1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Báo cáo y học: "Biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction, cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis" pptx

10 423 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 10
Dung lượng 182,09 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

First, we compared biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction vascular cell adhesion molecule [VCAM]-1, intercellular adhesion molecule [ICAM]-1 and endothelial leucocyte adhesion molecule [E

Trang 1

Open Access

R634

Vol 7 No 3

Research article

Biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction, cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis

Patrick H Dessein1, Barry I Joffe2 and Sham Singh3

1 Department of Rheumatology, Johannesburg Hospital and Milpark Hospital, Parktown, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

2 Centre for Diabetes and Endocrinology, Houghton, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

3 Lancet Laboratories, Richmond, Johannesburg, South Africa

Corresponding author: Patrick H Dessein, Dessein@lancet.co.za

Received: 9 Jan 2005 Revisions requested: 24 Jan 2005 Revisions received: 2 Feb 2005 Accepted: 15 Feb 2005 Published: 24 Mar 2005

Arthritis Research & Therapy 2005, 7:R634-R643 (DOI 10.1186/ar1717)

This article is online at: http://arthritis-research.com/content/7/3/R634

© 2005 Dessein et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/

2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Cardiovascular event rates are markedly increased in

rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and RA atherogenesis remains poorly

understood The relative contributions of traditional and

nontraditional risk factors to cardiovascular disease in RA await

elucidation The present study comprises three components

First, we compared biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction

(vascular cell adhesion molecule [VCAM]-1, intercellular

adhesion molecule [ICAM]-1 and endothelial leucocyte

adhesion molecule [ELAM]-1) in 74 RA patients and 80 healthy

control individuals before and after controlling for traditional and

nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors, including

high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), IL-1, IL-6 and tumor

necrosis factor-α Second, we investigated the potential role of

an extensive range of patient characteristics in endothelial

dysfunction in the 74 RA patients Finally, we assessed

associations between biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and

ultrasonographically determined common carotid artery intima–

media thickness and plaque in RA The three biomarkers of

endothelial dysfunction, as well as hs-CRP, IL-1, IL-6 and tumor

necrosis factor-α, were higher in patients than in control

individuals (P < 0.0001) Patients were also older, exercised

less and had a greater waist circumference, blood pressure and

triglyceride levels (P ≤ 0.04) Five patients had diabetes

Differences in endothelial function were no longer significant

between patients and controls (P = 0.08) only after both

traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors were controlled for In the 74 RA patients, IL-6 predicted levels of all

three biomarkers (P ≤ 0.03), and rheumatoid factor titres and low glomerular filtration rate (GFR) both predicted levels of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, independent of traditional cardiovascular

risk factors (P ≤ 0.02) VCAM-1 was associated with common

carotid artery intima–media thickness (P = 0.02) and plaque (P

= 0.04) in RA Patients had impaired endothelial function, less favourable traditional cardiovascular risk factor profiles, and higher circulating concentrations of hs-CRP and cytokines compared with healthy control individuals Both traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors contributed to the differences in endothelial function between RA patients and healthy control individuals IL-6, rheumatoid factor titres and low GFR were independently predictive of endothelial dysfunction in

RA Disease-modifying agents that effectively suppress both cytokine and rheumatoid factor production, and interventions aimed at preserving renal function may attenuate cardiovascular risk in RA

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease is an increasingly recognized

contrib-utor to excess morbidity and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis

(RA) [1-5] Traditional cardiovascular risk factors do not

ade-quately accunt for the extent of cardiovascular disease in RA

[3,5] Although hypertension and age are potential additional

contributors to cardiovascular events in this disease [6],

mark-ers of current and cumulative inflammation (white cell counts and radiographic joint damage, respectively) are associated with ultrasonographically determined subclinical atherosclero-sis [7,8] – a predictor of cardiovascular events [9]

Atherosclerosis often develops subclinically over prolonged periods of time; therefore, it may be too insensitive to show

CCA = common carotid artery; DMARD = disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; ELAM = endothelial leucocyte adhesion molecule; GFR = glomer-ular filtration rate; hs-CRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; ICAM = intercellglomer-ular adhesion molecule; IL = interleukin; IMT = intima–media

thick-ness; RA = rheumatoid arthritis; TNF = tumour necrosis factor; VCAM = vascular cell adhesion molecule.

Trang 2

associations with recently acquired or temporarily active

mod-ifiable cardiovascular risk factors, such as systemic

inflamma-tion secondary to recent onset or uncontrolled RA Clearly,

other outcome variables that can identify patients at risk for

cardiovascular disease at any point in time are needed in RA

One such potential marker is endothelial dysfunction – an

essential step in atherogenesis [10] Most if not all risk factors

that are related to cardiovascular disease are also associated

with endothelial dysfunction, and the process is reversible with

effective treatment of operative risk factors [10] Endothelial

status may be regarded as an integrated index of all

athero-genic and atheroprotective factors present in an individual

[10]

Several methods have been employed to assess endothelial

function Using ultrasonographically measured brachial artery

flow mediated dilatation or vasodilatory responses to

intrabra-chial artery infusion of acetylcholine, some [11-14] but not all

investigators [15] have shown impaired endothelial function in

RA Endothelial dysfunction was related to inflammation [12]

and HLA-DR1 [11], and was found to improve with infliximab

treatment [13] An alternative method to assess endothelial

function involves the measurement of biomarkers of

endothe-lial activation and dysfunction (circulating vascular cell

adhe-sion molecule [VCAM]-1, intercellular adheadhe-sion molecule

[ICAM]-1, and endothelial leucocyte adhesion molecule

[ELAM]-1 [or selectin]) [16-20] Elevated circulating adhesion

molecules are associated with cardiovascular risk factors [17]

and predict atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events

[18-20] The measurement of circulating adhesion molecules may

not add much predictive information to that provided by more

established risk factors in the general population [21] In

con-trast, it has been reported that such biomarkers play a more

important role than traditional risk factors in cardiovascular

dis-ease in RA [22,23] Important in this context is that high

circu-lating adhesion molecule levels may not only reflect synovial

inflammation but also indicate exposure of the systemic

vascu-lar endothelium to high circulating cytokine concentrations

[24]

To our knowledge, the relative impact of traditional versus

non-traditional cardiovascular risk factors on endothelial

dysfunc-tion as assessed using biomarkers has not been reported in

RA The present study comprises three components First, we

compared biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in 74 RA

patients and 80 healthy control individuals before and after

controlling for potential explanatory variables, including both

traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors

Sec-ond, we investigated in the 74 RA patients the potential role

played by an extensive range of patient characteristics in

endothelial dysfunction Finally, we assessed the association

between biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and

ultrasono-graphically determined common carotid artery (CCA) intima–

media thickness (IMT) and plaque [9]

Materials and methods

Biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in RA patients and healthy control individuals

Seventy-six consecutive patients who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA [25] were invited to participate Only two patients refused, and the remaining 74 were included Patients receiving lipid-lowering and antidia-betic medications were excluded The baseline clinical and routine laboratory characteristics of the included RA patients are reported elsewhere [26] Eighty-three individuals with no known diseases and who were not taking any medication agreed to act as controls These were friends, patient friends and laboratory staff Three of them were excluded because they were found to have impaired fasting glucose (plasma glu-cose >5.5 mmol/l); the remaining 80 were included in the study The study was approved by the Ethics Committees for Research on Human Subjects (Medical) of the University of the Witwatersrand and the Milpark Hospital

We recorded traditional cardiovascular risk factors in both RA patients and control individuals using previously reported methods (Table 1) [26] We also recorded the following non-traditional cardiovascular risk factors: circulating high-sensitiv-ity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), cytokines (IL-1, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α), cytokine suppressant therapy (dis-ease-modifying antirheumatic drug [DMARD] and prednisone use) and biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction (Tables 1 and 2) Blood sampling was performed on the same day that clini-cal data were recorded Fasting blood samples were taken between 08:00 and 10:00 hours All laboratory analyses except for assessments of cytokines and biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction were performed within 2 hours of sam-pling These comprised lipids, hs-CRP and other laboratory tests that were performed for the second component of the study, which was conducted in the RA patients only (see below) Blood samples drawn for determination of cytokines and biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction were stored at -70°C before laboratory testing Cytokines and adhesion mole-cules were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Hiss Diagnostics GmbH, Freiburg, Switzerland) The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation (respec-tively) were 5.1% and 8.6% for IL-1, 3.4% and 5.2% for IL-6, 6.9% and 7.4% for TNF-α, 3.1% and 5.2% for VCAM-1, 4.1% and 7.7% for ICAM-1, and 5.4% and 6.0% for ELAM-1

Statistical analysis

The traditional and nontraditional risk factors were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test (continuous variables) and the χ2 test (dichotomous variables; Table 1) Apart from hs-CRP, cytokines and cytokine suppressant therapy (DMARD and glucocorticoid use), several traditional cardiovascular risk factors differed between RA patients and control individuals The ability of traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors to account for differences in the levels of biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction between RA patients and control

Trang 3

individuals was assessed in logistic regression models (Table

2), using RA status as the dependent variable (RA = 1,

non-RA control = 0) Continuous variables that were not normally

distributed were logarithmically transformed P < 0.05 was

considered statistically significant

Relationship between patient characteristics and

biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in RA patients

For the second component of the study, recorded variables

other than cytokines and biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction

are summarized in Tables 3 and 4 A descriptive analysis of

these variables in the current cohort was previously reported

[26] Although 10 patients were on thyroxine replacement therapy and eight had subclinical hypothyroidism (thyrotropin

>4 µIU/ml and normal thyroxine levels) [27], none had clinical hypothyroidism (decreased thyroxine levels) at the time of the study IgM rheumatoid factor was determined using an immu-noturbidimetric test on the Olympus AU 600 analyzer The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation for rheuma-toid factor were 3.4% and 4.6%, respectively

Statistical analysis

Associations between patient characteristics and biomarkers

of endothelial dysfunction were first assessed by univariate

Table 1

Cardiovascular risk factors in RA patients and control individuals

Traditional risk factors

Nontraditional risk factors

Cytokine suppressant therapy

Results are expressed as median (range) unless indicated otherwise Data were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U-test (continuous variables)

or the χ 2 test (dichotomous variables) DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; HDL, high-density

lipoprotein; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL, interleukin; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TNF, tumour

necrosis factor.

Trang 4

analyses comprising the Spearman correlation coefficients

(continuous variables; Table 3) and the Mann–Whitney U-test

(dichotomous variables; Table 4) Because many univariate

analyses were conducted in this component of the study, P <

0.01 was considered statistically significant Because IL-6,

rheumatoid factor and low glomerular filtration rate (GFR)

were associated with biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction,

their potential roles as predictors of endothelial dysfunction

were further assessed after controlling for traditional

cardio-vascular risk factors in multivariable regression models (Table

5) Continuous variables that were not normally distributed

were logarithmically transformed In these multivariable

mod-els, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Associations between biomarkers of endothelial

dysfunction and common carotid artery intima–media

thickness and plaque in RA patients

The CCAs were evaluated using high resolution B-mode

ultra-sound Details of this investigation in the present cohort were

previously reported [26]

Statistical analysis

The associations between biomarkers of endothelial

dysfunc-tion and CCA IMT and plaque were determined using the

Spearman correlation coefficient and the Mann–Whitney U

test, respectively P < 0.05 was considered statistically

significant

Results

Biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in RA patients

and healthy control individuals

The recorded baseline characteristics in the RA patients and

control individuals comprised traditional cardiovascular risk

factors, hs-CRP and cytokines (Table 1) RA patients were

younger, exercised less, had a higher waist circumference,

higher systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and higher

trig-lyceride levels than did control individuals Five RA patients

had diabetes that was being treated with dietary intervention

only With regard to nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors,

hs-CRP, IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations were higher in

patients than in control individuals, and DMARD and pred-nisone were used by 56 and 11 RA patients, respectively No patient was being treated or had been treated with biological agents at the time of the study

Results for biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in patients and control individuals are shown in Table 2 In univariate anal-ysis, all three biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction (VCAM-1, ICAM-1 and ECAM-1) were higher in patients than in control individuals These differences remained significant after con-trolling for cytokine suppressant agent (DMARD and pred-nisone) use (model 1) or traditional cardiovascular risk factors (model 2) After controlling for nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors, the differences in ELAM-1 between patients and control individuals were no longer significant (model 3) When traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors were simultaneously controlled for, the differences in levels of all three biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction were no longer significant between patients and control individuals (model 4)

Relationship between patient characteristics and biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in RA patients

In univariate analysis, VCAM-1 was related to rheumatoid fac-tor titres and low GFR, ICAM-1 to rheumatoid facfac-tor titres and IL-6, and ELAM-1 to IL-6 (Table 4) None of the other recorded baseline characteristics in the 74 RA patients were associated with biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction (Tables 4 and 5)

After controlling for traditional cardiovascular risk factors in multivariable regression models, IL-6 was predictive of all three biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction, and rheumatoid factor titre and low GFR were both predictive of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 (Table 5) Additional controlling for thyrotropin levels did not materially alter these models (data not shown)

Associations between biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and common carotid artery intima–media thickness and plaque in RA patients

As previously reported, the median (range) CCA IMT was 0.654 mm (0.496–1.150 mm), and 23 (31%) patients had

Biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in rheumatoid arthritis patients and control individuals

Model 1 a Model 2 b Model 3 c Model 4 d

VCAM-1 (pg/ml) 506 (253–1067) 747 (391–2077) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.08 ICAM-1 (pg/ml) 231 (82–857) 366 (135–993) <0.0001 0.0002 <0.0001 0.0005 0.08

Results are expressed as median (range) Unadjusted comparisons were done using the Mann–Whitney U-test and adjustments for potentially explanatory variables were made using logistic regression models a Adjusted for disease-modifying antirheumatic drug and prednisone use

b Adjusted for traditional risk factors (age; sex; race; smoking, alcohol and exercising status; diabetes; waist; systolic blood pressure; total cholesterol; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; triglycerides) c Adjusted for nontraditional risk factors (high sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin IL-1, IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor- α ) d Adjusted for traditional and nontraditional risk factors ELAM, endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule; ICAM, intercellular adhesion molecule; VCAM, vascular adhesion molecule.

Trang 5

Table 3

Spearman correlations among biomarkers and potential cardiovascular risk factors

Demographic

Lifestyle

Systemic inflammation

Disease severity

Cytokines

Drug therapy

Current prednisone dose

(mg/day)

Cumulative prednisone dose

(mg)

Metabolic syndrome

Others

Trang 6

plaque [26] Twenty-one (28%) patients had a CCA IMT under

0.600 mm and no plaque The role of clinical and routine

lab-oratory characteristics as predictors of common carotid

atherosclerosis in the present cohort was also previously

reported [26] VCAM-1 concentrations correlated with the

CCA IMT (rs = 0.280; P = 0.016) and were higher in patients

with plaque than in those without plaque (769 pg/ml [391–

2073 pg/ml] versus 703 pg/ml [445–2001 pg/ml]; P =

0.043) The associations between CCA findings and other

biomarkers did not achieve statistical significance

Discussion

Biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in RA patients

and healthy control individuals

We found that biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction were

markedly higher in RA patients than in healthy control

individ-uals Increased circulating adhesion molecule concentrations

have been reported in RA [23,24,28,29] Our patients also

had higher hs-CRP and IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations

than did control individuals, but these nontraditional

cardiovas-cular risk factors did not fully account for the differences in

biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction between patients and

control individuals Indeed, the RA patients also had generally

less favourable traditional cardiovascular risk factor profiles

than healthy control individuals

The younger age of the healthy control individuals included

reflects the difficulties in recruiting healthy aged persons who

are not taking any medication Hence, we controlled for age as

well as other traditional cardiovascular risk factors when

assessing the differences in biomarkers of endothelial

dys-function between patients and control individuals Of interest,

the body mass indices were similar in both groups, but

patients had higher waist circumference, blood pressure and

triglyceride levels The latter are features of the metabolic

syn-drome [5,30] Although differences in age and exercise habits

might have contributed to these findings, features of the met-abolic syndrome also cluster in RA because of inflammation-induced insulin resistance [5,30]

In multivariable models, traditional cardiovascular risk factors attenuated the differences in biomarkers of endothelial dys-function between patients and control individuals to a lesser extent than did nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors How-ever, the differences in endothelial function between patients and control individuals were no longer significant only after both traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors had been controlled for Our results also show the need for comprehensive assessment of cardiovascular risk factors in healthy individuals when comparing their endothelial function with that in RA patients

Relationship between patient characteristics and biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in RA patients

We investigated the potential role of an extensive range of patient characteristics in endothelial dysfunction in RA IL-6, rheumatoid factor titre and low GFR predicted endothelial dys-function, as assessed using biomarkers

In multivariable analysis, IL-6 predicted endothelial dysfunction independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors Chronic cytokine release from inflamed joints was previously implicated

in the increased production of adhesion molecules by endothelial cells in RA [4,31] Circulating cytokines could impair endothelial function directly [4] or through their effects

on insulin sensitivity and on CRP and fibrinogen (a major deter-minant of erythrocyte sedimentation rate [32]) production by the liver [4] In the present cohort of unselected RA patients, IL-6 was more strongly associated with endothelial dysfunc-tion than were CRP, erythrocyte sedimentadysfunc-tion rate and insulin resistance In contrast to IL-6, circulating IL-1 and TNF-α con-centrations were not associated with endothelial dysfunction

Polymorphonuclear cells

(×10 6 /l)

Urinary albumin/creatinine

(mg/mmol)

DBP, diastolic blood pressure; ELAM, endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; ICAM, intercellular adhesion molecule; IL, interleukin; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MP, methylprednisolone; QUICKI, Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TNF, tumour

necrosis factor; VCAM, vascular adhesion molecule *P 0.01; **P < 0.006.

Spearman correlations among biomarkers and potential cardiovascular risk factors

Trang 7

IL-1 and TNF-α are major proinflammatory cytokines in RA

joints and stimulate IL-6 production by synovial fibroblasts

[33-37], whereas IL-6 is a major circulating cytokine in RA that

induces the acute phase response, production of

immu-noglobulins by B cells and neuroendocrine alterations

[33,34,37,38] IL-6 promotes adhesion molecule expression

and stimulates macrophages to secrete monocyte

chemotac-tic protein-1 [39] Circulating IL-6 concentrations also predict

cardiovascular disease in the general population, independent

of hs-CRP levels [39]

Apart from IL-6, rheumatoid factor was also predictive of endothelial dysfunction independent of traditional cardiovas-cular risk factors in the present cohort The mechanism under-lying the strong association between rheumatoid factor and endothelial dysfunction in RA cannot be discerned from our

Table 4

Number of patients and biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction by sex, race, diabetes and medications used

Sex

Race

Diabetes

COX-2 inhibitor use

Traditional NSAID use

Aspirin use

Oestrogen use

DMARD use

Prednisone use

Antihypertensive agent use

Results for biomarkers are expressed as median (range) Data were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test No comparisons were significant at

P ≤ 0.01 COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; ELAM, endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule; ICAM,

intercellular adhesion molecule; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; VCAM, vascular adhesion molecule.

Trang 8

data However, rheumatoid factor may directly cause

endothe-lial injury [31] Direct evidence for a role for humoral immunity

in atherosclerosis was found by George and coworkers [40]

In their study repeated intraperitoneal administration of IgG

from serum of mice immunized with heat shock protein 65

enhanced fatty streak formation in mice in comparison with

their control anti-bovine serum albumin injected littermates

[40] Rheumatoid factor is produced by B cells that are highly

effective at presenting antigens to T cells [41] and T-cell

acti-vation in rheumatoid synovium is B-cell dependent [42] The

recently reported remarkable efficacy of B-cell depletion in

rheumatoid factor positive RA with rituximab [43] indicates

that B cells are key contributors to the immunopathogenesis

of RA In a recent autopsy report on two RA patients with

cor-onary artery disease the corcor-onary plaques and adventitia

con-tained large numbers of B cells, whereas in coronary artery

disease it is typical for lymphocytic infiltrates to consist almost

exclusively of T cells [44] These reports and our findings

sup-port a role for humoral mechanisms in RA atherogenesis

Finally, a low GFR also predicted endothelial dysfunction in

our RA patients Although only four (5%) patients had an

ele-vated serum creatinine (>115 µmol/l), GFR estimation using

the Cockcroft–Gault equation [45] revealed that 16 (22%)

patients had a GFR under 60 ml/min [26], which is indicative

of chronic kidney disease The high prevalence of

cardiovascular disease in individuals with chronic kidney

dis-ease has been amply reported [45] This is attributable to the

high prevalence of traditional risk factors such as older age,

high total cholesterol, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

and diabetes, as well as to nontraditional risk factors such as

oxidant stress, inflammation and, to a lesser extent,

hyperho-mocysteinaemia In the present cohort, varimax rotated factor

analysis confirmed strong relationships between low GFR,

age and hyperhomocysteinaemia [26] Also, independent of

age as well as other traditional cardiovascular risk factors, a

low GFR remained independently predictive of endothelial

dysfunction in our patients whereas hs-CRP was not

associ-ated with circulating adhesion molecules In support of an

important role of oxidant stress in cardiovascular disease

com-plicating chronic kidney disease, both vitamin E 800 U daily and acetylcysteine 600 mg twice daily were shown to decrease cardiovascular events in randomized controlled trials

in haemodialysis patients [45] Whether such interventions could decrease cardiovascular disease in RA may deserve fur-ther study

Associations between biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and common carotid artery intima–media thickness and plaque in RA patients

In a previous study conducted by Wallberg-Jonsson and cow-orkes [23] in 39 RA patients, ICAM-1 and selectin concentra-tions were found to be related to ultrasonographically detected CCA and femoral artery plaque as well as to haemo-static factors of endothelial origin We found that VCAM-1 was associated with ultrasonographically determined CCA IMT and plaque Taken together, these data further support the contention that circulating adhesion molecules are linked to cardiovascular disease in RA

Study limitations

We assessed cardiovascular risk comprehensively and our results are in keeping with previously reported paradigms of cardiovascular disease in RA [4,5,31] However, our findings must be reproduced in a longitudinal study and investigations

of a larger cohort is likely to reveal more independent associa-tions between biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and car-diovascular risk factors

Conclusion

We found that the biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction VCAM-1, ICAM-1 and ELAM-1 were higher in 74 RA patients than in 80 healthy control individuals In multivariable regres-sion models these differences could be accounted for by non-traditional cardiovascular risk factors (high hs-CRP, IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α) and unfavourable traditional cardiovascular risk factor profiles in RA patients IL-6, rheumatoid factor titre and low GFR predicted endothelial dysfunction, as assessed by biomarkers, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk fac-tor in the 74 RA patients VCAM-1 was associated with CCA

Partial correlation coefficients between IL-6, rheumatoid factor and glomerular filtration rate, and biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in rheumatoid arthritis patients

a The correlation coefficients shown are controlled for traditional risk factors (age; sex; race; smoking, alcohol and exercising status; diabetes; waist; systolic blood pressure; total cholesterol; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; triglycerides) in multivariable regression models ELAM, endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; ICAM, intercellular adhesion molecule; IL, interleukin; VCAM, vascular adhesion molecule.

Trang 9

atherosclerosis in RA Those DMARDs that are most effective

at suppressing both cytokine and rheumatoid factor

produc-tion may also be most effective in protecting against

cardio-vascular disease in RA In addition, interventions aimed at

preserving renal function may need to be considered in

cardi-ovascular disease prevention in RA

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests

Authors' contributions

PD conceived the study, collected the data, performed the

sta-tistical analysis and drafted the manuscript BJ participated in

the study design, interpretation of the data and drafting the

manuscript SS conducted the immunoassays

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr Milton Tobias for reading the radiographs, and Ms

Belinda Stevens for carrying out the ultrasonographic carotid artery

eval-uations The study was supported in part by the South African

Circula-tory Disorders Research Fund.

References

1 Solomon DH, Karlson EW, Rimm EB, Cannuscio CC, Mandl LA,

Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC: Cardiovascular morbidity

and mortality in women diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis.

Circulation 2003, 107:1303-1307.

2. Wolfe F, Freundlich B, Straus WL: Increase in cardiovascular

and cerebrovascular disease prevalence in rheumatoid

arthritis J Rheumatol 2003, 30:36-40.

3 del Rincon ID, Williams K, Stern MP, Freeman GL, Escalante A:

High incidence of cardiovascular events in a rheumatoid

arthritis cohort not explained by traditional cardiac risk factors.

Arthritis Rheum 2001, 44:2737-2745.

4. Sattar N, McCarey DW, Capell H, McInnes IB: Explaining how

'high-grade' systemic inflammation accelerates vascular risk

in rheumatoid arthritis Circulation 2003, 108:2957-2963.

5. Dessein PH, Joffe BI, Stanwix AE: Inflammation, insulin

resist-ance, and aberrant lipid metabolism as cardiovascular risk

fac-tors in rheumatoid arthritis J Rheumatol 2003, 30:1403-1405.

6. Wallberg-Jonsson S, Ohman ML, Dahlqvist SR: Cardiovascular

morbidity and mortality in patients with seropositive

rheuma-toid arthritis in Northern Sweden J Rheumatol 1997,

24:445-451.

7 Kumeda Y, Inaba M, Goto H, Nagata M, Henmi Y, Furumitsu Y,

Ishimura E, Inui K, Yutani Y, Miki T, Shoji T, Nishizawa Y: Increased

thickness of the arterial intima-media detected by

ultrasonog-raphy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Arthritis Rheum

2002, 46:1489-1497.

8 Nagata-Sakurai M, Inaba M, Goto H, Kumeda y, Furumitsu Y, Inui

K, Koyama H, Emoto M, Ishimura E, Shoji T, Nishizawa Y:

Inflam-mation and bone resorption as independent factors of

accel-erated arterial wall thickening in patients with rheumatoid

arthritis Arthritis Rheum 2003, 48:3061-3067.

9 Belcaro G, Nicolaides AN, Ramaswami G, Cesarone MR, De

Sanctis M, Incandela L, Ferrari P, Geroulakos G, Barsotti A, Griffin

M, et al.: Carotid and femoral ultrasound morphology

screen-ing and cardiovascular events in low risk subjects: a 10-year

follow-up study (the CAFES-CAVES study (1)) Atherosclerosis

2001, 156:379-387.

10 Bonetti PO, Lerman LO, Lerman A: Endothelial dysfunction A

marker of atherosclerotic risk Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol

2003, 23:168-175.

11 Gonzalez-Juanatey C, Testa A, Garcia-Castelo A, Garcia-Porrua C,

Llorca J, Vidan J, Hajeer AH, Ollier WE, Mattey DL, Gonzalez-Gay

MA: HLA-DRB1 status affects endothelial function in treated

patients with rheumatoid arthritis Am J Med 2003,

114:647-652.

12 Vaudo G, Marchesi S, Gerli R, Allegrucci R, Giordano A, Siepi D,

Pirro M, Shoenfeld Y, Schillaci G, Mannarino E: Endothelial dys-function in young patients with rheumatoid arthritis and low

disease activity Ann Rheum Dis 2004, 63:31-35.

13 Hurlimann D, Forster A, Noll G, Enseleit F, Chenevard R, Distler O,

Bechir M, Spieker LE, Neidhart M, Michel BA, et al.: Anti-tumor

necrosis factor-alpha treatment improves endothelial function

in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Circulation 2002,

106:2184-2187.

14 Bergholm R, Leirisalo-Repo M, Vehkavaara S, Makimattila S,

Task-inen MR, Yki-JarvTask-inen H: Impaired responsiveness to NO in

newly diagnosed patients with rheumatoid arthritis Arterio-scler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002, 22:1637-1641.

15 Van Doornum S, McColl G, Jenkins A: Screening for

atheroscle-rosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Arthritis Rheum

2003, 48:72-80.

16 Meigs JB, Hu FB, Rifai N, Manson JE: Biomarkers of endothelial

dysfunction and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus JAMA 2004,

291:1978-1986.

17 Ponthieux A, Herbeth B, Droesch S, Haddy N, Lambert D, Visvikis

S: Biological determinants of serum ICAM-1, E-selectin, P-selectin and L-P-selectin levels in healthy subjects: the Stanislas

study Atherosclerosis 2004, 172:299-308.

18 Hwang S-J, Ballantyne CM, Sharrett AR, Smith LC, Davis CE,

Gotto AM Jr, Boerwinkle E: Circulating adhesion molecules VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin in carotid atherosclerosis and

incident coronary heart disease cases Circulation 1997,

96:4219-4225.

19 De Caterina R, Basta G, Lazzerini G, Dell'Omo G, Petrucci R,

Morale M, Carmassi F, Pedrinelli R: Soluble vascular cell adhe-sion molecule-1 as a biohumoral correlate of atherosclerosis.

Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997, 17:2646-2654.

20 O'Malley T, Ludlam CA, Riemermsa RA, Fox KA: Early increase in levels of soluble inter-cellular adhesion molecule-1

(sICAM-1): potential risk factor for the acute coronary syndromes Eur Heart J 2001, 22:1226-1234.

21 Malik I, Danesh J, Whincup P, Bhatia V, Papacosta O, Walker M,

Lennon L, Thomson A, Haskard D: Soluble adhesion molecules and prediction of coronary heart disease: a prospective study

and meta-analysis Lancet 2001, 358:971-976.

22 Solomon DH, Curhan GC, Rimm EB, Cannuscio CC, Karlson EW:

Cardiovascular risk factors in women with and without

rheu-matoid arthritis Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:3444-3449.

23 Wallberg-Jonsson S, Cvetkovic JT, Sundqvist KG, Lefvert AK,

Ran-tapaa-Dahlqvist S: Activation of the immune system and inflam-matory activity in relation to markers of atherothrombotic

disease and atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis J Rheumatol 2002, 29:875-882.

24 Cush JJ, Rothlein R, Lindsley HB, Mainolfi EA, Lipsky PE:

Increased levels of circulating intercellular adhesion molecule

1 in the sera of patients with rheumatoid arthritis Arthritis Rheum 1993, 36:1098-1102.

25 Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper

NS, Healey LA, Kaplan SR, Liang MH, Luthra HS: The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the

classifi-cation of rheumatoid arthritis Arthritis Rheum 1988,

31:315-324.

26 Dessein PH, Joffe BI, Veller MG, Stevens BA, Tobias M, Reddi K,

Stanwix AE: Traditional and non-traditional cardiovascular risk factors are associated with atherosclerosis in rheumatoid

arthritis J Rheumatol 2005, 32:435-442.

27 Dessein PH, Joffe BI, Stanwix AE: Subclinical hypothyroidism is

associated with insulin resistance in rheumatoid arthritis Thy-roid 2004, 14:443-446.

28 Veale DJ, Maple C, Kirk G, McLaren M, Belch JJ: Soluble cell adhesion molecules-P-selectin and ICAM-1, and disease activity in patients receiving sulphasalazine for active

rheuma-toid arthritis Scand J Rheumatol 1998, 27:296-299.

29 El M, Ashour S, Moustafa H, Ahmed I: Altered levels of soluble adhesion molecules in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

com-plicated by peripheral neuropathy J Rheumatol 2002,

29:57-61.

30 Dessein PH, Stanwix AE, Joffe BI: Cardiovascular risk in rheu-matoid arthritis versus osteoarthritis: acute phase response related decreased insulin sensitivity and high-density lipopro-tein cholesterol as well as clustering of metabolic syndrome

features in rheumatoid arthritis Arthritis Res 2002, 4:R5.

Trang 10

sis An extraarticular feature of rheumatoid arthritis? Arthritis Rheum 2002, 46:862-783.

32 Wolfe F: Comparative usefulness of C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in patients with rheumatoid

arthritis J Rheumatol 1997, 24:1477-1485.

33 Feldmann M, Brennan FM, Maini RN: Role of cytokines in

rheu-matoid arthritis Annu Rev Immunol 1996, 14:397-440.

34 Papanicolaou DA, Wilder RL, Manolagas SC, Chrousos GP: The

pathophysiologic roles of interleukin-6 in human disease Ann Intern Med 1998, 128:127-137.

35 Duff GW: Cytokines and acute phase proteins in rheumatoid

arthritis Scand J Rheumatol Suppl 1994, 100:9-19.

36 Ou LS, See LC, Wu CJ, Kao CC, Lin YL, Huang JL: Association between serum inflammatory cytokines and disease activity in

juvenile idiopathic arthritis Clin Rheumatol 2002, 21:52-56.

37 Maini RN, Feldman M: How does infliximab work in rheumatoid

arthritis? Arthritis Res 2002:22-28.

38 Barrera P, Boerbooms AM, Demacker PN, van de Putte LB, Gallati

H, van der Meer JW: Circulating concentrations and production

of cytokines and soluble receptors in rheumatoid arthritis

patients: effects of a single dose methotrexate Br J Rheumatol

1994, 33:1017-1024.

39 Rattazzi M, Puato M, Faggin E, Bertipaglia B, Zambon A, Pauletto

P: C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 in vascular disease:

cul-prits or passive bystanders? J Hypertens 2003, 21:1787-1803.

40 George J, Afek A, Gilburd B, Shoenfeld Y, Harats D: Cellular and humoral immune responses to heat shock protein 65 are both involved in promoting fatty-streak formation in LDL-receptor

deficient mice J Am Coll Cardiol 2001, 38:900-905.

41 Newkirk MM: Rheumatoid factors: what do they tell us? J Rheumatol 2002, 29:2034-2040.

42 Takemura S, Klimiuk PA, Braun A, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM: T cell

activation in rheumatoid synovium is B cell dependent J Immunol 2001, 167:4710-4718.

43 Edwards JC, Szczepariski L, Szechinski J, Filipowicz-Sosnowska

A, Emery P, Close DR, Stevens RM, Shaw T: Efficacy of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid

arthritis N Engl J Med 2004, 350:2572-2581.

44 Aubry MC, Riehle DL, Edwards WD, Maradit-Kremers H, Roger

VL, Sebo TJ, Gabriel SE: B-lymphocytes in plaque and adventi-tia of coronary arteries in two patients with rheumatoid arthri-tis and coronary atherosclerosis: preliminary observations.

Cardiovasc Pathol 2004, 13:233-236.

45 Sarnak MJ, Levey AS, Schoolwerth AC, Coresh J, Culleton B,

Hamm LL, McCullough PA, Kasiske BL, Kelepouris E, et al.:

Amer-ican Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention: Kidney disease as a risk

factor for development of cardiovascular disease Circulation

2003, 108:2154-2169.

Ngày đăng: 09/08/2014, 06:22

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm