Volume 2010, Article ID 973731, 22 pagesdoi:10.1155/2010/973731 Research Article Solutions and Green’s Functions for Boundary Value Problems of Second-Order Four-Point Functional Differe
Trang 1Volume 2010, Article ID 973731, 22 pages
doi:10.1155/2010/973731
Research Article
Solutions and Green’s Functions for
Boundary Value Problems of Second-Order
Four-Point Functional Difference Equations
Yang Shujie and Shi Bao
Institute of Systems Science and Mathematics, Naval Aeronautical and Astronautical University, Yantai, Shandong 264001, China
Correspondence should be addressed to Yang Shujie,yangshujie@163.com
Received 23 April 2010; Accepted 11 July 2010
Academic Editor: Irena Rach ˚unkov´a
Copyrightq 2010 Y Shujie and S Bao This is an open access article distributed under the CreativeCommons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction inany medium, provided the original work is properly cited
We consider the Green’s functions and the existence of positive solutions for a second-orderfunctional difference equation with four-point boundary conditions
1 Introduction
In recent years, boundary value problems BVPs of differential and difference equationshave been studied widely and there are many excellent resultssee Gai et al 1, Guo andTian2, Henderson and Peterson 3, and Yang et al 4 By using the critical point theory,Deng and Shi5 studied the existence and multiplicity of the boundary value problems to aclass of second-order functional difference equations
Lu n fn, u n1, u n , u n−1 1.1with boundary value conditions
where the operator L is the Jacobi operator
Lu n a n u n1 a n−1u n−1 b n u n 1.3
Trang 2Ntouyas et al.6 and Wong 7 investigated the existence of solutions of a BVP forfunctional differential equations
Yang et al 9 considered two-point BVP of the following functional difference
equation with p-Laplacian operator:
For any real function x defined on the interval −τ, T and any t ∈ 0, T with T ∈ N,
we denote by x t an element of C τ defined by x t k xt k, k ∈ −τ, 0.
Trang 3In this paper, we consider the following second-order four-point BVP of a nonlinearfunctional difference equation:
At this point, it is necessary to make some remarks on the first boundary condition in
1.9 This condition is a generalization of the classical condition
u 0 αuη
from ordinary difference equations Here this condition connects the history u0with the single
u η This is suggested by the well-posedness of BVP 1.9, since the function f depends on the term u t i.e., past values of u.
As usual, a sequence{u−τ, , uT 1} is said to be a positive solution of BVP 1.9
if it satisfies BVP1.9 and uk ≥ 0 for k ∈ −τ, T with uk > 0 for k ∈ 1, T.
2 The Green’s Function of 1.9
First we consider the nonexistence of positive solutions of1.9 We have the following result
Lemma 2.1 Assume that
or
α
T 1 − η> T 1. 2.2
Then1.9 has no positive solution.
Proof FromΔ2u t − 1 −rtft, u t ≤ 0, we know that ut is convex for t ∈ 0, T 1 Assume that xt is a positive solution of 1.9 and 2.1 holds
1 Consider that γ 0.
Trang 4If xT 1 > 0, then xξ > 0 It follows that
which is a contradiction to the convexity of xt.
If xT 1 0, then xξ 0 If x0 > 0, then we have
which is a contradiction to the convexity of xt.
If t0∈ ξ, T, similar to the above proof, we can also get a contradiction.
2 Consider that γ > 0.
Trang 5which is a contradiction to the convexity of xt.
Assume that xt is a positive solution of 1.9 and 2.2 holds
which is a contradiction to the convexity of xt.
If xη > 0, similar to the above proof, we can also get a contradiction.
If xT 1 xη 0, and so x0 0, then there exists a t0 ∈ 1, η ∪ η, T such that
x t0 > 0 Otherwise, xt ≡ 0 is a trivial solution Assume that t0 ∈ 1, η, then
A contradiction to the convexity of xt follows.
If t0∈ η, T, we can also get a contradiction.
2 Consider that h0 > 0.
Trang 6which is a contradiction to the convexity of xt.
Next, we consider the existence of the Green’s function of equation
Motivated by Zhao10, we have the following conclusions
Theorem 2.2 The Green’s function for second-order four-point linear BVP 2.13 is given by
Trang 7It is easy to find that the solution of BVP2.16 is given by
where c and d are constants that will be determined.
From2.18 and 2.20, we have
Trang 8The four-point BVP2.13 can be obtained from replacing uT 1 0 by uT 1 βuξ in
2.19 Thus we suppose that the solution of 2.13 can be expressed by
w t vt a btvξ, 2.25
where a and b are constants that will be determined.
From2.24 and 2.25, we get
Trang 9Remark 2.3 ByH1, we can see that G1t, s > 0 for t, s ∈ 0, T 12 Let
m min
t,s∈1,T2G1t, s, M max
t,s∈1,T2G1t, s. 2.30
Then M ≥ m > 0.
solution which is given in2.29.
Proof We need only to show the uniqueness.
Obviously, wt in 2.29 is a solution of BVP 2.13 Assume that vt is another
αηc1− 1 − αc2 0,
T 1 − βξc11− βc2 0. 2.36
ConditionH1 implies that 2.36 has a unique solution c1 c2 0 Therefore vt ≡ wt for
t ∈ −τ, T 1 This completes the proof of the uniqueness of the solution.
Trang 103 Existence of Positive Solutions
In this section, we discuss the BVP1.9
K p {u ∈ K | u p} Furthermore, assume that Φ : K → K is a completely continuous operator
and Φu / u for u ∈ ∂K p {u ∈ K | u p} Thus, one has the following conclusions:
(1) if u ≤ Φu for u ∈ ∂K p , then i Φ, K p , K 0;
(2) if u ≥ Φu for u ∈ ∂K p , then i Φ, K p , K 1.
Assume that f≡ 0 Then 3.1 may be rewritten as
Trang 11Let ut be a solution of BVP 3.1 and yt ut − ut Then for t ∈ 1, T we have
Then E is a Banach space endowed with norm · and K is a cone in E.
For y ∈ K, we have by H1 and the definition of K,
Trang 12Proof For s ∈ τ 1, T, k ∈ −τ, 0, and s k ∈ 1, T, by the definitions of · τand · , wehave
Lemma 3.3 Consider that ΦK ⊂ K.
Proof If t ∈ −τ, 0 and t T 1, Φyt αΦη and ΦyT 1 βΦξ, respectively Thus,
Trang 13Lemma 3.4 Suppose that (H1) holds Then Φ : K → K is completely continuous.
We have the following main results
Theorem 3.5 Assume that (H1)–(H3) hold Then BVP3.1 has at least one positive solution if the
following conditions are satisfied:
H4 there exists a p1> h such that, for s ∈ 1, T, if φ τ ≤ p1 h, then fs, φ ≤ R1p1;
H5 there exists a p2> p1such that, for s ∈ 1, T, if φ τ ≥ m/Mp2, then f s, φ ≥ R2p2
or
H61 > α > 0;
H7 there exists a 0 < r1 < p1such that, for s ∈ 1, T, if φ τ ≤ r1, then f s, φ ≥ R2r1;
H8 there exists an r2 ≥ max{p2 h, Mh/mα}, such that, for s ∈ 1, T, if φ τ ≥
Trang 14For every y ∈ ∂K p2, by3.8–3.10 andLemma 3.2, we have, for s ∈ τ 1, T, y s τ ≥
m/My m/Mp2 Then by3.13 and H5, we have
Consequently, u1 y1 u or u2 y2 u is a positive solution of BVP 3.1
Theorem 3.6 Assume that (H1)–(H3) hold Then BVP3.1 has at least one positive solution if (H4) and (H7) or (H5) and (H8) hold.
Theorem 3.7 Assume that (H1)–( H3) hold Then BVP3.1 has at least two positive solutions if
(H4), (H5), and (H7) or (H4), (H5), and (H8) hold.
Trang 15Theorem 3.8 Assume that (H1)–(H3) hold Then BVP3.1 has at least three positive solutions if
Trang 16Then by3.27, H9, H10, and the definition of Ht, we have Ft, w t > 0 for t ∈
1, T Thus, the BVP 1.9 can be changed into the following BVP:
Trang 18Theorem 4.1 Assume that (H1), (H2), (H6),
Proof Assume that conditionH12 holds If λ > 1/mrf0and f0 < ∞, there exists an > 0
sufficiently small, such that
Trang 19r > max {r1, h/μα }, such that, for t ∈ 1, T and φ ≥ r,
f
t, φ
<
f∞ 1φ. 4.16
We now show that there is r2 ≥ r, such that, for y ∈ ∂K r2,Φy ≤ y In fact, for
s ∈ 1, T r2 ≥ Mr/mα and every y ∈ ∂K r , δy ≥ y s u s τ ≥ r; hence in a similar way,
Trang 20It follows that we can take λ0 r − h/MLT
s1r s > 0 such that, for all 0 < λ ≤ λ0and all
Trang 21For every y ∈ ∂K R, by the definition of·, ·τand the definition ofLemma 3.2, there
exists a t0∈ τ 1, T such that y y t0τ R and u t0 0, thus y t0 u t0τ ≥ R Hence
which by combining with4.21 completes the proof
Example 4.3 Consider the BVP3.33 inExample 3.9with
where s φ τ , A is some positive constant, p2 40, m 21/24, and M 163/40.
By calculation, f0 A, f∞ πA/2000, and r 1/120; let δ 1 Then by Theorem4.1,
for λ ∈ 2608/49A, 640000/163πA, the above equation has at least one positive solution.
Trang 221 M J Gai, B Shi, and D C Zhang, “Boundary value problems for second-order singular functional
differential equations,” Chinese Annals of Mathematics, vol 23A, no 6, pp 1–10, 2001 Chinese.
2 Y Guo and J Tian, “Two positive solutions for second-order quasilinear differential equation
boundary value problems with sign changing nonlinearities,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol 169, no 2, pp 345–357, 2004.
3 J Henderson and A Peterson, “Boundary value problems for functional difference equations,”
Applied Mathematics Letters, vol 9, no 3, pp 57–61, 1996.
4 S J Yang, B Shi, and M J Gai, “Boundary value problems for functional differential systems,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol 36, no 12, pp 685–705, 2005.
5 X Deng and H Shi, “On boundary value problems for second order nonlinear functional difference
equations,” Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, vol 110, no 3, pp 1277–1287, 2009.
6 S K Ntouyas, Y G Sficas, and P Ch Tsamatos, “Boundary value problems for functional-differential
equations,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol 199, no 1, pp 213–230, 1996.
7 F.-H Wong, “Existence of positive solutions for m-Laplacian boundary value problems,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol 12, no 3, pp 11–17, 1999.
8 P X Weng and Z H Guo, “Existence of positive solutions to BVPs for a nonlinear functionaldifference equation with p-Laplacian operator,” Acta Mathematica Sinica, vol 49, no 1, pp 187–194,2006
9 S J Yang, B Shi, and D C Zhang, “Existence of positive solutions for boundary value problems
of nonlinear functional difference equation with p-Laplacian operator,” Boundary Value Problems, vol
2007, Article ID 38230, 12 pages, 2007
10 Z Zhao, “Solutions and Green’s functions for some linear second-order three-point boundary value
problems,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol 56, no 1, pp 104–113, 2008Chinese
11 D J Guo, J X Sun, and Z L Liu, Functional Methods of Nonlinear Ordinary Differential Equations,
Shandong Science and Technology Press, Jinan, China, 1995