Comparison of nitrogenase and nitrate reductaseactivities in two nitrogen-fixing tree species: black alder Alnus glutinosa and black locust Robinia pseudoacacia G.. Nitrogenase t’BI2ase
Trang 1Comparison of nitrogenase and nitrate reductase
activities in two nitrogen-fixing tree species:
black alder (Alnus glutinosa)
and black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia)
G Pizelle S Benamar F Boutekrabt G Thiéry
I Laboratoire de Physiologie Végétale et Forestibre, Facult6 c/es Sciences, BP 239, 54506
Vandœuvre-Iès-Nancy Cedex, and
2Physiologie V6g6tale, ENSAIA, 54500 !anda°wre-/e5-/B/ancy France
Introduction
Among the symbiotic nitrogen-fixing trees
of the temperate zone, black alder (Alnus
glutinosa, L Gaertn.) and black locust
(Robinia pseudoacacia L.) can be
re-garded as typical actinorhizal (frankial)
and leguminous (rhizobial) woody species,
respectively Important differences
be-tween both species concern their
biologi-cal, ecological and symbiotic
characteris-tics, and the greater amount of work
recently devoted to A glutinosa, which
likely prevails over R pseudoacacia on
the following grounds: ubiquity in Europe,
better sylvicultural qualities, absence of
spines and suckers, easier collection of
the nitrogen-fixing organs, attraction to the
more recently recognized actinorhizal
symbiosis (Tjepkema et al., 1986)
Never-theless, R pseudoacacia is also a tree of
interest both for its role as symbiont in
nitrogen fixation and for its potential value
as timber and wood fiber source (Moiroud
and Capellano, 1982; Turvey and
Smeth-urst, 1983); hence, our desire to progress
in understanding of its physiology.
In an extension of our work on nitrogen
nutrition of A glutinosa (e.g., Pizelle and
Thiéry, 1986), the present paper examines
the nitrogenase and nitrate reductase
ac-tivities, measured in vivo, in R
pseudoa-cacia and compares them with the data
from A glutino!;a.
Materials and IMethods
Plant material was harvested in the early afternoon from 1 ! 3-20 yr old black alders
natu-rally growing on sandy alluvium and from black locusts planted for about 10 yr on a sandy and stony bank; both sites were located on a
sili-ceous substrate in the Moselle valley near
Nancy
Nitrogenase (t’BI2ase) activity was assayed by the Creduction method on excised actino-rhizal lobes of alder and on excised nodules of
black locust Nitrate reductase (NR) activities
were assayed on 5 mm sections of small roots
(diameter 1 1 mrr!; 100 mg fresh tissue) and on
disks of young fully expanded leaves (diameter:
Trang 2disks) samples
vacuum infiltrated in 2.5 ml of 0.1 M NaK
phos-phate buffer, pH 7.5, with or without 0.05 M
KN0
After incubation for 1 h at 30°C in the
dark, 1.5 ml of incubation medium were cleared
by addition of 0.3 ml of 1 M Zn acetate and
cen-trifugation In the leaf NR assays, Triton X-100
was added (0.1%, v/v) to the incubation
medium and clearance of Zn acetate was not
necessary The nitrite concentrations of the NR
incubation media and soil nitrate content were
determined as described by Pizelle and Thi6ry
(1986)
Results
N
ase activity
In A glutinosa the enzyme activity started
earlier in spring and disappeared later in
than in R pseudoacacia During
the growing season, N ase activity of the
nodules of R pseudoacacia reached higher values than that of the actinorhizas
of A glutinosa (Fig 1 This difference
might be explained by the following
char-acteristics: most nodules of black locust
were less than 1 yr old with a large
vol-ume of inner tissues invaded by the active
bacteroids, whereas the alder actinorhizas included lobes of various ages (often more
than 1 yr old) with the tissues containing
the active vesicles of Frankia limited to the
subapical cortical region.
NR activity of the small roots
Root NR activity of both species did not
disappear in winter (Fig 2) The enzyme
Trang 3activity
relevant site showed higher values in A
glutinosa than in R pseudoacacia In
contrast with the alder roots, the roots of
hI
likely nitrate, since the NR activities measured with and
without KN0 in the incubation medium
were similar
.1 30
Trang 4At glutinosa site, higher
soil nitrate content and of enzyme activity
were measured during the growing
sea-son, but no significant correlation (r= =
0.25; n = 21 ) was found between these
parameters.
NR activity of the leaves
Previous experiments showed that the leaf
NR activity of field-grown A glutinosa was
high after bud opening in the spring, then
decreased during the growing season,
before disappearing at the leaf fall; the
presence of this NR activity was found to
be independent of the supply of nitrate to
the leaves via the xylem sap (Pizelle and
Thi6ry, 1977 ; 1986
From the present data (Table I), it
appears that field-grown R pseudoacacia
also had a notable leaf NR activity; the
values were lower in spring than in
sum-mer, unlike the pattern observed in A
glu-tinosa It is presently unknown whether
the variations of the leaf enzyme activity
were controlled by the nitrate supply under
field conditions However, assays using
young nodulated black locusts grown on
nutrient solution without nitrate showed an
increase of their leaf NR activity from
0.78 ± 0.16 to 3.23 ± 1.15 nmol N02 !mg-!
DW-h- (means of 4 samples ± SE) after 3
days of 4 mM NaNO supply.
Discussion and Conclusion
Though the age of the trees and the
na-ture or nitrate content of the soil differed between the respective sites of each
spe-cies, the present data reveal some char-acteristics of the in vivo N ase and NR
activities in field-grown A glutinosa and
R pseudoacacia.
N ase activity of the actinorhizas of A
glutinosa lasted longer but reached lower values than that of the nodules of R
pseudoacacia during the growing season.
These differences are probably related to the length of the period of active photo-synthesis and to the anatomical structure
of the nitrogen-fixing organs in each spe-cies Since N ase activity is measured per
mg dry weight of actinorhiza or nodule, further data, such as the mass of
symbio-tic organs per tree, would be necessary to
compare the nitrogen-fixing potential of the trees of both species.
The presence of a root NR activity in winter indicates the persistence of the
enzyme and reducing power in the roots
out of the growing season Since nitrate
was found in the soil, even in winter, it
might suffice to maintain a nitrate-indu-cible NR activity in the roots throughout
the year The presence of non-reduced nitrate in the roots of R pseudoacacia, in
spite of a low nitrate content in the soil, indicates a limited root NR activity in this
Trang 5species glutinosa, negligible
accumulation of nitrate in the roots and
the absence of a close correlation
bet-ween root NR activity and soil nitrate
content suggest that the roots have an NR
capacity able to reduce higher amounts of
nitrate than those available in the soil
The seasonal profile of the leaf NR
ac-tivity of A glutinosa appears to be
inde-pendent of the nitrate supply; it decreases
from the early leaf expansion to the
approach of the leaf fall In R
pseudoa-cacia the leaf NR activity shows a different
profile with values lower in spring and
higher in summer Given the results
ob-tained from young laboratory-grown plants
as well as the presence of a limited
ni-trate-reducing capacity of the roots, it can
be proposed that the leaves of R
pseu-doacacia have an NR activity
commensu-rate with their supply of nitrate
Moiroud A & Capellano A (1982) Le robinier, Robinia pseudoacacia L., une espbce fixatrice d’azote int6ressante ? Ann Sci For 39,
407-418
Pizelle G & Thiéry G (1977) Variations saison-nieres des activites nitrogenase et nitrate reductase chez I’aune glutineux (Alnus
glutino-sa L Gaertn.) Pl 1 ysiol Veg 15, 333-342 Pizelle G & Thièry G (1986) Reduction of
ni-trate in the perennial tissues of aerial parts of Alnus glutinosa Phys;b/ Plant 68, 347-352
Tjepkema J.D., Schwintzer C.R & Benson D.R.
(1986) Physiology of actinorhizal nodules Annu Reu Plant Physiol 37, 209-232
Turvey N.D & Smethurst P.J (1983) Nitrogen
fixing plants in forest plantation In: Biological
Nitrogen Fixation in Forest Ecosystems: Foun-dations and Applications (Gordon J.C & Wheeler C.T., eds.), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp 233-260