Journal of trade science vol 9 no2 6 2021 spin offs academic enterprise from universities around the world and the problems posed to vietnam's higher education Journal of trade science vol 9 no2 6 2021 spin offs academic enterprise from universities around the world and the problems posed to vietnam's higher education
Trang 1Vu Thanh Tu ANH - Fulbright University in Vietnam, USA
Le Xuan BA - Centural Institude for Economic Managerment, Vietnam
Hervé B BOISMERY - University of La Reuinion, France
H Eric BOUTIN - Toulon Var University, France
Nguyen Thi DOAN - Vietnam Learning Promotion Association, Vietnam
Haasis HANS - Dietrich - Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics (isl) Bremen - Germany
Le Quoc HOI - National Economic University, Vietnam
Nguyen Thi Bich LOAN - Thuong mai University, Vietnam
Nguyen Hoang LONG - Thuong mai University, Vietnam
Nguyen MAI - Vietnam Economist Association, Vietnam
Duong Thi Binh MINH - University of Economics HoChiMinh City, Vietnam
Hee Cheon MOON - Korean Trade Research Association, South Korea
Bui Xuan NHAN - Thuong mai University, Vietnam
Luong Xuan QUY - Vietnam Economicst Association, Vietnam
Nguyen Van Song - Vietnam National University of Agriculture
Nguyen TAM - California State University, USA
Truong Ba THANH - University of Danang, Vietnam
Dinh Van THANH - Institude for Trade Research, Vietnam
Do Minh THANH - Thuong mai University, Vietnam
Le Dinh THANG - University of Québec à Trois Riviéres, Canada
Tran Dinh THIEN - Vietnam Institute of Economics, Vietnam
Nguyen Quang THUAN - Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, Vietnam
Le Nhu TUYEN - Grenoble École de Managment, France
Washio TOMOHARU - Kwansei Gakuin University, Japan
Zhang YUJIE - Tsinghua University, China
THE MEMBERS
EDITOR IN CHIEF DINH VAN SON DEPUTY EDITOR IN CHIEF
SECRETARY OF EDITORIAL OFFICE
PHAM MINH DAT EDITOR IN ENGLISH NGUYEN THI LAN PHUONG EDITORIAL SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL
Dinh Van SON - Thuong mai University, Vietnam - President
Pham Vu LUAN - Thuong mai University, Vietnam - Vice President
Nguyen Bach KHOA - Thuong mai University, Vietnam - Deputy President
Trang 2Trade Science
C O N T E N T S
1 Trang, T T T - The impact of working capital management on the financial performance of
manufacturing companies: a context of plastic companies in Vietnam
2 Viet, N H and Duc, D L - A research on the Impact of Organizing Strategic Market
Implementation on Business Performance of Hanoi Trade Corporation
3 Thao, T V and Huyen, V T - The Impacts of Linkages on the Development of Vietnam's
Supporting Industry in the Context of the Covid-19: Approach to the Inter-Sector Balance Sheet
Method
4 Huyen, L T - The Impact of Internal Factors on the Profitability of Listed Food Producing
Companies in Vietnam
5 Nhan, N T T and Duong, V T - A study on student satisfaction in tourism industry-specific
training programs
6 Hieu, H M - Study on Factors Affecting the Choice of Logistics Service Provider of
Vietnamese Customers in the Covid-19 Discussion Period
7 Toan, D V - Spin-offs Academic Enterprise from Universities Around the World and the
Problems Posed to Vietnam's Higher Education
8 Uyen, N T U and Niem, L T - The Impact of Diversification on Idiosyncratic Risk of
Listed Companies on Vietnam Stock Market
9 Linh, N P and Khanh, C T - The Relationship of Absorption Capability, Cross-Channel
Integration Capability and Firm Performance of Retail Enterprises
10 Uyen, N T U and Niem, L T - The Impact of Diversification on Idiosyncratic Risk
of Listed Companies on Vietnam Stock Market
11 Nhung, D T H - Studying the Effect of Goodwill on the Market Value of Companies
Page
3 10
26 39 48 61 70 83 97 108
ISSN 1859-3666
Trang 31 Introduction
After World War II, the education and training
of highly qualified human resources and scientific
research have always been considered the primary
missions of higher education institutions (HEIs)
For the last three decades, the delivery and transfer
of research findings has been considered the third
mission In particular, forming a Spin-off
enter-prise, promoting business start-ups to
commercial-ize has become a phenomenon that many scholars
are interested in researching and is considered the
fourth mission of HEIs (Kretz and Sá, 2013; Boffo
and Cocorullo, 2019) This transition requires a
redefinition of values, organizational structure,
uni-versity governance policies and mechanisms Now,
universities have formed connections between
aca-demic entrepreneurs and society These connections are formed through many modes of knowledge transfer, technology transfer and commercialization through the operations of enterprises that are derived from technologies, research results, and participation of individual scientists in the universi-ties These enterprises are collectively referred to as
“Spin-offs academic enterprises” or “Spin-offs” Promoting entrepreneurship, forming Spin-offs enterprises is considered a key mechanism for HEIs
to perform the third mission This is also considered
a characteristic of the current university model -entrepreneurial university (Chang et al., 2016; Dinh Van Toan, 2020)
Governments of countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Journal of Trade Science 9:2 (2021) 70 - 82 ISSN 1859-3666
TMU’S JTS
©
SPIN-OFFS ACADEMIC ENTERPRISE FROM
UNIVERSITIES AROUND THE WORLD AND THE
PROBLEMS POSED TO VIETNAM'S HIGHER
EDUCATION
Dinh Van Toan University of Economics and Business - VNU Email: dinhvantoan@vnu.edu.vn
Received: 1 st October 2020 Revised: 17 th November 2020 Approved: 24 th November 2020
T he article focuses on Spin-offs companies and the policies supporting these enterprises from
uni-versities in a number of countries around the world Based on published academic research and results of research on the current situation in Vietnamese universities, this article raises issues of concern about the policy and institutional reform of Vietnam's universities in the current context In addition to the need for institutional reform and a change in the environment for business development from universities, comprehensive autonomy for universities to innovate organizing structure, encourage startups and promote commercialization is an urgent issue
Keywords: Academic enterprise, Spin-offs, Spin-off enterprise, entrepreneur university, university education JEL Classifications: I20, I23, I29
Trang 4see Spin-offs as a way to promote regional
develop-ment This push is performed through fostering
net-working between laboratories, research and
busi-ness, fostering new technologies and creating a
dynamic environment that supports entrepreneurs
Spin-offs receive additional attention for their role
as an intermediary among connected research
com-munities between universities, industry and society
Many spin-offs have research or consulting
con-tracts with close ties to their parent organization
(Callan, 2001) Spin-offs not only make a
signifi-cant contribution to business operations as noted in
the US, this large number of enterprises is the most
vivid mechanism for commercialization of
knowl-edge and technology created in their parent
institu-tions - the universities Therefore, the study of
Spin-offs from HEIs has great significance in the context
of a paradigm shift from traditional university to
entrepreneurial university These enterprises
pro-mote the transfer and commercialization of
scientif-ic research products and start-up activities in
univer-sities (Dinh Van Toan, 2020)
This article presents the results of the review of
published documents worldwide on Spin-off
enter-prise and the survey results on business
develop-ment and related policies in Vietnam in 2018 and
2019 Survey results show that there is no officially
disclosed data and information in Vietnam about
Spin-offs from HEIs However, analyzing the
short-comings of policies in university education and the
current situation of transferring and
commercializ-ing scientific research results from universities, as
well as some lessons from policy from some
coun-tries around the world help to recognize more
deeply the problems posed in Vietnam in the context
of promoting university autonomy,
knowledge-based socio-economic development
2 Overview of studies on Spin-off enterprises
In the past three decades, there have been many
studies by academia and the OECD on the process
of forming and developing Spin-offs Spin-offs are
the name given to a category of enterprises formed
and developed by technology from public
organi-zations The "Spin-off" phenomenon has appeared since the early 1980s in many countries around the world The research on this type of business has a wide scope, which includes the association with the parent organizations which are public organiza-tions and HEIs According to Callan (2001), there
is no general definition of Spin-offs in worldwide literature and technology policy This term is used quite loosely, but generally refers to new, small businesses using high technology or in-depth knowledge with intellectual capital originating from a public university or research institution (Djokovic et al., 2008) Academic studies also agree that spin-offs are a typical form of new busi-nesses created to commercialize intellectual prop-erty generated by research institutions and univer-sities, where employees can be seconded or trans-ferred from a research institution to a new
compa-ny (Isabelle, 2014)
With the aim of developing a generally accepted definition, the OECD conducted a survey on percep-tions about Spin-offs enterprises for member coun-tries The options are any new company that: (1) has
a founder from a public sector or university; (2) formed from licensing technology from a public university or research institution (institute, center); (3) has a student or alumni as one of the founders; (4) started in a technology incubator or technology park affiliated with the public sector or a university; (5) having a national university or laboratory under-taking equity investments The list of options above may not be comprehensive and may not be satisfac-tory for all countries For example, the Government
of Canada proposes to consider Spin-offs to include
a public organization directly setting up a company
to provide a test product or service; Some analysts want to clarify the difference between companies that have received support from the parent organiza-tion and those that have completely left the parent organization without receiving any help to pursue the project In general, the views have created con-ceptual consistency in spin-off studies with flexibil-ity and natural diversflexibil-ity in these types of
Trang 5enterpris-es As such, there is a distinction between the
com-panies that have shares held by the parent
organiza-tion in the public sector which are called Spin-offs,
and companies that are licensed to technology from
the public entity but have no owner’s equity from
the parent organization - known as Spin-outs
(Callan, 2001)
In addition to Callan’s, many of the studies by
prominent scholars such as: Ndonzuau et al (2002);
Bekkers et al (2006); Konrad and Truffer (2006);
Rasmussen (2008); Sætre et al (2009); Wright et al
(2009); Erden and Yurtseven (2012) and Isabelle
(2014) have analyzed the theory and presented
empirical data on the spin-offs formation, the
sup-port policies from the governments and universities
in different countries In particular, Ndonzuau et al
has identified four stages of spin-offs from
univer-sity that were associated with the technology
valu-ation process as well as the original ideas, the
qual-ity of the business projects to the formation and
development of the Spin-offs The four-stage model
identifies various changes that research results must
go through in order to have the end result in
eco-nomic value creation: research results → business
ideas → projections of new venture project →
com-pany spin-off → economic value (Ndonzuau et al.,
2002) Recently, Borges et al (2013) pointed out
that university, entrepreneur and technology are the
three main elements of the "spin-off" process from
the university The study of Boffo and Cocorullo
(2019) on Spin-offs in Italian universities further
clarifies the theory and practice about the strong
development of this type of enterprise from
univer-sities In the entrepreneurial university model,
Spin-offs have become an important component
(Dinh Van Toan, 2020)
Regarding factors influencing Spin-offs
devel-opment, the study by Saetre et al (2009) examined
the similarities and differences of Spin-offs from
three Norwegian countries, USA and Sweden The
results showed that four important components are:
university relations; policies and support
mecha-nisms from the government; relations with
indus-tries; relations with venture capitalists and other funding sources In Vietnam, survey results from universities in 2018 and in-depth interviews with managers at public and private universities show that there is no official data on Spin-offs The results
of the business formation stages from HEIs are very limited (Dinh Van Toan, 2019) Therefore, in addi-tion to business formaaddi-tion results, the article focuses
on two main related issues: government policy and the role of universities and academic entrepreneurs
in formation and development of Spin-offs from Vietnamese universities From these results, the issues posed to policy-makers and governance in higher education will be pointed out towards the goal of reforming policies and mechanisms to accel-erate the process of formation and completion of the organizational model of Spin-offs enterprises in Vietnam
3 Spin-off enterprises from university: for-mation process, features and role
For HEIs, Spin-offs can be conceptualized as companies that take on new technology and evolve from universities through intellectual property com-mercialization and transfer of technology Pirnay et
al (2003) define Spin-offs as newly created compa-nies to commercially exploit some of the knowledge, technology or research results developed in a univer-sity Pattnaik et al (2014) summarized some defini-tions from researchers as shown in Table 1 The sum-mary table shows that the most common characteris-tics of Spin-offs from the university are: a separate legal entity; is not an extension of or controlled by a HEI; performs business through the extraction of knowledge from or pursuing academic activities in schools; and is aimed at generating profits and com-mercializing the technology (Table 1)
Boffo and Cocorullo (2019), when studying the formation and strong development of Spin-offs in Italian universities, claimed that the Spin-offs from universities can be considered as an enterprise founded by individuals which are former employees
of a parent organization-the university-whose core technology was transferred from the parent
organi-Journal of Trade Science ISSN 1859-3666
TMU’S JTS
©
Trang 6zation From the above studies, the distinctly
identi-fiable signs of a newly established Spin-off
enter-prise compared to conventional enterenter-prise are
shown in Table 2
Spin-offs have an important role in
socio-eco-nomic development First, these companies are the
bridge to attract investment, promote technology
transfer and commercialize research results from
universities to the market In practice, many
research projects and tasks prior to the formation of
Spin-offs can be research contracts or consulting
with close relationships with parent organizations
-the university Spin-offs are now -the quickest
path-ways for ideas and technologies from university
scientists to be commercially exploited (Callan,
2001) Theoretical and practical research has shown
that the commercialization of ideas from
universi-ties in general requires the continuous participation
of academic inventors, so these companies are seen
as the most effective way for commercialization in
universities
With a decisive role in promoting
commercial-ization, Spin-offs have become an important
com-ponent of the entrepreneurial university model
(Dinh Van Toan, 2020) According to Saetre et al,
the indirect effects of spin-offs may be even more
impactful than the direct effects listed above Examples of indirect contributions include: attract-ing and retainattract-ing quality lecturers, attractattract-ing fund-ing for commercialization (especially high-risk projects), increasing research productivity of lectur-ers, student training, positively impacts regional economic diversification and development (Saetre
et al., 2009)
According to Callan (2001), in addition to the important position of enterprises in innovation at universities, developing Spin-offs is also part of a broader package of government policies to promote
an entrepreneurial environment, fosters links between universities with industries and the public sector As such, the Spin-offs filled the gap between research activities from university, from the public sector to the private and corporate sectors Governments also use Spin-offs to encourage the connection of research laboratories with business, thereby fostering the development of industries with new technologies and creating dynamic environ-ments to support entrepreneurs
4 Results and experiences from other countries
Increase the number of Spin-offs formed:
In Europe: UK researchers show that the number
of these companies has increased continuously from
Table 1: Some definitions of Spin-offs from university
Sources: Pattnaik et al., 2014
Trang 7161 in 2004 to 187 in 2006 From 2004 to 2006, of
these companies, there were 24 companies with a
successful initial public offering (Wright et al.,
2009) In the Netherlands, according to Bekkers et
al (2006), in 2006 alone, 499 Spin-offs enterprises
from universities were established In Italy, between
2000 and 2007, an average of 100 Spin-offs were
formed from new business projects each year By
the end of 2015, there were 1,254 Spin-offs
estab-lished from universities and research organizations,
in which, the total number of Spin-offs established
from universities in the years 2011-2014 is 1,115
(Boffo and Cocorullo, 2019)
America: In Canada, Rasmussen (2008) showed
that if the total number of Spin-offs from universi-ties and hospitals in the country in 1999 was only
471, by 2001 it increased to 680 then by 2003 this figure had reached 876 Although the data are incomplete, the statistics show that the US is the leading country in the formation of Spin-offs based
on research in the field Erden and Yurtseven (2012) suppose: in the US, according to the report of 132 leading universities, there were 279 companies established in 1998; if we include companies
found-ed by students, lecturers, and alumni that are not licensed from universities, the numbers are much
Journal of Trade Science ISSN 1859-3666
TMU’S JTS
©
Table 2: Signs of Spin-off enterprises founded from universities
Source: Compiled by author
Trang 8larger In 20 years since the ratification of the
Bayh-Dole Act (1980-1999), Spin-offs contributed $ 33.5
billion to the economy and created 280,000 jobs On
average, each year more than 200 Spin-off
compa-nies are registered from 132 universities Also
according to Erden and Yurtseven, it can be
estimat-ed that within the 10 years since the early 1990s, the
number of Spin-offs established only in relation to
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and
Cambridge University has reached thousands, of
which are formed mainly by alumni (Erden and
Yurtseven, 2012)
In Asia, Singapore is one of the most active
countries in developing the Spin-offs company
model over the past two decades In just 5 years
(2000-2004), 54 Spin-offs were established from
National University of Singapore (NUS) with abun-dant investment from the government, along with significantly improved mechanisms and administra-tive procedures (Dinh Van Toan, 2019)
The aggregate data on the number of Spin-off companies established from universities in some countries around the world are listed in Table 3 These are incomplete but partly illustrate the strong development in terms of the number of Spin-offs from universities over the past two decades
Government supporting policies and mecha-nisms:
Around the world, government innovation poli-cies have a decisive impact on the spin-offs phe-nomenon The policies with the strongest impact are the Bayh-Dole Act in the US and the Intellectual
Table 3: The number of Spin-offs from a number of representative universities
Source: Compiled by author
Trang 9Property Transfer Act from a technology
corpora-tion (a state agency) to universities in the UK in the
1980s These policies provided US and UK
univer-sities with rights to their inventions based on
gov-ernment-sponsored research, together with
responsi-bility to commercialize their technology According
to Saetre et al (2009), similar changes have occurred
in most European and Asian countries The impact
of the Bayh-Dole Act allowing universities to sell
patents on federal government-funded research has
rapidly increased the number of technology transfer
offices (TTOs) But not only is the number of TTOs
increasing, licensing offices (TLOs) are also
increasing rapidly with patent publications, patent
applications, licensing agreements and royalties
The 2006 Association of University Technology
Managers Inc (AUTM) survey found that: in just
one decade (1996-2006), the total number of patents
filed by American universities quadrupled from
4,000 to nearly 16,000 (Saetre et al., 2009)
In addition to the afore-mentioned major laws
and policies, other changes in supporting policy
have been introduced in the US and some countries
to promote research and development cooperation
between HEIs, the industries and the private sector
to form Spin-offs A few of the main changes are:
revising patent policies to expand the technology
market, developing cooperative research and
devel-opment (R&D) associations; loosening new rules
and guidelines on the disposition of
government-owned intellectual property; supporting business
formation and development
Spin-offs often involve new technology, with the
development potential but also difficulties in
acquir-ing capital and business expansion As such,
govern-ment funding becomes even more important in
terms of capital The US government and the
gov-ernments in Europe have developed mechanisms for
financial assistance in the form of grants and public
grants Since 1982, the US government has
imple-mented Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs to finance high-risk R&D projects with commercial potential, allowing academic founders
to overcome financial hurdles through small busi-ness support programs In 2004, this program dis-bursed more than 2 billion USD to support the establishment of Spin-offs and by 2009 has awarded
a total of 112,500 companies with a total budget of 26.9 billion USD (Dinh Van Toan, 2019) In Europe, the first action plan for higher education innovation has funded the growth of spin-offs from universities (Meyer, 2003)
In Turkey, according to Erden and Yurtseven (2012), the commercialization of knowledge and science has been recognized as an important policy issue Law No 5746 focuses on this issue and pro-vides financial incentives to companies doing R&D and initial capital to support academic entrepreneurs
to form research-based businesses The Ministry of Science, Technology and Industry (MoSTI) pro-vides Seed Funding to successful entrepreneurs with technology transfer developed in universities
In Asia, Japan does not have many established Spin-offs but is a typical case in Asia with higher education that has developed in the trend of interna-tionalization since the 1990s The most common activities in university-private partnership include research cooperation, technology transfer and human resources through the “TAMA Association” project located in the high-technology park man-aged by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry In this Association, by the end of 2007, there were 355 enterprises operating with more than
100 research and development departments and 32 participating researchers from universities Singapore is also a country with successful policies
to develop higher education towards entrepreneur-ship and innovation over the past two decades In 5 years (from 1998 to 2003), more than 70 Spin-offs
Journal of Trade Science ISSN 1859-3666
TMU’S JTS
©
Trang 10were established through incubation from National
University of Singapore, Nanyang Technological
University and other science and technology
research institutes (Dinh Van Toan, 2019)
In addition to drastic changes to the legal system
in the the US, UK and Singapore, other countries
have many ways to support academic entrepreneurs
and develop spin-offs from University Many
gov-ernments support universities and new businesses to
develop products and services based on high-risk
research results (Shane, 2004) Compiling from
their own research, Konrad and Truffer also point
out other policies from governments that focus on
solving and supporting key groups of problems as
follows (Konrad and Truffer, 2006):
- Regulations on the participation of teaching
staff in enterprises: Since 2000 onwards, the
work-ing time restrictions of university lecturers have
been reduced or temporarily left the teaching
posi-tions in some countries These rules facilitate both
participation in Spin-offs businesses and academic
research in the parent organization - the university
This has a positive impact on effective interactions
between parties in teaching, research, transfer and
commercialization activities;
- Regarding intellectual property rights, the
reg-ulations regarding intellectual property created by
publicly funded research still differ between
coun-tries: Some give the rights to researchers; Some give
to the organization; Royalties from intellectual
property rights are partly distributed among
researchers and organizations In some countries,
regulations have recently been changed primarily by
transferring property rights from individual
researchers to institutions with the increased
expec-tation of the economic potential In general, the
poli-cies have been revised to loosen regulations to
increase mutual trust, promote the formation of joint
ventures in research and guide the disposition of
government-owned intellectual property
- Academic evaluation criteria and procedures:
Changes in evaluation criteria at the individual, project or organizational level have a strong influ-ence on the scientific research system and business development due to policy that encourages and affects the choice of research faculty of the faculty The criteria for evaluating and rewarding commer-cialization have influenced researchers to engage in innovation, creativity and spin-off’s activities
The role of the university and academic entre-preneur:
According to Borges et al (2013), university, entrepreneur and technology are the three main ele-ments of the "spin-off" process from universities In which, entrepreneurs and technology used as the foundation for new joint ventures come from the universities University-born entrepreneurs (acade-mic entrepreneurs) often work for Spin-offs compa-nies or participate in research on technology used by Spin-offs Therefore, universities and academic entrepreneurs have an important role to play in the creation and development of Spin-offs:
Universities can provide support for the creation
of new business projects from university-sourced research and technologies or with participating aca-demic entrepreneurs Typical examples are: licens-ing and technology transfer office; office that assists new business projects with access to the university’s network of partners; activities to promote entrepre-neurship culture, financial aid, consulting or man-agement and sales courses; etc In particular, one of the main supporting tools universities help to com-mercialize and form Spin-offs is business incubator with a variety of business support services
Academic entrepreneurs are lecturers,
researchers, undergraduates or graduate students involved in the development and implementation of business related activities They may or may not leave university after a new business venture is cre-ated and become a spin-off company Many of them