HO CHI MINH CITY UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND EDUCATION FACULTY OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION GRADUATION PROJECT DESIGN A PWM FOR DC-DC BOOST CONVERTERS ON 180nm CMOS LE VAN SY Student
INTRODUCTION
The project's criticality
Researchers are developing green electricity converters to enhance gadget performance, with a focus on DC-DC converters, particularly boost converters These converters are widely used in power electronics systems to increase output voltage relative to input voltage, ensuring a stable power supply for devices.
Traditional boost converters face limitations in voltage, power, and efficiency; however, their straightforward design and compatibility with standard transfer control circuits make them widely used The fundamental operation of a boost converter utilizing PWM offers several advantages, such as straightforward functionality and control Nonetheless, challenges arise in closed-loop applications due to varying current and voltage signals.
Issues related to inefficient output voltage and its dependency on current polarity can arise However, the overall efficiency of power transfer is largely determined by the PWM method used.
This article presents a proposed design for a PWM (Pulse Width Modulation) system utilizing a four-transistor comparator, aimed at enhancing system simplicity and advancing PWM technology in conventional CMOS processes while minimizing power consumption The project, titled "Design a PWM for DC-DC Boost Converters on 180nm CMOS," focuses on supplying power to devices that require higher voltage levels than the original power source.
Aim of the study
This study aims to develop and implement a PWM technique based on a four-transistor comparison to enhance performance and simplify the improved converter system The objectives include reducing complexity and power consumption in the power conversion process while introducing a novel PWM improvement approach within traditional CMOS technology This advancement is expected to enhance the performance and stability of digital systems, ultimately lowering manufacturing costs and energy consumption in practical applications.
Methodology
The implementation team for behavior studies on pulse-width modulation (PWM) converters and DC-DC boost converters began by researching and synthesizing theories from various sources to create principle diagrams and calculate modeling parameters Following this, experimental methods were employed to validate the results obtained The study was conducted through a structured process to ensure accuracy and reliability in the findings.
- Solve problem 1: Theoretical Analysis and Synthesis Gathering and synthesizing data from diverse assets to recognize the essential standards and layout necessities of PWM converters and DC-DC converters
- Solve problem 2: Design and Calculation Developing precept diagrams and calculating unique parameters vital for the modeling and implementation of PWM converters and DC-DC enhance converters
- Solve problem 3: Experimental Verification Using experimental strategies to check and validate the overall performance and effectiveness of the designed PWM converters and DC-DC improve converters
This method ensured that the studies became thorough and the assignment effects were dependable and accurate.
Objectives
Introducing PWM and its design: Components and descriptions of this method
Introducing DC-DC Boost Converter: Components and descriptions of it
Learn the basics and main functions of Virtuoso Cadence simulation design software running on VMware virtual machine platform
Evaluate data reading and writing activities for each specific testbench case based on simulation results
Research content
- Overview of boost and PWM converters
LITTERATURE REVIEW
COMPARATOR
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are typically designed for poor feedback to ensure stable circuit behavior, while comparators function in open-loop configurations without feedback Comparators are commonly used in virtual circuits, often following an op-amp stage, and play a crucial role in Analog-to-Digital Converters (ADCs) by sampling an initial analog input signal and comparing it to determine its digital equivalent.
Moreover, comparators are applied in diverse packages including top detectors, zero-crossing detectors, Bi-Level Threshold Comparator (BLTC) circuits, and switching energy regulators
Figure 3 The voltage characteristics of the ideal comparator
Comparators are essential components in digital circuits, responsible for comparing voltages and producing an output that indicates which voltage is higher They take an input pulse voltage \( V_p \) and a steady reference DC voltage \( V_n \) at their respective terminals When \( V_p \) surpasses \( V_n \), the comparator outputs a logic 1; conversely, if \( V_p \) is lower than \( V_n \), the output becomes logic 0 Although this binary operation seems simple, it must account for real-world transition regions between states Comparators can be categorized into open-loop, regenerative, and hybrid types Open-loop comparators are basic operational amplifiers that may operate slower, while regenerative comparators utilize positive feedback for rapid comparisons Hybrid comparators combine features of both types, achieving a balance between speed and stability Understanding these types and their switching characteristics is crucial for effective digital system design.
Comparators own appropriate static traits and are defined as follows
Comparator gain is calculated by
Figure 4 Comparator – first-order model
ViH and ViL: ViH refers back to the smaller input voltage in which the output switches to VOH, whilst ViL is the bigger input voltage similar to VOL
Offset in comparators manifests as systematic and random components, in general, because of transistor mismatches affecting threshold voltages and transconductance parameters (β=μCox W/L)
This stabilizes the comparator`s operation with the aid of minimizing the effect of small input variations
This is the voltage determined on the comparator's output while each input terminal is grounded
Differences in currents getting into the input terminals of a balanced amplifier are termed as input current offsets
This denotes the minimal input voltage alternate required to propose a legitimate binary output switch
If the comparator operates with bias in an intermediate region, noise introduces variability, main to jitter and uncertainty in its performance
Figure 5 Model of first-order comparator with voltage input and noise
Input common mode range (ICMR)
ICMR is described because of the variety of input voltage that the comparator typically operates and meets all of the required specifications
Comparator involves the following dynamic characteristics
It refers back to the responding velocity of the amplifier whilst an input sign is applied It is likewise stated to be the postponed distinction between input and output
Figure 6 The propagation delay of the comparator
Calculation of propagation delay is done by:
Propagation time delay = ( Rise time - Fall Time )/2 (2.2)
Speed, inversely proportional to propagation delay, is described by
The slew ratio refers back to the price of alternate output voltages primarily based totally on time
Rate of extrude of higher and decreased fees of the comparator tends to emerge as larger than the slew price limits the dynamics and the relation is dictated as:
Tp= ΔT= ΔV/SR=(VOH-VOL)/2SR (2.6)
In that denotes the slew ratio of the comparator:
RAMP GENERATOR
The Low Power Ramp Generator utilizing MOSFET and CNTFET technology, along with a TransistoPWM and PFM Controlled Buck Converter, is specifically designed for wearable electronic devices This innovative approach allows for efficient power management and precise control of voltage levels, enhancing the performance of wearable technology Tihomir Brusev's analysis provides insights into the operating principles and functionality of this ramp generator, demonstrating its significance in the advancement of low-power electronic applications.
The output degree of the ramp generator includes contemporary mirrors
These contemporary mirrors are used to outline the charging and discharging currents of the output capacitor C1
The circuit consists of a couple of MOSFETs (Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field- Effect Transistors) categorized M1 to M13/M14
The transistors shape a part of the current mirrors and the opposite circuit additives are wanted for the ramp generation
A resistor categorized R1 is a part of the circuit and performs a position in figuring out the current via sure transistors
C1 is the output capacitor whose charging and discharging decide the ramp waveform
VDD is the deliver voltage
Vamp is a reference voltage used to govern the ramp waveform
Vramp_out is the output of the ramp generator, that is a ramp waveform
Current mirrors within the circuit ensure that the current in one section is mirrored in another, which is essential for maintaining stable charging and discharging currents in capacitor C1.
The charging and discharging of C1 decides the form and frequency of the ramp waveform
The current flowing via C1 is described via way of means of the current mirror, for that reason controlling the ramp generator`s output
The switching frequency fs of the dollar converter relies upon at the cost of the ramp capacitor C1 and the contemporary flowing through it
This frequency is critical for the operation of the dollar converter because it determines how frequently the converter switches on and stale to adjust the output voltage.
SINGLE-STAGE DIFFERENTIAL AMPLIFIER WITH ACTIVE LOAD
The differential amplifier is a crucial component in analog circuit design, particularly within operational amplifier circuits By utilizing an active load, it enhances performance, delivering improved voltage gain and a higher common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) compared to configurations that employ passive loads.
Figure 9 Schematic of differential amplifier with active load
A single-stage differential amplifier with an active load typically includes the following key components:
+ Differential Pair: Two NMOS transistors (M1 and M2) forming the differential pair
+ Active Load: Two PMOS transistors (M3 and M4) used as the active load
+ Current Mirror: One or more NMOS transistors (M5) to provide a stable current source
+ Biasing Circuit: Ensures that the differential pair operates in the desired region
When a differential input voltage is applied to the gates of transistors M1 and M2, the current through each transistor adjusts according to the voltage difference An increase in the input voltage at M1 compared to M2 results in increased current flow through M1 and reduced current through M2, and the opposite occurs when M2's voltage is higher.
PMOS transistors M3 and M4 serve as active loads for the differential pair, enhancing the amplifier's overall voltage gain due to their high output impedance in the saturation region The output signal is obtained differentially from the drains of M3 (Vo+) and M4 (Vo-).
The current mirror (M5) serves as a reliable current source for the differential pair, ensuring consistent functionality Typically integrated within a current mirror circuit, M5 mirrors and maintains the current flowing through another transistor, which is not depicted in the simplified diagram.
The voltage gain of a single-stage differential amplifier with an active load is primarily influenced by the transconductance (gm) of the NMOS transistors and the output resistance (ro) of the active load.
𝐴𝑣=𝑔𝑚⋅𝑟𝑜 (2.7) where: gm is the transconductance of the NMOS transistors ro is the output resistance of the PMOS transistors
The transconductance 𝑔𝑚 of the NMOS transistors is calculated as follows:
The output resistance 𝑟𝑜 of the PMOS transistors is calculated as follows:
Effective biasing ensures that NMOS transistors M1 and M2 operate within the saturation region, essential for linear amplification Typically, the biasing circuit is designed using a current mirror to provide a stable supply for the differential pair.
To achieve optimal performance in differential pairs, it is crucial to match the transistors (M1 and M2) with the energetic load (M3 and M4) This matching minimizes offset limits and significantly improves the common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR).
2.3.5.3 Common-Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR)
A high Common-Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR) indicates an amplifier's ability to effectively reject common-mode signals, such as noise Enhancing CMRR can be achieved by matching transistors and utilizing a current mirror with high output impedance.
PULSE WIDTH MODULATION
Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) is a technique for transforming output AC energy through various converter duty cycles at high frequencies, resulting in low-frequency voltage or current Recent research focuses on optimizing PWM strategies to minimize unwanted harmonics and conversion losses PWM is primarily categorized into two types: carrier-based and pre-programmed, each with distinct advantages and drawbacks Selecting the appropriate PWM method is crucial for power converters to achieve optimal performance Among PWM systems, four-transistor comparators are suggested to address the limitations of two-level converters, while common PWM types include single, multichannel, and sinusoidal PWM.
The four-transistor comparator configuration in PWM is an advanced technique designed to improve converter performance significantly By utilizing four transistors instead of the traditional three in a conventional inverter, this design enhances conversion efficiency while reducing energy loss This innovative approach not only boosts overall machine performance but also minimizes unwanted issues such as interference and power loss.
The 3 typically used forms of PWM are single-channel PWM, multi-channel PWM, and sinusoidal PWM Single PWM is the simplest, it adjusts the heartbeat width of the PWM pulse primarily based totally on a evaluation signal Multi-channel PWM permits pulse width adjustment of a couple of output channels simultaneously, appropriate for multi-channel programs together with multi-segment control Sine PWM generates PWM
23 pulses that simulate a sine wave shape, generating a current or voltage towards a sine wave, supporting to limit undesirable harmonics and enhance output energy quality
In summary, PWM is a vital generation in energy conversion programs, and cautious choice of PWM strategies can play a decisive position in reaching the satisfactory machine overall performance and quality
In single PWM (Pulse Width Modulation), each cycle of the modulation produces a single, highly effective output pulse during half of the cycle This method ensures that one optimal pulse is generated for every input signal cycle, with the pulse width being varied to control the output voltage or current.
In single PWM (Pulse Width Modulation), the gate signal is created by comparing a square wave input with a reference triangular wave, which typically has a frequency similar to that of the square wave When the square wave crosses the reference level, the gate signal is triggered, resulting in an output pulse The duration of this pulse depends on the difference between the square wave and the reference triangular wave at the moment of activation.
To adjust the output voltage or current, the primary method involves varying the width of the PWM pulses By changing the ratio of time that the input signal exceeds the reference level, the desired output voltage or current level can be effectively modified.
Single Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) is a simple yet highly effective technique for regulating output voltage or current in a system Its ability to adjust the width of PWM pulses provides precise control and flexibility, enabling optimal tuning of the converter's performance.
Figure 10 Theory about single PWM
The RMS value of the AC output voltage of single PWM is:
The duty cycle is given by:
Modulation Index is given by:
The reference sign Vref and provider sign voltage are crucial parameters in the system The pulse width and RMS output voltages vary from zero to Tsec and zero to Vrms, respectively, as the control signal amplitude fluctuates between zero and Vc.
Multiple Pulse Width Modulation (MPWM) is a modulation technique that generates multiple pulses within each half-cycle of the modulation period, with all pulses typically maintaining the same width The switching of power devices in the converter is controlled by gating signals, which are produced by comparing a triangular reference signal with a square reference signal.
The triangular reference sign frequency, known as 𝑓𝑜, is crucial for determining the converter's essential output frequency In contrast, the square reference sign frequency, referred to as the provider frequency (𝑓𝑐), influences the number of pulses produced within each half-cycle.
To determine the pulse variety 𝑝 for each half-cycle, it is essential to establish a relationship between the output frequency and the carrier frequency This relationship is crucial for ensuring accurate pulse generation and proper modulation The specific calculation for 𝑝 may vary based on the modulation technique used and the application's requirements.
MPWM gives numerous blessings over conventional single-pulse PWM techniques
By producing a couple of pulses inside every half-cycle, MPWM can obtain better
25 decisions in controlling the output voltage or current waveform This extended decision can cause upgrades in output quality, consisting of decreased harmonic distortion and higher efficiency
MPWM offers enhanced flexibility in customizing output waveforms and adjusting modulation characteristics to meet specific device requirements This adaptability makes MPWM particularly suitable for applications where precise control of output waveforms is crucial, such as in motor drives, power converters, and renewable energy systems.
Multiple Pulse Width Modulation (MPWM) is an advanced modulation technique that produces multiple pulses within each half-cycle, offering enhanced flexibility and control over the output waveform By precisely adjusting the gating signals through comparisons of triangular and square reference signals, MPWM facilitates accurate modulation and efficient operation of power conversion systems The calculation of half cycles is essential for its implementation.
The RMS ac voltage is given by
The duty cycle is given by
The modulation index (MI), starting from zero to 1, affects the heartbeat widths and voltage output, various among zero to π/p and zero to Vs respectively
Figure 11 Theory of Multiple PWM
Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation (SPWM) is a widely utilized technique in electrical electronics for the control of inverters and converters This method generates multiple output pulses, with the width of each pulse varying in accordance with the amplitude of a corresponding sine wave input.
SPWM, or Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation, aims to create a sinusoidal output waveform by varying the pulse width in each half-cycle of the modulation period This process involves comparing a sinusoidal reference signal, which represents the desired output waveform, with a high-frequency triangular carrier signal Typically, the carrier frequency is significantly higher than that of the desired output waveform.
Here`s how SPWM normally works:
DC-DC BOOST CONVERTER
The DC-DC boost converter utilizes Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) to enhance voltage levels across various systems, delivering a stable and higher output voltage This technology enables precise voltage control, improves energy efficiency, and adapts to diverse power requirements, ensuring reliable performance in modern electrical and electronic applications Its versatility makes it an essential component for optimizing energy management in a wide range of devices.
The Boost DC-DC converter is essential in energy electronics, facilitating the conversion of low DC voltage to a higher quasi-DC voltage This quasi-DC voltage primarily consists of a DC component with a slight superimposed alternating element, as detailed in the analysis of non-isolated high-voltage-gain DC-DC Boost converters and the impact of parasitic components on the dynamic performance of PWM Buck and Boost converters in continuous conduction mode (CCM).
AC ripple, although minimal compared to the DC voltage, allows the output to be accurately regarded as DC, which supports the designation "DC to DC converter." The basic operation is illustrated in the accompanying figure.
Figure 14 Basic Inductor-based boost DC-DC converter
The waveform characteristics of a lift converter are heavily influenced by the current flowing through the inductor, which can operate in either Continuous Conduction Mode (CCM) or Discontinuous Conduction Mode (DCM) In CCM, the inductor maintains a constant current from the input to the output terminal, ensuring that one switch activates immediately as the other turns off, thereby eliminating any overlap or dead time Conversely, in DCM, there is a period where the current through the inductor falls to zero, resulting in both switches being open simultaneously during this dead time.
The improved converter operates in the on-time phase when the low-aspect energy switch (L) is closed and the high-aspect energy switch (H) is open During this phase, the voltage at the converter's midpoint, which is grounded, remains at zero Consequently, the current flowing through the inductor (L) increases at a steady rate, determined by the input voltage and the inductor's value.
Regarding the output voltage Vout of the converter, whilst a consistent current supply masses the output capacitor, the voltage decreases progressively in percentage to the current:
After the on-time phase, the enhanced converter transitions into the off-time phase, where the low-side switch (L) is open and the high-side switch (H) is closed This phase is illustrated in the accompanying circuit and waveform diagram In this configuration, the converter midpoint is linked to the output, resulting in a voltage at this point (mid) that closely resembles the output DC voltage (out,dc) Consequently, the current flowing through the inductor (L) appears to be reduced by a constant ratio.
During the off-line phase, the capacitor load not only discharges through the standard current load but also receives charge from the inductor, which releases current as described by the relevant equation Consequently, in the off-time phase, the output voltage is satisfied by this interaction.
Figure 15 Boost DC-DC converter in the on-time phase
Figure 16 Boost DC-DC converter in the off-time phase
Figure 17 Timing plot of main signals of CCM
The Continuous Conduction Mode (CCM) increase converter operates in two main phases: the on-time and off-time sections The timing diagram illustrates the operation of this CCM increase DC-to-DC converter In contrast, during the switching period of a DC-to-DC converter in Discontinuous Conduction Mode (DCM), a dead-time section occurs when each switch is open The accompanying waveform highlights the operation of the increase converter during this dead-time section, where both switches remain open.
In a Discontinuous Conduction Mode (DCM) DC-to-DC converter, when the voltage at the midpoint matches the input voltage, both the voltage and current within the inductor drop to zero During the on-time phase, the converter's output remains stable, leading to a decrease in output voltage as indicated by the corresponding equation The timing diagram illustrating the primary signals of this process is shown in the figure below.
Figure 18 Timing plot at useless-time phase
Figure 19 Timing plot of DCM
The voltage conversion ratio, defined as the ratio of output voltage to input voltage, is a crucial parameter in DC-DC converters For precise applications, it is essential to maintain a consistent ratio, necessitating a thorough understanding of its relationship with various design parameters Notably, the expressions that define this ratio differ significantly based on whether the converter operates in Continuous Conduction Mode (CCM) or Discontinuous Conduction Mode (DCM).
In Continuous Conduction Mode (CCM), the duty cycle of the converter significantly influences the ratio, while in Discontinuous Conduction Mode (DCM), this ratio is determined by the duty cycle, inductor value (L), and load resistor The derivation of this expression typically involves the voltage-second balance of the inductor, which ensures that the energy stored in the inductor is zero over a switching cycle, maintaining a voltage-second balance of zero.
Thus, with CCM, it displays the equation
2.5.1 Configuration for basic boost converter
The term "increase" refers to the converter's ability to produce an output voltage that exceeds the input voltage A MOSFET-based boost converter operates in two distinct modes: Mode 1 and Mode 2 In Mode 1, starting at time t=0, transistor M1 is in the ON position, allowing increased current to flow through the inductor L and M1 Conversely, Mode 2 begins at time t=t1, with the transistor in the OFF position, causing the current to circulate through the inductor, capacitor C, load, and diode Dm During this phase, the current through the inductor decreases until the next cycle begins, transferring the energy stored in inductor L to the load resistor.
Figure 20 Operation of the boost converter at (a) Mode 1 and (b) Mode 2
The waveform showed by boost converters depending on current and voltage are expressed in figure below
Figure 21 Variation of voltage and current with time
The connection between current and voltage despite inductor L is given as
With a constant rectangular pulse is shown as below v t
Current flows through the circuit when transistor is OFF mode and is shown as
Here, VDm and VM1 constitute the voltage drops throughout the diode Dm and the transistor M1 respectively
The output voltage Vout is decided via way of means of calculating the values of the current flowing through those components
The voltage drop in the diode and transistor is neglected
The improve converter features a closed-loop design utilizing MOSFET transfer It operates with an input voltage (VinV), a switching frequency of 1 kHz, an inductance of 3 mH, a capacitance of 1000 pF, and a load resistance of 100 Ohms, delivering a specified output voltage (V).
The differential equation describing the converter conduct at some stage in the ON mode of the transfer is
Where an equal resistance of the capacitor, the burden resistance and L the inductance
As the transfer transits to ON, the boost converter output voltage is shown as
The output voltage in this mode is (2.39)
The error is given by
Thus the error is the assessment of real and extraordinary voltages
This section explores the functioning of a non-linear DC-DC boost converter that utilizes a MOSFET as its switching component The primary variables influencing its performance are the inductor current and the output voltage The duty cycle, represented as "D," regulates the switching process through Pulse Width Modulation (PWM).
The converter operates in continuous conduction mode (CCM), where the MOSFET switch turns ON, allowing current to flow through the inductor and store energy This stored energy is subsequently delivered to the output capacitor through the load resistor, maintaining a stable output voltage The relationship between the capacitor voltage and the load resistor ensures that the output remains constant, even with fluctuations in input or load conditions.
In summary, the operation of the DC-DC increase converter entails complicated dynamics because of its non-linear conduct with recognition to mode and manage inputs
By modulating the responsibility cycle through PWM, the converter correctly regulates
41 the output voltage by controlling the strength switch from the inductor to the output capacitor, thereby pleasant its designed feature below non-non-stop conduction mode
Figure 22 DC-DC Boost Converter
Then, the saved electricity is provided to the burden again, while the location of the transfer is in The variant in inductor current and capacitor voltage is shown as
SIMULATION
RAMP GENERATOR
Figure 23 Schematic of ramp generator
Figure 24 Waveform of Ramp Generator
Ramp waveform Vmax = 1.8 (V) , Vmin = 1.8 mV
SINGLE-STAGE DIFFERENTIAL AMPLIFIER WITH ACTIVE LOAD
Figure 25 Schematic of differential amplifier with active load where : λ is the channel-length modulation parameter
Figure 26 Waveform of differential amplifier with active load
At we calculated, Av=Vo/Vi=1.785 (V) /0.1 (V) => Av.85
PULSE WIDTH MODULATION
So this PWM based on the sinusoidal PWM as we can see that when sinusoidal signal and ramp signal is 1 the output will be 1 and vice versa
DC-DC BOOST CONVERTER
The proposed Boost Converter scheme is illustrated in the block diagram below The simulation utilizes specific machine parameter values, with the selected values for the inductor, capacitors, and resistors detailed in the accompanying table.
L=0.36mH, CFuF, for 1% ripple, and R0 ohm The predictions are proven with the aid of designing, building, and testing the improve DC-DC boost converters
Figure 29 Schematic of DC-DC Boost Converter
After constructing the schematic for the DC-DC boost converter, we will proceed to adjust the input current Following the configuration of ADE L, I will present a summary of the results in the table below.
Table 3.4.1: The relationship between Input Current and Output Voltage
Input current (mA) Output voltage (V)
Figure 30 Waveform of DC-DC Boost converter at I0mA
The DC-DC boost converter, operating with an input current of 100mA, successfully produces an output voltage of 10.13V and delivers an ultra-current output of around 0.0395A The waveform analysis indicates minimal fluctuations, highlighting the need for a robust tool to maintain a stable energy stage.
Figure 31 Waveform of DC-DC Boost converter at I 0mA
The DC-DC boost converter delivers an output voltage of 11.15V and an output current of around 0.0718A with an input current of 200mA Compared to an input current of 100mA, the converter exhibits enhanced oscillation performance, although it maintains stability after a short period of operation.
Figure 32 Waveform of DC-DC Boost converter at IP0mA
The DC-DC boost converter operates with an input current of 500mA, producing an output voltage of 13.13V and an output current of approximately 0.1523A At an input current of 200mA, the waveform exhibits significant fluctuations, resulting in an extended healing time.
Figure 33 Waveform of DC-DC Boost converter at I00mA
The DC-DC boost converter, operating with an input current of 1000mA, delivers an output voltage of 18.13V and an output current of around 0.2205A However, the output waveform exhibits significant fluctuations and the longest recovery time compared to other scenarios, indicating that the device is nearing its operational limits and may experience instability as the electrical load increases.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Conclusion
In Boost Converters, employing a four-transistor comparator significantly benefits circuit design by minimizing transistor count, which leads to reduced logical area and power consumption in conventional CMOS technology Simulation results demonstrate that this comparator design achieves exceptionally low energy consumption, underscoring its effectiveness and compatibility for Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) applications in Boost Converters.
This article explores effective solutions to the design challenges associated with Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) in Boost Converters By accurately estimating parameters and duty cycles through simulation, the operational characteristics of Boost Converters are thoroughly analyzed Furthermore, performance calculations provide quantitative insights into the efficiency of Boost Converters, highlighting their effectiveness in energy conversion applications.
The proposed four-transistor comparator has been effectively tested through circuit layout and simulation using Cadence Virtuoso This process not only confirms the functionality of the comparator but also highlights its reduced transistor count, significantly lowering both the logical area and power consumption compared to traditional designs.
Integrating PWM techniques with Boost Converters offers substantial benefits, achieving energy consumption as low as 1mW while simplifying design complexity Future research should explore expanding this PWM framework to various applications, potentially leading to further reductions in current and energy usage compared to traditional PWM methods These advancements could enhance the efficiency and sustainability of energy conversion technologies.
Recommendation
Based at the evaluation and findings of the take a look at at the four-transistor comparator for Boost Converters, the recommendations can interest on numerous key areas:
To enhance the performance metrics of the four-transistor comparator, additional optimization and validation efforts are essential This involves refining the layout parameters to improve overall performance and further reduce power consumption while ensuring robustness across a wider range of operating conditions.
Exploration in Other Converter Topologies: Extend the software program of
The proposed PWM layout enhances Boost Converters, positioning it as a unique Switched Mode Power Supply (SMPS) topology, alongside the Buck converter This innovative comparator design aims to optimize power conversion efficiency and significantly reduce current consumption in these configurations.
Integrating the four-transistor comparator into practical applications is essential for validating its average overall performance in real-world scenarios This implementation will provide valuable insights into the comparator's reliability, durability, and scalability when deployed in actual digital devices and systems.
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of the four-transistor comparator against traditional PWM designs involves analyzing production costs, integration simplicity, and the average performance of established devices This assessment is crucial for determining the economic viability of implementing this technology in industrial applications.
Researching advanced control techniques can enhance the performance of the four-transistor comparator layout by integrating superior strategies and algorithms Techniques such as predictive control and adaptive algorithms should be explored to optimize switching frequency and improve response to dynamic load conditions, ultimately leading to enhanced overall performance and quicker reactions.
Fostering collaboration among researchers, engineers, and employer stakeholders is essential for sharing insights and advancements in PWM technology utilizing the four-transistor comparator This collective effort can enhance innovation and promote the adoption of green power conversion solutions across various sectors.
Focusing on these recommendations, destiny studies and development efforts can enhance the capabilities of the four-transistor comparator, leading to improved power conversion efficiency, reduced energy consumption, and the promotion of sustainable practices in electronic systems and devices.
1 Y J Park, J H Park, H J Kim, H Ryu, S Y Kim, "A Design of a 92.4% Efficiency Triple Mode Control DC–DC Buck Converter With Low Power Retention Mode and Adaptive Zero Current Detector for IoT/Wearable Applications", IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol 32, no 9, pp 6946-6960, Sept 2017
2 H C Foong, Y Zheng, Y K Tan, and M T Tan, “Fast-transient integrated digital DC-DC converter with predictive and feed forward control,” IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I, Reg Paper, vol 59, no 7, pp 1567-1576, Jul 2012
3 Khoa Van Pham, etc., “A Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting Circuit For a Wearable Application,” Institute of Korean Electrical and Electronics Engineers, vol 21, iss 1, pp 66-69, 2017
4 Yu-Chi Huang, Hsin-Chao Chen, Tin-Jong Tai, and Ke-Horng Chen “Dual-Section- Average (DSA) Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) in Digital Pulse Width Modulation (DPWM) DC-DC Converter for Reducing the Problem of Limiting Cycle,” IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference, November 3-5, pp.145-148, 2008
5 On-Chip Ramp Generators for Mixed-Signal BIST and ADC Self-Test by Benoit Provost, Student Member, IEEE, and Edgar Sánchez-Sinencio, Fellow, IEEE JOURNAL
OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS, VOL 38, NO 2, FEBRUARY 2003
6 S Reeba Rex, D.M Mary Synthia Regis Praba "Design of PWM with four transistor comparator for DC–DC boost converters", Microprocessors and Microsystems, 2020
7 C Cheng, L Lin, J Lin, K Chen, Y Lin, J R Lin and T Tsai, "A DVS-Based Burst Mode with Automatic Entrance Point Control Technique in DC-DC Boost Converter for Wearable Devices and IoT Applications", 2017 IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference (A-SSCC), Seoul, 2017, pp 121-124
8 Virtuoso Analog Design Environment, www.cadence.com
9 On-Chip Ramp Generators for Mixed-Signal BIST and ADC Self-Test Benoit Provost, Student Member, IEEE, and Edgar Sánchez-Sinencio, Fellow, IEEE IEEE JOURNAL
OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS, VOL 38, NO 2, FEBRUARY 2003
10 Babazadeh et al (2019) "A New Non-Isolated Buck-Boost Converter with High Voltage Gain and Positive Output Voltage for Renewable Energy Applications” International Power Electronics, Drive Systems and Technologies Conference, pp 201-
11 Mariya Spasova, Tihomir Brusev, George Angelov, Rossen Radonov, Marin Hristov
"Low Power Ramp Generator with MOSFET and CNTFET Transistors", 2019 IEEE XXVIII International Scientific Conference Electronics (ET), 2019
12 Daying Sun, Jiayi Hu, Chong Wang, Xiong Cheng, Wenhua Gu "A Delay-Line DPWM Architecture With Compensation Module and Delay-Adjustable Unit Based on DLL", IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2021
13 Reatti, A., F et al (2019) "Effect of Parasitic Components on Dynamic Performance of Power Stages of DC-DC PWM Buck and Boost Converters in CCM." IEEE
International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pp 1-5
14 Altimania et al (2019) “Operation and Analysis of Non-Isolated High-Voltage-Gain DC-DC Boost Converter with Voltage Multiplier in the DCM." IEEE Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI), pp 1-6