1. Trang chủ
  2. » Văn bán pháp quy

Gale Encyclopedia Of American Law 3Rd Edition Volume 9 P15 pdf

10 136 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 10
Dung lượng 166,49 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

For example, a professional association of physicians could never acquire exclusive rights to register a service mark under the name“Health Care Services.” Such a mark does little to dis

Trang 1

services provided in the same field Service marks consist of letters, words, symbols, and other devices that help inform consumers about the origin or source of a particular service Roto-Rooter is an example of a service mark used by a familiar plumbing company TRADEMARKS, by contrast, are used to distinguish competing products, not services Whereas trademarks are normally affixed to goods by means of a tag or label, service marks are generally displayed only through advertising and promotion

Service marks are regulated by the law of

UNFAIR COMPETITION At the federal level, service mark INFRINGEMENT is governed by the LANHAM TRADEMARK ACTof 1946 (15 U.S.C.A § 1051 et

seq.) At the state level, service mark infringe-ment is governed by analogous INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY statutes that have been enacted in many jurisdictions In some states, service mark infringement may give rise to aCAUSE OF ACTION

under the COMMON LAW Because service marks are a particular type of trademark, the substan-tive and procedural rules governing both types

of marks are fundamentally the same

The rights to a service mark may be acquired

in two ways First, a business can register the mark with the government Most service marks are eligible for registration with the U.S.PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Several state governments have separate registration requirements Once a service mark has been registered, the law typically affords protection to the first mark filed with the government Second, a business may acquire rights to a service mark through public use

However, a mark must be held out to the public regularly and continuously before it will receive legal protection Sporadic or irregular use of a service mark will not insulate it from infringement

To receive protection, a service mark must also be unique, unusual, or distinctive Com-mon, ordinary, and generic marks rarely qualify for protection For example, a professional association of physicians could never acquire exclusive rights to register a service mark under the name“Health Care Services.” Such a mark does little to distinguish the services provided

by the business and tells consumers nothing about the HEALTH CARE practitioners involved

The law could give full legal protection to these same doctors, however, if they were to apply for a mark under the name “Snap and Jerk Chiropractic Services.”

Once a business has established vested rights

in a service mark, the law forbids other businesses from advertising their services with confusably similar marks Service mark in-fringement occurs when a particular mark is easily mistaken for other marks already estab-lished in the same trade and geographic market Greater latitude is given when businesses that share similar marks are in unrelated fields or offer services in different consumer markets For example, a court would be more inclined to allow two businesses to share the same mark when one business provides pest control services in urban areas, while the other provides film developing services in rural areas

Two remedies are available for service mark infringement: injunctive relief (court orders restraining defendants from infringing on a plaintiff’s service mark) and money damages (compensation for any losses suffered by an injured business) Both remedies are normally available whether a claim for infringement is pursued under state or federal law However, the

LANHAM ACTallows an injured business to recover significantly greater damages for infringement of

a federally registered mark than it could recover under comparable state legislation

Service marks protect the good will and reputation earned by businesses that have invested time, energy, and money in bringing quality services to the public Service marks also encourage competition by requiring businesses

to associate their marks with the quality of services they offer In this way, service marks function as a barometer of quality upon which consumers may rely when making decisions to purchase However, service marks are often infringed, and consumers grow leery when inferior services are passed off as a competitor’s through use of too similar a mark Thus legal protection of service marks can save consumers from making improvident expenditures for services of dubious or unknown origin Since the late 1990s, service marks have been registered in connection with the con-struction of sports stadiums and arenas In

2005 sports stadium and arena construction projects reached a total cost of approximately

$10 billion Apart from their expensive costs, sports facilities are receiving public attention for another reason, specifically the involvement of major corporations with regard to naming rights Generally, the sale of a naming right

Trang 2

grants a private entity the right to license the

sports stadium the entity’s name in exchange

for monetary payments over a certain period of

time The sale of naming rights provides a

major source of funds for expensive

construc-tion such as the Naconstruc-tional Football League (NFL)

stadium in Denver, Invesco Field at Mile High,

which cost about $400 million

Some companies use naming rights not only

to build brand awareness but also to extend

legal protection for their service marks

Gener-ally corporate sponsors register their service in

the international class 041 (“Education and

entertainment”) The registered service marks

of the corporate naming rights sponsors

typically consist of their previously established

service marks plus the term“Field,” “Stadium,”

“Park,” or “Center.” The registrations usually

contain a disclaimer for the affix; for example,

“no claim is made to the exclusive right to use

‘Stadium’ apart from the mark as shown.” The

corporate sponsors have registered different

descriptions of their services, but two general

expressions have been widely used: providing

stadium facilities for sports and entertainment

and providing entertainment in the nature of

sporting events

Examples of service mark registrations

include: BUSCH STADIUM, “Providing a

sporting and entertainment facility for the

enjoyment of others,” owned by

Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated; UNITED CENTER,

“En-tertainment services; namely providing and

leasing stadium facilities for sporting events ,”

owned by United Airlines, Inc.; INVESCO

FIELD AT MILE HIGH,“Providing facilities for

sporting events, namely football games and soccer

Matches ” owned by Amvescap PLC Company

United Kingdom;

Some legal observers have questioned the

validity of these service marks, especially when

they are registered by a company that ordinarily

sells products and not services PepsiCo, for

example, sells beverages and snack products So

what legal purpose is served by allowing the

company to register a service mark for the

naming rights it owns in the Pepsi Center in

Denver, Colorado? The answer is that PepsiCo

negotiated the right to pour its Pepsi products

to customers for all events at the Pepsi Center

plus the first option for in-arena vending rights

and concession trade for PepsiCo’s subsidiary

food product division, which at the time PepsiCo

registered its service mark included Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, and Kentucky Fried Chicken In determining the validity of any service mark, the PTO will consider each case on its own merits The PTO has typically made its determi-nations in conjunction with traditional service businesses such as laundries, insurance compa-nies, telephone compacompa-nies, and railroads It remains to be seen whether the PTO will encounter any thorny legal challenges to this relatively new type of service mark

CROSS REFERENCES Consumer Protection; Trademarks.

SERVICE OF PROCESS Delivery of a writ, summons, or other legal papers

to the person required to respond to them

Process is the general term for the legal document by which a lawsuit is started and the court asserts its jurisdiction over the parties and the controversy In modern U.S law, process is usually a summons A summons is a paper that tells a defendant that he is being sued in a specific court that the plaintiff believes has jurisdiction Served with the summons is a complaint that contains the plaintiff’s allega-tions of wrongdoing by the defendant and the legal remedy sought by the plaintiff The summons also informs the defendant that he has a specified number of days under law to respond to the summons and complaint If the defendant does not respond, the plaintiff may seek a default judgment from the court, granting the plaintiff the legal relief specified

in the complaint

Rules of CIVIL PROCEDURE and CRIMINAL PRO-CEDUREdetermine the proper form of legal pro-cess and how it should be served The rules vary among federal and state courts, but they are meant to give the defendant notice of the proceedings and to command him to either respond to the allegations or to appear at a specified time and answer the claim or criminal charge The concept of notice is critical to the integrity of legal proceedings DUE PROCESS

forbids legal action against a person unless the person has been given notice and an opportu-nity to be heard

Process must be properly served on all parties in an action Anyone who is not served is not bound by the decision in the case A person

SERVICE OF PROCESS 129

Trang 3

who believes that proper service has not taken place may generally challenge the service without actually making a formal appearance

in the case

Whether service was proper is usually deter-mined at a pretrial hearing A defendant must request a special appearance before the court A special appearance is made for the limited purpose of challenging the sufficiency of the service of process or thePERSONAL JURISDICTIONof the court No other issues may be raised with-out the proceeding becoming a general appear-ance The court must then determine whether it has jurisdiction over the defendant

Methods of Service Three basic methods are used for service of process: (1) actual, or personal, service, (2) substituted service, and (3) service by publica-tion Although each method is legally accept-able,PERSONAL SERVICE is preferred because it is the most effective way of providing notice and

it is difficult for the defendant to attack its legality

Personal service means in-hand delivery of the papers to the proper person Traditionally personal service was the only method of service allowed by law because it was best suited to give the defendant notice of the proceedings

Substituted service is any method used instead of personal service Forms of substituted service vary among different jurisdictions, but all are intended to offer a good chance that the defendant actually will find out about the pro-ceedings If a defendant is not at home, many states permit service by leaving the summons and complaint with any person at the defendant’s home who is old enough to understand the responsibility of accepting service Some states permit service by affixing the summons and complaint to the entrance of the defendant’s home or place of business and then mailing a copy of the papers to that individual at his last known address This method is often called

“nail and mail” service A number of states allow service simply by mailing the papers to the defendant’s actual address; registered mail is generally required States also consider service valid if the defendant’s property is attached, or legally seized, within the state and the papers are then mailed to him

Under the laws of some states, substituted service may be used only after diligent efforts to

effect personal service have failed Some forms

of substituted service may have to be tried before others can be used Other states permit substituted service at any time or after a single attempt to find the defendant and serve the papers personally

A third method of service is publication of a notice in a newspaper Publication is also called constructive service because the court construes

it to be effective whether the defendant actually reads the notice or not Generally, service by publication is allowed only by leave of the court, which usually grants permission only when the plaintiff can show that no other method of service can be effected Usually the legal notice must be published in at least one newspaper of general circulation where the defendant is likely

to be found or where the court is located, or in both places Ordinarily the notice must be published on more than one occasion, such as once a week for three weeks

In truth, courts realize that defendants rarely read notices published in newspapers, but the effort must be made when the defendant cannot be found and served in any other way Plaintiffs prefer not to use publication because it

is expensive and a court might later find that the defendant could have been served personally

Where Process May Be Served Legal papers may have to be served within the geographical reach of the jurisdiction, or authority, of the court If the service itself is the basis for the court’s jurisdiction over the defendant, then the service usually must be made within the state For lower-level courts, service may have to be made within the county where the court is located Trial courts of general jurisdiction usually permit service anywhere within the state Service of process for an action in a federal district court may be made anywhere within the state where the court sits or, for some parties, any place in the United States that is not more than one hundred miles from the courthouse

A variety of statutes permit state courts to exercise authority over persons not physically present within the state These are calledLONG

-ARM STATUTES They specify factors, other than the defendant’s physical presence within the state, that provide sufficient justification for the court to exercise jurisdiction over the defen-dant, such as doing business within the state or

Trang 4

having an automobile accident within the state.

When one of these factors exists, the

prospec-tive defendant can be served with legal process

outside the state because the service itself is not

the basis of the court’s jurisdiction

Substituted or constructive methods of

service may be used on a defendant who comes

within the long-arm jurisdiction of the state

For example, many states permit a plaintiff to

serve an out-of-state resident who was involved

in a traffic accident in the state by serving legal

process on the attorney general of the

defen-dant’s state and then sending copies to the

defendant at his residence The statute makes

the attorney general the agent for the service of

process on out-of-state drivers Such a statute is

based on the theory that a nonresident driver

has consented to this method of service by using

the highways and facilities within the state

Who Must Be Served

Service of process is effective only if the right

person is served When the defendant can be

described but not named, service by publication

can be made with a fictional name like Richard

Roe Where the defendant is not a natural person

but a corporation, statutes generally provide for

effective service on a managing agent, a director,

an officer, or anyone designated an agent in the

corporation’s application for a charter or a

license to do business within the state

If the person to be sued is a child or a

person incapable of managing his own legal

affairs, service may be made on a parent,

guardian, or someone else entrusted with the

defendant’s care or affairs The plaintiff may ask

the court to designate a proper person when

there is doubt An estate can be sued by service

of process on an executor or administrator The

plaintiff may ask the court to appoint such a

person if none has yet been named

When more than one person is being sued,

each of them must be served For example, if a

partnership is sued, each partner must be

served

When Papers Can Be Served

The proper time for service of process depends

on the law of the jurisdiction Service must be

made within the time that the STATUTE OF

LIMITATIONS allows for starting that particular

kind of action because it is service that starts

the lawsuit

Many states have long prohibited personal

or substituted service on Sunday Service is also prohibited on legal holidays in some states

Process Servers Every jurisdiction specifies who may serve process Many states take a simple approach and allow service by any person over the age of 18 who is not a party to the suit Under federal law service of anything other than a summons, complaint, or subpoena must be made by a U.S marshal, a deputy marshal, or someone else appointed by the court Some states also follow this procedure and designate that such qualified service shall be by a sheriff or similar peace officer

In some jurisdictions anyone who serves more than a specified small number of sum-monses a year must be licensed Laws generally provide for fines or imprisonment of a process server who fails to obtain a required license A court will not dismiss cases started with service

by an unlicensed process server

For the most part, courts have allowed process servers to use any means necessary to serve papers on reluctant defendants as long as

no law is broken For example, a process server can knock on the defendant’s door and state that he has a package for the defendant If the defendant opens the door, the resulting service

of process is valid

A defendant cannot avoid the service of process by refusing to accept delivery of the papers Many cases have upheld service where the process server dropped the papers at the defendant’s feet, hit the defendant in the chest with them, or even laid them on the defendant’s car when he refused to get out or open the door

Invalid Service The tricks of serving process papers can, however, reach a point that the courts will not tolerate because they subvert the purpose of service or threaten to disrupt the administration of justice

The most intolerable abuse is called sewer service

It is not really service at all but is so named on the theory that the server tossed the papers into the sewer and did not attempt to deliver them to the proper party Sewer service is aFRAUDon the court, and an attorney who knowingly partici-pates in such a scheme can be disbarred

Anyone who serves process must file an

AFFIDAVITof service with the court, giving details

SERVICE OF PROCESS 131

Trang 5

of the delivery of the papers If the facts in an affidavit of service falsely assert that the papers were delivered, the person who swears to them can be prosecuted for the crime of perjury In addition, the plaintiff’s action will not have commenced If the statute of limitations has expired by the time the true facts of the improper service are disclosed, the action is completely barred and the plaintiff has lost the right to sue

Service is also invalid if the defendant has been enticed into the jurisdiction by fraud

Courts have ruled that luring a potential defen-dant into the state in order to serve him with process when no other grounds exist to assert jurisdiction over him in that state violates the individual’s right to due process of law Service of process by fraud is null and void

Immunity from Service of Process Courts typically grantIMMUNITYfrom process to anyone who comes within reach of the authority

of the court only because he is required to participate in judicial proceedings The purpose

of this immunity is to ensure a fair trial by encouraging the active and willing participation

of witnesses and parties If a witness was discouraged from coming into a state because

of the risk of being sued in that state, justice would not be served

Immunity also protects nonresident attor-neys, parties, and witnesses from being served with process in unrelated actions while attend-ing, or traveling to, criminal or civil trials within

a state This immunity has been extended to protect out-of-state parties who enter a state not for trial but to settle a controversy out of court

Diplomatic personnel, ambassadors, and con-suls who are in the United States on official business are also immune from process

SERVICEMEMBERS CIVIL RELIEF ACT Congress passed the first Soldiers’ and Sailors’

Civil Relief Act in 1918 (50 App U.S.C.A § 501

et seq.) This act was designed to protect the

CIVIL RIGHTSand legal interests of individuals in the ARMED SERVICES during WORLD WAR I and ensure that they would not be distracted by legal obligations at home The act did not prevent persons from suing servicemembers Rather, it allowed a court to stay civil proceedings against them The act authorized a court to suspend legal actions against a member of the armed

forces during his time of service if the court determined that he was unable to defend himself in court because of active duty Congress passed a revised version of the act

in 1940, authorizing courts to postpone pro-ceedings against servicemembers beyond the time of active duty and until they were capable

of protecting their interests The 1940 amend-ments had three objectives concerning service-members: to suspend civil judicial actions until they could appear in court, to provide them peace of mind during their fighting, and to give them time to return home after service to protect their endangered interests Congress amended the act several times since 1940, usually to keep courts from interpreting the act too narrowly against servicemembers In addition, Congress has expanded coverage of the act to include all members of the armed forces including reservists In 2002 Congress brought members of the National Guard under the provisions of the law when“under a call to active service authorized by the President or the Secretary of Defense for a period of more than

30 consecutive days for purposes of respond-ing to a national emergency declared by the President and supported by Federal funds.” In

2003 Congress rewrote the act and renamed it the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act

The act provides servicemembers with three types of relief from judicial proceedings They may request a stay of proceedings, a reopening

of a DEFAULT JUDGMENT, or a stay of execution against a judgment To obtain any relief, a court first must find that the servicemembers’ ability

to defend their cases was affected by their service

Servicemembers may postpone proceedings during service or within 60 days after service Servicemembers or acquaintances of service-members may apply for a stay of proceedings with the court, or the court may decide on its own to issue a stay If a stay is issued, the case remains postponed until the court determines that the servicemember’s ability to defend against the suit is no longer affected by his or her military service

If servicemembers fail to obtain a stay of the proceedings and the trial court issues a default judgment, servicemembers may reopen the case To reopen a default judgment, service-members must apply with the trial court while still on active duty or within 90 days of discharge

Trang 6

Congress has allowed servicemembers to reopen

only those default judgments that were rendered

during the servicemembers’ terms of service

or within 30 days after discharge Reopening a

default judgment gives a servicemember an

opportunity to present his or her defense to the

lawsuit

If a servicemember is unable to obtain a stay

or reopen a default judgment, he or she may

stay the execution of the judgment This does

not eliminate the default judgment; rather, it

gives the servicemember time to appeal the

judgment and prevents authorities from taking

the property of the servicemember in

satisfac-tion of the judgment during the appeal process

In 2003 Congress completely revised the act

and renamed it the Servicemembers Civil Relief

Act (SCRA), Pub.L No 108-189 (2003) This

was the first complete revision of the law since

1940 The SCRA sought to clarify statutory

language, incorporate decades of judicial

inter-pretations of the act, and update the provisions

to reflect accepted practices and new

develop-ments in U.S society

FURTHER READINGS

American Bar Association 2007 The Judge Advocate

General’s School Guide to the Servicemembers Civil Relief

Act Chicago: ABA.

Cushing, Peter C 2004 “Protecting Military Families: The

New Servicemembers Civil Relief Act ” Florida Bar

Journal 78 (December).

CROSS REFERENCES

Military Law; National Guard.

SERVICEMEN’S READJUSTMENT

ACT OF 1944

See GI BILL

SERVITUDE

The state of a person who voluntarily undertakes

the role of being a servant to another or who is

involuntarily forced to be a servant to another; in

property law, a charge or burden resting upon one

estate for the benefit or advantage of another

INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE, which may be in the

form of SLAVERY, peonage, or compulsory labor

for debts, is prohibited by the THIRTEENTH

AMENDMENT to the U.S Constitution Article I,

Section 9, of the original Constitution had given

Congress the power to restrict the slave trade by

the year 1808, which it did, but slavery itself was

not prohibited until the Thirteenth Amendment was enacted in 1865 The slave trade had begun

in the American colonies in the seventeenth century and involved the forcible taking and transport of Africans and others to sell as slaves

The Thirteenth Amendment’s prohibition against slavery encompasses situations where

an individual is compelled by force, coercion, or imprisonment, and against his or her will, to labor for another, whether he is paid or not

The term servitude is also used in PROPERTY LAW In this context, servitude is used with the term easement, a right of some benefit or BENE

-FICIAL USEout of, in, or over the land of another

Although the terms servitude and easement are sometimes used as synonyms, the two concepts differ A servitude relates to the servient estate or the burdened land, whereas an easement refers to the dominant estate, which is the land benefited

by the right Not all servitudes are easements, because they are not all attached to other land as appurtenances (An APPURTENANCE is an append-age or something that belongs to something else.) All servitudes affecting lands are classified as either personal or real Personal servitudes are established for the benefit of a particular person and terminate upon the death of that individual

A common example of a personal servitude is the use of a house Real servitudes, also called

“landed servitudes,” benefit the owner of one estate through some use of a neighboring estate

AtCIVIL LAW, real servitudes are divided into two types: rural and urban Rural servitudes are established for the benefit of a landed estate;

examples include a RIGHT OF WAYover a servient tenement and a right of access to a spring, sandpit,

or coal mine Urban servitudes are established for the benefit of one building over another; some examples are a right of support, a right to a view, and a right to light Despite the name urban servitude, the buildings do not have to be in a city

Servitudes are also classified as positive and negative A positive servitude requires the owner of the servient estate to permit some-thing to be done on his or her property by another A negative servitude does not bind the servient owner in this manner but merely restrains him or her from using the property

in a manner that would impair the easement enjoyed by the owner of the dominant estate

CROSS REFERENCES Slavery; Thirteenth Amendment.

SERVITUDE 133

Trang 7

SESSION The sitting of a court, legislature, council, or com-mission for the transaction of its proper business

A session can be the period of time within any one day during which the body is assembled and engaged in business In a more extended sense, the session can be the whole space of time from the first assembling of the body to its adjournment

A joint session is the convening of the two houses of a legislative body to sit and act together

as one body, instead of separately in their res-pective houses

As applied to a court, the word session is not strictly synonymous with the word term The session of a court is the time during which it actually sits each day for the transaction of judicial business A term of a court is the period fixed by law—usually amounting to many days

or weeks—during which it is open for judicial business and during which it can hold sessions from day to day The two words are, however, frequently used interchangeably

SET ASIDE

To cancel, annul, or revoke a judgment or order

SET DOWN

To list a case in a court calendar or docket for trial

or hearing during a particular term

SET-OFF

A demand made by the defendant against the plaintiff that is based on some transaction or occurrence other than the one that gave the plaintiff grounds to sue

The set-off is available to defendants in civil lawsuits Generally, civil actions are brought by plaintiffs seeking an award of damages for injuries caused by the defendant In customary practice the plaintiff files the suit and the defendant answers it The defendant may assert

a counterclaim against the plaintiff based on an event or transaction other than the event or transaction that forms the basis of the plaintiff’s suit A set-off is a counterclaim with the particular goal of defeating or diminishing the amount the defendant will have to pay if the plaintiff’s suit succeeds

The set-off has two distinctive features It must be based on an entirely different claim from

that of the plaintiff, and it must be a valid legal claim that the defendant could bring as a separate suit For example, a stereo store sues a customer for $700 due in outstanding payments on a home theater system However, the customer’s car was damaged in the store’s parking lot when the store’s delivery van backed into it, and the repairs cost $500 As the defendant, the customer has the right to assert a counterclaim for damages to the car; if the customer is successful, the set-off reduces the amount owed to the plaintiff store so that the defendant owes the plaintiff only $200

The remedy of recoupment is similar in effect

to a set-off but differs from it in several respects Whereas a set-off is based on a different claim, recoupment is a common-law remedy based specifically on the contract between the plaintiff and defendant that gave rise to the suit It allows defendants to claim damages against the plaintiff under two conditions: where the plaintiff has not complied with some contractual obligation or where the plaintiff has violated some duty that the law imposed in the making or performance

of the contract Recoupment usually occurs in cases where the plaintiff has performed only a portion of the contract and sues for compensa-tion for the partial performance For example, the defendant in the stereo store’s action might demand recoupment for the store’s failure to service the stereo under itsWARRANTY

Like all counterclaims, set-off and recoup-ment seek to achieve justice by BALANCING the plaintiff’s and the defendant’s rights They are designed to prevent a plaintiff from recovering complete damages from a defendant who has suffered injury or damages caused by the plaintiff They can also save time and money By combining the entire controversy within one action, recoupment and set-off prevent the courts from being inundated with multiple lawsuits

SETBACK

A distance from a curb, property line, or structure within which building is prohibited

Setbacks are building restrictions imposed

on property owners Local governments create setbacks through ordinances and BUILDING CODES, usually for reasons of public policy such

as safety, privacy, and environmental protec-tion Setbacks prevent landowners from crowd-ing the property of others, allow for the safe placement of pipelines, and help to preserve

Trang 8

wetlands Setbacks form boundaries by

estab-lishing an exact distance from a fixed point,

such as a property line or an adjacent structure,

within which building is prohibited Generally,

prospective buyers learn that land is subject to

setback provisions when they are considering

purchasing it This information is important to

future development plans, because setbacks

remain in effect until changed by law or special

action of a local government

Setbacks can significantly affect a property

owner’s right to develop land or to modify

existing structures on the land For this reason

they can influence property values; severe

restrictions on land can decrease its value

Violating setback provisions can lead to legal

action against a property owner, and penalties

can include fines as well as an order to remove

noncompliant structures Property owners

whose desire to build is stymied by setbacks

have few remedies They can petition their local

government by applying for a variance—a

special permission to depart from the

require-ments of ZONINGordinances—but variances are

generally granted only in cases of extreme

hardship Litigation over setbacks is common

CROSS REFERENCE

Land-Use Control.

SETTLE

To agree, to approve, to arrange, to ascertain, to

liquidate, or to reach an agreement

Parties are said to settle an account when

they examine its items and ascertain and agree

upon the balance due from one to the other

When the person who owes money pays the

balance, he or she is also said to settle it A trust

is settled when its terms are established and it

goes into effect

The term settle up is a colloquial rather than

legal phrase that is applied to the final collection,

adjustment, and distribution of the estate of a

decedent, a bankrupt, or an insolvent corporation

It includes the processes of collecting the property,

paying the debts and charges, and remitting the

balance to those entitled to receive it

SETTLEMENT

The act of adjusting or determining the dealings or

disputes between persons without pursuing the

matter through a trial

In civil lawsuits, settlement is an alternative

to pursuing litigation through trial Typically, it occurs when the defendant agrees to some or all

of the plaintiff’s claims and decides not to fight the matter in court Usually, a settlement requires the defendant to pay the plaintiff some monetary amount Popularly called settling out of court, a settlement agreement ends the litigation Settlement is a popular option for several reasons, but a large number of cases are settled simply because defendants want to avoid the high cost of litigation Settlement may occur before or during the early stages of a trial In fact, simple settlements regularly take place before a lawsuit is even filed In complex liti-gation, especiallyCLASS ACTIONsuits or cases in-volving multiple defendants, a settlement requires court approval

Civil lawsuits originate when a claimant decides that another party has caused him or her injury and files suit The plaintiff seeks to recover damages from the defendant The defendant’s attorney will evaluate the plaintiff’s claim If the plaintiff has a strong case and the attorney believes defendant is likely to lose, the attorney may recommend that the defendant settle the case By settling, the defendant avoids the financial cost of litigating the case Trials are often extremely expensive because of the amount of time required by attorneys, and even alternatives to trials, such as mediation and

ARBITRATION, can be costly In deciding whether

to settle a claim, attorneys act as intermediaries

The parties to the suit must decide whether to offer, accept, or decline a settlement

The cost of litigation is only one factor that encourages settlement Both plaintiffs and defen-dants are often motivated to settle for other reasons For one thing litigation is frequently unpleasant The process of discovery—in which both sides solicit information from each other—

can cause embarrassment because considerable personal and financial information must be released Litigation can also have a harmful impact on the public reputation of the parties

Employers, for example, sometimes settleSEXUAL HARASSMENT claims in order to avoid unwanted media exposure or damage to employee morale

Like litigation itself, settlement is a process

Generally, the easiest time to settle a dispute is before litigation begins, but many opportunities for settlement present themselves As litigation advances toward trial, attorneys for both sides

SETTLEMENT 135

Trang 9

communicate with each other and with the court and gauge the relative strength of their cases If either of the parties believes he is un-likely to prevail, he is un-likely to offer a settlement

to the other party

Litigation ends when a settlement is reached

The plaintiff typically agrees to forgo any future litigation against the defendant, and the defen-dant agrees to pay the plaintiff some monetary amount Additionally, settlements can require the defendant to change a policy or stop some form of behavior

Often, the exact terms of settlements are not disclosed publicly, particularly in high-profile cases where the defendant is seeking to protect a public reputation In high-profile cases, settle-ments are often followed by a public statement by the defendant It is not unusual for a large com-pany to settle with a plaintiff for an undisclosed amount and then to issue a statement saying that the company did nothing wrong

In some forms of litigation, settlement is more complex In class actions, for example, attorneys represent a large group of plaintiffs, known as the class, who typically seek damages from a company or organization Courts review the terms of a class action settlement for fairness

Complexities also arise in cases involving multi-ple defendants In particular, when only some of the defendants agree to settle, the court must determine the share of liability that accrues to those defendants who choose to pursue litigation

FURTHER READINGS Menkel-Meadow, Carrie and Andrea K Schneider 2006.

Negotiation: Processes for Problem-Solving New York:

Aspen Publishers.

Practising Law Institute (PLI) 1996 Class Action Settlements,

by Roberta D Liebenberg, Ralph G Wellington, and Sherrie R Savett Corporate Law and Practice Course Handbook series: Financial Services Litigation, PLI order no B4-7153.

——— 1996 Settlement, by Norma Polizzi Litigation and Administrative Practice Course Handbook series: Liti-gation, PLI order no H4-5247.

——— 1995 Damages and Settlements in Sex Harassment Cases, by Richard G Moon Litigation and Administra-tive Practice Course Handbook series: Litigation, PLI order no H4-5213.

SETTLEMENT STATEMENT

A breakdown of costs involved in a real estate sale

Before real estate is sold, federal law requires both the buyer and seller to provide a settlement statement This official document lists all the

costs involved in the sale A settlement state-ment is typically prepared by either a lender or a third party known as an escrow agent, who must follow the regulations set forth in the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (RESPA) (12 U.S.C.A § 2601 et seq.) RESPA

is a CONSUMER PROTECTION law enforced by the federalHOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPART-MENT(HUD)

Historically, the secondary costs in real estate transactions have been expensive These costs include broker’s fees and appraiser’s fees, some of which are required by lenders in real estate deals Buyers and sellers have not always known the full extent of these costs in advance Responding to the maze of hidden costs during the early 1970s, both the secretary of HUD and the administrator

of Veterans’ Affairs petitioned Congress on behalf

of reform that would reduce the likelihood of unpleasant surprises for consumers

RESPA set forth four goals First, it attempted

to improve advance disclosure of settlement costs

to home buyers and sellers Second, it sought to eliminate corruption in the form of kickbacks or referral fees that unfairly inflate settlement costs Third, it aimed to reduce the amounts home buyers are required to deposit in an escrow account—in this case, a bank account established

to ensure the payment of real estate taxes and insurance Finally, Congress wished to modern-ize an outmoded system of local record keeping

of land title information

Besides a full accounting of sale costs, RESPA requires lenders to keep settlement statement records for five years or until they dispose of the loan It provides no civil penalties for lenders who fail to properly disclose information However, section 8, which includes anticorruption measures, sets forth criminal and civil penalties for illegal referral fees: it is designed to keep intermediaries in the deal from cheating consumers by piling

up costs

In the 1990s the scope of RESPA expanded Initially RESPA had only covered home purchase loans, but it grew to include refinances and subordinate lien loans with the enactment of the Housing and Community Development Act of

1992 (Pub L No 102-550, 106 Stat 3672) These changes took effect in 1994 after HUD amended its rules (24 C.F.R pt 3500) As a result, lenders providingEQUITYor second mort-gage loans, home improvement financing, and

Trang 10

Settlement Statement

B Type of Loan

6 File Number: 7 Loan Number: 8 Mortgage Insurance Case Number:

1  FHA 2  FmHA 3  Conv Unins.

4  VA 5  Conv Ins.

C Note: This form is furnished to give you a statement of actual settlement costs Amounts paid to and by the settlement agent are shown Items marked “(p.o.c.)” were paid outside the closing;

they are shown here for informational purposes and are not included in the totals.

D Name & Address of Borrower: E Name & Address of Seller: F Name & Address of Lender:

G Property Location: H Settlement Agent:

J Summary of Borrower's Transaction K Summary of Seller's Transaction

100 Gross Amount Due From Borrower 400 Gross Amount Due To Seller

101 Contract sales price 401 Contract sales price

103 Settlement charges to borrower (line 1400) 403.

Adjustments for items paid by seller in advance Adjustments for items paid by seller in advance

120 Gross Amount Due From Borrower 420 Gross Amount Due To Seller

200 Amounts Paid By Or In Behalf Of Borrower 500 Reductions In Amount Due To Seller

201 Deposit or earnest money 501 Excess deposit (see instructions)

202 Principal amount of new loan(s) 502 Settlement charges to seller (line 1400)

203 Existing loan(s) taken subject to 503 Existing loan(s) taken subject to

Adjustments for items unpaid by seller Adjustments for items unpaid by seller

220 Total Paid By/For Borrower 520 Total Reduction Amount Due Seller

300 Cash At Settlement From/To Borrower 600 Cash At Settlement To/From Seller

301 Gross Amount due from borrower (line 120) 601 Gross amount due to seller (line 420)

302 Less amounts paid by/for borrower (line 220) ( ) 602 Less reductions in amt due seller (line 520) ( )

303 Cash  From  To Borrower 603 Cash  To  From Seller

Section 5 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) requires the following: • HUD

must develop a Special Information Booklet to help persons borrowing money to finance the

purchase of residential real estate to better understand the nature and costs of real estate

settlement services; • Each lender must provide the booklet to all applicants from whom it

receives or for whom it prepares a written application to borrow money to finance the

purchase of residential real estate; • Lenders must prepare and distribute with the Booklet a

Good Faith Estimate of the settlement costs that the borrower is likely to incur in connection

with the settlement These disclosures are manadatory.

Section 4(a) of RESPA mandates that HUD develop and prescribe this standard form to be used at the time of loan settlement to provide full disclosure of all charges imposed upon the borrower and seller These are third party disclosures that are designed to provide the borrower with pertinent information during the settlement process in order to be a better shopper.

The Public Reporting Burden for this collection of information is estimated to average one hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

This agency may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this form, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number The information requested does not lend itself to confidentiality.

[continued]

A sample settlement statement.

SETTLEMENT STATEMENT 137

Ngày đăng: 06/07/2014, 22:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm