1. Trang chủ
  2. » Kỹ Thuật - Công Nghệ

AircrAircraft Flight Dynamics Robert F. Stengel Lecture5 Configuration Aerodynamics 1

13 334 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Configuration Aerodynamics - 1
Tác giả Robert Stengel
Trường học Princeton University
Chuyên ngành Aircraft Flight Dynamics
Thể loại lecture
Năm xuất bản 2012
Thành phố Princeton
Định dạng
Số trang 13
Dung lượng 1,65 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

~ mean geometric chord" • Axial location of the wing s subsonic aerodynamic center a.c." – Determine spanwise location of m.a.c." – Assume that aerodynamic center is at 25% m.a.c...

Trang 1

Configuration Aerodynamics - 1

Robert Stengel, Aircraft Flight Dynamics,

MAE 331, 2012!

  Configuration Variables"

  Lift"

–  Effects of shape, angle, and

Mach number"

–  Stall"

  Parasitic Drag"

–  Skin friction"

–  Base drag"

Copyright 2012 by Robert Stengel All rights reserved For educational use only.!

http://www.princeton.edu/~stengel/MAE331.html !

http://www.princeton.edu/~stengel/FlightDynamics.html !

Description of Aircraft

Configuration

Republic F-84F"

•   Aspect Ratio "

•   Taper Ratio "

λ = c tip

c root =

tip chord root chord

AR = b

c rectangular wing

=b × b

c × b=

b2

S any wing

•   Rectangular Wing " •   Delta Wing " •   Swept Trapezoidal Wing "

Trang 2

Mean Aerodynamic Chord and

Wing Center of Pressure"

c =1

2

y

( )dy

−b 2

b 2

= 2 3

#

$%

&

'(

1 + λ + λ 2

1 + λ c root [for trapezoidal wing]

from Raymer!

•   Mean aerodynamic chord (m.a.c.) ~ mean geometric chord"

•   Axial location of the wing s subsonic

aerodynamic center (a.c.)"

–   Determine spanwise location of m.a.c."

–   Assume that aerodynamic center is at

25% m.a.c "

from Sunderland!

Trapezoidal Wing"

Elliptical Wing"

Mid-chord ! line!

Medium to High Aspect Ratio Configurations"

Cessna 337! DeLaurier Ornithopter! Schweizer 2-32!

•   Typical for subsonic aircraft "

Boeing 777-300!

M typical = 75 mph!

h max = 35 kft!

M cruise = 0.84!

h cruise = 35 kft!

V takeoff = 82 km/h!

h cruise = 15 ft!

V cruise = 144 mph!

h cruise = 10 kft!

Low Aspect Ratio Configurations"

North American A-5A Vigilante"

•   Typical for supersonic aircraft " Lockheed F-104 Starfighter"

M max = 1.25!

h ceiling = 53 kft!

M max = 2!

h ceiling = 52 kft!

M cruise = 1.4!

h creiling= 50 kft!

Variable Aspect Ratio Configurations"

General Dynamics F-111!

North American B-1!

•   Aerodynamic efficiency at sub- and supersonic speeds "

M cruise = 0.9!

M max = 1.25!

h cruise = 50 kft!

M max = 2.5!

h ceiling = 65 kft!

Trang 3

Sweep Effect on Thickness Ratio "

Grumman F-14!

from Asselin!

Reconnaissance Aircraft"

Lockheed U-2 (ER-2)" Lockheed SR-71 Trainer"

•   Subsonic, high-altitude flight " •   Supersonic, high-altitude flight "

M cruise = 3!

h cruise = 85 kft!

V cruise = 375 kt!

h cruise = 70 kft!

Uninhabited Air Vehicles"

Northrop-Grumman/Ryan Global Hawk" General Atomics Predator"

V cruise = 70-90 kt!

h cruise = 25 kft!

V cruise = 310 kt!

h cruise = 50 kft!

Stealth and Small UAVs"

Lockheed-Martin RQ-170" General Atomics Predator-C (Avenger)"

InSitu/Boeing ScanEagle"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stealth_aircraft!

Northrop-Grumman X-47B"

Trang 4

Lifting Body Re-Entry Vehicles"

Northrop HL-10"

Martin Marietta X-24A"

Northrop M2-F2"

Martin Marietta X-24B"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K13G1uxNYks !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCZNW4NrLVY!

Subsonic Biplane"

–   Structurally stiff (guy wires)"

–   Twice the wing area for the same span"

–   Lower aspect ratio than a single wing with same area and chord"

–   Mutual interference"

–   Lower maximum lift"

–   Higher drag (interference, wires) "

•   Interference effects of two wings"

–   Gap"

–   Aspect ratio"

–   Relative areas and spans"

–   Stagger"

Aerodynamic Lift and Drag

Longitudinal Aerodynamic Forces and Moment of the Airplane"

Lift = C L q S Drag = C D q S Pitching Moment = C q Sc

•   Non-dimensional force coefficients are dimensionalized

by "

–   dynamic pressure,q"

–   reference area,S"

•   Non-dimensional moment coefficients also dimensionalized by "

–   reference length,c!

Typical subsonic lift, drag, and pitching moment variations with angle of attack"

Trang 5

Circulation of Incompressible Air Flow

•   Bernoulli s equation (inviscid, incompressible flow)"

p static+1

2ρV

2

= constant along streamline = p stagnation

•   Vorticity" V upper (x) = V+ ΔV (x) 2

V lower (x) = V− ΔV (x) 2

γ2 − D (x) = ΔV (x)

Δz(x)

•   Circulation"

Γ2 − D = γ2 − D (x)dx

0

c

What Do We Mean by 
 2-Dimensional Aerodynamics?"

•   Finite-span wing –> finite aspect ratio"

AR = b

c rectangular wing

=b × b

c × b=

2

S any wing

•   Infinite-span wing –> infinite aspect ratio"

What Do We Mean by

2-Dimensional Aerodynamics?"

Lift 3− D = C L 3− D1

2ρV2

S = C L 3− D

1

2ρV2

bc

( ) [Rectangular wing]

Δ Lift( 3− D)= C L 3− D1

2ρV2

cΔy

lim

Δy→0 Δ Lift( 3− D) = lim

Δy→0 C L 3− D1

2ρV2

cΔy

%

&'

( )*⇒ "2-D Lift"= C L 2− D

1

2ρV2

c

•   Assuming constant chord section, the 2-D Lift is

the same at any y station of the infinite-span wing"

For Small Angles, Lift is Proportional to Angle of Attack"

•   Unswept wing, 2-D lift slope coefficient"

–   Inviscid, incompressible flow"

–   Referenced to chord length, c, rather than wing area "

2−D= α ∂C L

∂α

$

%

& ' (

)

2−D

=α C( )Lα 2−D= 2π ( ) α [Lifting-line Theory]

•   Swept wing, 2-D lift slope coefficient"

–   Inviscid, incompressible flow "

2− D = C( )Lα 2 − Dα = 2π cos Λ ( ) α

Trang 6

Classic Airfoil

Profiles"

•   NACA 4-digit Profiles (e.g., NACA 2412)"

–   Maximum camber as percentage of chord ( 2 )"

–   Distance of maximum camber from leading

edge, ( 4 ) = 40%"

–   Maximum thickness as percentage of chord ( 12 )"

–   See NACA Report No 460, 1935 , for lift and drag

characteristics of 78 airfoils"

NACA Airfoils!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NACA_airfoil !

•   Clark Y (1922): Flat lower surface, 11.7%

thickness"

–   GA, WWII aircraft"

–   Reasonable L/D"

–   Benign computed stall characteristics, but

experimental result is more abrupt"

Fluent, Inc, 2007!

Clark Y Airfoil!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clark_Y !

Relationship Between Circulation and Lift"

•   2-D Lift (inviscid, incompressible flow)"

Lift

( )2 − D= ρ ∞V∞ ( ) Γ2 − D

1

2ρ∞V∞2c 2( πα ) [thin, symmetric airfoil] + ρ ∞V∞( Γcamber)2 − D

1

2ρ∞V∞ 2

c C( )Lα 2 − Dα + ρ ∞V∞ ( Γcamber)2 − D

Talay, NASA SP-367!

•   Positive camber "

•   Neutral camber "

•   Negative camber "

Göttingen 387!

NACA 0012!

Whitcomb! Supercritical!

Aerodynamic Strip Theory"

•   Airfoil section may vary from tip-to-tip"

–   Chord length"

–   Airfoil thickness"

–   Airfoil profile"

–   Airfoil twist "

•   Lift of a 3-D wing is found by integrating 2-D lift

coefficients of airfoil sections across the finite span"

•   Incremental lift along span"

Aero L-39 Albatros!

dL = C L 2− D( )y c y( )qdy

•   3-D wing lift"

L 3− D= C L

2− D( )y c y( )q dy

−b /2

b /2

Effect of Aspect Ratio on Wing

Lift Slope Coefficient

•   Airfoil section lift coefficients and lift slopes near wingtips are lower than their estimated 2-D values"

Trang 7

Effect of Aspect Ratio on 3-Dimensional Wing Lift Slope Coefficient

(Incompressible Flow)!

•   High Aspect Ratio (> 5) Wing "

C L

∂α

#

$

'

(

3−D

AR + 2 = 2π

AR

AR + 2

#

$

' (

•   Low Aspect Ratio (< 2) Wing "

C Lα = πAR

AR

4

#

$

' (

All wings at M = 1!

Dash 8!

Wing Lift Slope Coefficient

•   All Aspect Ratios (Helmbold equation)"

2

#

$

% &

' (

2

)

*

+ +

,

- .

HL-10!

Q400!

For Small Angles, Lift is Proportional to Angle of Attack"

Lift = C L1

V

2

S ≈ C L0+∂C L

∂α α

%

&'

( )*

1

V

2

S ≡ C%& L0 +C Lαα ()12ρV2S where C L

α = lift slope coefficient

•   At higher angles, "

•   Flow separation

produces stall "

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgUtFm93Jfo!

Aerodynamic Estimation and Measurement

Trang 8

Handbook Approach to

•  Build estimates from component effects"

http://www.pdas.com/datcomb.html)"

Interference Effects Interference

Effects Wing Aerodynamics

Fuselage Aerodynamics

Tail Aerodynamics

Interference Effects

–   Full-scale aircraft on balance"

–   Sub-scale aircraft on sting"

–   Sub-scale aircraft in free flight"

–   Maximum airspeed = 118 mph"

–   Constructed in 1931 for $37M (~

$500M in today s dollars)"

–   Two 4000-hp electric motors "

Blended Wing-Body Model in Free Flight!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7zMkptajMQ !

Full-Scale P-38!

Sub-Scale Learjet!

Sub-Scale F/A-18!

Sting Balance!

High-Angle-of-Attack ! Sting Balance!

Texas A&M!

NACA Free Flight Wind Tunnels"

•   Test section angle and airspeed adjusted to gliding flight path angle and airspeed"

12-ft Free Flight Wind Tunnel!

http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/12-Foot_Low_Speed_Tunnel !

5-ft Free Flight Wind Tunnel!

Model in 12-ft Free-Flight Tunnel!

http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/videogallery/index.html?collection_id=16538&media_id=17245841 !

Trang 9

Interpreting Wind Tunnel Data!

•  Wall corrections , uniformity of the

flow, turbulence, flow recirculation,

temperature, external winds (open

circuit)"

•  Open-throat tunnel equilibrates

pressure"

•  Tunnel mounts and balances : struts,

wires, stings, magnetic support"

•  Simulating power effects ,

flow-through effects, aeroelastic

deformation, surface distortions"

•  Artifices to improve

reduced/full-scale correlation, e.g., boundary layer

trips and vortex generators"

Full-Scale F-84!

Full-Scale P-51 Fuselage!

Sub-Scale ! Supersonic Transport!

•  Strip theory"

and moment estimates over wing

•  3-D calculations at grid points"

modeling"

vorticity) at points or over panels of aircraft surface"

  Euler equations neglect viscosity"

  Navier-Stokes equations do not"

Aerodynamic Stall, Theory and Experiment"

Anderson et al, 1980!

•   Flow separation produces stall"

•   Straight rectangular wing, AR = 5.536, NACA 0015"

•   Hysteresis for increasing/decreasing α!

Angle of Attack for

C L max !

Maximum Lift of Rectangular Wings"

Schlicting & Truckenbrodt, 1979!

Aspect Ratio"

Maximum"

Lift "

Coefficient,"

C L max !

ϕ : Sweep angle δ: Thickness ratio

Trang 10

Maximum Lift of Delta Wings with

Straight Trailing Edges"

δ: Taper ratio

Aspect Ratio"

Angle of Attack for CL max !

Maximum Lift "

Coefficient, CL max !

Aspect Ratio"

Schlicting & Truckenbrodt, 1979!

Large Angle Variations in Subsonic

•   All lift coefficients have at least one maximum (stall condition)"

•   All lift coefficients are essentially Newtonian at high

!"

•   Newtonian flow:

TBD "

Flap Effects on Aerodynamic Lift"

other control surfaces"

–   Elevator (horizontal tail)"

–   Ailerons (wing)"

–   Rudder (vertical tail) "

Subsonic Air Compressibility and Sweep Effects on 3-D Wing Lift Slope"

•   Subsonic 3-D wing, with sweep effect "

2 cos Λ 1 4

$

%

&& '

( ))

2

1−M2

cos Λ 1 4

+ ,

- /

0 0 0

Λ1 4 = sweep angle of quarter chord

Trang 11

Supersonic Compressibility Effects on

Triangular Wing Lift Slope"

•   Supersonic delta (triangular) wing "

− 1

Supersonic leading edge"

C Lα =2π

2

cot Λ

π + λ

where λ= m 0.38 + 2.26m − 0.86m( 2)

m = cot Λ LE cot σ

Subsonic leading edge"

ΛLE = sweep angle of leading edge

Supersonic Effects on Arbitrary Wing

and Wing-Body Lift Slope"

•   Impinging shock waves"

•   Discrete areas with differing M and local pressure coefficients, c p !

•   Areas change with α!

•   No simple equations for lift slope "

Schlicting & Truckenbrodt, 1979!

Wing-Fuselage Interference Effects"

–   Upwash in front of the wing"

–   Downwash behind the wing, having major effect on the tail"

and tail"

from Etkin!

Aerodynamic Drag"

Drag = C D 1

2

S ≈ C D0 + εC L2

S

≈ C D0 + ε(C L o + C Lαα)2

%

1

2

S

Trang 12

Parasitic Drag"

•   Pressure differential, viscous shear stress, and separation "

V

2

S

Talay, NASA SP-367!

Reynolds Number and Boundary Layer"

Reynolds Number = Re = ρVl

Vl

ν

where

ρ = air density

V = true airspeed

l = characteristic length

µ = absolute (dynamic) viscosity

ν = kinematic viscosity

Reynolds Number,

Skin Friction, and

Boundary Layer"

  Skin friction coefficient for a flat plate"

C f = Friction Drag

qS wet where S wet = wetted area

C f ≈ 1.33Re−1/2 [laminar flow]

≈ 0.46 log( 10 Re)−2.58

turbulent flow

•  Boundary layer thickens in transition,

then thins in turbulent flow"

Wetted Area: Total surface area of the

wing or aircraft, subject to skin friction"

Typical Effect of Reynolds Number on Parasitic Drag"

from Werle*!

•   Flow may stay attached farther at high Re, reducing the drag"

Trang 13

Effect of Streamlining on Parasitic Drag"

Talay, NASA SP-367!

Some Videos"

downstream vortices"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsO5BQA_CZk!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0z_hFZx7qvE!

•   Flow over transverse flat plate, with downstream vortices"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WG-YCpAGgQQ&feature=related!

•   Laminar vs turbulent flow"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNBZBChS2YI!

imaging demonstration"

More Videos"

•   YF-12A supersonic flight past the sun"

•   Supersonic flight, sonic booms"

•   Smoke flow visualization, wing with flap"

•   1930s test in NACA wind tunnel"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atItRcfFwgw&feature=related!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?

v=gWGLAAYdbbc&list=LP93BKTqpxbQU&index=1&feature=plcp!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=fvwp&NR=1&v=eBBZF_3DLCU/!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_WgkVQWtno&feature=related!

Next Time:

Configuration Aerodynamics – 2

Reading

Ngày đăng: 04/07/2014, 19:22

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm