The first Japanese in Canada was Manzo Na-gano, a sailor, who arrived in 1877 and after sojourns back to Japan and to the United States eventually settled in Victoria in 1892.. Neither E
Trang 194 EastAsians ofCanada
ETHNONYMS: Chinese,Japanese,Koreans, Filipinos, Nikkei
(Japanese), Orientals
Orientation
Identification Asused here, 'EastAsiansinCanada"
re-fersto Canadians ofChinese,Japanese, Korean,orFilipino
ethnicancestry.The ChineseinCanadacanbe dividedinto
two major subgroups-those who came before 1947 and
thosewho havecome sincethen The earliergroup was
com-posed almost totally ofmen who lived in western Canada
TheycameprimarilyfromGuangdongProvinceinsouthern
China Those who have arrivedsince 1947 have moreoften
beenfamilies, withasubstantialpercentage emigratingfrom
Hong Kong Within eachsubgroup furtherdistinctions can
be madeonthe basis oftimeofmigration toCanada, social
status,andplaceof birth TheJapaneseinCanadaare a
het-erogeneous group, consistingoftheissei, nisei, sansei, yonsei,
and the shineijusha Theissei, or first generation, inCanada
is made up of the early immigrants who came to Canada
roughlybetween1877and1907.Thenisei arethechildrenof
theisseiwhoas a group werebornbetween about 1908and
1940 InJapanese, nisei means'second generation," sansei,
"thirdgeneration,"andyonsei, "fourthgeneration.' The
Japa-nese immigrantswhocame toCanadaafter World War 11are
called the'shin eijusha."Theoretically, thesenew immigrants
canbecalled "issei,"but they prefertobe knownasthenew
immigrantsbecause theyare mostly technicians and
profes-sionals, unlike theisseibefore thewarwhoweremostly
labor-ers, farmers, and fishermen The Koreans and Filipinosare
morehomogeneousgroups, as many areskilled techniciansor
professionals who have settledinCanada onlyinthe lastfew
decadesand have assimilated easilyintothe Canadian
econ-omy.
Location Prior to the post-World War 11 influx, East
Asians ingeneral livedmainlyinBritishColumbiaand other
western provinces.The ChinesewereconcentratedinBritish
Columbiaaswell, thoughChinesecommunitiesdid formin
largecitieselsewhere (for example, Toronto) prior toWorld
War I. In 1986, Ontario contained the largest number of
people in each of the four groups with 156,170 Chinese,
44,195Filipinos, 17,200Koreans,and16,150Japanese
Brit-ish Columbiaishome for112,605Chinese, 15,905Japanese,
15,810Filipinos, and5,065 Koreans.Alberta alsohasmany
East Asians, and Manitoba hasa sizable (15,815) Filipino
population Therearerelativelyfew East Asiansinthe
Mari-timeProvincesor inQuebec,with theexceptionofthe
Chi-nesewho number 23,205 inthelatter
Demography Accordingto estimatesfromthe 1986
cen-sus,thereare360,320Chinese,93,285Filipinos,40,995
Jap-anese,and27,285 KoreansinCanada EastAsians constitute
about2percentof the populationofCanada.Their number
has increased rapidly in the last thirtyyears, both through
natural populationgrowth and through increased
immigra-tion under the Immigration Act of 1952 and subsequent
amendments Forthe Japanese, intermarriage ofthesansei
andyounger niseiwithnon-Japanese has contributedtothe
natural population growth Theyounger group inthe
Japa-nese-Canadian demographic profile provides a contrastingpattern to thegeneral Canadian population profile inthatthepopulation pyramidbaseiswiderindicatingthepopula-tion as a whole isyounger Filipinos in Canada today aremostly young with a high percentage of females, many ofwhom have arrived sincethe 1960s
linguistic Affiliation Prior to theend ofWorld War 11,when they were isolated from the general population, theChineseand Japanesemaintained their nativelanguages.Fullparticipation intheir community often required knowledge ofthe local or regional dialect of Japanese or Cantonese orMandarin But those who havesettled in Canada in the last
thirtyyears and theirchildren are more often bilingual in thenativelanguage andEnglish,withmanyChinese from HongKong speaking Hong Kong Chinese Many recent FilipinoandKoreanimmigrantshave arrivedalreadyspeakingEnglishalong withtheir native language
History and Cultural Relations
The history of the Chinese and Japanese in Canada is tially oneof racial discrimination from the time of arrival toafter the SecondWorld War Koreans and Filipinos, becausethey have arrived recently during the period when Canadahasembraced anofficial policy of multiculturalism, have suf-fered much less from racial discrimination There has beenlittle organized cooperation among any of the four East Asiangroups, either in the past or today
essen-Chinee Chinese first immigrated to Canadainthe 1850s
toparticipateintheFraser Rivergoldrush When the minesgave out, somemovedon toCaliforniaand others returned toChina, but the majority stayedon inBritish Columbia where
theyworkedinlow-level service jobs In the 1880s a secondwaveofChinese menarrived in Canada In all, about seven-teenthousand came, with mostrecruited to work on the ex-tension of the CanadianPacific Railroad throughBritish Co-lumbia.Whites inBritish Columbia expectedthat once therailroad was completed, the laborers would return to China.But many couldnotafford the tripback and instead settled inBritish Columbia where they worked as wagelaborersincoalmining,fish canning, and agriculture Always viewed as lessthanequalbyWhitesinBritishColumbia, theirwillingness
to workhard for low wages andthus take jobs many thoughtbelonged to Whites led to further resentment, harassment,and the formation ofanti-Chinese organizations such as theWorkingman's Protective Association and the Knights ofLabour
White resentment also led the BritishColumbia ment to seek changes in national immigration laws thatwould effectively end Chinese immigration to Canada In
govern-1885 a head tax of fifty dollars was placed on immigratingChinese; in 1901 it wasraised to one hundred dollars and in
1905 tofive hundred dollars Because the tax failed to ventimmigration, the Chinese Immigration IExclusionl Actwas amended in 1923 and immigration ceased until the actwasrepealed in 1947 Between1923and 1947 only forty-fourChinese had immigrated to Canada The repeal of the actand subsequent measures over the next twenty years gaveChinese the opportunity for full participationin Canadiansociety,including theright to vote which had previously beendenied them It also opened up immigration, with many of
Trang 2pre-EastAsians ofCanada 95
those arriving since 1947 coming as families from Hong
Kong, Taiwan, and elsewhere, such as Southeast Asia, the
Caribbean, and SouthAmerica
Japanese. The first Japanese in Canada was Manzo
Na-gano, a sailor, who arrived in 1877 and after sojourns back to
Japan and to the United States eventually settled in Victoria
in 1892 The earlyperiod of emigration from Japan
(1877-1907) was one in which conflict resulting from racial and
cul-tural differences culminated in the race riots of 1907 in
Van-couver During this period there was considerable hostility
toward both the Chinese and Japanese in British Columbia
As noted above, various measures were enacted by the British
Columbia government to restrict Chinese immigration and
participation in Canadian society Although aimed at the
Chinese, these restrictions applied to the Japanese as well
and led to disfranchisement and efforts to restrict
naturaliza-tion These various attempts to enact discriminatory and
rac-ist legislation were not occurring in a vacuum Public
agita-tion in the province had been increasing gradually
The perception of Whites in British Columbia that the
Japanesewere an economic threat rested on several basic
cul-tural differences The Japanese emphasis on frugality and
hard work was reflected in their day-to-day activities and in
their customs and habits all of which were based on the
tradi-tional Japanese value system Japanese social organization
centered on shared needs as well as on a sense of group
con-sciousness Group solidarity within the Japanese community
was further strengthened by its physical and social
segrega-tion from White society Within this bounded territorial
space, it was not difficult to retain the highly systematic and
interdependent social relations that were based on the
princi-ple of social and moral obligation and traditional Japanese
practices of mutual assistance such asoyabun-kobun
(parent-child) and sempai-kohai (senior-junior) relationships
An-other aspect of traditional Japanese social relations that
char-acterized both the oyabun-kobun and sempai-kohai systems
was the emphasis placed on one's sense ofduty, loyalty, and
obligations to one's employers Out of a sense of
unquestion-ing loyalty, the kobun or kohai blindly followed the orders
given by the oyabun or sempai Ironically, these traditional
values and customs, which led to the relatively successful
ad-aptation by the Japanese in western Canada, became the
main reason that the White community prevented the
Japa-nese from becoming equal members of Canadian society
Japanese laborers who came to Canada around 1907
were recruited toworkfor the Canadian Pacific Railway and
the Wellington Colliery The period from 1908 to 1940 was
one of controlled immigration, the major feature of which
was the "Gentlemen's Agreement" of 1908, which restricted
immigration to returning immigrants, wives and children, and
immigrants specifically hired by Canadians Because of the
Anglo-Japanese alliance and labor shortages, anti-Japanese
sentiment decreased before and during World WarI It
in-creased againduringthe depression after the war and led to
restrictions on Japanese involvement and ownershiprightsin
the fishing and other industries, professional employment,
and access to higher education As Adachi has noted, to
Japanese-Canadians citizenship was meaningless or, at best,
symbolized the 'status of second-class citizenship."
From 1941 to 1948 the situation worsened, and
Japa-nese-Canadians were deprived of their civil rights The threat
of war with Japan and then the war itself increased
anti-Japanese feelings and led the government beginning in late
1941 to impound the property ofJapanese-Canadians, closetheir language schools, and halt publication of Japanese-language newspapers In 1942, 20,881 Japanese-Canadianswere rounded up and removed todetentioncamps ininteriorBritish Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, and Ontario Restric-tions were relaxed beginning in 1943, motivated in part bythe need for Japanese workers in other parts of Canada InJuly 1947 a commission was established to compensateJapanese-Canadians for the property that had been confis-cated It was not until September 1988, however, that allproperty and civil rights claims weresettled, with thefinal set-tlement reached by the National Association ofJapanese Ca-nadians andthegovernment ofCanada.Thewartimeexperi-ence effectively destroyed the Japanese community inCanada, but revitalization has started through the efforts ofthose who have arrived in the last few decades
SettlementsEast Asians have always been and continue to be mostlyurban Early Chinese and Japanese immigrants tended toform distinct ethnic communities-"Chinatowns" and"Little Tokyos"-in large cities Because oftheir larger numbers,the Chinatowns have been morevisibleandhave drawn moreattention In the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries,these communities were typical urban immigrant ghettos.Since the 1950s, as the Chinese andJapanesepopulationsinCanada have increased and become more mobile spatiallyand socially, the urban communities have become social, po-litical, and symbolic centers aswellasresidential ones At thesame time, as discrimination has lessened, moreChinese and
Japanesehave chosen to live outside thetraditional nities Forthe Japanese, Toronto has in some ways replacedVancouver asthecenter ofJapaneseculture inCanada Kore-ans and Filipinos have also settled mainly in urban areas(two-thirds of Filipinos live in the Toronto area), but theyhave not formed distinctive residential enclaves Filipinos,perhaps more so than the other groups, have settled in thesuburbs
commu-EconomyChinese and Japanese laborerswhocame to British Colum-bia around 1907 were brought inmainlythroughcontractualarrangements between emigration companies andCanadianimporters of labor such astheCanadian Pacific Railway andthe Wellington Colliery Many ofthese menworked for therailroad, on farms, in the fishing industry, andinwood pulpmills Forthe Chinese, White Canadians expected thattheywould return to China once their work on the railroad wascompleted Whenmoststayed inCanada andtooklow-levelwork at low wages, White resentment resulted and was di-rected both at the Chinese and Japanese A laborshortageduringWorld War I dampenedanti-Asian feelings, but theyincreased againafterthe war as aresultofadepresssion andunemployment that became markedupon the return ofsol-diers
The strong control ofthe fishing industry on the westcoast bytheJapanese atthistimebecame amatterofconcernforBritish Columbia politicians, and in 1919 they attempted
to limit the number of fishing licensesissuedtoJapanese
Trang 3fish-96 East Asians ofCanada
ermen As part of the attempt to restrict immigration, the
provincial legislature asked the dominion government to
amend the British NorthAmerica Act sothatprovincial
gov-ernments would have the 'power to make laws prohibiting
Asiatics from acquiring proprietary interest in agricultural,
timber and mining landsor infishingorotherindustries,and
from employment in these industries." Between 1923 and
1925, the Department ofMarine and Fisheries took away
close to one thousandfishinglicenses from the Japanese, and
theywereprohibitedevenfrom usinggasoline-powered
fish-ingboatsinordertogiveWhite fishermenacompetitive
ad-vantage.Sucheconomicharassment continuedtoplaguethe
Japanesefishermen,andconsequently,manywent into
farm-ing
Laws that denied Chinese and Japanese the right to a
provincial vote prevented them from participating fully in
several areas of professional employment because of a
re-quirement thatone mustbeonthe voters' list.Forexample,
to securealogging license,onehadtobe twenty-one years of
age and on the voters' list These employment restrictions
alsoappliedtoeducation,andit was notuntilthe fall of 1945
that McGill UniversityinMontrealaccepteda nisei.This
de-layed access to education has had serious consequences for
the nisei in terms oftheir occupational mobility Chinese
professionals, because of these restrictions, confined their
businesstothe Chinese community After release from the
detention camps,someJapanesechoseto remain inAlberta,
Manitoba, and Saskatchewan where they became farmers
The Japanesewho have arrived since World WarIIare more
highlyeducated than both the prewar Japanese and
Canadi-ans ingeneral andarefoundinrelativelylargenumbers
work-ing inthe professions, academia, and the arts The Chinese
today are still heavily involvedinservice industries
(restau-rants, laundries, garment-making), although recent
immi-grants are less likely to enter these traditional occupations
The economic nature of the Chinatowns has been
trans-formed in the last two decades from what were essentially
res-idential enclaves thatprovidedproducts and services to the
Chinese community to major economic centers that provide
products and services to Canadian society
Many Koreans came to Canada to find economic
inde-pendence, and many have succeeded Unemployment is rare
among Korean-Canadians and about 50 percent own their
ownhome, a far greater percentage than in Korea Many are
university-educated and work as physicians, lawyers, and
pro-fessors,while perhaps some 50 percent own small businesses
such as food stores,gasoline stations, restaurants, and real
es-tate agencies In Toronto, for example, Koreans run about
twelve hundred convenience stores The success of these
en-terprises restsinpartonthewillingness of family members to
staff the establishments so thatthey can remain open for long
hours
Kinship, Marriage and Family
Chinese Chinesekinship, marriage, and family in Canada
havegone through three distinct stages From the 1880s to
1947, the Chinese in Canada formed a "bachelor
commu-nity" composed almost entirely of unmarried men or men
whosewives and families were in China These men usually
lived in collective households called fang-k'ou- in the
China-towns Afewfang-k'ou-still exist,though they are
disappear-ing asthe few remaining old Chinese bachelors die off.Theywere organized into numerous associations or fictive kingroups with affiliationbasedon a commonplaceofbirth,sur-name, ordialect The second stage tookplace roughlyfrom
1947to 1967and involved the arrival of thewives and dren of some of the bachelors and the formation of nuclearfamilies
chil-Thethird stage began in 1967 and continues today withnuclearfamilies that are similarin sizeand composition toCanadian familiesingeneral Perhapsthe majordifferencesbetween the contemporary Chinese-Canadian family andother Canadian families are theextent towhich adult Chi-nesechildren providefinancial support for their parents andthefrequency with whichgrandparents live with their chil-dren and their important contributiontochild rearing.Japanese Many of the Japanese laborers who came toCanada in theearly 1900s were unmarriedmen.Unabletore-turn toJapan,theyrelied upon arranged marriagesor on"pic-ture bride" arrangements, a systemwherebypictures of theprospective brideand groom were exchanged and the deci-sion tomarrymade after consultation with relatives andpos-
sibly the nakodo, or go-between Asthese brides immigrated
to Canada, the demographic composition of the Japanesecommunitygradually changed
Kobayashi has observed that the most significant acteristic of Japanese-Canadian marriages today is thatJapanese-Canadians aremarrying Canadians of other ethnicbackgrounds at a rate that suggests that this is the normrather than the exception Her analysis of immigrant mar-riages also reveals thatimmigrants, too, are intermarrying fre-quently with non-Japanese Canadians About 42 percent ofJapanese women underthe age offorty-fourare married to
char-non-Japanesemen
In these mixed marriages,however, there are indicationsthat not all aspectsof traditional Japanese culture have disap-peared Certairt traditional festivals such as hina-matsuri(dolls festival) on May 3, tango-no-sekku (boysfestival) onMay 5, and keiro-no-hi (a dayset aside to respect the aged) arestill celebrated The celebration of these festivals reinforcesJapanese family values For example, the elderly issei andniseiplace considerable emphasis on gaman (forebearance)andenryo(modesty).Gaman means the suppression of emo-tions,the ability to grin and bear all pain, to remain calm andcarry out one's task regardless of the circumstances Enryomeans much more thanmodesty as it encompasses codes ofbehavior concerning moderation and nonaggression Self-effacement, self-control,reticence, humility, and denigration
of oneself are all included in enryo With the aging of the isseiand nisei, the Japanese-Canadian family is attempting tocome to terms with some traditional family values such asoyakokoand kansha Oyakoko (filial piety) rests on thefeel-ing of kansha (gratitude to one's parents) and children areobliged to fulfill their filialduties to take care of their agingparents This responsibility often falls on the eldest son ordaughter But in many families, because of the vast geo-graphic distances that often separate the generations in Can-ada, it can be extremely difficult to fulfill one's filial obli-gations
Koreans and Filipinos Because of their recent arrival,middle-class socioeconomicstatus, and residential dispersal,Korean and Filipinofamiliesare generally similar to the aver-
Trang 4East Asians ofCanada 97
age Canadian family Many Koreans, however, own small
businesses, whichare often staffedby familymembers from
three generations,makingeconomiccooperationbetween
ex-tended kin important And despite economicassimilation,
many traditional Korean family values such as the
impor-tanceofties toclan members, patriarchal authority, and
re-spect for the elderly remain important Filipino families in
Canadaareoften formedthroughachain migration, with the
first immigrantbeingayoungwomanwithjob skills
marketa-ble in Canada She subsequently arranges for her parents,
children, siblings, and other relatives toemigrate
Sociopolitical Organization
Becauseof their isolation within Canadian society, both the
Chinese and Japanesedevelopeddistinct ethniccommunities
with their own social, economic, and religious institutions,
which reflected both the values and customs of thehomeland
and adaptational needs inCanada
Chinese The basic socialunit inChinesecommunities in
pre-WorldWar 11Canada, the fictive clan (clan association
orbrotherhood), reflectedthe reality that 90 percent ofthe
population was male These associations were formedin
Chi-nese communities onthe basis of sharedsurnames or
combi-nationsof names or, lessoften, common district of origin or
dialect They serveda wide range offunctions: they helped
maintain ties to China and tothe men'swives and families
there; theyprovided a forum for the settlement of disputes;
they served as centers for organizing festivals; and they
of-feredcompanionship The activities of clan associations were
supplemented by more formal, broader-based organizations
such as the Freemasons, the Chinese Benevolent
Associa-tion, and the Chinese Nationalist League With the growth
and demographic change in the Chinese community after
World War 11, the type and number of organizationsin
Chi-nese communities haveproliferated.Most are nowservedby
many of the following: community associations, political
groups, fraternal organizations, clan associations, schools,
recreational/athletic clubs, alumni associations,music/dance
societies, churches, commercial associations, youth groups,
charities, and religious groups.Inmany cases,membershipin
these groups isinterlocking; thus special interests are served
while community cohesion is reinforced In addition, there
arebroader groups that draw a more general membership,
in-cluding the Chinese Benevolent Association, the
Kuomin-tang, and the Freemasons
Japanese Groupsolidarity within the post-WorldWarII
Japanese community was strengthened by their social and
physical segregation in their work and residential
environ-ments.Within this bounded territorial space, it was not
diffi-cult to retain the highly systematized and interdependent
so-cial relations thatwerebased on theprincipleof socialand
moral obligations and the traditional practices of mutual
assistance such as theoyabun-kobunand sempai-kohai
rela-tionships The oyabun-kobun relationship promoted non-kin
social ties onthe basis ofawide-ranging setofobligations
Theoyabun-kobunrelationshipis one inwhich persons
unre-lated by kin ties enterintoan agreement to assume certain
obligations The kobun, or junior person,receivesthe
bene-fits of theoyabun's wisdom and experience indealing with
day-to-daysituations Thekobun, inturn, mustbereadyto
offer hisserviceswhenever theoyabun requires them larly, the sempai-kohai relationship is based on a senseof re-sponsibility whereby the sempai,or seniormember, assumesresponsibility for overseeing the social, economic, and reli-gious affairs of thekohai,orjunior member.Such a system ofsocial relations provided foracohesive andunified collectiv-ity,which enjoyed a high degree of competitive power in theeconomicsphere With the removal of the JapaneseduringWorld War 11, subsequent relocations, and the arrival of theshineijusha after WorldWar11, therehasbeen a weakening
Simi-of these traditional social relations andobligations.The sizable Japanese population, which shared a com-monlanguage, religion, and similar occupations, led to theformation of varioussocial organizations Friendship groupsand prefectural associationsnumbered abouteighty-four inVancouver in 1934.These organizationsprovided the cohe-siveforcenecessaryto maintainthe formaland informal so-cialnetworks operative in the Japanese community Prefec-tural association members were able to secure social andfinancial assistance, and this resource plusthe strong cohe-sive natureof the Japanesefamily enabledearly immigrants toremain competitive in numerousservice-oriented businesses.Japanese-language schools were an important means of so-cialization for the nisei, until the schools were closed by thegovernment in 1942 In 1949 the Japanesefinallywon theright tovote.Today, both the sansei andshin eijusha are ac-tiveparticipants in Canadian society,although their involve-ment inthe academic and business sectors is more noticeablethaninthepolitical sector The National Associationof Jap-aneseCanadians hasplayed a major role insettling the claims
ofthe Japanese removed during World War11andinsentingJapanese-Canadian interests in general
repre-Koreans andFilipinos Koreans andFilipinos inCanadahave formed a variety oflocal and regional associations,withthe church(United church forKoreansandRomanCatholicchurch for Filipinos) and affiliated organizations often themost important institution servingthe community
Religion and Expressive Culture
The majority of Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, and Filipinos inCanada are Christians
Chinese TraditionalChinese religiousbeliefs centered onancestorworship, which is reported asdeclininginCanada.Butbecause ancestor worship is practiced in private, justhowimportant it still is is unclear The majority ofChinesearenow Christians, with various denominations (Presbyterian,
RomanCatholic, Anglican, Lutheran, Baptist, Pentecostal)represented in the larger Chinese communities The Unitedchurch is the most important and is the center of social andrecreational activities in many communities Majorholidaysother than Christianones arethe LunarNewYear, Bright-Clear, and Mid-Autumn Chinese cultural traditions remainstrong in Canada and are reflected in Chinese opera, martialarts,food, and traditional crafts suchaspaperfolding Thesetraditions aremaintained in part throughregular culturalex-changes between Chinese-Canadian communities and thePeople's Republic of China, Taiwan, andHong Kong.Japanese The early issei or JapaneseimmigrantspreferredBuddhism, but by the early 1900s, Christian missionarieswere beginning to have some success in winning converts
Trang 598 East Asians ofCanada
Both theUnitedchurchof Canada and the Methodistswere
making considerable inroads especially with the
Canadian-bom nisei Although churches in Canada did not take a
stand whenJapanese propertywasconfiscated and the
Japa-nesewereinternedduringWorldWarII, theRoman
Catho-lic, Anglican, and United churches provided elementary
school education for children in British Columbia camps
The 1986 census indicates that this education experience
helped win converts to the churches, with 10,680 Japanese
members of the Unitedchurch, 3,425Anglicans, and 1,625
RomanCatholics in comparisonto10,330Buddhists There
arealso Japanese whoareSeventh-dayAdventists,
Pentecos-tals, Baptists, Methodists, Mormons, Lutherans, and other
Protestantdenominations.Morethan 25 percent claimno
re-ligiousaffiliation Recentimmigrants reflect thechanging
re-ligious affiliations of modem Japan in that several shinko
shukyo, or"newreligions" suchasSokaGakkai, Tenrikyo, P
L.Kyodan, RisshoKoseiKai,andKonkokyo, are beginningto
flourishinsuchcities asVancouver, Toronto,and Montreal
Thesenewreligions, however,have theirrootsinShintoism
and Buddhism
Koreans ForKoreans, earliest contacts with Canadadate
to 1890 and the arrivalof Canadian missionaries inKorea
These missionaries laterarrangedfor the immigration of
Ko-reans to Canada Koreans belong mainly to the Korean
Unitedchurch,theKoreanPresbyterianchurch, and the
Ko-reanRomanCatholicchurch,with the United church being
the mostinfluential.Atthesametime, Korean traditions are
maintained and Koreanfood, dance, music, and martial arts
arehighy visibleinCanadian society In addition to themajor
Christian holidays, Korea's National Independence Day is
celebrated on March 1
Filipino Theoverwhelming majorityof Filipinos in
Can-ada are RomanCatholics,and their churches are the centers
fororganizedactivityoutside thefamily The Christian
holi-days are major religious and social events and are celebrated
with the incorporation of traditionalfoods, dance,music,and
other customs
See also EastAsians of the United States
BibliographyAdachi, Ken (1976) The Enemy thatNever Was Toronto:
McClelland & Stewart
Chan, Anthony B (1983) Gold Mountain: The Chinese in
the New World Vancouver New StarBooks
Johnson,GrahamE (1979) "ChineseFamily and
Commu-nity in Canada: Tradition and Change." In Two Nations,
Many Cultures: EthnicGroups in Canada, edited byJeanL
Elliot, 358-371 Scarborough: Prentice-Hall of Canada
Kim, Uichol (1989) "Acculturation ofKoreanImmigrants:
What Are the Hidden Costs?" Korea Observer 20:431-454
Kobayashi, Audrey(1989) A Demographic Profile ofJapanese
Canadians Winnipeg: National Association of Japanese
Minori-Sugimoto, Howard H (1972) "The Vancouver Riots of1907: A CanadianEpisode."In EastacrossthePacific,edited
byHilary Conroy andT.ScottMiyakawa, 92-126 Honolulu:University ofHawaii Press
Sunahara, Ann (1981) The Politics of Racism Toronto:James Lorimer& Co
Ujimoto, K Victor (1979)."PostwarJapaneseImmigrants inBritish Columbia: Japanese Culture andjobTransferability."
InTwo Nations, Many Cultures: Ethnic Groups in Canada,edited by Jean L Elliot, 338-357.Scarborough: Prentice-Hall
of Canada
Wickberg,Edgar,ed (1982) From China to Canada: A tory of the Chinese Communities in Canada Toronto:McClelland & Stewart
His-K VICTOR UJIMOTO
ETHNONYMS: Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Filipinos, tals
Orien-Orientation
Identification Thegeneral category of East Asians in theUnitedStatesincludesAmericansofChinese, Filipino,Japa-nese, and Korean ancestry Neither East Asians in generalnor any of the four EastAsian-American groups is a homoge-neous cultural group in the United States Within each are anumber of identifiable subgroups, with perhaps the mostsigi-ficant being those who arrived before World War II and theirdescendants and those who have arrived since, the latter, ex-cept forJapanese-Americans, making up the overwhelmingmajority of East Asian-Americans Other important divi-sions are based on the region of origin in the sending nation,language, religion, generation, and occupation
Location Prior to the post-World WarII population crease East Asian-Americans wereconcentrated in HawaiiandCalifornia, with small numbers in Washington and Ore-gon Since World WarII, the percentage of East Asians hasincreased dramatically, partly through immigration to theUnited States and partly through migration from Hawaii tothe mainland Japanese-Americans remain heavily concen-
Trang 6in-East Asians of the United States 99
tratedintheWest (80.3 percentin1980), mainly in the Los
Angeles, San Francisco, andSanJose areas, though sizable
numbers nowlive inChicago, Washington, D.C., and New
York City In 1980, 42.9 percentofKorean-Americanslived
in the West, with the other 60 percent distributed almost
evenly inthe northeastern, north-central, and southern
re-gions In 1980, 52.7 percent of Chinese-Americans lived in
theWestwith26.8percentinthe East, with major
communi-ties in New York City and Boston Filipino-Americans
re-main a largelyWestCoast group with 68.8percent settled
there in 1980 LargeFilipino communities also exist in
De-troit,Chicago,NewYork City,and Boston as well as in San
Diego,Norfolk,NewLondon,Connecticut,and other cities
withlargenavalbases, reflectingatradition ofFilipino service
inthe U.S.Navydating to 1901
Demography Estimatesfor 1985indicate that there were
1,079,400 Chinese, 1,051,600 Filipino, 766,300 Japanese,
and 542,400 Korean-Americans inthe UnitedStates If
im-migrationfigures for 1986 through 1989 are considered, it is
likely that Filipinos are nowthelargest EastAsian groupin
the UnitedStates asthe number ofFilipinoimmigrantswas
morethan double the number of Chinese onesduring this
pe-riod The number of East Asians has increased dramatically
since the 1950s In 1940, there were 285,115 Japanese,
106,334 Chinese, 98,535 Filipino, and 8,568
Korean-Americans Reflecting this heavy recent immigration, the
East Asianpopulation contains a majority of immigrants (in
1980,63.3percentof theChinese,64.7of theFilipinos,81.9
percent of the Koreans), and they are a young population
(about60 percentareunderforty-fouryearsof ageinthese
three groups) Japanese-Americans were a larger population
thanthe other groups before 1950and have hadalowerrate
of immigration sincethen; thus they havealower percentage
of immigrants (28.4percent) andare asomewhat older
popu-lation group
LinguisticAffiliation The first generation of East Asian
immigrantsgenerally spoke the language of their homeland
Thus, Japanesespoke Japanese; Koreans spoke Korean;
Chi-nesespoke Cantonese, various Mandarin dialects, or Hakka;
and Filipinos spokeIlocano,Visayan, orTagalog, with most
recentimmigrantsspeaking Tagalog, now the offical language
of thePhilippines In the second generation of recent
immi-grants,relatively few speakthe nativelanguage regularly or
re-mainfluent in it as adults Instead, they prefer to speak
En-glish Native languagemaintenance is amajorconcernof the
first generationof recent immigrants, though language school
programshave met with only limited success
History and Cultural Relations
The natureofEast Asianimmigrationtoand settlementin
theUnitedStates is afunction ofavariety of factors
includ-ing politics and economic conditionsinthe sending nation,
therelationship between the sending nation and the United
States,the need for cheap laborintheUnited States, and the
racial prejudice encountered by East Asians in the United
States.The Chinese were thefirstEast Asiangrouptosettle
in America insignificantnumbers,with322,000 arriving
be-tween 1850 and 1882 Most weremenwho workedaslaborers
in mines, in factories,andonfarmsto earnmoney that would
enhance their economic status when they returned home
While initial settlement was in the western states, some laterwere sent eastunder a contract labor system designed toex-ploit the Chinese as a source of low-paid labor, and otherssettledinthe south Inresponse todemands for control ofChinese immigration and settlement that beganinCalifornia
in the 1860s, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Actwhichin 1882effectively ended their immigration until 1943.During this period, the Chinese population in the UnitedStatesdecreased from 107,448to61,639 It was also duringthis period, however, that Chinatowns developed in citiesnearwhere the men worked
Unlike Chinese immigrants, thefirstinflux of Filipino,Japanese, andKoreanimmigrantswent to Hawaiiwhere theywere recruited to work on the sugar and pineapple planta-tions.Later,somemovedon toCalifornia and the NorthwestCoast while others immigrated directly from their home-lands, againtowork aslaborersonfarmsandinfactories andcanneries.The Japanese camefirst, andby 1890therewere12,000inHawaiiand 3,000inCalifornia By 1920 300,000hadcome tothesetwo areas.Thegentlemen'sagreementbe-tweentheUnited States and Japanin1907placedquotasonand slowed Japanese immigration Between 1903 and 1905,7,226KoreansimmigratedtoHawaii;however,Korean immi-gration virtually disappeared for forty years when the Japa-nese government(which then ruled Korea) ended emigrationfromthe country in 1905 Filipinos were recruited and beganimmigratingto Hawaii in 1906 inplace of the Koreans andChinese Between 1909 and 1931 113,000 Filipinos immi-grated to Hawaii, with 55,000settling there, 39,000 returninghome, and 18,600 moving on to the mainland Some Filipi-nosalso immigrateddirectlytoCalifornia and the NorthwestCoast, where they were used as farmworkers in place of thedeclining numbers of Japanese and Chinese The Immigra-tionActof 1924throughquotasvirtuallyeliminatedimmi-gration from East Asia Most immigrants between 1924 andthe 1940s were wives of men already in the United States.Many of these were"picture-brides" selected through anex-changeofphotographs handled by amatchmaker NearlyallEast Asian men and women lived in distinctively Chinese,Japanese, or Filipino communities in which the native lan-guages and many traditional beliefs and practices were main-tained The marriages alsoproduced a second generation inthe United States who were citizens and whospoke Englishand were much lessinterestedinmaintainingthe traditionalcultures
DuringWorld War 11, the four East Asian communitieshad different experiences.Filipinos were classified as nation-als and therefore could not serve in the U.S armed forces,though the rules were changed during the war to allow Filipi-nos to serve The Chinese-American community benefited insome waysfrom the war, asjob opportunities opened up In
1943 the Exclusion Act was repealed, migration increased,and anti-Chinese sentiments lessened Because Korea wasruled by Japan, Korean-Americans were classified as Japa-nese, although they were strong supporters of the war and ve-hemently anti-Japanese Despite their being seen as Japanese,they were notclassifiedasenemy aliensorremovedto intern-ment camps
Thebombing of Pearl Harbor servedas acatalystto turn
years ofanti-Japanesefeeling on the West Coast into actiondesigned to destroy the Japanese-American community on
Trang 7100 East Asians ofthe United States
the mainland Japanese-Americans (including those who
werecitizens)wereclassifiedasenemyaliens and rounded up;
by the end of 1942 110,000 from California, Oregon, and
Washington had been interned in camps inthe California
desert,Idaho,Arizona,Utah,and Arkansas All exceptthose
who choseandwereallowedto serve inthemilitaryand those
whochose toresettle inthe Midwest andEast werekeptin
the camps until 1945 This mass violation of
Japa-nese-Americans' civil rights nearly destroyed the Japanese
community in the United States After release from the
campsmostreturnedtoCalifornia,with manyreestablishing
farms in the central part of thestate It was notuntil thelate
1980sthat the U.S Congressvoted topay survivors of the
camps$20,000 eachascompensation for their losses
Asnotedabove,sincethe end of WorldWarII, therehas
beenamultifoldincrease inthe numberofEast Asians
immi-grating tothe UnitedStates.Therepeal of restrictive
immi-grationlaws, closertiesbetweenthe UnitedStatesand South
Korea, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Japan, and the
Hart-Cellar ImmigrationActof 1965 whichessentiallyended the
national-origin quota systemall encouraged immigration to
and settlementintheUnited States East Asianswhohave
come toAmerica sinceWorld WarII are amuch different
population than those whocame earlier Theyare younger,
include a larger number of women and families, are often
highlyeducatedprofessionals and technicians, and expect to
stay inthe U.S
The one constant in the settlement histories of the four
groups was the economic exploitation and discrimination
they experienced In addition to major discriminatory
actions-theChineseExclusion Act, the Immigration Act of
1924,andJapanese-American internment duringWorld War
II-EastAsians were subject to numerous other
discrimina-tory practices For example, in California they werebarred
from certainbusinesses and professions, antimiscegenation
laws prevented marriage to Whites, residential restrictions
confined EastAsianstotheir own communities, various laws
limitedtheir right to own land, Chinese miners (and Mexican
miners) had their profits taxed, and so on Today, although
overtly racist policies and laws have essentially disappeared,
racism continues EastAsian-American men, for example,
make less than Whitecounterparts with equalexperience and
education, and few have madeit tothe top level of American
businesses There is also growing resentment among other
Americans about East Asianand especially Japanese
invest-ment inthe U.S.economyandownership of propertiesinthe
United States Thedepiction of East Asian-American groups
as'modelminorities" troublessome EastAsian-Americans,
as itsuggeststhatequalityhas been achieved while
contrast-ing East Asian economic success with other minorities'
al-leged failuresandthus creating conflict between the groups
Settlements
EastAsian-Americans are mainly an urban-suburban group,
with theplace of residencenowlargely determined by
socio-economic status The two major nonurban groups are
Japanese-Americans inthefarming and nursery and related
businesses in central CaliforniaandFilipino-American farm
workers in California Today, Koreatown in Los Angeles is
the center ofKoreanlifefor the 150,000 Korean-Americans
in southern California and the home for many elderly
Korean-Americansandrecentimmigrants Thelarge towns thatdeveloped early in the century incitiessuchasSanFrancisco, Portland, Boston, Los Angeles, and New YorkCity havebeentransformed into majoreconomic zonespro-vidingproducts andservicesboth to the regionalChinese-Americanpopulation and to the general economy The tour-ist trade has also become a major source of income inChinatowns Theireconomicgrowth has been accompanied
China-by orperhapswas stimulatedbytheir decline asresidentialdistricts.Aswith KoreatowninLos Angeles,mostresidentsareeitherelderlyor are recentimmigrantsand manyarepoor
"Little Tokyo" in Los Angeles, which serves American communities insouthernCalifornia, has also un-dergone the same transformation Filipino-Americans, ex-cept for the mostly male communities in Hawaii andCaliforniaearly inthe century, have not formeddistinct eth-nicenclaves comparable to Chinatowns
Japanese-Economy
Ingeneral, the economic circumstances of Koreans, Japanese,Chinese, andFilipinos in Hawaii and on the mainlandinthelate nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were much thesame.Themajoritywerelow-paid,unskilled, male workers onsugarplantations in Hawaii and in the railroad, agriculture,fishing, logging, and mining industries on the mainland.Whendemandfor their work diminished and East Asianim-migration decreased, those who remained in the UnitedStates and theirchildren tended to settle in cities and becameinvolved in service industries Filipinos worked as domestics
inhotels and as kitchen workers in restaurants and many menjoined the Merchant Marine or the U.S Navy where theyworked as messstewards or in other low-level service jobs Atthe same time, many Filipinos were employed seasonally asfarmworkers andeventually became active in the unioniza-tionmovement TheChinese were also employed in serviceindustries as well asfounding their own businesses, with res-taurants, laundries, and garment factories being most com-mon In Hawaii, many Chinese sugar workers went on towork in the rice industry, and a sizable percentage becamebusiness owners or professionals The Japanese also foundwork asdomestics,gardeners, and farmers, with some findingways tocircumventlaws that prohibited them from owningland Many of those who owned farms returned to rebuildthemafter they were released from the World War II intern-mentcamps.Both the Japanese and Chinese businesses havebeen described as'middlemanminority" adaptations charac-terized by self-ownership of family-staffed businesses thatprovide a uniqueproductorservice tothe community.The arrival of the post-World War II immigrants haschangedthe position of East Asian-Americans in the U.S.economy Many ofthose who have arrived since 1965 havebeenhighlyeducated professionals or skilled technicians, andthe children of theearliersettlers have had greater access toadvanced education and professional employment Thesetwodevelopments have improved the economic position ofEastAsian-Americans Both men and women are now em-ployedat about the same rates as Americans in general Thepercentages of East Asian-American women who work (55percentofKoreans,58percent ofChinese, 59 percent ofJap-anese, and 68 percent ofFilipinos in 1980) are especiallynoteworthy As of 1980, the men were employed insignifi-
Trang 8East Asians of the United States 101
cant numbers inmanagerialandprofessional positions(22.5
percent for Filipinos to 38 percent for Chinese), with the
largestpercentagesofwomenbeingemployedin
administra-tivesupportandservicejobs.Unique occupation patterns
in-clude22 percent of Chinese-American men inservicejobs,
30.4percentofFilipino-Americanmen in serviceand
admin-istrative support positions, and 14.4 percent of
Korean-American men insales.Forwomen, 18.2percent of
Chinese-Americanand 24 percentof Korean-American womenwork
in low-level laborer positions Gross figures indicate that
full-time Chinese-American and Japanese-American men
havehigher incomes and Filipino-American and
Korean-American men have lower incomes than Whites The
Chi-neseand Japanese figuresaresomewhatmisleading, however,
inthattheydonotreflect the fact thatmen inthese groups
often have more education and worklongerhours than do
Whites Korean-Americans have drawn considerable
atten-tion asownersofsmallbusinesses,oftengrocerystores or
veg-etablestands, inminorityneighborhoods, suggesting a
mid-dleman minority role similar to the Chinese and Japanese
earlier
Kinship, Marriage and Family
Kinship Inthe early Korean,Chinese, and Filipino
com-munities,which werecomposed almost entirely of men, ties
tofamilies and wider kin networksweremaintainedthrough
return visits, correspondence, and the remittance of a
per-centage of the man's earnings In the communities that
formedinthis country, the absence of East Asianwomenand
antimiscegenationlawsmade marriage and the formation of
families and kin groups difficult Some community cohesion
wascreatedthroughfictive kin groups modeled on clan and
extended family structures in the homeland Chinese men
formed fictiveclanswith recruitment andmembership based
onimmigrationfrom the same village or province or
posses-sion of the same surname When Chinese families began to
form later inthe earlytwentieth century with the arrival of
Chinese women, these clan associations became less
impor-tant Filipinos organized compang, fictive extended families
composed ofmen who immigrated from the samevillage,
with the oldestmanusuallyheading thefamily As more
Fili-pino women immigrated to the United States,
Filipino-American families became more common (though before
World War II Filipino-American men still outnumbered
womenby nearly three to one), and the compadrazgo
(godpar-ent) system was transferred to the United States with each
in-dividual then enmeshedin anetwork of actual and fictive kin
The situation forJapanese-Americans was different, as
beginningin 1910stablefamiliesbegan to form and Japanese
urban and ruralcommunities also become relativelystable
Although the second-generation Japanese-Americans, the
nisei, were being acculturated into American society, the
first-generation-based family (issei) was still strong enough to
maintain traditional beliefs regarding appropriate behavior
between superiorsand inferiors aswell asfilialduties
Marriage and Family Themost noteworthy trend in East
Asian-Americanmarriagesis the shift from ethnic
endoga-mous toethnic exogamous marriage In all groups since the
1950sthere has beenalarge increaseinthe number of
mar-riages to non-ethnic group members, and especially to
Whites Contemporary East Asian-American families are
generally small nuclear families Korean-Americanandpino-American households are somewhat largerbecause ofthelargernumber of childreninthe former and the presence
Fili-ofnon-nuclear family members in the latter East Americanfamilies are notably stable, with over 84 percent ofchildren in all four groups living with both of their parents.Nonetheless, there are concerns in the Chinese-Americancommunity about juvenile delinquency and in the Korean-Americanabout what is consideredahigh divorce rate.There
Asian-is a major difference in household composition betweenthose already settled in the United States andrecentimmi-grants Households among thelatter frequently contain addi-tional relatives beyond the nuclearfamily orfriends,asthesehouseholds are often part of the chain migration processthroughwhich relatives immigrate totheUnited States.Within households in all four East Asian-Americangroups,decisionmaking has become more egalitarian as pa-triarchal authority has diminished Women, however, stillbear the major responsibility for household tasks, eventhough a majority of both men and women are employed.Educational opportunities are afforded both boys and girls,andboth sexes are encouraged toexcel inschool
Socialization Aswith Americans ingeneral,socializationtakesplacethrough the family, the local community, and theformal education system Many East Asians inthe past came
to Americawithahighschool education and many of the re.centimmigrantshave college and/or professional education
or technical training The children of recent immigrantsmake full use of educational opportunities in the UnitedStates; infacteducation for their children is a major reasonmany East Asians resettle Programs designed to maintainthe traditional culture, such as language classes, youthgroups, and cultural programs are offered in all major EastAsiancommunitiesbyethnic associations and churches Onemajor problem facing many recent immigrant families is agenerationalgapbetween parents who prefer to speak the na-tivelanguage andeat nativefoods, stressfamilyobligations,and associate mainly with other ethnic group members andtheir children who see themselves as Americans, speak En-glish, and make friends amongnon-Asian-Americans
Sociopolitical OrganizationSocial Organization Each of the fourEastAsian-Amer-icangroupsis adiverse ethnic group composed of a number
of distinctsubgroups Acrossall four groups, two internal visions are most obvious First is the distinction betweenthose who settledbefore World War II and their descendantsand those who arrived after the war Second is the distinction
di-in thepost-World War IIgroup between the parental andsecond generation, with the latter composed of those whowere born in the United States or came when they wereyoung Beyond these two categories, each East Asian groupdisplaysadditional diversity as well as various social institu-tionsdeveloped in the United States
Chinese Major divisions within the Chinese-Americancommunity include those based on place of origin (HongKong, Taiwan, Southeast Asia), Cantonese or non-Cantonese ethnicity, rural or urban residence, and supportforTaiwan or recognition of the People's Republic of China.Localized in Chinatowns and excluded from full participa-tion in American society for over one hundred years,
Trang 9102 EastAsians of the United States
Chinese-Americansdeveloped acomplexsetofinterlocking
organizations that enabled them to maintain elements of
their traditional culture while adapting totheirnew life In
the earlyyears, when thepopulationwas mostly male,clan
andregional associationswith affiliation based on surname
and region of origin served to affiliate men inthe United
Statesand maintaintieswiththehomeland Other
organiza-tionsincludingsecret societies (tongs), guilds,andcredit
as-sociations werealsodeveloped,all ofwhich served economic,
political, and social functions With the arrival of more
womenand the formation offamilies inthetwentieth
cen-tury,thesecond generationof Chinese-Americans appeared
Althoughtheyweresociallyandeconomicallyisolated from
mainstream society, they learned English in school and
formed organizationsbasedon mainstreammodels and
inter-ests Atthe same, theywerelessinterested in the traditional
culture, and membershipin the clan and regional
associa-tionsdeclined In the post-World War11immigrant group,
the clan and regionalassociationsand tongs have declinedin
importanceasthe focus has shiftedtoformingorganizations
that willhelpChinese-Americans securefullrightsas
Ameri-can citizens
Filipinos.ForFilipino-Americans,the major internal
dis-tinction isbased on the region from which one emigrated: the
Ilocanos from northern Luzon, the Tagalogs from central
Luzon, and the Visayans from the central Philippines
Al-though the three groups are no longer as separate as they
once were, regional endogamy isstill stressed by the
post-World WarIIparental generation,and a preference for
affilia-tionwithpeoplefrom the same region has contributed to the
absence of apan-Filipinoorganization in theUnited States
Inthe mostly male pre-World War 11 Filipino community,
few social organizations developed Instead, social cohesion
was achieved through the maintenance of family and kin
groups based on traditional practices Today, the Roman
Catholic churchisthe social center of many Filipino
commu-nities, andkinshipandfriendshipnetworks are also
impor-tantagents ofsocial cohesion
Japanese Within the Japanese-American community a
majordistinction is madeonthebasis of generation in the
United States with the issei being the first generation, the
nisei the second, the sansei the third, and the yonsei the
fourth.These categoriesareappliedtothose who arrived
be-fore World War 11 Those who arrived afterthewarare
techni-cally issei, but are not referred to as such Japanese in the
United States alsoincludeJapanesebusinessmenand wives
or ex-wivesofAmericanswhoworkedinJapan after World
War II Both these groups exist outside the
Japanese-American community In the prewar years in California,
Japanese-Americans formed a network ofinterlocking
busi-nesses,such as rooming houses, laundries, groceries, and so
on, which served the Japanese-American and other East
Asian-American communities At the same time, the issei
maintained acohesive community through educational and
culturalorganizations, acredit association, and regional
asso-ciations The nisei moved away from the more traditional
groups and chose instead to form their own organizations
often based on existing mainstream models and activities
such as recreation leagues Today, the Japanese-American
community issociallycomplex withdistinctions made on the
basis of generation, age, political affiliation, life-style, and
oc-cupation At the same time, Japanese values emphasizinggroupinterests over individual interests, deference, loyalty,and reciprocity governeverydaybehavior for many Japanese-Americans andare amajorsourceofsocial cohesion.Koreans The Korean-American community today iscomposed mainly ofpeoplewho immigrated tothe UnitedStatesafter WorldWar II and their children One basic dis-tinction in the community is made among those born inKorea (Ilse), those borninthe UnitedStates(Eseorsamee,and those whocame to the United States when theywereyoung The Ilse tend tospeak Korean rather thanEnglish,have strong ties to Korea, and emphasize the role and author-ity of the family and the husband/father Those in theyounger generationare moreassimilatedinto Americansoci-ety Unlikethe otherEast Asiangroups, organizations based
on kinship or regional affiliations rarely formed amongKorean-Americans Rather, most organizations have formed
on the basis of common interests and include clubs,churches, associations,andpoliticalgroups One of themoreimportantarethe alumni associations (high school and col-lege) which enmesh Korean-Americans inlifelong social andeconomic networks Living outside the Korean-Americancommunityareperhaps as many as 100,000 wives or ex-wives
ofAmerican servicemenwhoservedinKorea,theirchildren,and thousands of Koreanchildrenadopted into White fami-lies
PoliticalOrganizaion. Becausethey were denied ship and the right to vote, East Asian-Americans beforeWorld War11wereessentially powerless to directly influencelocal, state, or federal policies and actions that affected them.Within the mostly male, relatively isolated East Asian-Americancommunities, social control and decision makingwasbased on traditional beliefs and customsthat usually ac-corded much authority tothe older men in the community
citizen-Atthesametime,theregional and clan associations, guilds,secretsocieties,and other organizations served as special in-terest groups toadvance the interests of their members EastAsian-American interests within American society wereoften handled by umbrella organizations, which included theChinese Consolidated Benevolent Association and later theChinese-American Citizens Alliance, the Japanese-Amer-
icanCitizen's League, and the Korean Association A Filipino political organization did not develop, though Filipi-nos wereactiveinlabor movements in Hawaii and California.Politics in the homeland have and continue to be a majorconcern anda sourceofconflictespecially in the Chinese-American and Korean-American communities SomeKorean-Americansaffiliate on the basis of ties to factions inKorea, and a major division in theChinese-American com-munity involves those who emphasize ties to Taiwan versusthose whorecognize and want ties strengthened with the Peo-ple's Republic of China
pan-Japanese-Americans have beenactiveinHawaiiantics andhold many elective offices, a development that hassometimesledtoconflict with otherethnic groups On themainland,especially since the 1960s and to some extent as aresult of the civil rights movement, Chinese and Japanese-Americans especially have been more active in voicing theirconcerns, participating inthe major political partypolitics,running foroffice, and seekinggovernmentemployment
Trang 10poli-East Asians of the UnitedStates 103
Religion and Expressive Culture
Religious Beliefs Religiousbeliefs and institutionshave
beenamajorforce in all East Asian-Americancommunities,
both past and present,thoughtheparticularbeliefs and
insti-tutionsvary among the four groups.Most Koreanswho
set-tled in the United States had already been converted to
Christianity (usuallyProtestantism) inKoreabefore arriving
In the contemporary Korean-American community thethe
KoreanChristian churches areoften thecenterof
commu-nityactivity andprovide many programs ofspecial appeal to
women, the elderly, and children They have also been the
locus of language and cultural maintenance programs In
manychurches the services areconducted in Korean
Nearly all Filipinos in the United States are Roman
Catholics, their ancestors having been converted some
gen-erationsagointhePhilippines.Becauseof theirdispersed
res-idence pattern, Filipino-Americans do not form their own
churches but instead affiliate with the local church
The first generation of Japanese-Americansbelieved in
Buddhism and/or Shintoism Many were converted in the
United Statesbymissionaries to various Protestant
denomi-nations, and today the Japanese-American community has
perhaps the widest range ofreligious affiliations of the four
East Asian-American groups Recent immigrants have
brought with them some of the newJapanese religions,
al-though all have rootsinBuddhism and Shintoism
Thereligious beliefs and practices of the early Chinese
immigrants centered on ancestor worship, Buddhism, and
Taoism Ancestor worship was especially important as a
source of communitycohesion and as a mechanism to
main-tain tieswiththe homeland Efforts byProtestant
missionar-ieswith these immigrantslargely failed,andtoday only about
20percentof Chinese-AmericansareChristians.Recent
im-migrantshavebrought with themsomeof the revived
Chi-nese folk religions and have formed Buddhist and Taoist
associations
ExpressiveCulture Thepost-World War11immigration
hasrevitalizedthe expressive elements of East Asian culture
in the United States In all four groups, traditional dance,
music,theater,and artareflourishing and are a majorfocus
of ethnicsolidarity andpride,as arethepubliccelebration of
traditionalholidays.Some aspects of expressiveculture have
also become part of the mainstream culture, most notably
Chinese and Japanese cuisines, martial arts,architecture,and
artistic styles anddesigns
See also East Asiansof Canada
BibliographyAlmirol,Edwin B (1983).EthnicIdentity and Social Negotia-
tion: AStudy ofa Filipino Community in California NewYork:
AMS Press
Bonacich, Edna, and John Modell (1980) The Economic
BasisofEthnicSolidarity:SmallBusinessintheJapanese
Ameri-canCommunity Berkeley: University of California Press
Hurh,WonMoo,andKwangChung Kim (1984) Korean migrants inAmerica: AStructural Analysis of EthnicConfine-ment and Adhesive Adaptation Rutherford, N.J.: FairleighDickinson University Press
Im-Kendis,Kaoru 0.(1988).AMatterof Comfort: Ethnictenance and Ethnic Style among Third-Generation Japanese-Americans NewYork AMS Press
Main-Kim,Ilsoo.(1981).New UrbanImmigrants: The Koreanmunity inNew York Princeton, N.J.: Princeton UniversityPress
Com-Kitano,H L (1977) JapaneseAmericans:The Evolution ofaSubculture Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall
Loewen,JamesW (1971) The Mississippi Chinese: BetweenBlack and White Cambridge: HarvardUniversity Press.Pido, A.J.A (1985) The PilipinosinAmerica: Macro-MicroDimensions of Immigration and Integration Staten Island,N.Y.: Centerfor MigrationStudies
Sung, Betty Lee (1967) Mountain of Gold New York:Macmillan
Takali, Ronald (1989) Strangers from a Different Shore: AHistory of AsianAmericans Boston: Little, Brown& Co.Thernstrom, Stephan(1980) Harvard Encyclopedia ofAmer-ican Ethnic Groups Cambridge: Harvard University Press,Belknap Press
Tsai, F W.(1980).-Diversityand Conflictbetween Old andNew Chinese Immigrants in the UnitedStates." In Source-bookontheNew Immigration:Implication forthe UnitedStatesand the International Community, edited by Roy S Bryce-Laporte, 329-337.Washington, D.C.: Research Institute onImmigration and Ethnic Studies, Smithsonian Institution.Wong, Bernard (1983) Patronage, Brokerage, Entrepreneur-ship, and the Chinese Community ofNew York NewYork:AMS Press
Xenos, Peter S., Robert W Gardner, Herbert R Barringer,andMichaelJ.Levin(1987) "Asian Americans: Growth andChange inthe 1970s." In Pacific Bridges: The New Immigra-tion from Asia and the Pacific Islands, edited by James T.Fawcett and Benjamin V Carifio, 249-284 Staten Island,N.Y.: Center for MigrationStudies
Yanagisako, S (1985) Transforming the Past: Tradition andKinship among Japanese Americans Stanford: Stanford Uni-versityPress
Yu, Eui-Young (1989) "Korean American Community in1989: Issues and Prospects." Korea Observer 20:275-302
Daniels, Roger (1988) AsianAmerica: Chinese andJapanese
in the United States since 1850 Seattle: Universityof
Wash-ington Press
Trang 11104 Eastern Shoshone
ETHNONYMS: Green River Snakes, Plains Shoshone,
Wa-shakie's Band,Wind River Shoshone
Orientation
Identification The Eastern Shoshone have livedin
west-ernWyoming,particularlyinthevalleysof theWind, Green,
andBigHornrivers, sinceabout the fifteenthcentury,
com-biningthegeneralculturetypeof the Great Basin with those
of the pre-horse and post-horse Great Plains In addition,
theyhave been influencedby Spanish, American,and other
sources. Intheearly 1980s, therewere perhaps three
thou-sand of their descendantslivingonthe Wind River
Reserva-tion inWyomingandits environs.
Location TheEastern Shoshonecanbe dividedinto two
groups, the Buffalo Eaters (Sage Brush People) and the
Mountain Sheep Eaters (Mountaineers) The former
occu-piedthe Green River and Wind Rivervalleysand hada
pat-ternof annualmovement withconcurrenttribal
concentra-tionanddispersal Inearliertimestheywereunder continual
attack from the Plainstribes, includingtheArapaho,
Black-foot,and Sioux TheMountainSheepEaters used the central
Rocky Mountain region, including the Yellowstone Lake
area.The Wind RiverReservation,whichtheynowshare with
the NorthernArapaho,wasestablishedin1863 Itis a
gener-ally drymountainous areawith rainfallaveragingabout
thir-teen inches a year, and with average temperatures ranging
from 10° to80° F
Linguistic Affiliation The Shoshonespokedialects of the
Central Numiclanguage, a branchof the Uto-Aztecan
lan-guage family, and had affinities to the languages of the
Northern andWesternShoshone groups.
History and Cultural Relations
Theirhistorysinceabout 1500canbe describedin anumber
of phases,beginning with their pre-horse penetrationof the
High Plains andtheiradoptionoflarge-scalebisonhunting;
then with theacquisitionof horses around 1700came a
sec-ond phase ofwidespread raiding through the plains.Athird
phase, around the beginning ofthe nineteenthcentury, was
marked byalosingwarwiththeBlackfoot, smallpox
epidem-ics,and the introductionof the Sun Dance Thiswasfollowed
byaperiod of alliances with the Whites and renewedtribal
vi-ability under Chief Washakie Reservation life in the later
nineteenthcentury wascharacterizedbyintensehardship and
population losses The first half of the twentieth century
showed cultural and demographic stabilization, and
innova-tion inreligiousinstitutions.Since 1945,there hasbeen
pop-ulation growth and a general adaptation to mainstream
White cultureaswellas to a growingArapaho political
domi-nance on thereservation.
Settlements
Inthe nineteenthcentury,theEasternShoshone hada
com-plexpatternof land use.The Buffalo Eatersdidnot havea
single setof specifiedboundaries, butanumber ofdifferent
ones ofvarying significance Thevalleys of the Green and
Windrivers weretheircorearea, withthe plains and tainsused at times.They hadapatternof annual movementswith concurrent tribal concentrations and dispersals TheMountainSheep Eatersheld the central Rocky Mountain re-gion but also hadreciprocal relations with the Buffalo Eaters
moun-In the early days, the dwellings were bison-skin tipis Thetipis' pole frameworkwascoveredbyacomplex arrangementofbisonhides, and the coveringwasdecorated withpaintingscelebrating the husband'saccomplishments.Small menstrualhuts were also used Dwellings on the reservation today aregenerally woodenbungalows
EconomySubsistence and Commercial Activities There was alarge variety offauna available to the Eastern Shoshone, sup-plemented byberries and roots, with seeds being of minorim-portance Access totheseresources waslimited somewhatbynaturalconditions, andbytheactionsof hostile tribes.Hunt-ershad aright to theirkill,withaspecial sequence ofsharingfollowed for bison Sites for fish weirsorgame trapsinvolvedonly temporary property rights, and plant gathering involvednone Food was ritualized toonly a minor extent, the mostimportantbeing ataboo on meat eating by women in men-strual or birthingseclusion Staples were the bison,fish (espe-cially trout), elk, beaver, and mule deer Major but only occa-sionally available game included the antelope, jackrabbit,mountainsheep, marmot, and sage hen These were supple-mentedby many minor food sources Lynx, mink, otter, andweasel were not eatenbut were valued for their furs Women,especially in thelate summer and fall, picked currants, rosehips, haws, andgooseberries They dug up roots, camas bulbs,and wild onions Greens and the sugar content of varioushoney plants enlivened the diet Thistles and some kinds ofsunflowers served as the only source of seeds The seasonality
of foodstuffs ruledthe annual congregating, movement, anddispersal of the various Shoshone groups The bison wasbyfar the greatestresourcebut was availableonly brieflyinthespring and for a longer period in the fall The women wereskilled and rapid butchers and were efficient at drying themeat But the Shoshone could only rarely gain as much ashalf their annual food supply from bison The principal foodfish were cutthroat trout, Montana grayling, and RockyMountainwhitefish, taken primarily in the springand eithereatenfresh or preservedby sun-drying or smoking The basicmethod of catchingfishwasby driving them into a weir Afterbison andfishinimportance were elk, which were rundownlike bison, or single elkbeing tracked like mule deer Berrieswere eaten fresh, in soups, or pounded with meat andfat to bepreserved aspemmican Roots were cooked in an earth oven.Prickly pear in drier areas was eaten on rareoccasions.The horse, mule, and dog were the domestic animals,withcattle being added in the later nineteenthcentury Theyprized horses anddogsasaids intransportation,hunting, and
war,neitheranimal was eaten except in great need, nor werethe hides and bones put to other uses Both animals were wellcared for, with thebison-hunting horse often being sacrificed
on a man's grave.Men cared for war horses, women for packhorses and baggage They used rawhide-lashed wood-handledwhips but notspurs, transported the infirm with a horsetra-vois, and raidedother tribes for horses They had arelativelylow incorporationof the horse into religion and the formal
Trang 12Eastern Shoshone 105
socialstructure.TheBuffaloEaterskeptdogsforhuntingand
asguards, and theMountainSheepEatersuseddogtransport
on a large scale
Industrial Arts The EasternShoshone made a wide
vari-etyof leathergoods Tipis, clothing, and containers,aswellas
hidesorfursprimarilyfortrade,werethe major manufactures
The latter were of three types: sumptuary, ritual, and craft
products; utilitarian objects (coiled basketry, drinking homs,
bear-pawsnowshoes); and improvised expedient productions
(temporary housing, bullboats, scrapers) In later years they
were heavily involved in the fur trade and in intermarriage
with traders and White settlers
Division of Labor Bison-skin tipis were made by the
womenand decoratedby their husbands.Leatherworking,
ex-ceptforshields, bowstrings, drums, and rattles, was women's
work Women possessed special skills in plant gathering,
householdcrafts, curing, household transportation, and
gam-bling They were socially subordinate to the men who were
engaged in hunting, fishing, warfare, working with horses,
and trade
Kinship
The Eastern Shoshone used Hawaiian kinship terminology,
allcousinsbeingequatedwithsiblingsorcalledbyterms
de-rivative from those used for siblings In the terminology,
which is stillbeing used, there are distinctions between
pri-maryand descriptive terms Collective and quasi-kin terms
indicate focal andindefinitely extended relationships Most
primary termsrefer to consanguineal kin They distinguish
thekinsman's line of descent and generation, and, in part,
the sex of the speaker Both parallel and cross cousins are
considered to be more distant siblings
Marriage and Family
Marriage In the past, bride-service was common,
espe-cially through a young groom's living initially with his wife's
parents.There used to be a high degree of polygyny, and
sib-ling exchange marriages were also probably common
Ac-cording toShimkin,however,inthe period 1850-1930, only
3 casesof polygyny, 2 of sibling exchanges, and 3 of marriage
with consanguinealkinwerereported outof239marriages
These changes were likely due to Christian influence
Mar-riagewasforbidden with any firstorsecondcousin
Premari-tal sex relations were freely permitted and subjectto no
sanc-tions
Inheritance There was an absence of individual property
rights in land or movable property, or of any rule of
inheri-tancegoverning the transmissionofsuch rights
Socialization Infants and very young boys and girls were
dependents undifferentiated by sex They were rarely
pun-ished, but kept quiet through fears of monsters and enemies
Larger boys joined peer groups, with aggression being much
encouraged Adolescence for boyswas notformally marked,
and the search for supernatural powerbegan at this time
Marriage and joining a military society connoted a man's
sta-tus.Agirl would stay with her mother, helpinginhousehold
chores, caring for younger siblings, and playing girls' games
Menarche required isolation in the family menstrual hut,
avoidance of meat and of daytime sleeping, and the
obliga-tion togatherfirewood Shortlyafter menarche, agirl'sentsor, ifthey were dead, her older brother or maternal uncle,would arrange her marriage-usually to a good hunter, stableand reliable
par-Sociopolitical Organization
Social Organization Ageand sexlargely determined rolesand status within the traditional society, with inheritanceplaying a small role Social positions, however, were earned inwarfare or attributed to the acquisitionof supernatural power.Women weresocially subordinated to men and menstruationstigmatized women as sourcesofdangerous ritual pollution.Polygyny (never sororal) involved conflicts and the economicexploitation of younger wives In middle and older ages, mid-wifery, curing, or gambling earned prestige for women Inmodem times, largebilateral kindreds have become key socio-political elements Berdaches, of low status, were alsopresent
Political Organization The whole tribe was gathered attimesfor winter shelter In winter andearly spring, the tribecouldbreak up into three tofive bands, each having a looseassociationwith a particular region in western Wyoming, butnotnamed or bounded.Membership in each band was flex-ible, with extended family groups joining one or another ofthe bands or sometimes another tribeentirely Effective lead-ership was necessary in the bison hunt, warfare, trade, andwintershelter In the tribe, and to a varying extent in eachband, the conduct of chieftainship was aided by two militarysocietiesand by a variety of temporary fides, such as heralds.The chief was a middle-aged or older man of military andshamanic distinction who gave orders affecting the tribalmarch or a collective hunt He also gave counsel on issues ofjoint decision, but had little to do with internal disputes.There was evidence of an active tribal council in earlier times,but on the reservation now, they maintain a business council
of six members The business of the reservation as a whole iscarried out by a joint business council with the NorthernArapaho tribe, also residents of the reservation The two mili-tary societies, the Yellow Brows and the Logs, werecomple-mentary rather than competitive
Social Control and Conflict War was a continuing stateamongthem,and war gains and losses directly affected tribalviability In the early nineteenth century, the Shoshone werebadly battered by smallpox and were threatened by Sioux,Cheyenne, and Gros Ventre raiders Theycountered thesethreats by alliances with fur traders and the U.S government,but theycontinuedto lose small parties to raiders until wellinto the late nineteenth century The demographic effects ofwarfare were severe Eventually, there was a low adult male/femalesexratio,as aresultof which they were forcedto re-cruit trappers, Metis,and Indians from other tribes into mar-riages Features evident in Shoshone warfare were warhonors, which were the greatest source of prestige,suicideincombat, and horse-stealing raids on foot Chiefs were incharge oflargeactions andpeacemaking
Religion and Expressive Culture
ReligiousBeliefs Prior to extensive Christian missionaryeffortsand the introduction of the Peyote religioninthe latenineteenth century, the Eastern Shoshone practiced two
Trang 13106 Eastern Shoshone
forms of religious beliefs and behavior The firstwasdirected
towardpersonalsuccessand survivalthroughthe acquisition
ofsupernatural power from the world of spirits The second
wasdesigned forthe welfare of the community and of nature
andtoward offimpending prophesizeddisasters The
mytho-logical beings andanimationsof nature and their powerswere
of central importance, with the relation between shaman and
powerbeing of supplication and dependency A successful
questfor powerwasexpressed byavision inwhich the power
appearsbestowing skillsorprotections, fetishestocallforth
the power, a song, and individualtaboos Water Ghost
Be-ings and Rock Ghost Beings were feared The domain of
ghosts included not only Ghost Beings, but old women,
great-grandparents, apparitions, and whirlwinds
Ceremonies The Father Dance, the Shuffling Dance
(Ghost Dance), and the Sun Dancewere supplications
ad-dressedtobeneficentbeings,particularlyOurFather.The
Fa-therDanceand theShuffling Dancewereespeciallya
tradi-tion among the Mountain Sheep Eaters and were usually
nighttime eventsinthefall,winter, or spring inwhich both
menand women participatedinthe singing ofsacred songs
The Sun Dance,probablyacquired from the Plains tribes, was
aday-and-nightevent of the summer,restricted to men, with
dancing andthirstingtoexhaustion
Medicine It wasbelieved that illness came frombreach of
taboos, malevolent dwarfpeople, and sorcery Ontheother
hand, they were pragmatic about childbirth, snake bites,
minor ailments, and wounds and fractures Houses where
death had occurredwereoftenabandoned
BibliographyJohnson, ThomasHoevet(1975).TheEnosFamily and Wind
River Shoshone Society: A Historical Analysis Ann Arbor
UniversityMicrofilms
Lowie, Robert Harry(1915) Dances and Societies of the Plains
Shoshone.AmericanMuseumofNatural History,
Anthropo-logicalPapers, 11, 803-835 NewYork
Shimkin,DemitriB (1947).WindRiverShoshone
Ethnogeog-raphy University of California Anthropological Records,
5(4) Berkeley
Shimkin, Demitri B (1947) Childhood and Development
among the Wind River Shoshone Universityof California
An-thropological Records, 5(5) Berkeley
Shimkin, Demitri B (1986)."Eastern Shoshone." In
Hand-book of North American Indians Vol 11,GreatBasin,edited
by Warren L d'Azevedo, 308-335 Washington, D.C.:
Smithsonian Institution
Trenholm, Virginia C., and Maurine Carley (1964) The
Sho-shonis: Sentinelsof the Rockies Norman:Universityof
Okla-homa Press
ETHNONYM:TunumiutThe East Greenland Inuit are found in the Ammassalik(65°40' N) and Scoresbysund (70° N) regions on the eastcoast ofGreenland Two other east Greenland groups, theNortheast and the Southeast Greenland Inuit, are now ex-tinct In 1980the East Greenlanders numbered some threethousand with about twenty-four hundred in the Ammassalikregion and four hundred in Scoresbysund The EastGreenlandic languageis adialect of Central Greenlandicand
ismutually intelligible with theWestGreenlandic dialect.East Greenland was settled by peoples migrating eastfrom WestGreenland, beginning as early as the fourteenthcenturyand continuing tomodem times As Europeans pre-ferred to settleinthe west, the EastGreenlanders come undersustained European influenceonly after 1900 Early contactswerein the form of schools andchurchs, followed by storesand colonial rule by Denmark Scoresbyund was settled in
1925by migrants from Ammassalik Since about 1950, theEast Greenlanders have experienced considerable culturalchange-most significantly, ashift from asubsistence hunt-ing economy to a money economybased on the sale of seal-skins and cod fishing
Prior to Danish rule, there were no permanent ments,with new winter settlements established every year or
settle-soandmorefrequent movements inthe warmer months Theextended family longhouse with nuclear families occupying
'apartments" wasthe typical dwelling in the winter village.Tents were used in the summer Traditional housing has nowbeenreplaced by expensive wood houses that have led to amoresettled life, but that have also put new financial burdens
on EastGreenlanders
The traditionalsubsistence economy was based heavily
on seal meat and skin as well as whale, sea birds, and fish.Productive equipment included dog sleds, umiaks, kayaks,wooden boats, harpoons, knives, sealskin floats, and sealnets The motor boat hasreplaced traditional modes of trans-portation, though thekayak remains important forsealing.Sale of sealskins and cod along with craft sales, wage labor,and welfare are sources of income today
Thebasic social unit is the patrilocally extended familyusually consisting of three generations residingin onedwell-ing The oldestmale heads the family, though leadership inmost activities vests in those who are mostskilled or knowl-edgeable A few households formed a settlement, althoughties between the family units were loose and families couldjoinorleaveasettlement asthey chose The Ammassalik andScoresbysund regions are governed by municipal councils andrepresentedon the GreenlandMunicipal Council
Missionary activity inEastGreenlandwasvery
success-ful,andmost EastGreenlanders are now Christians The ditionalreligionincluded beliefsin atripart universe, asoul(tarneq), and various gods and spirits Shamanism was nothighly developed, as individuals could use magictoapproachthesupernatural world directly
Trang 14BibliographyPetersen, Robert (1984) "East Greenland before 1950." In
Handbook ofNorthAmericanIndians.Vol.5, Arctic, editedby
David Damas, 622-639.Washington,D.C.:Smithsonian
In-stitution
Petersen, Robert (1984) "East Greenland after 1950." In
Handbook of NorthAmerican Indians.Vol.5, Arctic, editedby
David Damas, 718-723 Washington,D.C.:Smithsonian
In-stitution
Trap, Jens P (1970) Gronland. 5th ed Edited by Niels
Nielsen, Peter Skautrup, and Christian Vibe Danmark, Vol
14 Copenhagen, Denmark: G.E.C GadsForlag
Eskimo
ETHNONYMS:Esquimox, Esquimaux
Thename "Eskimo"hasbeenappliedtothenative
peo-plesof the Arcticsincethesixteenthcentury;ironically, it is
not anEskimo word.Forcloseto a centuryboth
anthropolog-ical and popular sources, includingthe Oxford English and
Webster'sNewWorld dictionaries, maintained that thename
"Eskimo"derived fromaproto-Algonkianroottranslatingas
"eatersoftherawflesh." Infact, thename originatedinthe
Montagnais language and had no such meaning. Eskimos
refertothemselves withterms thattranslateas"realpeople"
or authentic human beings."These self-namesvaryfromone
Eskimo languagetoanother and includethenames"Inuit,"
"Inummaariit," "Inuvialat," "Inupiat," "Yup'ik," "Suxpiat,"
and "Unangan."Thestrengthof thebeliefbyEskimos
them-selves in the pejorative connotations of their name was a
majorfactorin its replacement, in Canada andGreenland
since the 1970s, by the designation "Inuit," an ethnonym
used by easternArctic Eskimos and Canadian Arctic
Eski-mos. In Alaska and Siberia, however, the term has never
takenroot. Althoughthe Eskimos of thewesternArcticare
indeed members ofthelargerfamilyofEskimo cultures,they
refer to themselves in their own language as "Yup'ik,"
"Inupiat," or "Unangan."Tocall them "Inuit"is inaccurate,
and thereis noall-encompassingnative namefor theentire
nativepopulationof theArctic.
tory,and cultural persistence ofthirty-sevenEuropean ethnicgroups in the United States Appended to some summariesareshort lists of publications, most of which are recent stud-iesof aparticular ethnic community or ageneral historical orcultural survey of the ethnic group Some of the information
inthese summaries is derived from The HarvardEncyclopedia
of American Ethnic Groups and We the People.These arethebasic reference resources for information about Americanethnic groups and should be consulted for additionalinfor-mationand references
SeealsoAcadians, Amish, Appalachians, Basques, bors, FrenchCanadians, Hasidim, Hutterites, Irish Travelers,Jews, Mennonites, Molokans, Mormons, Old Believers,Ozarks,Peripatetics, Rom, Shakers
Doukho-ALBANIANS In1980, 21,687Americansclaimed nianethnic ancestry and another 16,971 claimed Albanianandother ethnic ancestry Because of underreportinginthepast, this islikely an undercount, with Americansof Alba-nianancestryprobably numbering no less than 70,000.Pre-World War11 Albania was inhabited by two major culturalgroups-the Ghegs (Gegs) inthe mountainousNorth andthe Tosks (Toscs) inthe South Both groups spokemutuallyintelligible dialects of Albanian, although there were cleareconomic, religious, and social differencesbetweenthetwogroups In the United States, in-groupvariation is reflectedmore in religious differences (Greek Orthodox, Muslim,RomanCatholic) thaninthe Gheg/Tosk dichotomy MostAlbanians settled in the United States inthe early 1900s,with Boston the major community Other communitiesformed in Detroit, Chicago, Worcester (Massachusetts),andConnecticut AfterWorldWarII,acommunityof CatholicAlbaniansformedinthe Bronx,NewYork,and continuestoexistas a distinctethnic enclave.The traditional culturecen-tered on the patriarchal family, a strong sense of familyhonor, clans, and blood feuds has mostly given way to anAmericanmiddle-class life-style Butastrong sense ofAlba-nian identity survives through ethnic associations, thechurch, traditional celebrations and foods, andkinties.Alba-nian political identityisperhaps centeredmore on concernoverthe status ofAlbaniansintheKosovoregionof SerbianYugoslavia than on anticommunism
Alba-BibliographyNagi, Dennis L (1987) TheAlbanian-American Odyssey: APilotStudy oftheAlbanianCommunity ofBoston, Massachu-setts New York: AMS Press
ARMINIANS In1980, 155,693Americansclaimedmenian ancestryand another 56,928 claimed Armenian andotherethnic ancestry In Europe and the Near andMiddleEast, Armenianshave lived underthe control of theTurks,Russians, andIranians and have formed distinct ethnic mi-noritiesincountries suchasLebanon.Economicand culturalvariations amongArmeniangroups in these localeswas trans-ferred byArmenianimmigrantstothe UnitedStates Indus-
Trang 15Ar-108 European-Americans.
trialcities inthe East and Midwest, the California central
val-ley,andLosAngeles are majorArmenianpopulationcenters,
with 42 percent ofArmenian-Americans in 1980 living in
California Settlers in industrial cities first worked in the
steel, automobile, and textile industries, but quickly moved
up the economic ladder, using business and technical skills
brought with them fromArmenia totheNewWorld The first
Armenians incentralCaliforniawerefarm workers, andthey,
too, quickly moved up the economic ladder, as shop and
landowners In both locations, the rapid economic mobility
was accompanied byrapid assimilation, reflected in the loss
of the Armenian language and a high rate of intermarriage
The most recent arrivalsare those who have emigrated from
the Soviet Union (and indirectly from Turkey and the Middle
East) since 1976 to the Los Angeles area Sincethe 1960s,
there has been a strong ethnic revival reflected in Armenian
schools, language programs, contacts with Armenians in the
Soviet Union, and concernover the continuing
Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict there
BibliographyHenry, Sheila A (1978) Cultural Persistenceand Socioeco-
nomic Mobility: AComparative Study ofAssimilation among
Armeniansand JapaneseinLosAngeles.SanFrancisco: Rand
E Research Associates
Mirak, Robert (1983) Torn between Two Lands: Armenians
inAmerica, 1890 to WorldWar1.Cambridge: Harvard
Uni-versity Press
Phillips, Jenny K (1987) Symbol, Myth, and Rhetoric: The
Politicsof Culturein anArmenian-AmericanPopulation.New
York: AMS Press
Rollins, Joan H., ed (1981).Hidden Minorities:The
Persist-enceof Ethnicity in AmericanLife Washington, D.C.:
Univer-sity PressofAmerica
AUSTRIANS In1980,339,789Americansclaimed
Aus-trian ancestry and another 608,769 claimed Austrian and
other ancestry Unlike many other Euopean nations,Austria
was not formed on a distinct ethnic population base, and
thus Austrians aremoreaccuratelydescribedas anationality
than as an ethnic group.Austrianswho have settledinthe
United States,includingasizable minorityof Jews, have
as-similated rapidlyintoAmericansocietyand tendto seetheir
Austrianidentity as avariantofGermanidentity
See also Germans
BELGIANS In 1980 there were 122,814Americanswho
claimed Belgian ancestry and another 237,463 who claimed
Belgian and other ethnic ancestry ThenationofBelgiumwas
and isinhabitedbytwodistinctgroups-the Flemish inthe
coastalnorthwest (in the regioncommonly calledFlanders),
who speak alanguagecloselyrelatedtoDutch, and the
Wal-loonsintheeastandsoutheast, whospeakFrench This
dis-tinction has been maintained in the UnitedStatesandis
re-flectedinthe separate settlementsestablishedbyimmigrants
from each groupinthe nineteenth andtwentieth centuries
Most of the pre-1920 immigrants were Flemish and they
tendedtosettle in areasalreadysettledbythe Dutch
(espe-ciallyinMichiganandWisconsin), althoughtheywereoften
excluded from Dutch communities because of Dutch Catholicism Walloons tended to settle near French orFrench-Canadian communities, and the large Walloon com-munity near Green Bay, Wisconsin, began inthis way Al-though some features of Walloon or Flemish culture survivedinto themid-twentieth century such as cycling clubs, choralsocieties, and community newspapers, both groups are nowlargelyassimilated into American society and are seen by oth-ers asof Belgian rather than of distinctively Flemish or Wal-loon ancestry
anti-BYELORUSSIANS (Belorussians, Kryvians, Whitesians, White Ruthenians) There are about 200,000 people ofByelorussian ethnic ancestry in theUnited States today This
Rus-isvery likely anunderestimate, as those who arrived prior toWorld War I(and whose descendants are the majority of Bye-lorussians in the United States today) were identified as ei-ther Russians or Poles Byelorussiaisthe region that today islocated in the Soviet Union south and east of Lithuania andLatvia Aswith manypeoples from Eastern Europe, theBye-lorussians arrived in two major waves: 1880 to World War Iand after WorldWar11.Both groups tendedtosettleinlargeindustrial cities in the Northeast and Midwest The descen-dants of the firstwave arenowmuchassimilated into Ameri-cansociety Those whoarrived after World War11and theirchildrenhave emphasized their Byelorussian identity throughformation of their own church communities, parochialschools,associations, anti-Soviet sentiment, a language pres-ervationprogram,and the celebration of ethnic holidays andlife-cycle events following traditional customs
BibliographyKipel, Vitaut (1982) Byelorussian Americans and Their Com-munities ofCleveland.Cleveland: Cleveland State University.CARPATHO-RUSYNS (Carpatho-Russians,Carpatho-Ukrainians, Rusnaks,Ruthenians,Uhro-Rusyns) Carpatho-Rusyns in the United Statestoday are mainly third- or fourth-generationdescendantsofCarpatho-Rusynswhoimmigrated
toNorthAmericabetween1880and 1914 Carpatho-Rusynsspoke East Slavic dialects closely related to Ukrainian In
1980about 600,000Americans wereofCarpatho-Rusyncestry,although only 8,485 claimed such ancestry in the 1980census This is inpartbecause manyidentifythemselves asUkrainians or Russians and because the U.S census nolonger considers the Carpatho-Rusyns as a distinct group.The homeland of the Carpatho-Rusyns is the Carpathianmountains in what are the modem nations ofPoland andCzechoslovakia and the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.Initial settlementwas inthe mining and industrial regions ofPennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Ohio, Illinois, andConnecticut.Ethnicidentitywasclosely tiedtotheiridentity
an-as Ean-asternChristians, expressed through membershipin theByzantine Rite Catholic church or Orthodox churches.Carpatho-Rusyn services contained a number of uniqueprac-tices,mostnotablyaliturgical chant using folk melodies stillsung by groupstoday.Partlybecauseof the absence ofadis-tinct country of national origin,a senseofCarpatho-Rusynethnicidentity has largelydisappearedintheUnitedStates
In the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, people ofCarpatho-Rusyn ancestrynow seethemselvesasUkrainians
In1931,asubgroupcalled theLemkians,composedofpeople
Trang 16Eurobean-Americans 109
from the Lemkian region of southeastern Poland formed a
separateethnicassociation.They have madeastrong effortto
maintaintheir ethnicidentity through an active press,
con-cem about their nationalidentity, and the maintenance of
sometraditional practices
See also Ukrainians
BibliographyMagocsi, PaulR (1984) OurPeople: Carpatho-Rusynsand
Their Descendants inNorthAmerica Toronto: Multicultural
History Society ofOntario
CROATS (Croatians) In 1980, 107,855 Americans
claimed Croatian ancestry and another 145,115 claimed
Croatianandotherethnicancestry.This isprobablyagross
undercount,asmany CroatsareidentifiedasYugoslaviansor
Serbs A figure of at least 500,000isprobably a more accurate
estimate ofthe numberofpeople of Croatian ancestryinthe
United States Croatiais oneof thesix constituentrepublics
ofthemodem nation ofYugoslavia The U.S census has
usu-ally classified Dalmatians, who liveon theAdriatic coast of
Yugoslavia, as Croats.Inthe late 1700s and early 1800s
Dal-matianfishermen settled in Louisiana, where they were able
to continuetheir maritimetraditions The major migration of
Croatsoccurred between 1880and World WarIwhenthey
formed Croatian communities in industrial and mining
townsand cities inPennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois,andIndiana
MostCroats are RomanCatholic, althoughchurch
member-ship did not play a major roleinthe establishment of
Croa-tian communities asitdid with other groups.Croatshave
as-similated moreslowlyinto Americansocietythan many other
groups, and it was not until the mid-1950s that inner-city
Croatian neighborhoods begantobreak upthrough
outmi-gration tothe suburbs Factorsinvolvedinthemaintenance
of Croat communitieswerestrongextendedfamilytiesanda
pattern ofsonssettlinginthesamecommunityandworking
inthesamefactoriesastheir fathers.SinceWorldWar 11 at
least 60,000 Croats have settled in the United States and
have led a renewal of Croat ethnic identity, through ties
maintained with the homeland and a revitalized Croatian
press
BibliographyBennett, Linda (1978) Personal Choice in Ethnic Identity
Maintenance:Serbs, Croats and Slovenes in Washington Palo
Alto,Calif.: R andE ResearchAssociates
Kraljec, Francis (1978) Croation Migration to andfrom the
United States PaloAlto, Calif: Ragusan
Prpic,G.J. (1978) South Slavic Immigration in America
Bos-ton: Twayne
CZECHS In 1980, 788,724 Americans claimed Czech
ancestry and another 1,103,732 claimed Czech and other
ethnic ancestry Thisfigure may be somewhat inflated asit
in-cludes both ethnic Czechs and Czechoslovaks, some of
whom may beethnically Slovak rather than Czech Czechsin
the United States today are mainly descendants ofpeople
who emigrated from Bohemia and Moravia between 1850
and 1914, the two major regions of the Czech area of the
na-tionofCzechoslovakia.Czechs settled bothinfarming
com-munities (in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Nebraska, Iowa, SouthDakota, and Texas) and in cities (New York, Cleveland, Chi-cago, andOmaha) Czechsettlers differed from otherEuro-pean ethnicgroupsin a number of ways First, they had anunusually lowreturn-migration rate Second, many left theRomanCatholic church and either convertedto Protestant-ism oreschewed formalreligious affilation altogether Third,although they never were a unified group, they assimilatedrelatively slowly, in part because of values that stressed indi-vidual and family self-reliance and because ofties to thehomeland After the 1920s, Czech identity began to weaken
as few new immigrants arrived, children attended publicschools, and intermarriage becamecommon
After the communist takeover of Czechoslovakia in
1948, 35,000 CzechoslovakiansfledtotheUnited States and
anadditional 10,000 or so arrived after the failed 1968 lution.Thesegroupscontained many professionals who oftenstayed apart from the established Czech communities in theUnited States The Czech presence still reflects considerableinternaldiversity (rural/urban, early/later immigrants)
revo-BibliographyBicha, Karel D (1980) "Community of Cooperation? TheCase of the Czech-Americans." InStudies inEthnicity: TheEastEuropean Experiencein America,edited by C A Ward,
P.Shashko,andD E.Pienkos, 93-102 Boulder: East pean Monographs
Euro-Jerabek, Esther(1976).Czechsand SlovaksinNorthAmerica:
ABibliography New York:CzechoslovakSocietyof Arts andSciences in America
Skrabanek, R L (1985) We're Czechs College Station:Texas A&MUniversity Press
DANES In1980,428,619Americans claimed Danish cestryand another 1,089,654claimed Danish and other an-cestry Most Danes immigrated to the United States in thelast half of the nineteenth century Mormon missionarieswere active inDenmarkafter 1850, and a sizable contingent
an-of Danes settled in farm communitiesinUtah andsouthernIdaho The descendants of these Danish Mormonsaccounttoday for about 9 percent of Danes in the United States.Mostimmigrantssettled inthe Midwest, primarily in Wiscon-sin, Iowa, and Minnesota Thereisalso a sizable Danish an-cestrypopulation inCalifornia, mostly the product of migra-tion west following initial settlement elsewhere Danesassimilated more quickly than other Scandinavianpeoples,inpart because of theirrelatively few numbers and wide disper-sal, which encouraged marriage to non-Danes and a morerapid loss of the Danishlanguageand adoption ofEnglish.Today, a sense of Danish ethnicity survives through theDansk Samvirke(the Association ofDanesAbroad),tours toDenmark, and Danish customs as part of the Christmascele-bration
BibliographyHale, Frederick, ed (1984) Danes in North America Seattle:University ofWashington Press
Mackintosh,Jette(1988) "'Little Denmark'onthePrairie: A
Trang 17I 10 European-Americans
Studyof the Towns ofElk Horn and Kimballton inIowa."
Journal of American Ethnic History 7:46-68
Nielsen, George R (1981) The Danish Americans Boston:
Twayne
DUTCH In 1980, 1,404,794 Americans claimed Dutch
ancestry and another 4,899,705 claimed Dutch and other
ethnic ancestry Inthe UnitedStates, Frisians, who form a
distinctethnic groupinthe Netherlands andWestGermany
areclassifiedasDutch After Henry Hudson "discovered" the
Hudson River during his exploration of 1610-1611, the
Dutch established the colony of New Netherland in the
Hudson and Delaware rivervalleysand the city ofNew
Am-sterdam on lower Manhattan Island Following the loss of the
colony to the Englishin 1664, someDutch settlers removed
toadjacent areas inwhatarenow NewYork State and New
Jersey Manypeople of Dutch ancestrystill live in theseareas,
although their numbers have been swelled by later Dutch
im-migrants whoworkedinthe factoriesin northern NewJersey
MostDutch immigrants (80percent) wereProtestants, with
the densest concentration being Dutch Calvinistswho
con-tinue to be a majorpolitical-economic-social force in a
four-hundred-square-mile regionof southwestern Michigan The
major concentration of Dutch Roman Catholics is found
acrossLake MichiganineasternWisconsin.Other Dutch
set-tlements were started and continue to flourish in Bozeman,
Montana,and northwestern Washington State The most
re-cent Dutch immigrants are mostly native Indonesians who
fledtothe Netherlands from their countryinthe 1960s, with
some subsequently immigrating to the United States The
largenumber of negative phrases with the word Dutch such as
Dutch treat orDutch courage can beattributed to the
anti-Dutch sentimentsofthe early English colonists
BibliographyBratt, James D (1984).Dutch CalvinisminModern America:
AHistory ofaConservativeSubculture.Grand Rapids, Mich.:
William B Eerdmans
Swierenga,Robert P., ed (1985).The Dutch in America:
Im-migration, Settlement, and Cultural Change New Brunswick,
N.J.: RutgersUniversity Press
Van Hinte,Jacob (1985) Netherlanders in America: A Study
ofEmigrationand Settlementinthe 19th and 20thCenturies in
theUnited States ofAmerica.Robert P Swierenga, general
edi-tor Adriaan de Wit,chief translator Grand Rapids, Mich.:
Baker Book House
ENGLISH In 1980, 23,748,772 Americans claimed
En-glish ancestry and another 25,849,263claimed English along
with other ethnic ancestry These figures include those
claim-ing Cornish ancestry but not those ofManx ancestry, who
numbered 50,000 in 1970 Americans of English ancestry are
sometimes referred to as White Anglo-Saxon Protestants
(wAsp,) and those in New England, as Yankees The English
were the primarycolonizers of what becametheUnited States
and werethe major shapers of the American economy,
politi-cal system, society, andculture Although American society
isnow ablendingofbeliefs and practices from dozens of cul
tures, themostfundamental featuresofAmericanlife, such
asthe use of the Englishlanguage and the legal system, reflectEnglish traditions People of English ancestry are settledacrossthe entireUnitedStateswith major concentrations inMaine, theAppalachian and Ozark regions, and the Mormonregion of Utah and southern Idaho.The few areas with rela-tively low percentages of English-Americans are New YorkCity, areas of SouthwestTexaswithlarge Mexican-Americanpopulations, and those sections of Nevada and the Dakotaswith large American Indianreservations
Seealso Appalachians, Mormons, Ozarks, Shakers
BibliographyEwart, Shirley (1987) Cornish Mining Families of GrassVal-ley, California New York: AMS Press
ESTONLANS Because emigrants from Estonia arrivingbefore1922wereusuallylistedasRussians,the number ofEs-
tonianswho came to the United States and the number ofcurrent Estonian-Americans are unknown Estimates placetheir numberat about 200,000, with over half in the Mid-Atlantic and New England regions, 19 percent on the WestCoast, and 15 percent inthe Great Lakes area The home-land iscurrently the Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic TheEstonianlanguage is related to Finnish, and Estonian culturehas been strongly influenced by Scandinavian traditions.MostEstonian-Americansaredescendants of people who ar-rived between 1890 and World War 1 An influx of about15,000 Estoniansafter WorldWar 11has bothincreased thepopulationand stimulatedarebirth of Estonian ethnic iden-tity The Estonians today are unified by strong nationalisticand anticommunist sentiments and active local, regional, na-tional, and international ethnic associations At the sametime, a high intermarriage rate and a middle-class life-styleare drawing many people in the younger generations intomainstream society
BibliographyParming, Tonu, and ImreLipping(1979) Aspects of CulturalLife Estonian Heritage in America Series New York: Esto-nian Learned Society in America
Walko,Ann M (1988) Rejecting the Second-Generation pothesis: Maintaining Estonian Ethnicity in Lakewood, NewJersey NewYork: AMS Press
Hy-FINNS In 1980, 267,902Americans claimed Finnish cestryand another 347,970 claimed Finnish and other ethnicancestry Finnish immigration took place mainly from the1860s on,with most settlingand continuing to live innorth-
an-ern Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota In 1980, 38 cent ofFinnish-Americans lived in this area The original lurefor many Finnishmen waswork in miningand the sawmillsand on the railroads, although manyeventually establishedsmall farms Up to about 1920, Finnish identity remainedstrong and was maintained by the interlocking ties ofchurches, temperance groups, labor unions, andpoliticalpar-ties Themembership and influence of these groups, however,waned after 1920, leading to rapidassimilation
per-BibliographyFinnish Americana: A Journal ofFinnishAmerican History andCulture New York Mills, Minnesota