TABLE OF CONTENTSFCRA Hand Book May 2010 SECTION I: FUNDS, SOURCES & RECEIVERS pdf

UNCDF – United Nations Capital Development Fund, New York 88.. UNCTAD – United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva 89.. UNFPA – United Nations Population Fund, New York..

TABLE

OF CONTENTS

FCRA Hand Book May 2010

SECTION I: FUNDS, SOURCES & RECEIVERS

Before we go into the technicalities of FCRA, we try to get an overview of the money involved: how much money is received each year, who gives this money, who receives, and what is it used for

The data given in this section is mostly based on reliable sources (except the

narratives in the profiles) However, please keep in mind that this is not all the foreign aid that flows into India – aid received and redistributed by the Government

is not included here Similarly, aid received by NGOs from UN Organisations or the World Bank is not included in these figures

This section includes the following chapters:

Error: Reference source not found

Error: Reference source not found

Error: Reference source not found

Error: Reference source not found

Error: Reference source not found

Error: Reference source not found

SOURCES AND CAUTION

Bulk of the analysis presented in this section is based on the annual ‘Inflow of

Foreign Contribution Report’ prepared by the Ministry of Home Affairs This report provides a lot of valuable data on foreign contribution For this analysis, we have used the annual reports for 1996-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07 and 07-08 We would like to place on record our appreciation of the hard work the FCRA Department puts in while compiling this information, despite limited personnel and infrastructure

There are some limitations on the present analysis Some of the charts may be misinterpreted, if taken casually You are, therefore, requested to carefully read the notes for each chart Also in general:

• Foreign contribution in kind (material) is sometimes not valued or reported

by receiving NGOs The figures and analysis will be distorted accordingly

• The data includes all money reported as received for educational, social, religious, cultural, or economic programs ‘Social-change institutions’,

development organisations, religious bodies, universities, and hospitals may receive this money as also NGOs set up by the Government For easier

reading and in the absence of any definite classification, we have used the term NGO for all these

• The FCRA department actually makes no real distinction between grant making agencies and NGOs We have used the term Agency to indicate that

an organisation is mainly involved in making grants to other NGOs

A crore means 10,000,000 or ten million A lakh means 100,000 One crore of Indian Rupees is currently equal to about 219,000 US Dollars, about 160,000 Euro, and 145,000 British Pounds

Profiles of the donors given in this section have been compiled from various sources, including the Internet We hold out no warranties for the accuracy or fairness of the

decisions We have also avoided the use of religious honorifics This is not intended

as disrespect to the religious beliefs of any person FCRA means Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976

INFLOW OF FOREIGN CONTRIBUTION REF _ R EF 2 4 87 6 9 6 0 0 \H \* M ER GEF O RMAT

HOW MANY ARE REGISTERED

FRESH REGISTRATIONS AND PRIOR-PERMISSIONS

In 2007-08 REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT , about 866 associations were given FCRA

registration and 367 associations were granted prior-permission to receive foreign contribution Another 2,342 individuals were granted permission to avail foreign hospitality under FCRA After a sharp rise in 03-04, the total number of registrations and permissions seems to have come down to 2300 annually There is also a creeping reduction in FCRA registrations, whereas the share of prior permissions has risen gradually This might reflect a growing reluctance in the FCRA Department to grant 'eternal' FCRA registration to associations As we see later, the FCRA Department would rather prefer that the FCRA status of associations was reviewed periodically

PRESENT STATUS

By October 2009 , a total of 38,374 associations were registered with FCRA Apart

from these, about 500 associations had prior-permission Together, this comes to about 39,000 associations

HOW MANY FILE FC-3?

Not all Only about 60-70% files FC-3 regularly The number of associations filing FC-3 has grown at about 5% annually over the last 16 years This does not mean improved compliance Why? Because number of registered associations has also grown over last 16 years

WHAT ABOUT THE REST?

The law requires that FC-3 must be filed REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT even if no foreign contribution is received in a year However, the balance 30-40% seems to be quite

consistent in not filing their FC-3 in time!

FCRA Department then issues them a notice If they ignore the notice, this leads to cancellation of FC registration In the past, Government has cancelled FC

registration of:

• 203 organizations in July-96 REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT

• 497 organisations in September 1997 REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT

• 8,673 organisations in 2005 REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT

Of the last lot, 421 had their FCRA status restored REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT when the filed the pending FC-3 or provided proof that it had been filed earlier

HOW MUCH DID THEY RECEIVE

Going back to the ones who did file their FC-3, let’s see how much was received.Foreign contribution has gone up from Rs.1,412 crores in 91-

92 REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT to Rs.11,337 crores in 06-07

That means an annual growth rate of 14.9% over these sixteen years The rate has been lowered somewhat due to stagnation in 94-95 and 2003-04 However, there is sharp increase in 2006-07 which is about 44 % increase over the previous year.

If you look at the average funds received per association, this has also gone up In 92-93, the average was Rs.15.5 lakhs In 07-08, it had risen to Rs.51 lakhs This is an increase of 9.13% per year per NGO

What contributes to this rate of growth? Firstly, there is inflation Budgets have to increase every year just to remain at the same level in real purchasing power To understand this, look at the chart alongside, which uses change in gold prices to show the effect of inflation on foreign contribution.

Secondly, Rupee has fallen quite a bit over the last sixteen years In 1992, a dollar would get you 28 Rupees Today, it gets you 46 Rupees In some ways, this increases the ability of Agencies to fund programs in India

Thirdly, program activities have also probably increased over the years, and finally relief and rehabilitation under Tsunami and other calamities

WHAT DID THEY RECEIVE IT FOR

THE FC-3 CLASSIFICATION

Many NGOs find it difficult to slot their funds into the categories set out in form

FC-3 Also, quite often the purposes given in FC-3 overlap

There is also another category: “Other activities” Around 30% of the funds are reported under this While this makes analysis difficult, it also shows how difficult it

is to categorize NGOs’ work

What do the table and the chart tell us?

• Money for purely religious activities remains more or less the same, around 10% Of course, contrary to popular belief, this money is not for Christian missionaries alone Money comes in for other religions also, including

• Similarly, the amount for disaster relief has been low over this period A total

of Rs.111.07 crores was received from 96-97 to 98-99 These were also years when there was no major earthquake or cyclone Tragically, these figures jumped to 163.33 crores in 99-00, with the Orissa cyclone in Oct-99

• Though India is a land of history, very little is received by NGOs for

maintenance of historical and cultural places From 96-97 to 99-00, this came

to just Rs.6.95 crores! Partly, this is due to the sprawling presence of

ASI REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Then again, this work is probably low priority for most international agencies except UNESCO And UNESCO funds will not be reported under FCRA.

• Quite a bit comes in for building construction, though:

And then some money is spent on repairs and maintenance Over the last four years, this amounted to Rs.539.49 crores

HOW MANY ARE RELIGIOUS…

Out of the 26,799 associations registered with FCRA Department by August 2003, 28% had one or more religious objectives REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT A breakup of these organisations according to their faith is given alongside

HOW MANY RECEIVED A CRORE AND ABOVE…

With the continuing erosion of Rupee, a crore REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT today is not what it used to be In 91-92, just 249 associations received over a crore By 2007-08, this had risen to 1695 associations

Of course, if we adjust this for inflation, using gold prices as a base, we find that the increase was only

AND THE TOP 5 WERE…

The MHA annual report lists the names of five top receivers every year Their names and receipts for last nine years REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT are given below:

COUNTRY OF ORIGIN…

Where does all this money come from? The MHA reports for last six years (1996-97 to 2001-02) list about 178 countries, ranging from USA (Rs.1,658 crores) to Macau, Laos, Sudan (Rs.1,000 each!) Then there are smaller donors who are not listed

individually – this adds up to around Rs.57 crores in 96-97 and Rs.25 crores in 02

2001-The following table summarizes contribution of top eighteen donor countries who have contributed at least Rs.100 crores over last six years (1996-97 to 2007-08):

Flow of funds from Spain and USA is rising faster than other countries For example, funds from Spain have grown annually at a compounded rate of 24% In the case of USA, the rate of growth is 23%.

STATE-WISE DISTRIBUTION OF FOREIGN CONTRIBUTION REF _ R EF 2 4 87 6 9 6 0 0 \H \* M ER GEF O RMAT

This analysis provides information on how the foreign contribution is distributed across the country – which areas receive more funds, which do not It is hoped that this will provide useful data for people working with NGOs and Agencies

STATE PROFILES: 96-97 TO 06-07

Correlating the state-wise data helps us understand more about how FCRA registered NGOs and funds are spread across the country Remember, however, that some of the averages related to funds may be distorted due to inclusion of grant-making Agencies

in the FC data Some NGOs may be working in multiple states, though headquartered

in a particular state Also simple averages like these are not really suitable for gauging an activity as complex as development or social work

In the following paragraphs, we look more closely at each of the states, from an FCRA angle Keeping in mind the projected population of 2008 (as per Census of India) Secondly, we are talking only about those organizations, which received foreign funds and filed an FC-3 Union Territories are marked with the abbreviation

UT Some of this data is given in a table at the end of the state profiles

ANDAMAN & NICOBAR (UT)

 Received Rs.1.37 crores, 1.57 crores, 0.91 crores, 0.23 crores, 0.62 crores, 0.31 crores, 0.41 crores, 0.87 crores, 1.39 crores, 16.58 crores, 14.02 crores and 7.13 crores in 96-97, 97-

98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth

rate: 16.18 %  Estimated REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Population (2008) 4.49 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 8,249

11 organizations received Rs 7.13 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.65 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.158.80 Average population per organisation was 40,818 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 750 (an area approx 27.3 kms wide and 27.3 kms long) The jump in last two years is due

to Tsunami relief and rehabilitation work

ANDHRA PRADESH

 Received Rs.352.72 crores, 398.08 crores, 487.29 crores, 536.99 crores, 589.52 crores, 559.56 crores, 629.76 crores, 684.20 crores, 913.17 crores, 1,011.57 crores, 1,210.82 crores and 1,167.21 crores in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 11.49%  Estimated Population (2008) 823.75 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 275,068

2,140 organizations received Rs.1,167.21 crores in 07-08,or an average of Rs.55 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.141.69 Average population per

organization was 38,493 people Average area under each organization (in sq k.m.) was 129 (an area approx 11.35 kms wide and 11.35 kms long)

ASSAM

 Received Rs.14.88 crores, 17.32 crores, 22.98 crores, 24.35 crores, 23.40 crores, 32.06 crores, 37.61 crores, 35.25 crores, 40.18 crores, 38.79 crores, 162.69 crores and 96.5 crores

in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 18.52 %  Estimated Population (2008) 294.35 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 78,438

222 organisations received Rs.96.5 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.43 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.32.78 Average population per

organisation was 1,32,590 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 353 (an area approx 18.7 kms wide and 18.7 kms long)

BIHAR

 Received Rs.84.02 crores, 83.24 crores, 100.6 crores, 104.75 crores, 119.21 crores, 68.45 crores, 59.01 crores, 66.83 crores, 79.05 crores, 100.57 crores, 131.40 crores and 134.48 crores in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 4.37 %  Estimated Population (2008) 936.33 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 94,163

718 organizations received Rs.134.48 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.19 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.14.36 Average population per

organization was 1,30,408 people Average area under each organization (in Sq K.M.) was 131 (an area approx 11.4 kms wide and 11.4 kms long)

 Estimated Population (2008) 12.27 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 114

30 organisations received Rs.6.56 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.22 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.53.46 Average population per organisation was 40,900 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 3.8 (an area approx 1.9 kms wide and 1.9 kms long)

CHHATTISGARH

 Received Rs.0.04 crores, 27.92 crores, 31.44 crores, 33.80 crores, 29.21 crores, 33.85 crores, 57.62 crores, 71.07 crores in 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 20.55% (based on 2001-02 data)  Estimated Population (2008) 232.69 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 1,35,194

199 organizations received Rs.71.07 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.36 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.30.54 Average population per

organization was 1,16,930 people Average area under each organization (in sq k.m.) was 679.37 (an area approx 26 kms wide and 26.1 kms long)

DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI (UT)

 Received Rs.0.72 crores, 0.4 crores, 0.71 crores, 0.26 crores, 0.52 crores, 0.64 crores, 0.22 crores, 0.14 crores, 0.40 crores, 0.60 crores, 1.06 crores and 2.82 crores in 96-97, 97-98, 98-

99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 13.23

%  Estimated Population (2008) 2.99 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 491

13 organisations received Rs.2.82 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.22 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.94.31 Average population per organisation was 23,000 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 41 (an area approx 6.4 kms wide and 6.4 kms long) Dadra & Nagar Haveli is classified as a predominantly tribal Union Territory in the report

DAMAN & DIU (UT)

 Received Rs.0.006 crores and 0.10 crores in 96-97, 06-07 Other years’ data not available For 99-00, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05 and 05-06, data combined with Goa  Estimated Population (2008) 2.38 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 112

1 organisation received Rs.0.1 crores or 10 lakhs in 06-07 Average funds per person came to Rs.6.33

DELHI

 Received Rs.346.35 crores, 418.52 crores, 487.28 crores, 636.11 crores, 763.05 crores, 794.42 crores, 880.77 crores, 857.12 crores, 1,075.23 crores, 1,556.46 crores, 2,183.03 crores and 1716,57 crores in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 15.66 %  Estimated Population (2008) 169.55 lakhs

 Land area (Sq K.M.) 1,483

1,181 organizations received Rs.1716.57 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.145 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.1,012.43 Average population per organisation was 14,356 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 1.26 (an area approx 1.1 km wide and 1.1 kms long)

GOA

 Received Rs.13.28 crores, 12.93 crores, 13.29 crores, 13.81 crores, 10.45 crores, 13.66 crores, 14.43 crores, 16.02 crores, 16.46 crores, 16.31 crores, 16.22 crores and 15.13 crores

in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 1.19 %  Estimated Population (2008) 15.96 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 3,702

86 organisations received Rs.15.13 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs 18 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.94.80 Average population per

organisation was 18,558 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 43.05 (an area approx 6.5 kms wide and 6.56 kms long)

 Received Rs.80.25 crores, 71.96 crores, 102.09 crores, 126.95 crores, 207.42 crores, 324.57 crores, 272.26 crores, 191.97 crores, 238.59 crores, 301.22 crores, 390.77 crores and 378.37 crores in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 15.14 %  Estimated Population (2008) 566.26 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 196,024

883 organisations received Rs.378.37 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.43 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.66.82 Average population per

organisation was 64,129 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 222 (an area approx 14.8 kms wide and 14.9 kms long)

HARYANA

 Received Rs.6.71 crores, 5.93 crores, 5.38 crores, 6.70 crores, 7.17 crores, 7.73 crores, 10.43 crores, 9.94 crores, 10.27 crores, 19.65 crores, 34.46 crores and 42.09 crores in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 18.17 %  Estimated Population (2008) 241.71 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 44,212

90 organisations received Rs.42.09 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.47 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.17.41 Average population per

organisation was 2,68,567 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 491.24 (an area approx 22.1 kms wide and 22.2 kms long)

HIMACHAL PRADESH

 Received Rs.40.16 crores, 44.50 crores, 64.32 crores, 68.20 crores, 82.50 crores, 74.10 crores, 52.69 crores, 76.48 crores, 72.56 crores, 83.24 crores, 104.19 crores and 120.41 crores in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 10.5 %  Estimated Population (2008) 65.95 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 55,673

101 organisations received Rs.104.19 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.119 lakhs

or 1.19 crore each Average funds per person came to Rs.182.58 Average population per organisation was 65,297 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 551.22 (an area approx 23.47 kms wide and 23.47 kms long)

JAMMU & KASHMIR

 Received Rs.9.93 crores, 2.60 crores, 14.89 crores, 13.64 crores, 10.28 crores, 14.67 crores, 17.75 crores, 22.69 crores, 14.10 crores, 30.42 crores, 102.13 crores and 22.82 crores in 96-

97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 7.86 %  Estimated Population (2008) 112.57 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 101,387

55 organizations received Rs.22.82 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.41 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.20.27 Average population per

organisation was 2,04,673 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 1843.4 (an area approx 42.9 kms wide and 42.9 kms long)

J & K is classified as a sensitive area in the report

JHARKHAND

 Received Rs.0.15 crores, 52.66 crores, 57.77 crores, 59.93 crores, 76.91 crores, 96.96 crores, 110.47 crores and 127.52 in 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 15.88 % (based on 2001-02 data)  Estimated Population (2008) 301.81 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 79,714

410 organisations received Rs.127.52 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.31 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.42.25 Average population per

organisation was 73,612 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 194.42 (an area approx 13.9 kms wide and 13.9 kms long)

KARNATAKA

 Received Rs.274.16 crores, 315.88 crores, 354.73 crores, 411.34 crores, 489.96 crores, 504.99 crores, 489.12 crores, 528.56 crores, 511.99 crores, 621.23 crores, 1,077.13 crores and 890.47 in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-

08  Annual growth rate: 11.3 %  Estimated Population (2008) 575.50 lakhs

 Received Rs.242.30 crores, 255.38 crores, 322.42 crores, 361.70 crores, 360.31 crores, 459.54 crores, 409.06 crores, 422.64 crores, 508.60 crores, 656.27 crores, 884.39 crores and 800.81 in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 11.48 %  Estimated Population (2008) 338.02 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 38,863

1,512 organisations received Rs.800.81 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.53 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.236.91 Average population per

organisation was 22,536 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 25.7 (an area approx 5 kms wide and 5.1 kms long)

LAKSHADWEEP (UT)

 Estimated Population (2008) 0.74 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 32

No foreign contribution was reported from Lakshadweep and Minicoy Islands

MADHYA PRADESH

 Received Rs.57.81 crores, 60.35 crores, 80.67 crores, 84.57 crores, 94.01 crores, 68.07 crores, 74.31 crores, 80.21 crores, 85.05 crores, 77.22 crores, 139.09 crores and 138.46 crores in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 8.26 %  Estimated Population (2008) 687.37 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 308,346

383 organisations received Rs.138.46 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.36 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.20.14 Average population per

organisation was 1,79,470 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 805.1 (an area approx 28 kms wide and 28.3 kms long)

MAHARASHTRA

 Received Rs.274.91 crores, 323.52 crores, 322.61 crores, 350.23 crores, 466.91 crores, 464.35 crores, 505.13 crores, 480.61 crores, 552.41 crores, 663.53 crores, 1,195.45 crores and 885.17 crores in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-

07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 11.22 %  Estimated Population (2008) 1079.72 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 307,713

1,515 organisations received Rs.885.17 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.58 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.81.98 Average population per

organisation was 71,269 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 203.11 (an area approx 14.2 kms wide and 14.2 kms long)

MANIPUR

 Received Rs.10.18 crores, 8.74 crores, 11.73 crores, 9.93 crores, 14.97 crores, 14.98 crores, 14.12 crores, 14.50 crores, 20.34 crores, 21.18 crores, 43.04 crores and 38.24 crores in 96-

97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 12.79 %  Estimated Population (2008) 23.64 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 22,327

268 organisations received Rs.38.24 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.14 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.161.76 Average population per

organisation was 8,821 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 83.31 (an area approx 9.1 kms wide and 9.1 kms long)

MEGHALAYA

 Received Rs.20.78 crores, 24.08 crores, 26.29 crores, 29.44 crores, 30.38 crores, 33.68 crores, 31.42 crores, 34.34 crores, 41.07 crores, 46.03 crores, 55.64 crores and 46.07 crores

in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 7.51 %  Estimated Population (2008) 25.30 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 22,429

109 organisations received Rs.46.07 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.42 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.182.09 Average population per

organisation was 23,211 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 205.8 (an area approx 14.3 kms wide and 14.3 kms long)

MIZORAM

 Received Rs.0.80 crores, 1.06 crores, 1.57 crores, 0.51 crores, 1.63 crores, 1.04 crores, 1.11 crores, 2.39 crores, 1.81 crores, 3.16 crores, 3.14 crores and 4.22 crores in 96-97, 97-

98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 16.35 %

 Estimated Population (2008) 9.7 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 21,081

29 organisations received Rs.4.22 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.15 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.43.51 Average population per organisation was 33,448 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 727 (an area approx 26.9 kms wide and 27 kms long)

NAGALAND

 Received Rs.4.35 crores, 5.25 crores, 6.62 crores, 7.59 crores, 9.11 crores, 12.24 crores, 14.25 crores, 9.70 crores, 16.35 crores, 18.87 crores, 26.65 crores and 32.09 crores in 96-97,

97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 19.92 %  Estimated Population (2008) 21.71 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 16,579

76 organisations received Rs.32.09 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.42 lakh each Average funds per person came to Rs.147.81 Average population per organisation was 28,566 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 218.14 (an area approx 14.8 kms wide and 14.8 kms long)

ORISSA

 Received Rs.56.05 crores, 56.95 crores, 68.52 crores, 111.65 crores, 114.61 crores, 107.62 crores, 87.67 crores, 93.39 crores, 101.86 crores, 128.95 crores, 216.46 crores and 177.05 crores in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 11.02 %  Estimated Population (2008) 396.55 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 155,707

1,048 organisations received Rs.177.05 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.17 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.44.65 Average population per

organisation was 37,839 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 148.6 (an area approx 12.1 kms wide and 12.1 kms long)

PONDICHERRY (UT)

 Received Rs.9.20 crores, 10.67 crores, 11.62 crores, 12.49 crores, 9.03 crores, 14.45 crores, 18.27 crores, 11.52 crores, 20.08 crores, 29.23 crores, 49.28 crores and 31.58 crores in 96-

97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 11.87 %  Estimated Population (2008) 12.04 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 492

68 organisations received Rs.31.58 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.46 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.262.29 Average population per

organisation was 17,706 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 7.24 (an area approx 2.7 kms wide and 2.7 kms long)

PUNJAB

 Received Rs.14.98 crores, 5.82 crores, 23.83 crores, 35.22 crores, 36.72 crores, 36.01 crores, 48.14 crores, 50.91 crores, 58.11 crores, 82.28 crores, 82.93 crores and 68.99 crores

in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 14.89 %  Estimated Population (2008) 267.22 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 50,362

83 organisations received Rs.68.99 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.83 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.25.82 Average population per

organisation was 3,21,952 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 606.8 (an area approx 24.6 kms wide and 24.7 kms long)

RAJASTHAN

 Received Rs.18.02 crores, 22.97 crores, 30.47 crores, 37.26 crores, 52.51 crores, 58.62 crores, 67.86 crores, 71.02 crores, 76.94 crores, 69.32 crores, 127.28 crores and 121.99 crores in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 18.99 %  Estimated Population (2008) 645.34 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 342,239

329 organisations received Rs.121.99 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.37 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.18.90 Average population per

organisation was 1,96,152 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 1040.24 (an area approx 32.25 kms wide and 32.25 kms long)

SIKKIM

 Received Rs.1.26 crores, 0.31 crores, 0.83 crores, 1.15 crores, 1.36 crores, 1.84 crores, 2.23 crores, 4.08 crores, 3.12 crores, 1.88 crores, 3.38 crores and 5.23 crores in 96-97, 97-

98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 13.85 %  Estimated Population (2008) 5.91 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 7,096

9 organisations received Rs.5.23 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.58 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.88.49 Average population per organisation was 65,667 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 788.4 (an area approx 28 kms wide and 28.1 kms long)

TAMIL NADU

 Received Rs.404.98 crores, 416.64 crores, 486.36 crores, 572.51 crores, 649.45 crores, 695.49 crores, 774.99 crores, 800.22 crores, 1,190.64 crores, 1,609.64 crores, 2,117.71 crores and 1670.93 in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 13.75 %  Estimated Population (2008) 661.06 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 130,058

2973 organisations received Rs.1670.93 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.56 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.252.77 Average population per

organisation was 22,235 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 43.75 (an area approx 6.6 kms wide and 6.6 kms long)

TRIPURA

 Received Rs.1.22 crores, 1.04 crores, 1.81 crores, 1.71 crores, 2.31 crores, 3.70 crores, 4.52 crores, 4.01 crores, 4.93 crores, 3.79 crores, 7.07 crores and 6.63 crores in 96-97, 97-

98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 16.66 %  Estimated Population (2008) 34.91 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 10,492

22 organizations received Rs.6.63 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.30 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.18.99 Average population per organisation was 1,58,682 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 476.91 (an area approx 21.8 kms wide and 21.8 kms long)

UTTAR PRADESH

 Received Rs.70.16 crores, 128.25 crores, 133.87 crores, 128.10 crores, 134.09 crores, 103.99 crores, 102.63 crores, 91.52 crores, 94.64 crores, 102.45 crores, 191.57 crores and 201.53 crores in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 10.07 %  Estimated Population (2008) 1902.54 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 236,286

937 organisations received Rs.201.53 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.22 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.10.59 Average population per

organisation was 2,03,046 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 295 (an area approx 17.2 kms wide and 17.2 kms long)

 Received Rs.158.28 crores, 168.88 crores, 216.42 crores, 233.99 crores, 256.79 crores, 256.13 crores, 272.48 crores, 290.67 crores, 339.73 crores, 355.31 crores, 515.33 crores and 540.91 crores in 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-00, 00-01, 01-02, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05, 05-06, 06-07, 07-08  Annual growth rate: 11.82 %  Estimated Population (2008) 869.95 lakhs  Land area (Sq K.M.) 88,752

1,657 organisations received Rs.540.91 crores in 07-08, or an average of Rs.33 lakhs each Average funds per person came to Rs.62.18 Average population per

organisation was 52,502 people Average area under each organisation (in sq k.m.) was 53.6 (an area approx 6.7 kms wide and 8 kms long)

NON-FOREIGN SOURCES R EF _ REF 2 4 8 7 6 96 0 0 \H \* ME RG EF OR MAT

Every dollar that comes into India as a grant does not automatically become foreign There are numerous exceptions to this For example, funds received from UN bodies

or from Indian citizens living abroad are not covered by FCRA REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT

NOTIFIED BY THE GOVERNMENT

Following organizations are not a ‘foreign source’ for purposes of FCRA Funds from them can be taken without FCRA approval This listing is based on the latest

notification REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT by Ministry of Home Affairs:

1 AARRO – Afro - Asian Rural Reconstruction Organization, New Delhi

2 ADB – African Development Bank, Abidjan

3 ADB – Asian Development Bank, Manila

4 APAARI – The Asia Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institution,

Bangkok

5 APCTT – Asia And Pacific Centre of Transfer of Technology, New Delhi

6 ACCU – Asia / Pacific Cultural Centre for UNESCO, Japan

7 Asian African Legal Consultative Committee, New Delhi

8 Asian and Pacific Development Administration, Kuala Lumpur

9 Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo

10 Bureau (Secretariat) of the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar), Gland,

Switzerland

11 CABI – Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux International, UK

12 CBD – Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal

13 CCD – Secretariat of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification

in Countries Experiencing Serious Drought / or Desertification, Especially in Africa, Bonn

14 CDB – Caribbean Development Bank, St Michael, Barbados

15 CGIAR – Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research,

Washington D.C

16 CGPRT Centre – The Regional Co-ordination Centre for Research and

Development of coarse Grains, Pulses, Roots, and Tuber crops in the Humid Tropics of Asia and the Pacific, Indonesia

17 CGRFA – Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Rome

18 CIAT – International Centre for Tropical Agriculture, Columbia

19 CIFOR – Centre for International Forestry Research, Indonesia

20 CIMMYT – International Wheat and Maize Improvement Centre, Mexico

21 CIRDAP – Centre on Integrated Rural Development for Asia and the Pacific,

Dhaka

22 CITES – Secretariat of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered

Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, Geneva

23 Commission on the Limit of the Continental Shelf, United Nations Divisions for

Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, New York

24 Commonwealth Secretariat, London

25 Department for Disarmament Affairs, New York

26 Department for General Assembly Affairs and Conference Services, New York

27 Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York

28 Department of Management, New York

29 Department of Peacekeeping Operations, New York

30 Department of Political Affairs, New York

31 Department of Public Information, New York

32 ECA – Economic Commission for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

33 ECE – Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva

34 ECLAC – Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago,

Chile

35 ESCAP – Economic Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand

36 ESCWA – Economic Commission for Western Asia, Beirut, Lebanon

37 European Community (EC)

38 FAO – Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome

39 Global Environment Facility, Washington D.C

40 IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

41 IBRD REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT – International Bank for Reconstruction and

Development, Washington D.C

42 ICAO – International Civil Aviation Organisation, Montreal

43 ICARDA – International Centre for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas, Syria

44 ICGEB – International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Bio - Technology,

New Delhi

45 ICGFI – International Consultative Group on Food Irradiation, Vienna

46 ICLARM – International Centre for Living Aquatic Resource Management,

Philippines

47 ICRAF – International Centre of Research in Agro-forestry, Nairobi

48 ICRISAT – International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics,

Hyderabad

49 ICSID – International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes,

Washington D.C

50 IDA – International Development Association, Washington D.C

51 IDB – Inter-American Development Bank, Washington D.C

52 IFAD – International Fund for Agricultural Development, Rome

53 IFC – International Finance Cooperation, Washington D.C.

54 IFPRI – International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington D.C

55 IIMI – International Irrigation Management Institute, Colombo

56 IITA – International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Nigeria

57 ILO – International Labour Organisation, Geneva

58 ILRI – International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi

59 IMF – International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C

60 IMI – International Water Management Institute, Srilanka

61 IMO – International Maritime Organisation, London

62 INCB – International Narcotics Control Board, Vienna

63 INSTRAW – International Research and Training Institute for Advancement of

Women, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic

64 International Potato Centre, Peru

65 International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines

66 International Seabed Authority, Kingston

67 International Sugar Organisation, London

68 International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, Hamburg

69 IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva

70 IPGRI – International Plant Genetic Resource Institute, Rome

71 ISNAR – International Service of National Agricultural Research, The

Netherlands

72 ISTA – The International Seeds Testing Association, Zurich

73 ITC – International Trade Centre (UNCTAD/ WTO), Geneva

74 ITU – International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

75 MIGA – Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, Washington D.C

76 NAM S&T Centre – Centre for Science and Technology of the Non - Aligned and

other Developing Countries, New Delhi

77 Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, New York

78 Office of Internal Oversight Services, New York

79 Office of Legal Affairs, New York

80 OHCHR – Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva

81 OPCW – Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, The Hague

82 Ozone Secretariat to the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone

Layer and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, Nairobi

83 PTS for CTBTO – Provisional Technical Secretariat for the Comprehensive

Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organisation, Vienna

84 RNAM – The Regional Network for Agriculture Machinery, Bangkok

85 Secretariat of the Basel Convention on the Control of Trans-boundary

Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal, Geneva

86 UNAIDS – Joint United Nations Programme on HIV / AIDS, Geneva

87 UNCDF – United Nations Capital Development Fund, New York

88 UNCTAD – United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva

89 UNDCP – United Nations International Drug Control Programme, Vienna

90 UNDP – United Nations Development Programme, New York

91 UNEP – United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi

92 UNEP / CMS Secretariat of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory

Species of Wild Animals (CMS or Bonn Convention), Bonn

93 UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation,

Paris

94 UNFCCC – Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on

Climate Change, Bonn

95 UNFPA – United Nations Population Fund, New York

96 UNHCHR – Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva

97 UNHCR – Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva

98 UNICEF – United Nations Children’s Fund, New York

99 UNICRI – United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute,

Rome

100 UNIDIR – United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, Geneva

101 UNIDO – United Nations Industrial Development Organisation, Vienna

102 UNIFEM – United Nations Development Fund for Women, New York

103 UNITAR – United Nations Institute for Training and Research, Geneva

104 United Nations Office at Geneva

105 United Nations Office at Nairobi

106 United Nations Office at Vienna

107 United Nations Outer Space Committee

108 UNOPS – United Nations Office for Project Services, New York

109 UNRISD – United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva

110 UNRWA – United Nations Relief and work Agency for Palestine Refugees in the

Near East, Ghaza And Aman

111 UNSCO – United Nations Statistical Office

112 UNSDRI – United Nations Social Defence Research Institute

113 UNU – United Nations University, Tokyo

114 UNV – United Nations Volunteers, Bonn

115 UPO REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT – Universal Postal Union, Berne, Switzerland

116 UPOV – International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants,

Geneva

117 WARDA – West Africa Development Association, Abidjan

118 WFC – World Food Council

119 WFP – World Food Programme, Rome

120 WHO – World Health Organisation, Geneva

121 WIPO – World Intellectual Property Organisation, Geneva

122 WMO – World Metrological Organisation, Geneva

123 WTO / OMT – World Tourism Organisation, Madrid

OTHER NON-FOREIGN SOURCES

The MHA notification has been issued under section 2(1)(e)(ii) It includes 123

organisations, both from the UN system as also other international organisations.This raises a question What about those UN organisations which are not listed in the notification? Do these become foreign sources?

We don’t think so Apparently, UN and its specialized agencies are automatically excluded from the definition of ‘foreign source’ Under section 2(1)(e)(ii), the

Central Government is required to notify only ‘other agencies’ as non-foreign

Following is a list of UN offices and its agencies which are not included in the MHA notification Please confirm their status with MHA before treating these as non-foreign

1 ACABQ – Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions, New York (note 2)

2 Ad Hoc Inter – agency Meeting on Women – New York (note 3)

3 Administrative Committee on Coordination (ACC REF _Ref248769600 \h \* MERGEFORMAT ) - New York (note 3)

4 CCAQ (FB) – Consultative Committee on Administrative Questions (Financial and Budgetary Questions) - Geneva (note 3)

5 CCAQ (PER) – Consultative Committee on Administrative Questions (Personnel and General Administrative Questions) - Geneva (note 3)

6 CCPOQ – Consultative Committee on Programme and Operational Questions – Geneva (note 3)

7 EDI – Economic Development Institute, Washington (note 4)

8 IACSD – Inter - agency Committee on Sustainable Development - New York (note 3)

9 IAMLADP – Inter - agency Meeting on Language Arrangements, Documentation and Publications, New York (note 3)

10 IBE – International Bureau of Education - Geneva (note 1)

11 ICC – International Computing Centre - Geneva (note 3)

12 ICJ – International Court of Justice - The Hague (note 2)

13 ICS – International Centre for Science and High Technology - Trieste, Italy (note 1)

14 ICSC – International Civil Service Commission - New York (note 2)

15 ILO / ITC – International Training Centre - Turin, Italy (note 1)

16 IMF Institute [part of IMF; exempt u/s 2(e)(ii)]

17 ISCC – Information Systems Coordination Committee - Geneva (note 3)

18 JIAMCATT – Joint Inter - agency Meeting on Computer - assisted Translation and Terminology - Geneva (note 3)

19 JIU – Joint Inspection Unit - Geneva (note 2)

20 JUNIC – Joint United Nations Information Committee - New York (note 3)

21 OOSA – Office for Outer Space Affairs - Vienna (note 2)

22 Organisational Committee of ACC - New York (note 3)

23 UNCC – United Nations Compensation Commission - Geneva (note 2)

24 UNCHS (Habitat) – United Nations Centre for Human Settlements - Nairobi (note 2)

25 UNCITRAL – United Nations Commission on International Trade Law - Vienna (note 2)

26 United Nations Board of Auditors - New York (note 2)

27 UNJSPF – United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund - New York, USA (note 2)

28 UNSC – United Nations Staff College - Turin, Italy (note 2)

Notes:

1 Specialized Agency of UN [sec 2(e)(ii)]

2 Part of UN: a Program [sec 2(e)(ii)]

3 Part of UN (Inter - Agency Coordination) [sec 2(e)(ii)]

4 Part of World Bank [sec 2(e)(ii)]

FOREIGN SOURCES R EF _ REF 2 4 8 7 6 96 0 0 \H \* ME RG EF OR MAT

There are agencies which have names similar to UN agencies This sometimes causes confusion The list provided here includes some names of such organizations It also includes names of other NGOs / agencies which would be treated as a foreign source under FCRA

This is merely an illustrative list There are probably hundreds of other sources which would all be foreign

Also remember that some of the grants from Indian Agencies such as CAPART,

Concern India Foundation, National Foundation for India, CRY – Child Relief & You, IGSSS, etc may be covered under FCRA

1 Academic Council on the United Nations System (note 5)

2 Action Aid, UK (note 6)

3 Advocates for Youth, USA (note 3)

4 Aga Khan Foundation, New Delhi / Switzerland (note 2)

5 ALM International, USA (note 3)

6 Asia Foundation, USA (note 3)

7 Asia Society, USA (note 3)

8 Asian Relief, USA (note 3)

9 BRAC, Dhaka (note 3)

10 British Airways (note 4)

11 Business Council for the U.N., USA (note 3)

12 Canadian International Development Agency – CIDA (note 2)

13 CARE International, USA (note 5)

14 Caritas Internationalis (International Confederation of Catholic Charities)

(note 6)

15 Catalyst for Women, USA (note 3)

16 Catholic Relief Services - United States Catholic Conference, Inc (note 6)

17 Childhelp USA, USA (note 3)

18 Childreach, USA (note 3)

19 Children Incorporated, USA (note 3)

20 Children International, USA (note 2)

21 Children’s Aid International, USA (note 2)

22 Children’s Critical Care Alliance, USA (note 3)

23 Children’s Defense Fund, USA (note 3)

24 Children’s Mercy Fund, USA (note 3)

25 Children’s Survival Fund, USA (note 3)

26 Children’s Wish Foundation Intl., USA (note 3)

27 Christian Aid (note 2)

28 Christian Children’s Fund, Inc (note 6)

29 Christian Record Services, USA (note 3)

30 Christian Relief Services, USA (note 2)

31 Church World Service, Inc (note 6)

32 Commonwealth Human Ecology Council (CHEC) (note 6)

33 Community Aid Abroad (CAA), Australia (note 2)

34 Compassion International, USA (note 2)

35 Concern Worldwide (U.S.), Inc., USA (note 3)

36 Conservation International Fdn., USA (note 3)

37 Council of Europe (note 7)

38 DANIDA, New Delhi / Denmark (note 2)

39 David Livingstone Missionary Fdn., USA (note 3)

40 Defenders of Wildlife, USA (note 3)

41 DFID (earlier called ODA), UK (note 2)

42 Diakonia, Sweden (note 2)

43 Direct Relief International, USA (note 2)

44 Earth Island Institute, USA (note 3)

45 Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund, USA (note 3)

46 Environmental Action Foundation, USA (note 3)

47 European Commission (Directorate-General XIII) (note 7)

48 European Union (note 7)

49 EZE, Germany (note 2)

50 Families International, USA (note 3)

51 Food for the Hungry, USA (note 3)

52 Ford Foundation, USA (note 2)

53 Foreign Embassies, all

54 Foreigners (whether living in India or abroad)

55 Foundation for the Support of the United Nations, Inc (note 5)

56 Freedom From Hunger, USA (note 2)

57 Friends of the Earth, USA (note 3)

58 Fund for an Open Society, USA (note 3)

59 Fund for Animals, USA (note 3)

60 Fund for Peace, USA (note 3)

61 G7 Support Implementation Group - Moscow, Russia (note 7)

62 Gifts In Kind International, USA (note 2)

63 Global 2000 (note 5)

64 Global Fund for Women (note 6)

65 Greenpeace Fund, USA (note 3)

66 Habitat for Humanity International, USA (note 3)

67 Heifer Project International, USA (note 2)

68 Helen Keller International, USA (note 3)

69 HelpAge International (note 5)

70 Heritage Foundation, USA (note 3)

71 Hewlett Packard (note 4)

72 Hunger Project, USA (note 3)

73 IBM (note 4)

74 Institute of International Education, USA (note 3)

75 InterAction: American Council for Voluntary International Action, USA (note 3)

76 INTERMON (note 6)

77 International Air Transport Association (IATA) - Geneva, Switzerland and

Montreal, Canada (note 3)

78 International Christian Aid (note 2)

79 International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - Geneva, Switzerland (note

3)

80 International Cooperative Alliance (note 5)

81 International Council for Adult Education (ICAE) (note 5)

82 International Council of Voluntary Agencies (ICVA) (note 5)

83 International Council of Women (note 5)

84 International Council on Social Welfare (note 5)

85 International Federation of Associations of the Elderly (FIAPA) (note 5)

86 International Federation of Business and Professional Women (note 5)

87 International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies -

Geneva, Switzerland (note 3)

88 International Federation Terre Des Hommes (note 6)

89 International Finance Corporation (IFC), Washington (note 1)

90 International Fund for Animal Welfare, USA (note 3)

91 International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (Unidroit) Rome,

Italy (note 7)

92 International Institute of Rural Reconstruction, USA (note 3)

93 International Movement ATD Fourth World (note 5)

94 International Organization for Migration (IOM) - Geneva, Switzerland (note 7)

95 International Organization for Standardization (ISO) - Geneva, (note 5)

96 International Organization of Employers (note 5)

97 International Save the Children Alliance (note 5)

98 International Social Security Association (ISSA) (note 5)

99 International Youth and Student Movement for the United Nations (ISMUN)

(note 5)

100 Inter-parliamentary Union - Geneva, Switzerland (note 7)

101 Just Say No International, USA (note 3)

102 Local Initiatives Support Corporation, USA (note 3)

103 Lutheran World Federation (note 6)

104 MacArthur Foundation (note 2)

105 Make-A-Wish Fdn of America, USA (note 2)

106 MAP International (note 3)

107 Microsoft (note 4)

108 Miserior (note 2)

109 Motorola (note 4)

110 Muslim World League (note 5)

111 Netherlands Organization for International Development Cooperation (note 6)

112 Nippon International Cooperation for Community Development (note 6)

113 NORAD (note 2)

114 NOVIB (note 2)

115 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) – Paris,

France (note 7)

116 Organization for International Economic Relations (IER) (note 6)

117 Organizations and Women’s Groups of German Associations, E.V (note 6)

118 Overseas Development Council, USA (note 3)

119 Oxfam America, Boston (note 6)

120 Oxfam (United Kingdom) (note 6)

121 Oxfam Hong kong (note 2)

122 Partners of the Americas, USA (note 3)

123 Pathfinder International, USA (note 3)

124 Pearl S Buck Foundation, USA (note 3)

125 People-to-People International, USA (note 3)

126 PLAN International, USA (note 2)

127 Population Action International, USA (note 2)

128 Priority One International (note 3)

129 Project Concern International, USA (note 3)

130 Project Cure, USA (note 3)

131 Project Hope, USA (note 3)

132 Resources for the Future, USA (note 3)

133 Save the Children Federation, USA (note 2)

134 SOS – Kinderdorf International (note 6)

135 SOS Drugs International (note 6)

136 Swedish International Development Agency (Sida) (note 2)

137 Swiss Aid (note 2)

138 Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (note 2)

139 Terre Des Hommes (note 2)

140 U.S Committee for Refugees, USA (note 3)

141 U.S Committee for UNICEF, USA (note 3)

142 U.S Olympic Committee, USA (note 3)

143 UN Association of the U.S.A., USA (note 3)

144 Unitarian Universalist Service Committee, USA (note 2)

145 United Children’s Fund, USA (note 3)

146 United Way of America, USA (note 3)

147 USAID, USA (note 2)

148 USO (United Service Organizations), USA (note 3)

149 Wildlife Preservation Trust Intl., USA (note 3)

150 Women’s International Democratic Federation (note 5)

151 World Assembly of Youth (WAY) (note 5)

152 World Concern, USA (note 3)

153 World Education, USA (note 3)

154 World Emergency Relief, USA (note 3)

155 World Federation of UNESCO Clubs, Centres and Associations (note 6)

156 World Federation of United Nations Associations (WFUNA) (note 5)

157 World Learning Inc., USA (note 3)

158 World Mercy Fund, USA (note 3)

159 World Neighbors, USA (note 3)

160 World Resources Institute, USA (note 3)

161 World Trade Organization (WTO) - Geneva, Switzerland (note 7)

162 World University Service (note 6)

163 World Vision International (note 6)

164 World Wide Fund for Nature International (note 5)

165 World Young Women’s Christian Association (note 6)

166 Worldwide Network - Women in Development and Environment (note 5)

167 Room to Read, USA