ADJUDICATIVE FACTS Factual matters concerning the parties to an administrative proceeding as contrasted with legislative facts, which are general and usually do not touch individual ques
Trang 1artificial structures or buildings on it A landowner can enforce the right to lateral support in court A lawsuit for the removal of lateral support accrues when the damage occurs, not when the excavation is done
An adjoining landowner who excavates close to his or her boundary line has a duty to prevent injury arising from the removal of the lateral support of a neighbor’s property Because the right to lateral support is considered an absolutePROPERTY RIGHT, an adjoining landowner will be liable for damages to the natural condition of the land regardless of whether or not he or she acted negligently
When, however, a landowner has erected buildings on the land, his or her right to recover for deprivation of the lateral support is differ-ent Because additional weight has been placed
on the land, thus increasing the burden on the lateral support, the landowner can be awarded damages for injuries to the building caused by excavation only if his or her neighbor has been negligent Sometimes local ordinances require that persons planning to excavate on their own property give notice to neighboring adjoining landowners so that neighbors may take preven-tive measures to protect their property The failure of landowners who receive notice to take precautions does not necessarily absolve the excavator ofLIABILITYfor NEGLIGENCE If,
howev-er, the excavator does not notify neighboring landowners, courts have treated this failure as negligence, and the excavator will be responsible for damages even though the excavating itself was not done negligently
When evidence establishes that an adjoining landowner has removed the lateral support of a neighbor’s land, the neighbor will recover damages in the amount of either the cost of restoring the property to its value before its support was removed or the cost of restoring the land to its former condition, whichever is less An injunction prohibiting further excava-tion may be granted if it poses a clear danger to contiguous lands and if it will cause irreparable damage
Subjacent Support A landowner is entitled to subjacent support, the absolute right to have one’s land supported from beneath its surface
If one person owns the surface of the land while another owns the subjacent surface, the owner
of the surface is entitled to have it remain in its natural condition without subsidence caused by
the subsurface owner’s withdrawal of subjacent materials An adjoining landowner who, during excavation, taps a subterranean stream, causing the soil of the neighbor’s land to subside, will be liable for any injuries that result The surface owner’s right to sue the subsurface owner for deprivation of subjacent support arises when the land actually subsides, not when the excavation is made
The construction of buildings on the surface
of the land does not lessen a person’s right to subjacent support It does, however, change the circumstances under which that person may recover for the removal of subsurface support
If such buildings are damaged, their owner must show that the removal of the support was done negligently
Light, Air, and View No landowner has an absolute right to light and air from or passing over adjoining property or to a view over adjoining lands Zoning laws imposed by localities may, however, require that any construction undertaken by an individual not deprive an adjoining landowner of adequate air, light, and view Similarly, many agreements such as restrictive covenants in deeds or easements affect a person’s duty toward his or her next-door neighbor’s right to air, light, and view In the absence of zoning laws or agreements, therefore, a person may build on his or her own property without regard to the fact that he or she is depriving the next-door neighbor of the light, air, and view that was enjoyed before the building was erected An exception is a structure that blocks air, light, and view for the sole purpose of injuring a neighbor—such as a “spite” fence—and which
is of noBENEFICIAL USEor pleasure to the owner Courts will generally not permit such structures Encroachments AnENCROACHMENTis an intru-sion upon the property of another without that person’s permission No person is legally entitled to construct buildings or other struc-tures so that any part, regardless of size, extends beyond that person’s property line and intrudes upon adjoining lands An encroaching owner can be required to remove the eaves of a building that overhang an adjoining lot If
he or she refuses to do so, the owner of the contiguous lot may personally remove as much of the encroachment that deprives him or her of the complete enjoyment of his or her land, but if negligent, he or she will be liable for
98 ADJOINING LANDOWNERS
Trang 2damages Should any expenses be incurred in
the removal of the encroachment from the
adjoining land, the person whose property was
encroached upon can sue the owner to recover
damages
The person whose property has been
encroached upon may sue the encroacher under
either the theory of nuisance or the theory of
TRESPASSto obtain monetary damages, or instead,
may seek an injunction against continuation of
the encroachment or to force its removal
Trees and Shrubs Landowners should not
permit trees or hedges on their property to
invade the rights of adjoining landowners If an
individual knows, for example, that a tree on his
or her property is decayed and may fall and
damage the property of another, that individual
has a duty to eliminate the danger A tree on the
boundary line of contiguous land belongs to both
adjoining landowners Each owner has an interest
identical with the portion standing on his or her
land Each can sever intruding tree branches or
roots at the boundary line of his or her property,
whether or not any injuries have been sustained
by the intrusion, but reasonable care must be
exercised so as not to kill the entire tree
FURTHER READINGS
Barlow, John R II, and Voncannon Barlow 1997 Skelton on
the Legal Elements of Boundaries & Adjacent Properties
2d ed New York: LexisNexis.
Jex, Thomas D 1998 “Alcaraz v Vece: If You Mow or
Water Your Next-Door-Neighbor ’s Yard, You Might Be
Liable for Anyone Injured There ” BYU Journal of
Public Law 13 (winter).
Merrill, Karen R 2002 Public Lands and Political Meaning:
Ranchers, the Government, and the Property between
Them Berkeley: Univ of California Press.
Perin, Constance 1977 Everything in Its Place: Social Order
and Land Use in America Princeton, NJ: Princeton
Univ Press.
Stephens, Ana Boswell 1999 “Prospecting for Oil at the
Court House: Recovery for Drainage Caused by
Secondary Recovery Operations ” Alabama Law Review
50 (winter).
CROSS REFERENCE
Land-Use Control.
ADJOURNED TERM
A continuance of a previous or regular court
session that results from postponement
When a term is adjourned, it is actually
prolonged due to a temporary putting off of the
business being conducted
ADJOURNMENT
A putting off or postponing of proceedings; an ending or dismissal of further business by a court, legislature, or public official—either temporarily
or permanently
If an adjournment is final, it is said to be
SINE DIE,“without day” or without a time fixed
to resume the work An adjournment is different from a RECESS, which is only a short break in proceedings
In legislatures, adjournment officially marks the end of a regular session Both state and federal lawmakers vote to determine when to adjourn The exact timing depends upon multi-ple factors such as work load, election schedules, and the level of comity among lawmakers
Because a session can end with unfinished legislative business, adjournment is commonly used as a means of political leverage in securing
or delaying action on important matters In the U.S Congress, where the single annual legisla-tive session usually ends in the fall, the president may call an adjournment if the House and Senate cannot agree upon a date
FURTHER READINGS Baumann, David, and Kirk Victor 2001 “Congress: Pitfalls
to Adjournment ” National Journal (November 10).
“Of Adjournment.” 2009 ChestofBooks.com Available online at http://chestofbooks.com/business/meetings/
Rules-Order-Conduct/Of-Adjournment.html; website home page: http://chestofbooks.com (accessed August
28, 2009).
Robert, Henry M 2000 Robert’s Rules of Order, Newly Revised Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
CROSS REFERENCES Congress of the United States; Legislature.
ADJUDGE
To determine by a judge; to pass on and decide judicially
A person adjudged guilty is one who has been convicted in court
ADJUDICATION The legal process of resolving a dispute The formal giving or pronouncing of a judgment or decree in a court proceeding; also the judgment or decision given The entry of a decree by a court in respect to the parties in a case It implies a hearing
by a court, after notice, of legal evidence on the factual issue(s) involved The equivalent of a determination It indicates that the claims of all
ADJUDICATION 99
Trang 3the parties thereto have been considered and set
at rest
Three types of disputes are resolved through adjudication: disputes between private parties, such as individuals or corporations; disputes between private parties and public officials; and disputes between public officials or public bodies The requirements of full adjudication include notice to all interested parties (all parties with a legal interest in, or LEGAL RIGHT
affected by, the dispute) and an opportunity for all parties to present evidence and arguments
The adjudicative process is governed by formal rules of evidence and procedure Its objective
is to reach a reasonable SETTLEMENT of the controversy at hand A decision is rendered by
an impartial, passive fact finder, usually a judge, jury, or administrative tribunal
The adjudication of a controversy involves the performance of several tasks The trier must establish the facts in controversy, and define and interpret the applicable law, or, if no relevant law exists, fashion a new law to apply to the situation
Complex evidentiary rules limit the presentation
of proofs, and the Anglo-American tradition of
STARE DECISIS, or following precedents, controls the outcome However, the process of applying established rules of law is neither simple nor automatic Judges have considerable latitude in interpreting the statutes orCASE LAWupon which they base their decisions
An age-old question that still plagues legal theorists is whether judges “make” law when they adjudicate.SIR WILLIAM BLACKSTONEbelieved that judges do nothing more than maintain and expound established law (Commentaries on
the Laws of England); other writers vehemently disagree Some legal analysts maintain that the law is whatever judges declare it to be Echoing those sentiments, PresidentTHEODORE ROOSEVELT
asserted that “the chief lawmakers in our country may be, and often are, the judges, because they are the final seat of authority Every time they interpret they necessarily enact into law parts of a system of social philosophy; and as such interpretation is fundamental, they give direction to all law-making” (Message to Congress [Dec 8, 1908]) Supreme Court Justice BENJAMIN N CARDOZO, writing in The Nature of the Judicial Process, argued that the law is evolutionary and that judges, by interpreting and applying it to specific sets of facts, actually fashion new laws Whether judges are seen as making law or merely following what came before, they are required to operate within narrow strictures Even when they are deciding a case of FIRST IMPRESSION (a question that has not previously been adjudicated), they generally try to analogize
to some existingPRECEDENT Judges often consider customs of the community; political and social implications; customs of the trade, market, or profession; and history when applying the law Some, such as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes and Justice Cardozo, thought that considerations
of social andPUBLIC POLICYare the most powerful forces behind judicial decisions
A hearing in which the parties are given an opportunity to present their evidence and arguments is essential to an adjudication Anglo-American law presumes that the parties
to the dispute are in the best position to know the facts of their particular situations and develop their own proofs If the hearing is before a court, formal rules of procedure and evidence govern; a hearing before an adminis-trative agency is generally less structured Following the hearing, the decision maker
is expected to deliver a reasoned opinion This opinion is the basis for review if the decision is appealed to a higher tribunal (a court
of appeals) It also helps ensure that decisions are not reached arbitrarily Finally, a well-reasoned opinion forces the judge to carefully think through his or her decision in order to
be able to explain the process followed in reaching it
Adjudication of a controversy generally ensures a fair and equitable outcome Because
Justice Charles Tejada
listens to arguments
during a New York
State Supreme Court
proceeding The
adjudicative process is
governed by formal
rules of evidence and
procedure.
AP IMAGES
100 ADJUDICATION
Trang 4courts are governed by evidentiary and
proce-dural rules, as well as by stare decisis, the
adjudicative process assures litigants of some
degree of efficiency, uniformity, and
predict-ability of result
FURTHER READINGS
Cardoza, Benjamin N 2009 The Nature of the Judicial
Process (1921) Whitefish, MT: Kessinger.
Lewis, William D., ed 2007 Commentaries on the Laws of
England Clark, NJ: Lawbook Exchange.
Lucy, William 1999 Understanding and Explaining
Adjudi-cation New York: Oxford Univ Press.
Roosevelt, Theodore 1908 Eighth Annual Message to
Congress In The American Presidency Project [online],
compiled by John T Woolley and Gerhard Peters.
Santa Barbara, CA: Univ of California Available online
at http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu (accessed July 3, 2009).
CROSS REFERENCES
Blackstone, Sir William; Cardozo, Benjamin Nathan;
Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr.; Judiciary.
ADJUDICATIVE FACTS
Factual matters concerning the parties to an
administrative proceeding as contrasted with
legislative facts, which are general and usually
do not touch individual questions of particular
parties to a proceeding Facts that concern a
person's motives and intent, as contrasted with
general policy issues Those facts that must be
found BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBTby the trier of
fact before there can be a conviction
Adjudicative facts, of which a trial court may
take notice if a fact is not subject to reasonable
dispute, are those to which law is applied in the
process of adjudication; they are facts that, in a
jury case, normally go to the jury
The role of a U.S court is to resolve the
dispute that has brought the parties before it
Determining what happened to whom, when
and how it happened, and what the result is or
will be, is part of the adjudicative process by
which the court reaches thatRESOLUTION These
determinations establish the ADJUDICATIVE FACTS
of the dispute
Adjudicative facts differ from ordinary facts
in that they are considered facts only if the court
recognizes and accepts them For example, a
witness mayTESTIFYthat she saw the defendant’s
car parked at a specific place at a specific time
These are the facts as she recalls them However,
the court may reject her account and instead
accept another witness’sTESTIMONYthat the
DEFEN-DANTwas driving that same car in another part of
town at the same time The second witness’s account will therefore become part of the adjudicative facts of the case, and the first witness’s recollection will be consideredIMMATERIAL Adjudicative facts are specific and unique to
a particular controversy For this reason, the fact determination in one case is not controlling
in other similar cases, even if all the cases arose from the same incident Adjudicative facts differ from LEGISLATIVE FACTS, which are general and can be applied to any party in a similar situation For example, the facts used by a court to determine the legality of a tax increase levied against a single taxpayer would be adjudicative facts particular to that taxpayer’s case By contrast, the facts used to determine the legality of a general tax increase levied against all the residents of a city would be legislative in nature Because facts can be perceived and interpreted differently by different people, the skillful lawyer is careful about what facts to present and how to present them at trial
Adjudicative facts re-create the course of events that led to the dispute They may also predict what will happen as a result For example, where one party is suing another for
PERSONAL INJURY, adjudicative facts will determine what happened, who was at fault, and what redress is appropriate for pain and suffering
Adjudicative facts will further establish what lasting consequences, such as lost future wages, the PLAINTIFF is likely to suffer and what compensation is fitting
Adjudicative facts found by the court are final and will not be reviewed on appeal except
in cases where it can be shown that the findings were made on insubstantial evidence or were clearly erroneous
FURTHER READINGS Carp, Robert A., and Ronald Stidham 1993 The Judicial Process in America 2d ed Washington, D.C.: Congres-sional Quarterly.
Fraher, Richard M 1987 “Adjudicative Facts, Non-evidence Facts, and Permissible Jury Background Information ” Indiana Law Journal 62 (spring).
“Section 201 Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts.”
Available online at http://www.mass.gov/courts/sjc/
guide-to-evidence/201.htm; website home page: http://
www.mass.gov/ (accessed August 28, 2009).
ADJUNCTION Attachment or affixing to another Something attached as a dependent or auxiliary part
ADJUNCTION 101
Trang 5Under the CIVIL LAW system that prevails in much of Europe and Latin America, adjunction
is the permanent union of a thing belonging to one person to something that belongs to someone else
A branch agency, for example, is an adjunct
of the main department or administrative agency
ADJURATION
A swearing; taking an oath to be truthful
To adjure is to command solemnly, warning that penalties may be invoked
ADJUST
To settle or arrange; to free from differences or discrepancies To bring to a satisfactory state so that parties are agreed, as to adjust amount of loss by fire
or controversy regarding property or estate To bring
to proper relations To determine and apportion an amount due The term is sometimes used in the sense
of pay, when used in reference to a liquidated claim
Determination of an amount to be paid to insured
by insurer to cover loss or damage sustained
ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME The term used for income tax purposes to describe gross income less certain allowable deductions such
as trade and business deductions, moving expenses, alimony paid, and penalties for premature with-drawals from term savings accounts, in order to determine a person’s taxable income
The rules for computing ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME for federal INCOME TAX may differ from the rules in a state that imposes a state income tax
ADJUSTER
A person appointed or employed to settle or arrange matters that are in dispute; one who determines the amount to be paid on a claim
An insurance adjuster determines the extent
of the insurance company’s LIABILITY when a claim is submitted A public adjuster is a self-employed person who is hired by litigants to determine orSETTLEthe amount of a claim or debt
ADJUSTMENT SECURITIES Stocks and bonds of a new corporation that are issued to stockholders during a corporate reorga-nization in exchange for stock held in the original corporation before it was reorganized
ADMINISTER
To give an oath, as to administer the oath of office
to the president at the inauguration To direct the transactions of business or government Immigra-tion laws are administered largely by the Immigration and Naturalization Service To take care of affairs, as an executor administers the estate of a deceased person To directly cause the ingestion of medications or poisons To apply a court decree, enforce its provisions, or resolve disputes concerning its meaning
School teachers generally are not authorized
to administer medicines that pupils take to school, for example
When divorced parents cannot agree on how to administer a visitation provision in a judgment granting CHILD CUSTODY to one of them, they might have to return to court for clarification from the judge
ADMINISTRATION The performance of executive duties in an institution
or business The Small Business Administration is responsible for administration of some disaster-relief loans In government, the practical management and direction of some department or agency in the executive branch; in general, the entire class of public officials and employees managing the executive department The management and distribution of the estate of a decedent performed under the supervision of the surrogate’s or probate court by a person duly qualified and legally appointed If the decedent made a valid will designating someone called an executor to handle this function, the court will issue that person letters testamentary as authority to do so If a person dies intestate or did not name an executor in his or her will, the court will appoint an administrator and grant him or her letters of administration to perform the duties of administration
An executor or administrator must carry out the responsibilities of administration, in-cluding collection and preservation of the decedent’s assets; payment of debts and claims against the estate; payment of estate tax; and distribution of the balance of the estate to the decedent’s heirs
ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF The OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION was established within the Executive Office of the President (EOP) by REORGANIZATION PLAN 1 of 1977
102 ADJURATION
Trang 6(implemented by EXECUTIVE ORDER 12,028, 42
Fed Reg 62, 895 [1977], issued on December
12, 1977, by PresidentJIMMY CARTER) The office
was created to help centralize the activities of all
EOP offices into a single agency The director of
the Office of Administration, who is appointed
by, and reports directly to, the president, is
responsible for, according to Executive Order
12,028, “ensuring that the Office of
Adminis-tration provides units within the Executive
Office of the President common administrative
support and services.”
The Office of Administration provides
ad-ministrative support services to all EOP offices in
the White House, including services that are in
direct support of the president The services
provided by the Office of Administration include
personnel management; financial management;
data processing; and office operations, including
the handling of mail (except for presidential
mail), messenger service, printing and
duplica-tion, graphics, word processing, procurement,
and supply The office also oversees three
libraries (not open to the general public): a
general reference library in the New Executive
Office Building, and a reference library and a law
library in the Old Executive Office Building
The Office of Administration consists of
nearly two hundred full- and part-time
employ-ees who maintain accounts for all EOP offices;
recruit employees (except for those who will
staff the Office of Policy Development and
the White House, all of whom are political
appointees); and maintain official records,
including those of the White House In addition
to the director and an assistant director, the office is managed by three deputy assistant directors, who provide supervision in the areas
of general services, information management, and resources management
The Office of Administration also manages the Preservation Office, which has initiated and overseen several restoration projects, such as the award-winning restoration of the slate and cast iron roof and the restoration of the three Department libraries originally occupying the Eisenhower Executive Office Building that cur-rently houses the Office of Administration In all the projects that are completed, the work is monitored to ensure consistency with preservation criteria In 1988 Congress enacted legislation to allow the Office of Administration to accept gifts and loans for preservation activities so as to shift the expense to public and private partnerships
FURTHER READING Administration Office Website Available online at www.
whitehouse.gov/oa (accessed September 22, 2009).
CROSS REFERENCE President of the United States.
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS Whatever actions are necessary to carry out the intent of statutes; those acts required by legislative policy as it is expressed in laws enacted by the legislature
If a city commission votes to create the position of park superintendent, that is a legislative act that can take effect only if the
Office of Administration
General Counsel
Director's Office
Security
Customer Service Bureau
Equal
Employment
Opportunity
Financial Management
Human Resources Management
Facilities Management
General Services
Information Systems and Technology
Library and Research Services
Operations and Legislative Liaison
ILLUSTRATION BY GGS CREATIVE RESOURCES REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF GALE,
A PART OF CENGAGE LEARNING.
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS 103
Trang 7commission follows all the steps required for formal legislation When the same commission votes to rezone a parcel of real property from single-family residential to business uses, how-ever, that is an administrative act that does not require the same formality as legislation It is administrative because it is carrying out the zoning laws already in effect
ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION The process by which an administrative agency issues an order, such order being affirmative, negative, injunctive, or declaratory in form
Most formal proceedings before an admin-istrative agency follow the process of either rule making or adjudication Rule making formu-lates policy by setting rules for the future conduct of persons governed by that agency
Adjudication applies the agency’s policy to the past actions of a particular party, and it results
in an order for or against that party Both methods are strictly regulated by the law of administrative procedure
CROSS REFERENCES Administrative Law and Procedure.
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY
An official governmental body empowered with the authority to direct and supervise the imple-mentation of particular legislative acts In addi-tion to agency, such governmental bodies may be called commissions, corporations (e.g., Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation), boards, depart-ments, or divisions
Administrative agencies are created by the federal Constitution, the U.S Congress, state legislatures, and local lawmaking bodies to manage crises, redress serious social problems,
or oversee complex matters of governmental concern beyond the expertise of legislators
Although Article I, Section 1, of the federal Constitution plainly states that “[a]ll legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States,” the “necessary-and-proper” clause, in the eighth section of the same article, states that Congress shall have power “[t]o make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers in any Department or Officer thereof.” With this language, many have argued that the Framers of the Constitution expected,
indeed encouraged, the creation of powerful administrative agencies This argument pre-vailed, and courts therefore have allowed the U.S Congress—and other legislative bodies—to make laws that delegate limited lawmaking authority to administrative agencies The sub-stance of an administrative agency’s powers must be intelligible, and a system of controls must be in place to limit those powers, but courts almost always find that administrative agencies meet these requirements
Administrative agency rules and regulations often have the force of law against individuals This tendency has led many critics to charge that the creation of agencies circumvents the constitutional directive that laws are to be created by elected officials According to these critics, administrative agencies constitute an unconstitutional, bureaucratic fourth branch
of government with powers that exceed those
of the three recognized branches (the legislative, executive, and judiciary) In response, suppor-ters of administrative agencies note that agen-cies are created and overseen by elected officials
or the president Agencies are created by an
ENABLING STATUTE, which is a state or federal law that gives birth to the agency and outlines the procedures for the agency’s rule making Furthermore, agencies include the public in their rule-making processes Thus, by PROXY, agencies are the will of the electorate
Supporters of administrative agencies note also that agencies are able to adjudicate relatively minor or exceedingly complex dis-putes more quickly or more flexibly than can state and federal courts, which helps preserve judicial resources and promotes swift resolu-tions Opponents argue that swiftness and ease
at the expense of fairness are no virtues, but while the debate continues, administrative agencies thrive
Governmental representation in an admin-istrative capacity of any kind can be considered administrative agency The president is an administrative agent whose enabling statute
is the federal Constitution The 13 executive departments reporting to the president are administrative agencies For example, the DE-PARTMENT OF JUSTICE is a cabinet-level executive department, but it functions as the administra-tive agency that addresses the legal concerns of the U.S government and its people The departments housed within the Department of
104 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION
Trang 8Justice, such as the DRUG ENFORCEMENT
ADMINIS-TRATIONand theFEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,
are also administrative agencies, and they have
procedures and rules of their own
An administrative agency that falls under
the direction of theEXECUTIVE BRANCHis referred
to as an executive agency However, an enabling
statute may establish an independent agency,
commission, or board, which does not fall
under the direction of the president The
primary distinction between an executive agency
and an independent agency is that the statute
creating an independent agency typically
pre-cludes the president from removing the head of
the agency without cause By contrast, a head of
an executive agency generally serves at the
pleasure of the president The U.S Supreme
Court on several occasions has considered
whether independent agencies are constitutional
In Humphrey’s Executor v United States, 295
U.S 602, 55 S Ct 869, 79 L Ed 1611 (1935),
the Court held the President FRANKLIN D
ROOSEVELTcould not remove the commissioner
of theFEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION(FTC) without
cause The statute that created the commission
permitted removal of the commissioner only
for inefficiency, neglect of duty, orMALFEASANCE
of office Roosevelt purported to remove FTC
Commissioner William E Humphrey, who had
been nominated by PresidentHERBERT C.HOOVER
to a seven-year term in 1931, in order to replace
Humphrey with an individual of Roosevelt’s
own selection The Court held that because
Humphrey was not an executive officer, the
president could not remove him from office
except for the causes set forth in the statute
Many of the administrative agencies that
affect everyday activities are independent
agen-cies Among the numerous examples of
inde-pendent agencies are the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, the
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, and the
SECURI-TIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Because the
president is generally able to appoint the chairs
or fill vacancies within these agencies, the
president is often able to influence their
acti-vities, notwithstanding the limitation on the
removal of the heads of the agencies
Administrative agencies are made up of
experts in the field in which the agency
operates For example, the Maritime
Adminis-tration employs experts in the areas of sea
commerce and navigation to set its rules on
merchant marine activities Many agencies have the power to assess fines or otherwise deprive persons of liberty in hearings conducted by their own judicial bodies, or administrative boards
Given the specialized knowledge within admin-istrative agencies, adminadmin-istrative law judges (ALJs), who hear agency claims and disputes, are loath to overturn the legal conclusions reached by administrative boards Determina-tions and sancDetermina-tions made by ALJs are subject to review by state or federal courts, but a party must exhaust all appeals within the agency before suing in civil court
An agency’s actions must be in accordance with its enabling statute, and courts will examine the agency records to determine whether the agency exceeded its lawmaking or judicial powers Rigorous judicial oversight of agencies would defeat a cherished feature of administrative agency by eliminating agency flexibility in resolving conflicts To avoid this outcome, most enabling statutes are worded vaguely, in such a way as to allow the agencies
The National Recovery Administration was created in the 1930s
to ensure fair market competition It was one of numerous agencies created by Congress during the Great Depression in
an effort to regulate the production and marketing of goods.
AP IMAGES ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY 105
Trang 9broad discretion in determining their rules and procedures To keep agencies from wielding unbridled power, the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 (APA) (5 U.S.C.A § 551 [1982]) sets standards for the activities and rule making
of all federal regulatory agencies The APA provides federal courts with a framework for reviewing the rules made and procedures used by administrative agencies Individual states have similar statutes to guide their own courts
History of Administrative Agency
The first administrative agency was created by Congress in 1789 to provide pensions for wounded Revolutionary War soldiers Also in the late 1700s, agencies were created to deter-mine the amount of duties charged on imported goods, but it was not until 1887 that the first permanent administrative agency was created
The INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION (ICC), created by the INTERSTATE COMMERCE ACT (49 U.S.C.A § 10101 et seq.[1995]), was enacted by Congress to regulate commerce among the states, especially the interstate transportation
of persons or property by carriers The ICC was designed to ensure that carriers involved in interstate commerce provided the public with fair and reasonable rates and services To buttress the Interstate Commerce Act, the Federal Reserve System was established by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (12 U.S.C.A § 221)
to serve as the United States’ central bank and execute U.S monetary policy One year later, the Federal Trade Commission was established
by Congress to promote free and fair competi-tion in interstate commerce by preventing unfair methods of competition
In 1908 the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was established to investigate violations of federal laws not assigned to other federal agencies The FBI is charged with solving crimes such as KIDNAPPING, ESPIONAGE, SABOTAGE, bank
ROBBERY, extortion, interstate transportation of stolen property, CIVIL RIGHTS violations, inter-state gambling violations, FRAUD against the government, and the ASSAULT or killing of a federal officer or the president As an agency concerned with criminal apprehension, the FBI
is considered an arm of the government, and its directorship is subject to presidential approval
However, the FBI carries out its investigations independent of political influence It can, for
example, probe the actions of presidents and legislators, the very persons responsible for its existence
Administrative agencies are usually created
in response to a felt public need Some older agencies, for example, were created after the Civil War to address economic matters critical
to the United States’ expanding government After the STOCK MARKETcrash of October 1929, and during the Great Depression of the 1930s, Congress created numerous agencies in an effort to regulate the production and marketing
of goods Agencies such as the SOCIAL SECURITY
Administration (created by the SOCIAL SECURITY ACT OF 1935 [42 U.S.C.A § 301 et seq.]), the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corpora-tion (established by a 1933 amendment to the Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C.A § 264, and now codified at 12 U.S.C.A §§ 1811–1831) helped provide financial security for many Americans The National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) (15 15 U.S.C.A §§ 701 et seq., 40 U.S.C.A §
401 et seq.) created the NATIONAL RECOVERY ADMINISTRATION to ensure fair market competi-tion However, the NIRA gave the president limitless authority to impose sanctions, and it was declared invalid by the Supreme Court in the “Sick Chicken” case, SCHECHTER POULTRY CORP.V UNITED STATES, 295 U.S 495, 55 S Ct
837, 79 L Ed 1570 (1935) The National Labor Relations Board (created by the National Labor Relations Act of 1935[29 U.S.C.A § 151 et seq.], later amended by acts of 1947 and 1959) also helped to ease the devastating effects of the depression, by protecting employees’ rights to organize, preventing unfair labor practices, and promoting COLLECTIVE BARGAINING between employers and labor unions
Congress installed the Federal Radio Com-mission (FRC) in 1927 after entrepreneurs discovered the commercial potential of radio airwaves In 1934 the FRC was merged into theFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC), which was created by the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.A § 151 et seq.) to tackle the myriad issues presented by the sudden widespread use of radio waves In the wake of television’s popularity, the Com-munications Satellite Act of 1962 (47 U.S.C.A
§§ 701–744) was enacted by Congress to broaden the FCC’s powers to include re-gulation of television broadcasting; telephone, telegraph, and cable television operation;
106 ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY
Trang 10two-way radio and radio operation; and satellite
communication
When the United States enteredWORLD WAR II,
more agencies were created or enlarged to
mobilize human resources and production and
to administer price controls and rationing The
social upheaval of the 1960s spawned agencies
designed to improve urban areas, provide
opportunities for people who were historically
disadvantaged and marginalized, and promote
artistic endeavors In the 1970s, 1980s, and
1990s, pressing issues such as human and
environmental health were addressed through
the creation of agencies such as the
ENVIRON-MENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYand a new, enlarged
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Administrative Agencies
On the federal level, business and individual
matters are addressed by such agencies as the
FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION,SMALL BUSINESS
ADMIN-ISTRATION,COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION,
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,FEDERAL DEPOSIT
INSUR-ANCE CORPORATION, OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION,
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF
COM-MERCE, INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, and
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Governmental money matters are overseen
and assisted by the GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE,
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency,TREASURY DEPARTMENT,
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, CONGRESSIONAL
BUDGET OFFICE, andFEDERAL RESERVE BOARD
Public services are handled by
administra-tive agencies that include the DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
En-vironmental Protection Agency,FOOD AND DRUG
ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HU-MAN SERVICES,DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR,
IMMIGRA-TION and NATURALIZATION service, and National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Work-related administrative agencies
in-clude the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, Office of
Technology Assessment, Occupational Safety
and Health Administration, Occupational Safety
and Health Review Commission, National
Labor Relations Board, Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Mine Safety and Health Review
Commission, MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPOR-TUNITY COMMISSION, and Office of Personnel
Management
Police and military functions are served by the Central Intelligence Agency, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Department of Justice, Department of Veterans Affairs, Federal Bureau of Investiga-tion, andNATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL
The administrative agency that directly affects the most U.S citizens is the Social Security Administration (SSA) The SSA collects contributions from workers and pays out cash benefits when a worker retires, dies, or becomes disabled
As the needs of the nation change, Congress continues to establish new agencies and abolish existing agencies The Interstate Commerce Commission, for instance, was established in
1887 to regulate carriers engaged in the transportation of interstate and foreign com-merce in the United States Over time, many of the commission’s functions were transferred to other agencies or otherwise abandoned, and Congress abolished the commission in 1995 A more recent example of the development of an administrative agency is the creation of HOME-LAND SECURITY DEPARTMENT in 2002 to prevent terrorist attacks in the United States and to reduce the country’s vulnerability to TERRORISM
in the aftermath of the SEPTEMBER11TH ATTACKS
State and Local Administrative Agencies
State and local administrative agencies often mirror federal agencies Thus, the individual states have agencies that control transportation, public health, public assistance, education, natu-ral resources, labor, law enforcement, agricul-ture, commerce, and revenue Any regulation established by such an agency that conflicts with
a federal regulation will not be legally valid, but this fact does not keep state agencies from developing regulations that differ from those promulgated by their federal counterparts In the spirit of administrative agency, state and local governments also create agencies that help address compelling, peculiarly local concerns
Just like federal agencies, state and local administrative agencies are often empowered to hold hearings These hearings are conducted by their administrative boards, which are obligated
to represent the PUBLIC INTEREST By contrast, courts must remain impartial to the two parties before them APAROLEboard, for example, holds informal hearings during which prisoners are
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY 107