1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Luận văn an action research on teaching grammar in the light of the eclectic approach with first year non english major students at electric power university

47 3 0
Tài liệu được quét OCR, nội dung có thể không chính xác
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề An Action Research on Teaching Grammar in the Light of the Eclectic Approach with First-Year Non-English Major Students at Electric Power University
Tác giả Vu Th] Hong Thu
Người hướng dẫn Haàng Tất Trường, M.A.
Trường học Vietnam National University, Hanoi College of Foreign Languages
Chuyên ngành English Methodology
Thể loại M.A. Minor Thesis
Năm xuất bản 2009
Thành phố Hanoi
Định dạng
Số trang 47
Dung lượng 509,16 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

urged me to find the answers to a lot of questions: “How can teachers help students te leam effectively grammar, which is not only regarded important in learning English, but also consi

Trang 1

VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOL COLLEGE OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES DEPARTMENT OF POST-GRADUATE STUDIES

VU TH] HONG THU

AN ACTION RESKARCI ON TEACIIEXG GRAMMAR IN THE LIGIT OF THE

ECLECTIC APPROACH WITH FIRST-YEAR NON-ENGLISH MAJOR

STUDENTS AT ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY

(NGHIÊN CỨU VIỆC DẠY NGỮ PHÁP THEO ĐƯỜNG HƯỚNG CHIÉT TRUNG CHO SINH VIÊN KHÔNG CHUYEN TIENG ANH NĂM THỨ NHÁT TẠI

TRƯỜNG DẠTHỌC ĐIỆN LỰC)

M.A MINOR THESIS

Trang 2

VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOL COLLEGE OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES DEPARTMENT OF POST-GRADUATE STUDIES

VU TH] HONG THU

AN ACTION RESKARCI GN TEACIIING GRAMMAR IN THLE LIGITE OF THLE

ECLECTIC APPROACH WITH FIRST-YEAR NON-ENGLISH MAJOR

STUDENTS AT ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY

(NGHIÊN CỨU VIỆC DẠY NGỮ PHÁP THEO ĐƯỜNG HƯỚNG CHIÉT TRUNG CHO SINH VIÊN KHÔNG CHUYEN TIENG ANH NĂM THỨ NHÁT TẠI

TRƯỜNG DẠTHỌC ĐIỆN LỰC)

M.A MINOR THESIS

Trang 3

L2.Aims of the study

L3 Scope of the study TH HH "— setae

14 The rescarch questions

LS Methods of the study

L6 Design of the study

PARTTHL DEVELOPMENT eo eriiroee

Chapfer1: Liferafure review

1.1 Gmmnnar and its status in language leaching

Trang 4

1.1.2 The status of grammar in English language teaching (ELT)

1.1.3 What needs to be tanght? ssenenmoninninnenenmisnenseaneee

1.1.4 Stages in teaching grammar

1.2 Different views on grammar teaching

1.2.1 The ‘lraditional Xiethod: Grammar- 'Iranslation

`

1.2.3 The Communicative Language ‘Teaching (CLI)

1.2.3.1 Characteristics 12.3.2 The role of the teacher and students in a Communicative class

12.3.3 The CLT and Teaching Grammar

12.3.4 the CLI and Teaching English Grammar ‘Teaching at EPU

1.2.4 Ticlectic Approach

1.2.5 Summary

Chapter 2: The study

2.1 Design and mathodotogy

2.1.1 Subjects of the study

Trang 5

2.2.2 The eurent silmntion of teaching and learning grammar at first- your

2.2.3 Students’ wanls about Jeaming grammar

Chapter 3: Teaching grammar in the light of Eclectic Approach: Techniques

and Procedure

3.1, Some considerations

3.2 Six-step procedure of a grammar lesson in the light of Eclectic Approach

3.2.1, Slep 1: Setting the context

3.2.2, Step 2: Identification of the Grammar Point

a Using songs and verses

b Using garnes and problem-solving activilics

Trang 6

Part II: Conclusion

Trang 7

PART I: INTRODUCTION

L1 RATIONALE

It is a fact that English has become more and more popular and vital in Vietnam in

recent decades There have becn more and more people rushing to study English in

language centers in the last few years because they hold a belief that English helps them be more exposed Lo betler job opporlunilies In addition, in correspondence to this trend, in

almost all of schools, colleges and universities, English has become a compulsory subject Electric Power University (EPL), where { have been working for 6 years, is not an

exception

With 6 years of experience in teaching English for the first-ycar siudents at this

university, I find that grammar teaching and learning plays an unportant role at EPU as it

supplies students with basic knowledge to prepare for the final exams and ESP course in

the second year Therefore, it is understandable that most of the students at my university

think grammar, of course, is very important However, many of the students, especially from manniainons and remote areas, have never leamt English before or they leam other

forcign languages at sccondary school Meanwhile, some students’ English arc at

proficient level As a matter of fact, nrultilevel classes are curently popular in many

universities in general and at HPU in particular, which causes many difficulties to teachers and students in language teaching Another problem can be mentioned here is the large

munber of students in each class: about 80-90 students The textbook for the first-year

students at EPU is Mew Headway Elementary and continues to Unit 9 of New Leadway

Pre-Intermediate Although the book provides thorough granmmar and voeabulary and alt

four language skills, most of the teachers spend quite a lot of time on grammar points

Most of the grammar lessons are carried ont in traditional methods, that is, the teacher

presents new grammar verbally, and then students do, tm by turn, exercises in the

workbooks However, I mysclf realize that it docs not reveal sufficient through the term-

end examinations More than 50% of the students get the English marks below average and

they have to retake the examination or retake the English course This rnaller of fact has

urged me to find the answers to a lot of questions: “How can teachers help students te leam

effectively grammar, which is not only regarded important in learning English, but also considered difficult and boring by students?” “What should we do to encourage students ta

sindy irr such conditions?” “What are the purposes of students when studying grararer?”

Trang 8

“Which methods of teaching can satisfy students” ne

is?” “Is the use of Vietnamese

necessary in teaching English gramenar?” “Can grammar be tanghl commusticalively?” Tt is these problems that have served as the starting point for our study to find out a suitable

method to teach grammar to the first-year students at EPU

1.2 AIMS OF THE STTDY

My study is an attempt to

- Identify the attitudes of teachers and students in teaching and learning

grammar

- Identify the current situation of teaching and leaming English Grammar

to first-year students al EPL

- Identify thơ wanls of sIndenls about the methods of teaching, domg

grammar exercises, and correcting mistakes

- Suggest an applicable and effective method of teaching grammar to the

first-year students at EPU

1.3 SCOPE OF THE STUDY

‘The scope of this study is limited to an applicable method of teaching grammar to the first-year students al, PU, based on the findings of my thesis and with the assumption that the questionnaires were answered sincerely by the teachers and students chosen for our thesis

Tis expected that this methad of teaching grammar is applicable not only to the first-year students at EPU but also to students of other universities and colleges in Vietnam, sharing the same situations and conditions of learning

1.4 THE RESEARCH QUESTIONS

My study is aimed to answer the following research questions:

- What are the attitudes of teachers and students in teaching and learning

gian?

- What is the current situation of teaching and learning English Grammar to

first-year students at EPLF?

- What aro thờ wanis dÍ sluđenls about the methods of teaching, doing

grammar exercises, and correcting mistakes?

- 'What is an applicable and effsotive method of teaching grammar to the

first-year students at FPU?

Trang 9

LS METHODS OF THE STUDY

To sealize the aims of the study, in order to get the answer to the above research questions, I design a mini-action research, That is, I design four grammar lessons in the light of eclectic approach and I myself will act as an observer in each class Also after cach lesson, I hand oul a student evaluation shect fo the students to have their sctf- evaluation of their interest, involvement and their grasp of grammar knowledge after lessons The responses were then analyzed by means of descriptive statistics

Survey questionnaires arc also uscd to collcet information and evidence for the study The data collected for the study will come from 2 sources: 80 fixst-year students at

EPU and 15 leachers who are Lz:

ching English lo firsl-year slutenis al EPI:

All comments, remarks, recommendations and conclusion provided in the study will be based on the data analysis

T.6 DESIGN OF THE STUDY

This study is going to be divided into 3 parts as follows:

Part I, INDRODUCTION, deals with the reason for the research and the aims, scope and methodology of the study The research questions are also raised in this put

Part I, DEVELOPMENT, consists of 3 following chapters:

- Chapter I is intended to give some theoretical background related to:

definitions of grammar, different views on grammar teaching, teaching grammar in the light of eclectic approach

: Chapter II aims to describe background information about the current

teaching and learning of grammar at EPU and present the methodology underlying the research including data collection instruments, procedures

A detailed data analysis and discussions arc also given

- Chapter III focuses on TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES OF A

GRAMMAR LESSON which is taught in the light of eclectic approach Part 111, CONCLUSION addresses the key issues in the study, summatizing some

shortcomings revealed during the process of completing this rescarch paper.

Trang 10

PART IT: DEVELOPMENT CITAPTER1: LITERATURE REVIEW

1.1 GRAMMAR AND ITS STATUS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING

1.4.1 Definition of grammar

There have exisicd varions ways of defining grammar - a very common and

familiar term in language teaching and learning

According to Oxford Advanced Learer’s Dictionary (1995:517), grammar is “the

mules in a language for changing ths form of words and combining them wo sentences”

The rules of grammar, as the dictionary suggests, are about how words change and put

together into sentences Far example, the word “win” changes to “won” in the past tense - that is the way in which a word changes in form The adjective “succcssful” is put into the

sentence “She is a woman”, making up “She is a successful woman” — that is the way in

which words are combined into sentences

Similarly, Jeremy Harmer (1988:1) defines grammar as “the way in which words

change themselves and group together to make sentences The grammar of a language is

what happens ta wards when they become plural or negative, or what word order is used when we make questions or join two clauses to make one sentence.” [ts scent thal Jeremy

Harmer shares the same point of view with the authors of the Oxford Advanced Leamer’s

Dictionary

As for Celec, M (1988:16), gramunar is “@ subset of those rules which governs

the configurations that the morphology and syntax of a language assume.”

From Penny Li’s view (1988:4), “Grammar may be roughly defined as the way a

language manipulates and combines words (ar bits of wards) in order to form longer units

of meaning.” In 1996, he makes it clearer “Granunar is a sel of rules that define how

words (or parts of words) are combined or changed to form acceptable units of meaning

within a language” (1996-87)

1.1.2 The status of grammar in English language teaching (ELT)

The position of grammar teaching in ELT is still on controversy Some people

refute the place of grammar teaching for the reason that the study of grammar is neither

necessary nor sufficient for Isarning to usc a language

Meanwhile, some affirm the importance of grammar for effective language

leaming, “The evidence seems ta show bevond doubt that though it is by conmumicative

Trang 11

use in real “speech acts" that the new language “sticks” in the learner's mind, insight into pattern is an equal partner with communicative use in what language teachers now see as

dual process of acquisition/learning Grammer, approached as a vovage of discovery into

the patterns of language rather than the learning of prescriptive rules, is no longer a

bogey word.” (Eric Hawkins, 1984:150-1)

Tn fact, grammar is one of the key components of a language Thus, one carmol

master a language without the knowledge of its grammar Partly thanks to grammar,

language can function as a means of communication, especially in written language A

person cannot writs well if he lacks the knowledge of grammar In speaking, though

sometimes grammatical mistakes are acceptable, grammar makes one’s speech better and qnore attractive, especially in (ormal circumstances Learners carmol uss words umtess they

know how to put these words together Grammar exists to enable us to “mean” and without

grammar, if is impossible to communicate beyond a very rudimentary level because

“speech is na more than sounds, writing is no more than hieroglyphios” (Peck, 1987-127) For this very Teason, the Leaching of grammar is quite imporlant in ELT

1.1.3 What needs to be taught?

“What needs fo be taught” is also a controversy surrounding the teaching of

grammar Some people are concemed foremost about the explanation of grammatical rules

with all of the grammatical terminology necessary for this task For others, the teaching of

grammar means the practice of common grammatical patterns Far still others, providing

learners wih opportunity in a variely of realistic sitwalions in ordsr to leam to

communicate effectively is put on top priority

Sandra L.Me Kay (1987 XIV) claims “Uf we want our students to learn these

things and to use Rnglish both correctly and anpropriately, we need to include in our

grammar classes attention to hoth form and function” Here, “form” means grammatical

forms such as verb tense and question formation, ete whereas “function” refers to the

purpose that language serves like asking for direction, making and responding to a

suggestion, showing agrecinient or disagrcement, cle

Sharing the same view as Sandra L.Mc Kay, Penny Ur (1988:6) affirms "Some

teachers, andior the course books they use, have a tendency to concentrate on some of these and negleci others: they may spend a lot of time on geiting the forms right and

neglect lo give practive in using the siructare to convey meanings, or they may focus on

Trang 12

written exercises and fail to caver the oral aspects satisfactorily It is important ta keep a balance, taking into account, of course, the needs of the particular class being taught.”

Also, Adnan Doff (1988-33) suggests that when presenting a structure, it is vital to:

- “show what the structure means and how it is used, by giving examples

- show clearly how the structure is formed, so that students can use it to make sentences of their own"

Obviously, according to Adrian Doff, teachers should teach the meaning, the form

of the grammatical structure as well as how it is used

1.1.4 Stages in teaching grammar

According to Celee, M

presentation, focused practice, communicative practice and teacher feedback and

(1988), a grammar lesson has 4 stages namely

correction in order, In the first stage, the grammar structure is introduced The purpose of

the second one is “ter allow the learner tv gam control af the form withoul the added

pressure and distraction of trying to use the form for communication.” (1988:27) In phase

3, the Icarner practices the suclure communicatively Teacher feedback and correction, although regarded as a final stage, is carried out throughout the lesson and the strategies

for this step require flexibility in correspondence to the phase of the lesson

1.2 DIFFERENT VIEWS ON GRAMMAR TEACHING

Depending on different lingusstic schools, there have been different approaches and methods of teaching and learning English Rach method has ils own strengths as well as ils

lumitations Here I will mention some methods of teaching-learning English and English

grammar as Inowledge for our study

1.2.1 Lhe Traditional Method: Grammar - Translation

This method tus widely heen applied in teaching-leaming foreign languages all over the world for a long time, and it is now widely used in teaching English by Vietnamese teachers in high schools English centers and even in colleges and universities The goal of this method is lo help sludents be able to read lileralure wrilien in the targel language To do this, students need to leam the grammar rules and vocabulary of the target language

1.2.1.1 Character

ics Although having, some variations, this method has the following cha.actetistics

= Classes are taught in the mother Longne, with Titile active use of the largel language

Trang 13

— Much vocabulary is tmaght in the form of list of isolated words with cquivalent in mother tongue

Teachers explain grammar rules, with examples

— Grammar provides the rules for putting words together, and instruction often focuses on the form and inflection of words

— Reading of difficult texts is begun carly

granunatical analysis

— Often the only drills are exercises in translating disconnected sentences from the target language into the mother tongue

Lille o no atiention is given to pronunciation

(Prator and Celce-Mureia, 1979:3)

With this method, grammar is important for readings and writing skills which are considered as primary skills in leaming a foreign language Grammar is leaned deductively ‘The teacher gives prammar nes, explains, illustrates with examples Students memorize the rules, then apply them to wrilicn excrci

Tho emphasis is heavily placed

on having students having students got the correct answer If studenls make orrars or do not know an answer, the teacher supplies them with the correct answer Most interaction is

one way: teacher-to-students Student-initiated interaction and student-student interaction

is minimel, (Larson-Frecman, 1986)

1.2.1.2 The Grammar-Translation Method and English Grammar Teaching at EPU

Although the Grammar-Translation Method is not popularly used any more in many countries in the world, it is still vary popular in Victnam, especially in teaching

grammar My university is net an exception Most teachers have ever used this method in

many grammar lessons ‘There are some reasons to support this choice: Students at my universitics are not majoring in English, Therefore, they can not understand the lesson if the teacher uses English all the time There are very few students at the proficiency level who can understand but thus leads to most students” difficulty in catching up and the teacher has to repsal the explanation many: tin

As a result, the pace of teaching is slowed down and the teacher can not cover the materials as planned Moreover, the conditions of learning at my University are very poor while the number of students is usually greal, so the Granmmar-Translation mmethad seems lo be a good method

Trang 14

However, in my opinion, though Grammar-Translation Method offers several favorable points for forcign language teaching, especially grammus, in the real conditions and situations of leaning, at my university, I do not think it is a good and effective method because first of all, it does not satisfy my students’ purpose of English leaming, which is to use English for communication, Of caursc, the Grammar-Transtafion method can help students understand and tcmorize a lol of grammar rules, bul knowing # lot of vocabulary and grammar rules does not mean that the learners can automatically use the target language for communication To be able to use the leamed grammar rules for communication, students must be offercd opportunitics 40 practice thom, and the first suitable place for this practice is the classroom itself, Another point is the classroom atmosphere, The atmosphere of a traditional melhod class is too passive and boring for my students, As a teacher of English, I always think of another suitable method to teach

— New material is presented in dialog form,

There is dependence on mimicry, memorization of set phrases, and over leaming

— Structures arc sequenced by means of contrastive analysis and taught onc at a time

= Structural patterns are taught using repetitive dbitts,

— There is little or no grammatical explanation Grammar is taught by inductive analogy rather deductive explanation

= Vouahutary is stricity lirsited and learned in context

— There is much use of tapes, language labs and visual aids

— Great attention is attached to pronunciation

Very little use of the mother tongue by teachers is permitted

Suecesstid responses are immediately reinforced,

— There is a greal effort to gel students to produce error-free uftcrances

— There is a tendency to manipulate language and disregard content

Trang 15

It is in this method grammer is taught inductively, induced from models presented

in dialogs or drills There is almost no explanation of grammar tales Grammar exercises

are practiced through repetitive or substitution drills, and the teachers strives to prevent

students’ mistakes by predicting trouble spots and tightly controlling what they teach

is to say (Larsen-Frecman, 1986)

1.2.2.2 The Audio-TLingual Method and English Grammar Teuching al EPU

In this method, grammar is taught inductively through sentence models, dialogs and drills It is a good way to have students leam grammar of a foreign language by repeating

over and over again diẾftrent sHueturcs, senlencc patzrms so that they gct uscd to structures that are different from those of their mother tongue and thus acquire grammar subconsciously and use them aulomalically as the nalive spsakers do

However, my students does not major in English, the English proficiency levels of

my students is low ‘('herefore, they can not understand the grammar points including complicated structures if the teacher speaks linglish all the time, and consequently they can nol use ther for communication Morcover, the lack of learning conditions and ficilitics required also contuibutes to the fact that teachers at EPU rarely use this method in teaching English in general and in teaching grammar in particular

1.2.3 The Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)

This is an approach aiming at providing Jeamers with conununicative competence Communicative competence is the ability of using the language appropriate to a given social cantexL In the words of Brown (1994:227), communicative competence “enables us

to convey and interpret messages and to negotiate meanings interpersonally within specific contexts.”

Contextualization is a basie premise

Language functions are emphasized over forms

Trang 16

10

— Any device thal helps the learners is accepted

— Use of nalive language is accepted when nec

vy

— ‘Translation may be used where students need or benefit from it

— ‘Teachers help learners in any way that motivates them to work with the language

— Fluency and acceptable language is the primary goal

Students are expected to interact with other people in pair and group work ar in their writings

1.2.3.2 The role of the teacher and students in a Cammunicative class

In a communicative class, the role of the teacher and students is quite different from that in other methods of teaching and leaming: ‘The students are of primary imporlance and the teacher plays a secondary role

The students must take the initiative step in learning process It is the individual leamer himself who decides what, when and how he studies and determines the outcomes

by and for himsel) He should bo aetive and responsible in collaborating with the Ioacher lo organize, to plan the learning programs in which his own needs and interests are taken into account He shares with the teacher authority and responsibility in selecting, materials, methods, and techniques of learning Ite should also have collaborating relationships with his classmates rather than competitive, should participale actively and couperalively in class activities to make leaning effective not only for himself but also to others (Knowles,

197

) This, however, does not mean that the teacher is not necessary for the class Ilis role

is still important though secondary

In communicative language teaching and learning, there must always be a two-way

interaction between the teacher and students, and students and students The teacher is no

longer an authoritarian person who dictates Gom the platforin whal students should do, bul

a facilitator, a mediator in a group-dynamic situation, an advisor, an organizes He is there

to help students lear better by establishing a conductive climate for learning with an open, respeelful, democratic, and couperative atmosphere He helps lo build relationships of

mutual trust and helpfulness among students by encouraging cooperative activities and refraining from inducing competitiveness (Knowles, 1973) In communicative activities,

the

wher docs nol inlervens right aller initiating the activilics He should move around the classroom in order to monitor students and give them stimuli and experience when needed If he wants to join in the communicative activities, he should be co-commmunicator.

Trang 17

11

‘The teacher should allow students to be independent in their activities In short, the teachor's tole is tbal of a helper, a facilitator, and an organizer, nut a dictalor

1.2.3.3 The CLT and Teaching Grammar

Although the CLY focuses more on fimetions than forms, grammar is still

— Grammatical explanation must be brief and simple

— he teacher can use the mother tongue if necessary

The illustrating examples must be clear and unambiguous

The teacher should use teaching aids whenever possible to graphically depict grammatical relationships, such as charts, graphs, objects, maps, drawings efc

(Brown, 1994: 349-353)

1.2.3.4 The CLT and Teaching Engfish Grammar Teaching at EPU

The CLT is used widely in Wsaching and learning English in many comlrics nowadays, including, Vietnam because it seems to meet the leamers’ need of using English for communication in real situations In this approach, grammar is taught in context, through different activities Grammar rules are acquired under various functional calegories, and the purpose of leaching and leaming granumar is for communication This

is a good point which meets with students’ needs, that is learning English grammar is not for its own sake but for communication in the real life Moreover, the interactive classroom atmosphere is a good motivation for stedents to Ivan grammar, which is usually considered boring and difficult

Towever, al EPU, almost the leachers apply the traditionat method when Leaching grammar, although they knaw thal if is no tonger an appropriale method because of the following difficulties: The first is the condition of Jeaming In order to make use of different kinds of activities required by CLI’, we need proper classes: the classrooms are large criough and casy lo move uround when carrying ont activilics and the number of

Trang 18

12

students should not be too large, teaching aids are available and so on We do not have the above things al EPU Another problem is the too loaded syllabus at EPU The lextbook American Headway by John and L Soars is designed to be taught in approximately in 120 hours, but at EPU, the first-year students learn the book American Headway Elementary and continus Ip the lesson 9 of American Headway Pre-Intermediate in two terms of 150 poriods (100 hours), That is cach lesson is laught in four haurs in cornparison with eight hours as it is designed, As a result, teachers do not have enough time to have students do different communicative activities using the grammar points they have leaned for communication as well as bring thcir own personal expeticnees and feclings to the Icarning

context One mare problem is of error correction ‘The CLI emphasizes mare on fluency

than accuracy The problem is how and when we should correct the leamers’ errors TC the teacher interrupts students all the time to comect their mistakes, he will spoil the communication and make students too aftaid to contime communicating On the other hand, if he always ignores students” errors, he will reinforce the errors of the speaker — learner and unintentionally helps thon formn a badd habil

1.2.4 electie Approach

According to Rivers (1982), an eclectic approach allows language teachers "to absorb the best techniques of all the well-known language-teaching methods into their classroom procedures, using them for the purposes for which they arc most appropriate” (p 55) This approach is eclectic becanse the assumption about language learning of this approach is not based solely on one theoretical school of thought It is a combination of ditferent methods, including different principles of teaching, using different kinds of tasks

to meet with the complexity of language leamers in multiple worldwide contexts The

s and activities which are tailored for #

eclectic approach indhudes different classroom t

particular group of earners with particular purposes, particular conditions and siluations of leaming

1.2.5 Summary

Each method or approach of teaching has its own strengths and weaknesses There

is no perfect method Onc method may be cffzetive in this situation but not very succcssful

in another depending on different situations, conditions and factors involved ‘The key of success in language teaching and learning is lo chaose the method ar methads that best suit

to particular types of students, leaming conditions, physical facilities, the objectives of the couse, and the students’ needs, interests and levels ‘The effectiveness of education, in fact,

Trang 19

18

does not depend totally on the method itself but on onr choice and application of the stttable method in ant effective way Thus, the duly of a teacher is to solect the most suitable method for his class and subject, combine and modify if necessary to make teaching and learning effective

Trang 20

14

CHAPTER 2: THE STUDY

2.41 DESIGN ANTI METHODOLOGY

2.1.1 Subjeets of the study

‘The subjects of my study consist of two groups ‘he first one consists of 80 first-

year sludents from class D311] al EPU The olher includes 15 teachers of Tnglish who are working at EPU

‘The students are at the age of ftom 20 to 23 Among them, more are male than female (85% compared to 15%), which is likely to be a typical feature of any technical college and university, Their knowledge of English is unequal as they experionce different

‘years of learning English Some of them have just been learning English since they entered the university while some others have been leaming the language for 10 years in the first year, all students arc asked to follow the book American Headway Elementary and continue to the lesson 9 of American Headway Pre-dntermediate in two terms of 150 periods (100 hours) Among this amount of time, 6 periods are for revision and 6 periods arc spent on tests Therefore, they have only 6 potiods to finish a Icsson in the textbook

The teachers in this study are quite young, aged trom 25 (6%) to 42 (6%) As a result, most of them have at least 5 years of experience in teaching English Besides, it sooms thal in the arca of tacking foreign languages, almost are female teachers and teachers of English at EPU is not an exception There is no male teacher of English at

EPL All of teachers at EPU graduated from College of Voreign Languages — Vietnam

¢ leachers, 5 are taster holders, 6 arc taking master

National University, Hanoi Of the

courses at Hanoi National University, College of Foreign Languages Each of the teachers

is to be responsible for from 2 to 3 first-year classes, each of which consists of about about

80 students

2.1.2 The instruments

In order to collect necessary data and information for the study, the author designed and administered two sets of survey questionnaires, one for teachers and the other for sindents, (Sco tha Appondix 1 & 2) The questionnaire for the teachers was designed lo find out the methods they used to teach grammar, their opinions about the purpose of teaching grammar, and their attitudes towards the use of CL in teaching grammar for first-year students, Another questionaire wes given to students to identify their parpo:

in learning grammar, their attitudes towards grammar periods, the way they wish their

Trang 21

15

teachers to use to teach grammar, do and correct grammar exercises to get the best result in learning, There ere 6 quastions displayed in questionnaire for tcachors and 8 quastions for students and they are designed as follows:

£ Question 1 in the questionnaire for teachers and that for students deal with the

Questionnaire is casy to carry oul To take il casicr for the participants, the questions arz

designed as multiple-choice and open-ended Also, clear instructions were given to both

teachers and students before they were asked to do the questionnaires Besides, the participants are not identified, thus, they were willing to tick and write down what they

really thought Moreover, since questionnaire can be applied for a great number of

subjects, the results will be more various and objective if the questions are answered

seriously and sincerely

Apatt from the survey questionnaires for non-English majored students and

teachers, classroom observation was employed to clarify and test the validity of

information A class of 80 first

car sluderds at RPU was taught grammar in the Fghl of Eclectic Approach The class observation was carried out to evaluate whether the teacher would give the lesson successfully: how much if motivates students into the activities, the way sho monitors the class

2.2DATA ANALYSIS

2.2.1 The allitudes of teachers and students al EPU Lowards the pusitiva of grammar

in ELT

The data about the attitudes of teachers and students at EPU towards the position of

grammar in ELT are summarized in the tables below:

Trang 22

1 (How important do you think] 77.5% 17.5% 3% 0% 0%

Table 2: Students’ attitudes towards the position of grammar in ELT

In general, as can be seen from the tables above, despite same differences, almost

all of the teachers and studerls al REPU are aware of the importance of Leaching and

Icarning grammar Maybe it is because students’ tests of English arc often in written form

and mostly on grammar

Remarkably, none of the teachers and students thinks teaching and learning

prammar almost unimportant or unimportant, 60% of teachers feel teaching grammar very

Important in comparison with 77.5% of students have the same opinion Only 6.7% of

teachers and 5% of students choose “neutral” as an answer lo the question about the vital

role of teaching grammar

2.2.2 The current situation of teaching and learning grammar at first- year classes at

EPU

As mentioned above, the current situation of teaching and learning grammar at first-year classes al TIPU is deall with questions 2-6 in the questionnaire for teachers and

questions 2-3 in the questionnaire for students All the collected data about this matter is

presented in the following tables:

Trang 23

Table 3 Data collected from questions 2-3 for teachers

‘Answer Strongly | Agree Neutral | Disagree | Strongly

Ngày đăng: 19/05/2025, 20:58

Nguồn tham khảo

Tài liệu tham khảo Loại Chi tiết
1. Brown, LLD. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Prentice Hall Regents Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Principles of Language Learning and Teaching
Tác giả: Brown, LLD
Nhà XB: Prentice Hall Regents
Năm: 1994
2. Brumfit, C. J. (1983). Communicative Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Communicative Methodology in Language Teaching
Tác giả: C. J. Brumfit
Nhà XB: Cambridge University Press
Năm: 1983
3. Celce-Murcia, M (1988). Techniques and Resources in Teaching Grammar. Oxford University Press Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Techniques and Resources in Teaching Grammar
Tác giả: Celce-Murcia, M
Nhà XB: Oxford University Press
Năm: 1988
4. Celee-Murcia, M. (1980). Group Work with Grammar Teaching. Retrieved 5 April, 2007 from English Teaching Forum (vol.40 (2002), no 1, pp. 42) Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Group Work with Grammar Teaching
Tác giả: Celee-Murcia, M
Năm: 1980
5. Doff, A. (1988), Teach English: A taining course for teachers. Cambridge Univerty Press Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Teach English: A training course for teachers
Tác giả: A. Doff
Nhà XB: Cambridge University Press
Năm: 1988
6. Graham, ©. (1993). Grammar Chants. Oxford University Press Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Grammar Chants
Tác giả: Graham, ©
Nhà XB: Oxford University Press
Năm: 1993
7. Hanmer, J. (1988). Teacking and Learning Grammar. Longman Group UK Limited Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Teacking and Learning Grammar
Tác giả: Hanmer, J
Nhà XB: Longman Group UK Limited
Năm: 1988
8. Hawkins, E. (1984). Awareness of Language: An introduction, Cambridge University Press Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Awareness of Language: An introduction
Tác giả: E. Hawkins
Nhà XB: Cambridge University Press
Năm: 1984
9. Homby, A.S. (1995). Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Oxtord University Press Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary
Tác giả: A.S. Homby
Nhà XB: Oxford University Press
Năm: 1995
12. Larsen-l'reeman, D. (1986) Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford University Pross Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching
Tác giả: D. Larsen-l'reeman
Nhà XB: Oxford University Press
Năm: 1986
13, Larscn-Freeman, D. and MH. Long. (1993) An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. Longman Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research
Tác giả: Larscn-Freeman, D., MH. Long
Nhà XB: Longman
Năm: 1993
16, Peck, A. (1987). Language Teachers at work. Prentice Hall Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Language Teachers at work
Tác giả: Peck, A
Nhà XB: Prentice Hall
Năm: 1987
17. Practor and Celce-Murcia, M (1979). Am outline of Language teaching Approaches. Cambridge University Press Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: An Outline of Language Teaching Approaches
Tác giả: Practor, Celce-Murcia, M
Nhà XB: Cambridge University Press
Năm: 1979
18. Rivers, W. M. (1982). Communicating Naturally in a Second Language. Cambridge University Press Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Communicating Naturally in a Second Language
Tác giả: W. M. Rivers
Nhà XB: Cambridge University Press
Năm: 1982
19. Schcibner, K. (1995). Ready-made English. Heinentann Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Ready-made English
Tác giả: Schcibner, K
Nhà XB: Heinentann
Năm: 1995
20, Ur, P (1988). Grammar Practice Activities. Cambridge University Press Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Grammar Practice Activities
Tác giả: P. Ur
Nhà XB: Cambridge University Press
Năm: 1988
21. Ur, P. (1996)..4 Course in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: A Course in Language Teaching
Tác giả: P. Ur
Nhà XB: Cambridge University Press
Năm: 1996
10. Kay. S (1997). Reward-The Resource Pack. Macmillan Knowles, M. (1973) The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Gull Publishing Company Khác

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm

w