Llowever, teaching strategies are still not paid attention at Binh Xuyen high school so as for students to overcome difficulties in this skill school.. With the desire to improve student
Trang 1VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HA NOL UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
FACULTY OF POST-GRADUATE STUDIES
——caEAz>—_
TRẢN THỊ KHÁNH
A STUDY ON READING STRATEGY TRAINING FOR
GRADE 11 ENGLISIT MAJORS AT BINII XUYEN HIGH
SCHOOL, VINH PHUC PROVINCE
Luyện một số thủ thuật đọc hiệu quả cho học sinh chuyên Tiếng
Anh lớp 11, trường THPT Bình Xuyên, tỉnh Vĩnh Phúc
M.A MINOR PROGRAMME THESIS
Field: Inglish Language ‘leaching Methodology Code: 601410
HA NOT, 2013
Trang 2VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HA NOI
UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
FACULTY OF POST-GRADUATE STUDIES
—— cafe —-
TRAN TI KMANII
A STUDY ON READING STRATEGY TRAINING FOR
GRADE 11 ENGLISH MAJORS AT BINH XUYEN HIGH
SCTIOOL, VINII PITUC PROVINCE
Luyện một số thủ thuật đọc hiệu quả cho học sinh chuyên Tiếng
Anh lớp 11, trường THPT Bình Xuyên, tính Vĩnh Phúc
MLA MINOR PROGRAMME THESIS
Field: English Language Teaching Methodology Code: 60 1410
Supervisor: Dr, V6 Dai Quang
IIA NOI, 2013
Trang 3STATEMENT OF THESIS ORIGINALITY
1, [rin ‘Thi Khanh, certify that the thesis “‘Iraining strategies to 11"" grade
English notemajors al Binh Xuyon high school, Vinh phus province”, partial
fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts is the result of my own and has not been submitted for a degree to any other universities or
inslilutions.
Trang 4ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
1 would like to express my deep gratitude to my supervisor, Assoc Prof, Dr
Vo Dai Quimg, for his assistance, guidance and critical comments so thal T can
complete my study
Talso wish to send my thanks to lecturers during the M.A course, who have
helped me to Fulfill the thesis
1 owe my sincere thanks to teachers and students at Binh Xuyen high school, Vinh Phuc province, who have been enthusiastic to participate in my research
Finally, T would like to show my big gratitude to my mother, my colleagues and my friends who have encouraged me to overcome difficulties when 1 carried out
the research.
Trang 5ABTRACT
Reading is onc necessary and important skill in Icarning English Reading is also the means to gain success in learning other subjects Llowever, teaching strategies are still not paid attention at Binh Xuyen high school so as for students to overcome difficulties in this skill school As a teacher of English, 1 recognized that their results in graduation and university entrance exam are net high at Binh Xuyen high school and frequently complained by other teachers The students felt bored and afraid to cope with reading lessons With the desire to improve students’ reading skill, the author carried out the research on the training reading strategies at Binh Xuyen high school, Vinh Phuc province The purpose of the study was to investigate the cffoct of the training the strategics, give findings and uscful implications in learning and teaching reading
This study consists of three main parts
Fart A, Introduction states the background of the study and the problem Part B is the main part of the study, Development continuing with three chapters in which the
furst presents the literature review and the second describes the study in details and
analysizes the statistics Chapter three focuses on data analysis, findings and
discussions Parl Ở draws conclusions ard shows the limitations and suggestions im
the future studies
‘The rest of the thesis is Part D: REVURENCUS and Part Li: APPUNDICES
iii
Trang 6TAST OF FABLES
Table 1: Background information about the subjects of the study
Table 2-Numbers of students in score levels according to pretest and posttest results
of the Conirol group
Table 3:Mean and Standard Deviation of Pretest and Posttest according to
categories of test items and overall results of the Control group
Table 4:Numbers of students in score levels according to Pretest and Posttest
results of the Experimental group Table 5:Mean and Standard Deviation of Pretest and Postiest according to
categories of lest items and averull results of the Experimental group
Table 6:Numbers of students in score levels according to Pretest results of the
Control and Experimental group
Tuble 7-Mean and Standard Deviation of Pretest according to vategories of test
items and overall results of the Control and Experimental group
Table 8:-Numbers of students in score levels according to Posttest Results of the
Contral and Fixperimental group
Table 9:Mean and Standard Deviation of Postiest according to categories of test
items and overall results of the Conivol and Experimental group
Table 10: Mean and Standard Deviations of Overall Pretest and Posttest of Control
and Lixperimental group
Trang 7The number of students
: Vietnam National University
Trang 83.Research questions for the studiy
6 Design of the study .ccc:cecscsvsesssersesssrvensvisutstieessnseseiesvete 3
1.1 Learning sữafegies 22 tt 222211 xxree 5
1.1.2 Classification of language learning strategies wad
1.2 Delinition of reading 2c 2n rrrer 6
1.4 Reading strateples 0n seerecrrer 8
LALL, Definition of reading stralegies on are "¬ esti 8
1.4.3 The role of Reading Strategies 13 1.4.4 Reading Strategy Instruction and Primciples for Sirategies Instruction 14
1.4.5 Research om learing, and Ieaching reading siralegles 16
CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGY
2.1 Setting of the smady 26
Trang 9
2.3.1 Type oŸ method cành nh rHererrirec 37
2.3.3 Data collection Isirulnieilfs co cecnrieerrieeriieerrree 29
2.3.4 Data analysis technniques sec sen "¬¬ BO
CHAPTER 3: DATA ANALYSIS, FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS
3.1 Data analysis - - - 33
3.1.1 Comparison of the Prelest and PosLlest, Results wilhin each group 33
3.1.2 Comparison of the Pretest and Posttest Results of Uxperimental group 34 3.1.3 Comparison of the Pretest Results between Control and Experimental proup36 3.1.4 Comparison of the Postiest Results between the Control group and
2 Conoluding remarks on each of the thesis obiectives ¬
2.2 Concluding remarks on objective 2 45
3 Limitations of the study and suggestions for further study 4
3.2 Suggestions for fufure SIHdy son n0 —
Trang 10Part A: INTRODUCTION
1, Rationale for the study
It is easy to see that reading is one of essential skills at high school First, reading lessons have been systematically introduced together with other skills such as
listening, spoaking and wriling in the English textbook in Vietnam Reading always
begins each unit in the textbook then, listening or speaking and writing, The structures or new words in the reading lesson will continue to appear and be practised in the ollawing sections Second, all regular tests in Frighish class involve reading comprehension questions lispecially, the points for reading questions always make up a large number in graduate or university entrance exams
Roading is also the database that provides knowledge Cor students to enhance their
language learning and improve skills in life When students are provided with a
variety of language expressions, structures and a wide range of information, it is
gasier for them to practise the rest skills such as wriling or speaking Moreover,
reading skill is also useful in other fields of science, for example, when students
have (o study mformation tschnalogy subject or fd out malerials involved tourists, history, cven maths or chemistry in English Students may read wm order to gain
information or verify existing knowledge, do research and so on
Tn addition, reading also develops some skills in real situations in life such as
scanning the timetable when they fly by plane to go abroad or look for information
in TV or magazines in English In other cases, students can read to understand other
cultures, the relationship between people or social communication The more they
read, the more knowledgeable they become ‘therefore, it is crucial for them to read
Lnglish effectively [lowever, English reading is often said to be difficult in spite of
students’ effort The requirement for leachers is to teach their students how 1a
overcome the difficulties, but this is not an easy task
At Binh Xuyen high school, English is a compulsory subject Moreover, for the majors of Fnglish, afler graduation they will have (o take a universily enlrance
Trang 11exam, However, through observing English reading classes, the author has realized most of the students read texts at low speed They lack strategies to take advantage
of their voeabulary, linguistic or prior knowledge Lo do tasks Besides, the method
of teaching is sometimes not suitable, for example, some teachers translate the texts into Viemamese or explain too many new words, which is waste of time without
dealing with the tasks For alarementioned reasons, il’s necessary for the author to
investigate what strategies should be trained to bring effects and whether the teaching of strategies benefits students’learning of reading or not
2 Aims and objectives of the study
‘This thesis is aimed at gaining an insightful look into reading strategies with a view to improving the teaching of reading skills at Binh Xuyen high school
Objectives are set for investigation:
- Identifying the effects brought about by the 4 reading strategies to the teaching and leaming of reading skills at Binh Xuyen high school: Scanning, Skimming, and guessing vocabulary in eonlexL and Inference
~ Identifying the techniques possibly applicable to the teaching of reading
3 Research questions for the study
The aims are speciticd in two research questions:
1 To what extent does the training of four reading strategies (skimming, scanning, guessing vocabulary in context, and inference) alfect grade 11 Fnglish majors’ xeading learning at Binh Xuyen high school?
2, Tow can students’ abilities in reading be improved via four reading strategies?
4 Scope of the study
‘A learners’ success or failure in acquiring a foreign language can be affected by
many interrelated factors fram both students and teachers At high school, students
learn all Finglish skills listening, speaking, writing and grammar However, this study only focuses on the teaching some of reading strategies at Binh Xuyen high school, and the effects are brought about by those strategies
Trang 125 Significance af the study
‘The research is carried out at Binh Xuyen high school with a view to applying roading slralogics and exploring its cffeats Allhough il only focuses on 4 reading strategies for reading, its significance is remarkable Kirst, it touches on reading strategies that is often overlooked in teaching reading at Binh Xuyen high school It highlighls the imporlance of leachiryg strategies in classes With clear evidence from the study, the researcher hopes to encourage students to take advantage of self-study competence and teachers to use creative methods of teaching Second, the study
helps the aufhorteacher understand more about the students’ learning and using
reading strategies at Binh Xuyen high school ‘Third, through a thorough analysis of
the results, the author desires to share ideas and experiences with other teachers in
the school to come up wilh solutions to drawbacks cxisling in leaching Such findings will help improve both the leaming and teaching in reading in the future
Finally, useful implications from this study will be beneficial for further studies
6 Design of the study
‘The study comprises 3 main parts:
Part A is the introduction, which presents the rationale of the study, the aims
and objectives, research questions, the scope and the significance and design of the
by experts and researchers
Chapler two — Methodology — describes how the authors carried oul the
study with the participating of the students (group 1LAIO and HAI) at Binh
Xuyen high school, Vinh Phuc province The process includes administrating the pretest and posttest, teaching reading four strategics and the way of collecting, analyzing data
Trang 13Chapter three - Analyses and Findings — includes tho analyzing data, findings and the comments for each finding
Part C is the conclusion which summarizes all the mam coments of the
study, reviews objectives, limitations of cuent research and gives suggestions for
further studies
Appendixes with supplementary materials and references are included in
Part D and Part KE.
Trang 14Part B: DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW
1.1 Learning strategies
1.1.1 Definition
Learning strategies is the concept discussed much in language research Why
this person studios better, more casily and more clTectively than others? The reason
for this is the use of reading strategies Learning strategies are considered important
to comprehension, learning, or retention of the information
Many researchers describe leaming strategies from different points of view Strategies are considered as “any sets of operations, steps, plans, routines used by
the leamer to facilitate the obtaining, storage, retrieval, and use of information.”
(Wenden and Rubin, 1987) Loarning strategies bevome the means to gain success it
that “Strategies are specilic methods of approachmg a problem or task, modes of
operation for achieving a particular end, planned designs for controlling and
snanipulating certain information.” Oxford (1990-8) also defines language learning
strategies as “specific actions taken by the leaner to make Jeaming easier, faster, miore enjoyable, more self-directed, more effective, and more transferable to new
situations” In spites of amy expressions or terms, language strategies are
acknowledged to facilitate the leaming
1.1.2 Classification of language learning strategies
ification Alderson
Together with the defirition of language strategies is ils cl
(2000) reviews the classification from Rubin (1987:19) in terms of cognitive, meta-
cognitive, and communication strategies as the following:
Trang 15“Cognitive learning strategics (clarificatiowverification, guessing’ inductive inferencing; deductive reasoning; practice, memorization; and monitoring)
Mela-cognitive learning strategies (choosing, priotilization, planning, advance
preparation, selective attention and more);
Communication strategies Gncluding circumlocution/ paraphrase, formulae use, avoidance strategies and clarificalion strategies)
Social strategies”
(Rubin, 1987.20 passim)
Lee (2010:140) summarizes another classification according to Oxford (1990)
Strategies are divided into direct and indirect ones Direct strategies are “used to
deal with new language” while “indirecl ones do not dircetly involve using Ihe
language, but they support language learning.” Three groups that belong to the
direct one are memory, cognitive, and compensation strategies The indirect
siralcgics also include three groups: mota-cognilive, a{Toctive and social strategies
1.2 Definition of reading
person reads for different, purposes in native language or other second or
foreign languages Reading is considered a daily activity which is integral part of
people, so what is reading?
According lo Harmer (1991-190) reading is a mechanical process in which “cyes
receive the message and the brain then bas to work out the significance of the
message.”
Alderson and Urquhart (1984) confirm “Reading indeniably and incontrovertibly
involves two necessary elements: a reader and a text.” The third element is “the
writer.” Likewise, Nuttal (1996: 11) considers reading as “an interactive process- as
conversation because boll reader and writer depend on cue another.” He
acknowledges that the interaction is of complexity because of no writer's explaining
or facilitating at the time of reading The reader has to find out the meaning of the
Trang 16text written by the author, Consequently, there scems to be no “complete” concept
of meeting between the reader and the writer
Williams (1984:2) defines “reading is a process whereby one looks al and
understands what has been written.” Reading aloud without understanding is not called reading and requiring students to read what students knows is also considered
“an activily off very limiled value”, hawover, reading aloud is also ineluded in
xeading and is one of activities to practise pronunciation The word “understand” in
the definition is comprehended in a flexible way Ile claims that “This definition of
reading does nol mean that a foreign learner (or indeed any reader) needs to understand everything in a text.” Also, the reader does not simply work with words and sentences in a boring or passive way, but he or she is actively working on the
text He can arrive al understanding without looking af every leHer and word Tn
summary, reading is a process related to understanding written text, but it is not “an
absolute process- understanding nothing or all.” One efficient reader must know
what he/she needs and how he/she does to oblain mearung without reading
everything in the text
The aforementioned defimiions make an effort lo identily what the reading is and what is involved in reading Another term often appearing in studics on reading is
reading comprehension which is presented in the next part
1 3 Reading comprehension
Many studies confirm that the final goal of reading instruction is comprehension and one of the most important goals of skilled reading is decoding and understanding written text However, the decoding and the ability to recognize words in texts are only the beginning stages of reading and reading comprehension (Adam, 1990) The concept of comprehension is explained in a higher level by Grellet (1981), he states thal “Understanding a wrillen lex means extracting the required information from it as efficiently as possible.” Le also shows the examples
in which a good reader will omit unnecessary information and find out what he or
she is soarctring for
Trang 17Other people believe that reading comprehension is not just a receptive process, It requires many other skills in combination “It implies a complex process
in which the readers identify basic mformalion and are able lo predict, to infer, to
argue and to recognize writers’ points of view.” Diaz& Laguado (2003,p.6)
Pang, Muaka, Bembhardt and Kamil (2003), also states that “Reading is a
complex activily” in the combinalion of related processes: word recognition and
comprehension Word recognition refers to the process of perceiving how written symbols correspond to one’s spoken language Comprehension is the process of
taking sense of words, sentences and connected lext Readers typically make use
of background knowledge, vocabulary, grammatical knowledge, experience with text and other strategies to help them understand written text.”
Farris and Hodges (1995) suggest that reading comprehension is “the
construction of the meaning of a written text through a reciprocal interchange of
ideas between the reader and the message in a particular text” Aebersold (1997: 15)
also emphasives (wo “onlilics” in the reading process; Ihey are the toxt and the
veader, He adds that “the meaning the reader gets fiom the text may not exactly the
same as the mearung the writer wished to convey Because of influences from “the family, community, aptitude and other personal characteristics”, consequently,
“reading comprehension differs from one reader to another.”
Combined from the all defimlions, reading corupreicnsion can be defined as “a
fluent process of readers combining information from a text and their own background knowledge to build meaning The goal of reading is comprehension ”
(Anderson, 2000, p.68)
iratepies 1.4.1 Definition of rcading strategies
Barnel (1998) considers reading stralegies as the menial operations which
happens when a person reads effectively and makes sense of the meaning Alderson (1999-70) argues that strategies like “deliberate action that leamers select and
control lo achieve desired goals or objectives” (Winograd and Hare, 1988, p.123)
Trang 18He highlights the “active role” of the readers in using, cffoctively in obtaining
“desired results” Llowever, reading strategies are not considered “a single event” bul “a sequence of activities” and it is not hoped they can meet demands of getting all but only “some of the sequence”
In terms of monitoring text comprehension that refers to the readers’ “constantly checking lo see if the stralogics they arc using”, Smith (1988:3) states thal
“strategies that build comprehension focus on how the text progresses and the ameaning of the text as it builds sentence and paragraph by paragraph.”
Tn reading research, reading strategies may be confusing lo be understond in
comparison with reading skills It 1s said that they are used interchangeably and mutually supportive Strategies support skills, so they are placed in “complementary relations” Skills and stralgics also refer 10 the development in progress “e.g (isl
phonics skill then the comprehension strategies.” Smith (1988:364), Ilowever, a group of researchers such as Afflerbach, Pearson, and Paris (2008: 365) who try to
amake a distinction claim that skill is relaled to the “proficiency of a complex act”
and strategies refer to “a conscious and systematic plan” Skills come from
earning Wbrough practice” bul strategies from “constructive, self-controlled theories of information processing.” They also show that using skills and strategics
depends on students’ knowledge 'hey tend to use skills when their tasks are easy
and “their knowledge is strong” while stralogics are used when they de not have
enough knowledge to confront a difficult text A number of distinctions are listed:
“Skills make up strategies.”
“Strategies lead to skills.”
“Skill is the destination, strategy is the journey.”
“We learn strategies to doa skill.”
“Skills are automatic, strategies are effortful and mediated”
“We use strategies as tools.”
“Strategies that work require a skill set.”
Trang 19“We have to pay attention in Icarning skills, but eventually we use them automatically.”
“You don’L funk about skills, and you do think aboul strategics.”
Hudson (2007:105) says: “Other researchers restrict reading skills to automatic
processes and contrast those to the view that strategies are conscious and deliberate
vopair stratogies” He also cites the differences between skills and strategies by Paris
Walsik and ‘Turner (1996):
“kills refer information- processing techniques that are automatic, whether at the level of recognizing phoneme-grapheme correspondence or summarizing a story Skills are applied to text unconsciously for many reasons including expertise, repeated practice, and compliance with directions, luck, and naive use In contrast,
siralcgios are aclions sclecled delibcraicly to achieve particular goals An emerging
skill can become a strategy when it is used intentionally Likewise, a strategy can
“go underground” and become a skill Indeed, strategies are more efficient and
developmentally advanced when lhey become goncraled and applied autouralically
as skills” (Paris et all 1996; 610-11)
All the distinclions help make the definition of strategies clear and in the next pat, classification of reading strategies is presented
1.4.2 Classification of Reading strategies
Grellct (1990) provides 3 groups of techniques:
Sensitizing: Inference, Understanding relations within the sentences, linking
sentences and ideas
According to Ur (1996), an effective reader
- Concentrate on reading and is involved with the author’ logic, word usage
and ideas
- Read with goats in mind
- Visualize what is being read
- Associated new ideas with old ones through comprehension and retention
- Know most of the vocabulary
10
Trang 20- Can guess many word meanings form senteneos around the unfamiliar
words
- Used the dictionary to dolermine meanings of key and for technical words
- Use critical, logical meaning to access and apply new ideas
- Summarizes new knowledge in own words
- Use review methods with Lexls
- Integrates new ideas, fact and theory into knowledge already acquired about the subject
- Read in phrases and thought urnts , nol word by word
- Always previews material before reading
- Learn and can apply main ideas and find details as they relate to main ideas
- Make use of boll inductive and deductive reasoning
- Locate thesis statement, topic sentences, generalizations
O'Malley and Chamot (1990) classify reading strategies into cognitive, meta-
cogmilive and sovial/ affective Some items such as “Clarification or verification,
guessing or inductive inferencing, deductive reasoning, practice, memorization, and
monitoring” belong lo cognilive stralegies Other wems hike “a conscious overview
of the leaming process, making decisions about planning, monitoring, or
evaluating” are included meta-cognitive strategies
Alderson (1999:82) also gives the lisi with 24 stralegics im while reading that is
classified into three different groups: cognitive reading strategies, meta-cognitive reading strategies, and compensating reading strategies:
Cognitive Reading Strategies
1 Predicting the content of an upcoming passage or section of the text
2 concentrating on grammar to help you understand unfamiliar constructions
3 Underslanding the main idea to help you comprehend the entire reading
4, Uxpanding your vocabulary and grammar to help you increase your reading
5 Guessing the meanings of unfamiliar words or phrases to let you use what you already know aboul English
Trang 216 Analyzing thome, style, and conneetions to improve your comprehension
7, Distinguish between opinions and facts in your reading
8 Breaking down larger phrases ilo smaller paris to help you understand difficult
passages
9 Linking what you know in your first language with words in English
10 Creating a map or drawing of relatcd ideas to enable you to understand the
relationships between words and ideas
11 Writing a short summary of what you read to help you understand the main
ideas,
Meta-cognitive Reading Strategies
12 Setting goals for yourself to help you improve areas that are important to you
13 Making lisls of relevant vocabulary to prepare lor new reading
14 Working with classmates to help you develop your reading skills
15 Taking opportunities to practice what you already know to keep progress steady
16 Fvaluating what you have learned and how well you are doing to help you focus
your reading
Compensating Reading Strategies
17 Relying on what you already know to unprove your readmg comprehension
18, ‘faking notes to help you recall important details
19 trying to remember what you underslard form a reading to help you develop
better comprehension skills
20 Reviewing the purpose and tone of a reading passage so you can remember more effectively
2 Picturing scenes in your mind to help you remember and understand your reading
22 Reviewing key ideas and details to help you remember
23 Using physical action to help you remember information you have read
9A Classifying words inta meaningful groups to help you remember them more clearly
Trang 22An another classification with ten strategies relating to bottom-up procedures, and
others to top down processes is proposed by Brown (2001) :
1 Tdentily the purpose of readirys (clearly identify the purpose in reading something
s0 you will know what you are looking for),
2 Use graphemic rules and pattems to aid bottom-up decoding, especially for
begirming level learners;
3 Use efficient silent reading technique for rapid comprehension (for untermediate
to advanced levels)
4 Skim the text for main ideas (quickly rurming one’s eyes across whole text for its
gist) for prediction;
5 Scan the text for specific information (quickly searching for some particular piece
or piccas of information ina tex!)
6 use semantic mapping or clustering (group ideas meaningful clusters, helps readers to provide some order to the chaos)
7 guess when you aren't cortain (guess a meaning of a word, guess # grammatical
selationship, guess a discourse relationship, guess a discourse relationship, infer implied meaning, guess about a cultural reference and guess content messages)
8 analyze vocabulary (look for prefixes, lock for sutfixes, look for roots that are
familiar, look for grammatical contexts that may signal information, look at
semantic conlexL for clues)
9, Distinguish between literal and impled meanings;
10 Capitalize on discourse markers to process relationships
1.4.3 The role of Reading Strategies
Reading strategies play an important role in reading comprehension They are considered as centered in learning process to gain success and nowadays mare and
more ailention is paid Lo them Tt is the reason thal Anderson (1999) slates “recently, there has been a shift in attention from a focus on the product of reading (such as a
score on a reading comprehension test) to an emphasis on determining the strategies
thal readers usc im various reading conlexLs
Trang 23Various studics on reading strategics show that reading strategics can support students’ reading comprehension (Cohen, 1998, Chamot, 1999) Researchers
acknowledge (hat [ficient readers know how to oporale (heir reading slaicgies ta
achieve success while poor readers lack the development of reading, strategies O'Malley & Chamot (1990) also add that students using strategies perform better
in reading than that of students who are not provided with reading stralegics
instruction Moreover, according to (Allen, 2003; Rubin, 1987), reading strategies
activate autonomic independent learning In the reading process, students can do self-direct their learning or reading
In summary, reading strategies facilitate reading process and enable readers to construct meaning from the text effectively They direct readers on the right track
and discover the reasons why they are poor reader or how they can do to improve
reading comprehension
1.4.4, Reading Strategy Instruction and Principles for Strategies Instruction
Anderson (1999) confirms that “leaching readers how to use strategies is a prime
consideration in reading classroom.” It may be the reason why in the past decades,
so many sladies explore the teaching in reading strategies with the hope to enable students te cope with difficulties and unprove thei reading abulitics
Ina study, a group of authors such as Shohreh Raftari, Keivan Seyyedi, and Shaik
Abdul Malik Mohamed Ismail Harp( 2012) who have reviewed studies on readin,
strategies instruction draw conclusions that the teaclung strategies are “always useful” Ilowever, “its usefulness varies according to different factors such as the
teaching methods and the leamers’ personal variables.”
Using reading strategies are necessary and powerful to an efficiem reader, but to help students become such good readers, strategies instructions must be considered
The principles or how strategy astruclions are delivered im elective way are
discussed, Garner (1982, cited in Anderson, 1999) “emphasizes that low-
proficiency readers need guided practice if strategy training is to be successful
Such training ean cmphasizes the “when” and “why” of stralogy usc al least as
14
Trang 24such as the “what” Anderson pays close attention to the role of teacher in teaching
strategies [le states that “teacher explanation is an intergral part of success in
learning how Lo vorily stralogy use.” Some clements are shown clearly by Winogard
and Hare (1998, cited in Anderson, 1999): “(1) what the strategy is, (2) why the
strategy should be leamed, (3) how to use the strategy, (4) when and where the
stratogy is to be learned, and (5) how Lo evaluate the use of the strategy.” (p.71)
In addition, Hudson (2007) shows a variety of studies on second language strategy and comes to conclusion that the training must depend on “second language
alnhty and the depth of the inning” He also argues that instruction is only become
the most effective when the instructor:
1 carefully explains the nature and purpose of the strategy
2 models ils usc through reading and Uninking aloud
3 provides ample practice and feedback for the students
4, reminds students of the benefits of strategy use and encourages the independent
transfer of these skills lo new learning situation
5 provides a contem base so that strategy fearing is embedded in authentic
purposes
Other his implications for instruction are the instructional time for direct-strategy
instruction and modeling available for strategy instruction to be effective ‘The
stralogics need lo be taught in “a sufficient duration (or the training to be olfective”
The stuategies taught must be “determined through task analyses of strategies
needed.” They are suitable enough for students to do, not too difficult or not tao
easy Finally, strategies “should be presented over a number of contexts with a
variety of texts.” (p.136)
Yang (1995, p.6, cited in Shang, 1996, p.24) generalizes steps as follows
1 Diagnosis: Developing students’ awareness toward different stralegies;
identifying and assessing students’ current strategies through observations
questionnaires, interviews, diaries, self-report surveys, think-aloud procedure, ete
Trang 252 Preparation: Explaining the concept and importance of Icarning stratcgics; providing students with knowledge about language leaming strategies and
information on motivation and belief!
3 Instruction: Providing direct and informed instructions on learning strategies through explanation, modeling, practice, and integration; and providing different
praclice opportunitics with various learning lasks
4, Evaluation: Helping students evaluate their own strategy use, evaluating the whole strategy training and revising the training component if necessary
1.4.5 Research on learning and teaching reading strategies
1.4.5.1 Research on teaching reading strategies
Barnet (1988) investigates the relationships among reading strategies and perceived
siralogios usc on reading-cormprchension in a two-part stndy He firstly looks al he
strategies use, and secondly looked at the effect of a teaching intervention designed
to help students develop more effective reading strategies before, during and after
yeading The resuills indicales that studerts had belter reading comprehension with
use of reading strategies through context ‘Ihis study may show the importance of
quality and intensity of the strategy mstruction
Kern (1989) has shown the effects of strategy instruction on the study “the effects
of strategy instruction on the reading comprehension and inferential ability of
iennediate level French students” The study focuses not only om whether direc!
strategy instruction is effective, but also whether it is differentially effective depending upon second language reading ability, The subjects are fifty-three French
students in the third semester, divided into two groups The experimental group
xeceives explicit strategy instruction in reading while the Control group received the normal course without the strategy training The results indicates there is a
statistically significant difference in comprehension between the Experimental
group and the control group
Recently,the authors, Shohreh Raftari, Keivan Seyyedi, and Shaik Abdul Malik
Mohamed Tstail Hamp (2012: 26) have lisied a vanety of studies around the world:
16
Trang 26Lions (1985) explored in the influence of teaching EFL reading on the progress of students in academic reading classes of a university preparation course, comparing
iwo differen methods of reading imstruclion, , “raditional” and “lext-strategic”
Hamp-Lyons (1985) and Kern (1989) found that students who had strategy trainng
did better in reading than who did not having strategy training
Carell, Pharis and Tiberto (1989) and Pappa, Zaftrepoulou and Metalliou(2003)
also found that learners who had waining on using semantic mapping and
ametacognitive strategies outperformed those
Auerbach and Paxton (1997) conducted a study to apply 1.2 teading research findings in an ISL course classroom of non-proficient readers to discover the effects of new reading strategies on the students’ comprehension performance
Farrell (2008) did rescarch on roading strategies, argued thal effective reading
strategy training needs to include two key meta-cognitive factors: 1) knowledge of cognition 2) regulation of cognition
Taylor, Sloven, and Asher (2006) alter their mela-anulysis of reading strategy
instruction studies concluded that teaching of reading strategies influence the improvement of 1.2/ FT proficiency
These studies contribute to pedagogic implications in teaching readings strategies
and become data for ongoing research
1.4.5.2 Research on learning reading strategies in second language learning
Padron and Waxman (1988) conducted a study on the reading strategies of young TFL readers The purpose of this research was to identify the strategies the students felt that they used The population of the study was 82 third- fourth-, and fifth-grade
Hispanic KFL students ‘They were asked to complete a questionnaire with 14 items
on reading strategies and two standardized reading comprehension tests in order ta
identify which strategies they fell that they used and to examine the relalionship
between the self-reported reading strategies and reading comprehension Padron and Waxman found out seven of the strategies positively related to students” reading :
1 Summarizing in writing
17
Trang 27tạ UUnderlining important parts of the story to sec iÝ everything is remembered Self-generated questions
Checking (rough the story to see if everything ix remembered
Asking questions about parts of the story not understood
Anderson leams from his data that successful second language reading comprehension is “not simply a matter of knowing what strategy to use, but the
veader musl also know how lo use it successfully and know low to orchestrale its
use with other strategies It is not sufficient to know about strategies, but a reader aust also be able to apply them strategically” (Anderson, 1991:19)
Similarly, Kern (1989) states thal there are good and bad uses of the same stralegy,
and that the difference between a “g00d” use and a “bad” use of the same strategy is
in the context in which they are used, how they are used and how they inleract with
other stratogics In other words, the differences are how the strategics are
“operationalized”
The group of researchers: Shohrch Raflari, Keivan Seyyedi, and Shaik Abdnl
Malik Mohamed Ismail Hamp (2012:29) also bring back useful result from systemizing studies on reading strategies, Investigating a wide variety of the training and using strategies by both native and non-native language readers around the world, the authors classify them into 10 categories:
A successful and unsuccessful readers’ strategies
B reatling strategy mstruction oulcomes
C factors affecting the use of reading strategies
D reading strategies of natives and L2/FL readers of the same language
FE reading strategy use and reading comprehension
18
Trang 28F reading strategics of FL readers and L2 readers
G reading strategies while reading in the first language vs reading in L2/'L
HL frequency of stralogy usc and readers’ preferences
1 which strategies suit which readers
J using the first language while reading FL/ SL
The authors draw to the must imporlan! conclusions:
“First, successful readers use reading strategies more actively and make use of a greater variety of strategies and
Second, explicit reading slralegy instruction is always useful: though, ils
‘usefulness varies according to different factors such as the teaching methods and the
learners’ personal variables.”
Tu Viotnam, there are a huge number of studies on reading stralegies in different
areas and aspects by both lecturers, and professors at universities or MA students
Recently, two authors Nguyen Thanh Duc and Trinh Hong Tinh has investigated
the three most irequently used cognilive-netacognilive stralegies in reading process
xesponded by 196 Can ‘Tho Unitversity Hnglish-majored students through the questionnaire The authors discover the level of frequent use of the reading
strategics From the results, the authors suggest the applying meta-cognitive
strategies in reading so that they can improve their abilities and become successful
language learners
in addition, the major of MA students’ studies focus on difficulties or the use of
strategies in learning and teaching in reading classes For example
- A study on difficulties in reading English for Electrical and Electronic
Engineering at Vinh Technical ‘Yeachers’ trainmg university by Pham Hai
Yén(2008)
- Difficulties im teaching reading comprehension with the new Fnglish “Tieng Anh
10” (the set of standard textbooks to the 10th form students )at Ke Sat Lligh School
by Va Thi Thu Ha(2010)
There are also studies investigating the effect of training stralogies like:
Trang 29- Improving students’ reading comprehension through predicting strategy
instruction: an action research at Cao Ba Quat Upper Secondary School by Hoang Thi Kitn Que(2011)
However, a few of people have done research on the effect of the integrating a number of strategies to train students at high school Moreover, in most of the
studies mertioned above, the aulhors just used questionaires and imlerviows for
teachers and students a3 a means of data collection Not many of them conducted
the quasi-experiment which is said to be helpfil to get more accurate and
trustworlly information,
1.4.5.3 Research on four strategies: skimming, scanning, guessing vocabulary
in the context and inference
1.4.5.3.1, Four strategies: skimming, scanning, guessing vocabulary in context
and inference
Skimming
According to Nulall (1996), “whon skimming, we go through the reading
material quickly in order to get the gist of it, to know how it is organized, or to get
an idea of the Lone or the intention of the writer.” Nutall (1996) states that skimming
is the ‘process of rapid glancimg through a text cither to search for a specitic pices
of information (a name, a date) or to get an initial impression of whether the text is
suilable for a given purpose’ (p 49) Likewise, Brown (2001: 308) adds “Skimming
gives readers the advantage of being able to predict the purpose of the reading text, the main topic, or message, and possibly some of the developing or supporting ideas.” In summary, skimming is important for speedy reading to know the purpose, the topic, organization of the text, readers read for general sense but not for the meaning of every word or detail
Scanning
Grellet (1981) considers scanning as the way of “quickly going through a text to find a particular piece of information” Having the same ideas, Williams (1984:100), stales thal “Scamming oceurs when a reader goos Unrough a loxt very
20
Trang 30quickly in order to find a particular point of information.” He also indicates the cases in which scanning may be performed “indexes, dictionaries, maps,
adverlisomenis, labels, reference material, ” Roth scanning and skimming are helpful to read quickly but they are different in some ways When scanning, we
“only try to locate specific information and often we do not even follow the linearity of the passage to do so We simply let our eyes wander over the texl umiil
we find what we are looking for, whether it is a name, a date, or a less specific piece
of information.” Grellet (1981: 19)
Guessing the words [rom the context
Aldelson (1999) emphasizes the role of vocabulary in reading process Lle reports many results from other researchers “Lack of adequate vocabulary as one of the
obstacles to lexL comprehension” (Levine and Reves, 1990, p.37) Grable (1991)
stresses the important role of vocabulary as a predictor of overall reading ability
‘More specifically, how to leam is discussed by Nation (1990) and Alderson (1999) Nation (1990-1) emphasizes “a systematic and principled approach to vocabulary by
both the teacher and the leamer” and instructions are “effective” when the teacher
“makes informed decisions” about how to leach vocabulary He also suggests his
own way of teaching vocabulary in reading “basic vocabulary should be explicitly
taught and L2 reader should be taught to use context to effectively guess the ameanings of less frequent vocabulary.” Anderson (1999) cites 5 steps to guess the
words proposed by Clark and Nation (cited in Nation, 1990 162-63)
“Step 1: Look at the unknown word and decide its part of speech Is it a noun, a verb, an adjective, ar an adverb?
Step 2: Look at the clause or sentence containing the unknown word if the
unknown word is a nowt, what adjectives describe it? What verb is it near? That is, what does this noun do, and what is done Lo i? Tf the unknown word is a verb, what
nouns does if go with? Is it modified by an adverb? If it is an adjective, what noun does it go with? If it is an adverb, what verb is it modifying?”
21
Trang 31Stop 3: Look at the relationship between the clause or scntence containing the unknown word and other sentences or sentence containing the unknown word and other sentences or paragraphs Sometimes this relationship will be signaled by a conjunction like “but”, “because”, “if”, “when”, or by an adverb like “however” or
“as a result” Often there will be no signal The possible types of relationship
alion, and
include cause and clfect, contrast, imclusion, time, exemplifi
summary Punctuation may also serve as a clue Semicolons often signal a list of inclusion relationships; dashes may signal restatement Reference wards like “this”,
“that” and “such” alsa useful information
Step 4: Use the knowledge you have gained from Steps 1-3 to guess the meaning of
the word
Stop 5: Check that your guess is correet
a See that the part of speech of your guess is the same as the part of speech of the unknown ward If it is not the same, then something is wrong with your guess
b Replace the unknown word with your guess If the sentence makes sense, your
guess is probably correct
c Break the unknown word into its prefix, rool, sullix, if possible, If the meanings
of the prefix and roct correspond to your guess, good If not, lock at your gucss
again, but do not change anything if you feel reasonably certain about your guess
using the vontex
d Using the dictionary could be (an additional) way of checking
Alderson also highlights the crucial role of perceiving the meaning of prefixes, suffixes, and roots This is considered as a “strategy to guessing the meaning of unfamiliar vocabulary.” (p.27)
Aebersold (1997) asserts that “Guessing the meaning of a word from the other
words around if, the context, is perhaps the most useful vocabntary skill that readers
can have ‘Ihe ability to use the words and information around an unknown word in
order to guess, or infer, what that word means in a general sense will serve students well in almost every reading siluulion.” (p.142) He considers vocabulary in pre-,
Trang 32during- and post- reading In addition, he claimed that the number of unknown words in a text depends the level of language proficiency and the role of the teacher
is “lo have knowledge of stralogics available lo readers [or use during reading, and
they need to promote the understanding and use of these strategies in the L2/L reading classroom”
Inference
Inference is a difficult strategy that “causes discouragement and apprehension
in students when they are faced with a new text” Gellet (1981:14) Ile adds
“inferring means making use of syntactic, logical and cultural clues to discover the
meaning of unknown elements If these are words, then word-form and derivation
will also play an important part.” To cope with inferring of unknown elements,
readers need to understand relations wilhin the sentence and linking sentences and
ideas
Nuttall (1996) considers the inference of meaning from context as a “powerful
aid lo comprehension” In addition, il is interesting for students lo Jean beeause it
arouses “intelligence” Although if “challenges” readers’ knowledge, it still can be
understood because the readers do not need to “fully understand” (1.72) To deal
with the difficulties, readers need “schemata” whieh is the knowledge about the
world used to guess Le points out some items that related to the inference of
meaning from context such as clucs and lexical density “TT the context, does not
offer enough clues, it is unproductive, inference is impossible” or if the sentence
need inferring contains other new words, it is difficult to make inference because of
increasing “uncertainty” Nuttall also generalizes inference in the broader meaning, not only being used to get the meaning of the words when he said that “inference can often be used to reconstruct the writer’s unstated presuppositions It can also be
used for a different, purpose: when the writer sxpecls the reader to draw certain
unstated conclusions from facts, points in an argument, etc in this case, the reader has all the evidence required, but is expected to take the final steps himself In practice the division between these uses of inference is nol always elear.” (p.114)
Trang 33Inference is considered “an essential skill, but a tricky one because often it is not
clear how much the writer expects us to infer” (p.115)
1.4.5.3.2 Research on skimming, scanning, inference and guessing word
meaning from the context
Many researchers conduct a variety of reading strategies that are related to 4
straicgics and find out the resulis representing their own setlings or comiloxts
However, in the scope of this study, the author only mentions some studies in recent years First, in one study, Flora Debora Moris Marsha (2009) shows the specific
results of wrong answers from students To skimming, 42, 5 % of respondents’ Lotal answers was incorrect lor inference, there were 70 % of the wrong answers lie
concludes that vocatulary skill is the third most difficult reading skill for these
respondents Fnference from ventext skill is also one of imporlant word atlack skilk
and few of the respondents are successful in guessing word meanings from the context However, when scanning, the students do not have trouble like other skills
because il might (hey Have been taught lo use it in all reading classes
Jn terms of each strategy, first, inference, Plulips (1987:17) discovers that reading
proficiency “may compensate im instances where there is insufficient background knowledge, however, whether one had sufficient background knowledge or not
makes little difference in overall performance when the level of reading proficiency
is low” Another interesting point is hat “adull readers have a greater breadth and
depth of understanding of reading comprehension than do the young reader” This is the results of many years of reading, and the problem for educators is to find out
which strategies to teach younger learners In another study, Attaprechakul (2013)
lists some factors related to inference such as “Explicit Main Idea, Lexicon, Syntax,
Summary of the Section, Discourse, Style and Tone, Implicit Main Idea” Ile
believes thal to promote efficienl reading needs inference strategies He
recommends Linguistic ability, Automatic Processing of Text, the Reader’ Prior
Knowledge as well as Training in use of strategies as factors to solve the problem
24
Trang 34The same conclusion from both studies is that the training of inference strategy is
necessary
Another study on “How 1o improve Sixth Grader’s Reading compretonsion
through the Skimming techniques” by a group of authors: Sandra Calderon
Agudelo, Ligia Milena Carvajal Avila, Anna Yamile Guerrero Lopez (2007),
explores different inloresting aspeols and give some uselul implicalion They
discover that their students liked this technique and found it easy and understandable They could understand the whole meaning of the key words or the
tex in an effective way In addition, 75% of students said that the activity was
“excellent”, Skimming led them to “become proficient readers.” (p 31)
As far as guessing vocabulary is cancemed, in a study on “Guessing the Meaning
of Words From conlext’ How and why”, the aulhor Cagin Tugrul Mart (2012)
comes to conclusion that vocabulary plays an important role in helping students
read fluently, so it must be paid attention, but “New words presented in isolation are
hard lo learn but words in conlex( help earners to deduce meamng from context and
leamers see how new words are used grammatically in a sentence.” Other authors
such as Ahmad Ayman Mokhtar and Rafival) Mohd Rawian (2072) show the
limutations of guessing words in context First, guessing vocabulary is usctul for
reading but students need practicing vocabulary to enhance their knowledge In
addition, if a text contains loo many unknown words, hey become frustrated
Therefore, they claim that reading develops vocabulary but it “must be
accompanied with exercises or activities that focus student attention on the
'words "(p 402)
Trang 35CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGY
2.1, Setting of the study
Students
Students grade 11 at Bmh Xuyen high school participated in this study There
were 10 classes with 30 students, 2 classes of which included Lnglish majors
Students in these two classes would take a university entrance exam Therefore,
their English program was also different from the others, ‘They had 5 periods per week for studying Lnglish while the others only studied in 3 periods They started
English from the first sermesler al grade 10 and would finish the sixth one al grade
12 at Binh Xuyen high school, Students worked with only textbook in 3 periods, and 2 periods with materials provided by the teacher in optional lessons Hach
period comprised 45 minutes
‘Textbook and Materials:
Students worked with English 11 based on the new national curriculum and
approach (Jearner-cenlered and cormmunicative approach wilh task-based teaching)
In the textbook, there are 16 units with diverse topics related to 6 topics: You and
me, Fducalion, Communily, Nature, Recreation, and People and Places 5 sections
were included in a unit: Reading, Speaking, Listening, Writing and Language
Voous Because they were Linglish majors, they were assigned extra exercises,
dilTerently designed lessor plan to practise The aim of the textbook was lo provide
iowledge and necessary skills of a foreign language speaker
The study were conducted from when the participants were in the second semester when they already had had knowledge about basic structures as well as vocabulary
in textbook of grade 10 and 11 ‘Therefore, the author found that it matched with the
abjectives of the learning program and students’ levels of proficiency
26
Trang 36Facilities
‘The school was equipped with a library and a multimedia room for leaming
Faglish However, English materials in (he Hbrary were limited There were only
English books for exams, not for extensive reading
‘Teachers:
There were 8 teachers of English leaching in 30 classes at Binh Xuyen high
school, ‘Iwo of them weve at the age of above 30 years old, the rest were under this age All of them had studied English as their major at pedagogical universities
2.2 Restatement of research questions
‘Two questions are above-mentioned in the introduction
1 To what extent does the training of four reading strategies (skimming, scanning,
inference, and guessing new words in conlext) affect grade 11 Fryrlish majors’
reading leaming at Binh Xuyen high school?
2 How can students’ abilities in reading be improved via four reading strategies?
2.3 Research methods
2.3.1 Type of method
Why is quasi-experimental research used?
The rescarcher chose it because of some reasons Furst, it could “explore the
strength of the relationships between variables” and “an appropriate way of
gathering: data” Nunan (1992:25) The second reason was that the sludy was suitable
to the characteristics of the experimental research ‘There are three designs in the experimental method: true -experimental, quasi-experimental and pre-experimental The differences are the designs of control group According to Nunan (1992-41), the
pre-experiment “may have pre- aud posttreatment tests, but lacks a control group
The quasi-experiment “has both pre-and posttests and experimental and control
groups, but na random ignment of subjecis” The irue- experiment “has both pre and posttests, experimental and control groups, and random assignment of subjects.” The subjects of the study had already been assigned before the treatment
Tn addition, the number of students in wo classes was nol changed or moved, sa il
27
Trang 37contributed to the increase in the external validity Extrancous variables were also
controlled prior to the experiment such as the gender, the group size, the age, and
‘Rnglish proficieney The scarcher saved a lot of time in managing the groups
Finally, all the participants were Vietnamese of the same age They lived all over areas around Binh Muyen high school, so they were said to be at the same level of sovial and cultural background Moreover, their Friglish proficiency was the same according to their scores in the placement test they had done With above
mentioned rationale the quasi-experimental research was suitable, and feasible to be chosen
Variables:
Independent variable: Four strategies
Tn this study, the Control group learned with traditional activitios in reading provided by the teacher in a reading lesson Meanwhile the Experimental group was explained four strategies and supplied materials to practise reading exercises The
independent was considered to be the cause of changes in the values of the
dependent variable
Dependent variable: Students’ scores in reaching
The students’ reading comprehension proficiency was reflected im the reading,
comprehension test administered in both pretest and posttest
Tnlervening vanbles such as learners’ age, gender, personality, prior knowledge, motivation and attitudes, belief and leaming strategies, leamer language proficiency, society and education, and teacher might appear Ilowever, it was assumed that these factors randomly distributed in both groups and the influences
on the data seemed to be equal
2.3.2 Population sampling
This research was conducted with 60 students major of Enghsh in two ol:
‘There were 40 females and 20 males ‘They were studying the second term of the
Trang 38choosing students at grade 11 First, as these students were the ones who I had been directly teaching, so | could have favorable conditions to carry out all the steps of the research process Second, they had experienced 1 year al Birk Xuyen high school and they had some proficiency in English at high school
Table 1: Background information about the subject of the study
Third, regarding English background, all subjects had studied English for 4 years
in lower-secondary school before upper-secondary school Although they had one year with Linglish at upper-second or high school and all of them planned to take university entrance and final exam, they were reported to face with lots of
difficulties in reading skill The results of testa at the previous grade were
discouraging and which were often complained by the teacher Many students got
bad marks: English reading skill scores were estimated to be low
Tn this study, the subjects were divided into 2 groups: class 11A10 (the
experimental group, N= 30) and the control group (N=30) Both groups took the
pre-and post- reading comprehension tests The experimental group received a S-
weck reading strategics training course while the control group received regular seading training
2.3.3 Data collection instruments
In this study, the author uses pretest and post test to investigate the effect of 4
strategies taught
Only one test is uscd for both pretest and posttest The ralionale for using the same
test as suggested by Song, (1998) was:
Trang 391 Tt assured the exact comparable test and helped avoid the problem of equating
different forms of pretest and posttest
2 Students were not given answer keys afler doing the lest, so even if they
remembered how they had answered the first time they did not know whether their
answers were correct or not
3 Any ellects duc lo the tes! would be compared between the two groups
4, It ensures test reliability
The values of the dependent variable were measured by scores of both Control
and Experimenial groups in pre and postlesl The lesl scores were calculated and
compared by a t-test after the treatment
The test was based on standardized tests of TOEFL (Milada Broukal (2004)
Pelerson’s 2002 TORFL Flash Reading NXB Tré) which was adapted (rom TORFT
Test Assistant Before the test, the researcher consulted a group of teachers with
many years teaching English to identify the level that is suitable to the students
Thore were SO mulliple-choice questions in the test focusing on four stralogics
tested: skimming, scanning, inference and vocabulary Hach text contains the
number of words that salisfted wilh the requirement for the level of students according to the national curriculum (230-270 words for students at grade 11}, There
was 7 inference questions and 5 skimming questions (main ideas / topic); 17
scanning questions and 21 vocabulary questions Rach correcl answer gained by
students was mark 0, 2 The time allowance for each test was 55 munutes
2.3.4, Data analysis techniques
The teacher delivered instructions while training 4 strategies and observed the
students’ behaviors
For the statistical analyses of the data obiained, the Statistical Package for Social
Science (SPSS) was used T-test were used to compare mean scores of readin, comprehension between the two groups and within each group itself at the
‘beginning, and end of the study
30