We show the existence of a week solution in W01,pxΩ to a Dirichlet problem for −Δpx u fx, u inΩ, and its localization.. This approach is based on the nonlinear alternative of Leray-Scha
Trang 1Volume 2010, Article ID 120646, 7 pages
doi:10.1155/2010/120646
Research Article
Existence and Localization Results for
px-Laplacian via Topological Methods
B Cekic and R A Mashiyev
Department of Mathematics, Dicle University, 21280 Diyarbakir, Turkey
Correspondence should be addressed to B Cekic,bilalcekic@gmail.com
Received 23 February 2010; Revised 16 April 2010; Accepted 20 June 2010
Academic Editor: J Mawhin
Copyrightq 2010 B Cekic and R A Mashiyev This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
We show the existence of a week solution in W01,pxΩ to a Dirichlet problem for −Δpx u fx, u
inΩ, and its localization This approach is based on the nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder
1 Introduction
In this work, we consider the boundary value problem
−Δpxu f x, u in Ω,
whereΩ ⊂ RN , N ≥ 2, is a nonempty bounded open set with smooth boundary ∂Ω, Δ px u
div|∇u|px−2 ∇u is the so-called px-Laplacian operator, and CAR: f : Ω × R → R is a
Caratheodory function which satisfies the growth condition
f x, s ≤ ax C|s| qx/qx for a.e x ∈ Ω and all s ∈ R, 1.1
with C const > 0, 1/qx 1/qx 1 for a.e x ∈ Ω, and a ∈ L qx Ω, ax ≥ 0 for a.e.
x ∈ Ω.
We recall in what follows some definitions and basic properties of variable exponent
Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces L px Ω, W 1,px Ω, and W 1,px
0 Ω In that context, we refer
to1,2 for the fundamental properties of these spaces
Trang 2L∞Ω
p : p ∈ L∞Ω, ess inf
x∈Ω p x > 1
For p ∈ L∞Ω, let p1 : ess infx∈Ωpx ≤ px ≤ p2 : ess supx∈Ω px < ∞, for a.e.
x ∈ Ω.
Let us define byUΩ the set of all measurable real functions defined on Ω For any
p ∈ L∞Ω, we define the variable exponent Lebesgue space by
L pxΩ
u ∈ U Ω : ρpxu
Ω|ux| px dx < ∞
. 1.3
We define a norm, the so-called Luxemburg norm, on this space by the formula
px inf
δ > 0 : ρ px
u δ
≤ 1
andL px
px becomes a Banach space
The variable exponent Sobolev space W 1,pxΩ is
W 1,pxΩ
u ∈ L pxΩ : ∂u
∂x i ∈ L px Ω, i 1, , N
1.5
and we define on this space the norm
for all u ∈ W 1,px Ω The space W 1,px
0 Ω is the closure of C∞
0 Ω in W 1,pxΩ
Proposition 1.1 see 1, 2 If p ∈ L∞
Ω, then the spaces L px Ω, W 1,px Ω, and
W01,px Ω are separable and reflexive Banach spaces.
Proposition 1.2 see 1,2 If u ∈ L px Ω and p2< ∞, then we have
px < 1 1; > 1 ⇔ ρ pxu < 1 1; > 1,
px
p1
px ≤ ρpx p2
px ,
px
p2
px ≤ ρpx p1
px ,
px a > 0 ⇔ ρpxu/a 1.
Trang 3Proposition 1.3 see 3 Assume that Ω is bounded and smooth Denote by CΩ {h ∈ CΩ :
h1> 1}.
i Let p, q ∈ CΩ If
q x < p∗x
⎧
⎪
⎪
Np x
N − p x if p x < N,
∞ if p x ≥ N,
1.7
then W 1,px
ii (Poincar´e inequality, see [1 , Theorem 2.7]) If p ∈ CΩ, then there is a constant C > 0
such that
px px , ∀u ∈ W 1,px
what follows, W01,px Ω, with p ∈ CΩ, will be considered as endowed with the norm
1,px
Lemma 1.4 Assume that r ∈ L∞
Ω and p ∈ CΩ If |u| rx ∈ L px Ω, then we have
min
r1
r xpx , r2
r xpx ≤|u| rx
px≤ max r1
r xpx , r2
Proof ByProposition 1.2iv, we have
1
Ω
|u| rx
|u| rx
px
px
dx
Ω
rxpx |u|
rxpx rxpx
r xpx
|u| rxpx
p x
dx
≤
Ω
rxpx |u|
rxpxmax r
1px
r xpx , r2px
r xpx
|u| rxpx
p x
dx.
1.10
By the mean value theorem, there exists ξ ∈ Ω such that
1≤ max
r
1pξ
r xpx , r2pξ
r xpx
|u| rxpξ
p x
Ω
|u| rxpx
rxpx
dx 1.11
Trang 4and we have
|u| rx
px≤ max r1
r xpx , r2
Similarly
1≥ min
r
1pξ
rxpx , r2pξ
rxpx
|u| rxpξ
p x
dx,
|u| rx
px≥ min r1
r xpx , r2
r xpx
1.13
Remark 1.5 If rx r const., then
|u| r
px
r
rp x 1.14 For simplicity of notation, we write
X W01,px Ω, X∗W01,pxΩ∗, Y L qx Ω, Y∗ L qx Ω,
1.15
In 4 , a topological method, based on the fundamental properties of the
Leray-Schauder degree, is used in proving the existence of a week solution in X to the Dirichlet
problemP that is an adaptation of that used by Dinca et al for Dirichlet problems with
classical p-Laplacian 5 In this work, we use the nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder and give the existence of a solution and its localization This method is used for finding solutions
in H ¨older spaces, while in6 , solutions are found in Sobolev spaces
Let us recall some results borrowed from Dinca 4 about px-Laplacian and Nemytskii operator Nf Firstly, since qx < px < p∗x for all x ∈ Ω, X is compactly embedded in Y Denote by i the compact injection of X in Y and by i∗ : Y∗ → X∗, i∗υ υ ◦ i
for all υ ∈ Y∗, its adjoint
Since the Caratheodory function f satisfies CAR, the Nemytskii operator Nf generated by f, Nf ux fx, ux, is well defined from Y into Y∗, continuous, and bounded3, Proposition 2.2 In order to prove that problem P has a weak solution in
X it is sufficient to prove that the equation
−Δpxu
i∗N f i
has a solution in X.
Trang 5Indeed, if u ∈ X satisfies 1.16 then, for all υ ∈ X, one has
−Δpxu, υ
X,X∗ i∗N f i
u, υ
X,X∗N f iu, iυY,Y∗ 1.17 which rewrites as
Ω|∇u| px ∇u∇υdx
and tells us that u is a weak solution in X to problem P.
Since−Δpxis a homeomorphism of X onto X∗, 1.16 may be equivalently written as
u
−Δpx−1i∗N f i
Thus, proving that problemP has a weak solution in X reduces to proving that the
compact operator
K
−Δpx−1i∗N f i
has a fixed point
Theorem 1.6 Alternative of Leray-Schauder, 7 Let B0, R denote the closed ball in a Banach
i the equation λKu u has a solution in B0, R for λ 1 or
2 Main Results
In this work, we present new existence and localization results for X-solutions to problem P, underCAR condition on f Our approach is based on regularity results for the solutions of
Dirichlet problems and again on the nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder
We start with an existence and localization principle for problemP
X / R for any
solution u ∈ X to
−Δpxu λf x, u in Ω,
Proof By 3, Theorem 3.1 , −Δpx is a homeomorphism of X onto X∗ We will apply
Theorem 2.1to E X and to operator K : X → X,
Ku
−Δpx−1i∗N f i
Trang 6where i∗N f i : X → X∗ is given byNf ux fx, ux Notice that, according to a
well-known regularity result4 , the operator −Δpx−1from X to X is well defined, continuous, and order preserving Consequently, K is a compact operator On the other hand, it is clear that the fixed points of K are the solutions of problem P Now the conclusion follows from
Theorem 1.6since conditionii is excluded by hypothesis
Theorem 2.2immediately yields the following existence and localization result
Theorem 2.2 Let Ω ⊂ R N , N ≥ 2, be a smooth bounded domain and let p, q ∈ CΩ be such that
qx < px for all x ∈ Ω Assume that f : Ω × R → R is a Caratheodory function which satisfies
the growth condition (CAR).
Suppose, in addition, that
C ∗ Y∗→ X∗max q1−1
X → Y , q X → Y2−1 < 1, 2.2
where C is the constant appearing in condition (CAR) Let R ≥ 1 be a constant such that
R ≥
⎛
⎜ ∗ Y∗→ X∗ Y∗
1 ∗ Y∗→ X∗max q1−1
X → Y , q X → Y2−1
⎞
⎟
1/p1−1
Proof Let u ∈ X be a solution of problem P λ X R ≥ 1, corresponding to some
λ ∈ 0, 1 Then by Propositions1.2,1.3, andLemma 1.4, we obtain
p1
X ≤
Ω|∇u| px
dx λ
i∗N f i
u, u
X,X∗ λN f iu, iuY,Y∗
∗
Y∗→ X∗N f iu
Y∗ X
∗
Y∗→ X∗ X
Y∗ C max q1−1
Y , q Y2−1
∗
Y∗→ X∗ X
Y∗ q2−1
X max q1−1
X → Y , q X → Y2−1
∗
Y∗→ X∗ X
Y∗ p1−1
X max q1−1
X → Y , q X → Y2−1 .
2.4
Therefore, we have
p1−1
X ≤ λ ∗ Y∗→ X∗ Y∗
1 ∗ Y∗→ X∗max q1−1
X → Y , q X → Y2−1 2.5
Trang 7Substituting X R in the above inequality, we obtain
R ≤
⎛
⎜ λ ∗ Y∗→ X∗ Y∗
1 ∗ Y∗→ X∗max q1−1
X → Y , q X → Y2−1
⎞
⎟
1/p1−1
, 2.6
which, taking into account2.3 and λ ∈ 0, 1, gives
R ≤ λ 1/p1−1
⎛
⎜ ∗ Y∗→ X∗ Y∗
1 ∗ Y∗→ X∗max q1−1
X → Y , q X → Y2−1
⎞
⎟
1/p1−1
≤ λ 1/p1−1
⎛
⎜ ∗ Y∗→ X∗ Y∗
1 ∗ Y∗→ X∗max q1−1
X → Y , q X → Y2−1
⎞
⎟
1/p1−1
≤ λ 1/p1−1 R < R,
2.7
a contradiction.Theorem 2.1applies
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the referees for their valuable and useful comments
References
1 X Fan and D Zhao, “On the spaces L px Ω and W m,px Ω,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and
Applications, vol 263, no 2, pp 424–446, 2001.
2 O Kov´aˇcik and J R´akosn´ık, “On spaces L px and W k,px ,” Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, vol.
41116, no 4, pp 592–618, 1991
3 X.-L Fan and Q.-H Zhang, “Existence of solutions for px-Laplacian Dirichlet problem,” Nonlinear
Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol 52, no 8, pp 1843–1852, 2003.
4 G Dinca, “A fixed point method for the px-Laplacian,” Comptes Rendus Math´ematique, vol 347, no.
13-14, pp 757–762, 2009
5 G Dinca, P Jebelean, and J Mawhin, “Variational and topological methods for Dirichlet problems with
p-Laplacian,” Portugaliae Mathematica, vol 58, no 3, pp 339–378, 2001.
6 D O’Regan and R Precup, Theorems of Leray-Schauder Type and Applications, vol 3 of Series in
Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001.
7 J Dugundji and A Granas, Fixed Point Theory I, vol 61 of Monografie Matematyczne, PWN-Polish
Scientific, Warsaw, Poland, 1982
... < /p>p x < /p>
< /p>
< /p>
< /p>
< /p>
p x < /p>
dx < /p>
< /p>
< /p>
Ω < /p>
< /p>
< /p>
r x p x ... r x p x |u| < /p>
< /p>
< /p>
< /p>
r x p x r x p x < /p>
r x p x < /p>
< /p>
|u| r x p x ... r x p x < /p>
p x < /p>
dx < /p>
≤ < /p>
< /p>
Ω < /p>
< /p>
< /p>
r x p x |u| < /p>