In general, theories of lance refer to the systematic accounts of how observers maintain their focus of attention vigi-i.e., the selective aspects of perception that function to help an
Trang 1cally in perception) See also
CARPEN-TERED-WORLD HYPOTHESIS;
SCIOUSNESS, PHENOMENON OF;
CON-STRUCTIVIST THEORY OF
PERCEP-TION; EMPIRICIST VERSUS NATIVIST
THEORIES; PERCEPTION (I GENERAL),
THEORIES OF; PERCEPTION (II
COM-PARATIVE APPRAISAL), THEORIES OF
REFERENCES
Helmholtz, H von (1856-1866) Physiological
optics Leipzig: Voss
Wundt, W (1862) Beitrage zur theorie der
sinneswahrnehmung Leipzig:
Wun-ter’sck
Freud, S (1915) The unconscious In The
standard edition of the complete
psychological works of Sigmund
Freud London: Hogarth Press
Hochberg, J (1994) Unconscious inference
In R J Corsini (Ed.), Encyclopedia
of psychology New York: Wiley
Chalmers, D (1996) The conscious mind: In
search of a fundamental theory
New York: Oxford University Press
UNCONSCIOUS
MEMORY/UNCON-SCIOUSNESS THEORY See
FORGET-TING/MEMORY, THEORIES OF; FREUD’S
THEORY OF PERSONALITY;
UNCON-SCIOUS INFERENCE, DOCTRINE OF
UNDERSTIMULATION THEORY See
PSYCHOPATHOLGY, THEORIES OF
UNDULATORY THEORY See VISION/
SIGHT, THEORIES OF
UNIFIED THEORY OF COGNITION See
PROBLEM-SOLVING AND CREATIVITY
STAGE THEORIES
UNIFIED THEORY OF SOCIAL
PSY-CHOLOGY See INFORMATION
INTE-GRATION THEORY
UNIFORMITY OF NATURE THEORY
See FINAL THEORY
UNIFYING THEORY OF
DEVELOP-MENT See DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY
UNILINEAL/UNILINEAR THEORY See
RECAPITULATION THEORY/LAW
UNIT HYPOTHESIS See
GENERALIZA-TION, PRINCIPLES OF
UNIVERSALISM, DOCTRINE OF See
MIND/MENTAL STATES, THEORIES OF
UNIVERSALISTIC THEORIES See
WORK/CAREER/OCCUPATION, RIES OF
THEO-UNIVERSAL LAW OF TION The American psychologist/cognitive
GENERALIZA-scientist Roger N Shepard (1929- ) proposed
a universal law of generalization for
psycho-logical science that attempts to advance a principle in psychology that is comparable in generality to the English physicist and mathematician Sir Isaac Newton’s (1642-
1727) universal law of gravitation in physics
The new law is based on the assumption that because any object or situation experienced by
an individual is unlikely to recur in exactly the same form and context, psychology’s first
general law should be a law of generalization
Historically, learning theorists supposed that a
principle of conditioning (via the mechanisms
of reinforcement and/or contiguity) could be
the primary principle, and where what is
learned then generalizes to new situations (left
open for later formulation) could be a dary principle Over 2,000 years ago, the
secon-Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322 B.C.)
recognized - via his principle of association
by resemblance - that similarity is
fundamen-tal to menfundamen-tal processes, but it was not until the beginning and middle of the 20th century that experimental investigations were conducted
on the issue of generalization/similarity of
stimuli - first by Ivan Pavlov in the 1920s; then by Norman Guttman, H I Kalish, and Roger N Shepard in the 1950s; cf., Mostofsky (1965) Shepard suggests that humans general-
ize from one situation to another not because
they cannot tell the difference between the two situations, but because they judge that the situations are likely to belong to a set of situa-
tions having the same consequences alization - that arises from uncertainty about
Gener-the distribution of consequential stimuli in
Trang 2“psychological space” - is to be distinguished
from failure of discrimination - that arises
from uncertainty about the relative locations
of individual stimuli in that space
Accord-ingly, in his universal law of generalization
for psychological science, Shepard posits the
notion of a “psychological space” for any set
of stimuli by determining metric distances
between the stimuli such that the probability
that a response learned to any stimulus will
generalize to any other is an invariant
mono-tonic function of the distance between them
This probability of generalization, to a good
approximation, decays exponentially with this
distance, and does so in accordance with one
of two metrics, depending on the relation
be-tween the dimensions along which the stimuli
vary Shepard asserts that these empirical
regularities are mathematically derivable from
universal principles of natural phenomena and
probabilistic geometry that may – via
evolu-tionary internalization - tend to govern the
behaviors of all sentient organisms Shepard
suggests that psychological science
undoubt-edly has lagged behind physical science by at
least 300 years and, just as likely, predictions
of behavior may never attain the precision for
animate bodies/entities that it has for celestial
bodies However, psychology inherently may
not be limited merely to the descriptive
char-acterization of the behaviors of particular
terrestrial species, but possibly - behind the
diverse behaviors of humans and animals, as
behind the various motions of planets and
stars - one may eventually discern the
opera-tion of universal laws See also
ASSOCIA-TION, LAWS/PRINCIPLES OF;
GENER-ALIZATION, PRINCIPLES OF
REFERENCES
Newton, I (1687) Philosophiae naturalis
principia mathematica London:
Royal Society
Mostofsky, D I (Ed.) (1965) Stimulus
gen-eralization Stanford, CA: Stanford
University Press
Shepard, R N (1987) Toward a universal
law of generalization for
psycho-logical science Science, 237,
1317-1323
UNIVERSAL LAW OF GRAVITATION
See UNIVERSAL LAW OF TION
GENERALIZA-UNIVERSAL MODEL OF HUMAN EMOTIONS The American neurologist/
physician Antonio R Damasio (1994)
devel-oped a universal model of human emotions
that is based on a rejection of the Cartesian
mind-body dualism, and is founded on
neuro-psychological studies and experiments The model begins with the assumption that human knowledge consists of dispositional represen-tations stored in the brain (where “thought” is the process by which such representations are ordered and manipulated) One of the repre-sentations is of the body as a whole and is based on information from the endocrine and peripheral nervous systems In his model,
Damasio defines emotion as the combination
of a mental evaluative process (simple or complex) with dispositional responses to that process, resulting in an emotional body state - but also toward the brain itself (e.g., via neu-rotransmitter nuclei in the brain stem) In dis-tinguishing “emotions” from “feelings,” Damasio states that the brain is continually monitoring changes in the body, and suggests that people “feel” an emotion when they ex-perience such changes in juxtaposition to the mental images that initiated the cycle The model distinguishes, also, between “primary emotions” (innate) and “secondary emotions” (feelings allowing one to form systematic connections between categories of objects and situations) Damasio suggests that the neuro-logical mechanisms of emotion and feeling evolved in humans in order to create strong biases to situationally-appropriate behaviors that do not require conscious thought; he ar-gues that the time-consuming process of ra-tional thought may decrease one’s chances of survival in situations that require instant deci-sions See also EMOTIONS, THEORIES/ LAWS OF; MIND-BODY THEORIES
REFERENCE
Damasio, A R (1994) Descartes’ error:
Emotion, reason, and the human brain New York: Putnam
Trang 3UNLEARNING HYPOTHESIS See
IN-TERFERENCE THEORIES
UNREADINESS, LAW OF See
READI-NESS, LAW OF
UNREALISTIC OPTIMISM EFFECT
This phenomenon, and its related aspects,
studied by the American psychologists
Freder-ick Hansen Lund (1894-1965), Albert Hadley
Cantril (1906-1969), and Neil David
Weinstein (1945- ), among others, refers to a
judgmental bias in humans that tends to
influ-ence their subjective estimates of the
likeli-hood of certain future events in their own lives
as compared to others, especially their peers
For example, the unrealistic optimism effect
demonstrates that people overestimate the
likelihood in their lives of positive/desirable
events (e.g., the possibility of their living to be
older than 80 years of age), and underestimate
the likelihood in their lives of
negative/unde-sirable events (e.g., the possibility of having a
heart attack before they are 50 years old)
Studies on this issue indicate that cognitive,
motivational, and social factors such as degree
of desirability, perceived probability, personal
experience, ego-centrism, perceived
control-lability, and stereotype salience all tend to
affect the amount of optimistic bias evoked by
different possible events in people’s lives See
also DECISION-MAKING THEORIES;
OVERCONFIDENCE EFFECT
REFERENCES
Lund, F H (1925) The psychology of belief
Journal of Abnormal and Social
Psychology, 20, 63-81, 174-195
Cantril, A H (1938) The predicton of social
events Journal of Abnormal and
Social Psychology, 33, 364-389
Weinstein, N D (1980) Unrealistic optimism
about future life events Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology,
USE, LAW OF This principle is one of the
corollaries of the American psychologist
Ed-ward Lee Thorndike’s (1874-1949) law of exercise, which states that behaviors, stimu-
lus-response connections, and functions that are exercised, rehearsed, or practiced are strengthened as compared to those behaviors, bonds, or functions that are not used Some early writers held that the repeated use of a stimulus-response connection unit (neurons) bring about certain synaptic changes that made the passage of the nerve impulse more rapid in the future For example, in 1926 A Gates called this native capacity of nervous
structure modifiability the law of modification
by exercise or, more simply, the law of use [cf., the use/disuse, use-inheritance theory
advanced by the French naturalist/evolutionist Jean-Baptiste Pierre Antoine de Monet La-marck (1744-1829), which holds that the structural or functional changes in organs
brought about by their use or disuse are passed
onto the progeny) The notion of a cal change in nervous structure during the practice (use) of stimulus-response connec-tions anticipated the Canadian psychologist Donald Olding Hebb’s (1904-1985) later con-ceptualizations in perception and learning of
physiologi-cell assembly and phase sequence, where
groups of neurons are functionally interrelated and organized into a complex “closed circuit” created by repeated stimulation of those units See also DISUSE, LAW/THEORY OF; EF-FECT, LAW OF; EXERCISE, LAW OF; FREQUENCY, LAW OF; HEBB’S THEORY
OF PERCEPTUAL LEARNING; MARCK’S THEORY
LA-REFERENCES
Thorndike, E L (1898) Animal intelligence
New York: Macmillan
Gates, A (1926) Elementary psychology
New York: Macmillan
Trowbridge, M., & Cason, H (1932) An
ex-perimental study of Thorndike’s
theory of learning Journal of eral Psychology, 7, 245-258 Hebb, D O (1947) Organization of behavior
Gen-New York: Wiley
Trang 4Hebb, D O (1972) Textbook of psychology
Philadelphia, PA: Saunders
US-VERSUS-THEM EFFECT See
IN-GROUP BIAS THEORIES; PREJUDICE, THEORIES OF
UTERINE THEORY See
PSYCHOPA-THOLOGY, THEORIES OF
UTILITARIANISM, THEORY OF See
REFLEX ARC THEORY/CONCEPT
UTILITY THEORY See
DECISION-MAKING THEORIES; ELICITED VING RATE HYPOTHESIS; EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY; HEDONISM, THE-ORY/LAW OF; LOGAN’S MICROMOLAR THEORY
OBSER-UZNADZE/DELBOEUF ILLUSIONS See
APPENDIX A
Trang 5VALENCE-INSTRUMENTALITY-EX-PECTANCY THEORY See
WORK/CAR-EER/OCCUPATION, THEORIES OF
VALIDITY/RELIABILITY See
NOMO-LOGICAL NETWORK THEORY
VALUE THEORY See
DECISION-MAK-ING THEORIES; MEINONG’S THEORIES
VANDENBERGH EFFECT See
OLFAC-TION/SMELL, THEORIES OF
VASCULAR THEORY See NAFE’S
THEORY OF CUTANEOUS SENSITIVITY
VEATCH’S THEORY OF HUMOR This
humor theory, proposed by Thomas C Veatch
(1998), states that humor is characterized fully
by certain conditions that individually are
necessary, and are jointly sufficient, for the
humor experience to occur The conditions of
Veatch’s theory of humor involve a subjective
state of apparent emotional absurdity where
the perceived situation is viewed as normal
and where, simultaneously, some affective
commitment of the perceiver (to the way
something in the situation ought to be) is
vali-dated Thus, according to this approach,
hu-mor occurs when one views a situation
simul-taneously as being normal, as well as
consti-tuting a violation of the “subjective moral
order” where such an order is defined as the
set of principles to which the person both has
an affective commitment and a belief that he
or she ought to hold those principles Veatch
explores the logical properties and empirical
consequences of his theory, reviews the
widely-recognized aspects and features of
humor (e.g., incongruity, surprise, aggression,
emotional transformation), suggests practical
applications of his theory, and accounts for a
wide variety of biological, tional, and other categories/classes of humor-related phenomena See also HUMOR, THE-ORIES OF; INCONGRUITY/INCONSIS-TENCY THEORIES OF HUMOR; SUR-PRISE THEORIES OF HUMOR
social-communica-REFERENCE
Veatch, T C (1998) A theory of humor
mor: International Journal of mor Research, 11, 161-215
Hu-VENABLE’S COLOR VISION THEORY
See COLOR VISION, THEORIES/LAWS
VERBAL DEPRIVATION HYPOTHESIS
See CHOMSKY’S PSYCHOLINGUISTIC THEORY
VERBAL LOOP HYPOTHESIS See
CHOMSKY’S PSYCHOLINGUISTIC ORY
THE-VERBAL TRANSFORMATION EFFECT
See APPENDIX A
VIBRATION/VIBRATIONAL THEORY
See OLFACTION/SMELL, THEORIES OF
VIBRATORY THEORY OF ANCE See MENDEL’S LAWS/PRIN-
INHERIT-CIPLES
VICARIOUS BRAIN PROCESS POTHESIS See LASHLEY’S THEORY VICTIM PRECIPITATION HYPOTHE- SIS See LOMBROSIAN THEORY
HY-VIERORDT’S LAW OF TIME TION See VIERORDT’S LAWS
ESTIMA-VIERORDT’S LAWS There are two
sepa-rate usages or versions subsumed under the
same eponymic principle called Vierordt’s law, both of which are attributable to the
Trang 6German physiologist Karl von Vierordt
(1818-1884) One usage is related to the study of
sensory thresholds, and the other usage refers
to the area of time perception In the first case,
Vierordt’s law is the proposition that the more
moveable a part of the body is, the lower is
the two-point threshold of the skin over it
Thus, the two-point threshold decreases (i.e.,
increased tactile acuity) as one goes from the
acromion/shoulder blade to the tips of the
fingers In other terms, Vierordt’s law of
out-ward mobility in the area of sensory
psychol-ogy states that tactile acuity increases with
increased mobility of body members
How-ever, although Vierordt’s outward mobility
law appears to be true, generally, for the upper
extremity, it is not as clearly applicable to
various other body areas (cf., Greenspan &
Bolanowski, 1996) In the second case,
Vierordt’s law of time estimation is the
princi-ple that short temporal intervals tend to be
overestimated and long temporal intervals
tend to be underestimated Also, in this
con-text of time perception/estimation, the concept
of the in-difference interval is defined as the
intermediate length of time that is neither
underestimated nor overestimated Based on
this early general law of time estimation by
Vierordt in the late 1800s, subsequent
re-search in the area of the psychology of time
has determined that the overestimation of
short durations and the underestimation of
long ones is as valid for “filled”
tions/intervals as for “empty”
dura-tions/intervals Thus, in turn, and ground-ed in
Vierordt’s law of time estimation,
psycholo-gists today study the effect of the different
forms of “filling” a temporal interval (ranging
from the use of short, discrete auditory tones
to long, more continuous and meaningful
nar-ratives/events/materials) on one’s perceived
duration and estimation of time See also
FRAISSE’S THEORY OF TIME;
GUY-AU’S THEORY OF TIME; SOMESTHESIS,
THEORIES OF; TIME, THEORIES OF
REFERENCES
Vierordt, K von (1868) Der zeitsinn nach
versuchen Tubingen, Germany: H
Laupp
Vierordt, K von (1870) Abhangigkeit der
ausbildung des raumsinnes der haut
von den beweglichkeit der
korpert-heile Zeitschrift fur Biologie, 6,
53-72
Greenspan, J D., & Bolanowski, S J (1996)
The psychophysics of tactile tion and its peripheral physiological
percep-basis In L Kruger (Ed.), Pain and touch San Diego, CA: Academic
Press
VIGILANCE, THEORIES OF = sustained
attention theories In general, theories of lance refer to the systematic accounts of how observers maintain their focus of attention
vigi-(i.e., the selective aspects of perception that function to help an organism focus on certain features of the environment to the exclusion of other features) and remain alert to stimuli over
prolonged periods of time [i.e., sustained tention; cf., the law of prior entry - the princi-
at-ple that if a participant is attending to one of two possible stimuli and, if they occur simul-taneously, the one to which he/she is attending
tends to be perceived as having occurred fore the other; in social/personality psychol- ogy, this is called the prior entry effect where
be-the first impression(s) one has of anobe-ther son tend to be the dominate one(s) and are not easily changed by further acquaintance; cf.,
per-also, laws of attention (Woodworth, 1921): selection - of two or more inconsistent re-
sponses to the same situation, only one is
made at the same time; advantage - one of the
alternative responses has an initial advantage over the others due to such factors as intensity and change in the stimulus, or to habits of
reaction; shifting - the response that has the
initial advantage loses its advantage shortly and an alternative response is made, provided
the situation remains the same (cf., the law of shifting, proposed by the American psycholo-
gist Edward Lee Thorndike, which states that
it is relatively easy to elicit a response that an organism is capable of performing in any situation - and to which it is sensitive - and, thereby, form an association between the re-
sponse and the features of that situation); dency - a predisposition when aroused to ac-
ten-tivity facilitates responses that are in its line
and inhibits others; and combination - a single
response may be made to two or more stimuli, and two or more stimuli may arouse a single
joint response] The various specific theories
Trang 7and models of vigilance attempt to deal with
certain common questions in an observer’s
behavior during a vigilance task: How is
back-ground information stored? How are decisions
made during observation? and How do neural
attention units function? A sampling of the
vigilance theories and some of their major
tenets are: expectancy theory - observers act
as “temporal averaging instruments” who
form expectancies as to the approximate time
course of critical signal appearances on the
basis of samples of signal input; readiness to
detect a signal is assumed to be positively
related to level of expectancy; elicited
observ-ing rate hypothesis - the observer constantly
makes sequential decisions about whether or
not to emit observing responses toward the
display that is monitored; detection failures
occur when the participant does not emit the
observing responses due to fatigue or low
motivation or does so in an imperfect fashion;
signal detection theory - the decrement
func-tion typically found in a vigilance task reflects
a shift to a more conservative response
crite-rion and decision process, rather than a
de-cline in alertness or perceptual sensitivity to
signals; activation/arousal theory - instead of
a “cognitive” appraisal of vigilance, this
ap-proach emphasizes a neurophysiological
ex-planation whereby sensory input has two
gen-eral functions: to convey information about
the environment and to “tone up” the brain
with a background of diffuse activity that
helps cortical transmission via increased
alert-ness; this orientation suggests that the
mo-notonous aspects of vigilance tasks reduce the
level of nonspecific activity that is necessary
to maintain continued alertness and,
conse-quently, lead to a decline in the efficiency of
signal detection; and habituation theory -
habituation is a lessening of neural
respon-siveness due to repeated stimulation and is an
“active process of inhibition;” this approach
argues that the degree of neural habituation in
a given task is directly related to the frequency
of stimulus presentation so that with the
de-velopment of habituation the observer’s
abil-ity to discriminate critical signals is degraded,
attention to the task becomes increasingly
more difficult, and performance declines over
a period of time; this theory holds that
ha-bituation accumulates more rapidly at fast,
than at slow, rates and results in a decline in performance at fast stimulus/event rates The
current status of vigilance theories is that each
model focuses on a somewhat different aspect
of the sustained attention situation, even though many theories can account for similar data To date, the task remains of synthesizing the various theoretical positions of vigilance into a unified framework where stronger “law-ful” cause-effect statements may be provided See also ACTIVATION/AROUSAL THE-ORY; ATTENTION, LAWS/PRINCIPLES OF; ELICITED OBSERVING RATE HY-POTHESIS; HABITUATION, PRINCIPLE/ LAW OF; IMPRESSION FORMATION, THEORIES OF; REINFORCEMENT, THORNDIKE’S THEORY OF; SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY
REFERENCES
Woodworth, R S (1921) Psychology: A
study of mental life New York:
Holt
Deese, J (1955) Some problems in the theory
of vigilance Psychological Review,
62, 359-368
Baker, C (1963) Further toward a theory of
vigilance In D Buckner & J
McGrath (Eds.), Vigilance: A posium New York: McGraw-Hill Davies, D., & Tune, G (1969) Human vigi-
sym-lance performance New York:
American Elsevier
Mackworth, J (1969) Vigilance and
habitua-tion Baltimore: Penguin Books Stroh, C (1971) Vigilance: The problem of
sustained attention New York:
Per-gamon
Mackie, R (Ed.) (1977) Vigilance: Theory,
operational performance, and iological correlates New York:
phys-Plenum
Parasuraman, R., & Davies, D (1989)
Varie-ties of attention Orlando, FL:
Trang 8VISION/SIGHT, THEORIES OF One of
the earliest theories that attempted to describe
a mechanism for human vision was proposed
by the Greek mathematician/mystic
Pythagor-as (c 582-507 B.C.) He Pythagor-asserted that rays of
light sprang from the eyes themselves, much
like twin spotlights; somehow, the light
strik-ing objects in front of the observer triggered a
reaction in the eye, and vision was the result
However, by the 15th century, Pythagoras’
theory was reversed, where the eyes were
considered the receivers, not senders, of light
By that time, some of the greatest scientists of
the say began to investigate the question of
light’s influence on the eye For example,
Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519) made detailed
drawings of the eye’s anatomy; Johannes
Ke-pler (1571-1630) formulated the basic laws of
light refraction, which explained how light
rays can be bent as they travel from one
me-dium to another; and Rene Descartes
(1596-1650) conducted studies concerning the
appli-cation of these refraction laws to the structural
features of the eye, which led to a basic
under-standing of how the eye focused incoming
light [cf., Maxwellian view - named after the
Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell
(1831-1879), refers to the elimination of light
fluctuations entering the eye due to pupil size
fluctuations by concentrating light coming off
an object by the use of a spherical, or
“fish-eye,” lens to focus light in the pupil’s plane]
By 1666, Sir Isaac Newton’s (1642-1727)
experiments on the composition of light itself
was the formal beginning of inquiries into the
physical nature of light as well as inquiries
into the way the eye interprets color
phenom-ena [cf., the inverse square law - the principle
that the intensity of a stimulus that reaches the
receptor from a distant source varies inversely
as the square of the distance of the source
from the receptor (Note: In the context of
inferential statistics, the inverse square law is
the principle that the sampling error tends to
be inversely proportional to the square root of
the sample size); the law of illumination - the
principle that the illumination upon a surface
varies directly as the luminous intensity of the
light source, inversely as the square of its
distance, and directly as the cosine of the
an-gle made by the light rays with the
perpen-dicular to the surface; and the Arago
phe-nomenon - named after the French astronomer
and physicist Francois Arago (1786-1853), is the relative insensitivity to light of the very center of the visual field at very low levels of
illumination] According to modern vision theory, the stimulus for the sensory modality
of vision/sight is electromagnetic radiation (light) between approximately 380 and 740
nanometers (nm, where 1 nm = 1 billionth of a
meter), and where the initial processing of visual information is the receptor system con-
sisting of photosensitive cells (rods and cones)
in the retina of the eye Vision is the process
of transforming (“transducing”) physical light energy into biological neural impulses that can then be interpreted by the brain The electro-
magnetic radiation can vary in intensity ceived as a difference in brightness level) and wavelength (perceived as a difference in hue
(per-or “col(per-or”) The quantum the(per-ory of vision
maintains that light energy travels to the eye
in the form of discrete or discontinuous changes in energy where wavelength frequen-cies correspond to definite energies of the
light quanta called photons The Dutch
physi-cist Christiaan Huygens (1629-1693) first
proposed the undulatory theory, which forms
a part of the wave theory of light that planted the earlier corpuscular/particle the- ory The wave theory offers a ready explana-
sup-tion of interference, diffracsup-tion, and tion of light but fails to explain the interaction
polariza-of light with matter, the emission and tion of light, photoelectricity, and other phe-nomena These can be explained only by a
absorp-quasi-corpuscular theory involving packets of energy - light quanta or photons The quantum theory was introduced by the German physi-
cist Max Planck (1858-1947) in 1900 mately, it appears that two models are re-quired to explain the phenomenon of light
Ulti-According to the complementarity principle of
the Danish physicist Niels Bohr (1885-1962),
a system such as an electron can be described
either in terms of particles or in terms of wave motion Theories of vision are systematic at-
tempts to account for the various phenomena
of visual perception in relation to the known structure and functions of the visual organs Included by extension is the study of photore-ceptors; the action of nerves and nerve end-
ings [cf., Hering’s law of equal innervation -
Trang 9named after the German physiologist Karl
Ewald Hering (1834-1918), states that the
muscles of each eye always operate in
syn-chrony because they receive the same
innerva-tion; the study of responses to light in lower
organisms; the higher psychological
implica-tions of light, color, form, and their temporal
and spatial relations (cf., Harvey’s principle -
when a grating is viewed, the number of
verti-cal stripes per unit of total breath is
overesti-mated and the number of horizontal stripes is
underestimated; Leonardo’s paradox - named
after the Italian artist/scientist Leonardo da
Vinci (1452-1519), refers to da Vinci’s
asser-tion that it is not possible to reproduce via a
painting what a person sees binocularly,
be-cause in binocular vision, each eye sees
some-thing that the other eye does not see; Hering’s
law of identical visual direction - in binocular
vision, any pair of corresponding lines of
di-rection in objective space are represented by a
single line of direction in visual space; and the
superposition hypothesis - the binocular vision
of newborn infants blends together the
mo-nocular visual responses of the two eyes, even
when the visual stimulus evokes binocular
rivalry in adults, and suggests that such
blend-ing is replaced by binocular rivalry after the
development/emergence of stereopsis at about
age 8-12 weeks old (cf., Brown & Miracle,
2003) In his computational theory of vision,
the English psychologist David C Marr
(1945-1980) makes a formal analysis of
per-ception that is based on a theory of vision that
attempts to explain how the pattern of light
falling on the retinas of the eyes is
trans-formed into an internal representation of the
colors, shapes, and movements of what is
observed; three stages are involved in the
process: the “primal sketch,” the
“two-and-one-half dimensional sketch,” and the
“three-dimensional model” description The
ana-tomical and physiological basis for vision may
be hypothesized much as is the case for the
theories of color vision; for example, the
three-component Young-Helmholtz theory; the
antagonistic/opponent-process theory of
Her-ing; the Ladd-Franklin genetic theory; and the
von Kries duplicity theory The cone cells
(“daylight vision”) in the retina are
responsi-ble for chromatic/color vision and visual
acu-ity [cf., Charpentier’s law - named after the
French physician Augustin Charpentier 1916), states that in the retinal fovea, the product of the area of a stimulus and its inten-sity is constant for stimuli at threshold intensi-
(1852-ties; Charpentier bands - illusory black spokes
that may be seen when a black disk with a
white sector is rotated slowly; the blue-arc phenomenon - an effect produced by a stimu-
lus at the center of the visual field against a dark background; it consists of a pair of blu-ish, luminous arcs seen as connecting the stimulus with the locus of the blind spot; the
Troxler fading/effect - named after the
Swiss-German physician/philosopher Ignaz P V Troxler (1780-1866), is the fading of visual objects in the periphery of the visual field when a point in its center is steadily fixated; this is due to the organization of the peripheral retina, which requires larger eye movements than are needed in the fovea, to break the ad-aptation brought about by steady fixation; the
Ditchburn-Riggs effect - named after the
Eng-lish physicist Robert William Ditchburn (1903-1987) and the American psychologist Lorin A Riggs (1912- ), is the phenomenon
of the rapid cessation of the vision of contours when the image of the contours undergoes prolonged stabilization with respect to the
retina; and the Rayleigh equation - named
after the English physicist Lord J W S Rayleigh (1842-1919), is an index of one’s color vision given by the proportion of light from the red and green portions of the visible spectrum that need to be mixed to make a
standard yellow] The rod cells (“night-time
vision”) are sensitive to minute amounts of light but are not sensitive to colors (cf., Ka-
neko’s photochemical theory of vision)
Be-cause of the anatomical features of the visual
system, the left visual field is represented in the right occipital lobe of the brain, and the right visual field is represented in the left oc-
cipital lobe It is much easier to trace cally the visual pathway from the retina to the occipital lobes than it is to explain and under-stand how the eyes and the brain interact to
anatomi-produce the perception of vision (cf., mind’s eye theory - proposes an as-yet-unidentified
neurological structure located in the brain where visual information obtained from the two eyes or from long-term memory is stored temporarily while being processed as a visual
Trang 10image, allowing one to reason from visual
images; the Cheshire cat effect - relies on the
phenomenon of binocular rivalry, where each
eye has a different input from the same part of
the visual field, and where motion in the field
of one eye can cause either the entire image to
disappear or parts of the image to be erased;
the movement captures the brain’s attention
momentarily; this effect is named after the
Cheshire cat in Lewis Carroll’s “Alice’s
Ad-ventures in Wonderland” where the cat
van-ishes slowly, beginning with the end of its tail
and ending with its grin that remained some
time after the rest of the cat had disappeared)
More is known about how photochemical
processes and mechanisms operate in the rod
cells than about the cone cells In addition to
responding directly to light, the receptor cells
are affected, also, by the surrounding receptor
cells Studies have shown that there are both
inhibitory and excitatory effects when
neighboring receptor cells fire simultaneously
Other studies indicate that various cells in the
visual cortex are maximally activated by
ob-jects in the visual field with specific shapes, of
particular orientations, and moving in
particu-lar directions For instance, D Hubel and T
Wiesel hypothesize the existence of four
gen-eral types of hierarchically organized cells
(simple, complex, lower-order hypercomplex,
and upper-order hypercomplex), and this
no-tion has found anatomical support from other
research, but the theory that those cells are
arranged hierarchically is not yet supported
Over 100 years ago, the German physican and
psychologist Hermann Aubert (1826-1892)
provided a number of theoretical and lawful
propositions concerning visual acuity and
perception; cf., Listing’s law of visual
ac-commodation - named after the German
phy-sicist Johann Benedict Listing (1808-1882),
refers to the case where, if the eye moves from
a primary position to any other position, the
torsional rotation of the eyeball in the new
position is the same as it would be if the eye
had turned about a fixed axis, and lies at right
angles to the initial and final directions of the
line of regard; and Alexander’s law - named
after the Austrian otologist Gustav Alexander
(1873-1932), refers to nystagmus, produced
either by rotation or thermally, that can be
accentuated voluntarily by moving the eyes in
the direction of the jerky component of the nystagmus Among Aubert’s eponymous ref-
erents are the following: the Aubert-Fleischl paradox/phenomenon - named after Aubert
and the Austrian physiologist Marxow Ernst Fleischl (1846-1891), is a perceptual effect whereby a moving stimulus seems to move more slowly when the observer fixates on the stimulus than when she or he fixates on the
background; the Aubert-Forster phenomenon -
named after Aubert and the Polish-born man ophthalmologist Carl F R Forster (1825-1902), refers to the situation where two ob-jects of different physical sizes are placed at different distances from the observer such that both subtend the same number of degrees of visual arc, the physically closer one can be recognized over a greater area of the retina
Ger-than the physically more distant one; the bert phenomenon - refers to the case where a
Au-single vertical straight-line stimulus is sented to an observer, and the line is displaced perceptually as the observer tilts his/her head
pre-(cf., the Muller effect - named after the
Ger-man psychologist Georg Elias Muller 1934), refers to the case where an observer views a luminous vertical rod in the dark, and
(1850-it appears to be tilted out of vertical in the same direction as the head; this effect occurs
only with small tilts of the head); and the bert-Forster law - a generalization regarding visual acuity based on the Aubert-Forster phenomenon that states that objectively small
Au-objects can be distinguished as two at greater distances from the fovea than objectively lar-ger objects subtending the same visual angle
(cf., the Alice in Wonderland effect - is a
vis-ual defect where one sees things as smaller than they are in actuality; in a clinical context,
the Alice in Wonderland syndrome refers to
depersonalization and “Lilliputian tions,” that is, hallucinations involving objects that appear to be extremely small, derived
hallucina-from Jonathan Swift’s (1726) novel, ver’s Travels in which the imaginary country
Gulli-of Lilliput has inhabitants who are only six
inches tall; and associative/ geometric illusion
- a visual misperception in which one part of
an object or image is viewed erroneously due
to the effect of another object/image;
Appen-dix A provides a listing of various visual sions/effects) See also ADAPTATION,
Trang 11illu-PRINCIPLES/LAWS OF; ATTENTION,
LAWS/PRINCIPLES/ THEORIES OF;
COLOR VISION, THEORIES/LAWS OF;
DOPPLER EFFECT/PRIN-CIPLE/SHIFT;
IMAGERY/MENTAL IMAGERY,
THEO-RIES OF; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
THE-ORY; PERCEPTION (I GENERAL),
THEORIES OF; PERSONAL EQUATION
PHENOMENON; PURKINJE
EF-FECT/PHENOMENON/SHIFT
REFERENCES
Aubert, H (1865) Physiologie der netzhant
Breslau: Morgenstern
Aubert, H (1866) Die
bewegungsempfin-dung Archiv fur die Gesamte
Phy-siologie, 39, 347-370
Stratton, G M (1897) Vision without
inver-sion of the retinal image
Psych-ological Review, 4, 341-360
Luckiesh, M (1922/1965) Visual illusions:
Their causes, characteristics, and
applications New York: Van
Nostrand/Dover
Sharp, W L (1928) The floating-finger
illu-sion Psychological Review, 35,
171-173
Hartline, H., & Ratliff, F (1957) Inhibitory
interaction of receptor units in the
eye of limulus Journal of General
Physiology, 40, 357-376
Hubel, D., & Wiesel, T (1965) Receptive
fields and functional architecture in
two nonstriate visual areas (18 and
19) of the cat Journal of
Neuro-physiology, 28, 229-289
Kelly, J., & VanEssen, D (1974) Cell
struc-ture and function in the visual cortex
of the cat Journal of Physiology,
238, 515-547
Gregory, R (1978) Eye and brain: The
psy-chology of seeing New York:
McGraw-Hill
Kaneko, A (1979) Physiology of the retina
Annual Review of Neuroscience, 2,
169-191
Marr, D C (1982) Vision San Francisco: W
H Freeman
Bundesen, C (1991) A theory of visual
atten-tion Psychological Review, 97,
523-547
Harris, M., & Humphreys, G (1994)
Compu-tational theories of vision In A
Colman (Ed.), Companion pedia of psychology London: Rout-
encyclo-ledge
Crick, F., & Koch, C (1997) The problem of
consciousness In Scientific can (Special Issue), Mysteries of the mind Vol 7 No 1
Ameri-Brown, A., & Miracle, J (2003) Early
bin-ocular vision in human infants: Limitations on the generality of the
superposition hypothesis Vision search, 43, 1563-1574
VISUOSPATIAL SKETCHPAD OR SCRATCHPAD MODEL See WORKING
MEMORY, THEORY OF
VITAL FLUIDS THEORY See LIFE,
THEORIES OF
VITALISM THEORY See HOBBES’
PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; LIFE, ORIES OF; LOEB’S TROPISTIC THEORY; MECHANISTIC THEORY
THE-VITAMIN MODEL OF EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION See WORK/CAREER/
OCCUPATION, THEORIES OF
VIVIDNESS/CLEARNESS, LAW OF See
ASSOCIATION, LAWS/PRINCIPLES OF
VOLLEY/PERIODICITY THEORY AND VOLLEY PRINCIPLE See AUDITION/
HEARING, THEORIES OF
von DOMARUS PRINCIPLE See
SCHI-ZOPHRENIA, THEORIES OF
von FREY’S FOUR-ELEMENT
THEO-RY See SOMESTHESIS, THEORIES OF von KRIES’ COEFFICIENT LAW In the
context of the phenomenon of chromatic aptation (i.e., conditions where a colored
Trang 12ad-stimulus is viewed following adaptation to
another color and differs in appearance from
the same stimulus seen without pre-exposure
and, conversely, where numerous pairs of
colors that ordinarily differ may look alike
when they are viewed by eyes that have been
previously adapted to different kinds of light),
the von Kries coefficient law - named after the
German physiologist Johannes von Kries
(1853-1928) - states that the tri-stimulus
val-ues of all colors for one condition of
adapta-tion bear fixed ratios to the corresponding
tri-stimulus value for the visually equivalent
colors observed under another condition of
adaptation However, in one case, D L
Mac-Adam notes that his own experimental
hy-potheses - based on von Kries’ law - were not
supported Consequently, MacAdam
hypothe-sizes the existence of different receptors
whose responses are merged onto three
chan-nels in the nervous system: the so-called
“tri-chromatic mechanism.” See also
ADAPTA-TION, PRINCIPLES/LAWS OF; COLOR
VISION, THEORIES/LAWS OF; von
KRIES’ COLOR VISION THEORY; ZONE/
STAGE THEORIES OF COLOR VISION
REFERENCES
Kries, J von (1905) Die
gesichtsempfindun-gen In W Nagel (Ed.), Handbuch
der physiologisches menchens
Braunschweig: Vieweg
MacAdam, D L (1956) Chromatic
adapta-tion Journal of the Optical Society
of America, 46, 500-513
von KRIES’ COLOR VISION THEORY =
duplicity/duplexity theory The
duplicity/du-plexity theory of vision was first proposed by
Max Schultz in 1866, and later by H Parinaud
and the German physiologist Johannes von
Kries (1853-1928) The theory states that
vi-sion is mediated by two (“duplex”) classes of
retinal receptors, the cones that are
“chro-matic” and sensitive to color wavelengths and
used in high illumination (“photopic vision”),
and the rods that are “achromatic” and used in
low illumination (“scotopic vision”) Because
the two classes of receptors manifest different
wavelength relationships, the shape of a
spe-cific function that relates brightness to color
may be used to indicate whether rod or cone
vision is predominant in a given situation [cf.,
the Anglo-American psychologist William
McDougall’s (1871-1938) early color vision theory that states that there are two distinct
receptor mechanisms for light in the retina: rods for dim light and cones for normal and intense light; the theory holds, also, that all colors are reducible to the three basic colors of blues, greens, and reds] There are anatomical
differences between the rods and cones, even
though these two types of receptors are very similar: (1) the rods are smaller and seem to
be less highly developed than the cones; (2) there are no rods (only closely packed cones)
in the foveal area of the retina; (3) the cones have a better (“one-to-one”) supply of nerves; (4) the substance rhodopsin (“visual purple”)
is present in the rods but not in the cones; and (5) nocturnal animals possess mostly rods and
very few cones Today, the von Kries duplicity theory of vision is so well established that it
counts as a strong statement of fact See also COLOR VISION, THEORIES/LAWS OF; FOVEAL CONE HYPOTHESIS; von KRI-ES’ COEFFICIENT LAW
REFERENCES
Schultze, M (1866) Zur anatomie und
physi-ologie der retina Archiv der roskopische Anatomisch, 2, 175-
Mik-286
Kries, J von (1895) Uber die natur gewisser
mit den psychischen vorgangen
ver-knupfter gehirnzustande Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 8, 1-33
Parinaud, H (1898) La vision Paris: Octave
Doin
von KRIES’ DUPLICITY THEORY See
VISION/SIGHT, THEORIES OF; von KRIES’ COLOR VISION THEORY
von KRIES-SCHRODINGER ZONE ORY See COLOR VISION, THEO-
THE-RIES/LAWS OF
von RESTORFF EFFECT = Restorff
phe-nomenon/effect The German psychologist and physician Hedwig von Restorff (1906- ?) developed the generalization that if in a given series of stimuli to be learned (such as a list of words), one of them is made physically dis-tinctive in some way (e.g., printed in large type or in a different color from the others), it
Trang 13will be easier to learn and recall This
phe-nomenon, called the von Restorff effect, and
also known as the isolation effect and the
Koh-ler-Restorff phenomenon - named after the
German psychologist Wolfgang Kohler
(1887-1967) and H von Restorff, refers to the
ten-dency to remember unusual items better than
the more common items The experiments by
H von Restorff (1933) and W Kohler and H
von Restorff (1935) provided a trace theory
basis for the Gestalt psychologists to explain
the forgetting of material A trace regarding
learned materials may become distorted
through its interactions with a mass of related
traces similar to it Thus, “associative
interfer-ence” in forgetting experiments is related to
the material to be remembered Von Restorff
showed that part of the difficulty of learning a
list of syllables stems from their homogeneity:
they are all undistinguishable and equally
confusable with one another However, if one
item is perceptually distinguishable, then that
unique item will be remembered better than
the other items Kohler and von Restorff
con-ceived of the unique item as standing out like
a figure against a ground/ background of all
the homogeneous items Being thus
distin-guished, the trace laid down for the unique
item would be isolated from the traces of the
rest of the items and, therefore, would not be
distorted by interactions with those traces
Accounts of the von Restorff effect by
stimu-lus-response associationists have proceeded
along similar lines, using principles both of
stimulus generalization and associative
inter-ference See also ASSOCIATION,
LAWS/PRINCIPLES OF; ASSOCIATIVE
FACILITATION AND INTERFERENCE
EFFECTS; GENERALIZATION,
PRINCI-PLES OF; GESTALT THEORY/LAWS;
INTERFERENCE THEORIES OF
FOR-GETTING; TOP-DOWN PROCESSING/
THEORIES; TRACE THEORY/DOCTRINE
REFERENCES
Restorff, H von (1933) Analyse von
vorgan-gen im spurenfled I Uber die
wir-kung von bereichsbildungen im
spu-renfeld Psychologische Forschung,
18, 299-342
Kohler, W., & Restorff, H von (1935)
Ana-lyse von vorgangen im spurenfeld
II Zur theorie der reproduction
Psychologische Forschung, 21,
56-112
Jensen, A (1962) The von Restorff isolation
effect with minimal response
learn-ing Journal of Experimental chology, 64, 123-125
Trang 14Psy-W
WALLER’S LAW See
NEURON/NEUR-AL/NERVE THEORY
WANDERING WOMB THEORY See
PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, THEORIES OF
WARM/COLD EFFECT See
IMPRESS-ION FORMATIMPRESS-ION, THEORIES OF
WARM-UP EFFECT See PERCEPTION
(II COMPARATIVE APPRAISAL),
THEO-RIES OF; WOLPE’S
THEORY/TECHNI-QUE OF RECIPROCAL INHIBITION
WATERFALL ILLUSION/EFFECT See
APPENDIX A
WATSON’S THEORY See
BEHAVIOR-IST THEORY
WAVE THEORY OF LIGHT See VISION/
SIGHT, THEORIES OF
WEAK LAW OF EFFECT See EFFECT,
LAW OF
WEAR-AND-TEAR THEORIES OF
AG-ING See AGING, THEORIES OF
WEBER-FECHNER LAW See
FECHNER’S LAW
WEBER’S LAW = relativity law = Weber’s
fraction = Weber’s function = Weber’s ratio
The German physiologist/psychophysicist
Ernst Heinrich Weber (1795-1878) formulated
this psychophysical generalization that states
that the just-noticeable differences (or JNDs),
i.e., the differences between two stimuli that
are detected as often as they are undetected, in
stimuli are proportional to the magnitude of
the original stimulus Weber described the
relationship between existing stimulation and
changes in that stimulation in what historians
of psychology have called the first
quantita-tive law of psychology; cf., the quotient
hy-pothesis that is an interpretation of Weber’s law according to which the quotients/ratios of any two successive JNDs in a given sensory series are always equal; and Breton’s law,
which is a formula proposed by P Breton as a
substitute for Weber’s law, that posits a bolic relation between stimulus and JND In formal terms, Weber’s law states that ∆ I ⁄ I =
para-k, where I is the intensity of the comparison stimulus, ∆ I is the increment in intensity just detectable, and k is a constant The law holds
reasonably well for the mid-range of most stimulus dimensions but tends to break down when very low- or very high-intensity stimuli are used For instance, for very-low intensity
tones the Weber fraction is somewhat larger
than it is for moderately loud tones
Represen-tative values of the Weber ratio for the
inter-mediate range of some sensory dimensions are: brightness = 02 to 05; visual wave-length = 002 to 006; loudness = 1 to 2; auditory frequency = 002 to 035; taste (salt)
= 15 to 25; smell = 2 to 4; cutaneous sure = 14 to 16; and deep pressure = 01 to
pres-.03 The law of progression refers to a
formu-lation devised by the Belgian psychophysicist
J L R Delboeuf (1831-1896) as a partial
substitute for Weber’s law and states that
suc-cessive sensation increments increase by ithmetical progression when the correspond-ing stimulus-increments increase by geometric
ar-progression Delboeuf’s law of degradation, another partial substitute for Weber’s law,
states that a sensation is always strongest as it enters consciousness and from then on be-
comes less intense; and Delboeuf’s law of tension states that any change in external
stimuli produces a condition of rium/tension in the organism that constitutes the excitation whose conscious accompani-ment is the “sensation.” An indication of the
disequilib-enduring significance of Weber’s law is
pro-vided by Roeckelein (1996): in a random sample of 136 introductory psychology text-books published from 1885 through 1996,
Weber’s law is cited and described in over
60-percent of the books (an extremely high centage for all the laws found in this study), suggesting that it is one of the most popular and frequently cited laws in the psychological
per-literature E B Titchener mentions Weber’s law in more than 18 different contexts (e.g.,
Trang 15Weber’s law for affection, for auditory
sensa-tions, for cutaneous sensasensa-tions, for organic
sensations, etc.) in his textbook Weber’s law
has even been applied successfully to plants’
response systems (cf., Fuller, 1934) S Smith
and E R Guthrie mention only one law in
their textbook: Weber’s law See also
FECHNER’S LAW;
FULLERTON-CAT-TELL LAW; WUNDT’S THEORIES/
DOC-TRINES/PRINCIPLES
REFERENCES
Weber, E H (1834) De pulsu, resorptione,
auditu et tactu Leipzig: Koehler
Delboeuf, J R L (1883) Elements de
psy-chophysique Liege: (Publisher
un-known)
Gamble, E (1898) The applicability of
We-ber’s law to smell American
Jour-nal of Psychology, 10, 82-142
Titchener, E B (1907) An outline of
psychol-ogy New York: Macmillan
Smith, S., & Guthrie, E R (1924) General
psychology in terms of behavior
New York: Appleton
Yoshioka, J (1929) Weber’s law in the
dis-crimination of maze distance by the
white rat University of California
Publications in Psychology, 4,
155-184
Fuller, H (1934) Plant behavior Journal of
General Psychology, 11, 379-394
Roeckelein, J E (1996) Citation of laws and
theories in textbooks across 112
years of psychology Psychological
Reports, 79, 979-998
WEDENSKY INHIBITION/EFFECT See
SKINNER’S DESCRIPTIVE BEHAVIOR/
OPERANT CONDITIONING THEORY
WEISFELD’S
ADAPTIVE/EVOLUTION-ARY/ETHOLOGICAL HUMOR
THE-ORY.Classical evolutionary theory from the
discipline areas of anthropology,
sociobiol-ogy, and ethology is applied by G E Weisfeld
(1993) to the issue of the adaptive value of
humor Weisfeld’s evolutionary humor theory
proposes that humor evolved to induce the
individual to seek out informative social
stimulation and to reward others for providing
such information His approach distinguishes
the derivative effects of humor (such as group
solidarity, competition, courtship, and tion) from the fundamental adaptive value of
relaxa-humor Weisfeld’s theory does not rest on the
traditional assumptions of humor theory cerning tension-reduction/release or pleasure-seeking; his theory avoids group-selection reasoning and it addresses the fitness benefits
con-of the humorist as well as the laugher The theory accounts for the fact that laughter is a means of social influence, and it applies to
chimpanzees as well as humans Thus, feld’s humor theory recognizes both the moti-
Weis-vational and affective properties of humor, and not just its cognitive characteristics Weis-feld’s approach helps to explain why aggres-sive, sexual, and competitive content is par-ticularly funny, why a “playful mood” is nec-essary for humor appreciation, why intelligent and socially-competent children and adults tend to make good humorists, and why the
condition of incongruity is humorous feld’s adaptive theory of humor contains ele-
Weis-ments that are consistent with existing logical explanations for various “aesthetic” emotions (such as olfaction, music apprecia-tion, and visual art appreciation), and is simi-lar, also, to leading evolutionary explanations for the behavior of “interest.” See also DAR-WIN’S EVOLUTION THEORY; HUMOR, THEORIES OF; INCONGRUITY/INCON-SISTENCY THEORIES OF HUMOR; PID-DINGTON’S COMPENSATORY HUMOR THEORY; SOCIAL/COMMUNICATION THEORY OF LAUGHTER; SULLY’S THEORY OF LAUGHTER/HUMOR
bio-REFERENCE
Weisfeld, G E (1993) The adaptive value of
humor and laughter Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 141-169
WEISMANN’S THEORY = Weismannism
The German biologist August Friedrich pold Weismann (1834-1914) formulated a
Leo-theory of genetics that negates the principle
that acquired characteristics are inherited, and
postulated a continuity of germ plasm through
generations Weismann was a strong supporter
of Charles Darwin’s (1809-1882) theory of evolution In an attempt to disprove the idea of
acquired characteristics proposed by Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829), Weismann amputated the tails from mice during five
Trang 16Jean-successive generations and found that there
was no reduction in the propensity to grow
tails Weismann’s early work on the sex cells
and development of the Hydrozoa
(inverte-brate sea animals such as jellyfish, sea
anem-ones, hydroids) led him to develop his germ
plasm/continuity theory, which postulates that
the information required for the development
and final form of an organism must be
con-tained within the germ cells, the egg and
sperm (he located the germ plasm in what are
called today the chromosomes), and be
trans-mitted unchanged from generation to
genera-tion (cf., epigenetic theory - a universally
accepted notion that the development of an
embryo consists of the gradual differentiation
of the fertilized ovum and the separate
produc-tion/organization of structures and organs; this
approach contrasts with the theory of
prefor-mationism, or preformation, that is a
discred-ited theory stating that an embryo is fully
dif-ferentiated in the ovum or spermatozoon and
merely increases in size during development;
in a broader context, epigenetic theory
im-plies, also, that mind and consciousness
de-veloped unpredictably from living matter and
reached a high level of complexity in the
course of evolution; the theory also includes
the notion that new characteristics not
deter-mined by the original fertilized egg may
emerge in the process of embryonic
develop-ment, such as a pregnant woman listening to
classical music in order to influence her new
child’s intellectual level; cf.,
homunculus/sen-sory homunculus hypothesis - a “homunculus”
is a completely formed “minute/miniature
human figure” considered by some 16th- and
17th-century theorists to exist in the
spermato-zoon and to expand in size in the transitions
from zygote to embryo to infant to adult; this
notion is an example of preformism and
op-poses the epigenetic principle of cumulative
development and successive differentiation;
the homunculus hypothesis was advanced,
al-so, by the early Egyptians who held that a
little person resides inside each person’s skull
and where the homunculus - after looking out
through the person’s eyes and listening via the
person’s ears - reacts to the environment by
pulling strings to operate the person’s
mus-cles; in the sensory homunculus hypothesis, it
is suggested that the behavior of an organism
is controlled and regulated by a cognitive agent called the “homunculus” that is located within the individual’s brain and whose be-havior is just as complex as is the individual’s behavior that is being explained; in more re-
cent times, the homunculus is portrayed as a
“tiny, grotesque-looking man” whose distorted body parts indicate the relative sizes of their sensory projection areas in the somatosensory cortex; for example, the head, the hands –
especially the thumbs, and feet of the culus are grossly exaggerated in size to signify
homun-their relative importance and representations
in the somatosensory cortical regions) In
Weismann’s view, germ plasms give the tinuity from parent to offspring; all other cells
con-are merely a vehicle to convey the germ plasm, and it alone is, in a sense, immortal; other cells are destined to die Weismann also notes that some form of reduction division - that is now known to occur during meiosis -
must occur if the genetic material is not to double on each generation (cf., central dogma principle - the proposition that states that ge-
netic information is transferred from DNA to the proteins that it encodes, and not from pro-tein to DNA; that is, although genes can influ-ence the form of an organism’s body or its behavior, the form of the organism’s body or its behavior cannot influence its genes; and
genetic memory/storage theory - posits that
information from learning or experience may
be stored in a DNA or RNA molecule which,
in turn, may be inherited as part of a some) Weismann’s ideas are only broadly correct, but it is surprising that he was able in the 1880s to get so near the modern view He was wrong in his belief that the germ plasm is unalterable and immune to environmental effects, as others were to demonstrate later Weismann’s theories appeared originally in a series of essays, translated as “Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Biological Problems” (1889-1892), and his “Vortrage Uber Descen-denztheorie” (1902) was an important contri-
chromo-bution to evolutionary theory See also
DAR-WIN’S EVOLUTION THEORY; TON’S LAWS; HARDY-WEINBERG LAW; LAMARCK’S THEORY; MENDEL’S LAWS/PRINCIPLES
Trang 17Millar, D., Millar, I., Millar, J., & Millar, M
(1996) The Cambridge dictionary
of scientists New York: Cambridge
University Press
WELLS EFFECT The American
psycholo-gist Gary Leroy Wells (1950- ) suggests in
the Wells effect that individuals have a
reluc-tance to make judgments of legal liability
solely on the basis of “naked” statistical
evi-dence For example, evidence that is highly
reliable (say 80-percent) is sufficient to
per-suade most people, or to influence their
deci-sions, but “naked” statistical evidence (e.g.,
evidence having an 80-percent probability) is
not sufficient to persuade most people - even
though the actual mathematical probability is
the same in both instances (i.e., reliable
evi-dence versus statistical evievi-dence) See also
DECISION-MAKING THEORIES;
EX-PECTED UTILITY THEORY; TAXICAB
PROBLEM/EFFECT
REFERENCES
Wells, G L (1978) Applied eyewitness
tes-timony research: system variables
and estimator variables Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology,
36, 1546-1557
Wells, G L (1984) How adequate is human
intuition for judging eyewitness
tes-timony? In G L Wells & E F
Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony:
Psychological perspectives New
York: Cambridge University Press
Wells, G L (1993) What do we know about
eyewitness identification? American
Psychologist, 48, 553-571
Wells, G L., & Olson, E A (2003)
Eye-witness testimony Annual Review of
Psychology, 54, 277-295
WERNICKE-GESCHWIND THEORY
See MIND/MENTAL STATES, THEORIES
OF
WERTHEIMER’S PERCEPTUAL
THE-ORY See GESTALT THEORY/LAWS
WEVER-BRAY EFFECT See AUDITION/
HEARING, THEORIES OF
WHEATSTONE-PANUM LIMITING CASE See PANUM PHENOMENON/EF-
FECT
WHITTEN EFFECT See OLFACTION/
SMELL, THEORIES OF
WHORF-SAPIR
HYPOTHESIS/THEO-RY = Whorfian hypothesis = Whorf’s
hy-pothesis = linguistic relativity hyhy-pothesis = Sapir-Whorf hypothesis The American lin-guists and anthropologists Benjamin Lee Whorf (1897-1941) and Edward Sapir (1884-
1939) formulated the Whorf-Sapir linguistic hypothesis, which states that one’s language influences the nature of one’s perceptions and thoughts, and was first suggested by the Ger-
man ethnologist Wilhelm von Humboldt
(1767-1835) There are two forms of the guistic relativity hypothesis: a “weak” form
lin-(which argues that only perceptions are so influenced; e.g., an Eskimo’s perception of
snow is distinguishable from a non-Eskimo’s
because the former has many different words
in his/her vocabulary/language for different
variations in types of snow), and a “strong”
form (which asserts that abstract conceptual processes are so affected; e.g., the Hopi Indian
language handles time in a relativistic manner
as compared with the English language
break-down of time into “past,” “present,” and
“fu-ture”) Unfortunately, very little convincing
evidence supports completely the Whorf-Sapir hypothesis An early view of the relationship between language and thought was J B Wat- son’s (1878-1958) behaviorist approach that
asserted that one learns to talk in much the same way that other muscular skills (such as riding a bicycle) are learned, and when one subsequently makes the same muscular movements in a more hidden form (i.e., to oneself covertly rather than aloud or overtly),
it is called thought [cf., the motor theory of thinking/consciousness of E Jacobson (1932)
and L W Max (1935), which posits that tal images are accompanied by changes in the corresponding muscular area - such as the arm and eye regions of the body - for motor and
men-visual images, respectively; Flourens’ theory -
Trang 18named after the French physician Marie-Pierre
Jean Flourens (1794-1867), states that
think-ing depends on the functionthink-ing of the
cere-brum as a whole; the laws of thought - refer to
the three logical principles of identity,
contra-diction, and excluded middle, and are
consid-ered to be the basic principles of all reasoning;
and the law of participation - is a principle of
human primitive thinking, which asserts that
things that are similar are considered to be
identical] According to Watson, what
psy-chologists call thought is nothing but talking
to oneself (cf., the motor theory of speech
perception propounded by A M Liberman,
which holds that speech is assumed to be
per-ceived by an implicit, covert system that
“maps” the acoustic properties of the input
against a set of deep motor representations of
idealized articulation) However, Watson’s
extreme behaviorist view that thinking or
thought depends only on the implicit muscle
movements of speech has proven to be
inade-quate [cf., central theory of thinking - is the
proposition that the center of mentation is a
cerebral process located in the brain
(how-ever, curiously, Aristotle suggested that the
locus of thinking/thought is in the heart)]
Kinney’s law - named after the American
edu-cator Richard Kinney (1924-1979), relates to
temporal factors and behavioral/quantitative
aspects of speech deficiency in postnatally
developing deafness where the length of time
over which changes in speech develop is
di-rectly proportional to the length of time during
which normal speech has been present; and
the phonemic restoration phantom/effect -
refers to the generalization that a dramatically
altered acoustic element in speech is
ex-tremely difficult to detect, and where
replac-ing various speech sounds with others still
sounds like proper speech Other competing
theories concerning the relationship between
language and thought are: J Piaget’s cognitive
stage development theory, which emphasizes
the idea that language is a result/by-product of
a child’s advances in cognitive abilities,
par-ticularly the ability to symbolize that develops
at the end of infancy; and the Russian
devel-opmental psychologist Lev S Vygotsky’s
(1896-1934) and the Russian
neuropsycholo-gist Aleksandr R Luria’s (1902-1977)
linguis-tic theory that portrays language and thought
as developing together and aiding each other
in the process (cf., concept of pure meaning -
Vygotsky’s notion maintaining that “pure
meaning” is the final union of language and thought in adult reasoning; language and thought begin as independent processes, but
join together around the age of two years, and lead to the development of egocentric speech, inner speech, verbal thought, concept forma-tion and, ultimately, “pure meaning”) It is
suggested that the notion of linguistic ity (like most “large” theories in psychology)
relativ-is not the kind of theory that will ever be proven completely right or completely wrong; most likely, in the final analysis, it may be
proper to say that language differences ence people’s thoughts and perceptions in some ways, as well as, conversely, thoughts/ cognitions and perceptions influence one’s language in other ways (cf., cloak theory of language - holds that the structure of a lan-
influ-guage is a dependent function of the patterns
of thought embedded in the particular culture) See also BEHAVIORIST THEORY; CHOM-SKY’S PSYCHOLINGUISTIC THEORY; CONCEPT LEARNING/CONCEPT FOR-MATION, THEORIES OF; LANGUAGE ACQUISITION THEORY; LANGUAGE ORIGINS, THEORIES OF; PIAGET’S DE-VELOPMENTAL STAGES THEORY; SPEECH THEORIES; THOUGHT, LAWS
OF
REFERENCES
Watson, J B (1924) Behaviorism Chicago:
University of Chicago Press
Vygotsky, L S., & Luria, A R (1930)
Stud-ies in the history of behaviour
Cambridge, MA: M.I.T Press
Jacobson, E (1932) Electrophysiology of
mental activities American Journal
of Psychology, 44, 677-694
Vygotsky, L S (1934/1962) Thought and
language Cambridge, MA: M.I.T
Press
Max, L W (1935) An experimental study of
the motor theory of consciousness
Journal of Comparative Psychology,
19, 469-486
Piaget, J (1954) The construction of reality in
the child New York: Basic Books Whorf, B (1956) Language, thought, and
reality New York: Wiley
Trang 19Luria, A R (1968) The mind of a mnemonist
New York: Basic Books
Kay, P., & Kempton, W (1984) What is the
Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? American
Anthropologist, 86, 65-79
Hunt, E., & Agnoli, F (1991) The Whorfian
hypothesis: A cognitive psychology
perspective Psychological Review,
98, 377-389
WIFE/MISTRESS FIGURE See
APPEN-DIX A, RUBIN FIGURE/ILLUSION
WILD CHILD PHENOMENON See
KAS-PAR HAUSER EFFECT/EXPERIMENT
WILDER’S LAW OF INITIAL VALUE(S)
See INITIAL VALUE(S), LAW OF
WILLMER’S COLOR THEORY.The
British physiologist E N Willmer (dates
un-known) proposed a theory of color vision that
postulates three mechanisms in the retina:
cones, dark-adapting rods, and
non-dark-adapting rods Willmer’s color theory asserts
that color vision may be explained by the
rela-tive ratio of rods and cones at various
wave-lengths, and indicates that when a curve is
plotted to show the summation of rod and
cone responses at various wavelengths of the
visible spectrum, the curve has some affinity
to the well-known color triangle Thus,
Will-mer’s color theory was developed via analyses
of sensitivity to wavelengths and relates to
empirically-derived hue/color charts; the
the-ory also attempts to account for the
relation-ship of hue to intensity and with the
white-black phenomena in color vision Willmer
(1943) presents his theory, examines the
physiology of color vision, and discusses the
deficiencies in color-vision theory in the
jour-nal Nature (London) and, in the same issue of
the journal - in response to his article, K J W
Craik, H Hartridge, and A H S Holbourn
raise several objections to Willmer’s theory
Craik describes an experiment that
demon-strates that a hue match with yellow or green
is impossible when red and blue are used
within the photopic/scotopic ratios covering
the regions stated in Willmer’s theory, and
Craik also criticizes the theory concerning the
production of the “white sensation.” Hartridge
describes an experiment that fails to
corrobo-rate certain assumptions of Willmer’s theory,
namely, that strong stimulation of the rods and cones simultaneously would cause an appre-ciation of green, yellow, or orange, whereas weak stimulation of those receptors should result in the perception of violet, mauve, or
crimson Holbourn offers a criticism of mer’s theory by pointing out that any worka- ble color theory must have three independent variables, but Willmer’s theory only has two
Will-independent variables.See also COLOR SION, THEORIES/LAWS OF
VI-REFERENCES
Willmer, E N (1943) Physiology of colour
vision Nature (London), 151-152,
191, 213-215, 632-635
Willmer, E N (1946) Retinal structure and
colour vision: A restatement and an hypothesis Cambridge, UK: Cam-
bridge University Press
Willmer, E N (1950) Some aspects of
col-our-blindness British Medical nal, 2, 1141-1145
Jour-Giles, G H (1950) Colour vision: Some
re-cent trends in practice British nal of Physiological Optics, 7, 90-
Jour-95
Willmer, E N (1955) The physiology of
vision Annual Review of ogy, 17, 339-366.
Physiol-WINNER’S CURSE EFFECT See
DE-CISION-MAKING THEORIES
WITKIN’S ITY/COGNITIVE STYLE THEORY The
PERCEPTION/PERSONAL-American psychologist Herman A Witkin
(1916-1979) conducted research on cognitive styles in the 1940s, in particular on individual
differences in the perception of the upright in space An earlier approach toward understand-ing visual space perception, especially one related to the perception of rotation/movement
in space, was provided by the Austrian cist/philosopher Ernst Mach (1838-1916) in
physi-his theory of bodily rotation (also called the Mach-Breuer-Brown theory of labyrinthine functioning), where he suggested that the
sense organs for this experience are to be found in the semicircular canals of the inner
ear Mach’s theory, with some modification, is
Trang 20still prevalent today In Witkin’s theoretical
approach, when stationary visual and bodily
cues are placed in opposition, and one has to
judge whether an object is upright, some
per-sons are influenced more by the visual cues
(such individuals are called field-dependent),
whereas others depend more on bodily cues
(these persons are called field-independent)
The factors of field dependence and field
in-dependence represent a dimension along
which one’s perceptions may be placed
con-cerning dependence on (or independence
from) cues in the environment (called the
field) In the first and simplest test (called the
rod and frame test or RFT) used to study this
dimension, a participant has to align a
stimu-lus (such as a rod) so that it is “truly” vertical
when a second stimulus (such as a frame
around the rod) is varied with respect to the
true vertical Persons who can set the rod
rela-tively accurately - independently of the
orien-tation of the frame - are called
field-independent because they rely on bodily
sen-sation cues rather than on visual cues in the
field The more the tilt in the field controls the
person’s setting of the rod, the more
field-dependent the individual Another test of the
field independent-dependent dimension is the
embedded-figures test [described by the
Ger-man Gestalt psychologist Kurt Gottschaldt
(1902-1991) in 1926] in which the participant
attempts to locate simple geometric shapes
that are hidden in more complex diagrams/
drawings; field-independent persons perform
better on this test than do field-dependent
per-sons Later, Witkin and others conducted more
elaborate studies using chairs and entire rooms
that could be tilted (in the tilting-room test or
body-adjustment test) The study of the trait
field dependence began in the area of
percep-tion, but the large individual differences that
were found in tests such as RFT,
embedded-figures, and the tilting-room encouraged
re-search in other areas such as personality,
emo-tions, cognitive style, neuropsychological
processes, development, and
psychopathol-ogy Witkin argued that individuals move, in
general, from field-dependence toward field-
independence as they mature However, those
who become most field-independent are those
individuals who are raised in ways that foster
personal autonomy and a secure sense of self
Witkin’s research led to a variety of studies including dreaming, cultural differences in socialization, intellectual processes, interper-sonal relations (e.g., between teachers and students, therapists and patients/clients, and parents and children), brain laterality, and chromosomal aberrations See also BERKE-LEY’S THEORY OF VISUAL SPACE PER-CEPTION; COGNITIVE STYLE MODELS; GESTALT THEORY/LAWS; LATERALITY THEORIES; PERCEPTION (II COMPARA-TIVE APPRAISAL), THEORIES OF; PER-SONALITY, THEORIES OF; SELF-CONCEPT THEORY
REFERENCES
Mach, E (1886/1959) The analysis of
sensa-tions and the relation of the physical
to the psychical New York: Dover Mach, E (1902) The analysis of experience
Jena, East Germany: Fisher
Witkin, H A (1950) Individual differences in
ease of perception of embedded
fig-ures Journal of Personality, 19,
1-15
Witkin, H A., & Goodenough, D (1977)
Field dependence and interpersonal
behavior Psychological Bulletin,
84, 661-689
Witkin, H A., & Goodenough, D (1981)
Cognitive styles: Essence and gins - Field dependence and filed independence New York: Interna-
ori-tional Universities Press
WIT, THEORIES OF See HUMOR,
THE-ORIES OF
WOLPE’S THEORY/TECHNIQUE OF RECIPROCAL INHIBITION The South
African-born American psychiatrist Joseph Wolpe (1915-1997) conducted experimental studies early in his career on the production and cure of neuroses in animals which demon-strated that the neuroses could be produced in learning and, also, could be reversible by learning Later, based on such research, Wolpe derived psychotherapeutic techniques for
treating neuroses in humans Wolpe’s theory and technique constituted one of the many varieties of behavior modification (or behav- ior therapy, which is a procedure of direct
intervention to alter a person’s behaviors to
Trang 21situations that are deemed - by oneself or by
others - to be worthy of change; cf., Ahsen,
1989) Wolpe’s approach, called reciprocal
inhibition, is a form of behavior therapy that
is based on the neurological concept of
recip-rocal innervation, that is, the inhibition of the
action of one neural pathway by the activity of
another (cf., staircase phenomenon or
warm-up effect - refers to a graduated sequence of
increasingly stronger muscle contractions that
occur when a corresponding sequence of
iden-tical stimuli is applied to a rested muscle; cf.,
Bowditch’s law) As a general theory of
be-havior modification, Wolpe’s reciprocal
inhi-bition refers to the inhiinhi-bition of one response
(e.g., yelling) by the occurrence of another
mutually incompatible response (e.g., talking
softly) The specific method used in
recipro-cal inhibition is recipro-called desensitization or
sys-tematic desensitization [cf., progressive
re-laxation - a form of psychotherapy used for
treating anxiety disorders whereby skeletal
muscles throughout the body are first tensed
and then relaxed deeply; it was first described
in 1929 by the American physician Edmund
Jacobson (1888-1983) and is used, often, as an
adjunct to systematic desensitization] In a
clinical context, especially in the treatment of
phobias (“irrational fears”), the procedure of
systematic desensitization is designed to
pro-duce a decrease in anxiety (i.e., “de-sensitize”)
toward some feared situation of object (e.g.,
snakes) This is accomplished by exposing the
client to a series of approximations to the
anxiety-producing stimulus under relaxed
conditions until, eventually, the anxiety
reac-tion becomes extinguished The procedure of
systematic desensitization has come under
heavy criticism from psychoanalytically
ori-ented therapists and theorists over the issue of
the symptom substitution hypothesis (i.e., the
idea that if only the surface or superficial
be-havioral manifestations of a neurosis are
treat-ed in psychotherapy, the presumtreat-ed unresolvtreat-ed
underlying conflict will “erupt” elsewhere,
and new symptoms will emerge) The notion
of symptom substitution derives from the
as-sumption (not accepted by all psychologists)
that psychological disturbances are analogous
to medical disturbances (as in the medical/
disease model of illness) in that they can be
treated only by removal of the root cause of
the disorder (cf., resolution law - attempts to
find a partial explanation of behavioral fication whereby the changing of one physio-logical state into another one becomes easier and quicker after it has taken place a number
modi-of times; and stages modi-of change theory –
sug-gests the following steps be used to gain the self-control required to change an undesirable behavior: pre-contemplation of the advantages and consequences of the change, contempla-tion of benefits, preparation and action, and maintenance of the change) Wolpe indicates that variables such as food, expression of ag-gression, and sexual feeling might work, also,
to reciprocally inhibit avoidance behavior or anxiety feelings Wolpe’s work on the direct
re-education of sexual behavior foreshadowed
W Masters and V Johnson’s widely cized sexual-response studies, and his empha-sis on expression of feeling anticipated the
publi-procedure of assertiveness training See also
ALL-OR-NONE LAW/PRINCIPLE; VIOR THERAPY/COGNITIVE THERAPY, THEORIES OF; BOWDITCH’S LAW; IM-AGERY/MENTAL IMAGERY, THEORIES
BEHA-OF
REFERENCES
Jacobson, E (1929) Progressive relaxation
Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Wolpe, J (1952) Experimental neurosis as
learned behavior British Journal of Psychology, 43, 243-268
Wolpe, J (1954) Reciprocal inhibition as the
main basis of psychotherapeutic
ef-fects Archives of Neurological chiatry, 72, 205-226
Psy-Wolpe, J (1958) Psychotherapy by
recipro-cal inhibition Stanford, CA:
Stan-ford University Press
Masters, W., & Johnson, V (1966) Human
sexual response Boston: Little,
Brown
Ahsen, A (1989) Scientific misconduct in
behaviorist circles Journal of tal Imagery, 13, 1-20
Men-WORD-LENGTH EFFECT See
FORGET-TING/MEMORY, THEORIES OF
WORD-SUPERIORITY EFFECT See
TOP-DOWN PROCESSING/THEORIES
Trang 22WORK ADJUSTMENT, THEORY OF
See WORK/CAREER/OCCUPATION,
THE-ORIES OF
WORK/CAREER/OCCUPATION,
THE-ORIES OF.The psychological study of work,
career, and occupational factors ranges from
theories of decision-making in career
devel-opment to
ergonomic/ergopsychometry/anth-ropometry, human engineering/human factors,
work fatigue/efficiency, applications research,
and work motivation theories Theories of
career development fall into one of several
classes: trait-oriented, systems-oriented,
per-sonality-oriented, or developmental Although
no single approach seems to dominate the
field, each has its own particular utility for
career/work/occupation counselors Once a
person makes a career decision, potential
problems exist in terms of worker
productiv-ity, adjustment to the stress/strain of the
workplace, and level of job satisfaction
Theo-ries in vocational psychology may be divided
into four main categories: matching
ap-proaches (involves theories and methods
based on studies in the area of differential
psychology and on situational theories);
phe-nomenological approaches (involves
self-concept theory and congruence theory; cf.,
consistency theory of work behavior - holds
that work behavior is based on two allied
premises: a balance concept and a self-image
standard; the theory predicts that workers will
engage in satisfying behaviors that maximize
their sense of cognitive balance and will be
motivated to perform in a way that is
consis-tent with their self-image); developmental
approaches (includes role theory and life-stage
theory), and decision-making approaches
Theories of work/job efficiency attempt to
account for effective work performance and
how stress, strain, boredom, fatigue, and other
negative consequences of work affect one’s
health and well-being The theories of work
motivation may be grouped into two broad
areas: universalistic theories - posit
wide-spread applicability to the work environment,
and contingency theories - focus on individual
differences that influence motivation levels
Among the universalistic theories are A
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory -
pro-poses that human behavior is a result of
at-tempts to satisfy currently unsatisfied needs where the needs are arranged in a hierarchical order such that the satisfaction of a prior level
of need leads to a need for satisfaction at a
succeeding level [cf., existence, relatedness, and growth theory, or ERG theory, is a varia- tion of Mas-low’s hierarchy of needs theory as
applied to occupational/industrial settings,
where need categories include existence needs
(relative to the person’s physical needs such as
food, clothing, and shelter), relatedness needs
(relating to interpersonal relations with others,
both on and off the job), and growth needs]; F Herzberg’s two-factor theory - asserts that job
satisfaction and dissatisfaction are caused by different work-related factors such as achievement, recognition, advancement,
growth, and responsibility as satisfiers, and
lack of company policy, administration, nical support/ supervision, salary, job security,
tech-fringe benefits, and status as dissatisfiers; and
D McClelland’s achievement motivation ory - focuses on the needs of power, affilia-
the-tion, and achievement as prominent
work-related factors Among the contingency ries are B F Skinner’s stimulus-response and operant conditioning theory - argues that hu- man behavior is not motivated by needs within
theo-an individual but by the external environment
and the rewards and punishments that it
pro-vides; J S Adams’ equity theory - assumes
that persons are motivated by a desire to be treated equitably on their jobs; and V H
Vroom’s force model in occupational choice and expectancy theory (also called valence- expectancy theory and valence- instrumentality-expectancy theory) - asserts
that a person’s motivation to perform is a function of both perceived desirability and attainability of outcomes, and suggests the behavior is affected by degree of cer-tainty/uncertainty that some outcome will follow the behavior, and how much that out-
come is valued by the worker (cf., tality theory - a cognitive approach to work
instrumen-motivation that states that a person’s attitude about an event/work depends on the percep-tion of the event’s/work’s function as an in-strument in obtaining the desirable, or unde-
sirable, consequences; and role-expectations hypothesis - posits that confirmation of em-
ployees’ prior expectations about the nature of
Trang 23their jobs results in lower job turn-over and
higher degrees of organizational commitment
and job satisfaction) Closely related to work
motivation is the issue of occupational
ad-justment, which is also a major source of
per-sonal identity and role definition One
well-formulated theory of work adjustment (cf.,
Lofquist & Dawis, 1969) maintains that
occu-pational environments provide different
pat-terns of reinforcement that interact with a
person’s needs and abilities, and where
har-mony between an individual and the work
environment results in satisfaction and, as a
consequence, greater level of work stability
(cf., job-characteristics model - holds that
particular needs of employees, such as
auton-omy, feedback, identity, significance, and task
variety, influence job adjustment, satisfaction,
and other employee outcomes; range-of-affect
hypothesis - in the prediction of job
satisfac-tion, this conjecture attempts to explain how
the discrepancies between what one already
has, and what one wants, determine the
poten-tial range of satisfaction yielded by a given
job aspect/facet; and vitamin model of
em-ployee satisfaction - states that different
as-pects of work, much like taking daily dosages
of vitamins, need to be present, at least
mini-mally, in order to produce a satisfied
em-ployee) The theories of motivation and
ad-justment have practical implications for
work-related activities in organizations and
contrib-ute to the maximization of job satisfaction and
worker morale See also BALANCE,
PRIN-CIPLES/THEORY OF;
DECISION-MAK-ING THEORIES; DEVELOPMENTAL
THE-ORY; LEADERSHIP, THEORIES OF;
MAS-LOW’S THEORY OF PERSONALITY;
MO-TIVATION, THEORIES OF;
ORGANIZA-TIONAL/INDUSTRIAL/SYSTEMS THEO-
RY; PERSONALITY THEORIES;
ROLE-THEORY OF PERSONALITY;
SELF-CON-CEPT THEORY; SITUATIONAL THEORY
OF LEADERSHIP
REFERENCES
Taylor, F (1903) Shop management New
York: Harper
Gilbreth, F (1911) Motion study, a method
for increasing efficiency New York:
Van Nostrand
Maslow, A (1943) A theory of human
moti-vation Psychological Review, 50,
370-396
McClelland, D., Atkinson, J., Clark, R., &
Lowell, E (1953) The achievement motive New York: A-C-C
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B
(1959) The motivation to work
New York: Wiley
Adams, J S (1963) Toward an understanding
of inequity Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436 Vroom, V H (1964) Work and motivation
New York: Wiley
Osipow, S (1968/1983) Theories of career
development Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall
Lofquist, L., & Dawis, R (1969) Adjustment
to work New York: A-C-C
Skinner, B F (1971) Beyond freedom and
dignity New York: Bantam Books
Super, D (1994) Career development In R J
Corsini (Ed.), Encyclopedia of chology New York: Wiley
psy-Latham, G P., & Pinder, C C (2005) Work
motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century
Annual Review of Psychology, 56,
485-516
WORKING MEMORY, THEORY OF In
memory/learning psychology, as advanced by the English psychologists Alan D Baddeley (1934- ) and Graham J Hitch (1946- ), the
theory of working memory refers to the
tempo-rary storage system that retains received information items while an interpre-tation process is activated to sort out this in-
currently-put This working memory system allows for
manipulation of the information and its
pas-sage in, and out of, short-term memory
Theo-retically, regarding verbal materials, such as sentences, the words in a sentence are held in their literal and original form or state while a more abstract process works to shape and determine the meaning of the sentence More-over, the storage system is thought to involve
a “central executive” component (language comprehension processor) and two “buffer” components (temporary memory storage also known as “blackboard memory” components)
Trang 24called the phonological loop model (an
inner-speech, verbal, or mental rehearsal
tactic-device, lasting up to two seconds) and the
visuospatial sketchpad/scratch-pad model (a
visual-coding mechanism, assumed to be
re-sponsible for establishing and manipulating
visuo-spatial images) Concerning its location,
it is speculated that the associative processes
of working memory are carried out mostly in
the brain’s prefrontal cortex Working memory
has been studied by psychologists in diverse
human and non-human organisms via
tech-niques such as “object permanence” and
“de-layed-reaction” tests See also CHOMSKY’S
PSYCHOLINGUISTIC THEORY;
DE-LAYED-REACTION PARADIGM; OBJECT
PERMANENCE PARADIGM;
SHORT-TERM AND LONG-SHORT-TERM MEMORY,
THEORIES OF
REFERENCE
Baddeley, A D., & Hitch, G J (1974)
Work-ing memory In G Bower (Ed.),
Re-cent advances in learning and
moti-vation Vol 8 New York:
Aca-demic Press
WUNDT ILLUSION See APPENDIX A
WUNDT’S THEORIES/DOCTRINES/
PRINCIPLES The German physiologist,
psychologist, philosopher, and founder of
experimental psychology Wilhelm Max
Wundt (1832-1920) created and developed the
first school of psychological thought, called
structuralism/structuralist school, whose basic
ten-et was that sensations are the proper
sub-ject matter of psychology (the historical
psy-chological school/theory of functionalism
emphasized the activity/adaptive dimension of
psychological events, whereas Wundt’s
the-ory/ school of structuralism emphasized the
contents of psychological events) Using the
method of introspection (i.e., looking within
one’s own experience and reporting on it),
Wundt and his students investigated
partici-pants’ immediate experience through exacting
attention to sensations and feelings The goals
of structuralism were to analyze conscious
processes into basic elements, to determine
how these elements are connected, and to
establish the laws of these connections (cf.,
Ahsen, 1986) Wundt proposed a
tridimen-sional theory of feeling in which an
equilib-rium between pleasure-displeasure, relaxation, and excitement-calm/depression occupy three independent and distinct dimen-sions of feeling Wundt held that emotions are complex compounds of the elementary feel-ings and that each of the feelings may effec-tively be described by defining its position on each of the three dimensions (cf., Wundt’s
tension-formulation of three principles of emotional expression as a reformulation of Darwin’s principles: the principles of innervation, asso- ciation of analogous sensations, and relation
of movements to images) Wundt’s theory of feeling stimulated a great deal of research in
his own, and rival, laboratories but it has not withstood the test of time Wundt postulated
his doctrine of apperception to explain how
the various elements of conscious experience are combined to form unified conscious ex-
periences He used the term apperception in a
fashion similar to that of the German pher/psychologist Johann Herbart (1776-1841)
philoso-to refer philoso-to the active mental process of ing and structuring internal experience The
select-term apperception is rarely used today in
ex-perimental psychology, but the concepts derlying it are important, especially to many cognitively oriented psychologists Wundt designated the active process of combining the
un-various elements into a unity as his law of psychic resultants (also called the principle of creative synthesis/resultants), which states
that the combination of elements creates new properties where every psychic compound has characteristics that are more than the sum of the characteristics of the elements when taken singly (cf., Mill, 1874) In a sense, Wundt’s
principle of creative synthesis (via J S Mill) and his law of psychic resultants anticipated
the Gestalt theorists’ viewpoint that in tion the “whole is more than the sum of its parts,” where something new is created out of the synthesis of the elemental parts of experi-
percep-ence [cf., synergy theory - developed by the
American functionalist/dynamic psychologist Robert Sessions Woodworth (1869-1962), and emphasizes the idea that mental synthesis is a unitary perceptual or motor response that is generated by the aggregate of sensory ele-ments, and is viewed as stimuli converging on
a single response mechanism; and dynamic
Trang 25theory - a general approach employed by both
Sigmund Freud and Wilhelm Wundt that is
concerned with motivational processes and the
unconscious; the term dynamism is used to
refer to a stable manner of behaving, the
pur-pose of which is to fulfill motives and drives
and to protect the individual from debilitating
stress] At the turn of the 20th century, Wundt
was involved in an academic controversy
call-ed the imageless thought debate The
contro-versy about the nature of thinking was
be-tween the structuralist school of Wundt and E
B Titchener on the one hand, and the
mem-bers of the Wurzburg school in Germany on
the other hand Wundt postulated that
con-sciousness is made up of only three elements:
sensations, images, and feelings; Titchener
placed major emphasis on images as the
vehi-cles of thought The Wurzburg psychologists
hypothesized that participants’ responses are
due to determining tendencies or sets without
the use of imagery (i.e., they argued in favor
of “imageless thought”) The topic of images/
imagery waned with the advent of
behavior-ism in the early 1900s, but then in the 1960s
and 1970s, it was revived with the
develop-ment of the cognitive approach in psychology,
and imagery began to play a significant
theo-retical role in the areas of learning, perception,
thinking, and meaning Wundt’s wide-ranging
laboratory investigations of psychological
phenomena included the psychology and
physiology of seeing, hearing, the “lower”
senses, optics, reaction-time experiments,
word associations, folk psychology, and
psy-chophysics Wundt adopted a purely
psycho-logical interpretation of Weber’s law, which
he considered to be an example of the
psycho-logical law of relativity (cf., Muller, 1878)
Although there were signs reflecting the
theo-retical narrowness of Wundt’s new
experi-mental psychology, it was through Wundt’s
vision, largely, that the conception of an
inde-pendent and inductive psychology became a
reality See also ACH’S
LAWS/PRINCIPLES/THEORY;
BEHAV-IORIST THEORY; DARWIN’S
EV-OLUTION THEORY; DARWIN’S THEORY
OF EMOTIONS; DETERMINING
TEN-DENCY; DONDERS’ LAW; DYNAMIC
THEORY; FUNCTIONALISM THEORY;
GESTALT THEORY/LAWS; HERBART’S
DOCTRINE OF APPERCEPTION; AGERY/MENTAL IMAGERY, THEORIES OF; MILL’S CANONS; MOTIVATION, THEORIES OF; SET, LAW OF; WEBER’S LAW
IM-REFERENCES
Wundt, W M (1862) Beitrage zur theorie
der sinneswahrnehmung Leipzig:
Engelmann
Wundt, W M (1873) Grundzuege der
physi-ologischen psychologie Leipzig:
Engelmann
Mill, J S (1874) A system of logic New
York: Harper
Muller, G (1878) Zur grundlegung der
psy-chophysik Berlin: Gruben
Wundt, W M (1896) Grundriss der
psycho-logie Leipzig: Engelmann
Wundt, W M (1897) Principles of
psycholo-gy Leipzig: Engelmann
Ahsen, A (1986) The New Structuralism:
Images in dramatic interlock nal of Mental Imagery, 10, 1-92
Jour-WYER AND COLLINS’ THEORY OF HUMOR ELICITATION This theory of
humor (that borrows heavily from several
aspects of M J Apter’s reversal theory)
specifies the conditions in which humor is experienced both in social and non-social
situations The theory of humor elicitation
(Wyer & Collins, 1992) emphasizes the lowing aspects: the interpretation of a stimu-lus-event that is necessary to evoke humor; the problems of identifying the humor-eliciting characteristics of the stimulus-event interpre-tation; and the cognitive elaboration of the various implications of the stimulus-event
fol-Moreover, the theory of humor elicitation
assesses the persons’ information-processing objectives at the time a stimulus-event occurs; and, in particular, the theory has been used to conceptualize the humor evoked by witti-cisms, jokes, and social events that are neither intended nor expected to be humorous In their
comprehension-elaboration theory of humor,
Wyer and Collins propose a series of eight postulates (memory, encoding, prior and later stimulus-events, incongruity resolution, prag-matic meaning, humor elicitation, comprehen-sion difficulty, cognitive elaboration) concern-ing the comprehension of semantic and epi-
Trang 26sodic information, the conditions of humor elicitation, and the elaboration of stimulus-
events Thus, this theory of humor elicitation
is based on the assumption that situational and individual-differences variables that affect the perception of humor may be viewed in terms
of their mediating influence on certain information processes involving previously acquired concepts and general knowledge Overall, the theory focuses on the cognitive foundations of one’s responses to ethnic hu-mor and to humor that is directed toward one-self See also APTER’S REVERSAL THE-ORY OF HUMOR; HUMOR, THEORIES OF; MOTIVATIONAL THEORIES OF HU-MOR
social-REFERENCES
Apter, M J (1982) The experience of
motiva-tion: The theory of psychological reversals London: Academic Press
Wyer, R S., & Collins, J E (1992) A theory
of humor elicitation Psychological Review, 99, 663-688
Trang 27X
X, THEORY See LEADERSHIP,
THEO-RIES OF;
ORGANIZATIONAL/INDUSTRI-AL/SYSTEMS THEORY
Trang 28Y
YAVIS-HOUND PHENOMENA/
SYN-DROMES The American psychotherapist
William Schofield (1921- ) suggests that the
acronym YAVIS embodies the personal
quali-ties that therapists, counselors, and the
Ameri-can general public find most appealing in
pa-tients, clients, associates, and other
individu-als YAVIS refers to the attributes of young,
attractive, verbal, intelligent, and successful
On the other hand, the acronym HOUND
embodies personality characteristics that
therapists, counselors, and the American
gen-eral public find least appealing in patients,
clients, associates, and other individuals
HOUND refers to the qualities of humble, old,
unattractive, nonverbal, and dumb See also
PERSONALITY THEORIES
REFERENCE
Schofield, W (1964/1986) Psychotherapy:
The purchase of friendship
En-glewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall/
New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction
YERKES-DODSON LAW This principle is
a statement of the relationship between
arousal level and quality of performance
for-mulated in 1908 by the American comparative
psychologists Robert Means Yerkes
(1876-1956) and John Dillingham Dodson (dates
unknown) The Yerkes-Dodson law, also
call-ed the invertcall-ed-U hypothesis, indicates that
there is an optimal level of arousal (e.g.,
moti-vation, anxiety) for tasks where moderate
levels of arousal facilitate problem solving,
but if stress or anxiety is too high (or too low),
the person does not process the important and
relevant cues (or ignores them), and optimal
learning and performance fail to occur Thus,
the Yerkes-Dodson law states that increased
drive will improve performance up to a point,
beyond which there is deterioration of
per-formance However, the law may need to be
qualified by various factors, one of which is
task “complexity.” That is, the complexity of
the task to be performed may need to be
ex-amined and controlled wherein the optimal level of motivation should be higher for a simple task than it is for a complex task For example, solving difficult mathematical prob-lems within a time limit (a complex task) may
be best accomplished by only a slight level of arousal instead of being highly aroused or excited On the other hand, sorting and re-shelving library books all day (a simple task) may best be done by creating a high level of motivation in the person On the whole, the
Yerkes-Dodson law seems reasonable and
useful, but it has received only mixed support from psychologists See also ACTIVATION/ AROUSAL THEORY; INVERTED-U HY-POTHESIS
REFERENCES
Yerkes, R M., & Dodson, J D (1908) The
relation of strength of stimulus to
rapidity of habit formation Journal
of Comparative Neurology and chology, 18, 459-482
Psy-Brown, W P (1965) The Yerkes-Dodson law
repealed Psychological Reports, 67,
663-666
Anderson, K., Revelle, W., & Lynch, M
(1989) Caffeine, impulsivity, and memory scanning: A comparison of two explanations for the Yerkes-
Dodson effect Motivation and tion, 13, 1-20
Emo-Anderson, K (1994) Impulsivity, caffeine,
and task difficulty: A
within-sub-jects test of the Yerkes-Dodson law Personality and Individual Differ- ences, 16, 813-819
Teigen, K (1994) Yerkes-Dodson: A law for
all seasons Theory & Psychology,
4, 525-547
YO-HE-HO THEORY See LANGUAGE
ORIGINS, THEORIES OF
YO-YO EFFECT See HUNGER,
Trang 29three-ele-proposed that color vision is due to three
dif-ferent kinds of visual fibers Young’s original
theory was based on Sir Isaac Newton’s
(1642-1727) earlier demonstration in physics
of the existence of three primary colors (red,
green, and blue) Because Young found it
difficult to conceive of each sensitive point in
the retina as containing an infinite number of
particles to be capable of vibrating in perfect
unison with every possible undulation of light
energy, he suggested that there are only three
kinds of fibers corresponding to three primary
colors (red, green, and blue) Young expanded
his theory somewhat in 1807, but it remained
unrecognized, essentially, as it sat in the
Phi-losophical Transactions of the Royal Society
of London until 1852 when the German
physiologist/psychologist Hermann von
Helmholtz (1821-1894) rediscovered and
popularized it [the Scottish physicist James
Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) is reputed, also,
to have “rediscovered” Young’s early work at
about the same time as did Helmholtz]
Helm-holtz wrote his quantitative line-element
treatment of color vision and color
discrimina-tion short-ly before his death [cf., Helmholtz’s
theory of accommodation - states that the
shape of the lens of the eye becomes convex
as the ciliary muscle relaxes, and flattens as
the ciliary muscle contracts; even though the
concept of the lens changing shape originated
with the French philosopher Rene Descartes
(1596-1650), it was Helmholtz who elaborated
the physiological mechanism involved in the
pro-cess] As he developed his quantitative
theory, Helmholtz studied whether or not hue
could be discriminated on the basis of
grada-tions in the intensity of three fundamental
processes (red, green, blue) that are evoked
whenever the retinal cones are stimulated by
light energy Today, this theory is known as
the Young-Helmholtz theory, and it postulates
three types of cones (red, green, blue), each
containing a different chemical substance
where each is sensitive maximally to a
differ-ent region of the electromagnetic spectrum
Consistent with the law of specific nerve
en-ergies, the red cones (if stimulated in
isola-tion) would give a “red” sensation, green
cones would give a “green” sensation, and
blue cones would give a “blue” sensation
Also, according to the theory, the rate of firing
(“excitability”) of each cone type depends on the wavelength of the stimulating light Thus, the phenomenal or subjective experience of
hue (i.e., “color”) depends on the relative
frequencies of impulses set up in the three
types of fibers, brightness (i.e., “intensity”)
depends on the total frequency of impulses in
all three fibers, and saturation (i.e., “purity”)
depends on the amount of white produced in any quantifiable fusion of the fibers All the other hues (including yellow, purple, and white or gray) are due to various combinations
of the three component activities The Helmholtz color vision theory contains widely
Young-accepted ideas by psychologists today and has
the advantages of accounting for the laws of color mixing and of parsimony over other
theories that advance the involvement of more than three receptor processes in the visual
experience However, the Young-Helmholtz theory does have a number of difficulties as-
sociated with it: accounting fully for the
ex-periences of color-blind individuals [cf., tonism, which is red-green color blindness,
Dal-and is named after the English chemist John Dalton (1766-1844) who had it and first de-
scribed it]; accounting for the brightness
func-tions of both normal and color-blind persons; and accounting for contrary evidence that
shows that the blue component in color vision
has different properties than either the red or green components See also ACCOMMODA-TION, LAW/PRINCIPLE OF; COLOR MIXTURE, LAWS/THEORY OF; COLOR VISION, THEORIES/LAWS OF; SPECIFIC NERVE ENERGIES, LAW OF
REFERENCES
Young, T (1801) On the mechanism of the
eye Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 91, 23-
88
Young, T (1807) On the theory of light and
colours In W Savage (Ed.), tures in natural philosophy Vol 2
Lec-London: Joseph Johnson, St Paul’s Church Yard
Helmholtz, H von (1852) On the theory of
compound colours Philosophy gazine, 4, 519-534
Ma-Helmholtz, H von (1892) Versuch das
psy-chophysische gesetz auf die farben unterschiede trichromatischer augen
Trang 30anzuwenden Zeitschrift fur chologie und Physiologie Sinnesor- gange, 3, 1-20
Psy-YOUNG’S COLOR VISION THEORY
See YOUNG-HELMHOLTZ COLOR ION THEORY
VIS-Y, THEORY See LEADERSHIP,
THEO-RIES OF
Trang 31Z
ZAJONC’S AROUSAL AND
CONFLU-ENCE THEORIES The Polish-born social
psychologist Robert B Zajonc (1923- )
pro-posed the following generalization concerning
social facilitation (i.e., the tendency to
per-form a task better in the presence of others
than when alone) and social interference (i.e.,
a decline in performance when observers are
present): the presence of others facilitates
performance of dominant (i.e., simple,
habit-ual, or instinctive) responses and interferes
with performance of nondominant (i.e.,
com-plex, nonhabitual, or unnatural) responses (cf.,
audience effect or spectator effect - the
influ-ence of passive onlookers/spectators on a
person’s task performance; next-in-line effect -
refers to a decrement in recall for an event
immediately preceding an anticipated public
performance; and coaction effect - is the
influ-ence on a person’s task performance of the
presence of other people engaging in the same
activity) In the drive theory of social
facilita-tion, Zajonc explains both facilitation and
interference effects by linking them to the
more general phenomenon of the effect of
high arousal (drive) on performance That is,
high arousal typically improves performance
of simple or well-learned tasks and worsens
performance of complex or poorly-learned
tasks (cf., Yerkes & Dodson, 1908)
Accord-ing to Zajonc’s theory, the main effect of the
presence of others is to increase arousal after
which easy responses are easier, and difficult
responses become more difficult (cf.,
com-presence effect - is an arousal effect generated
by other people being present where,
depend-ing on conditions, performance is influenced
either positively or negatively) Studies of the
influence of others’ presence and the effects
of being observed on one’s performance go
back to the late 1800s (cf., Triplett, 1898) and
the early 1900s (cf., Allport, 1920), and report
social facilitation in some experiments but
social interference in other studies Zajonc’s
theory is able to explain both types of
out-come, suggesting that the mere presence of
others who are members of one’s own species
may enhance arousal innately Social tion has been observed in athletes, children,
facilita-chickens, and even cockroaches (that learn a maze faster if watched by other roaches)
Other theorists, however, explain such arousal
in somewhat different terms; for instance, in
terms such as evaluation anxiety (cf., Geen, 1991), self-perception of one’s skill at the task (cf., Sanna, 1992), and self-consciousness (cf.,
Baumeister & Showers, 1986) Zajonc’s
ex-planation for social facilitation is based in the context of a broader theory of emotion, in
which a person may have an emotional tion to a stimulus without any corresponding cognitive reaction; this theoretical approach
reac-differs from the two-factor theory of emotion
that posits a two-step self-perception process where one first experiences physiological arousal and seeks an explanation for it, and then it is the labeling of the arousal that is experienced as the emotion Zajonc has theo-rized, also concerning the influence of envi-ronmental factors on human intelligence, in particular the relationship between birth order
and intelligence (cf., birth order effect –
con-jecture that first-born children, and children, tend to be high achievers; also, the larger the family size, the lower the average
only-IQ of the children) In attempting to answer the finding of several studies that first-borns tend to have higher IQs than second-borns, who tend to have higher IQs than third-borns,
and so on, Zajonc’s confluence theory
sug-gests that each individual’s intellectual growth depends to an important degree on the intel-lectual environment in which the child devel-
ops Zajonc’s confluence theory and his
inter-pretation of the correlation between birth der and intelligence, however, are not univer-sally accepted, and have been the source of heated debate See also ACTIVATION/ AROUSAL THEORY; COGNITIVE THEO-RIES OF EMOTIONS; MERE EXPOSURE EFFECT; SCHACHTER-SINGER’S THE-ORY OF EMOTIONS; YERKES-DODSON LAW
or-REFERENCES
Triplett, N (1898) The dynamogenic factors
in peacemaking and competition
American Journal of Psychology, 9,
507-533
Trang 32Yerkes, R M., & Dodson, J D (1908) The
relation of strength of stimulus to
rapidity of habit formation Journal
of Comparative Neurology and
Psy-chology, 18, 459-482
Allport, F (1920) The influence of group
upon association and thought
Jour-nal of Experimental Psychology, 3,
Quarter, J., & Marcus, A (1971) Drive level
and the audience effect: A test of
Zajonc’s theory Journal of Social
Psychology, 83, 99-105
Zajonc, R B., & Markus, G (1975) Birth
order and intellectual development
Psychological Review, 82, 74-88
Zajonc, R B (1976) Family configuration
and intelligence: Variations in
scho-lastic aptitude scores parallel trends
in family size and the spacing of
children Science, 192, 226-236
Zajonc, R B (1983) Validating the
conflu-ence model Psychological
Bull-etin, 93, 457-480
Zajonc, R B (1985) Emotion and facial
ef-ference: A theory reclaimed
Sci-ence, 228, 15-21
Baumeister, R., & Showers, C (1986) A
re-view of paradoxical performance
ef-fects: Choking under pressure in
sports and mental tests European
Journal of Social Psychology, 16,
361-383
Geen, R (1991) Social motivation Annual
Review of Psychology, 42, 377-399
Sanna, L (1992) Self-efficacy theory:
Impli-cations for social facilitation and
so-cial loafing Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 62, 774-786
ZANFORLIN ILLUSION See APPENDIX
A
ZEIGARNIK EFFECT/PHENOMENON
= unaccomplished action effect = resumption
of interrupted action effect This phenomenon
is the seemingly paradoxical assertion by the
Russian female psychologist Blyuma V
Zei-garnik (1900-1988) that the recall of ed/unfinished tasks is superior to the recall of completed tasks Zeigarnik is noted for her doctoral dissertation that was the first formal
interrupt-test of Kurt Lewin’s Gestalt theory concerning
the idea that attainment of a goal relieves sion In a typical experimental procedure for
ten-the Zeigarnik effect, participants are asked to
perform 15-22 different tasks; some tasks are manual (e.g., stringing beads), and some are mental (e.g., solving puzzles) On half of the activities, participants are allowed to continue until completion, but on the other half of the tasks they are asked to stop and move on to a new activity Following this phase, the task materials are removed, and the participants are asked to recall some of the activities that they had just experienced Results of this simple procedure typically show that the number of incompleted or unfinished tasks (called “I”) that are recalled is higher than the number of completed tasks (called “C”) A calculated ratio, using “I/C,” was always greater than 1.0
in Zeigarnik’s experiments In some cases, the I/C ratio was related, subsequently, to a per-son’s “ambition” level Among the possible alternative explanations that may account for
the Zeigarnik effect are that participants may
implicitly assume that the interrupted tasks will be completed at a later time; task inter-ruption may set up a new motive involving resentment toward the interrupter, which causes better memory; the interruption of a task emphasizes that task; the participant may attempt to achieve “closure” concerning the incompleted tasks; participants’ personal his-tories in being rewarded for attending to un-solved problems may lead to better memory; and fulfillment and completion may be de-fined differently by different persons in terms
of their own sense of satisfaction Studies
show that the Zeigarnik effect is less likely to
occur if the participant is ego-involved in the task, and is most likely to occur if the individ-ual has a genuine level of aspiration in the interrupted task (i.e., the task is possible of being achieved ultimately) Other studies indi-cate that the differential effect between the I and C tasks seems to be quite temporary (typi-cally being lost over a period of 24 hours), and does not occur with all types of tasks See also
Trang 33GESTALT THEORY/LAWS; LEWIN’S
FIELD THEORY
REFERENCES
Zeigarnik, B (1927) Untersuchungen zur
handlungsund affekpsychologie
Herausgegeben von K Lewin, 3
Das behalten erledigter und
unerele-digter handlung Psychologische
Forschung, 9, 1-85
Freeman, G (1930) Changes in tonus during
completed and interrupted mental
work Journal of General
Psych-ology, 4, 309-333
Pachauri, A (1936) A study of Gestalt
prob-lems in completed and interrupted
tasks British Journal of Psychology,
27, 170-180
Prentice, W (1944) The interruption of tasks
Psychological Review, 51, 329-340
Glixman, A (1949) Recall of completed and
incompleted activities under varying
degrees of stress Journal of
Ex-perimental Psychology, 39,
281-295
Reeve, J., Cole, S., & Olson, B (1986) The
Zeigarnik effect and intrinsic
moti-vation: Are they the same?
Motiva-tion and EmoMotiva-tion, 10, 233-245
ZEILER’S THEORY See SPENCE’S
THE-ORY
ZEISING’S PRINCIPLE This
generaliza-tion refers to a term - golden secgeneraliza-tion - that was
used by the German mathematician Adolph
Zeising (1810-1876), and called attention to
the aesthetic value of the geometric
relation-ships inherent in a rectangle That is, the
golden section is the division of a line or area
into two parts, or the relations of the sides of a
rectangle, in such a manner that the ratio of
the smaller to the larger equals the ratio of the
larger to the whole This principle of
propor-tion was investigated experimentally by the
German physicist/mathematician/philosopher
Gustav Fechner (1801-1887) in the area called
experimental aesthetics Fechner’s seminal
re-search on preferences for shapes gave
experi-mental aesthetics its “reductionistic” quality
(i.e., examining aesthetics from “below” from
a structural point of view) Investigations have
been made by researchers for an aesthetic
formula (cf., Birkhoff, 1933) In one case, the
aesthetic measure (M) of balance or unity (represented by the number 1) is defined as the ratio of order (O) to complexity (C): in the resulting formula, M = O/C, the various com-ponents of an artwork can be physically speci-fied, measured, and evaluated where the closer
it is to 1, the more “harmonious” the object
Zeising’s principle attempts to answer the
per-sistent question in aesthetics concerning the dimensions of preferred shapes such as en-
compassed in the concept of the golden tion See also EYE PLACEMENT PRINCI-
sec-PLE; FECHNER’S LAW; GESTALT ORY/LAWS; WEBER’S LAW
THE-REFERENCES
Zeising, A (1855) Aesthetische forschungen
Frankfort, Germany: Breitkopf & Haertel
Zeising, A (1884) Der goldene schnitt
Leip-zig: Breitkopf & Haertel
Fechner, G (1897) Vorschule der aesthetik
Leipzig: Breitkopf & Haertel Archibald, R C (1920) Notes on the loga-
rithmic spiral, golden section, and the Fibonacci series In J Ham-
bridge (Ed.), Dynamic symmetry
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Birkhoff, G (1933) Aesthetic measure
Cam-bridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Valentine, C (1962) The experimental
psy-chology of beauty London:
Methu-en
Zusne, L (1970) Visual perception of form
New York: Academic Press
Hintz, J M., & Nelson, T M (1976) Golden
section: Reassessment of the
peri-metric hypothesis American nal of Psychology, 83, 126-129
Jour-Child, I (1978) Aesthetic theories In E
Car-terette & M Friedman (Eds.),
Handbook of perception Vol 10
New York: Academic Press
Plug, C (1980) The golden section
hypoth-esis American Journal of ogy, 93, 367-387
Psychol-McWhinnie, H J (1987) A review of
se-lected research on the golden
sec-tion hypothesis Visual Arts search, 13, 73-84
Trang 34Re-Davis, S T., & Jahnke, J C (1991) Unity
and the golden section: Rules for
aesthetic choice? American Journal
of Psychology, 104, 257-277
ZEITGEIST THEORY See
NATURALIS-TIC THEORY OF HISTORY
ZEN BUDDHISM See BUDDHISM/ZEN
BUDDHISM, DOCTRINE OF
ZENO, ACHILLES ARGUMENT OF The
Greek philosopher Zeno of Elea (early 5th
century B.C.) was the author/originator of the
sophism (i.e., a clever and plausible but
falla-cious argument or form of reasoning) called
the Achilles argument to prove, theoretically,
that motion is impossible According to the
argument, Achilles (who was the fastest
pos-sible runner) could never overtake the tortoise
(who was the slowest moving animal) if the
tortoise had ever so short a start The
reason-ing behind the argument is that because the
distance between them consists of an infinite
series of parts, and when Achilles, by
travers-ing one of these parts, comes to where the
tortoise was, the latter will always have gone
further A variation on Zeno’s famous
“Ach-illes-tortoise” philosophical paradox or
sce-nario is the equally-paradoxical or specious
argument that an arrow shot from a bow will
never truly reach its target because,
theoreti-cally, it will always have gone only half the
existing distance to the target at any given
moment See also PROBLEM-SOLVING
AND CREATIVITY STAGE THEORIES
REFERENCE
Baldwin, J M (Ed.) (1901-1905) Dictionary
of philosophy and psychology New
York: Macmillan
ZIPF’S LAW This proposition was
devel-oped by the American philologist George
Kingsley Zipf (1902-1950), and states that an
equilibrium exists between uniformity and
diversity in examining various psychological
phenomena In general, Zipf’s law describes
the relationship between the frequency with
which a certain event occurs (e.g., the
fre-quency of usage of a word in a language) and
the number of events that occur with that
fre-quency In particular, Zipf’s law states that
when examining certain aspects of language,
it is predicted that there are a very large
num-ber of very short words (e.g., “auto”) that
occur with high frequency and progressively
fewer longer words (e.g., “automobile”) that
occur with lower frequency Zipf sized that such uniformities or “tendencies” in language usage are the result of a biological
hypothe-principle of least effort Although this latter
notion has not been validated by other searchers (these uniformities are now known
re-to be merely the necessary result of particular
stochastic processes), Zipf’s linguistic pothesis that frequency of word usage and
hy-word length are inversely related seems to be
a pervasive phenomenon of language usage, especially in the present age of computers and the perceived need for rapid communication See also LEAST EFFORT, PRINCIPLE OF
REFERENCES
Zipf, G K (1935) The psycho-biology of
language Boston: Houghton
Mif-flin
Zipf, G K (1945) The repetition of words,
time-perspective, and semantic
bal-ance Journal of General ogy, 32, 127-148; 33, 251-256
Psychol-ZOLLNER/POGGENDORFF ILLUSION
See APPENDIX A
ZOMBIISM THEORY The phenomenon of
zombiism (i.e., a corpse-like/robot-like human
being believed to belong to the “living dead,” who is buried alive and resurrected by witch-doctors in order to carry out their directives, existing in particular in the voodoo cult of Haiti and various West African religions) has been studied by the Irish-Canadian ethnobi-
ologist E Wade Davis (1953- ) In his biism theory, Davis suggests that in the secret
zom-cult activities the ingestion by the victim of a barely sub-lethal dosage of a poison/magic powder (consisting of such substances as pufferfish and other ingredients containing the neurotoxin tetrodotoxin) results in a deep coma resembling death The witchcraft cere-monies also typically involve a live burial where, along with the poison, extensive neuro-logical damage usually occurs in the victim Later, when the victim is exhumed/revived, he
or she typically has few intact memories or