House of Representatives 1896 First ran for president; lost to Republican William McKinley 1898 Spanish-American War 1908 Ran for president a third time; lost to William Howard Taft 1914
Trang 1the Illinois Constitutional Convention during
1869 and 1870 As a lawyer, Browning specialized
in cases involving the Midwestern railroad system Browning died August 10, 1881, in Quincy, Illinois
BRYAN TREATIES Beginning in 1913, U.S SECRETARY OF STATE
bilateral treaties for the “Advancement of Peace.” The basic aim of these bilateral treaties was to prevent war by interjecting a conciliation process into a dispute between parties to the treaty Each signatory nominated two members, one a national and one a foreign citizen, to a permanent commission These four would then choose a fifth member who could not be a national of either state The commission would review the underlying facts to the dispute and issue a report on the controversy within one year Until the report was issued the parties agreed to refrain from resorting to hostilities It was hoped that this process and the inherent delay in issuing a report would lessen tension and preclude resort to armed force to settle the dispute, although each was free to do so after the report was issued Eventually forty-eight of these treaties were concluded, but few disputes were ever submitted to any of the commissions
vBRYAN, WILLIAM JENNINGS William Jennings Bryan was a prominent figure
in U.S politics during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and is perhaps best known for his role as assistant to the prosecution
in the famousSCOPES MONKEY TRIALof 1925
Bryan was born March 19, 1860, in Salem, Illinois His was a devoutly religious family that prayed together three times a day and stressed strict adherence to a literal interpretation of the Bible His parents, Silas Lilliard Bryan and Mariah Elizabeth Jennings Bryan, were firm believers in education His mother schooled Bryan and his siblings in their home until they were old enough to be sent away to school
Bryan was an obedient and well disciplined child who was also idealistic His favorite subject was math because of its orderly reason and logic He showed early interest in politics and public speaking, and at the age of twelve delivered a campaign speech for his father, who ran unsuccessfully for Congress It was the
beginning of a distinguished career as an orator for Bryan
In 1875 Bryan was sent to live in Jackson-ville, Illinois, to attend the Whipple Academy and Illinois College During college, he partici-pated in debate and declamation and excelled at long jumping He graduated from college in
1881 and went on to Union College of Law, in Chicago In 1883 he returned to Jacksonville and on July 4 opened a law practice He married his sweetheart of five years, Mary Elizabeth Baird, on October 1, 1884 Bryan’s young wife proved to be an intellectual match for her husband After the couple settled in Jackson-ville, she took classes at Illinois College, a practice unheard of for a married woman at the time She later studied law under Bryan’s instruction, and was admitted to the bar in Nebraska in 1888
Bryan had always yearned to go west, to test himself against the frontier In 1887 he and his wife moved to Lincoln, Nebraska, where he entered a law partnership with a friend The Bryans became active in civic affairs, and started separate discussion groups for men and women where the subject was often politics Bryan also began lecturing on religious topics In 1890, he succumbed to his interest in politics and entered his first campaign for public office He was the Democratic candidate for Congress from
a staunchly Republican district in Nebraska, but
he won the election by a comfortable margin and was reelected in 1892 He made a bid for the Senate in 1894 but was defeated He then turned
to journalism and became editor in chief of the Omaha World-Herald By this time, he had developed a reputation as a compelling speaker and was in demand for the popular Chautauqua lecture circuit (The Chautauqua movement combined education with entertainment, often offered outdoors or in a tent; it took its name from the Chautauqua Lake region in New York, where it originated.)
During his campaign for the Senate, Bryan took up the free silver cause, a political movement that advocated the free coinage of silver Free silver advocates, mainly indebted farmers in the West and South, wanted the government to issue more money, backed by silver, to ease the debts they were unable to repay because of declining farm prices The money interests in the East favored sound money and the gold standard These opposing
THE HUMBLEST
CITI-ZEN OF ALL THE LAND,
WHEN CLAD IN THE
ARMOR OF A
RIGH-TEOUS CAUSE,IS
STRONGER THAN ALL
THE HOSTS OFERROR
—W ILLIAM J ENNINGS
B RYAN
158 BRYAN TREATIES
Trang 2forces clashed in the 1896 presidential
cam-paign Bryan emerged as the nominee of four
parties: the Democratic, Populist, Silver
Repub-lican, and National Silver parties At the
Democratic National Convention in Chicago,
he made his famous “Cross of Gold” speech,
in which he cast himself as a champion of
the common person against the forces of
the powerful and privileged He passionately
declared that those he referred to as the idle
holders of money in Wall Street were
responsi-ble for the United States’ financial woes
Bryan campaigned tirelessly, traveling over
eighteen thousand miles to deliver his
electrify-ing speeches In the end, he lost to WILLIAM
vote But the foundation had been laid for his
lifelong themes: the people versus the power of
wealth, the workers versus the powerful money
holders, the farmers versus the industrial
inter-ests These themes echoed throughout his later
attempts to win the presidency
After serving as a colonel in a noncombat
position during theSPANISH-AMERICAN WAR, Bryan
ran for president again in 1900, this time on an
anti-expansion theme that was rejected by
voters By 1904 he was falling out of favor with
Democrats He waged a long and exhausting
fight to be nominated for president that year,
but in the end was content that he had at least
influenced the party platform enough so that it
included nothing he found objectionable Then
the party nominated Alton B Parker, who
promptly announced that he was in favor of a
gold standard Parker lost the election to
party’s renunciation of his free silver position, but he rebounded and was nominated for president a third time, in 1908 He ran a strong campaign but lost toWILLIAM HOWARD TAFT After the 1908 election, Bryan realized he would never be president Neverthess, he continued to influence DEMOCRATIC PARTY poli-cies, and in 1912 he supported Woodrow Wilson’s candidacy for president After Wilson was elected, he selected Bryan as his SECRETARY
years when his pacifist ideas conflicted with Wilson’s policies on U.S involvement inWORLD
William Jennings Bryan.
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
1875
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
1860 Born, Salem, Ill.
1861–65 U.S Civil War
1881 Graduated from Illinois College
1887 Moved to Lincoln, Nebr.
1890 Elected to U.S House
of Representatives
1896 First ran for president; lost to Republican William McKinley
1898 Spanish-American War
1908 Ran for president a third time; lost
to William Howard Taft
1914–18 World War I
1925 Joined Scopes trial prosecution;
died, Tennessee
1920 Volstead Act enforced Prohibition
1919 19th Amendment granted women the right to vote
1912–14 Served as secretary of state under President Wilson
1939–45 World War II BRYAN, WILLIAM JENNINGS 159
Trang 3WAR I After Bryan left the cabinet, his political influence declined rapidly
During his later years Bryan continued his work in the newspaper business and was a popular lecturer on the Chautauqua circuit
He helped gain passage of the EIGHTEENTH
helped the suffragette movement win the vote for women with passage of the NINETEENTH
During the last few years of his life, Bryan wrote numerous articles on religious topics He felt that World War I was at least partly caused by a pervasive“godlessness” sweeping the world To Bryan, this godlessness was nowhere more clearly reflected than in Darwin’s theory of the evolution
of the species Bryan traveled around the United States preaching a literal interpretation of the Bible and campaigning for laws that banned the teaching of evolution One such law, passed in Tennessee, prohibited teachers in state-supported schools and universities from teaching any theory
of the origin of human life other than the creation story contained in the Bible
In 1925 a science teacher named John Thomas Scopes violated the law and was brought
to trial Hoping for publicity, the state asked Bryan to join the prosecution He agreed, and found himself facingCLARENCE DARROW, a famous defense attorney who was a self-proclaimed atheist, an opponent ofCAPITAL PUNISHMENT, and
a defender of unpopular causes The trial quickly took on the air of a circus, with reporters and photographers from all over the world and the first live radio coverage of such an event broadcast by WGN in Chicago The media cast the proceeding as a contest between science and the Bible The defense tried to frame the issue as tolerance for new ideas Ultimately, however, the prosecution persuaded the judge to confine the case to a question of the state’s right to control public education
Sensing that he was losing control of the trial, Darrow decided to try to unravel the state’s case by calling Bryan as a witness He intended to lead Bryan away from the prosecu-tion’s carefully framed issue into a defense of fundamental biblical interpretation Bryan, whose trial experience had been limited, and who was feeling tired and ill, fell into Darrow’s trap and was ridiculed and humiliated by the flamboyant attorney’s searing and skillful ques-tions After Bryan’s TESTIMONY, the trial was
abruptly ended, depriving Bryan of the oppor-tunity to answer Darrow’s stinging offense Nevertheless, the jury deliberated a mere eight minutes before returning a guilty verdict The Scopes trial was a victory for Bryan and his supporters, but he had been devastated by Darrow He stayed in Tennessee to finalize and print the speech he had planned to use in
after the trial ended, on July 26, 1925, while still
in Tennessee, Bryan died in his sleep As a train bearing his body passed through the country-side on its way to Washington, D.C., thousands
of the “common people” Bryan had cham-pioned gathered to pay their respects The nation’s capital was in official mourning as Bryan lay in state At his request, he was buried with full military honors at Arlington National Cemetery, an ironic footnote to the life of a fervent pacifist
Although Bryan never won the country’s top office, he exerted a strong influence during his long career in public service Many of the reforms he advocated were eventually adopted, such as INCOME TAX, prohibition, women’s
own-ership, and the election of Senators by popular rather than electoral vote Although he is most often associated with the Scopes trial, his diligent devotion to the causes in which he believed is his most significant legacy
FURTHER READINGS Anderson, David D 1981 William Jennings Bryan Boston: Twayne.
Cherny, Robert W 1994 A Righteous Cause: The Life of William Jennings Bryan Norman: Univ of Oklahoma Press.
Koenig, Louis W 1971 Bryan: A Political Biography of William Jennings Bryan New York: Putnam CROSS REFERENCE
Scopes Monkey Trial.
vBRYANT, WILLIAM BENSON William Benson Bryant was a federal judge whose decisions influenced the outcomes of several famous legal battles of the 1970s Bryant was born September 18, 1911, in Wetumpka, Alabama He moved to Washing-ton, D.C., with his family when he was a child and attended District of Columbia public schools He graduated from Howard University with a bachelor of arts degree in 1932, and went
160 BRYANT, WILLIAM BENSON
Trang 4on to earn his bachelor of laws degree from
Howard University Law School in 1936 After
law school, Bryant worked for the Works
Progress Administration (WPA) and later for
the Bureau of Intelligence at the Office of War
Information He joined the U.S Army in 1943,
and attained the rank of lieutenant colonel
before his discharge in 1947
Bryant started a law practice in Washington,
D.C., in 1948 He left private practice to become
an assistant in the office of the U.S attorney for
the District of Columbia from 1951 to 1954
After resigning that post, he joined the law
firm of Houston, Bryant, and Gardner, in
Washington, D.C., where he worked from
1954 to 1965 As a criminal defense attorney,
Bryant argued and won the Supreme Court case
of Mallory v United States, 354 U.S 449, 77 S Ct
1356 (1957) Following Mallory, police could no
longer use confessions of criminal defendants
that were secured during long and unnecessary
delays between arrest andARRAIGNMENT
Bryant became a law professor at Howard
University in 1965, the same year President
bench With his appointment, Bryant became
the first African American to serve as a judge at
the federal district court level
During his tenure on the bench, Bryant
presided over several high-profile trials In May
1972 he overturned the election of W A
(“Tony”) Boyle as president of the United Mine
Workers (Hodgson v United Mine Workers of
America, 344 F Supp 17 [D.D.C.]) Boyle’s
election was challenged by supporters of his
opponent, Joseph A Yablonski, who had been
found murdered along with his wife and
daughter three weeks after he lost the 1969 election to Boyle Bryant found sufficient evi-dence of wrongdoing by Boyle and his supporters
to nullify the election He ordered the union to hold another election, to be conducted under court supervision Boyle was subsequently defeated by Arnold Miller, a Yablonski supporter, and in 1974, was convicted ofMURDERfor having ordered Yablonski’s killing
Bryant also made several key decisions regarding participants in the scandals that devastated the administration of President
Herbert L Porter, a former aide in Nixon’s reelection campaign, to 15 months in prison for lying to the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
(FBI) during its investigation of the WATERGATE
break-in and subsequent cover-up In Novem-ber 1974, he ordered White House counsel Philip W Bucher to produce audiotapes of Oval
William B Bryant.
COURTESY OF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
1911 Born,
Wetumpka,
Ala.
1914–18
World War I
1936 Graduated from Howard University Law School
1939–45 World War II
1950–53 Korean War
1961–73 Vietnam War
1943 Joined U.S Army
1948 Started private law practice in Washington, D.C.
1951 Became assistant in the office of U.S Attorney for the District of Columbia
1957 Argued
Mallory v United States before U.S.
Supreme Court
1954 Returned to private practice
1965 Joined Howard Law School faculty;
appointed to U.S
District Court for the District of Columbia
1974 Sentenced Herbert Porter, former Nixon aide, to 15 months for lying to the FBI
1989 Upheld ruling
in favor of INSLAW
in Inslaw, Inc v.
United States
1982 Assumed senior status
1995 Placed Washington, D.C jail health services
in receivership
2003 Issued ruling ending District Court’s 32-year oversight of the D.C jail
2005 William B Bryant Courthouse Annex opened to public; died, Washington, D.C.
❖
IDO NOT BELIEVE THAT TESTING VIRTUE
IS A FUNCTION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT IF,AFTER AN ILLEGAL OFFER IS MADE,THE SUBJECT REJECTS IT THE GOVERNMENT CANNOT PRESS ON
—W ILLIAM B ENSON
B RYANT
BRYANT, WILLIAM BENSON 161
Trang 5Office meetings that took place May 1–5, 1971.
The order was part of a CLASS ACTION suit brought against the U.S government on be-half of eight hundred antiwar protesters The plaintiffs alleged that government officials violated their civil liberties and suspended due process when they ordered the arrest of nearly 12,000 protesters who marched on the White House on May 1 Most of the arrests in the so-called Mayday Rally were later found to be unlawful
In 1982, after a long and distinguished career on the federal bench, Bryant attained the rank of senior judge One of his best-known decisions since then was his 1989 ruling upholding a federalBANKRUPTCYjudge’s decision
in a case involving the U.S.JUSTICE DEPARTMENT The case centered on INSLAW, a software company that had contracted with the depart-ment to provide a case-managedepart-ment software program INSLAW claimed that the department was using the software even though it had not paid for it—a situation that had forced the company into bankruptcy A federal bankruptcy judge agreed and ordered the Justice Depart-ment to pay INSLAW $8 million in damages
Bryant upheld this ruling on APPEAL; the ruling was also upheld by higher courts (although the Justice Department did get the $8 million judgment set aside)
In the 2000s Bryant continued to preside over noteworthy cases In March 2003 he issued
a ruling that ended the U.S District Court’s 32-year oversight of the D.C jail Overcrowd-ing, building safety issues, and problems with the quality of medical services for inmates led to the filing of two cases that compelled the court
to assume oversight in the 1970s: Campbell v
McGruder, 416 F.Supp 106 (D.D.C., Nov 5, 1975) (No CIV 1462-71; 2) and Inmates of
D.C Jail v Jackson, 416 F.Supp 119 (D.D.C May 24, 1976) (No CIV 75-1668) The D.C Department of Corrections worked to reverse problems at the jail by launching comprehen-sive programs to improve environmental and safety conditions and raise the standards
of medical and mental health care services
By 2002 conditions at the jail had improved significantly, and its medical and psychiatric services had achieved national accreditation Bryant’s ruling, noted D.C mayor Anthony Williams, was proof that the jail had passed“the toughest muster of the federal court system.”
In 2004 Bryant’s fellow judges unanimously recommended that the nine-courtroom annex
to the federal courthouse, then under construc-tion, be named after him, despite a D.C policy against naming buildings after people who are still alive The William B Bryant Courthouse Annex opened to the public in October 2005 Though he had to use a walker in his last years, Bryant continued to drive himself to work at the courthouse, where he joked that he felt like part of the woodwork because he had been there so long He continued to work until only a week before his death at age 94, on November
14, 2005 The previous year, Bryant had heard more cases than any other judge in the district court
FURTHER READINGS Ploski, Harry A., and James Williams, eds 1989 The Negro Almanac Detroit: Gale Research.
Spradling, Mary M., ed 1980 In Black and White Detroit: Gale Research.
Weisberg, Jacob 1990 “Computer Trouble: Another Fine Meese Mess ” New Republic (September 10).
vBRYCE, JAMES James Bryce, also known as the Viscount Bryce
of Dechmont, was born May 10, 1838, in
1850
❖
1838 Born, Belfast, Ireland
1862 Received B.A.
from Oxford University
1861–65 U.S Civil War
professorship in civil law at Oxford
1886 Served as undersecretary
of foreign affairs
1880–1907 Served as member of Parliament
1888 American Commonwealth published
1905–06 Served as chief secretary of Ireland
1913 Participated
in Hague Tribunal
1919 League of Nations formed
◆
◆
1907–13 Served as ambassador to the United States
1922 Died, Sidmouth, Devonshire, England
1921 Modern Democracies
published
162 BRYCE, JAMES
Trang 6Belfast, Ireland He attended Glasgow and
Heidelberg Universities and received a bachelor
of arts degree from Oxford University in 1862
After hisADMISSION TO THE BARin 1867, Bryce
practiced law for the next fifteen years He
accepted a professorship at Oxford in 1870,
where he taughtCIVIL LAW until 1893
Bryce entered Parliament in 1880 and
remained a member until 1907 During this
time, he also performed diplomatic duties—
serving as undersecretary of foreign affairs in
1886 and chief secretary for Ireland from 1905
to 1906 From 1907 to 1913, he acted as
ambassador to the United States
In 1913 Bryce participated at the HAGUE
established in the Netherlands AfterWORLD WAR
I, he was active in the formation of theLEAGUE OF
NATIONS
Bryce gained fame for his numerous
pub-lications, including The Holy Roman Empire:
The American Commonwealth, which was
pub-lished in 1888 and was an important work
concerning American government; and Modern
Democracies, published in 1921 He died
January 22, 1922, in Sidmouth, Devonshire,
England
vBUCHANAN, JAMES
James Buchanan achieved prominence as a
statesman and as the fifteenthPRESIDENT OF THE
UNITED STATES
Buchanan was born April 23, 1791, near
Mercersburg, Pennsylvania A graduate of
Dickinson College in 1809, Buchanan was
admitted to the Pennsylvania bar in 1812 before
serving a tour of duty in theMILITIA during the
and joined the Pennsylvania House of Repre-sentatives in 1814
In 1821 Buchanan began his career in federal politics, representing Pennsylvania in the U.S House of Representatives until 1831
Later that year, he extended his interests to the field of foreign service and performed the duties
of U.S minister to Russia for a two-year period
He returned to Congress in 1834 and repre-sented Pennsylvania in the U.S Senate for the next eleven years From 1845 to 1849, he served
as U.S.SECRETARY OF STATEand reentered foreign service in 1853 as U.S minister to Great Britain until 1856
1800
❖
◆
◆
◆
◆
1791 Born, near Mercersburg, Pa.
1809 Graduated from Dickinson College
1812–14 Served in War of 1812
1814 Elected to Pa
House of Representatives
1821 Elected to U.S House of Representatives
1834 Elected to U.S Senate
1845 Became secretary of state under President James Polk
1853–56 Served as U.S.
minister to Great Britain
1856 Elected president of the United States with strong Southern support
1868 Died, Lancaster, Pa.
1865 Lincoln assassinated 1861–65
U.S Civil War
1861 Retired from politics; Abraham Lincoln became the next president
WHAT IS RIGHT AND WHAT IS PRACTICABLE ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS
—J AMES B UCHANAN
James Buchanan.
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
BUCHANAN, JAMES 163
Trang 7Buchanan became unpopular in 1854 with his involvement in the creation of the Ostend Manifesto, which provided for the purchase by the United States of Cuba from Spain; if Spain refused to sell, the manifesto gave the United States the right to seize the country forcibly
Cuba would then become a slave state, which was viewed favorably by Southerners, but which met with vehement opposition by abolitionists
The manifesto was eventually rejected by the
As a presidential candidate in 1856, Bucha-nan adopted a moderate attitude towardSLAVERY
and worked to establish a balance between the proslavery forces and the abolitionists He believed that slavery was immoral, but that the Constitution provided for the protection of the practice in areas where it already existed
New states, he believed, should have the right to choose whether to be free or slave
He won great support from the South, and after his election Buchanan unsuccessfully attempted to reconcile the strife between the warring factions He again advocated the acquisition of Cuba and favored the admission
of Kansas as a slave state, which earned him disfavor with the northern free states The strife between North and South continued, and Buchanan was unable to prevent the SECESSION
of South Carolina that led to the outbreak of the Civil War He opposed secession but believed that he did not possess the power to compel states to remain faithful to the Union When
presi-dent in 1861 the country was ready for civil war
Buchanan retired to Pennsylvania where he died June 1, 1868, in Lancaster
vBUCHANAN, PATRICK JOSEPH Political commentator, White House appointee, and presidential candidatePATRICK JOSEPH BUCHA-NANis a leader of far-right conservatism From modest beginnings as a journalist in the early 1960s, Buchanan became an influential voice in
relations capacity under three presidents— Richard M Nixon,GERALD R.FORD, and Ronald Reagan—before running for president himself
in 1992 His hard-line positions on ABORTION,
IMMIGRATION, and foreign aid, as well as his battle cry for waging a “cultural war” in the United States, failed to wrest the nomination from George H W Bush Buchanan tried for the presidency twice more, in 1996 and 2000, but again failed to gain the support of his party Often the subject of controversy for his writings and speeches, Buchanan is the founder of a political organization called the American Cause, whose slogan is America First
Born November 2, 1938, in the nation’s capital, Buchanan was the third of nine children
of William Baldwin Buchanan and Catherine E Crum Buchanan He grew up under the shaping influences of Catholicism and conservatism, both the hallmarks of his father, a certified publicACCOUNTANT Buchanan’s brilliance at the Jesuit Gonzaga College High School earned him the honor of class valedictorian and a scholar-ship to Georgetown University In his senior
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
1938 Born,
Washington,
D.C.
1939–45 World War II
1950–53 Korean War
1961–73 Vietnam War
1961 Graduated from Georgetown University
1962 Began writing for St.
Louis Globe Dispatch
1969–73 Served
as special assistant to President Nixon
1975 Became syndicated columnist
for New York Times
1978 Joined
Chicago Tribune
News Service as syndicated columnist
1982–85 Served as panelist on CNN's
Crossfire
and PBS's
McLaughlin Group
1988 Published autobiography, Right from the Beginning; rejoined McLaughlin Group
2002 Co-founded
and edited American Conservative magazine
2008 Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War published
2000 Ran for president
as candidate of national Reform Party 1996–99
Co-host, CNN's
Crossfire
1992 Unsuccessfully challenged President Bush for Republican nomination, gave keynote speech at national convention
1996 Unsuccessfully challenged Senator Robert Dole for Republican presidential nomination
2000 Presidential election result uncertain due to disputed Florida vote count; recount halted by U.S Supreme Court with 5–4
vote in Bush v Gore
164 BUCHANAN, PATRICK JOSEPH
Trang 8year of college, the English and philosophy
major was already developing the sharp,
confrontational style that would mark his
professional life He broke his hand scuffling
with police officers over a traffic incident and
was suspended from Georgetown for a year He
nonetheless finished third in his class in 1961
He received a master’s degree in journalism
from Columbia University in 1962
Like other conservative politicians of his
generation, notably Senator JESSE HELMS (R-NC)
and President Reagan, Buchanan began with a
career in the media, which led into politics He
spent three years writing conservative editorials
for the St Louis Globe-Democrat before being
introduced to Nixon at a dinner party Nixon
soon hired the 28-year-old Buchanan as an
assistant in his law firm Buchanan wrote
speeches for Nixon’s 1968 presidential campaign,
worked as his press secretary, urged him to
choose Spiro T Agnew as a running mate, and,
after the election, became his special assistant
This last position involved reporting on what the
news media said about the administration It was
an increasingly thankless job Buchanan believed
that bad news about the VIETNAM WAR, youth
of a biased liberal media He fought back and is
widely thought to have written Vice President
Agnew’s famous antipress speech in 1969
attack-ing the “small and unelected elite” whose
opinions were critical of the president
Buchanan escaped the taint that brought
down Nixon, in part because he refused to help
Nixon aides in their so-called dirty tricks
campaign Buchanan declined to smear Daniel
Ellsberg—the former defense analyst who
leaked the classified documents known as the
Pentagon Papers to the New York Times, and
whose psychiatrist’s office Nixon aides broke
into, helping to set in motion the Watergate
scandal In fact, Buchanan later strongly
defended the president and denounced the
conspirators at U.S Senate hearings This
and, more important, as evidently knowing little
about the vast extent of the administration’s
illegalities Unlike other Nixon insiders, he did
not need to rehabilitate his reputation after
Nixon left office He remained in the White
House under President Ford until 1975
Between 1975 and 1985, Buchanan
estab-lished a national reputation He wrote a
syndicated column that criticized liberals, gays, feminists, and particularly the administration of President JIMMY CARTER He also made forays into radio and television BROADCASTING, found-ing what would later become the political debate program Crossfire on the Cable News Network (CNN) He rarely pulled punches;
liberals and even some conservatives regarded him as a reactionary, but he won an audience with his appeals to traditional values
Although he was earning a reported annual income of $400,000 for his writing and work in radio and television, Buchanan jumped at the offer to serve as director of communications during the second term of President Reagan
The job was a conservative activist’s dream:
Besides shaping Reagan’s public image, Bucha-nan had constant access to the president’s ear
Buchanan reportedly used this access to spur Reagan on to taking tougher positions—such as vetoing a farm bailout bill and lavishly praising the anti-Sandinista Contra rebels fighting in Nicaragua as“the moral equal of our Founding Fathers.”
Presidential aspirations drew Buchanan into the 1992 race He was even better known than
in the 1980s as the result of his nightly
Pat Buchanan.
AP IMAGES
BUCHANAN, PATRICK JOSEPH 165
Trang 9appearances on CNN’s Crossfire, where he sparred with his liberal colleague Michael E
Kinsley PresidentGEORGE H.W.BUSH’s popularity among Republicans was waning, especially in light of a sluggish economy Moreover, Bucha-nan offered a clearly tougher platform than Bush, whom he considered a tepid moderate
“It seemed to me that if we’re going to stand for anything,” he told the Washington Times,
“conservative leaders had to at least raise the banner and say,‘This is not conservatism.’”
Buchanan’s campaign combined populism, nationalism, and social conservatism He advocated limits on immigration, restrictions
on trade, and isolationism in foreign policy, while opposing abortion rights,GAY AND LESBIAN
had in his role as a pundit, the candidate provoked He ran TV ads featuring gay dancers, and he toured the South criticizing the Voting Rights Act (42 U.S.C.A §§ 1971 et seq.) and reassuring southerners that hanging the Confed-erate flag from public buildings was acceptable free expression
Buchanan’s critics attacked Liberals ac-cused him of xenophobia, racism, and homo-phobia Conservatives sometimes came to his defense, but not always Michael Lind, editor of the conservative journal the National Interest, wrote that Buchanan represented “conserva-tism’s ugly face.” Charges of anti-Semitism followed Buchanan’s use of the phrase “Israel and its amen corner” in attacking U.S
intervention in the Persian Gulf War, and among those critical of him was the prominent conservative author and Catholic William F
Buckley Jr Buchanan denied the charges; he said he was being tarred for supporting John Demjanjuk, who was accused, then later cleared, of being the Nazi war criminal Ivan the Terrible
Small flaps attended the Buchanan cam-paign regularly—one day he was announcing that English immigrants would assimilate better than Zulus and the next calling for beggars to
be removed from the streets The most severe criticism came in August 1992 after his speech
at the GOP national convention First he knocked the Democratic Party’s convention as
a gathering of“cross-dressers.” Then he called for a“cultural war” in which U.S citizens, like
Angeles riots, “must take back our cities, and
take back our culture, and take back our country.”
Typical of the liberal response was an editorial in the New Republic criticizing Buchanan for advocating “militarized race war” (Washington Times July 19, 1993) Mario
M Cuomo, former governor of New York, confronted Buchanan on the CBS program Face the Nation, asking, “What do you mean by
‘culture’? That’s a word they used in Nazi Germany.” William J Bennett, former secretary
of education, accused Buchanan of“flirting with fascism.” Buchanan defended himself, blaming secular humanism, Hollywood, the National Endowment for the Arts, and public schools for creating an “adversary culture” contrary to traditional values
Despite Bush’s winning the nomination handily, Buchanan’s influence did not wane Two years later, the themes of his candidacy found expression in the Contract with Amer-ica’s insistence on a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
allowing school PRAYER and in a call for a crackdown on immigration Moreover, in 1995, his“cultural war” message could be heard from nearly every Republican presidential candidate, especially Bob Dole Meanwhile, Buchanan announced a second run for the White House, campaigning on the same strong conservative positions he had advanced in his campaign in
1992 Though he stayed in the race until the end, Buchanan lost the Republican nomination for president to Dole by a large margin
In 2000, Buchanan made a third run for the presidency, this time on the Reform ticket with Ezola Foster, an African American woman Buchanan’s capture of theREFORM PARTY
nomination caused a split with supporters of party founder Ross Perot who then ran their own candidate Both candidates did poorly
at the polls winning less than one percent of the votes
During the administration of GEORGE W
BUSH, Buchanan became one of Bush’s strongest critics, strongly opposing the invasion of Iraq and taking issue with many aspects of the so-called war on terror He also criticized Bush’s approach on immigration and free trade, although he reluctantly endorsed Bush over John Kerry in 2004
Buchanan continues to be a prolific writer
He has written numerous articles and writes a nationally syndicated newspaper column His
IF WE CAN SEND AN
ARMY HALFWAY
AROUND THE WORLD
TO DEFEND THE
BORDERS OF
KUWAIT,CAN’T WE
DEFEND THE
NATIONAL BORDERS
OF THEUNITED
STATES OF
AMERICA?
—P ATRICK B UCHANAN
166 BUCHANAN, PATRICK JOSEPH
Trang 10books include Right from the Beginning (1988),
A Republic Not an Empire: Reclaiming America’s
Destiny (1999), The Death of the West: How
Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions
Imperil Our Country and Civilization (2001),
Where The Right Went Wrong (2004), State of
Emergency: The Third World Invasion and the
Conquest of America (2006), and Churchill,
Hitler, and the Unnecessary War (2008), the last
in which he caused controversy by questioning
U.S involvement in WORLD WAR II In 2009
Buchanan published Day of Reckoning: How
Hubris, Ideology, and Greed Are Tearing America
Apart, in which he argues that U.S global
domination has ended Buchanan remains a
prominent figure in the media as a political
commentator and analyst on the MSNBC cable
network, having briefly had his own show on
the network with liberal commentator Bill Press
from 2002 until 2003 He also helped start The
American Conservative magazine in 2002
FURTHER READINGS
The American Cause Web site Available online at http://
www.theamericancause.org (accessed July 9, 2009).
The American Conservative Available online at http://www.
amconmag.com (accessed November 25, 2009).
Buchanan, Patrick J Day of Reckoning: How Hubris,
Ideology, and Greed Are Tearing America Apart New
York: St Martin ’s Press.
“Patrick J Buchanan.” MSNBC News Available online
at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3080416 (accessed
Nov 25, 2009).
BUCK V BELL
In Buck v Bell, 274 U.S 200, 47 S.Ct 584, 71 L
Ed 1000 (1927), the U.S Supreme Court
upheld a Virginia state law that authorized the
forced sterilization of “feeble-minded” persons
at certain state institutions The case has been all
but expressly abrogated by later Supreme Court
opinions Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.,
considered by many to be a champion of civil
liberties, wrote the majority opinion for the
court
In 1924 the state of Virginia passed a law
that provided for the sterilization of “mental
defectives” and “feeble-minded” persons who
were confined to certain state institutions,
when, in the judgment of the superintendents
of those institutions, “the best interests of
the patients and of society” would be served
by their being made incapable of producing
offspring On January 23, 1924, a Virginia state
court adjudged 18-year-old Carrie Buck to be
“feeble-minded” within the meaning of the Virginia law and committed her to the Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble-Minded
Nine months later, A.S Priddy, then superintendent of the Virginia institution, petitioned the institution’s BOARD OF DIRECTORS
for an order compelling Buck to be sterilized by
a surgical operation known as salpingectomy (the cutting of the fallopian tubes between the ovaries and the womb, and the tying of the ends next to the womb) After giving Buck notice and the opportunity to be heard at a hearing in which evidence was presented supporting the requested order, the board of directors ap-proved the superintendent’sPETITION
Buck, her guardian, and her attorney challenged the Virginia sterilization law in the
Their lawsuit was filed against Dr J.H Bell, who had succeeded Priddy as superintendent of the institution The lawsuit raised two principle arguments
First, the suit maintained that the steriliza-tion law violated Buck’sSUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS
rights guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S Constitution The suit did not challenge the procedures by which Buck was ordered sterilized Instead, Buck and her representatives contended that the Due Process Clause guarantees all adults the constitutional right to procreate and that the Virginia law violated this right
Second, Buck’s representatives argued that the Virginia law violated the EQUAL PROTECTION
Clause of the FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, which guarantees that the law treat similarly situated people alike The sterilization law failed to provide equal protection, they argued, because
it singled out“feeble-minded” patients at only certain state institutions identified in the statute, while having no application to“feeble-minded”
persons at other state institutions or to “feeble-minded” persons who were not committed or confined
The county court upheld the Virginia law and affirmed the sterilization order, and Buck and her representatives appealed to the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, which also affirmed
Buck v Bell, 143 Va 310, 130 S.E 516 (Va
1925) In affirming the lower court, the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals said that neither the Equal Protection Clause nor the Due Process Clause were designed to interfere with the
BUCK V BELL 167