By employing upper and lower solutions method together with maximal principle, we establish anecessary and sufficient condition for the existence of pseudo-C30, 1 as well as C20, 1 positiv
Trang 1Volume 2010, Article ID 862079, 23 pages
doi:10.1155/2010/862079
Research Article
Positive Solutions for Fourth-Order Singular
p-Laplacian Differential Equations with Integral
Boundary Conditions
Xingqiu Zhang1, 2 and Yujun Cui3
1 Department of Mathematics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan,
Hubei 430074, China
2 Department of Mathematics, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, Shandong 252059, China
3 Department of Applied Mathematics, Shandong University of Science and Technology,
Qingdao 266510, China
Received 7 April 2010; Accepted 12 August 2010
Academic Editor: Claudianor O Alves
Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, andreproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
By employing upper and lower solutions method together with maximal principle, we establish anecessary and sufficient condition for the existence of pseudo-C30, 1 as well as C20, 1 positive solutions for fourth-order singular p-Laplacian differential equations with integral boundary conditions Our nonlinearity f may be singular at t 0, t 1, and u 0 The dual results for
the other integral boundary condition are also given
1 Introduction
In this paper, we consider the existence of positive solutions for the following nonlinear
fourth-order singular p-Laplacian differential equations with integral boundary conditions:
ϕ p
xt ft, xt, xt, 0 < t < 1, x0
Trang 20hsds < 1 and nonlinear term f satisfies the following hypothesis:
H ft, u, v : J × R × R → R is continuous, nondecreasing on u and nonincreasing
on v for each fixed t ∈ J, and there exists a real number b ∈ R such that, for any
Remark 1.2 Typical functions that satisfy condition H are those taking the form ft, u, v
n i1 a i tu λ i m j1 b j tu −μ j , where a i , b j ∈ C0, 1, 0 < λ i < 1, μ j > 0 i 1, 2, , m;
ft, v, v, if u ≥ v ≥ 0,
v u
b
ft, v, v, if v ≥ u ≥ 0.
1.6
Trang 3Boundary value problems with integral boundary conditions arise in variety ofdifferent areas of applied mathematics and physics For example, heat conduction, chemicalengineering, underground water flow, thermoelasticity, and plasma physics can be reduced
to nonlocal problems with integral boundary conditions They include two point, three point,and nonlocal boundary value problemssee 2 5 as special cases and have attracted muchattention of many researchers, such as Gallardo, Karakostas, Tsamatos, Lomtatidze, Malaguti,Yang, Zhang, and Fengsee 6 13, e.g. For more information about the general theory ofintegral equations and their relation to boundary value problems, the reader is referred to thebook by Corduneanu14 and Agarwal and O’Regan 15
Recently, Zhang et al 13 studied the existence and nonexistence of symmetricpositive solutions for the following nonlinear fourth-order boundary value problems:
ϕ p
xt ωtft, xt, 0 < t < 1, x0 x1
ft, u, v permits singularity not only at t 0, 1 but also at v 0 By singularity, we mean that the function f is allowed to be unbounded at the points t 0, 1 and v 0.
2 Preliminaries and Several Lemmas
A function xt ∈ C20, 1 and ϕ p xt ∈ C20, 1 is called a C20, 1 positive solution of
BVP1.1 if it satisfies 1.1 xt > 0 for t ∈ 0, 1 A C20, 1 positive solution of 1.1 is
called a psuedo-C30, 1 positive solution if ϕ p xt ∈ C10, 1 xt > 0, −xt > 0 for
t ∈ 0, 1 Denote that
E x : x ∈ C20, 1, and ϕ p
xt∈ C20, 1. 2.1
Trang 4Definition 2.1 A function αt ∈ E is called a lower solution of BVP 1.1 if αt satisfies
ϕ p
αt≤ ft, αt, αt, 0 < t < 1, α0 −
To prove the main results, we need the following maximum principle
Lemma 2.3 Maximum principle If x ∈ F k , such that ϕ p xt ≥ 0, t ∈ a k , b k , then xt ≥ 0, −xt ≥ 0, t ∈ a k , b k .
Trang 5zt za k za k t − a k −
t
a t − sσsds. 2.15
Trang 6Let t b kin2.15, we obtain that
Trang 7Substituting2.20 into 2.17, we have
Obviously, G k t, s ≥ 0, K k t, s ≥ 0, σ 2k ≥ 0 From 2.21, it is easily seen that zt ≥ 0 for
t ∈ a k , b k By 2.11, we know that ϕ p yt ≥ 0, that is, yt ≥ 0 Thus, we have proved that
−xt ≥ 0, t ∈ a k , b k Similarly, the solution of 2.5 and 2.7 can be expressed by
Trang 8Lemma 2.4 Suppose that H holds Let xt be a C20, 1 positive solution of BVP 1.1 Then there exist two constants 0 < I1< I2such that
It is easy to see that
Lemma 2.5 Suppose that H holds And assume that there exist lower and upper solutions of BVP
1.1, respectively, αt and βt, such that αt, βt ∈ E, 0 ≤ αt ≤ βt for t ∈ 0, 1, α1 β1 0 Then BVP 1.1 has at least one C20, 1 positive solution xt such that αt ≤ xt ≤ βt,
t ∈ 0, 1 If, in addition, there exists Ft ∈ L10, 1 such that
ft,x,x ≤ Ft, for αt ≤ xt ≤ βt, 2.32
Trang 9then the solution xt of BVP 1.1 is a pseudo-C30, 1 positive solution.
Proof For each k, for all xt ∈ E k {x : x ∈ C2a k , b k , and ϕ p xt ∈ C2a k , b k}, wedefined an auxiliary function
f
t, βt, βt, if xt ≥ βt.
2.33
By conditionH, we have that F k : E k → 0, ∞ is continuous.
Let{a k }, {b k } be sequences satisfying 0 < · · · < a k 1 < a k < · · · < a1 < b1 < · · · < b k <
b k 1 < · · · < 1, a k → 0 and b k → 1 as k → ∞, and let {r ki }, i 1, 2, 3, be sequences satisfying
Trang 10For convenience, we define linear operators as follows:
compact operator and A k ϕ−1
p B k E k is a relatively compact set So, A k ϕ−1
p B k F k : E k →
E k is a completely continuous operator In addition, x ∈ E k is a solution of2.35 if and
only if x is a fixed point of operator A k ϕ−1
p B k F k x x Using the Shauder’s fixed point theorem, we assert that A k ϕ−1
p B k F k has at least one fixed point x k ∈ C2a k , b k , by x k t
A k ϕ−1
p B k F k x k t, we can get ϕ p x k ∈ C2a k , b k .
We claim that
αt ≤ x k t ≤ βt, t ∈ a k , b k . 2.38From this it follows that
ϕ p
x
k t ft, βt, βt, t ∈ a k , b k . 2.41
Trang 11On the other hand, since βt is an upper solution of 1.1, we also have
ϕ p
βt≥ ft, βt, βt, t ∈ a k , b k . 2.42Then setting
−βt − x
k t≥ 0, t ∈ a k , b k . 2.46Set
ut βt − x k t, t ∈ a k , b k . 2.47Then
−ut ≥ 0, t ∈ a k , b k , x ∈ C2a k , b k , ua k −
In addition, if2.32 holds, then |ϕ p xt| ≤ Ft Hence, ϕ p xtis absolutelyintegrable on0, 1 This implies that xt is a pseudo-C30, 1 positive solution of 1.1
Trang 123 The Main Results
Theorem 3.1 Suppose that H holds, then a necessary and sufficient condition for BVP 1.1 to have a pseudo-C30, 1 positive solution is that the following integral condition holds:
0 <
1
0fs, 1 − s, 1 − sds < ∞. 3.1
Proof The proof is divided into two parts, necessity and suffeciency.
Necessity Suppose that xt is a pseudo-C30, 1 positive solution of 1.1 Then both
Trang 13It follows from3.3 and 3.6 that
0 <
1
0fs, 1 − s, 1 − sds < ∞, 3.7which is the desired inequality
Sufficiency First, we prove the existence of a pair of upper and lower solutions Since ξl/l2
It is easy to know from3.11 and 3.12 that ϕ p −bt ∈ C10, 1 ByLemma 2.4, we know
that there exists a positive number k < 1 such that
l1k1
−l1
1 ≤ 0. 3.15
Trang 14αt l1b1t, βt l1
1
b1t, t ∈ 0, 1. 3.16Thus, from3.14 and 3.16, we have
l1k1
l1k1−b ft, 1 − t, 1 − t Ft.
3.20
Trang 15From3.1, we have1
0Ftdt < ∞ So, it follows fromLemma 2.5that BVP1.1 admits a
pseudo-C30, 1 positive solution such that αt ≤ xt ≤ βt.
Remark 3.2 Lin et al.23,24 considered the existence and uniqueness of solutions for somefourth-order andk, n − k conjugate boundary value problems when ft, u, v qtgu hv, where
g : 0, ∞ −→ 0, ∞ is continuous and nondecreasing,
h : 0, ∞ −→ 0, ∞ is continuous and nonincreasing, 3.21
under the following condition:
P1 for t ∈ 0, 1 and u, v > 0, there exists α ∈ 0, 1 such that
Obviously, 3.21-3.22 imply condition P2 and condition P2 implies condition
H So, condition H is weaker than conditions P1 and P2 Thus, functions considered inthis paper are wider than those in23–26
In the following, when ft, u, u admits the form ft, u, that is, nonlinear term f is not mixed monotone on u, but monotone with respect u, BVP1.1 becomes
ϕ p
xt ft, xt, 0 < t < 1, x0
If f t, u satisfies one of the following:
H∗ ft, u : J × R → R is continuous, nondecreasing on u, for each fixed t ∈ 0, 1, there exists a function ξ : 1, ∞ → R , ξl < l and ξl/l2is integrable on1, ∞
such that
ft, lu ≤ ξlft, u, ∀t, u ∈ J × R , l ∈ 1, ∞. 3.24
Trang 16Theorem 3.3 Suppose that H∗ holds, then a necessary and sufficient condition for BVP 3.23 to have a pseudo-C30, 1 positive solution is that the following integral condition holds
0 <
1
0fs, 1 − sds < ∞. 3.25
Proof The proof is similar to that ofTheorem 3.1; we omit the details
Theorem 3.4 Suppose that H∗ holds, then a necessary and sufficient condition for problem 3.23
to have a C20, 1 positive solution is that the following integral condition holds
0 <
1
0
s1 − sfs, 1 − sds < ∞. 3.26
Proof The proof is divided into two parts, necessity and suffeciency.
Necessity Assume that xt is a C20, 1 positive solution of BVP 3.23 ByLemma 2.4, there
exist two constants I1and I2, 0 < I1< I2, such that
Trang 18Sufficiency Suppose that 3.26 holds Let
Thus,3.12, 3.39, and 3.40 imply that 0 ≤ b2t < ∞ ByLemma 2.4, we know that there
exists a positive number k2< 1 such that
l2k2
− 1
l2 ≤ 0. 3.42Let
αt l2b2t, βt 1
l2
b2t, t ∈ 0, 1. 3.43Thus, from3.41 and 3.43, we have
l2
ft, 1 − t ≤
1
Trang 19From3.39 and 3.43, it follows that
From the first conclusion ofLemma 2.5, we conclude that problem1.1 has at least
one C20, 1 positive solution xt.
Trang 20By analogous methods, we have the following results.
Assume that xt is a C20, 1 positive solution of problem 4.1 Then xt can be
Trang 21If xt is a C20, 1 positive solution of problem 4.8 Then xt can be expressed by
Trang 22If xt is a C20, 1 positive solution of problem 4.15 Then xt can be expressed by
xt A1ϕ−1
p B2ft, xt, xt. 4.18
Theorem 4.7 Suppose that H holds, then a necessary and sufficient condition for problem 4.15
to have a pseudo-C30, 1 positive solution is that the following integral condition holds:
0 <
1
0fs, s, sds < ∞. 4.19
Theorem 4.8 Suppose that H∗ holds, then a necessary and sufficient condition for problem 4.16
to have a pseudo-C30, 1 positive solution is that the following integral condition holds:
0 <
1
0
fs, sds < ∞. 4.20
Theorem 4.9 Suppose that H∗ holds, then a necessary and sufficient condition for problem 4.16
to have a C20, 1 positive solution is that the following integral condition holds:
1 X Du and Z Zhao, “Existence and uniqueness of smooth positive solutions to a class of singular
m-point boundary value problems,” Boundary Value Problems, vol 2009, Article ID 191627, 13 pages,
2009
2 J R Graef and J R L Webb, “Third order boundary value problems with nonlocal boundary
conditions,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol 71, no 5-6, pp 1542–1551, 2009.
3 J R Graef and B Yang, “Positive solutions of a third order nonlocal boundary value problem,”
Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems Series S, vol 1, no 1, pp 89–97, 2008.
4 G Infante and J R L Webb, “Nonlinear non-local boundary-value problems and perturbed
Hammerstein integral equations,” Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society Series II, vol 49,
no 3, pp 637–656, 2006
5 J R L Webb and G Infante, “Positive solutions of nonlocal boundary value problems: a unified
approach,” Journal of the London Mathematical Society Second Series, vol 74, no 3, pp 673–693, 2006.
6 J M Gallardo, “Second-order differential operators with integral boundary conditions and
generation of analytic semigroups,” The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, vol 30, no 4, pp.
1265–1292, 2000
7 G L Karakostas and P Ch Tsamatos, “Multiple positive solutions of some Fredholm integral
equations arisen from nonlocal boundary-value problems,” Electronic Journal of Di fferential Equations,
no 30, pp 1–17, 2002
Trang 238 A Lomtatidze and L Malaguti, “On a nonlocal boundary value problem for second order nonlinearsingular differential equations,” Georgian Mathematical Journal, vol 7, no 1, pp 133–154, 2000.
9 Z Yang, “Positive solutions to a system of second-order nonlocal boundary value problems,”
Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol 62, no 7, pp 1251–1265, 2005.
10 Z Yang, “Existence and nonexistence results for positive solutions of an integral boundary value
problem,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol 65, no 8, pp 1489–1511, 2006.
11 Z Yang, “Positive solutions of a second-order integral boundary value problem,” Journal of
Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol 321, no 2, pp 751–765, 2006.
12 M Feng, D Ji, and W Ge, “Positive solutions for a class of boundary-value problem with integral
boundary conditions in Banach spaces,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol 222, no.
15 R P Agarwal and D O’Regan, Infinite Interval Problems for Differential, Difference and Integral Equations,
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001
16 Z Wei, “Positive solutions for 2nth-order singular sub-linear m-point boundary value problems,”
Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol 182, no 2, pp 1280–1295, 2006.
17 Z Wei, “A necessary and sufficient condition for 2nth-order singular super-linear m-point boundary value problems,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol 327, no 2, pp 930–947, 2007.
18 X Du and Z Zhao, “A necessary and sufficient condition of the existence of positive solutions to
singular sublinear three-point boundary value problems,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol.
186, no 1, pp 404–413, 2007
19 J R Graef and L Kong, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of symmetric positive
solutions of singular boundary value problems,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol.
331, no 2, pp 1467–1484, 2007
20 X Zhang and L Liu, “A necessary and sufficient condition for positive solutions for fourth-order
multi-point boundary value problems with p-Laplacian,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &
Applications, vol 68, no 10, pp 3127–3137, 2008.
21 Y Zhang, “Positive solutions of singular sublinear Emden-Fowler boundary value problems,” Journal
of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol 185, no 1, pp 215–222, 1994.
22 P Hartman, Ordinary Differential Equations, Birkh¨auser, Boston, Mass, USA, 2nd edition, 1982.
23 X Lin, D Jiang, and X Li, “Existence and uniqueness of solutions for singular fourth-order boundary
value problems,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol 196, no 1, pp 155–161, 2006.
24 X Lin, D Jiang, and X Li, “Existence and uniqueness of solutions for singular k, n − k conjugate boundary value problems,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol 52, no 3-4, pp 375–382,
2006
25 P Lei, X Lin, and D Jiang, “Existence and uniqueness of positive solutions for singular nonlinear
elliptic boundary value problems,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol 69, no 9,
pp 2773–2779, 2008
26 Y Liu and H Yu, “Existence and uniqueness of positive solution for singular boundary value
problem,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol 50, no 1-2, pp 133–143, 2005.