Báo cáo khoa học nông nghiệp " Evaluation of the Sawmiller Training Course Assessment " potx

Evaluation of the Sawmiller Training Course Assessment.. Course 3 Vinh Phuc Provence 14 Respondents... Apply to Vietnam b The training needs to be more suitable for enterprise.. e they

Evaluation of the Sawmiller Training Course Assessment

Course 3 Vinh Phuc Provence

14 Respondents

Question 1

This course was informative? Average 4.2

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

0 0 0 11 3

This course met your expectations? Average 4.2

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

0 0 1 9 4

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

0 0 0 11 3

The presenters were easily understood? Average 4.6

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

0 0 0 5 9

The information was well presented? Average 4.3

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

0 0 0 10 4

Question 2

Rate the topics in order of relevance (score 1-9)

a) Wood Science

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

b) Sawing

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

c) Timber Specifications

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

d) Saw blades

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

e) Drying

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

f) Preservation

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

g) Safety

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

h) Maintenance

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

i) Furniture requirements

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Question 3

Were there other topics that should be included?

a) There needs to be equipment in the training program Apply to Vietnam

b) The training needs to be more suitable for enterprise Training needs to be more suitable for the workforce

c) Would like more photos in teaching, with relation to the International Standards, More practice rather than theory,

d) The training was suitable for business

e) they have experience in sawing already

f) should build a mill where the people live

g) The standard model with relationship with Vietnamese people

h) Visit the sawmill to learn about the mills they use

i) Overall the concept is not suitable

j) Join the sawmills together in an area for strengthening cooperation

k) Intergrate theory with practice

l) How to desighn the workshop to be able to choose the most suitable machine

m) Like to visit different sawmills

n) More modern about sawmill and furniture

Question 4

What was the best part of the course?

a) Very Good

b) Work safety and preservation

c) Good

d) Wood science, wood classification, preservation, safety

e) Drying technology, sawing technology

f) Sawing technology, Forest plantation in Vietnam

g) All of training course, practice and business

h) Very good

i) Wood Preservation

j) Wood Preservation, sawing technology, technical

k) Wood safety

l) Wood Preservation, sawing technology

m) Wood science

n) Wood science, sawing technology, wood preservation

Question 5

What was the worst part of the course?

a) Wood classification, saw-blades

b) Equipment maintenance

c) Wood science

d) Nothing

e) All good

f) Furniture design needs more

g) Wants more furniture design

h) Wants more equipment maintenance

i) Very short, wood classification wants more, more furniture design j) Nothing

k) Nothing all good

l) All good

m) Nothing all good

n) Nothing all good

Evaluation of the Trainers Training Course Assessment

Course 2 at FSIV Hanoi

13 Respondents

Question 1

This course was informative? Average 4.2

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

0 0 1 8 4

This course met your expectations? Average 4.1

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

0 0 1 9 3

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

0 0 1 6 6

The presenters were easily understood? Average 4.5

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

0 0 0 6 7

The information was well presented? Average 4.5

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

0 0 1 4 8

Question 2

Rate the topics in order of relevance (score 1-9)

j) Wood Science

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

k) Sawing

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

l) Saw blades

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

m) Drying

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

n) Preservation

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

o) Safety

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

p) Maintenance

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

q) Furniture requirements

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Question 3

Were there other topics that should be included?

a) 2 - Nothing

b) Wood products

c) Workshop design

d) Wood based products, e.g MDF, Particle board

e) Veneer slicing

f) Maintenance and repairs

g) Wood markets and development

h) Wood safety and workplace management

i) 4 – no comments

Question 4

What was the best part of the course?

a) Sawing technology, wood preservation

b) Wood science, wood preservation, drying technology

c) Drying , wood preservation, work safety, wood science

d) Sawing and drying

e) Sawing technology

f) Wood science

g) Everything

h) Drying

i) Wood science

j) Saw technology

k) Wood science and drying

l) Wood classification, sawing technology, drying, furniture design m) Sawing technology and drying technology

Question 5

What was the worst part of the course?

a) 5- nothing

b) 2- Work safety

c) Furniture design requirements

d) Saw blades, Wood classification

e) 4- no comments

Evaluation of the Sawmiller Training Course Assessment

Course 3 Binh Ding Provence

12 Respondents

Question 1

This course was informative? Average 4.6

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

0 1 0 2 9

This course met your expectations? Average 4.0

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

0 1 1 6 3

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

2 0 0 3 6

The presenters were easily understood? Average 4.2

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

1 0 1 4 6

The information was well presented? Average 4.6

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

0 0 1 3 7

Question 2

Rate the topics in order of relevance (score 1-9)

r) Wood Science

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

s) Sawing

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

t) Saw blades

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

u) Drying

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

v) Preservation

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

w) Safety

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

x) Maintenance

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

y) Furniture requirements

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Question 3

Were there other topics that should be included?

a) Decorative surfaces

b) How to load the kilns for correct drying, How to correct drying defects, What

causes drying defects?

c) How to make a drying schedule for difficult species to dry

d) Sawing technical, wood preservation

e) Nothing

f) Furniture design requirements

g) The course needs to match the conditions of the company

h) 5 – No comments

Question 4

What was the best part of the course?

a) All good

b) Sawing

c) 4 - Work safety

d) 4 - Drying technical

e) 4 - Wood science and classification

f) 2 - Said saw blades

g) Sawing

h) Silviculture for growth stresses

i) Wood preservation

Question 5

What was the worst part of the course?

a) 3 - Wood science

b) 2 - Equipment maintenance c) 3 - Nothing

d) Wood preservation

e) Wood classification

f) Furniture design requirements g) Work safety

h) 4 - No comments

Evaluation of the Sawmiller Training Course Assessment

Course 4 Dong Nai Provence

21 Respondents

Question 1

This course was informative? Average 4.4

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

This course met your expectations? Average 4.1

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

0 0 2 15 4

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

0 1 2 11 7

The presenters were easily understood? Average 4.4

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

The information was well presented? Average 4.1

Score 1 Strongly

disagree;

2 Disagree 3Neither agree

nor disagree

4 Agree 5 Strongly

agree Number of

responses

0 0 3 12 6

Question 2

Rate the topics in order of relevance (score 1-9)

z) Wood Science

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

aa) Sawing

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

bb) Saw blades

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

cc) Drying

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

dd) Preservation

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

ee) Safety

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

ff) Maintenance

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

gg) Furniture requirements

Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Question 3

Were there other topics that should be included?

i) Modern sawing (like shown from the VIDEO)

j) Technical design for furniture

k) Method to manage and trade saw log plantation

l) Field trip should be involved

m) Introduction of new technologies

Question 4

What was the best part of the course?

j) 3 All good

k) 6 Drying

l) 4 Preservation

m) Wood science

n) 4 Swing

o) 5 - Work safety

p) Blade

q) Furniture design

r) Wood science

Question 5

What was the worst part of the course?

i) 2 Furniture design requirements j) Equipment preservation

k) Sawing

s) Furniture design

l) 3 Time limitation