Báo cáo nghiên cứu nông nghiệp " Research Priority Setting Workshop Agriculture Sector " docx

I N€€d tolink l€*arch intoGoV Rural D€v€lopment Outcomes thrcuah pdidins tansible b€nefits t There b a difreren.e between the Outpub of research and the research 3Fategi€s or inputs inb

Key Issues

' Gdernhent ofvietnam wdts gwth it.g.iculture! ontribution to GDPand dport3' Resedh an fu.ther ontribute to imp@ing.odpetitive.ess ofvielnam's agriculture sector

I Good policies and priontiessetthe eNircnment foreconomi & r*.rch management reform

! Prioriti€s paide.fcur to impa€ theefr€.tiv€nes (impact) or investm€nt in res€flh -focus on wh€re the m.jor b€nents will come frcm

t A difiicult ta.k so need to break it ddn so that it isundeBtddable and manageabre

Key Issues lcontirued)

' Prioriti$ focus fi6ton outputs (i.e.Brcad Pbduct

of Them.tic Are )

I N€€d tolink l€*arch intoGoV Rural D€v€lopment

Outcomes thrcuah pdidins tansible b€nefits

t There b a difreren.e between the Outpub of

research and the research 3Fategi€s or inputs inb

t The qustion is wh.t output3 could the rese.rch

stratqier be applied to siv€ the sreate* impac:

' On.e Outplts prio.itised need to ddelop Output

obiectivesand ttulti-di*iplinrtreseffih pbgrams

I Prioiity Setting lethodologt

r Pre.€nt tion of Datr & Inlo.mation and S*torAnalFis

I Priority S€ttins: Workins Grcups Scorina usina

t Summat& Closure

workshop obj€ctives

, Io dsln/VltRD to d.Er+ me.hdrism &r

d€t€rniring dgri<ultuE reredt.h Ptlotirlzs ds d hatit

for iryenm.nr t isions for high pdomy d4.i.ukurc

re*drch prcaEEs ond prej€<.r,

I To p.cporc o <tftfr tet of rc*orch ptio.ities rhe

oqtkltture tecror utins obje.rire ond tubi.crie.to.a

on.l infonatioa an t rerulB ofPftviols P onty

setrina rcr|(Jh+s d tn€ sr6se.to ,€v€t

-Priority Setting Methodology

t Used wid€lt in m.ny ds€lopins nd ddeloped' Beed on 4 Independent Crir.ri, for evaluarion of, eotential Benefib{Hdbiced hd murhl)

r Abilityto captur€ aen€fits (H@ easyto adoptr), Rseaf.h ?or€rtiar (5 it a

r ReseaEh Careity (Oo we have the rkillsl)

I Th€ 4 riteri form the Priority S€ttina

Pdorities Framework

AREAS OF RESEARCII OPPORTUNITY

Fed Frccarnr & con,smlon

R{ae, Nonr'mber Fo;'t tldud' Bre.di;{'q ed cotr.n*pn,

Mu{.nN & con;;rren, {d

ASSESSING POTDNTTAL BDNEFTTS

! Potential Benefits E red n.xinun o.Llkioncl henefiE

fot vi.rnc6 (Eononic, enuircnn ntot, ond so.ict) fron

t Potential benefits increase

The ldter the economic A'qth (prcdu.tion and

, Opportunitig for in.EG.d erports dd/o import

, Tho grcat.f th€ reduction in cosB

lhe higher the aearch intenlity

Th€ aEat.r th€ positiv .nvircnmenel dd soci.l

Score Pot€ntial Bere{its

I Step | - Frcm lour p€rson.l vis sel*t th€ hish€st

AROS and then the lMest

) Step 2- S.ore the HIGHEsTARO 7,dd the

LOWEST ARO I Finall, score the MEDIU M ARO'S

using'.ores3 and 5 ft h.tth Mtudton b6danh

rr ohdyo drtlnrcr t.Md eot e d id 0&d ol xd4 h

I A3srme that there will be few obstacles ina.hiding the mdimum potential

! l,lake an ss€ssm€nt of the compeative totalvalue oftJje* potenti.l benefitr for e&h ARO

Factors For & Against Achleveuent of

Porential Benefits {or Likellhooal ofUprake)

' Procedure: Trble grclps

Benetrb:.riing rrom e,( h Axo u

th€ poEnti.r lor erhAROin r€rms otrj

b€nent (rarm€6) & 6,e rircry iFd of doption

, rbenti.r oorid.ar or dnininr.tive ditn.ub or 6€ of

Thehi€herrdfastertheadoptionrate' The morc e-ily ben€fitt aE re.oCnised, The morc frvour.ble Bd.mment poli.i€sand, th€ morc effe.tiye the denlion sFtem Th€ high€ th res*h int.n.ity and ld€l of The h'Aher the inFm*ional omper itivene\r 'n iride

score Likelihood of Uptake) scp | - Frem your peaonalview selectthe hiah4t ARO ud then the lflest

' Shp 2 - S.ore the HIGHESTARO 7,ud the LOWESTARO l.Fin.llts@re the MEDIUMAROk usings.orcs I ud L rh.din.tth $tudtonBtountn

th ae aftEmr b!*!i,mor e o $d sodd ol xot8 B

d oa qro n vhpotu^ - tu

lR n.o$,rd iD rovtu\| k n t* h

t Step 3 - Re.od yoo E-oninaaoryou score on th.

' St.p ,l - S.orcs coll€.t.d

Res€arch PotertialP.o.edurer Table Groups

t Dis.uss the RseaEh Potential of ea.fi ARO using prcliminey3.orinsto initiate dis.ussion

r ihink alout the impd that Bearch ould m.lG to rchidinsthe potential benefis - Cd GseaEh h€lp?

, Think aboot E Eh pot€ntial in terms ot , lsth.n.iorcsu€.l&r orrese.(h,or alackorsood ' what re tfi€ n.io Eseeh oppotunities

-(d3e or dlfllcurq of Edfth)l

The R€seatch "s" culve

ASSESSING RESEARCH CAPACITY

' Res€arch apa.ity - 6tl€d, Vdrdht dbihy o

@dl.ritiEly d*rt| res5 h dd.n.nlior ecd b

de,iEr Es€cEh oulru6 ro uGrs

' Research apa.ity ifrpB€s with:

, The quality and breadth of 3kills available

' The ability to put togetler high performing

' The efii.iency ofiunning the re3edh

I The quaiity of infrrstructure and equipment

I The quality nd efficiency of support st.fi.nd

ASSESSING RESPARCN POTENTIAL

' 9cientili c potential - Efd s 1L f.t z6*h in

e'o*,.dF i, tt Eldont si.ntiti f.lds dd th.

ovcilobilhy of Ereor./l 6ols dnA c.hniques b Ue6on

, S.ientifi< potential is hiaherl

' The fdter the rde of chanCe in relndt db.iplines

, Th get€rth€ lik lihood of *i€ntilic adnnce

, The betbr ad more ac.esli5le the relenh bols

, The hisher the atio of baic ed stat€ai 6s Eh

Score Research Potential

I Step | - Fmm your peEonal virysele.tthe hirhest AROS and then the lNelt

t Step 2- S.orc the HIGHESTARO 7,and the LOWEST ARO I Finalln score th€ i4EOIU|l ARO's usinas.ores 3 and 5 ft.ofraf reqtuqto^h.o.ffii^.

r[ EbnE djfEErco 6!e!i r^or e o 'id lpddd.fnoa 6

ie nffi$drh r.ut rt.w t2k ta hpodo4 r., rt orh.n, ' Step 3 - Re.ord tour rcdoni.sforyours.orc on th.

, Step a - Scoa.olleded

Research CapacityProcedur€r Table Groups, Dis.$ithe Rese.rch C.p.ci9ofe&hARO usinapreliminary scorin! to initi.t€ dis.ustion

t Think about the available kndleds€ andskills of

re<€fth !.i€ntisa invietmm ben€fits.- Cd w.

r Think about f€s€arch apa.itt in terms of:

' Hry mud, imshdt (ru.ds rd r:.iritia or qulpm€nt) hmr|readybanmad€r

, what aE the skirrs s.ps dd hm cat *irl lt bc to llll

4

Score Reseatch CaDacitv

' skp | - Frem your peBonal viesele.ttn6 hieh.st

AROs dd th€n the ldsr

' Step 2- Score the HIGHESTARO 7,and th.

LOWEST ARO | Finatlt scorc th MEDTUM AROt

usina s.ores 3 and 5 rn in ot 6E !rutvtua t@.\dntn

rre €rdr'E dftE,iq rtu.ninor so a 6dc 'pEod af*t6k

q n t c o L l n h D o , d - k ,d Dr"r tu i, rlurft, n n 69 ht

I St€p 3 - Record you resonina for your *oE on tfie

I Step 4 -S<oB cott t€d

PO'IIINTIAI, BE\IEFITS IMPORT BY

PolENTLu, BDNEFTTS - In]tpi)Rl Bf

N' - -!:i1

! i , , d t = l

^:.1 :

H,sh labor fo.c in aericultuE ecior: ltnml indctri.l

secior.a not abeorb lote oflabor=> l.r' ae]

Slow sifuctufe change: Cmp !$dlction st occnpies a

Lo{ quahiy ol aeri ?&duct

U.stabililiiyhsk : pnce/wearher

Envircnnenial polhiion

' rhe confibuiion of loresiry in econoni grwih toner

:j):

Population: 87 mil persons

Population density: 260 person/km2

r Urban population; 28.11Yo

Rural population: 71.89olo

| Fishery: 5.4%

Land use structure

Agricultural Land accounting only for 290/0 of Natubl area

r&r,r.ndrNon-&r.bd runEdcoppinq

Structure of GDP, %

: Share ofAgnculturc

-_zk (icludingForestry

and Fishery) in GDP tend io declining, accounting lor 22.7o/r in 2AO9 (400/0 in 1990)

i;isi;ft;;;;da r;;;

' GDP per capita: 1,100USD

Slart wilh program on ru?l deveoprlenl

Export of Agricultural Products 2009

E Asi.,ftd *br ! Foreaa r frkiE

Area of Selected Crops 2000-2010

1000ha Planted Area of Selected Crops 2009

Ric production h Vietn{ d

r lclvl (Fertilizers, Water, IPNlvl,

r P M ) i) Post-harvest handling , Hard-working and skill Farmers

VN Agriculture:

Constraints and challenges

- Production is mainly based on natural

advantages (need market oriented)

- The main share in agriculture GDP is crop

production

VN Agriculture:

Constraints and challenges

, Value of agricultural production per ha is low (1,100USD/ha) Producton cost is high, product quality is ow.

Post-harvest handling is poor (13olo loses for cereal, 25 30o/o for fruit, vegetable).

Low percentage of processed products)

Constraints: Main issues related to

science and technology

)Produdion was not sustainable, deoendino on

the weather conditions

ii) There is big yield gap.

ii) Redudion trend in orowth of croo Drodudion

(5.20lo in 2000,4.6% jn 2004,3010 currently).

iii) No strateoic ''Dhntinq-ifestroyinq" olan leadrno to the common

situ;tron (2001 to 20091 101,00dha litchi; 23,000 ha coffee; 40,000 ha

Constfaints: Main issues related to science and technology (Cont)

CDp yield has ncrea*d, but ow

- Ri@: VN r 5,4 ton9ha 6,2tons/ha in China, japan,

- Maize:vN 4 tons/ha us:8tons/ha

' Peanut: VN:2tons/ha,3tons/ha n china and neary

6 tons/ha in Israel -Soybeanr40- 50% of averaqe,v) Postharyest loss was sanin@nt, number ofva.iefiesused was too hGh rovei 300 rce vaneh* n ule wholecountry) Prccsled prodlcts make up a sma I

i) Enphastzed too nuch on the applEd research

and less emphaszed on basic research

ii) Research co aboration has qosrcssed but has

not net the requirenents

ii, Research oukones were not sustainable, the

application of nany rcsearch outcomes are not

stablq no rcsearch strategies.

Future Orientations

4

Increasing investment in Agriculture

(especially for irrigation works)

- Renovation in policy (land, commodity

consumption, credit for the poor )

Higher investment in agricultural

Science & Technology

Objectives for Agriculture

Develpment

- Sector's value increase at 2,60/o/year, of which food crop increase 1,lqolyear, industrial crop 3.84/o/ yeat, lruit 4.3o/a lyeat.

- Production of45.2 million tons of food (rice 39.6 mlllion tons, maize 6 million tons) in

2015 and 48.8 million tons (rice 41.3 million bons, maize 7.5 milhon tons) n 2020.

- Export turn-over in 20151 11 billion USD; 12 billion tiSD in 2020.

- stop importing maize, soybean

Measures for Implementation :

3 Pillars

1 Science & Technology

2 Enterprises (Capital, Effectiveness, Quality )

3 Policies (Land acc!mulaton, stimulus package for mechanization and

investment for infrastructure)

Research Priorities

1 Plant Breeding

2 Integrated Technology focusing on improving

effediveness of input (s€eds, fertilizers, labour,

3 Post harvest Handlings

4 Natural resource management

5 Food safety

6 Climate change mitigation and adaptation

7 Produdion models and policy (Value Chain)

Criteria for identifying

r 8 Fruits (Pomelo; Orange; Mango; Dragon

mab, tB, Dranr Dmtdbn and l;im no b.hnoboy.

, !.c* n oualrled s ent sis in hvbl d d.e resrch: cbfle;

cashs; suqa€ne, Pepper, cdonul P€nut,

enouoh h'oh duar'r,en '8tu'.5 i27 ph.D a,ii 9l Ms not

' n L d ' o n m 6 t u n a , r P P a , ! o r ^ i 9 r N c v D ^

don t hde em6rr read no *ren0st n r€vcoDs le a trus,

rc abd b shofriem ]earlr Doie.is

6

1 l4aize 2, Peanut 3, Sugarcane

5 Coma

i 6 Flower 7 Coconut B, Sedge

RESOURCES:

1, Research opportunities

The Gov€rnment has omh tted to spend 29d of stateopenditure for esearch researcll

Crops vadeties and anima bred improvement

r Inftd+ructures ha@ ben uroraded In mon ofre.r.h n4itutions wfth draloan of 60 million USD

setter linkace and @peration through re-organizlnqTh€ Go@rnment nven h oveBea oostoraduatebalnLnc wrh the budodofT 8 millroriLJ5D/vea The aqiicultural b ote-chno oqy proqram a { alocates

a sqnihcant budoet for oveBea postqraduate t6ininq,The Government allows tor commercia izino new crops

Challenges for research

Lack of leading scientists.

I Beside the advantages, the independence mechanisn'r and self- responsibility to organization and finance will create the focus on the work

involving getting income to cover salary ano omer expenses,

Lack of research strategies is a great challenge, hampering the slrstainability

of research priorities

Challenges for research

r Relatively decreasing in investment for

agriculture (o/o of total investment).

Higher profit from farming

r Higher income for farmers

Harmonizing Agriculture-Rural and

Farmers Development

Challenges for research

Relatively decreasing in funding for agriculture research (yo of total state

expenditurc for S&T) , 1996:13.1 2000:9.1 2005:9.4

Thank you for your attention!

The Aclievetn€nts of Arimal Prodrctior

During Recent Ycars

l h! iraru ollivdsrocl Foltud vlLLLe l,aslir@sed tin'n l8 9%

rn L99sti1791inllJ03 Avenge gro\*h nrc is7%pq retu

Lnenock nunrb!6 den0e rhc 161 l0 !ca6 hile rnftxsLd.l

Nlcd produclion rn r.rsed fto l3nlLlnnr MTir2000ro

1 63 nrLlionMl in 2009(l foldl, grofih mle of 6.J-7 0ti p.r

r0/02/207r

The Achievemeltlt of Animal Production During Recent Years

SCIENCE AND TECIINOLOGY IN

I,IVI]STOCK PRODIJCTrcN AND

Iom.eliicrc6.ddefrsdolliwlo.ltrodFsml.almd lmprovng!g ilrc.nllynudlonxl{xlu\ol depeopleswell Scnin!a M iilpd{antmcdhe som! oarlDo$ vieinan

u l ' e * i 9 h f u d ' ! q r t t q j i l

Remarkab e ncr€se of product vity

n Mekonq catfish n ponds Ms fioh

THE RESEARCH PRIORITIES IN FISHERYSECIOR

THE REAEARCH PRIORITIES IN FISHERYSECTOR

An average productivity of carp culture in wide range of environments has increased from 900k9/ha peryear to 2000k9, while tilapia culture has increased from 3-4 tons/ha/year to 20 tons/ha/yeaa.

THE RESEARCH PRIORITIES IN FISHERYSECTOR

fish, mollusc and crLrstacean species have been

domesticated and used for aquaculiure culture in freshwater, brackish watef and marine environmenis

THE RESEARCH PRIORITIES IN FISHERYSECTOR

Aquaculture has developed to

use off-farm inputs such as

feeds, chemicals, energy etc.

RESXARCE PRIORITIIS TN FISH trRY S[C'I'OR

New fishing technologies for

off-shore exploilalion includino

selected gear for pelagic

species and tuna are the

signif icant achievements in

fishery sector

REStrARCII PRIOR|TINS IN NISIII1RYSECTOR

d iversification of cu ltu re/fa m ing

systems were intensively carried

out Thus, productivity ofthe

lradition systems such as

integraied and polycLrllure,

rice-cum-f ish/shrimp systems were

much enhanced

THE RESEARCH PRIORITIES IN FISHERYSECTOR

Differeni farming systems slch

as rice/fish-shrimp, intensive shrimp and Mekong calfish;

cage culturc and marine cage cullure in open sea; etc have been developed and

introduced to aquacu ture practices

RXSf,ARCII PRIORIIIXS IN IISHf,RY SXCTOR

2 Research priorities in the next period Research priorities in the next period

production and grow out technologies for allfish, mollusc ano cruslacean specres

Rf,SDARCF PRIORITIESIN FISHI RYSf,CTOR

New farming systems such as intensive shrimD fish culture ([rekong catlish, tilapra, Inlenstve snflmp, cage cu Iure In reservorls ano open sea),