Suzuki, we show strong convergence theorems of the CQ method for nonexpansive semigroups in Hilbert spaces by hybrid method in the mathematical programming.. In 2005, Xu [4] established
Trang 1Volume 2007, Article ID 59735, 8 pages
doi:10.1155/2007/59735
Research Article
Strong Convergence Theorems of the CQ Method for
Nonexpansive Semigroups
Huimin He and Rudong Chen
Received 25 January 2007; Accepted 19 March 2007
Recommended by Jerzy Jezierski
Motivated by T Suzuki, we show strong convergence theorems of the CQ method for nonexpansive semigroups in Hilbert spaces by hybrid method in the mathematical programming The results presented extend and improve the corresponding results of Kazuhide Nakajo and Wataru Takahashi (2003)
Copyright © 2007 H He and R Chen This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
1 Introduction and preliminaries
Throughout this paper, letH be a real Hilbert space with inner product ·,·and · We usex n x to indicate that the sequence { x n }converges weakly tox Similarly, x n → x will
symbolize strong convergence we denote byNandR +the sets of nonnegative integers and nonnegative real numbers, respectively letC be a closed convex subset of a Hilbert
spaceH, and Let T : C → C be a nonexpansive mapping (i.e., Tx − T y ≤ x − y for allx, y ∈ C) We use Fix(T) to denote the set of fixed points of T; that is, Fix(T) = { x ∈
C : x = Tx } We know that Fix(T) is nonempty if C is bounded, for more details see [1]
In [2], Shioji and Takahashi introduce in a Hilbert space the implicit iteration
x n = α n u +
1− α n1
t n
t n
0 T(s)x n ds, n ∈ N, (1.1) Where{ α n }is a sequence in (0,1),{ t n }is a sequence of positive real numbers divergent to
∞, for eacht ≥0 andu ∈ C In 2003, Suzuki [3] is the first to introduce again in a Hilbert space the following implicit iteration process:
x n = α n u +
1− α n
T
t n
x n
Trang 2for the nonexpansive semigroup case In 2005, Xu [4] established a Banach space version
of the sequence (1.2) of Suzuki [3], he proved that ifE is a uniformly convex Banach space
with a weakly continuous duality map (e.g.,l pfor 1< p < ∞), ifC is a closed convex
sub-set ofE, and if { T(t) : t ∈ R+}is a nonexpansive semigroup on a closed convex subset
C such that Fix(T) , then under certain appropriate assumptions made and the se-quencesα nandt nof the parameters, he showed that the sequencex nimplicitly defined
by (1.2) for alln ≥1 converges strongly to a member ofF =t ≥0Fix(T(t)).
Recently, Chen and He [5] extend and improve the corresponding results of Suzuki [3], ifE is a reflexive Banach space which admits a weakly sequentially continuous duality
mappingJ from E to E ∗, supposeC is a nonempty closed convex subset of E Let { T(t) :
t ∈ R+}be a nonexpansive semigroup onC such that F(T) , and f : C → C is a fixed
contraction onC Let { α n }and{ t n }be sequences of real numbers satisfying 0< α n < 1,
tn > 0 and limn →∞ tn =limn →∞ αn/tn =0 Define a sequence{ xn }inC by
x n = α n f
x n
+
1− α n
T
t n
x n
Then{ x n }converges strongly toq, as n → ∞.q is the element of F, such that q is the
unique solution inF to the following variational inequality:
(f − I)q, j(x − q)
Some other results can be seen in [6–8]
Nakajo and Takahashi [9] introduced an iteration procedure for nonexpansive self-mappingsT on C as follows:
x0= x ∈ C,
yn = αnxn+
1− αn
Txn,
Cn =z ∈ C; yn − z ≤ xn − z ,
Qn =z ∈ C;
xn − z,x0− xn
≥0 ,
xn+1 = PC n ∩ Q n
x0
(1.5)
for eachn ∈ N ∪ {0}, whereαn ∈[0,a] for some a ∈[0, 1), and{ xn }converges strongly
toPFix(T) x0
Let{ T(t) : t ∈ R+}be a nonexpansive semigroup on a closed convex subsetC of a
Hilbert spaceH, that is,
(1) for eacht ∈ R+,T(t) is a nonexpansive mapping on C;
(2)T(0)x = x for all x ∈ C;
(3)T(s + t) = T(s) ◦ T(t) for all s,t ∈ R+;
(4) for each x ∈ X, the mapping T( ·)x fromR +intoC is continuous We put F =
t ≥0Fix(T(t)) We know that F is nonempty if C is bounded, see [10]
LetC be a nonempty closed convex subset of H and let { T(t) : t ∈ R+}be a nonex-pansive semigroup on a closed convex subsetC of a Hilbert space H such that F ,
Trang 3Nakajo and Takahashi [9] also introduced an iteration procedure for nonexpansive semi-group{ T(t) : t ∈ R+}onC as follows:
x0= x ∈ C,
y n = α n x n+
1− α n1
t n
t n
0 T(s)x n ds,
Cn =z ∈ C; yn − z ≤ xn − z ,
Q n =z ∈ C;
x n − z,x0− x n
≥0 ,
x n+1 = P C n ∩ Q n
x0
(1.6)
for eachn ∈ N ∪ {0}, whereα n ∈[0,a] for some a ∈[0, 1) and { t n } is a positive real number divergent sequence, and the sequence{ xn }converges strongly toPFx0
In 2006, Martinez-Yanes and Xu [11] employ Nakajo-Takahashi [9] idea and prove some strong convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings and maximal monotone operators
In this paper, we consider an iteration procedure for nonexpansive semigroups{ T(t) :
t ∈ R+}onC as follows:
x0= x ∈ C,
yn = αnxn+
1− αn
T
tn
xn,
Cn =z ∈ C; yn − z ≤ xn − z ,
Qn =z ∈ C;
xn − z,x0− xn
≥0 ,
xn+1 = PC n ∩ Q n
x0
(1.7)
for eachn ∈ N ∪ {0}, whereαn ∈[0,a] for some a ∈[0, 1) andtn ≥0 limn →∞ tn =0 then the sequence{ x n }converges strongly toP F x0
In the sequel, we will need the following definitions and results
Definition 1.1 A Banach space E is said to satisfy Opial’s condition [12] if whenever{ xn }
is a sequence inE which converges weakly to x, as n → ∞, then
lim sup
n →∞
xn − x < limsup
n →∞
xn − y , ∀ y ∈ E with x y. (1.8)
It is well known that Hilbert space andl p(1< l < ∞) space satisfy Opial’s condition [13]
Lemma 1.2 [14] Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Hilbert space H Given
x ∈ H and y ∈ C, then y = P C x if and only if x − y, y − z ≥ 0, is satisfied for all z ∈ C.
Lemma 1.3 [14,15] Every Hilbert space H has Radon-Riesz property or Kadets-Klee prop-erty, that is, for a sequence { xn } ⊂ H with xn x and xn → x , then there holds xn → x.
Trang 42 Main results
Lemma 2.1 Let C be a closed convex subset of a Hilbert space H Let { T(t) : t ∈ R+} be a nonexpansive semigroup on C such that F , and the sequence { xn } generated by (1.7), where α n ∈[0,a] for some a ∈ [0, 1), Then { x n } is well defined and F ⊂ C n ∩ Q n for every
n ∈ N ∪ {0}
Proof It is obvious that Cnis closed andQnis closed and convex for everyn ∈ N ∪ {0}
It follows from thatCnis convex for everyn ∈ N ∪ {0}because yn − z ≤ xn − z is equivalent to
y
n − x n 2
+ 2
y n − x n,x n − z
So,C n ∩ Q nis closed and convex for everyn ∈ N ∪ {0} Letu ∈ F Then from
y
n − u = α n x n+
1− α n
T
t n
x n − u
≤ α n x
n − u +
1− α n T
t n
x n − u
we haveu ∈ C nfor eachn ∈ N ∪ {0} So, we haveF ⊂ C nfor alln ∈ N ∪ {0}
Next, we show by mathematical induction that{ xn }is well defined andF ⊂ Cn ∩ Qn
for everyn ∈ N ∪ {0} Forn =0, we havex0= x ∈ C and Q0= C, and hence F ⊂ C0∩ Q0 Suppose thatx k is given and F ⊂ C k ∩ Q k for some k ∈ N ∪ {0}.There exists a unique elementxk+1 ∈ Ck ∩ Qk such thatxk+1 = PC k ∩ Q k(x0) Fromxk+1 = PC k ∩ Q k(x0), it holds that
xk+1 − z,x0− xk+1
for eachz ∈ Ck ∩ Qk SinceF ⊂ Ck ∩ Qk, we getF ⊂ Qk+1, therefore we haveF ⊂ Ck+1 ∩
Q k+1
Lemma 2.2 Let C be a closed convex subset of a Hilbert space H Let { T(t) : t ∈ R+} be a nonexpansive semigroup on C such that F , and the sequence { xn } generated by (1.7), where α n ∈[0,a] for some a ∈ [0, 1), Then lim n →∞ x n+1 − x n = 0.
Proof At first, we show that F is a closed convex subset of C Since T(t) : C → C, t > 0 is
nonexpansive, we claim thatF is closed In fact, if p n ⊂ F =t ≥0Fix(T(t)), n ≥1, such that limn →∞ pn = p, then we have
T(t)p =lim
n →∞ T(t)pn =lim
Thusp ∈ F.
Next, we show thatF is convex, we will use the following identity in Hilbert space:
tx + (1 − t)y 2
= t x 2+ (1− t) y 2− t(1 − t) x − y 2, (2.5)
Trang 5which holds for allx, y ∈ H and for all t ∈[0, 1] indeed,
tx + (1 − t)y 2
= t2 x 2+ (1− t)2 y 2+ 2t(1 − t) x, y
= t x 2+ (1− t) y 2+ 2t(1 − t) x, y
− t(1 − t) x 2− t(1 − t) y 2
= t x 2+ (1− t) y 2− t(1 − t)
x 2+ y 2−2 x, y
= t x 2+ (1− t) y 2− t(1 − t) x − y 2.
(2.6)
Letp1,p2∈ F and for all t ∈[0, 1],p = tp1+ (1− t)p2, then
p − p1=(1− t)
p2− p1
, p − p2=(1− t)
p1− p2
From (2.5) and (2.7), we have
p − T(t)p 2
= t
p1− T(t)p
+ (1− t)
p2− T(t)p 2
= t p1− T(t)p 2
+ (1− t) p2− T(t)p 2
− t(1 − t) p1− p2 2
≤ t p1− p 2
+ (1− t) p2− p 2
− t(1 − t) p1− p2 2
= t(1 − t)2 p1− p2 2
+t2(1− t) p1− p2 2
− t(1 − t) p1− p2 2
= t(1 − t)(1 − t + t −1) p1− p2 2
=0.
(2.8)
Thusp = T(t)p, for all t > 0, that is, p ∈ F.
Secondly, we show that{ xn }is bounded SinceF is a nonempty closed convex subset
ofC, there exists a unique element z0∈ F such that z0= PF(x0) From xn+1 = PC n ∩ Q n(x0),
we have
x
n+1 − x0 ≤ z − x0 ∀ z ∈ C n ∩ Q n (2.9)
It follows fromLemma 2.1thatF ⊂ Cn ∩ Qnfor everyn ∈ N ∪ {0}, together withz0∈
F(T), we have
xn+1 − x0 ≤ z0− x0 ∀ n ∈ N ∪ {0} (2.10)
This implies that{ x n }is bounded, so{ T(t)x n }is also bounded, and moreover so is
{ yn }since yn ≤ αn xn + (1− αn) T(t)xn
Thirdly, we show that xn+1 − xn →0 asn → ∞ SinceQn = { z ∈ C; xn − z,x0− xn ≥
0},x n = P Q n(x0) Asx n+1 ∈ C n ∩ Q n ⊂ Q n, we obtain
x
n+1 − x0 ≥ x n − x0 , ∀ z ∈ C
Trang 6Therefore the sequence{ xn − x0}is bounded and nondecreasing So
lim
On the other hand, fromx n+1 ∈ Q n, we get x n − x n+1,x0− x n ≥0, and hence
xn − xn+1 2
= xn − x0
−xn+1 − x0 2
= x
n − x0 2
−2
x n − x0,x n+1 − x0
+ x
n+1 − x0 2
= x n − x0 2
+ x n+1 − x0 2
−2
xn − x0,xn+1 − xn+xn − x0
= x
n+1 − x0 2
− x
n − x0 2
−2
x n − x n+1,x0− x n
≤ x n+1 − x0 2
− x n − x0 2
−→0 (n −→ ∞).
(2.13)
So
lim
Theorem 2.3 Let C be a closed convex subset of a Hilbert space H Let { T(t) : t ∈ R+}
be a nonexpansive semigroup on C such that F , and the sequence { xn } generated by (1.7), where α n ∈[0,a] for some a ∈ [0, 1), and t n ≥0 limn →∞ t n = 0 then the sequence
{ xn } converges strongly to PFx0.
Proof It follows from xn+1 ∈ Cnthat
T
tn
xn − xn = 1
1− αn yn − xn
≤ 1
1− α n y n − x n+1 + x
n+1 − x n
≤ 2
1− αn xn+1 − xn
(2.15)
for everyn ∈ N ∪ {0} ByLemma 2.2, we get T(tn)xn − xn →0
We claim that{ x n } is relatively sequentially compact Indeed, there exists a weakly convergence subsequence{ xn j } ⊆ { xn } by reflexivity ofH and boundedness of the
se-quence{ xn }, now we supposexn j x ∈ C( j → ∞) Now we show thatx ∈ F Put xj = xn j,
β j = α n j, ands j = t n j forj ∈ N, lets j ≥0 be such that
s j −→0, T
sj
xj − x j
Trang 7Fixt > 0, from
x
j − T(t)x ≤[t/sj]−1
k =0
T
(k + 1)s j
x j − T
ks j
x j
+ T t sj
sj
x j − T t
s j
sj
x + T
t/s j
sj
x − T(t)x
≤ t
s j
T
sj
x j − xj + x j − x + Tt − t
s j
s j
x − x
≤ t T
s j
x j − x j
s j + x
j − x + max T(s)x − x : 0≤ s ≤ s
j
(2.17)
For allj ∈ N ∪ {0}, as every Hilbert space satisfies Opial’s condition, then we have
lim sup
j →∞
x j − T(t)x ≤lim sup
j →∞
xj − x .
(2.18) This implies thatT(t)x = x Therefore,
Ifz0= PF(x0), it follows from (2.10), (2.19), and the lower semicontinuity of the norm that
x0− z0 ≤ x0− x ≤lim inf
j →∞ x0− xn
j ≤lim sup
j →∞
x0− xn
j ≤ x0− z0 . (2.20)
Thus, we obtain
lim
j →∞ x n
j − x0 = x0− x = x0− z0 . (2.21)
This implies that
This shows that{ xn }is relatively sequentially compact Therefore, we havexn → z0
Acknowledgment
This work is partially supported by the National Science Foundation of China, Grant 10471033
Trang 8[1] F E Browder, “Fixed-point theorems for noncompact mappings in Hilbert space,” Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol 53, no 6, pp 1272–1276,
1965.
[2] N Shioji and W Takahashi, “Strong convergence theorems for asymptotically nonexpansive
semigroups in Hilbert spaces,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol 34, no 1, pp 87–99, 1998.
[3] T Suzuki, “On strong convergence to common fixed points of nonexpansive semigroups in
Hilbert spaces,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol 131, no 7, pp 2133–2136,
2003.
[4] H.-K Xu, “A strong convergence theorem for contraction semigroups in Banach spaces,” Bulletin
of the Australian Mathematical Society, vol 72, no 3, pp 371–379, 2005.
[5] R Chen and H He, “Viscosity approximation of common fixed points of nonexpansive
semi-groups in Banach space,” to appear in Applied Mathematics Letters.
[6] R Chen and Z Zhu, “Viscosity approximation fixed points for nonexpansive andm-accretive
operators,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol 2006, Article ID 81325, 10 pages, 2006.
[7] R Chen, Y Song, and H Zhou, “Convergence theorems for implicit iteration process for a
fi-nite family of continuous pseudocontractive mappings,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and
Applications, vol 314, no 2, pp 701–709, 2006.
[8] Y Yao and R Chen, “Iterative algorithm for approximating solutions of maximal monotone
operators in Hilbert spaces,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol 2007, Article ID 32870, 8
pages, 2007.
[9] K Nakajo and W Takahashi, “Strong convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings and
nonexpansive semigroups,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol 279, no 2,
pp 372–379, 2003.
[10] F E Browder, “Nonexpansive nonlinear operators in a Banach space,” Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol 54, no 4, pp 1041–1044, 1965.
[11] C Martinez-Yanes and H.-K Xu, “Strong convergence of the CQ method for fixed point
itera-tion processes,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol 64, no 11, pp 2400–2411, 2006.
[12] Z Opial, “Weak convergence of the sequence of successive approximations for nonexpansive
mappings,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol 73, pp 591–597, 1967.
[13] K Yanagi, “On some fixed point theorems for multivalued mappings,” Pacific Journal of
Mathe-matics, vol 87, no 1, pp 233–240, 1980.
[14] R E Megginson, An Introduction to Banach Space Theory, vol 183 of Graduate Texts in
Mathe-matics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
[15] W Takahashi, Nonlinear Functional Analysis Fixed Point Theory and Its Applications, Yokohama
Publishers, Yokohama, Japan, 2000.
Huimin He: Department of Mathematics, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300160, China
Email address:hehuimin20012000@yahoo.com.cn
Rudong Chen: Department of Mathematics, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300160, China
Email address:chenrd@tjpu.edu.cn
...[9] K Nakajo and W Takahashi, ? ?Strong convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings and< /small>
nonexpansive semigroups, ” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications,...
[12] Z Opial, “Weak convergence of the sequence of successive approximations for nonexpansive< /small>
mappings,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol 73,...
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol 53, no 6, pp 1272–1276,
1965.
[2] N Shioji and W Takahashi, ? ?Strong convergence