1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Báo cáo hóa học: " Research Article Hybrid Iterative Methods for Convex Feasibility Problems and Fixed Point Problems of Relatively Nonexpansive Mappings in Banach Spaces" docx

19 291 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 19
Dung lượng 559,62 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Volume 2008, Article ID 583082, 19 pagesdoi:10.1155/2008/583082 Research Article Hybrid Iterative Methods for Convex Feasibility Problems and Fixed Point Problems of Relatively Nonexpans

Trang 1

Volume 2008, Article ID 583082, 19 pages

doi:10.1155/2008/583082

Research Article

Hybrid Iterative Methods for Convex Feasibility Problems and Fixed Point Problems of Relatively Nonexpansive Mappings in Banach Spaces

Somyot Plubtieng and Kasamsuk Ungchittrakool

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand

Correspondence should be addressed to Somyot Plubtieng,somyotp@nu.ac.th

Received 2 July 2008; Accepted 23 December 2008

Recommended by Hichem Ben-El-Mechaiekh

The convex feasibility problemCFP of finding a point in the nonempty intersectionN

i1 C iis

considered, where N  1 is an integer and the C i’s are assumed to be convex closed subsets of a

Banach space E By using hybrid iterative methods, we prove theorems on the strong convergence

to a common fixed point for a finite family of relatively nonexpansive mappings Then, we apply our results for solving convex feasibility problems in Banach spaces

Copyrightq 2008 S Plubtieng and K Ungchittrakool This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

1 Introduction

i1

space E This problem is a frequently appearing problem in diverse areas of mathematical

Hilbert spaces which captures applications in various disciplines such as image restoration

tomography with limited data, in which an unknown image has to be reconstructed from a priori knowledge and from measured results, each piece of information gives a constraint

Trang 2

So projection methods have dominated in the iterative approaches toCFP in Hilbert spaces;

the convex feasibility problem by convex combinations of sunny nonexpansive retractions

is a nonempty closed convex subset of a smooth, reflexive, and strictly convex Banach

onto C is not generally nonexpansive Our purpose in the present paper is to obtain an

analogous result for a finite family of relatively nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces

convergence theorems to approximate a fixed point of a single relatively nonexpansive

y n  J−1

α n Jx n1− α n

JTx n

,

H n z ∈ C : φz, y n

 φz, x n

,

W n z ∈ C :x n − z, Jx − Jx n

 0,

x n1 ΠH n ∩W n x, n  0, 1, 2, ,

1.2

by

y n  J−1

α n Jx n1− α n

Jz n

,

z n  J−1

β1n Jx n  β2n JTx n  β n3JSx n

,

H nz ∈ C : φz, y n

 φz, x n

,

W nz ∈ C :x n − z, Jx − Jx n

 0,

x n1  P H n ∩W n x, n  0, 1, 2, ,

1.3

F : FS ∩ FT.

We note that the block iterative method is a method which often used by many authors

a finite family of relatively nonexpansive mappings in a Banach space by using the hybrid method in mathematical programming In this paper, we introduce the following iterative

Trang 3

process by using the shrinking method proposed, whose studied by Takahashi et al.26,

F :N i1 FT i  / ∅ Define {x n} in the two following ways:

y n  J−1

α n Jx n1− α n

Jz n

,

z n  J−1 β1n Jx n N

i1

β i1 n JT i x n

,

C n1z ∈ C n : φ

z, y n

 φz, x n

,

x n1 ΠC n1 x0, n  0, 1, 2, ,

1.4

and

x0∈ C,

y n  J−1

α n Jx n1− α n

Jz n

,

z n  J−1 β1n Jx n N

i1

β i1 n JT i x n

,

H nz ∈ C : φz, y n

 φz, x n

,

W nz ∈ C :x n − z, Jx0− Jx n

 0,

x n1 ΠH n ∩W n x0, n  0, 1, 2, ,

1.5

where{α n }, {β i n } ⊂ 0, 1, N1 i1 β i n  1 satisfy some appropriate conditions

spaces Moreover, we apply our results to the problem of finding a common zero of a finite family of maximal monotone operators and equilibrium problems

Throughout the paper, we will use the notations:

i → for strong convergence and  for weak convergence;

2 Preliminaries

Jx x∈ E∗:

x, x

 x2x∗2

2.1

Trang 4

A Banach space E is said to be strictly convex if x  y/2 < 1 for all x, y ∈ E with

U  {x ∈ E : x  1} be the unit sphere of E Then the Banach space E is said to be smooth

provided that

lim

t → 0

x  ty − x

the duality mapping J is single valued It is also known that if E is uniformly smooth, then

J is uniformly norm-to-norm continuous on each bounded subset of E Some properties of

defined by

V

x, x∗

 x2− 2x, x

for all x ∈ E and x∈ E In other words, V x, x  φx, J−1x for all x ∈ E and x∈ E

Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a smooth, strictly convex, and reflexive

This section collects some definitions and lemmas which will be used in the proofs for the main results in the next section Some of them are known; others are not hard to derive

Trang 5

Lemma 2.1 see 27,30,32 If E is a strictly convex and smooth Banach space, then for x, y ∈ E,

φy, x  0 if and only if x  y.

Proof It is su fficient to show that if φy, x  0 then x  y From 1, we have x  y.

Lemma 2.2 Kamimura and Takahashi 17 Let E be a uniformly convex and smooth Banach

space and let {y n }, {z n } be two sequences of E If φy n , z n  → 0 and either {y n } or {z n } is bounded,

then y n − z n → 0.

Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a smooth, strictly convex, and reflexive Banach space E, let T be a mapping from C into itself, and let FT be the set of all fixed points

mapping if the following conditions are satisfied:

R1 FT is nonempty;

R2 φu, Tx  φu, x for all u ∈ FT and x ∈ C;

R3 FT  FT.

Lemma 2.3 Alber 16, Alber and Reich 31, Kamimura and Takahashi 17 Let C be a

nonempty closed convex subset of a smooth Banach space E, let x ∈ E, and let x0∈ C Then, x0 ΠC x

if and only if x0− y, Jx − Jx0

Lemma 2.4 Alber 16, Alber and Reich 31, Kamimura and Takahashi 17 Let E be a

reflexive, strictly convex and smooth Banach space, let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of E and let x ∈ E Then φy, Π C x  φΠ C x, x  φy, x for all y ∈ C.

Lemma 2.5 Let E be a uniformly convex Banach space and let B r 0  {x ∈ E : x  r} be a closed

ball of E Then there exists a continuous strictly increasing convex function g : 0, ∞ → 0, ∞ with g0  0 such that







N

i1

ω i x i







2

i1

ω i x i2− ω j ω k g x j − x k , for any j,k ∈ {1,2, ,N}, 2.5

where {x i}N

i1 ⊂ B r 0 and {ω i}N i1 ⊂ 0, 1 with N

i1 ω i  1.

Proof It sufficient to show that







N

i1

ω i x i







2

i1

Trang 6

It is obvious that2.6 holds for N  1, 2 see 34 for more details Next, we assume that







N

i1

ω i x i







2





ω N x N



1− ω N N−1

i1

ω i

1− ω N x i







2

 ω N x N21− ω N





N−1

i1

ω i

1− ω N x i





2

 ω N x N21− ω N N−1

i1

ω i

1− ω N x i2−ω1ω2

1− ω N2g x1− x2

i1

ω i x i2−ω1ω2

1− ω N gx1− x2

i1

ω i x i2− ω1ω2g x1− x2.

2.7 This completes the proof

Lemma 2.6 Let C be a closed convex subset of a smooth Banach space E and let x, y ∈ E Then the

set K : {v ∈ C : φv, y  φv, x} is closed and convex.

Proof As a matter of fact, the defining inequality in K is equivalent to the inequality



v, 2Jx − Jy  x2− y2. 2.8 This inequality is affine in v and hence the set K is closed and convex

3 Main result

In this section, we prove strong convergence theorems for finding a common fixed point of

a finite family of relatively nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces by using the hybrid method in mathematical programming

Theorem 3.1 Let E be a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space, and let C be a

nonempty closed convex subset of E Let {T i}N i1 be a finite family of relatively nonexpansive mappings from C into itself such that F :N i1 FT i  is nonempty and let x0∈ E For C1 C and x1 ΠC1x0, define a sequence {x n } of C as follows:

y n  J−1

α n Jx n1− α n

Jz n

,

z n  J−1 β1n Jx n N

i1

β i1 n JT i x n

,

C n1z ∈ C n : φ

z, y n

 φz, x n

,

x n1 ΠC x0, n  0, 1, 2, ,

3.1

Trang 7

where {α n }, {β n i } ⊂ 0, 1 satisfy the following conditions:

i 0  α n < 1 for all n ∈ N ∪ {0} and lim sup n → ∞ α n < 1,

ii 0  β i n  1 for all i  1, 2, , N  1, N1

i1 β i n  1 for all n ∈ N ∪ {0} If either

a lim infn → ∞ β1n β i1 n > 0 for all i  1, 2, , N or

b limn → ∞ β1n  0 and lim inf n → ∞ β k1 n β l1 n > 0 for all i / j, k, l  1, 2, , N Then the sequence {x n } converges strongly to Π F x0, whereΠF is the generalized projection from E onto F.

Proof We first show by induction that F ⊂ C n for all n ∈ N F ⊂ C1is obvious Suppose that

F ⊂ C k for some k ∈ N Then, we have, for u ∈ F ⊂ C k,

φ

u, y k

 φu, J−1

α k Jx k1− α k

Jz k

 Vu, α k Jx k1− α k

Jz k

 α k V

u, Jx k

1− α k

V

u, Jz k

 α k φ

u, x k

1− α k

φ

u, z k

,

φ

u, z k

 V u, β1k Jx k N

i1

β i1 k JT i x k

 β1k V

u, Jx k

i1

β i1 k V

u, JT i x k

 φu, x k

.

3.2

It follow that

φ

u, y k

 φu, x k

3.3

x n ΠC n x0, we have

φ

x n , x0

 φu, x0

− φu, x n

 φu, x0

φ

x n , x0

 φu, x0

φ

x n , x0

 min

y∈C φ

y, x0

 φx n1 , x0

Trang 8

Therefore{φx n , x0} is nondecreasing So there exists the limit of φx n , x0 ByLemma 2.4,

we have

φ

x n1 , x n

 φx n1 , Π C n x0



 φx n1 , x0



− φC n x0, x0



 φx n1 , x0



− φx n , x0



.

3.7

φ

x n1 , y n

 φx n1 , x n

lim

n → ∞ x n1 − y n  lim

n → ∞ x n1 − x n   0. 3.9

Since J is uniformly norm-to-norm continuous on bounded sets, we have

lim

n → ∞ Jx n1 − Jy n  limn → ∞ Jx n1 − Jx n   0. 3.10

SinceJx n1 − Jy n   Jx n1 − α n Jx n − 1 − α n Jz n   1 − α n Jx n1 − Jz n  − α n Jx n − Jx n1

Jx n1 − Jz n  11− α

n Jx n1 − Jy n   α n Jx n − Jx n1

uniformly norm-to-norm continuous on bounded sets, it follows that

lim

n → ∞ x n1 − z n  limn → ∞ J−1

Jx n1

− J−1

Fromx n − z n   x n − x n1   x n1 − z n, we have limn → ∞ x n − z n  0

Trang 9

Next, we show thatx n − T i x n  → 0 for all i  1, 2, , N Since {x n} is bounded and

φp, T i x n   φp, x n  for all i  1, 2, , N, where p ∈ F We also obtain that {Jx n } and {JT i x n}

are bounded for all i  1, 2, , N Then there exists r > 0 such that {Jx n }, {JT i x n } ⊂ B r0 for

φ

p, z n



p, β n1Jx n N

i1

β i1 n JT i x n







β1n Jx n N

i1

β i1 n JT i x n





2

 p2− 2β1n 

p, Jx n

i1

β i1 n 

p, JT i x n

 β1n x n2 N

i1

β i1 n T i x n2

− β1n β i1 n g Jx n − JT i x n

 β1n 

p2− 2p, Jx n

x n2

i1

β i1 n 

p2 2p, JT i x n

T i x n2

− β1n β i1 n g Jx n − JT i x n

 β1n φ

p, x n

i1

β n i1 φ

p, T i x n

− β n1β i1 n g Jx n − JT i x n

 φp, x n

− β n1β i1 n g Jx n − JT i x n

3.13

and hence

β1n β i1 n g Jx n − JT i x n   φp,x n

− φp, z n

 2p, z n − x n

x n   z n x n  − z n

 2pz n − x n   x n   z n x n − z n

−→ 0,

3.14

Lemma 2.5 Bya, we have limn → ∞ gJx n − JT i x n  0 and then limn → ∞ Jx n − JT i x n  0

we obtain

lim

n → ∞ x n − T i x n  lim

n → ∞ J−1

Jx n

− J−1

Trang 10

for all i  1, 2, , N If b holds, we get

φ

p, z n



p, β n1Jx n N

i1

β i1 n JT i x n







β1n Jx n N

i1

β i1 n JT i x n





2

 p2− 2β1n 

p, Jx n

i1

β i1 n 

p, JT i x n

 β1n x n2 N

i1

β i1 n T i x n2

− β k1 n β l1 n g JT k x n − JT l x n

 β1n 

p2− 2p, Jx n

x n2

i1

β i1 n 

p2 2p, JT i x n

T i x n2

− β k1 n β l1 n g JT k x n − JT l x n

 β1n φ

p, x n

i1

β n i1 φ

p, T i x n

− β n k1 β n l1 g JT k x n − JT l x n

 φp, x n

− β n k1 β l1 n g JT k x n − JT l x n

3.16 and hence

β k1 n β l1 n g JT k x n − JT l x n   φp,x n

− φp, z n

 2p, z n − x n

x n   z n x n  − z n

 2pz n − x n   x n   z n x n − z n

−→ 0.

3.17

Then by the same argument above, we have limn → ∞ T k x n − T l x n   0 for all k, l  1, 2, , N.

Next, we observe that

φT k x n , z n   V T k x n , β n1Jx n N

i1

β i1 n JT i x n

 β1n V

T k x n , Jx n

i1

β i1 n V

T k x n , JT i x n

 β1n φ

T k x n , x n

i1

β i1 n φ

T k x n , T i x n

−→ 0.

3.18

Trang 11

as β1n → 0 ByLemma 2.2, we have limn → ∞ T k x n − z n   0 for all k  1, 2, , N, and

hence

for all i  1, 2, , N Then ω w x n ⊂N

i1 FT i N

i1 FT i   F.

v ∈ ω w x n  ⊂ F Put w : Π F x0∈ F ⊂ C n k, we observe that

φ

x n k , x0

 φC nk x0, x0

 min

y∈C nk φ

y, x0

 φw, x0

 min

z∈F φ

z, x0

 φv, x0

φ

v, x0

 lim inf

k → ∞ φ

x n k , x0

 lim sup

k → ∞

φ

x n k , x0

 φw, x0

 φv, x0

Corollary 3.2 Let E be a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space, and let C be a

nonempty closed convex subset of E Let {Ω i}N i1 be a finite family of nonempty closed convex subset of

C such that Ω :N i1Ωi is nonempty and let x0∈ E For C1 C and x1  ΠC1x0, define a sequence

{x n } of C as follows:

y n  J−1

α n Jx n1− α n

Jz n

,

z n  J−1 β1n Jx n N

i1

β i1 n JΠΩi x n

,

C n1z ∈ C n : φ

z, y n

 φz, x n

,

x n1 ΠC n1 x0, n  0, 1, 2, ,

3.22

where {α n }, {β n i } ⊂ 0, 1 satisfy the following conditions:

i 0  α n < 1 for all n ∈ N ∪ {0} and lim sup n → ∞ α n < 1,

ii 0  β i n  1 for all i  1, 2, , N  1, N1 i1 β i n  1 for all n ∈ N ∪ {0} If either

a lim infn → ∞ β1n β i1 n > 0 for all i  1, 2, , N or

b limn → ∞ β1n  0 and lim inf n → ∞ β k1 n β l1 n > 0 for all i / j, k, l  1, 2, , N Then the sequence {x n } converges strongly to ΠΩx0, whereΠΩ is the generalized projection from E onto Ω.

Trang 12

Theorem 3.3 Let E be a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space, and let C be a

nonempty closed convex subset of E Let {T i}N

i1 be a finite family of relatively nonexpansive mappings from C into itself such that F :N i1 FT i  is nonempty Let a sequence {x n } defined by

x0∈ C,

y n  J−1

α n Jx n1− α n

Jz n

,

z n  J−1 β1n Jx n N

i1

β n i1 JT i x n

,

H nz ∈ C : φz, y n

 φz, x n

,

W nz ∈ C :x n − z, Jx0− Jx n

 0,

x n1 ΠH n ∩W n x0, n  0, 1, 2, ,

3.23

where {α n }, {β n i } ⊂ 0, 1 satisfy the following conditions:

i 0  α n < 1 for all n ∈ N ∪ {0} and lim sup n → ∞ α n < 1,

ii 0  β i n  1 for all i  1, 2, , N  1, N1 i1 β i n  1 for all n ∈ N ∪ {0} If either

a lim infn → ∞ β1n β i1 n > 0 for all i  1, 2, , N or

b limn → ∞ β1n  0 and lim inf n → ∞ β k1 n β l1 n > 0 for all i / j, k, l  1, 2, , N Then the sequence {x n } converges strongly to Π F x0, whereΠF is the generalized projection from E onto F.

Proof From the definition of H n and W n , it is obvious H n and W nare closed and convex for

n ∈ N ∪ {0} Then, as in the proof ofTheorem 3.1, we have

φ

u, z n

 φu, x n

3.24

F ⊂ H n for each n ∈ N ∪ {0} We note by 21, Proposion 2.4 that each FTi is closed and

and

lim

n → ∞ x n1 − y n  limn → ∞ x n1 − x n   0. 3.25

Since J is uniformly norm-to-norm continuous on bounded sets, we have

lim

n → ∞ Jx n1 − Jy n  lim

n → ∞ Jx n1 − Jx n   0. 3.26

...

a finite family of relatively nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces by using the hybrid method in mathematical programming

Theorem 3.1 Let E be a uniformly convex and uniformly... This inequality is affine in v and hence the set K is closed and convex

3 Main result

In this section, we prove strong convergence theorems for finding a common fixed point of. .. nonempty closed convex subset of a smooth, strictly convex, and reflexive Banach space E, let T be a mapping from C into itself, and let FT be the set of all fixed points

mapping if the

Ngày đăng: 21/06/2014, 23:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm