1. Trang chủ
  2. » Khoa Học Tự Nhiên

Báo cáo hoa học: " Research Article Existence of Solutions for m-point Boundary Value Problems on a Half-Line" potx

11 251 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 11
Dung lượng 505,07 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Introduction Multipoint boundary value problems BVPs for second-order differential equations in a finite interval have been studied extensively and many results for the existence of solut

Trang 1

Volume 2009, Article ID 609143, 11 pages

doi:10.1155/2009/609143

Research Article

Problems on a Half-Line

Changlong Yu, Yanping Guo, and Yude Ji

College of Sciences, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, Hebei, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Changlong Yu,changlongyu@126.com

Received 5 April 2009; Accepted 6 July 2009

Recommended by Paul Eloe

By using the Leray-Schauder continuation theorem, we establish the existence of solutions for

m-point boundary value problems on a half-line xt  ft, xt, xt  0, 0 < t < ∞, x0 

m−2

i1 α i xη i , lim t → ∞ xt  0, where α i ∈ R,m−2

i1 α i /  1 and 0 < η1 < η2< · · · < η m−2 < ∞ are

given

Copyrightq 2009 Changlong Yu et al This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

1 Introduction

Multipoint boundary value problems BVPs for second-order differential equations in a finite interval have been studied extensively and many results for the existence of solutions, positive solutions, multiple solutions are obtained by use of the Leray-Schauder continuation theorem, Guo-Krasnosel’skii fixed point theorem, and so on; for details see 1 4 and the references therein

In the last several years, boundary value problems in an infinite interval have been arisen in many applications and received much attention; see 5, 6 Due to the fact that

an infinite interval is noncompact, the discussion about BVPs on the half-line is more complicated, see 5 14 and the references therein Recently, in 15, Lian and Ge studied the following three-point boundary value problem:

xt  ft, x t, xt 0, 0 < t < ∞,

x 0  αxη

t → ∞ xt  0,

1.1

Trang 2

where α ∈ R, α /  1, and η ∈ 0, ∞ are given In this paper, we will study the following

m-point boundary value problems:

xt  ft, x t, xt 0, 0 < t < ∞,

x0 m−2

i1

α i x

η i



where α i ∈ R, m−2

i1 α i /  1, α i have the same signal, and 0 < η1 < η2 < · · · < η m−2 < ∞ are

given We first present the Green function for second-order multipoint BVPs on the half-line and then give the existence results for1.2 using the properties of this Green function and the Leray-Schauder continuation theorem

We use the space C1

0, ∞  {x ∈ C10, ∞, lim t → ∞ xt exists, lim t → ∞ xt exists}

with the normx  max{x, x∞}, where  · ∞is supremum norm on the half-line, and

L10, ∞  {x : 0, ∞ → R is absolutely integrable on 0, ∞} with the norm x L1 

∞

0|xt|dt.

We set

P 

∞

0

p sds, P1

∞

0

sp sds, Q 

∞

0

q sdt, 1.3

and we suppose α i , i  1, 2, , m − 2 are the same signal in this paper and we always assume

α m−2

i1 α i

2 Preliminary Results

In this section, we present some definitions and lemmas, which will be needed in the proof

of the main results

Definition 2.1see 15 It holds that f : 0, ∞ × R2 −→ R is called an S-Carath´eodory

function if and only if

i for each u, v ∈ R2, t → ft, u, v is measurable on 0, ∞,

ii for almost every t ∈ 0, ∞, u, v → ft, u, v is continuous on R2,

iii for each r > 0, there exists ϕ r t ∈ L10, ∞ with tϕ r t ∈ L10, ∞, ϕ r t > 0 on

0, ∞ such that max{|u|, |v|} ≤ r implies |ft, u, v| ≤ ϕ r t, for a.e t ∈ 0, ∞.

i1 α i /  1, if for any vt ∈ L10, ∞ with tvt ∈ L10, ∞, then the

BVP,

xt  vt  0, 0 < t < ∞,

x0 m−2

i1

α i x

η i



Trang 3

has a unique solution Moreover, this unique solution can be expressed in the form

x t 

∞

0

G t, svsds, 2.2

where Gt, s is defined by

G t, s Λ1

m−2

i1

m−2

i1

i



k1

α k η k m−2

ki1

α k s  Λs, 0 < η i ≤ s ≤ η i1 , s ≤ t, i  1, 2, , m − 3,

i



k1

α k η k m−2

ki1

α k s  Λt, 0 < η i ≤ s ≤ η i1 , t ≤ s, i  1, 2, , m − 3,

m−2

i1

α i η i  Λs, s ≥ η m−2 , s ≤ t,

m−2

i1

α i η i  Λt, s ≥ η m−2 , t ≤ s,

2.3

here noteΛ  1 −m−2

i1 α i Proof Integrate the di fferential equation from t to ∞, noticing that vt, tvt ∈ L10, ∞, then from 0 to t and one has

x t  x0 

t

0

∞

s

v τdτ ds. 2.4

Since x0 m−2

i1 α i xη i, from 2.4, it holds that

x t  1

1−m−2

i1 α i

m−2



i1

α i η i

∞

η i

v sds  m−2

i1

α i

η i

0

sv sds  t

∞

t

v sds 

t

0

sv sds.

2.5 For 0≤ t ≤ η1, the unique solution of2.1 can be stated by

x t 

t

0

 m−2

i1 α i s

1−m−2

i1 α i

 s



v sds 

η1

t

 m−2

i1 α i s

1−m−2 i1 α i

 t



v sds

m−3

i1

η i1

η i

i

k1 α k η km−2

ki1 α k s  Λt

1−m−2 i1 α i



v sds 

∞

η m−2

 m−2

i1 α i η i

1−m−2 i1 α i

 t



v sds.

2.6

Trang 4

If η i ≤ t ≤ η i1 , 1 ≤ i ≤ m − 3, the unique solution of 2.1 can be stated by

x t 

η1

0

 m−2

i1 α i s

1−m−2 i1 α i

 s



v sds

i−1

j1

η j1

η j

j k1 α k η km−2

kj1 α k s  Λs

1−m−2 i1 α i

⎠vsds



t

η i

i

k1 α k η km−2

ki1 α k s  Λs

1−m−2 i1 α i



v sds



η i1

t

i k1 α k η km−2

ki1 α k s  Λt

1−m−2 i1 α i



v sds

m−3

ji1

η j1

η j

j k1 α k η km−2

kj1 α k s  Λt

1−m−2 i1 α i

⎠vsds



∞

η m−2

 m−2

i1 α i η i

1−m−2 i1 α i

 t



v sds.

2.7

If η m−2 ≤ t < ∞, the unique solution of 2.1 can be stated by

x t 

η1

0

 m−2

i1 α i s

1−m−2

i1 α i

 s



v sds  m−3

i1

η i1

η i

i k1 α k η km−2

ki1 α k s  Λs

1−m−2 i1 α i



v sds



t

η m−2

 m−2

i1 α i η i

1−m−2 i1 α i

 s



v sds 

∞

t

 m−2

i1 α i η i

1−m−2 i1 α i

 t



v sds.

2.8

We noteΛ  1 −m−2

i1 α i , then

G t, s Λ1

m−2

i1

m−2

i1

i



k1

α k η k m−2

ki1

α k s  Λs, 0 < η i ≤ s ≤ η i1 , s ≤ t, i  1, 2, , m − 3,

i



k1

α k η k m−2

ki1

α k s  Λt, 0 < η i ≤ s ≤ η i1 , t ≤ s, i  1, 2, , m − 3,

m−2

i1

α i η i  Λs, s ≥ η m−2 , s ≤ t,

m−2

i1

α i η i  Λt, s ≥ η m−2 , t ≤ s.

2.9

Trang 5

Therefore, the unique solution of 2.1 is xt  ∞0 Gt, svsds, which completes the

proof

Remark of Lemma 2.2 Obviously Gt, s satisfies the properties of a Green function, so we call Gt, s the Green function of the corresponding homogeneous multipoint BVP of 2.1 on the half-line

Lemma 2.3 For all t, s ∈ 0, ∞, it holds that

|Gt, s| ≤

s,

m−2

i1

α i < 0, s

m−2

i1

α i < 1,

max

m−2

i1 α i s

−Λ ,

m−2

i1 α i η m−2

−Λ

⎭,

m−2

i1

α i > 1.

2.10

Proof For each s ∈ 0, ∞, Gt, s is nondecreasing in t Immediately, we have

min

m−2

i1 α i s

Λ ,

i

k1 α k η km−2

ki1 α k s

m−2

i1 α i η i

Λ



≤ Gt, s ≤ Gs, s

 Λ1

i



k1

α k η k

m−2

ki1

α k Λ



s, η i ≤ s ≤ η i1 < ∞, i  1, 2, , m − 3,

m−2

i1

α i η i  Λs, s ≥ η m−2

2.11

Further, we have

m−2

i1 α i s

Λ ≤ Gt, s ≤ s, m−2

i1

α i < 0,

0 < min

m−2

i1 α i s

Λ ,

m−2

i1 α i η1

Λ



≤ Gt, s ≤ Λs , 0≤m−2

i1

α i < 1,

min

m−2

i1 α i s

Λ ,

m−2

i1 α i η m−2

Λ



≤ Gt, s ≤ s, m−2

i1

α i > 1.

2.12

Therefore, we get the result

Trang 6

Lemma 2.4 For the Green function Gt, s, it holds that

lim

t → ∞ G t, s  Gs

 Λ1

i



k1

α k η k

m−2



ki1

α k Λ



s, η i ≤ s ≤ η i1 < ∞, i  1, 2, , m − 3

m−2

i1

α i η i  Λs, s ≥ η m−2

2.13

x0 m−2

i1

α i x

η i



2.14

and α i i  1, 2, , m − 2 have the same signal, 0 < η1 < η2 < · · · < η m−2 < ∞, then there exists

η ∈ η1, η m−2  satisfying

x 0  αxη

where α m−2

i1 α i

Proof Let α i i  1, 2, , m − 2 are positive, and note M max{xt | t ∈ η1, η m−2 }, m∗  min{xt | t ∈ η1, η m−2 }, then for every i i  1, 2, , m − 2, we have m≤ xη i  ≤ M,

so m∗m−2

i1 α i ≤ m−2

i1 α i xη i  ≤ M∗m−2

i1 α i , that is, m∗ ≤ m−2

i1 α i xη i /m−2

i1 α i x ≤ M.

Because xt is continuous on the interval η1, η m−2 , there exists η ∈ η1, η m−2 satisfying

x0  αxη, where α m−2

i1 α i

relatively compact in X if the following conditions hold:

a M is uniformly bounded in C0, ∞;

b the functions from M are equicontinuous on any compact interval of 0, ∞;

c the functions from M are equiconvergent, that is, for any given  > 0, there exists a T 

T > 0 such that |ft − f∞| < , for any t > T, f ∈ M.

3 Main Results

Consider the space X  {x ∈ C1

0, ∞, x0 m−2

i1 α i xη i , lim t → ∞ xt  0} and define the operator T : X × 0, 1 → X by

T x, λt  λ

∞

0

G t, sfs, x s, xsds, 0≤ t < ∞. 3.1 The main result of this paper is following

Trang 7

Theorem 3.1 Let f : 0, ∞ × R2 → R be an S-Carath´eodory function Suppose further that there

exists functions pt, qtrt ∈ L10, ∞ with tpt, tqttrt ∈ L10, ∞ such that

f t, u, v ≤ pt|u|  qt|v|  rt 3.2

for almost every t ∈ 0, ∞ and all u, v ∈ R2 Then1.2 has at least one solution provided:

η m−2 P  P1 Q < 1, α < 0,

αη m−2

1− α P  P1 Q < 1, 0 ≤ α < 1,

max



αη m−2

α − 1 P  P1 Q, αP1

α − 1αη m−2 P

α − 1



< 1, α > 1.

3.3

0, 1, Tx, λ is completely continuous in X.

Proof First we show T is well defined Let x ∈ X; then there exists r > 0 such that x ≤ r For

each λ ∈ 0, 1, it holds that

T x, λt  λ

∞

0

G t, sfs, x s, xsds

∞

0

|Gt, s|ϕ r sds < ∞, ∀t ∈ 0, ∞.

3.4

Further, Gt, s is continuous in t so the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem implies

that

|Tx, λt1 − Tx, λt2| ≤ λ

∞

0

|Gt1, s  − Gt2, s|f

s, x s, xsds

≤ λ

∞

0

|Gt1, s  − Gt2, s |ϕ r sds

−→ 0, as t1 −→ t2,

3.5

T x, λt1 − Tx, λt2 ≤ λt2

t1

f

s, x s, xsds

t2

t1

ϕ r sds −→ 0 as t1−→ t2,

3.6

where 0≤ t1, t2< ∞ Thus, Tx ∈ C10, ∞.

Trang 8

Obviously, Tx, λ0 m−2

i1 α i Tx, λη i Notice that

lim

t → ∞ T x, λt  lim

t → ∞

∞

t

f

s, x s, xsds  0, 3.7

so we can get Tx, λt ∈ X.

We claim that Tx, λ is completely continuous in X, that is, for each λ ∈ 0, 1, Tx, λ

is continuous in X and maps a bounded subset of X into a relatively compact set.

Let x n → x as n → ∞ in X Next we prove that for each λ ∈ 0, 1, Tx n , λ → Tx, λ

as n → ∞ in X Because f is a S-Carath´eodory function and



∞

0

G sf

s, x n s, x

n s− fs, x s, xsds

 ≤ 2∞

0



Gs

r0sds < ∞, 3.8

where r0> 0 is a real number such that max{max n∈N\{0} x n , x} ≤ r0, we have

|Tx n , λ ∞ − Tx, λ∞| ≤ λ

∞

0



Gsf

s, x n s, x

n s− fs, x s, xsds

−→ 0, as n −→ ∞.

3.9

Also, we can get

|Tx n , λ t − Tx n , λ ∞| ≤ λ

∞

0



Gt, s − Gsf

s, x n s, x

n sds

∞

0



Gt, s − Gs

r0sds

−→ 0, as t −→ ∞,

3.10

T x n , λt − Tx n , λ∞ ≤∞

t

f

s, x n s, x

n sds

∞

t

ϕ r0sds −→ 0, as t −→ ∞.

3.11

Similarly, we have

|Tx, λt − Tx, λ∞| −→ 0, as t −→ ∞,

T x, λt − Tx, λ∞ −→ 0, as t −→ ∞ 3.12

Trang 9

For any positive number T0< ∞, when t ∈ 0, T0, we have

|Tx n , λ t − Tx, λt| ≤

∞

0

|Gt, s|f

s, x n s, x

n s− fs, x s, xsds

−→ 0, as n −→ ∞,

T x n , λt − Tx, λt ≤∞

t

f

s, x n s, x

n s− fs, x s, xsds

−→ 0, as n −→ ∞.

3.13

Combining3.9–3.13, we can see that T·, λ is continuous Let B ⊂ X be a bounded subset; it is easy to prove that TB is uniformly bounded In the same way, we can prove

3.5,3.6, and 3.12, we can also show that TB is equicontinuous and equiconvergent Thus,

Proof of Theorem 3.1 In view ofLemma 2.2, it is clear that x ∈ X is a solution of the BVP 1.2 if

and only if x is a fixed point of T·, 1 Clearly, Tx, 0  0 for each x ∈ X If for each λ ∈ 0, 1 the fixed points T·, λ in X belong to a closed ball of X independent of λ, then the Leray-Schauder continuation theorem completes the proof We have known T·, λ is completely

continuous byLemma 3.2 Next we show that the fixed point of T·, λ has a priori bound M independently of λ Assume x  Tx, λ and set

Q1

∞

0

sq sds, R 

∞

0

r sds, R1 

∞

0

sr sdt. 3.14

According toLemma 2.5, we know that for any x ∈ X, there exists η ∈ η1, η m−2 satisfying

x0  αxη Hence, there are three cases as follow.

Case 1 α < 0 For any x ∈ X, x0xη ≤ 0 holds and, therefore, there exists a t0∈ 0, η such that xt0  0 Then, we have

|xt| 





t

t0

xsds



 ≤



t  ηx

∞≤t  η m−2x

, t ∈ 0, ∞, 3.15

and so it holds that

x

∞≤λft, x, x

L1≤ft, x, x

L1

≤pt|xt|  qt|xt|  rt

L1

≤η m−2 P  P1 Qx

 R,

3.16

therefore,

x∞≤ R

Trang 10

At the same time, we have

|xt| ≤ λ

∞

0

G t, sfs, x s, xsds



∞

0

sf

s, x s, xsds

≤ P1x Q1M1  R1, t ∈ 0, ∞,

3.18

and so

x∞≤ Q1M1 R1

1− P1  M1. 3.19

Set M  max{M1, M1}, which is independent of λ.

Case 2 0 ≤ α < 1 For any x ∈ X, we have

|xt| 



αx



η



t

0

xsds



 ≤ αx

η   tx

, t ∈ 0, ∞, 3.20

which implies that|xt| ≤ αη/1 − α  tx∞≤ αη m−2 /1 − α  tx∞for all t ∈ 0, ∞.

In the same way as for Case1, we can get

x∞≤ 1 − αR

1 − α1 − P1− Q − αη m−2 P  M

2,

x∞≤ Q1M2 R1

1− α − P1  M2.

3.21

Set M  max{M2, M2}, which is independent of λ and is what we need.

Case 3 α > 1 For x ∈ X, we have

|xt| 



x



η



t

η

xsds



 ≤

1

α |x0| t − ηx

, t ∈ 0, ∞, 3.22

and so|xt| ≤ αη/α − 1  tx∞≤ αη m−2 /α − 1  tx∞for all t ∈ 0, ∞.

Similarly, we obtain

x

∞≤ α − 1R

α − 11 − P1− Q − αη m−2 P  M

3,

x∞≤ α



Q1M3 R1



 αη m−2



QM3  R

3.23

Set M  max{M3, M3} and which is we need So 1.2 has at least one solution

Trang 11

The Natural Science Foundation of Hebei ProvinceA2009000664 and the Foundation of Hebei University of Science and TechnologyXL200759 are acknowledged

References

1 C P Gupta, “A note on a second order three-point boundary value problem,” Journal of Mathematical

Analysis and Applications, vol 186, no 1, pp 277–281, 1994.

2 C P Gupta and S I Trofimchuk, “A sharper condition for the solvability of a three-point second

order boundary value problem,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol 205, no 2, pp.

586–597, 1997

3 R Ma, “Positive solutions for second-order three-point boundary value problems,” Applied

Mathematics Letters, vol 14, no 1, pp 1–5, 2001.

4 Y Guo and W Ge, “Positive solutions for three-point boundary value problems with dependence on

the first order derivative,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol 290, no 1, pp 291–301,

2004

5 D O’Regan, Theory of Singular Boundary Value Problems, World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, USA, 1994.

6 R P Agarwal and D O’Regan, Infinite Interval Problems for Differential, Difference and Integral Equations,

Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001

7 J V Baxley, “Existence and uniqueness for nonlinear boundary value problems on infinite intervals,”

Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol 147, no 1, pp 122–133, 1990.

8 D Jiang and R P Agarwal, “A uniqueness and existence theorem for a singular third-order boundary value problem on0, ∞,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol 15, no 4, pp 445–451, 2002.

9 R Ma, “Existence of positive solution for second-order boundary value problems on infinite

intervals,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol 16, pp 33–39, 2003.

10 C Bai and J Fang, “On positive solutions of boundary value problems for second-order functional differential equations on infinite intervals,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol 282,

no 2, pp 711–731, 2003

11 B Yan and Y Liu, “Unbounded solutions of the singular boundary value problems for second order differential equations on the half-line,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol 147, no 3, pp 629–

644, 2004

12 Y Tian and W Ge, “Positive solutions for multi-point boundary value problem on the half-line,”

Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol 325, no 2, pp 1339–1349, 2007.

13 Y Tian, W Ge, and W Shan, “Positive solutions for three-point boundary value problem on the

half-line,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol 53, no 7, pp 1029–1039, 2007.

14 M Zima, “On positive solutions of boundary value problems on the half-line,” Journal of Mathematical

Analysis and Applications, vol 259, no 1, pp 127–136, 2001.

15 H Lian and W Ge, “Solvability for second-order three-point boundary value problems on a half-line,”

Applied Mathematics Letters, vol 19, no 10, pp 1000–1006, 2006.

... M3} and which is we need So 1.2 has at least one solution

Trang 11

The Natural Science...

Trang 9

For any positive number T0< ∞, when t ∈ 0, T0, we have

|Tx...

Trang 4

If η i ≤ t ≤ η i1 , ≤ i ≤ m − 3, the unique solution of 2.1 can

Ngày đăng: 21/06/2014, 20:20

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm