Volume 2010, Article ID 208085, 23 pagesdoi:10.1155/2010/208085 Research Article The Boundary Value Problem of the Equations with Nonnegative Characteristic Form Limei Li and Tian Ma Mat
Trang 1Volume 2010, Article ID 208085, 23 pages
doi:10.1155/2010/208085
Research Article
The Boundary Value Problem of the Equations with Nonnegative Characteristic Form
Limei Li and Tian Ma
Mathematical College, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
Correspondence should be addressed to Limei Li,matlilm@yahoo.cnand
Tian Ma,matian56@sina.com
Received 22 May 2010; Accepted 7 July 2010
Academic Editor: Claudianor Alves
Copyrightq 2010 L Li and T Ma This is an open access article distributed under the CreativeCommons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction inany medium, provided the original work is properly cited
We study the generalized Keldys-Fichera boundary value problem for a class of higher order tions with nonnegative characteristic By using the acute angle principle and the H ¨older inequali-ties and Young inequalities we discuss the existence of the weak solution Then by using the inverse
equa-H ¨older inequalities, we obtain the regularity of the weak solution in the anisotropic Sobolev space
1 Introduction
Keldys1 studies the boundary problem for linear elliptic equations with degenerationg onthe boundary For the linear elliptic equations with nonnegative characteristic forms, Oleinikand Radkevich2 had discussed the Keldys-Fichera boundary value problem In 1989, Maand Yu3 studied the existence of weak solution for the Keldys-Fichera boundary value ofthe nonlinear degenerate elliptic equations of second-order Chen 4 and Chen and Xuan
5, Li 6, and Wang 7 had investigated the existence and the regularity of degenerateelliptic equations by using different methods In this paper, we study the generalized Keldys-Fichera boundary value problem which is a kind of new boundary conditions for a class ofhigher-order equations with nonnegative characteristic form We discuss the existence anduniqueness of weak solution by using the acute angle principle, then study the regularity ofsolution by using inverse H ¨older inequalities in the anisotropic Sobolev Space
We firstly study the following linear partial differential operator
Trang 2where x ∈ Ω, Ω ⊂ R nis an open set, the coefficients of L are bounded measurable, and theleading term coefficients satisfy
k1b λ i λ j x · n k , −→n n1, , n n is the outward normal at ∂Ω {e i x} N m
i1and{h i x} N m−1
i1 are the eigenvalues of matrices Mx and Bx, respectively C B
ij x and C M ij x are orthogonal matrix satisfying
Trang 32 Formulation of the Boundary Value Problem
For second-order equations with nonnegative characteristic form, Keldys 1 and Ficherapresented a kind of boundary that is the Keldys-Fichera boundary value problem, with thatthe associated problem is of well-posedness However, for higher-order ones, the discussion
of well-posed boundary value problem has not been seen Here we will give a kind ofboundary value condition, which is consistent with Dirichlet problem if the equations areelliptic, and coincident with Keldys-Fichera boundary value problem when the equations are
Trang 4where Cx is the transposed matrix of Cx, {e i x} N m
i1 are the eigenvalues of Mx and {h i x} N m−1
i1 are the eigenvalues of Bx Denote by
For multiple indices α, β, α ≤ β means that α i ≤ β i , for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n Now let us consider the
following boundary value problem,
Trang 5We can see that the item 2.13 of boundary value condition is determined by theleading term matrix 2.2, and 2.12 is defined by the odd term matrix 2.6 Moreover, if
the operator L is a not elliptic, then the operator
∂4u
∂x2
1∂x2 2
∂3u
∂x3 2
− Δu f, x ∈ Ω ⊂ R2. 2.15
HereΩ {x1, x2 ∈ R2 | 0 < x1 < 1, 0 < x2 < 1 } Let α1 {2, 0}, α2 {1, 1} α3 {0, 2} and
λ1 {1, 0}, λ2 {0, 1}, then the leading and odd term matrices of 2.15 respectively are
Trang 6which implies that ∂u/∂x2is free onΓ {x1, x2 ∈ ∂Ω | 0 < x1< 1, x2 0}.
boundary value conditions relating to the operator L may not be unique.
2.11 and 2.12 remain
Trang 7Now we return to discuss the relations between the conditions 2.11–2.13 withDirichlet and Keldys-Fichera boundary value conditions.
It is easy to verify that the problem2.10–2.13 is the Dirichlet problem provided the
operator L being ellipticsee 11 In this case,M
i ∂Ω for all 1 ≤ i ≤ N m Besides,2.13run over all 1 ≤ i ≤ N m and δ k j ≤ α i , moreover C B x is nondegenerate for any x ∈ ∂Ω Solving the system of equations, we get D α u|∂Ω 0, for all |α| m − 1.
When m 1, namely, L is of second-order, the condition 2.12 is the form
Trang 8We denote by X2the completion of X under the norm 2and by X1 the completion of X
with the following norm
Let u be a classical solution of2.10–2.13 Denote by
Trang 9From the three equalities above we obtain2.30.
Let u ∈ X1 be a weak solution of2.10–2.13 Then the boundary value conditions
2.11 and 2.13 can be reflected by the space X1 In fact, we can show that if u ∈ X1, then u
Trang 10which means that2.35 holds true Since X is dense in X1, for u ∈ X1given, let u k ∈ X and
Due to u ksatisfying2.36, hence u ∈ X1satisfies2.36 Thus 2.31 is verified
D γ u|M
γ 0, forγ m − 1, 2.39
where M
γ {x ∈ ∂Ω | n
i1a γ δ iγ δ i x · n i2 > 0 } In this case, the corresponding trace
embedding theorem can be set, and the boundary value condition2.13 is naturally satisfied
On the other hand, if the weak solution u of2.10–2.13 belongs to X1∩ W m,pΩ for some
It remains to verify the condition2.12 Let u0 ∈ X1∩ W m 1,2Ω satisfy 2.30 Since
Trang 11Because the coefficients of L are sufficiently smooth, and C∞
i , one deduces that u0satisfies2.12 provided u0 ∈ X1∩ W m 1,2 Ω.
Finally, we discuss the well-posedness of the boundary value problem2.10–2.13
Let X be a linear space, and X1, X2be the completion of X, respectively, with the norm
1, 2 Suppose that X1is a reflexive Banach space and X2is a separable Banach space
Trang 12Theorem 2.8 existence theorem Let Ω ⊂ R n be an arbitrary open set, f ∈ L2Ω and b αγ ∈
C1Ω If there exist a constant C > 0 and g ∈ L1Ω such that
bounded linear operator L : X1 → X2 ∗ Hence L is weakly continuoussee 3 From 2.42,
for u ∈ X we drive that
−
$
C i
Trang 13Thus by H ¨older inequalitysee 13, we have
)
ByLemma 2.7, the theorem is proven
Theorem 2.9 uniqueness theorem Under the assumptions of Theorem 2.8 with g x 0 in
2.48 If the problem 2.10–2.13 has a weak solution in X1 ∩ W m,p Ω ∩ W m −1,q Ω1/p
1/q 1, then such a solution is unique Moreover, if b αγ x 0 in L, for all |α| m, |γ| m − 1,
then the weak solution u ∈ X1of2.10–2.13 is unique.
2.30 holds for all v ∈ X1∩ W m,p ∩ W m −1,q Ω Hence Lu0, u0is well defined Let u1 ∈ X1∩
W m,p ∩W m −1,qΩ Then from 2.49 it follows that < Lu1−Lu0, u1−u0 > 0, we obtain u1 u0,which means that the solution of2.10–2.13 in X1∩ W m,p ∩ W m −1,qΩ is unique If all the
odd terms b αγ x of L, then 2.30 holds for all v ∈ X1, in the same fashion we known that theweak solution of2.10–2.13 in X1is unique The proof is complete
Remark 2.10 In next subsection, we can see that under certain assumptions, the weak
solutions of degenerate elliptic equations are in X1∩W m,p Ω∩W m −1,q Ω1/p1/q 1.
3 Existence of Higher-Order Quasilinear Equations
Given the quasilinear differential operator
Trang 14We consider the following problem:
k, |α|≤k Ω to L p Ω, if q θis the largest number of the
exponent p in where D θ u ∈ L p Ω, for all u ∈ W p α
|α|≤kΩ, and the embedding is continuous.For example, whenΩ is bounded, the space X {u ∈ L k Ω | k ≥ 1, D i u ∈ L2Ω, 1 ≤
i L2 L k is an anisotropic Sobolev space, and the critical
embedding exponents from X to L P Ω are q i 21 ≤ i ≤ n, and q0 max{k, 2n/n − 2}.
Suppose that the following hold
A1 The coefficients of the leading term of A satisfy one of the following two conditions:
Trang 15A3 There are functions G i x, η i 0, 1, , n with G i x, 0 0, for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n, such
where f1∈ L1Ω, p0> 1, p λ > 1 or p λ 0, for all 1 ≤ |λ| ≤ m − 2.
A5 There is a constant c > 0 such that
m −1,|λ|≤m−1 Ω to L P Ω Let X be defined by 2.27 and X1be the completion of X
under the norm
Trang 16and X2be the completion of X with the norm
Theorem 3.1 Under the conditions A1 –A5, if f ∈ L p0
Ω, 1/p01/p0 1, then the problem
3.3 has a weak solution in X1.
Au, v defines a bounded mapping A : X1 → X2 ∗by the conditionA5
Let u ∈ X, by A2–A4, one can deduce that
−
$
C i
Trang 17In the following, we take an example to illustrate the application ofTheorem 3.1.
Example 3.2 We consider the boundary value problem of odd order equation as follows:
whereΩ is an unit ball in R2, seeFigure 2
The odd term matrix is
Trang 18ApplyingTheorem 3.1, if f ∈ L 4/3Ω, then the problem 3.15–3.18 has a weak solution
u ∈ W 1,2Ω
4. Wm,p-Solutions of Degenerate Elliptic Equations
We start with an abstract regularity result which is useful for the existence problem of
W m,p Ω-solutions of degenerate quasilinear elliptic equations of order 2m Let X, X1, X2bethe spaces defined in Definition 2.6, and Y be a reflective Banach space, at the same time
Y → X1
Lemma 4.1 Under the hypotheses of Lemma 2.7 , there exists a sequence of {u n } ⊂ X, u n u0in
Trang 19B1 The condition 3.6 holds, and there is a continuous function λx ≥ 0 on Ω such
where C is a constant, p0> 1, p λ > 1 or p λ 0 for 1 ≤ |λ| ≤ m − 1, f1∈ L1Ω
B4 The structure conditions are
Trang 20Definition 4.2 u∈ 3X1is a weak solution of4.2–4.5, if for any v ∈ X2, the following equalityholds:
Theorem 4.3 Under the assumptions B1 –B4, if f ∈ L p0
, then the problem and4.2–4.5 has a
weak solution u∈ 3X1 Moreover, if there is a real number δ ≥ 1, such that
$
then the weak solution u ∈ W m,pΩ ∩ 3X1, p 2δ/1 δ.
any u ∈ X X is as that inSection 3 with 3Au, u 0, we have
Trang 21Due toB1 and B3 we have
Trang 22From4.15 and 4.17, the estimates 4.12 follows This completes the proof.
Next, we consider a quasilinear equation
problem4.2–4.5 has a weak solution u ∈ W m,pΩ ∩ 3X1, p 2δ/1 δ.
The proof ofTheorem 4.4is parallel to that ofTheorem 4.3; here we omit the detail
Acknowledgment
This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China no.10971148
Trang 231 M V Keldys, “On certain cases of degeneration of equations of elliptic type on the boundry of a
domain,” Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, vol 77, pp 181–183, 1951.
2 O A Oleinik and E V Radkevich, Second Order Equation with Nonnegative Characteristic Form,
Plennum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1973
3 T Ma and Q Y Yu, “The Keldys-Fichera boundary value problems for degenerate quasilinear elliptic
equations of second order,” Di fferential and Integral Equations, vol 2, no 4, pp 379–388, 1989.
4 Z C Chen, “The Keldys-Fichera boundary value problem for a class of nonlinear degenerate elliptic
equations,” Acta Mathematica Sinica New Series, vol 9, no 2, pp 203–211, 1993.
5 Z.-C Chen and B.-J Xuan, “On the Keldys-Fichera boundary-value problem for degenerate
quasilinear elliptic equations,” Electronic Journal of Di fferential Equations, no 87, pp 1–13, 2002.
6 S H Li, “The first boundary value problem for quasilinear elliptic-parabolic equations with double
degenerate,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol 27, no 1, pp 115–124, 1996.
7 L Wang, “H¨older estimates for subelliptic operators,” Journal of Functional Analysis, vol 199, no 1,
pp 228–242, 2003
8 L M Li and T Ma, “Regularity of Keldys-Fichera boundary value problem for gegenerate elliptic
equations,” Chinese Annals of Mathematics, Series B, vol 31, no B5–6, pp 1–10, 2010
9 T Ma, Weakly continuous method and nonlinear differential equations with nonnegative characteristic form,
Doctoral thesis, 1989
10 T Ma and Q Y Yu, “Nonlinear partial differential equations and weakly continuous methed,” in
Nonlinear Analysis, W Chen, Ed., pp 118–213, Lanzhou Univ Press, 1990.
11 O A Ladyzhenskaya and N N Uraltseva, Linear and Quasilinear Equations of Elliptic Type, Izdat.
“Nauka”, Moscow, Russia, 2nd edition, 1973
12 D Gilbarg and N S Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, Grundlehren der
Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol 22, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1977
13 R Temam, Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics, vol 68 of Applied
Mathematical Sciences, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1988.
14 R A Adams, Sobolev Spaces, Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol 6, Academic Press, London, UK,
1975
... class="page_container" data-page="17">In the following, we take an example to illustrate the application ofTheorem 3.1.
Example 3.2 We consider the boundary value problem of odd order equation as follows:... δ.
The proof ofTheorem 4.4is parallel to that ofTheorem 4.3; here we omit the detail
Acknowledgment
This project was supported by the National Natural...
We start with an abstract regularity result which is useful for the existence problem of
W m,p Ω-solutions of degenerate quasilinear elliptic equations of order 2m