearing for approxi-mately 6 weeks until radiographs demonstrated evidence of healing of the distal realignment Although she was allowed to flex her knee daily
to 90 degrees, continuous passive motion was restricted to 45 to 60 degrees of flexion during its use for the first 6 postoperative weeks She advanced through the traditional rehabilitation protocol for ACI of the pateUa She was asked
This is trial version www.adultpdf.com